Live Now!!! Ron Paul Speaks in Henderson, Nevada | C-SPAN

Live Now!!! Ron Paul Speaks in Henderson, Nevada | C-SPAN

Ron Paul Destroys Rick Santorum On Iran! - Iowa Republian Presidential D...

Ron Paul: The Last One (No One But Paul)

Sen. Rand Paul Proposes Amendment 1490 to the STOCK Act - 1/31/12

America is the new Nazi Germany

USA is contaminating the Middle East and Afghanistan with radioactive bi...

Protesters Rally Against Gay Marriage Bill

Mitt Romney's Mexican Roots; His Father Was Born In Mexico, Romney Not a Natural Born US Citizen

The Story Mitt Romney's Family Coming To America... Then Leaving... Then...

Radioactive Steam Released At Nuclear Power Plant In Illinois

False Flag Attack USS Enterprise RED ALERT

Become Part of Ron's Signature Team

There is only a three week window to gather signatures and we ask that you bear with us as we inform you of signature events. Our delegates need all the help they can get.

If you wish to help us in an even greater way the campaign is looking for supporters that want to become part of the campaign’s Signature Team.

As a member of our team you will help fill out petitions for delegates and go door to door with petitioners.

Sign up here and become part of the team.

There are two weeks left; we need your help.

For Liberty,

Josh Pearson
Delegate Operations Coordinator

Paid for by Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign Committee

RON PAUL IS THE CHOICE OF THE TROOPS! (Veterans march on the White House)


Occupy London assault: Bailiff plows car through protesters

Israeli Company Develops Black Tomato

OCCUPY GENIUSES (The Constitution vs. Southern Occupiers)

Mitt Romney Wants to Fund Obama Care!!!

C2CAM - 2012.01.28 - Unconstitutional Legislation

Stewart Rhodes, founder of Oathkeepers was interviewed on coast to coast am on current events, how we got here and what we can do to try and buy enough time to get back to our Constitution back.

French man demands de-baptism, sues Catholic Church


 by Joel McDurmon

A French man is suing the Roman Catholic church in order to become “de-baptized.” While the church has formally recognized the man’s departure from the faith, it argues that baptism cannot be undone and thus even the names of apostates must remain on the roll of the once-baptized.
Rene LeBouvier, representing the sentiments of many others across Europe, has sued to the have the state force the church to remove his name from their books. The case, therefore, could have far-reaching implications as a precedent of state interference in purely religious beliefs and practice. NPR reports,
“They sent me a copy of my records, and in the margins next to my name, they wrote that I had chosen to leave the church,” he says.
That was in the year 2000. A decade later, LeBouvier wanted to go further. In between were the pedophile scandals and the pope preaching against condoms in AIDS-racked Africa, a position that LeBouvier calls “criminal.” Again, he asked the church to strike him from baptismal records. When the priest told him it wasn’t possible, he took the church to court.
Last October, a judge in Normandy ruled in his favor. The diocese has since appealed, and the case is pending.
“One can’t be de-baptized,” says Rev. Robert Kaslyn, dean of the School of Canon Law at the Catholic University of America.
Kaslyn says baptism changes one permanently before the church and God.
“One could refuse the grace offered by God, the grace offered by the sacrament, refuse to participate,” he says, “but we would believe the individual has still been marked for God through the sacrament, and that individual at any point could return to the church.”
French law states that citizens have the right to leave organizations if they wish. Loup Desmond, who has followed the case for the French Catholic newspaper La Croix, says he thinks it could set a legal precedent and open the way for more demands for de-baptism.
“If the justice confirms that the name Rene LeBouvier has to disappear from the books, if it is confirmed, it can be a kind of jurisprudence in France,” he says.

Ron Paul: Pennsylvania District 4 Signature Events!

Ron Paul 2012 PCC
As you may already know, Ron Paul delegates only have two weeks left to gather over 250 signatures in Pennsylvania! Since delegates actually elect the next Republican nominee, can Dr. Paul count on you to spare a few minutes to come out and sign petitions in support of these delegates?
There will be signing events this week for District 4. The details are as follows:

Wednesday 2/1, 7-9pm
CD 4 Delegate Signing Event
Vito's Pizza & Beer
1734 South Queen Street. York, PA 17403

You must reside within the districts listed to sign petitions.

If you are unsure of your new district, you can check the Congressional Map here.

Please try your best to make it out this week.  And I hope you’ll bring as many friends and family with you to sign as possible.

Thank you for all you do to help Dr. Paul win the Republican nomination!

For Liberty,

Josh Pearson
Delegate Operations Coordinator

Paid for by Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign Committee

Our mailing address is: 

Ron Paul 2012 PCC 
8000 Forbes Place 
Springfield, VA 22151

Ron Paul: White America, Wake The **** Up!

Rep Allen West - Obama Reid Pelosi Get the Hell Out of the United States...

Stewart Rhodes Senate Has Declared War on American People

Organizing a Military Stand Down Against NDAA - SCG Interviews Stewart R...

Stewart Rhodes on C2C, "This is really happening" pt.1

Obama's Great Eligibility Fraud (Not Natural Born)

New Age Bible Versions (Riplinger, The Prophecy Club) - Full Length

Rumblings in Sooke (B.C., Canada) Sparks Mystery - CTV News - January 2...

Typewriter-Obama's 'Typed' Long Form Birth Cert Forged.avi

Police arrest over 300 protesters at Occupy Oakland

RED ALERT: First NDAA "Indefinite Detention", Now Our Right to Bear Arms

Snowy Owls Rare Mass Migration To America From Arctic!

Ron Paul: ♫ I Want A New Whore ♫

Obama's Address: Another God Damned Hand Job

Newt Gingrich Confronted on Secret Bohemian Grove Sexual History

Ron Paul: Oreilly said He's Not A Factor...Let Us Decide, not You!

Woman nearly drowns in earthquake sinkhole

1/28/2012 -- Western Australia -- VORTEX 'HAARP ring' = possible severe...

2MIN News Jan28: The Officials are Wrong

Breaking! LAX FEMA Rendition Site Confirmed

# 1133 Another Shake Out New Madrid Fault

contagion , mark of the beast 666 new world order

Dave Hunt - Last Days Bible Prophecy: All Nations Against Israel

1/28/2012 -- 6.2 north of New Zealand -- MASSIVE amount of 5.0M earthqua...

Ron Paul Maine Campaign News Story 1/28/12

Jihad Jane Was A CIA Actor Working For The FBI To Generate Internet Terr...

Pentagon To Build Biggest Bunker Buster Bomb Yet For Iran

Pacific plate movement now more obvious! Two buoys showing plate movemen...

Black Choppers in LA Prepping for Martial Law

YOU will soon be KILLED or IMPRISONED unless the tide turns! THIS IS NO ...

Ron Paul: The Fight Has Just Begun

Another student attacked by own school

Public Advocate Banner

American school children are suffering the consequences of Obama’s destructive agenda.

This president has made it blindingly apparent that he will see the radical Homosexual Agenda passed at all costs...

...and inevitably, this has leaked down to so many levels.

Especially grade schools.

Public and private school teachers have become dangerously aggressive in their efforts to impose pro-homosexual curriculums and behavior on their students.

And they are emboldened precisely because they have been told by the pro-homosexual establishment that the Homosexual Classrooms Act is just over the horizon.

They have been ordered to pervert their classrooms and silence every single student who speaks out in defense of the Family and real, moral values.

And whats worse, they know they have total immunity.  The radical Homosexual Lobby and their vast sea of funds make’s sure that no teacher is ever punished for violating the First Amendment rights of their students.

The liberal media and the politicians keep saying you and I are crazy for warning the nation about this, but it keeps happening!

The latest tragedy occurred in just the last few days.

15 year old Brandon Wegner of Shawano High School, Wisconsin, was asked to write an article for his school paper.  He was actually asked to write in support of family values and explain the dangers of radical homosexual adoption.

And he did exactly that.  He argued politely and respectfully that homosexual couples are not properly equipped to raise children, while pointing out that the vast majority of States have voted against specialized homosexual “rights.”

The reaction of his teachers and school administrators was horrifying beyond belief.

Instead of being applauding for his bravery in speaking out, young Brandon was dragged into the office of the Superintendant for hours where he was subjected to a tyrannical interrogation...

...where he was threatened with severe punishments.

...where he was insulted and bullied.

All this by adults who are charged with protecting and nurturing their students.

And his parents were never even notified!

My friend, Public Advocate is the only organization in America that is fighting to preserve our children and classrooms from the horrors Brandon faced.

It is outrageous that our children are the battlefield the radical Homosexual Lobby is fighting over!

President Obama has already threatened to institute a limited form of the Gay Bill of Special Rights by Executive decree -- it won’t be too long before he tries the same thing with public schools.

I need your support to guarantee Public Advocate is ready when that day comes.

For the Family,

Eugene Delgaudio
President, Public Advocate of the United States

Turn This Ship Around: Mark Oxner For Congress

National Council of Churches General Secretary to Speak at The Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Annual Symposium

National Council of Churches General Secretary to Speak at The Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Annual Symposium

by Akefe Mviza on Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 10:18am
I saw this in the Lake Region Conference daily  newsletter.  They seem to be very proud of the fact that this guy from the National Council of Churches is going to speak to the seminary students.  The National Council of Churches is one of the groups behind the push for a one world religion.  Of course he is going to talk about "unity" in the church.  It's not in the church but "unity of all churches".  The SDA church should have nothing to do with the ecumenical movement.  It includes all religions, whether they claim to believe in the God of the Bible or pagan entities.  Please see how the Fundamental Beliefs of the SDA Church endorse, promote, this ecumenical activity.

General Secretary of National Council of Churches to Speak at Seminary Scholarship Symposium

Berrien Springs, Mich.—The Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary welcomes Rev. Dr. Michael Kinnamon, general secretary of the National Council of Churches, as the keynote speaker for the annual Seminary Scholarship Symposium. The symposium is held at the Seminary on the campus of Andrews University and runs from Jan. 31–Feb. 3, 2012. The symposium is free and open to the public.

Kinnamon is a prominent religious leader in the United States. He is a clergyman in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and a well-known ecumenical leader and educator, as well as the Allen and Dottie Miller Professor of Mission, Peace, and Ecumenical Studies at Eden Theological Seminary in Lexington, Ky. Previously, he served as the general secretary of the Consultation on Church Union and executive secretary of the World Council of Church’s Commission on Faith and Order. Kinnamon earned his PhD from the University of Chicago Divinity School.

A prominent member of the Ecumenical Movement, Kinnamon firmly believes in the need for unity in the church and works hard to build that unity. “The church is where the Spirit is,” he says. “Look for that when we sit around these tables. Trust that the Spirit has claimed these others. Getting to know one another builds that trust. This is how we deal with ongoing conflicts—not as a political caucus, but as sisters and brothers.”

The Seminary Scholarship Symposium begins Tuesday, Jan. 31, with a 10:30 a.m. Recognition Assembly in the Seminary Chapel. This assembly will celebrate selected publications of Seminary faculty in 2011, as well as present the names of those receiving the Augsburger Excellence in Teaching Award and the Horn Excellence in Research Award.

On Thursday, Feb. 2, Kinnamon will present “The Gospel of Reconciled Community” at 10:30 a.m. and a plenary address, “The Ecumenical Movement and Why You Should Be Involved,” at 7 p.m. Both events will take place in the Seminary Chapel. Prior to the plenary speech on Thursday there will be a reception and poster session in the Seminary Commons from 6–7 p.m. The symposium will conclude on Friday, Feb. 3, with two scholarly paper presentations and another poster session. Friday’s presentations begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 1 p.m.

Founded in 1874, Andrews University is the flagship institution of higher education for the Seventh-day Adventist church, located one-half mile east of the U.S. 31Bypass in Berrien Springs, Mich.

Keri Suarez Media Relations Specialist
Office of Integrated Marketing & Communication

 The Gen.Conf. is going the exact opposite direction of the 3 Angels' Messages.  It is time to get off the train with all on board going with lightning speed to perdition, and join the little companies standing on the 3 Angels' Messages--doing the work that the SDA church was raised up to do.

Another amazing thing is how the Gen. Conf. sponsored SDA church has defined "The Church" in point #12 of the 28 Fundamental Beliefs.  You would think it was about the SDA church, but it is not.  They have defined the church as:

12.     The  Church
The church is the community of believers who confess Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour.  In continuity with the people of God in Old Testament times, we are called out from the world; and we join together for worship, for fellowship, for instruction in the Word, for the celebration of the Lord's Supper, for service to all mankind, and for the worldwide proclamation of the gospel. The church derives its authority from Christ, who is the incarnate Word, and from the Scriptures, which are the written Word. The church is God's family; adopted by Him as children, its members live on the basis of the new covenant.  The church is the body of Christ, a community of faith of which Christ Himself is the Head.  The church is the bride for whom Christ died that He might sanctify and cleanse her. At His return in triumph, He will present her to Himself a glorious church, the faithful of all the ages, the purchase of His blood, not having spot or wrinkle, but holy and without blemish.

This definition means that "The Church" includes every "community of faith"--every "Christian" church denomination.  Notice that the church is also defined as "the body of Christ."  This means that the Gen. Conf. SDA and all its members churches have defined itself as part of Babylon.

13.     The Remnant and Its Mission
 The universal church is composed of all who truly believe in Christ, but in the last days, a time of widespread apostasy, a remnant has been called out to keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. This remnant announces the arrival of the judgment hour, proclaims salvation through Christ, and heralds the approach of His second advent. This proclamation is symbolised by the three angels of Revelation 14; it coincides with the work of judgment in heaven and results in a work of repentance and reform on earth. Every believer is called to have a personal part in this worldwide witness.

Another word for "universal" is Catholic.  The General Conference of SDA have put the "remnant" as part of the universal church.  The "apostasy" is not defined.  (The Catholic church sees the Protestant Reformation as the apostasy.)  What is "a remnant" called out of?   God has called  His church out of the fallen church systems of Babylon, but it appears in this statement that "a remnant" is called out of an apostasy, not out of the universal (Catholic) church.

Now notice the amazing statement of belief #14:

14.     Unity in the Body of Christ
 The church is one body with many members, called from every nation, kindred, tongue, and people. In Christ we are a new creation; distinctions of race, culture, learning, and nationality, and differences between high and low, rich and poor, male and female, must not be divisive among us. We are all equal in Christ, who by one Spirit has bonded us into one fellowship with Him and with one another; we are to serve and be served without partiality or reservation. Through the revelation of Jesus Christ in the Scriptures we share the same faith and hope, and reach out in one witness to all. This unity has its source in the oneness of the triune God, who has adopted us as His children.

The "body of Christ" is the church, but what is the church?  You think "unity in the Church" would be about unity in the SDA church, but it is not.  It is the "church" that was defined in point #12-- "the community of believers who confess Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour."    The Gen. Conf. of SDA has defined the SDA church as part of the family of Chrisitan church systems.  This statement is proclaiming to the world that the SDA church is united to the ecumenical movement!

And what is this unity based on?  "This unity has its source in the oneness of the triune God."  This is exactly what the Pope said in his encyclical "Ut Unim Sint"--"That They May Be One."  UNity is based on belief in the Trinity.
What is the only requirement to be a member of the World Council of Churches?  Belief in the Trinity.

Notice this statement from the WCC.  It is a repeat of the Fundamental Beliefs of the SDA church--STATEMENTS #12 AND #14:  “The WCC is a fellowship of churches which confess the Lord Jesus Christ as God and Saviour according to the Scriptures and therefore seek to fulfill together their common calling to the glory of the one God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit."

The direction the world is headed as the beast rises again:

In 538 AD, Justinian the Great, Easter Roman Emperor, uprooted the last of the two horns that believed in religious liberty and did not believe in the Trinity.  He was trying to create a one-world government, a one-world church system (Roman Catholic), with every one in his realm to believe in the Trinity.  This is the famous decree of Justinian in 533 AD:

“Included in the 534 code of Justinian was his famous letter he wrote to Pope John II on March 15, 533. In the same year, on March 25, he wrote to Epiphanius, Patriarch of Constantinople, confirming that the pope was now the head of the church and the corrector of heretics, and giving the pope all ecclesiastical power and authority….

“ ‘1. The Emperors Gratian, Valentinian, and Theodosius to the people of the City of Constantinople.
“ ‘We desire that all peoples subject to Our benign Empire shall live under the same religion that the Divine Peter, the Apostle, gave to the Romans, and which the said religion declares was introduced by himself, and which it is well known that the Pontiff Damasus, and Peter, Bishop of Alexandria, a man of apostolic sanctity, embraced; that is to say, in accordance with the rules of apostolic discipline and the evangelical doctrine, we should believe that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit constitute a single Deity, endowed with equal majesty, and united in the Holy Trinity.

“ ‘(1) We order all those who follow this law to assume the name of Catholic Christians, and considering others as demented and insane...."

May God help us now, as this is the direction that the General Conference of SDA, and the world, is headed.
May God help you now to repent of corporate sin and get on the platform of the Three Angels Message.

Akefe Publication 00127012012

Keep the Faith

Akefe Mviza

The National Council of Churches is an organization formally known, before 1950, as the Federal Council of Churches--organized in December, 1908. The NCC is made up of various churches within the United States of America who have agreed to become members, and to further the goals of the NCC/WCC.

The goal of the NCC is the same as the goal of the WCC, since it was the leadership of the Federal/National Council of Churches which formed the WCC in 1948 (see World Council of Churches: Religion or Revolution, by Hugh Moreton & N.W. Hutchings, p 3). Their goal goes beyond just uniting all churches into one, and includes the same goals of Catholicism, the New Age, Free masonry, the Illuminati, the United Nations, and other satanic organizations--or the goal of a New World Order, with Lucifer as god and leader.

To some this may be hard to believe, but the NCC itself states this in their recommendation of points to be followed in order to bring about world peace: "...a world government...Strong immediate limitation on national sovereignty. International control of all armies and navies. A universal system of money. Worldwide freedom of immigration. Progressive elimination of all tariff and quota restrictions on world trade. A democratically controlled international bank...

"A new order of economic life is both imminent and imperative through voluntary cooperation within the framework of democracy or through explosive political revolution." Time Magazine, March 16, 1942, p 44-48.

The WCC and it's branch organizations are indeed involved in bringing about this "explosive political revolution" in Countries which are not following their plan for a One World Church and New World Order. The following are a few examples.

The WCC gave $85,000 to an African Nationalist terrorist group--PATRIOTIC FRONT--who were waging guerilla warfare in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe in 1978 (see Seattle Times, August 25, 1981). These terrorists killed over 1900 people, including eight British missionaries and their four children in Rhodesia that year (see Reader's Digest, August, 1982). In 1974 the WCC gave 6,355 British pounds to members of the terrorist organization--ZANU--in Africa, which were responsible for killing 87 Rhodesian civilians (see WCC: Religion or Revolution, p 13). Also in 1974, the WCC gave 50,000 British pounds to another Marxist guerilla force--FRELIMO (see Ibid., p 13).

After the Rhodesian government fell to these terrorist groups, this statement was then given by their representatives at the WCC Conference in Melbourne, Australia in May, 1980: "Our hard-won victory did not come only through our own determination. We were sustained and reinforced by the support--material, moral, and spiritual--accorded to us by the World Council of Churches, and its member churches." American Opinion, January, 1982, p 4.

The WCC also gave funds to the Communist North Vietnamese government (see WCC: Religion or Revolution, p 16), the PLO, Cuba, and other pro-Soviet totalitarian movements (see Reader's Digest, January, 1983, p 120). They also gave $823,000 to the Communist backed organization--SWAPO--in Namibia (see WCC: Religion or Revolution, p 28; American Opinion, January, 1982, p 2).

As can be clearly seen, the WCC--including the NCC and other lesser branch organizations--is not working for God, but is definitely working against Him! They are in complete union with the enemy of God, and are furthering Lucifer's goal of being the god and leader of a New World Order. Hence no church of God should be connected to the WCC/NCC, let alone working with or supporting them. But where does the money come from with which the WCC finances and supports Lucifer's goal of a One World Church and New World Order--including terrorist activities to bring this about?

"The obvious question arises: From where does the money come [for WCC financing]? The answer is: It comes from you. It comes from you if you put money on the collection plate of a church that is part of a denomination which belongs to the National Council of Churches. The money goes from your church to your denomination, to the National Council, to the World Council." American Opinion, January, 1982, p 12.

Thus any church who gives financial or other support to the WCC, or to any of it's branch organizations, is guilty of supporting the move towards a One World Church and New World Order, the spread of Communism, the funding of terrorist groups, and the killing of innocent people and Christians! And not only would the church itself be held responsible, but each and every corporate member of that church would be held guilty as well! (for Biblical proof of this corporate responsibility, see Jeremiah 26:15; Revelation 18:4).

All the different churches which are members or member-units in these various branch organizations making up, and under the control of, the WCC, are technically members of the WCC itself. But WCC policy states that no individual church is a member of it, only the various branches made up of the churches. Thus, when any question arises as to whether a particular church is part of the WCC, the leaders of these various churches can technically tell their membership that their church is not a member of the WCC, when it really is through connection to the various branches!

The following is a partial list of churches which are documented as being a part of, and cooperating or working with, the WCC/NCC; and some for many years: Anglican, Assemblies of God, Baptist (including Seventh-day), Brethren, Catholic (including Old), Christian, Church of God, Congregational, Community, Disciples, Episcopal, Evangelical, Friends (Quakers), Full Gospel, Holiness, Latter Day Saints (Mormon), Lutheran, Mennonite, Methodist, Missionary, Moravian, Orthodox (Bulgarian, Christian, Eastern, Greek, Hungarian, Romanian, Russian, Syrian, Ukrainian), Pentecostal, Presbyterian, Protestant, Reformed, Seventh-day Adventist, United, and Wesleyan (see Letter from the National Council of Churches of Christ, January 13, 1965, from Wilbur C. Parry, Associate General Secretary; American Opinion, January, 1982, p 11; Directory of Christian Councils, published by the World Council of Churches, 1985).

Yet, even though church union and cooperation is clearly listed in various publications, many church leaders deny that their church has any connection or union with, or has given any support to, the WCC! But the above list does not lie! This means that all these churches, including every member of these churches, are guilty of supporting the goal towards a One World Church and New World Order, the spreading of Communism, terrorism, and aiding the killing of innocent people. In fact, all those churches which are united in the above endeavor to establish a One World Church and New World Order are depicted in the Bible as being part of Babylon the Great--that great religious system of evil which works counter to God and seeks to destory His kingdom.

God would have His church and people completely separate and distinct from all the churches of Babylon which are guilty of doing any of the evils listed above, that they might be a peculiar people unto Him as well as His special treasure in this world of wickedness.

"And ye shall be holy unto Me: for I the Lord am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be Mine." Leviticus 20:26.

"Now therefore, if ye will obey My voice indeed, and keep My covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto Me above all people..." Exodus 19:5 (see also Deuteronomy 7:6 & 26:18-19; 1 Peter 2:9).

What have these churches done with God's will that they should be a separate, peculiar, special treasure unto Himself and to no one else? They have rejected God's will, and have united themselves together with the churches in the WCC. They have refused to be a special and holy people unto God, and have chosen instead to cooperate and work with Lucifer and his evil agencies to further his satanic goals! They have spurned God's immense love and mercy showered upon them, and have instead become a treasure of the kingdom of Babylon. How can any church and people really believe that they can do God's work, spread His gospel messages, fear, obey, and honor only Him, and give Him the praise and glory due His holy name, when they give up their peculiarity by uniting with the evil agencies and wicked organizations doing the bidding of Lucifer? What blindness! How can they be separate and peculiar when they are in union and allied with God's avowed Babylonian enemies? Hence all of these churches and people are no longer God's peculiar church and people!
By these churches allying themselves with the WCC, they have not only put aside and rejected the command of God to be peculiar from all the rest of the churches who work evil, but she has also rejected Someone else. She has rejected the precious Saviour Jesus Christ!

Christ spent centuries bringing His Christian church and people into existence. Unceasingly He worked for His church, opening the eyes of His people to the precious truths which would polarize the world and prepare the way for His second coming and the end of sin. Constantly He called His separated, peculiar, special, and treasured people to reflect His image and thus to vindicate God's character to the whole universe, proving Satan's accusations false. And then to have His chosen people and church spurn His immense love, turn their backs and faces from Him, give up their peculiarity, and unite themselves with Satan as his harlotrous Babylonian bride and church: HOW MUST THIS MAKE CHRIST FEEL?

How many tears has Jesus shed over this? How much pain has He felt? How much more agony must He endure? What must He be thinking to see His professed people asleep believing that all is right with their church, when all is terribly wrong? Oh, may our people awaken and see more fully what Christ is going through because a once-chosen people and church have rejected Him, given up their peculiarity, united in harlotry with His avowed enemy, and are working directly against Him with all the power and subtlety of the Devil!

Since these churches have done all these things, how can they be part of God's chosen, peculiar, and true church anymore? It cannot be anything but a counterfeit of God's true church! And since it is not God's chosen and peculiar church anymore, then whose church is it? Satan's! And what is another name listed in the Bible for Satan's church? Babylon! And what does God want His true people to do regarding their connection and membership in any church which is in union with Babylon the Great?

"And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, My people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." Revelation 18:4-5.

This last message of mercy reveals to every member of every church that is connected with Babylon the Great (being all those united with the WCC, as well as all other spiritualistic religions), that if they remain as members they will be a partaker of her sins, and will receive the plagues. And the only pathway God has prepared for His people to walk to avoid being held guilty of Babylon's sins and being destroyed along with their apostate church, is to separate their connection and membership completely from that church, and instead to become connected with Jesus Christ and become a partaker of His grace and righteousness--thus having the assurance of eternal life.

If you remain members of any church which has given up its peculiarity to God and has become corrupted by being connected with the WCC and Babylon the Great, then you yourself have lost your peculiarity of being one of God's children because of your connection to the WCC and Babylon the Great through your membership in the church! Thus how could you ever receive the seal of God and make it to heaven? It would be impossible, because you are considered a partaker and sharer in all the sins of your corrupt church, and are no longer peculiar to God!

There is no way that any member of any church which is connected with the WCC and Babylon the Great, or with any other satanic religion and organization, can receive the seal of God until after they break all union with their corrupt church, and show themselves to be peculiar to God. And if they refuse to separate, and choose to remain on the side of Babylon, then they show that they are ashamed of Jesus because they will not obey His voice to separate and be distinct and peculiar--standing on the Lord's side! Thus they will be destroyed, along with their apostate church.

Thus the only way to regain your peculiarity and again become part of God's chosen people, is to separate yourself completely from all churches which are part of, and in union with, Babylon the Great. And until you follow this straight and narrow pathway of separation, you are not one of God's followers or one of His children!

When do we regain our peculiarity to God--becoming His sons and daughters, and God becoming our Father? It is only after we separate ourselves and all our connections with all the apostate churches making up Babylon the Great; not before, but after! You can only make a covenant to serve God and Him only after you have broken all your connections and covenants--or membership--made with the church! And until you do break all union with an apostate church, you are not God's child, He is not your God and Father, and heaven is not your home.

God does not ask His people to go through this purifying process of separation alone, but has promised to help us if we will choose to return unto Him with a whole heart and start walking this narrow pathway. Yet, God will not force anyone to return back to Him by separating completely from all connection with Babylonian churches. It is a free-will choice.

So what is you decision going to be? Will you remain connected to any church which is in union and harmony with Babylon the Great and be held guilty of all her wickedness? Or are you going to obey God, and go through the purifying process of breaking all connection with and separating from all the churches which are part of Babylon the Great, and regain your peculiarity with God, becoming His child once again? Will you make this covenant of sacrifice to return unto God, and follow and serve Him only? Will you escape from being guilty of Babylon's sins and receiving of her plagues? Or will you cling to the church, share her sin, and suffer the wrath of God?

"How long halt ye between two opinions? if the Lord be God, follow Him: but if Baal, then follow him." 1 Kings 18:21.

"Flee out of the midst of Babylon, and deliver every man his soul: be not cut off in her iniquity..." Jeremiah 51:6.

Twitter now lets governments decide what content is suitable for their citizens

Error 404: Freedom not found
Twitter announced a major change to its censorship policy Thursday to allow the social media service to choose which tweets are seen in which countries. Though it has yet to use the ability, Twitter says it can now "reactively withhold content from users in a specific country — while keeping it available in the rest of the world."
In an entry on Twitter's own blog, the company cited the countries of France and Germany, which specifically ban pro-Nazi content. This announcement would presumably mean that users in the United States are finally allowed to send pro-Nazi tweets — a dubious honor, but one that's important on First Amendment grounds.
Freedom of Speech is one of the United States' most cherished rights, which makes it easy to forget that not all people around the world are free to say whatever is on their mind. Twitter was blocked in Egypt during the 2011 Egyptian Protests in the country, and the country of China forbids its citizens from using the social networking service.
Twitter says it remains opposed to censorship, but that censorship is a cost of doing business in certain countries. The company promises full transparency with the new policy, keeping a list of all takedown requests on a new page.
[Image source: WordRidden]
This article was written by Fox Van Allen and originally appeared on Tecca
More from Tecca:

Video Of Entire Georgia Obama Eligibility Hearing

Archived Video of the Obama Eligibility Hearing, Thursday 1-26-12 in Atlanta Georgia.
The audio is sometimes hard to hear, but has been enhanced from original.
This video was entirely funded and produced by Article Two Super Pac. They have graciously allowed us to post this video here to get the message out to as many people as possible.They cannot do this important work without your help. Please consider donating to them to help them defray the costs of this video. In addition, they need help to fund future videos that shine a light on important issues that the mainstream media refuses to talk about. Please donate  to them today.

Video of the hearing today (1-26-2012) in Georgia on Obama's Eligibility. For a synopsis of this hearing go to

This video was entirely funded and produced by Article Two Super Pac: They have graciously allowed us to post this video here to get the message out to as many people as possible.
They cannot do this important work without your help. Please consider donating to them to help them defray the costs of this video. In addition, they need help to fund future videos that shine a light on important issues that the mainstream media refuses to talk about. Please donate to them today.

Carl Swensson Takes Obama To Court For Real

Ron Paul R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 2012 Banners & Pictures

Ron Paul R[̲̅ə̲̅٨̲̅٥̲̅٦̲̅]ution 2012

News Media Says "Paul Begley" Invented Hoax Of Sounds Apocalypse!

Black birds swarm Kentucky neighborhood.

Tens Of Thousands Of Black Birds Swarm Kentucky!

Apocaylpse "Trumpet Sounds" In Saskatchewan Canada

Texas River Flowing In Blood!!!

Australia River 5,000 Dead Fish "Hosea Prophecy" Again?

Iran Is Preparing For Armageddon "12th Imam Mahdi" Coming?

Kuwaiti Prince Abdullah al-Sabah Gets Salvation Jesus Christ

99 Whales Stranded On Beach In New Zealand!!

US democracy counts the votes from dead people !

Google Steps To Far - March 7th Youtube Changes Much Bigger than We Thou...

Anon hijacks Polish Government sites in response to ACTA

7 NEWS - [ARRESTED] Helpless CHINESE Man Attacked and Jumped by 7 Others

FULL VERSION Helpless CHINESE Man Attacked and Jumped by 7 Others

Mainstream Reporting Strange Noises Heard Around The World - Jan 26, 2012

Source: NYPD Head's Son Accused of Sex Assault

Newt Gingrich Billionaire Backer Believes "Palestinians Are An Invented ...

Babysitter Attempt's To Kill Infant Because "It's Evil"

Calls For NY Police Commissioner Ray Kelly To Resign After Appearing In ...

Pentagon shooter records video while firing shots

A Letter From Obama’s Sleazy Attorney In Atlanta

barack obama9355 A Letter From Obamas Sleazy Attorney in Atlanta
(From our friend George Miller of the Ventura County Tea Party):
Per 1-25-12
See the letter below. What Obama is asking now is totally insane. He is asking Georgia’s secretary of state to take the trial away from the judge on the eve of said trial. He is mostly crying on the shoulder of the secretary of state of Ga. and saying that Orly is bad because she issued all of those subpoenas. So, after the judge told Obama that the subpoena that I issued was perfectly valid, and he had to appear in court tomorrow and bring with him all of the documents that I demanded, Obama decided to go behind the back of the judge and send the same complaint about me to the secretary of state. He is also asking the secretary of state to take the trial away from the judge.
Does this look like a behavior of an innocent person? An innocent person would have come to court and showed all the valid documents with the embossed seals, which are verifiable. Instead, he is acting like a 5 year old brat, saying “I am afraid of Orly; I want the secretary of state of Ga. to act like my mommy and protect me from Orly.” Some leader of a free world…
815.846.0719 (fax)
January 25, 2012
Hon. Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State
214 State Capitol
Atlanta, Georgia 30334
via email to Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.
Re: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings
Dear Secretary Kemp:
This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia – that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.
Nonetheless, the Administrative Law Judge has exercised no control whatsoever over this proceeding, and it threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the State and your Office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the President in his capacity as a candidate. Only last week, he denied a Motion to Quash a subpoena he approved on the request of plaintiff’s counsel for the personal appearance of the President at the hearing, now scheduled for January 26.
For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued.
It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website. “Under the United States Constitution, a public record of a state is required to be given ‘full faith and credit’ by all other states in the country. Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011), p.41.
Nonetheless, the ALJ has decided, for whatever reason, to lend assistance through his office—and by extension, yours—to the political and legally groundless tactics of the plaintiffs. One of the attorneys for the plaintiffs has downloaded form subpoenas which she tried to serve around the country. Plaintiff’s attorney sent subpoenas seeking to force attendance by an office machine salesman in Seattle; seeking to force the United States Attorney to bring an unnamed “Custodian of Records Department of Homeland Security” to attend the hearing with immunization records; and asking the same U.S. Attorney to bring the same records allegedly possessed by “Custodian of Records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.” She served subpoenas attempting to compel the production of documents and the attendance of Susan Daniels and John Daniels, both apparently out of state witnesses, regarding Social Security records. She is seeking to compel the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii to bring to Atlanta the “original typewritten 1961 birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II, issued 08.08.1961 by Dr. David Sinclair…,” even though Hawaii courts had dismissed with prejudice the last attempt to force release of confidential records on November 9, 2011. Taitz v. Fuddy, CA No. 11-1-1731-08 RAN.
In Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1365 (USDC MD GA, 2009), Judge Clay Land wrote this of plaintiff’s attorney:
When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law….
As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement,’ Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to use litigation to provide the ‘legal foundation’ for her political agenda. She seeks to use the Court’s power to compel discovery in her efforts force the President to produce a ‘birth certificate’ that is satisfactory to herself and her followers.” 670 F. Supp. 2d at 1366.
All issues were presented to your hearing officer—the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel—and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok. He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them. Perhaps he is aware that there is no credible response; perhaps he appreciates that the very demand made of his office—that it address constitutional issues—is by law not within its authority. See, for example, Flint River Mills v. Henry, 234 Ga. 385, 216 S.E.2d 895 (1975); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.22(3).
The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued. A referring agency may withdraw the request at any time. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.17(1). Indeed, regardless of the collapse of proceedings before the ALJ, the original hearing request was defective as a matter of law. Terry v. Handel, 08cv158774S (Superior Court Fulton County, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Supreme Court),reconsideration denied, No. S09A1373. (“The Secretary of State of Georgia is not given any authority that is discretionary nor any that is mandatory to refuse to allow someone to be listed as a candidate for President by a political party because she believes that the candidate might not be qualified.”) Similarly, no law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193. Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.
We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.
Very truly yours,
Georgia State Bar Number 385850
Attorney for President Barack Obama
cc: Hon. Michael Malihi (c/o Kim Beal (
Van Irion, Esq. (
Orly Taitz, Esq. (
Mark Hatfield, Esq. (
Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq. (
Stefan Ritter, Esq. (
Ann Brumbaugh, Esq. (
Darcy Coty, Esq. (
Andrew B. Flake, Esq. (


By Craig Andresen

Update: Obama's Georgia Ballot Hearing: Judge Wanted To 
Immediately Enter Default Judgment Against Obama
Dean Haskins on the Scene at Hearing

As we are trying to get a quick lunch, and then do some interviews, this is just a very brief synopsis of what happened today. Before the hearing started, the judge called the attorneys into his chambers and explained that he was going to enter a default judgment in their favor. Attorneys Hatfield and Irion requested to be able to present abbreviated versions of their arguments so that they would be on the record. At that point, Irion estimated he would need 20 minutes, Hatfield estimated he would need 30 minutes, and Taitz estimated she would need 2 hours.

Van Irion and Mark Hatfield made their arguments, and left. Taitz then presented her argument, calling several witnesses, until the judge asked her to make her closing statement. As her closing statement began, the judge asked if she was testifying, and, in an unconventional move, Taitz took the witness stand to testify. The judge finally asked her just to make her closing statement, which she did.

We believe that the default judgment automatically translates into the judge's recommendation to the Sec. Of State being that Obama should not appear on the ballot in Georgia.

Back to work . . . more to come!

UPDATE: From Plaintiff, in one of the Georgia challenges, Carl Swensson: To all my friends in battle,

The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.

Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment. - Carl

You can also find a blow by blow account of today's hearing in Georgia here:

Article II Super PAC reports they will post an archive of today's hearing soon as it is available:


Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPAC

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am  EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.

Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.
Game on.
5 minutes.
10 minutes.
15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
20 minutes.
It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.
Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly not.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Gogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
What can we take away from this?
It’s interesting.
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.
What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.

Obama Signs Global Internet Treaty Worse Than SOPA

Paul Joseph Watson

White House bypasses Senate to ink agreement that could allow Chinese companies to demand ISPs remove web content in US with no legal oversight.

Months before the debate about Internet censorship raged as SOPA and PIPA dominated the concerns of web users, President Obama signed an international treaty that would allow companies in China or any other country in the world to demand ISPs remove web content in the US with no legal oversight whatsoever.
Obama Signs Global Internet Treaty Worse Than SOPA   government stickers acta protest.n
The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement was signed by Obama on October 1 2011, yet is currently the subject of a White House petition demanding Senators be forced to ratify the treaty. The White House has circumvented the necessity to have the treaty confirmed by lawmakers by presenting it an as “executive agreement,” although legal scholars have highlighted the dubious nature of this characterization.
The hacktivist group Anonymous attacked and took offline the Federal Trade Commission’s website yesterday in protest against the treaty, which was also the subject of demonstrations across major cities in Poland, a country set to sign the agreement today.
Under the provisions of ACTA, copyright holders will be granted sweeping direct powers to demand ISPs remove material from the Internet on a whim. Whereas ISPs normally are only forced to remove content after a court order, all legal oversight will be abolished, a precedent that will apply globally, rendering the treaty worse in its potential scope for abuse than SOPA or PIPA.
A country known for its enforcement of harsh Internet censorship policies like China could demand under the treaty that an ISP in the United States remove content or terminate a website on its server altogether. As we have seen from the enforcement of similar copyright policies in the US, websites are sometimes targeted for no justifiable reason.
The groups pushing the treaty also want to empower copyright holders with the ability to demand that users who violate intellectual property rights (with no legal process) have their Internet connections terminated, a punishment that could only ever be properly enforced by the creation of an individual Internet ID card for every web user, a system that is already in the works.
“The same industry rightsholder groups that support the creation of ACTA have also called for mandatory network-level filtering by Internet Service Providers and for Internet Service Providers to terminate citizens’ Internet connection on repeat allegation of copyright infringement (the “Three Strikes” /Graduated Response) so there is reason to believe that ACTA will seek to increase intermediary liability and require these things of Internet Service Providers,” reports the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The treaty will also mandate that ISPs disclose personal user information to the copyright holder, while providing authorities across the globe with broader powers to search laptops and Internet-capable devices at border checkpoints.
In presenting ACTA as an “international agreement” rather than a treaty, the Obama administration managed to circumvent the legislative process and avoid having to get Senate approval, a method questioned by Senator Wyden.
“That said, even if Obama has declared ACTA an executive agreement (while those in Europe insist that it’s a binding treaty), there is a very real Constitutional question here: can it actually be an executive agreement?” asks TechDirt. “The law is clear that the only things that can be covered by executive agreements are things that involve items that are solely under the President’s mandate. That is, you can’t sign an executive agreement that impacts the things Congress has control over. But here’s the thing: intellectual property, in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, is an issue given to Congress, not the President. Thus, there’s a pretty strong argument that the president legally cannot sign any intellectual property agreements as an executive agreement and, instead, must submit them to the Senate.”.
26 European Union member states along with the EU itself are set to sign the treaty at a ceremony today in Tokyo. Other countries wishing to sign the agreement have until May 2013 to do so.
Critics are urging those concerned about Obama’s decision to sign the document with no legislative oversight to demand the Senate be forced to ratify the treaty.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.