ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Will There Be A Catholic-Mormon-Evangelical Connection For The 2012 Elections?

Mitt Romney with supporters 2 SC Will there be a Catholic Mormon Evangelical Connection for the 2012 Elections?
Photo Credit : Gage Skidmore (Creative Commons)
By
 
In the Republican primaries, one by one, an excellent slate of pretenders fell to blunders and/or well-funded partisan attacks. Money created the dominance of Mitt Romney over Rick Santorum. Rick stayed in the race in spite of being outspent 8 to 1. This GOP primary revealed the spread of preferences in Republican ranks, from RINO to Tea Party. That’s good if the Party has sense enough to use its best weapons.
Missing so far is a strong Hispanic presence that is available – over 63% refer to themselves as conservative or moderate. In the 2010 elections, the day was carried by the Conservative/TP wing. They would not compromise with the Party’s compromisers who might yet get it.
I’ve always admired Mitt for his business acumen – especially bailing out the ineptly run Salt Lake City Olympics, generating the only profitable Olympics in history. I’ve been on the short end of business restructuring before. Necessary measures can’t be held against him. We only personally grow under challenge or duress, so I’m sure many of Mitt’s “rejects” learned from the experience. We’ll only hear about the whiners. The learners give us another sword to wield.
I supported Santorum to the end. When fellow devout Catholics, Attorney/Writer Michael Gaynor and Congressman Paul Ryan, came out for Mitt, I was disappointed but not surprised given the economic solutions so badly needed.
Ryan also confides in Cardinal Tim Dolan of NY, both out of Milwaukee. I have copies of letter exchanges between Congressman Ryan and Cardinal Dolan regarding the Ryan budget that demonstrate a solid understanding of the roles of institutions run by religious bodies with their philosophical and doctrinal freedoms and constraints. The combined application of the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity are non-religious and well understood by Ryan and Dolan. The likes of Andy Stern of SEIU and others of the radical left hate it. The combination is the polar opposite of their world domination plans.
Pundits say Ryan and Romney are “attached at the hip” over fiscal policy. That is vital news, but it doesn’t deal with the other half of the battle – spiritual warfare – not religious, but of very real “good versus evil” – well-defined in Obamacare. That’s why a Catholic-Mormon=Evangelical Connection for the 2012 Elections and onward is imperative.
We all witnessed the direct attacks by the Obama Administration on the Catholic Church and its many education and service institutions. There also exists some considerable animus among Catholics, Mormons, and Evangelicals that the opposition will surely exploit. Evangelicals apparently saw Catholic Santorum as better equipped for spiritual warfare. He superseded their fears in spite of Mormon (and Evangelical) attitudes toward Catholicism. He stuck by principles these faiths share.  All the more reason to have each other’s backs as the attacks from the left intensify.
The situation was confirmed when a cable commentator viciously attacked Mitt’s Mormonism. Republicans must be better prepared. Abandoning the “Maverick” McCain by the MSM in 2008 was a lesson for all but the cocktail circuit. After the remarks by frequent White House visitor Hilary Rosen against Ann Romney, I realized we had best put aside our theological differences; remember our endowment by our Creator and protect and defend the Constitution.
“The disciples came to Jesus and complained that there were men not of their group casting out demons in his name. Jesus said, “Let them be. If they are not against us, they are with us.” Mark 9:40

CISPA: Your Privacy is in Jeopardy

Campaign for
Liberty

This coming week, Congress is set to take up another so-called "cybersecurity" bill, H.R. 3523, the "Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011" (CISPA).

And this time, many of those who joined us to stop SOPA and PIPA are supporting this legislation.

So only the immediate action of you and your fellow C4L members can help protect our privacy from the government's ever-expanding reach.

After our victory over SOPA/PIPA, I wrote to you in late February about the need to stay vigilant against Congress' attempts to assert more control over the Internet.

Well, since then, Republicans and Democrats have introduced at least four major "cybersecurity" bills.

Expanding government power is always bipartisan.

CISPA, sponsored by Rep. Mike Rogers (MI-8), is promoted as a harmless bill that will enable voluntary "information sharing" between private corporations and government agencies in the name of "cybersecurity."

Unfortunately, it would allow the transfer of vast amounts of data, including information like your Internet browsing history or email content, to any agency in the federal government, including non-civilian agencies such as the National Security Agency or the Department of Defense Cyber Command.

One major problem with these alleged "cybersecurity" bills is their overly broad focus on what information private companies are encouraged to share with federal agencies.

CISPA currently contains no incentive for private companies like Facebook or Google to remove personally identifiable information from data they share.

In addition, the way this legislation is drafted, it currently overrides privacy presumptions found in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Communications Act regarding the privacy of an individual's online communications and related records.

Essentially, CISPA would deem all existing privacy laws null and void for "cybersecurity" purposes.

Once the government has this information, there are no meaningful restrictions on its use, as its only qualifier is that it must be related to "cybersecurity" or to protect "national security."

As C4L members know too well, "national security" has become a catch-all excuse for government powergrabs since 9/11.

Finally, while the bill includes a requirement for the Director of National Intelligence's Inspector General to issue annual reports on how the government is using the information shared under the bill, such reports would only be provided to congressional intelligence committees.

These reports would not constitute meaningful restrictions or do anything to dissuade the misuse of personal information shared under CISPA.

As I hinted at earlier, unlike the January 18 "Internet blackout" over SOPA and PIPA, this time Internet giants like Facebook and Twitter are openly supporting CISPA, along with powerful special interest groups like the US Chamber of Commerce.

In other words, don't expect the cavalry to back us up on this one.

And House Leadership is currently engaged in a full-court press effort to get your representative to support H.R. 3523.

Sources on the Hill have informed us of "members only" meetings, where representatives are being encouraged to vote for CISPA as a "national security" issue addressing a "credible" "cybersecurity threat."

I'm sure it's only a coincidence that this briefing comes conveniently just ahead of when the establishment wants to ram something through.

In the face of such longshot odds, without your immediate action, I can't promise that we have even the slightest chance of beating back this egregious invasion of your privacy.

But, I've seen the power the liberty movement can have when it speaks out with a unified voice.

And you better believe members of Congress have taken notice, too.

That’s why I hope you’ll contact Congress right away.

Click here to find your representative’s information.

And after you’ve contacted Congress, please forward this email to at least five friends or family members encouraging them to do the same.

Finally, your chip-in contribution of at least $10 or $25 will help Campaign for Liberty mobilize as many Americans as possible to take action on critical issues like CISPA and other so-called "cybersecurity" bills that would strip more privacy away from Americans.

This fight won't have the glamour or media attention that SOPA and PIPA received, so please take action immediately and show Congress the liberty movement is serious about defending our constitutionally protected rights no matter the odds.

In Liberty,

Campaign for Liberty

Matt Hawes
Vice President


P.S. Internet giants like Facebook and Twitter are openly supporting H.R. 3523, the "Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011" (CISPA) - the latest plan from Congress to further infringe on Americans' privacy.

It’s up to the liberty movement to take action and stop CISPA in its tracks! Please contact your representative immediately and demand a "NO" vote on H.R. 3523 and any similar legislation!

After you've taken action, please chip in at least $10 or $25 to help Campaign for Liberty fight this - and any other - outrageous invasion of our privacy.

OBAMA FRIEND, LOUIS FARRAKHAN, OF THE NATION OF ISLAM, WARNS WHITES: 'UNLESS YOU CHANGE, YOUR END HAS COME' - AND OBAMA SAYS NOTHING!



by Alan Keyes

URGENT: Obama's erstwhile advocate, the radical anti-Semite leader of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan, is officially on the Obama campaign bandwagon! Now he's come out full-fury encouraging racial warfare and playing into a larger effort to divide and conquer America under sectarianism and strife. Is the end game Islamization and the rule of shariah law, by ensuring an Obama victory this November?

Farrakhan is notorious for abusing the very Constitution that protects his harsh, anti-American diatribes against our liberty, our heritage and everything we stand for as a nation.

He is now warning young leaders that they risk being killed if they "sell out" and adding new racially-charged, virulently anti-white sentiments to his nationwide college speaking tour.

Earlier this week, Farrakhan told his predominately black audience that they were "always at a disadvantage when you sit down with white people to negotiate." He then addressed Caucasians directly, saying, "I know you. And some of you white people – I know you better than you know yourself because God has revealed you fully."

Farrakhan, the Black Muslim leader of the Nation of Islam, even compared himself to Jesus. Farrakhan said, "You can't talk like this unless you know God. I don't just talk about God or talk about Jesus … Jesus spoke like this. That's why he was hated." Farrakhan even went so far as to tell his numerous audiences that Jesus was a Black Muslim.

Farrakhan – the same man who publicly attacked Obama for U.S. participation in the NATO assault on Libya against murderous Muslim dictator Moammar Gadhafi – also warned white Americans about their need to "change," or else:

It ain't about hating you. We ain't got no time for that. But we know who we're dealing with. We know what we're dealing with… We know your origin in the world and we know how long you were set to live and unless you change, your end has come."

Obama's church, Trinity United Church of Christ, on Chicago's South Side, was taken to task during the 2008 election for having honored Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. The church, through its magazine, bestowed on Farrakhan its Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award – named for its notorious "God Damn America" pastor – saying Farrakhan "truly epitomized greatness."

"Maybe for Wright and some others, Farrakhan 'epitomized greatness,' wrote Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen. "For most Americans, though, Farrakhan epitomizes racism, particularly in the form of anti-Semitism."

The column caught the attention of the Anti-Defamation League, which publicly pressed Obama to distance himself from the award and from Farrakhan. As with most matters involving the extremist Rev. Wright, Obama pled ignorance.

The Leftwing media continues to ignore the glaring red flags – among Obama, Gadhafi and U.S. Muslim organizations, including the Nation of Islam, with which Barack Hussein Obama was associated in the 1990s.

E.W. Jackson, bishop of the Exodus Faith Ministries, has cited Obama's role as organizer and "enthusiastic supporter" of Louis Farrakhan during the so-called "Million Man March" in Washington in 1995. Jackson also asserted that "Obama clearly has Muslim sensibilities" explaining that Obama sees the world and Israel from a Muslim perspective, and that Obama's "construct of 'The Muslim World' is unique in modern Western diplomacy as only the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical elements of that religion use that concept. It is a call to unify Muslims around the world," in evocation of the global caliphate.

With his Muslim sensibilities, more than 20 years of Rev. Wright's Afro-centrism, and open sympathy with Farrakhan's Nation of Islam, Barack Obama is smoothing the path for shariah law in America – just as he's facilitated the shariah takeover of Egypt and Libya by the Muslim Brotherhood.



November's general election in the U.S. is not just a referendum on Barack Hussein Obama. It is a referendum on shariah law and every other anti-American policy, action and sentiment espoused by the Obama administration.

Lest we forget what the Farrakhan of the 1990s, the Farrakhan that Obama so much admired, was doing – and with whom in the Islamic world he was doing it:

In January 1996, Louis Farrakhan announced that he was "taking the message of the Million Man March" on the road in a "World Friendship Tour" of African and Middle Eastern states. In reality, however, he was embarking on a global tour to consort with many of the world's bloodiest, most anti-democratic nations and lavish praise on their terror supporting leaders.

Beginning in early December 1997, Louis Farrakhan and his 24 member delegation embarked upon his third "World Friendship Tour." Farrakhan stated that he "…would like to demonstrate how diplomacy and friendly relations should be carried out" while paying visits to 52 nations on the tour. In the end, the total number of nations visited was 37, several of them notorious, Islamist tyrannies like Libya and Iran, and other Muslim despotisms like Iraq, Sudan and Syria.

Indeed, during the course of his 27 day trip, Farrakhan was feted in these five countries described by the United States government as sponsors of terrorism: Libya, Iran, Iraq, Sudan and Syria. He repeatedly denounced the American government, calling it (while in Iran) "the Great Satan."

Farrakhan returned to the U.S. in time for the Nation of Islam's annual Savior's Day celebration held February 20-22, 1998 in Chicago.

Obama, forever the facilitator and appeaser-in-chief (especially when it comes to kowtowing to Muslim terrorist groups), just recently gave his explicit approval for the Muslim Brotherhood – the radical embodiment of shariah law – to come to America and be officially recognized.

It does not seem to have occurred to the occupant of our Oval Office to instead deal with these actors as terrorists, denouncing their heinous crimes against humanity.

Shariah's strategic objective is to DESTROY WESTERN CIVILIZATION – starting with the United States.

The U.S. Constitution has been in peril ever since Barack Obama took the oath of office more than three years ago, but now he is facilitating both violent and stealth jihad determined to institute shariah law into our country via its mosques and our prisons, schools, media, government, courts and even financial institutions.

"ALLAH IS OUR OBJECTIVE, MUHAMMAD IS OUR PROPHET, THE QUR'AN IS OUR LAW, JIHAD IS OUR WAY, AND DYING IN THE WAY OF ALLAH IS OUR HIGHEST ASPIRATION!"

That is the Muslim Brotherhood motto. And that is what Barack Hussein Obama is supporting in Egypt with your tax dollars, and supporting at home by facilitating the stealthy shariah penetration of our country's institutions – and those of other Western countries, as well.
STOP SHARIAH LAW IN THE U.S. – SUPPORT H.R. 973

While the Muslim Brotherhood "Perception Management Team" came to America and schmoozed with White House officials claiming their shared principles of freedom, human rights, and justice for all – the actual record shows that nothing could be further from the truth.

Shariah law is a harsh and excessive legal and societal code straight from the Middle Ages:

It encourages husbands to beat their wives.
It allows Muslim men to marry more than one wife, including "child brides" of only a few years old!
It calls for "eye for an eye" revenge rather than justice.
It commands torture for those convicted of crimes, including cutting off hands or feet, mutilation, and even crucifixion.
It demands that "adulterers" – including innocent victims of rape – be stoned to death.
It says anyone critical of Islam or Muhammad must be killed.
It calls for the deaths of "apostates" – that is, anyone who leaves Islam.
It commands violent jihad and the total subjugation or annihilation of all religions other than Islam.
Shariah law is quickly entwining its deadly tentacles through our public schools, our courts, our society.

That's why you must, for the survival of the United States of America, help stop shariah here and now.
Islamists have declared war against you, me, and all freedom-loving Americans on multiple fronts.

STOP SHARIAH LAW IN THE U.S. – SUPPORT H.R. 973

The Muslim Brotherhood's single priority in the United States is to "wage a grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house" achieved through appearing as non-threatening "moderates" portrayed in a friendly light by the media and the Obama administration.

This insanity must stop, and it must stop now! But is it? Oh no, it's not. In fact, we are working against ourselves. Pro-shariah Obama is welcoming known sponsors of terrorism into the "democratic" process via his own State Department, not to mention aiding and abetting the hypocritical actions taken by the self-proclaimed "pro-human rights" U.N. in embracing the Muslim Brotherhood with open arms.

And if that's not enough to turn your stomach, FBI officials have just announced they are open to considering a proposal from a coalition of known terror-sponsoring Islamic organizations and extremist "interfaith" groups to establish a committee of experts to review materials used in FBI anti-terrorism training.

But shariah's quest for world domination is not the strategic objective for only the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.

Islamist terror cells AROUND THE WORLD have been placed on high alert to attack pre-designated targets in the United States and Europe, according to a source in Iran's Revolutionary Guards. Iran, as you know, is encouraging and supporting the unrest and violence plaguing the Middle East and North Africa as fundamentalist groups, like the Muslim Brotherhood, seize control in pseudo-democratic elections or foment violent uprisings as faux-democratic revolts to achieve Islamist coups.

Quds Force, a special unit of Iran's Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution (Revolutionary Guard described as "tasked with exporting" abroad Iran's Islamic revolution) is reportedly operating out of the Iranian Interests Section in Washington DC. The "interest section" is the de facto diplomatic representation of the terrorist Islamic Republic of Iran in the United States, housed under the umbrella of the Pakistani embassy. Quds Force personnel are coordinating terror cells around the world and in our own country, working out of safe houses where ammunition and explosives are already stored. Rep. Peter King (R-NY), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee stated in an interview last October that he was convinced that Iranian diplomats, operating out of New York and Washington, D.C., were attempting to spy on America reporting back to terrorist forces in Iran. The information gathered by these so-called diplomats will then be used by the Quds Forces in Tehran "to select targets for maximum effect."

Last month, the director of the New York Police Department's intelligence analysis unit, Mitchell Silber, revealed in testimony before a U.S. House intelligence panel that Iranian "diplomats" had carried out "hostile reconnaissance" of sites in New York as many as SIX TIMES.

A White House invitation is not the only way these operatives enter our country. Several hundred Quds operatives allegedly entered our country and others in Western Europe, using fake identities and claiming to be part of religious minorities under persecution in Iran. More operatives are penetrating illegally from Mexico where they have teamed up with violent Mexican drug cartels, being provided the necessary network to infiltrate America using the existing illegal drug trade to their advantage. In Latin America, the Revolutionary Guards' intelligence apparatus is training AND recruiting.

More than 800 sensitive sites in the U.S. have already been targeted for attacks by the Guards. That's not to mention those 'pre-selected' by other Islamist terror groups both abroad and here at home. According to one source, vital energy resources (power, gas and oil facilities) will be targeted for terror attacks first, followed by high-population areas, and lastly the assassination of officials of the host country who have supported war with Iran. This is only after an "all-out response" to include attacks on other countries in the Mid-East region, such as Saudi Arabia and Bahrain AFTER Israel has been decimated "by hundreds, if not thousands, of missiles."

In a statement issued just days ago, the General Command of Iran's Armed Forces said the Arab Spring (which resulted in shariah law and the Muslim Brotherhood's rise to dominance in Egypt) is "a result of the message of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its path, which is based on true Islam [shariah law]." It said, "This message has not only helped the spread of the Islamic Awakening in the region but has spread through protests in Europe and the U.S. (the Occupy Wall Street movement).

Make no mistake: WE ARE UNDER ATTACK – Appeasement is NOT the answer!

Abroad, one after another, with the open assistance of Barack Obama's administration, secularized Arab states in the Middle East are reverting into Islamist regimes and governing under the harsh imposition of shariah. Just in the last few months, Tunisia, Egypt and Libya have announced new strict Islamic forms of governance, and enforced shariah law as the ground of their nations' justice systems.

Should the West expect democratic reforms or consolidation of the "global caliphate" to be the next major Arab development in the Middle East?

Barack Obama's Arab Spring, which he absurdly claims holds such imminent promise of democratic reform for Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Syria, Bahrain, Yemen, Iraq and Afghanistan, continues to unfold – in violence and bloodshed. Experts say the revolts Obama is aiding are "essentially awarding one part of the Middle East to Iran and the other part to the Muslim Brotherhood." Both govern in adherence to shariah.

Radical Islam, with its essential, incestuous relationship to the deadly dictates of shariah law, represents a mortal threat to the sovereignty of the constitutional republic we know as the United States of America.

It is already actively imperiling western civilization in Europe … and now it has started in the United States!

STOP SHARIAH LAW IN THE U.S. – SUPPORT H.R. 973

And please understand, by "radical Islam" I do not mean to imply there is actually an entity truthfully described as "moderate Islam." What I mean by "radical" – in its truest sense – is returning to the root.

Because the truth is, the root of Islam – the all-encompassing teachings of Mohammed – is violent jihad aimed at total world domination.

Consider those three words: total world domination. That, my friend, includes our homeland, over which militant Islamists aim to hoist the banner of the Arabic crescent and star.

The Mohammedan banner is not the biblical banner of love, as portrayed in the Song of Solomon. Rather, it stands for destruction, domination, and death.

It matters little that our American history and culture rest squarely on the foundations of Judeo-Christian heritage. The forces of Islam, true to their medieval origin, seek to grind our Western way of life under their tyrannical heel … unless we stop them here and now!

To be frank, Islamists often rely on brute force to accomplish their goals … crushing their opponents into submission, as we've witnessed with invasion after invasion, throughout history in country after country.

But naked force is NOT the only weapon of Islam's arsenal. In nations like ours, where they are yet a relatively small minority, Muslims rely on stealth jihad. And that is accomplished through the imposition of shariah, the Islamic legal system that demands death for those who oppose Islam and its many legalistic dictates.

You see, Islamic shariah is the antithesis of American constitutional law. In order for shariah to thrive, personal freedom and liberty must die. That is exactly the goal of Islamists in America – and they are making tremendous headway.

My friend, right now – even as you are reading the words of this critically important message – stealth jihad is stealing your freedom … and that of your loved ones.

What's more, through this insidious form of Islamist warfare, Muslims are pushing shariah law in the United States, treasonably working for a barbaric foreign legal system to have precedence over our own constitutional republic … and in the process shredding the U.S. Constitution our forefathers crafted for us based upon the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
The simple truth is: you cannot allow this destruction of the U.S. Constitution to continue. You must help stop shariah!

Shariah law is already perverting American jurisprudence. In fact, in 2010 a New Jersey judge dropped charges against a Muslim man who brutally beat and raped his wife, all because the judge said the man's Islamic beliefs allowed such criminal conduct to overrule U.S. law!

There are presently pending more than 50 Appellate Court cases from 23 states that involve conflicts between shariah and American state law.

Florida's U.S. Rep. Sandy Adams has introduced H.R. 973 which forbids foreign law – including shariah – from our United States court system.

I say, let's begin a nationwide tidal wave of anti-shariah, pro-Constitution action to battle against both open and stealth Islamic jihad in America.

Please call your Senator or Representative demanding that they defend our God-given natural rights and our U.S. Constitution's foundational legal protections by supporting H.R. 973 to stop shariah.

Help mount a pre-emptive strike against Islamic shariah law before America finds itself sharing the plight of our Islamized European allies, like the Netherlands and France, and even Great Britain.

With all the economic disarray confronting legislators today, America's accelerating culture war with shariah – portending major implications for freedom and national security – is being largely overlooked! It is imperative that we inundate Congress, especially House and Senate Republican offices, with faxed petitions as soon as possible demanding action in stopping shariah law NOW.

If you are a patriotic, Constitution-loving American – as I know you are – your help in preserving our sovereign nation is desperately needed immediately.

STOP SHARIAH LAW IN THE U.S. – SUPPORT H.R. 973

My friend, don't delay. The forces of anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-American shariah are hard at work right now, to weaken and destroy all that is good and decent in our country. It is critically necessary that you respond today, before the Islamists further diminish your constitutional liberties… in pursuit of their plan to turn you and your children into a dhimmi subject or literal slave of an Islamic state.

Make no mistake, Muslim imams across America, with ties to violent Islamists like Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan and Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda, openly support the establishment of a "global caliphate" and the Islamic overthrow of our republic. Under the guise of "religion" they openly advocate sedition – and shariah is their vehicle for subversively implementing their overthrow of the United States and the European West.

This is a battle for America! And when you send your faxed petition, please don't forget to add a generous gift to help us expand our fight. Your donations enable us to pursue our many liberty-defending, freedom-promoting projects. A gift today of $25, $50, or $100 will go a long way to not only educate the public about the stealth jihad war being waged upon us by shariah law, but to also help defray our costs as we lobby on Capitol Hill to stop the Islamization of America.

We CAN stop the Islamic jihadists who are, right this very moment, shredding the U.S. Constitution in their crazed attacks on freedom, liberty, security. But time is short to contain the damage to our great country. Shariah must be stopped today.

STOP SHARIAH LAW IN THE U.S. – SUPPORT H.R. 973

I need you to answer our nation's call without delay.

Keep Faith,

Alan Keyes
www.DeclarationAlliance.org

Ron Paul shames Santorum & Bachmann with Biblical argument of a Just War

NOW CONFIRMED Minnesota Ron Paul Delegate Count

Virginia Says "NO" To NDAA "Indefinite Detention" Bill!!

CIA Officer (22 yrs exp) Warns USA and Israel of a Romney or Obama Presidency!

Amanda aka "ABillyRock" - Liberty, Freedom, and Why Ron Paul Already Won...

Don’t Wait for a Supreme Court Decision on ObamaCare – ACT NOW

Have you ever noticed that when the media is focused on something big going on in government, something else skulks under the radar?

By the time you learn about the other issue, it’s usually too late to stop it.

All eyes are on the Supreme Court right now, as the 50 states await a decision on the constitutionality of ObamaCare.

But something sinister is lurking behind the scenes.  ObamaCare is being planned and developed in the states RIGHT NOW!

Health Insurance Exchanges are not a new concept in America.  They were created in Utah and Massachusetts long before ObamaCare, and they have been costly and ineffective failures.

In order to institute the infamous “individual mandate,” ObamaCare bribes each state to set up what is known as a Health Insurance Exchange.  Without a state-created exchange, the individual mandate cannot be enforced.

And once our state creates an exchange, it will remain in place - even if the mandate is overturned.

Regardless of what happens in court, our state should be fighting the implementation of ObamaCare at every turn.

We must oppose ObamaCare State Exchanges every step of the way, regardless of any court decision, because:
  • ObamaCare State Exchanges mean mandated, government-run health care.
  • Hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are being used to develop ObamaCare Exchanges.  Your taxpayer dollars are being wasted, and you are footing the bill while they steal your freedoms.
  • There are strings attached to the bribe money.  Accepting the money requires the state to submissively surrender sovereignty on all health care issues.
  • After the State Exchange is up and running, federal money will dry up - and states will have to pick up the tab.  Your state taxes will have to be increased in order to pay for it!
Make no mistake, the federal government will control every aspect of your health care.

Yet, Governor Corbett claims that establishing a CorbettCare Exchange will protect Pennsylvania citizens from undue federal regulation.  The opposite is actually true. Creation of the CorbettCare Exchange does great harm and forces onerous federal regulations on our state.

Governor Corbett is readily ceding state sovereignty to the central government, and relinquishing all authority on health care matters.

Our state has already received over $34 million in bribe money!

Click here to sign the petition
demanding that ALL of the grant funds be returned immediately and all efforts to enforce ObamaCare in Pennsylvania be abandoned.

If you’d like to tell Governor Corbett how you feel about this scheme, you can reach him at 717-787-2500.

Tell your legislators that no matter what the Supreme Court decides, you expect them to protect your rights and jealously guard our state sovereignty by refusing to establish a State Exchange.

In Liberty,

Deb Wells
Interim State Coordinator
Pennsylvania Campaign for Liberty

P.S. After you sign the petition demanding that our state return all ObamaCare Exchange grant funds, please pass this message along to all of your contacts.

Ron Paul FLIX Daily News - Apr 20 2012 - Ron Paul Optimistic! - CISPA - ...

Former Mormon Tricia Erickson says Mormonism is a Racist Cult

Ron Paul Attracts 2,300-plus Voters to Event in His Former Hometown of Pittsburgh

University of Pittsburgh and broader community give Dr. Paul an enthusiastic homecoming

LAKE JACKSON, Texas – 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul attracted a remarkable 2,300-plus voters to a town hall meeting in his native city of Pittsburgh.
News articles from earlier today cite Steel City residents recalling that Dr. Paul served as a high school student council president, and that he was a track star.
Dr. Paul held his town hall meeting at 7:00 p.m. ET in the University of Pittsburgh’s Soldiers and Sailors Memorial Hall, located at 4141 Fifth Avenue in Pittsburgh, PA 15213.  The symbolism of the venue’s name was apparent as Ron Paul, a former Air Force flight surgeon, is the only veteran seeking the Republican nomination for the presidency, or the presidency for that matter.
At the event the 12-term Congressman from Texas discussed his platform of constitutionally-limited government, the restoration of our economic and civil liberties, and provisions of his path-breaking ‘Plan to Restore America.’
Photographs of Ron Paul’s Pittsburgh town hall meeting with 2,300-plus people follow.

Please vote for my avatar in the 'In It To Win It' Avatar Contest, Vote Blaine!

Please vote for my avatar in the 'In It To Win It' Avatar Contest, Vote Blaine! http://www.intowin2012.com/contest/



By: Blaine


 By: Blaine

By: Blaine

SHHH, don't tell anyone but glaciers are GROWING.

Obama quietly seeking to cede U.S. oceans to U.N. law




by Aaron Klein
  
President Obama’s ambitious plan for stepped up government regulation of the oceans includes an unreported effort to cede U.S. oceans to United Nations-based international law, WND has learned.
The plan was previously a pet project of Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, whose ocean-zoning scheme was partnered with a globalist group that also aimed to hand over U.S. oceans to U.N. governance.
Obama’s plan is still in draft form. It calls for an executive order to be issued for a National Ocean Policy that will determine how the ecosystem is managed while giving the federal government more regulatory authority over any businesses that utilize the ocean.
The executive order is to be based on the recommendations of Obama’s Interagency Ocean Policy Taskforce, created in 2010 also by executive order.
The agency is tasked with recommending specific actions for a presidential plan to achieve the vision of “an America whose stewardship ensures that the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes are healthy and resilient, safe and productive, and understood and treasured so as to promote the well-being, prosperity, and security of present and future generations.”
The Taskforce’s final recommendations, based in part on the supposed effects of “global warming, were released in a 78-page paper reviewed by WND.
The entire third section of the report recommends that the U.S. join the U.N.’s Law of the Sea Convention.
The convention defines the rights and responsibilities of nations in their use of the world’s oceans, establishing guidelines for businesses, the environment and the management of marine natural resources.
States the report:
The Task Force strongly and unanimously supports United States accession to the Convention on the Law of the Sea and ratification of its 1994 Implementing Agreement. The Law of the Sea Convention is the bedrock legal instrument governing activities on, over and under the world’s oceans.
United States accession to the Convention will further our national security, environmental, economic, and diplomatic interests.
The report lists key reasons for compliance with the law, including:
  • The Convention has garnered the unequivocal support of our national security leadership under both Republican and Democratic administrations, because, among other things, it codifies essential navigational rights and freedoms upon which our Armed Forces rely.
  • The Convention sets forth the rights and responsibilities of nations to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment and to protect and preserve resources off their shores.
  • By becoming a party to the Convention, U.S. legal rights to our extended continental shelf can be put on the strongest legal foundation.
  • As a party to the Law of the Sea Convention, the United States would have the ability to participate formally and more effectively in the interpretation and development of the Convention.
  • Joining the Law of the Sea Convention would reaffirm and enhance United States leadership in global ocean affairs.
While the White House claims its ocean plans are not meant to zone the seas, a major conclusion of the Taskforce was to “establish a framework for effective coastal and marine spatial planning (CMSP) that establishes a comprehensive, integrated, ecosystem-based approach to address conservation, economic activity, user conflict, and sustainable use of ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources.”
Panetta’s ocean scheme
Much of the Taskforce’s recommendations were previously called for by a group headed by Panetta until his appointment as CIA director in 2009. Panetta became defense secretary in July 2011.
Until his CIA appointment in 2009, Panetta co-chaired the Joint Ocean Commission Initiative, which is the partner of Citizens for Global Solutions in a push to ratify U.S. laws and regulations governing the seas.
The oceans initiative bills itself as a bipartisan, collaborative group that aims to “accelerate the pace of change that results in meaningful ocean policy reform.”
Among its main recommendations is that the U.S. should put its oceans up for regulation to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Other recommendations of Panetta’s Joint Ocean Commission Initiative, which mirror Obama’s taskforce recommendations, include:
  • The administration and Congress should establish a national ocean policy. The administration and Congress should support regional, ecosystem-based approaches to the management of ocean, coastal and Great Lakes.
  • Congress should strengthen and reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act.
  • Congress should strengthen the Clean Water Act.
The Joint Ocean Commission Initiative Leadership Council includes John Podesta, president and CEO of the Soros-funded Center for American Progress, which is reportedly highly influential in advising the White House on policy.
Podesta served as co-chairman of Obama’s presidential transition team.
Panetta’s oceans initiative is a key partner of Citizens for Global Solutions, or CGS, which, according to its literature, envisions a “future in which nations work together to abolish war, protect our rights and freedoms and solve the problems facing humanity that no nation can solve alone.”
CGS states it works to “build the political will in the United States” to achieve this global vision.
The organization currently works on issues that fall into five general areas: U.S. global engagement; global health and environment; peace and security; international law and justice; and international institutions.
CGS is a member organization and supporter of the World Federalist Movement, which openly seeks a one-world government. The World Federalist Movement considers the CGS to be its U.S. branch.
The movement brings together organizations and individuals that support the establishment of a global federal system of strengthened and democratized global institutions with plenary constitutional power accountable to the citizens of the world and a division of international authority among separate global agencies.
The movement’s headquarters are located near the U.N. building in New York City. A second office is near the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands.
The locations are significant, since the movement heavily promotes the U.N. and is the coordinator of various international projects, such as the Coalition for the International Criminal Court and the Responsibility to Protect military doctrine. That doctrine formed the basis of Obama’s justification last year to launch NATO airstrikes in Libya.

Melting the Elements: God’s Global Warming Initiative

by David Outten

 When we look at the earth, we think of it as virtually a permanent fixture in the universe. Some scientists discuss changes in the sun over billions of years that could result in the destruction of the earth, but for our generation, and the next 100 to follow, they have little to fear of cataclysmic destruction.
The concern about man-made global warming is over relatively small increases in temperature that threaten to melt polar ice, flood costal regions. and cause population shifts. In recorded history, we've seen significant periods of global warming and cooling, and humans and animals have adjusted.
The Biblical concept of global warming is catastrophic — much more like shown in the movie KNOWING. The global warming dreaded by the politically correct scientific community calls for a human response of conservation and regulation. Calls for environmental law enforcement on a global scale threaten the sovereignty of nations. Many Conservatives see the global warming scare as a ruse to promote ever-increasing government control of life on earth.
The Biblical lesson on global warming has more to do with preparation for a new heaven and a new earth. It's been nearly 2,000 years since the warnings of impending environmental catastrophe were written, but the message has always been, "Prepare to meet your maker. The end may be tonight or it may be thousands of years from now."
There's nothing wrong with recycling plastic, buying cars that get better gas mileage, or putting solar panels on your roof, but none of that behavior will prepare you for Biblical global warming.
2 Peter 3:3-13 reads:
  “In the last days scoffers will come, mocking the truth and following their own desires. They will say, ‘What happened to the promise that Jesus is coming again? From before the times of our ancestors, everything has remained the same since the world was first created.’
“They deliberately forget that God made the heavens by the word of His command, and He brought the earth out from the water and surrounded it with water. Then He used the water to destroy the ancient world with a mighty flood. And by the same word, the present heavens and earth have been stored up for fire. They are being kept for the Day of Judgment, when ungodly people will be destroyed.
“But you must not forget this one thing, dear friends: A day is like a thousand years to the Lord, and a thousand years is like a day. The Lord isn’t really being slow about His promise, as some people think. No, He is being patient for your sake. He does not want anyone to be destroyed, but wants everyone to repent. But the day of the Lord will come as unexpectedly as a thief. Then the heavens will pass away with a terrible noise, and the very elements themselves will disappear in fire, and the earth and everything on it will be found to deserve judgment.
“Since everything around us is going to be destroyed like this, what holy and godly lives you should live, looking forward to the day of God and hurrying it along. On that day, He will set the heavens on fire, and the elements will melt away in the flames. But we are looking forward to the new heavens and new earth he has promised, a world filled with God’s righteousness.”
 
A scientific name for the "elements melting with a fervent heat" is a runaway thermonuclear deflagration wave. Should one of these occur, in a twinkling of the eye the earth would be toast. The scientists working on the early atomic bombs were actually concerned about the possibility of initiating one of these.
The Bible tells us God will initiate his global warming when He chooses.
The great news is that if you're ready for that day you don't die. God has planned a new heaven and a new earth where there are no R-rated movies. There'll be no crime, no sorrow, and no bitterness. It'll be astounding. If you think this earth is beautiful, wait 'til you see the new earth.
The question is, "How do you get there?"
There've been lots of science fiction movies that have people fighting over who gets to go on the spaceship that leaves earth just before it's destroyed. Superman was one of a very few to escape a cataclysm on Krypton.
The good news is that there's ample room on the new earth and there's no crowded spaceship you have to have a ticket to ride. What you need is a proper relationship with God. You can't buy it at any price. You can't earn it with good works. This relationship is offered to you by God who sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to die on a cross so that your sins could be forgiven and a proper relationship established. The proper relationship is that, being forgiven, you now live to obey God. He gives you His Holy Spirit, living in you, to be your guide. As you surrender your life to Him, He can do amazing things through you to minister to others.
Again, you don't earn a ticket to the new earth, but those living on this earth should see your changed life almost as if you're an alien already.
1 Peter 2:11 reads:
  “Beloved, I implore you as aliens and strangers and exiles [in this world] to abstain from the sensual urges (the evil desires, the passions of the flesh, your lower nature) that wage war against the soul.”
 
The earth is headed toward disaster and judgment. Wickedness will be judged. But God has His aliens on earth to serve and be salt and light. While wickedness may not be destroyed until the final cataclysmic event, it can be reduced. Those who are prepared for the new heaven and the new earth should be doing what God leads them to do to be light in this dark world.
On earth day 2012 we should ask ourselves, "What kind of world would we like this to be as we approach judgment day? Do we want it to be more hellish or more heavenly? Do we hope for more wickedness or more righteousness? Whichever direction America takes, are we aliens in this world or beings awaiting destruction and judgment?
The next time you put out your bin of recyclables, think for a moment about God’s Biblical global warming.
Are you ready?

Ron Paul FLIX Daily News - Apr 19 2012 - TSA - Rick Santorum - Mitt Romn...

Ron Paul Pandemic causes Romney split

All hell breaks loose in Alaska
By Doug Wead
There is a split at the senior levels of the Mitt Romney campaign over how to deal with the ongoing Ron Paul takeover of the Republican Party, this, from an old friend inside.  Some are saying, “Let it happen, so what?  We have the nomination, they represent youth and Hispanics and they are the future, we need them.”  Others, I will call them Romney Hawks, are saying, “We don’t know exactly how many delegates they have and that, in itself, is dangerous.  They already have enough to embarrass us at the Republican National Convention in Tampa.”
They point to the disastrous RNC of 1992 which many believe contributed to the loss of George H. W. Bush to Bill Clinton in the general election.  They say, “We must stop the Ron Paul people at any cost.”
The Romney Hawks have been able to win in states like Alaska, Nevada and North Dakota, where they anticipated a Ron Paul takeover and carefully planned strategies to disenfranchise them.  And the war, by the way, is not just with the Ronulans.  The votes of Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and now, in many states, with any pro life delegates as well.
Part of the reason for the hardball is that the Romney team was caught by surprise in Missouri, Colorado, Minnesota, Iowa and other states.  Even more worrisome for the Romney Hawks are the delegates that they are calling “stealth Paulies” lost in the mix, among the GOP faithful, going to Tampa as bound votes for Romney but Ron Paul activists at heart.  Some estimates say that Ron Paul could end up with a third of the delegates on the floor of the RNC and “who knows what they can do?”  That has galvanized the Romney hardliners.  The purge is on.
Alaska is an example where the Romney hardliners pressed their advantage.  Last Monday, GOP state party chairman, Randy Reudrich called a state committee meeting and announced that delegate fees would be accepted no later than 48 hours “from this date” setting a deadline for Wednesday, April 18.  Then suddenly, the next day, the state party changed its mind, saying that delegate fees were required by 6:00 p.m. that very evening.
The massive Ron Paul delegation, which under fair, democratic circumstances would dominate the Alaska convention, had to move quickly to adjust, but nothing could prepare them for how dirty the fight would get and how fiercely they would be resisted.
First Reudrich’s GOP state party told delegates they could pay their $250 registration fee with personal check or by credit card online.  Then they promptly pulled the online link.  The Ron Paul-Santorum forces encouraged as many supporters as possible to make the long physical journey to the state convention a day early.  Alaska is a big state with many remote regions.  And this was an operation that had to be planned and executed in a matter of hours, at a cost of time, money and arrangements for family and work.  Miraculously it came together.  But when delegates began arriving to pay their fee the Reudrich Rules had changed again.  Personal checks were no longer acceptable.  Many rushed to the banks, while they were still open, to get money orders, barely meeting the deadline.  Some missed it by minutes, making the long trek across the state for nothing.  One was denied registration by a Party official who declared that even a money order was unacceptable.
The Alaska GOP told individual Ron Paul, prolife, or non-Romney supporters that they were prohibited from sponsoring the fee for surrogate delegates, and prohibited from covering any expenses for airfare or accommodations for anyone else.  Of course, this was not true but it worked to send some of the less wealthy delegates back home, without a chance to participate, even after being elected as a delegate from their home District.  One Ron Paul supporter who quietly, but firmly, pointed out the legality of the process, and listed Romney delegates whose expenses were paid by friends, was then told, “Yes, but they filed a state GOP waiver form.” He was then told that the party was out of forms.  “Sorry.”
In the end, it may be Governor Mitt Romney, and the GOP, who are sorry.
“They are saying that GOP state chairman, Randy Reudrich, was promised a Romney job in Washington,” says one of the Santorum organizers.  “He better hope that’s the case because he is finished in this state.”
Cooler heads in the Romney camp are concerned that Romney Hawks are driving young people, Hispanics and Independents to a Third Party or a “sit at home” attitude in the general election.  The recent Rasmussen poll which showed Ron Paul beating President Barack Obama in a general election and Mitt Romney not, may have been missed by the national media but it was seen clearly by people in both the Romney and Obama camps.
The good news for the Ron Paul people is that if no one else believes in the success of their campaign, the Romney Hawks obviously do and they are willing to cheat, lie and deceive to stop them.  Said one of the staff at Ron Paul Headquarters today, “If Mitt Romney had this thing won, he would be telling his state chairs to make it easy for new people to come into the party.”  The fact that they are shutting us out is revealing.”

Join the discussion at
http://www.facebook.com/DougWeadOfficial
Randy Reudrich and the Alaska GOP. "No newcomers allowed." (Photo from Alaskareport.com)

 PHONE NUMBER OF THE ALASKAN REPUBLICAN PARTY... Leave a message! I left one for the Chairman. DO NOT CUSS! Flood them to let them know we know what they are doing!!!!!! 1-907-276-4467

Will Maryland families be allowed to vote?

Public
Advocate Banner


Homosexual “marriage” will not become reality in Maryland without a fight.

This is my promise to you and to every resident who has been watching in horror as this terrible perversion descends upon their state.

You see, only months ago the Maryland legislature passed homosexual “marriage” in their state despite wide-spread dissent from the voters.

This is part of a national strategy of the Homosexual Lobby to use activist judges and radical legislators to force homosexual “marriage” into America despite the decisions of mainstream Americans.

They know that they cannot win a fair vote.

Every time the voting public has been given a choice about homosexual “marriage”, they have chosen real marriage!

The Homosexual Lobby used to think that they could control voter referenda -- through fear and intimidation and outright deceit -- but Americans have shown that they will not be stopped from showing their support for morality and Family values.

The Homosexual Lobby is terrified of letting Americans vote now.

Most recently we have seen the decisions of California voters invalidated by the Courts when they ruled first Prop 22 and then prop 8 to be illegal!

And now they are trying to deny Maryland residents the chance to strike down the perversion of homosexual “marriage” in their community.

I am proud to let you know that their tactics are not working.

Public Advocate has been hard at work in Maryland for weeks collecting signatures and spreading the word about this fight.

And I have been truly blessed by how many people have rushed to our side.

But we have not won yet.  We have to see this fight all the way through.

That’s why I need your support.

Public Advocate’s efforts have not been cheap and if you and I are to continue this fight it will take even more money.

Please give whatever you can today to help fund our efforts in Maryland to restore real marriage to its rightful place

For the Family,


Eugene Delgaudio
President, Public Advocate of the United States


P.S. Please prayerfully consider chipping in with a donation of $10 or more to help Public Advocate fight for traditional values.

Gingrich Continues to Draw Secret Service Protection... On Your Dime

As presidential campaigns go, as a candidate draws closer to the nomination of either part, he is assigned a secret service detail for protection. After all, one of the candidates will end up being president of the United States. But when is it time to say enough is enough? Rick Santorum has dropped out. The nomination will be Mitt Romney's, yet Newt Gingrich continues his Secret Service detail at the cost of tens of thousands of dollars... per day.
Gingrich reportedly requested Secret Service protection in February and was granted a detail in early March. In April 2008, Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan told the Homeland Security Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee that it was then costing the agency roughly $38,000 a day to service each candidate receiving protection, which was then just Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
A source with knowledge of the inner workings of the Gingrich campaign told The Daily Caller that Gingrich recently had three people on his personal security detail, though sometimes there are "many more."
Read the full story at The Daily Caller

UNITED NATIONS PROPOSES AN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTITUTION FOR THE WORLD THAT WOULD, IN EFFECT, ESTABLISH A GLOBAL GOVERNMENT



Most people have no idea that the United Nations has been drafting an environmental constitution for the world that is intended to supersede all existing national laws. This document has a working title of "Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development" and you can read the entire thing right here. Work on this proposed world environmental constitution has been going on since 1995, and the fourth edition was issued to UN member states on September 22nd, 2010. This document is intended to become a permanent binding treaty and it would establish an incredibly repressive system of global governance. This "covenant", as it is being called, claims authority over the entire global environment and everything that affects it. Considering the fact that everything that we do affects the environment in some way, that would mean that this document would become the highest form of law for all human activity. This proposed UN environmental constitution for the world is incredibly detailed. The U.S. Constitution only has 7 articles, but the UN document has 79 articles. If the U.S. eventually ratifies this treaty, any national, state or local laws that conflict with this covenant will be null and void. This is potentially one of the greatest threats to our national sovereignty that we have ever seen and we need to warn the American people about it.

Essentially what this proposed environmental covenant does is it takes the sustainable development principles underlying Agenda 21 and turns them into global constitutional law.

All parties to this new constitution would be forced to turn their nations into centrally-planned societies where all decisions about everything are evaluated within the framework of sustainable development.

If the United States became a party to this treaty, America would become a paradise for control freaks. Basic decisions about what you eat, about what you wear, about where you live, about how big a family you can have and about what activities you could engage in on a daily basis would be dictated by the mandates in the global constitution.

If you doubt this, just read the document.

Let's take a closer look at some of the wording in this proposed constitution for the world....

In documents such as these, drafters have learned to never use the term "global government" because it sets off alarm bells for people. So they often use the more politically-correct term of "governance". On page 36, we are told that proper governance includes the creation of governing institutions on various levels "from the local to the global"....

"Governance is the process of decision-making and the process by which decisions are implemented (or not implemented). It also can be defined as the rational organization of society in order to achieve the objectives emerging from its common concerns emerging from material, economic, historical and cultural foundations and needs. Governance includes the creation and the functioning of institutions and of norms at various levels from the local to the global."

In the forward to the document, we are told that the covenant is a "living document" that will serve as a blueprint for an international agreement that the authors hope will eventually be adopted by all members of the United Nations....

"The Draft Covenant is a blueprint for an international framework (or umbrella) agreement consolidating and developing existing legal principles related to environment and development. The intention is that it will remain a “living document” until – as is the hope and expectation of those who have been involved in the project – it is adopted as a basis for multilateral negotiations."

This project was originally focused almost entirely on the environment, but the authors acknowledge that there has been an increased focus on the "social and economic pillars" in this latest edition....

"Special care was taken to update it with respect to the ‘social and economic pillars’ and thereby avoid falling into the trap of concentrating solely on the ‘environmental pillar’."

In the preamble we are told that a "global partnership" is necessary in order to "achieve sustainable development"....

"...the belief that humanity currently stands at a decisive point in history, which calls for a global partnership to achieve sustainable development"

Article 3 of this proposed global constitution declares that the global environment should be under the "protection" of "international law"....

"The global environment is a common concern of humanity and under the protection of the principles of international law, the dictates of the public conscience and the fundamental values of humanity."

Later on in the document, things start becoming more specific.

In Article 16, we are told that all member nations must integrate environmental conservation into all of their national decisions....

Parties shall, at all stages and at all levels, integrate environmental conservation into the planning and implementation of their policies and activities, giving full and equal consideration to environmental, economic, social and cultural factors. To this end, the Parties shall:

(a) conduct regular national reviews of environmental and developmental policies and plans;

(b) enact, periodically review, and enforce laws and regulations; and

(c) establish or strengthen institutional structures and procedures to integrate environmental and developmental issues in all spheres of decision-making.

In Article 20, we are told that parties to this treaty will be required to "mitigate the adverse effects of climate change". That means that if this treaty is ratified in the United States, the national debate about climate change will be over and our national, state and local government institutions will all be required to actively fight man-made global warming whether it actually exists or not....

Parties shall take precautionary measures to protect the Earth’s climate system and mitigate the adverse effects of climate change. To these ends, they shall cooperate internationally inter alia to:

(a) Measure their emissions and implement nationally appropriate mitigation actions;

and

(b) Establish risk management and implement adaptation measures to enable climate-resilient development.

In Article 31, there is a requirement to eradicate poverty. Yes, everyone should work hard to eliminate poverty, but what this document envisions is a worldwide socialist system where wealth is redistributed on a global scale....

Parties, individually or in partnership with other States, international organizations and civil society, in particular the private economic sector, shall adopt measures aimed at the eradication of poverty, including measures to:

(a) legally empower people living in poverty to exercise their rights including the right to development;

(b) respect, ensure, promote and fulfill the rights of vulnerable and marginalized persons, in particular to food, water, housing and other basic needs;

(c) enable all individuals to achieve sustainable livelihoods, in particular by increasing access to and control over resources, including land;

(d) rehabilitate degraded resources, to the extent practicable, and promote sustainable use of resources for basic human needs;

(e) provide potable water and sanitation;

(f) provide education, with a particular focus on, and with the participation of women and girl children, indigenous peoples, local communities, and vulnerable or marginalized persons; and

(g) support microcredit and microinsurance schemes and the development of microfinance institutions and their capacities.

In the end, socialism always makes everyone poorer, but unfortunately the United Nations has apparently not gotten that memo yet.

In Article 32, there is a requirement to recycle "to the fullest extent possible".

If the U.S. ratifies this global environmental constitution that means that there will be a lot more government agents snooping through our trash cans to make sure that we are recycling properly like is already happening in Cleveland, Ohio.

In Article 33, countries are required to determine "the size of the human population their environment is capable of supporting" and to implement measures to make sure that the population does not exceed that level....

Parties shall develop or strengthen demographic policies in order to achieve sustainable development. To this end, the Parties shall:

(a) conduct studies to estimate the size of the human population their environment is capable of supporting and develop programmes relating to population growth at corresponding levels;

(b) cooperate to alleviate the stress on natural support systems caused by major population flows;

(c) cooperate as requested to provide a necessary infrastructure on a priority basis for areas with rapid population growth;

(d) provide to their populations full information on the options concerning family planning;

and

(e) provide for long-term resettlement of persons displaced by changing environmental conditions.

As I have written about previously, the elites that are pushing sustainable development are obsessed with population control and they love death.

Article 33 is definitely one of the most chilling parts of the entire document.

In Article 34, nations are required to maintain "an open and non-discriminatory international trading system". This document affirms the emerging one world economic system and sets out rules for how to participate in it in an environmentally responsible way....

1. Parties shall cooperate to establish and maintain an open and non-discriminatory international trading system that equitably meets the developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations.

To this end, Parties shall endeavour to ensure that:

(a) trade does not lead to the wasteful use of natural resources nor interfere with their conservation or sustainable use;

(b) trade measures addressing transboundary or global environmental problems are based, as far as possible, on international consensus;

(c) trade measures for environmental purposes do not constitute a means of arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination or a disguised restriction on international trade;

(d) unilateral trade measures by importing Parties in response to activities which are harmful or potentially harmful to the environment outside the jurisdiction of such Parties are avoided as far as possible or occur only after consultation with affected States and are implemented in a transparent manner; and

(e) prices of commodities and raw materials reflect the full direct and indirect social and environmental costs of their extraction, production, transport, marketing, and, where appropriate, ultimate disposal.

In the commentary on Article 34, we are told that a one world economic system that respects the environment is "an essential component of sustainable development"....

Paragraph 1 sets out the duty to cooperate to establish and maintain an international economic system that ensures inter- and intra generational equity, giving effect to the principles enunciated in Articles 5 (Equity and Justice) and 10 (Right to Development) of the Draft Covenant. This duty has been recognized in recent international instruments as being an essential component of sustainable development.

In Article 41, nations are instructed to integrate sustainable development principles into all decisions regarding "infrastructure and town and country planning"....

Parties shall establish and implement integrated physical planning systems, including provisions for infrastructure and town and country planning, with a view to integrating conservation of the environment, including biological diversity, into social and economic development.

In Article 51, we learn how all of this is going to be paid for.

It turns out that we will be required to finance the implementation of all of these repressive new requirements....

1. Parties undertake to provide, in accordance with their capabilities, financial support and incentives for those national activities aimed at achieving the objectives of this Covenant.

2. Parties shall pursue innovative ways of generating public and private financial resources for sustainable development.

In Article 52, it even tells us how much of our national GDP we will be required to contribute....

Parties, taking into account their respective capabilities and specific national and regional developmental priorities, objectives and circumstances, shall endeavour to augment their aid programmes to reach the United Nations General Assembly target of at least 0.7 percent of Gross National Product for Official Development Assistance.

In Article 69, the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea are essentially designated the "judicial branch" for this global governance scheme....

1. Parties shall settle disputes concerning the interpretation or application of this Covenant by peaceful means, such as by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and judicial settlement, and where appropriate, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or by any other peaceful means of their own choice.

2. If Parties to such a dispute do not reach agreement within one year following the notification by one Party to another that a dispute exists, the dispute shall, at the request of one of the Parties, be submitted to either an arbitral tribunal, including the Permanent Court of Arbitration, or to judicial settlement, including by the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea as appropriate.

Those that try to claim that this is not a proposed constitution for the world are simply being delusional. Article 71 even gives us detailed procedures for "amending" this constitution.

If this document is not intended to be a constitution, then why does it have a "preamble" like the U.S. Constitution does, why is it organized into "articles" like the U.S. Constitution is, and why does it set forth procedures for "amending" the document like the U.S. Constitution does?

And notice that the word "shall" is used constantly throughout the entire document. This proposed constitution does not contain "suggestions" that the authors hope will be followed. Rather, it contains commands which are intended to be obeyed.

This document would establish a very repressive system of world governance. The global elite believe that we are not smart enough to think for ourselves and that they need to run the entire planet like a tightly-controlled prison in order to save the environment.

If you have a few moments, go look the document over, and then come back and leave a comment with your opinion of it....

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE UN DOCUMENT!

Mandatory ‘Big Brother’ Black Boxes In All New Cars From 2015



Paul Joseph Watson

A bill already passed by the Senate and set to be rubber stamped by the House would make it mandatory for all new cars in the United States to be fitted with black box data recorders from 2015 onwards.
Section 31406 of Senate Bill 1813 (known as MAP-21), calls for “Mandatory Event Data Recorders” to be installed in all new automobiles and legislates for civil penalties to be imposed against individuals for failing to do so.
“Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall revise part 563 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, to require, beginning with model year 2015, that new passenger motor vehicles sold in the United States be equipped with an event data recorder that meets the requirements under that part,” states the bill.
Although the text of legislation states that such data would remain the property of the owner of the vehicle, the government would have the power to access it in a number of circumstances, including by court order, if the owner consents to make it available, and pursuant to an investigation or inspection conducted by the Secretary of Transportation.
Given the innumerable examples of both government and industry illegally using supposedly privacy-protected information to spy on individuals, this represents the slippery slope to total Big Brother surveillance of every American’s transport habits and location data.
The legislation, which has been given the Orwellian title ‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’, sailed through the Senate after being heavily promoted by Democrats Harry Reid and Barbara Boxer and is also expected to pass the Republican-controlled House.
Given the fact that the same bill also includes a controversial provision that would empower the IRS to revoke passports of citizens merely accused of owing over $50,000 in back taxes, stripping them of their mobility rights, could the mandatory black boxes or a similar technology be used for the same purpose?
Biometric face-recognition and transdermol sensor technology that prevents an inebriated person from driving a car by disabling the automobile has already been developed, in addition to systems that refuse to allow the vehicle to start if the driver is deemed to be overtired.
The ultimate Big Brother scenario would be a system whereby every driver had to get de facto permission from the state to drive each time they get behind the wheel, once it had been determined from an iris scan that they were good citizens who have paid all their taxes and not misbehaved.
The push to pressure car manufacturers to install black box tracking devices in all new cars has been ongoing for over a decade. In 2006, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration encouraged but did not require automobile manufacturers to install the systems.
However, in February last year NHTSA administrator David Strickland said the government was considering making the technology mandatory in the wake of recalls of millions of Toyota vehicles.
Earlier this year it was reported that the NHTSA would soon formally announce that all new cars would be mandated to have the devices fitted by law, which has now been codified into the MAP-21 bill.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.

  1. Auto bill draft would require black boxes
  2. Feds to Mandate Black Box on all New Cars
  3. Government black boxes will ‘collect every email’
  4. 9/11 Cover-Up Connection: Black Boxes Found 15 Hours After Buffalo Crash
  5. Intelligent cars will report accidents to authorities
  6. Ford Gives Cars a Voice
  7. Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory: 9/11 Episode exposes ‘found’ black boxes
  8. New Cars in California Must Display Global Warming Score
  9. Highway robbery? Texas police seize black motorists’ cash, cars
  10. Future cars to decide if driver is drunk
  11. Queen Beatrix’s Brother-In-Law Calls For Mandatory Birth Control For The “Unfit”
  12. DoT exploring technology that would disable cell phones in cars

AIM Video Study: Barack Obama vs. American Values

Bishop: Obama following path of Hitler and Stalin


by Charlie Spiering

In a homily delivered Saturday, Bishop Daniel R. Jenky of the Diocese of Peoria, Illinois challenged President Obama's HHS mandate, suggesting that the president was following the same path as Hitler and Stalin.

"Hitler and Stalin, at their better moments, would just barely tolerate some churches remaining open, but would not tolerate any competition with the state in education, social services, and health care," Jenky said. "In clear violation of our First Amendment rights, Barack Obama – with his radical, pro abortion and extreme secularist agenda, now seems intent on following a similar path." Jenky added.
Jenky reminded the men of the Catholic Church's history of surviving threats from Jihadi, Nazism and Communism and called them to stand up for their faith.

Denouncing the "entrenched corruption and sheer incompetence" of the Illinois state government, Jenky also criticized Catholic politicians who "pretend to be Catholic."

"May God have mercy on the souls of those politicians who pretend to be Catholic in church, but in their public lives, rather like Judas Iscariot, betray Jesus Christ by how they vote and how they willingly cooperate with intrinsic evil," he said.
Bishop Jenky was appointed Bishop of Peoria by Pope John Paul II in 2002.