Be sure to listen to Inquisition Update at 10 AM Central June 1

Be sure to listen to Inquisition Update at 10 AM Central tomorrow morning, June 1, because Attorney Ken Bear Chief of Tamaki Law will be my guest. He is the Attorney who successfully prosecuted ($166.1 Million) the Northwest Jesuit Province Priests for sodomizing 450 Native American children in church-run schools and institutions. I will also mention that Jesuit Father Patrick J. Conroy S.J., our new Chaplain and Jesuit Counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives, is a member of this notorious Northwest Jesuit Province of Priest Pedophilia. I told Ken to come to Inquisition Update with both barrels loaded and to let them have it! Don't miss the broadcast and spread the word.

Go to and click on "listen" at the top of the page just below the banner.


Tom Friess

Inquisition Update

JFK views on separation of Church and State

Amplify’d from

John F. Kennedy

Address to the
Greater Houston Ministerial

delivered 12 September
1960 at the Rice Hotel in Houston, TX

Reverend Meza, Reverend
Reck, I'm grateful for your generous invitation
to state my views.

While the so-called
religious issue is necessarily and properly the
chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that I
that we have far more critical issues in the 1960 campaign; the spread
of Communist influence, until it now festers only 90 miles from the
of Florida -- the humiliating treatment of our President and Vice
by those who no longer respect our power -- the hungry children I saw
West Virginia, the old people who cannot pay their doctors bills, the
forced to give up their farms -- an America with too many slums, with
few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space. These are the
issues which should decide this campaign. And they are not religious
-- for war and hunger and ignorance and despair know no religious

But because I am a
Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected President,
the real issues in this campaign have been obscured -- perhaps
in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently
for me to state once again -- not what kind of church I believe in, for
that should be important only to me -- but what kind of America I
believe in.

I believe in an America
where the separation of church and state is
absolute; where no Catholic prelate would tell the President --
he be Catholic -- how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his
parishioners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is
any public funds or political preference, and where no man is denied
office merely because his religion differs from the President who might
appoint him, or the people who might elect him.

I believe in an America
that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant
nor Jewish; where no public official either requests or accept
on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any
other ecclesiastical source; where no religious body seeks to impose
will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public
of its officials, and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an
act against one church is treated as an act against all.

For while this year it
may be a Catholic against whom the finger of
suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been -- and may someday be
again -- a Jew, or a Quaker, or a Unitarian, or a Baptist. It was
harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that led to Jefferson's
of religious freedom. Today, I may
be the victim, but tomorrow it may be
you -- until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped apart
at a time of great national peril.

Finally, I believe in an
America where religious intolerance will someday
end, where all men and all churches are treated as equals, where every
man has the same right to attend or not to attend the church of his
where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting
of any kind, and where Catholics, Protestants, and Jews, at both the
and the pastoral levels, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain
division which have so often marred their works in the past, and
instead the American ideal of brotherhood.

That is the kind of
America in which I believe. And it represents the
kind of Presidency in which I believe, a great office that must be
humbled by making it the instrument of any religious group nor
by arbitrarily withholding it -- its occupancy from the members of any
one religious
group. I believe in a President whose views on religion are his own
affair, neither imposed upon him by the nation, nor imposed by the
upon him
¹ as a condition to holding that office.
I would not look with
favor upon a President working to subvert the
first amendment's guarantees of religious liberty; nor would our system
of checks and balances permit him to do so. And neither do I look with
favor upon those who would work to subvert Article VI of the
by requiring a religious test, even by indirection. For if they
with that safeguard, they should be openly working to repeal it.

I want a Chief Executive
whose public acts are responsible to all and
obligated to none, who can attend any ceremony, service, or dinner his
office may appropriately require of him to fulfill; and whose
of his Presidential office is not limited or conditioned by any
oath, ritual, or obligation.

This is the kind of
America I believe in -- and this is the kind of
America I fought for in the South Pacific, and the kind my brother died
for in Europe. No one suggested then that we might have a divided
that we did not believe in liberty, or that we belonged to a disloyal
that threatened -- I quote -- "the freedoms for which our forefathers

And in fact this is the
kind of America for which our forefathers did
die when they fled here to escape religious test oaths that denied
office to
members of less favored churches -- when they fought for the
the Bill of Rights, the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom -- and
they fought at the shrine I visited today, the Alamo. For side by side
with Bowie and Crockett died Fuentes, and McCafferty, and Bailey, and
and Carey -- but no one knows whether they were Catholics or not. For
was no religious test there.

I ask you tonight to
follow in that tradition -- to judge me on the
basis of 14 years in the Congress, on my declared stands against an
to the Vatican, against unconstitutional aid to parochial schools, and
against any boycott of the public schools -- which I attended myself.
instead of doing this, do not judge me on the basis of these pamphlets
and publications we all have seen that carefully select quotations out
of context from the statements of Catholic church leaders, usually in
countries, frequently in other centuries, and rarely relevant to any
here. And always omitting, of course, the statement of the American
in 1948 which strongly endorsed Church-State separation, and which more
nearly reflects the views of almost every American Catholic.

I do not consider these
other quotations binding upon my public acts.
Why should you?

But let me say, with
respect to other countries, that I am wholly opposed
to the State being used by any religious group, Catholic or Protestant,
to compel, prohibit, or prosecute the free exercise of any other
And that goes for any persecution, at any time, by anyone, in any
And I hope that you and I condemn with equal fervor those nations which
deny their Presidency to Protestants, and those which deny it to
And rather than cite the misdeeds of those who differ, I would also
the record of the Catholic Church in such nations as France and
and the independence of such statesmen as De Gaulle and Adenauer.

But let me stress again
that these are my views.

For contrary to common
newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate
for President.
I am the Democratic
Party's candidate for President who happens also
to be a Catholic.

I do not speak for my
church on public matters; and the church does
not speak for me. Whatever issue may come before me as President, if I
should be elected, on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling
or any other subject, I will make my decision in accordance with these
views -- in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be in the
interest, and without regard to outside religious pressure or dictates.
And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide

But if the time should
ever come -- and I do not concede any conflict
to be remotely possible -- when my office would require me to either
my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the
office; and I hope any conscientious public servant would do likewise.

But I do not intend to
apologize for these views to my critics of either
Catholic or Protestant faith; nor do I intend to disavow either my
or my church in order to win this election.

If I should lose on the
real issues, I shall return to my seat in the
Senate, satisfied that I'd tried my best and was fairly judged.
But if this election is
decided on the basis that 40 million Americans
lost their chance of being President on the day they were baptized,
it is the whole nation that will be the loser, in the eyes of Catholics
and non-Catholics around the world, in the eyes of history, and in the
eyes of our own people.

But if, on the other
hand, I should win this election, then I shall
devote every effort of mind and spirit to fulfilling the oath of the
-- practically identical, I might add, with the oath I have taken for
years in the Congress. For without reservation, I can, "solemnly
swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the
States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and
the Constitution -- so help me God

giving the American people a warning
JFK text of secret societies Speech
The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open
society.  And
we are as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret
societies.  To secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We
decided long
ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of
pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers, which are cited to justify
it.  Even today, there’s little value in opposing the threat
of a
closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions.  Even
there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our
traditions do not survive with it.  And there is very grave
that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by
those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official
censorship and concealment.  That I do not intend to permit to
extent it is in my control.  And no official of my
whether his rank is high or low civilian or military should interpret
my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news to stifle
dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to with hold from the
press  and
the public  or to withhold from the press and the
public  the facts
they need to know.  For we are opposed around the world by a
and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for
expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration, instead of invasion
on subversion, instead of election on intimidation, instead of free
choice on guerrillas by night, instead of armies by day.  It
is a
system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into a
building of a tightly knit highly efficient machine  that
military, diplomatic intelligence, economic, scientific, and political
operations.  Its preparations are concealed, not published.
mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not
praised.  No expenditure is questioned no rumor is printed. No
is revealed.  No President should fear public scrutiny of his
For from that scrutiny comes understanding.  And from that
understanding, comes support or opposition, and both are
This administration intends to be candid about its errors. 
For as a
wise man once said "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse
to correct it."  We intend to accept full responsibility for
errors.  And we expect you to point them out when we miss
Without debate, without criticism no administration and no
country  can
succeed and no republic
can survive.  And that is why our press was
protected by the First Amendment the only business in America
specifically protected by the Constitution.  Not primarily to
amuse and
entertain not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental not to
simply ‘give the public what it wants’ this means greater coverage and
analysis of international news for it is no longer far away and foreign
but close at hand and local.  And it means that government at
levels must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest
possible information outside the narrowest limits of national
security.  And so it is to the printing press to the recorder
of man’s
deeds the keeper of his conscious.  The courier of his
news.  That we
look for strength and assistance.  Confident, that with your
help  man
will be what he was born to be FREE

Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered

Amplify’d from

Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered

This is a quote from the:




"The processes of globalization, suitably understood and directed, open up the
unprecedented possibility of large-scale redistribution of wealth on a
world-wide scale; if badly directed, however, they can lead to an increase in
poverty and inequality, and could even trigger a global crisis."

Pssst it sounds like Obama's agenda.
Do you think obama is giving the orders or the pope
Listen to both videos before deciding!!










Below are excepts from the Encyclical letter.
The Popes Plans on Organizing
by Richard Bennett Click here

In the face of the unrelenting growth of global interdependence, there is
a strongly felt need, even in the midst of a global recession, for a reform of
the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions
and international finance
, so that the concept of the family of nations can
acquire real teeth.

Obviously it would
have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all
parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various international
forums. Without this, despite the great progress accomplished in various
sectors, international law would risk being conditioned by the balance of power
among the strongest nations.

Furthermore, such an authority would need to be universally
recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all,
regard for justice, and respect for rights.

It is necessary
to correct the malfunctions, some of them serious, that cause new
divisions between peoples and within peoples, and also to ensure that the
redistribution of wealth does not come about through the redistribution or
increase of poverty

In order not to produce a dangerous universal power
of a tyrannical nature, the governance of globalization must be marked by
, articulated into several layers and involving different levels
that can work together. Globalization certainly requires authority, insofar as
it poses the problem of a global common good that needs to be pursued. This
authority, however, must be organized in a subsidiary and stratified way,
if it is not to infringe upon freedom and if it is to yield effective results in

On this front too, there is a pressing moral need for renewed solidarity,
especially in relationships between developing countries and those that are
highly industrialized. The technologically advanced societies can
and must lower their domestic energy consumption, either through an evolution in
manufacturing methods or through greater ecological sensitivity among their

Wealth Redistribution
the civil order, for
its self-regulation, also needed intervention from the State for purposes of

The processes of globalization, suitably understood and directed, open up the
unprecedented possibility of large-scale redistribution of wealth on a
world-wide scale; if badly directed, however, they can lead to an increase in
poverty and inequality, and could even trigger a global crisis.

What is also needed, though, is a worldwide redistribution of
energy resources, so that countries lacking those resources can have access to

But it also needs just laws and forms of redistribution governed
by politics, and what is more, it needs works redolent of the spirit of gift.

Religiously Guided
They also require the construction of a social
order that at last conforms to the moral order, to the interconnection between
moral and social spheres, and to the link between politics and the economic and
civil spheres, as envisaged by the Charter of the United Nations.

Much in fact depends on the underlying system of morality. On this subject
the Church's social doctrine can make a specific contribution

Such an authority would need to be regulated by law,
to observe consistently the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity, to seek
to establish the common good, and to make a commitment to
securing authentic integral human development inspired by the values of charity
in truth

exclusion of religion from the public square — and, at the other extreme,
religious fundamentalism — hinders an encounter between persons and their
collaboration for the progress of humanity.

the duty of believers to unite their efforts with those of all men and
women of good will, with the followers of other religions and with
non-believers, so that this world of ours may effectively correspond to the
divine plan: living as a family under the Creator's watchful eye.

Manage Finance, Disarm People, & Control Food Supply
To manage the global economy; to
revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present
crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and
timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the
environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there is urgent need of a
true world political authority,
as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII
indicated some years ago.

To read the whole letter go to source below




BENEDICT XVI  Click here for source

Pope Demands World Government

See more at

Part of the Patriot Act - Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians!

Amplify’d from

Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians!

See more at

Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians!

Part of the Patriot Act


Seventh - day Adventist Church HYMNAL

Seventh - day Adventist Church HYMNAL

Welcome!. This is the only Church Website to find the complete hymnbook of the Seventh day Adventist Church. Most church websites only have some of the hymns. This website has all of them. As you know many of the Hymns are also used by other christian churches so it is also a good resource for other denominations such as baptists as well. Church music is such an important part of the worship so this complete bible of every hymn and response is included. I hope you find this directory useful and that it helps you in your church music planning and bible study. God Bless.














660 - Glory Be to the Father
661 - Holy, Holy, Holy
662 - Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence
663 - Amens
664 - Sevenfold Amen
665 - All Thins Come of Thee
666 - Cast Thy Burden Upon the Lord
667 - Lord, Bless Thy Word to Every Heart
668 - O Thou Who Hearest
669 - The Lord Bless You and Keep You
670 - We Give Thee But Thine Own
671 - Now, Dear Lord, As We Pray
672 - Spirit of the Living God
673 - May God Be With You
674 - Shalom
675 - May the Lord Bless and Keep You
676 - Thy Word Is a Lantern
677 - Heavenly Father, to Thee We Pray
678 - God Be in My Head
679 - God Be in My Head
680 - Holy Spirit, Hear Us
681 - This Is the Day the Lord Hath Made
682 - As You Have Promised, Lord
683 - Jesus, Stand Among Us
684 - Hear Our Prayer, O Lord
685 - Cause Me to Hear
686 - Bless Thou the Gifts
687 - The Lord Is in His Holy Temple
688 - Surely, Surely
689 - Day by Day, Dear Lord
690 - Dismiss Us, Lord, With Blessing
691 - Lead Me, Lord
692 - The Lord Is in His Holy Temple
693 - Almighty Father
694 - Praise God, From Whom All Blessings
695 - Praise God, From Whom All Blessings