“The SECRET INSTRUCTIONS formed a code of the laws of Jesuitism. They were not allowed to be made known even to many members of a certain class of Jesuits. They had bold, daring, bad men to achieve desperate deeds, and take off their enemies by steel or bullet, or poisoned chalice. These knew something that others did not. The had also disguised agents, men in mask. These Jesuits knew something not imparted to others of the same order. They had shrewd, crafty, courteous, and most polished men, who courted nobles, insinuated themselves into the favor of princes, kings, and rich widows, and young heirs and heiresses. These had their “INSTRUCTIONS” from their general. They had fine scholars, decent, steady, serious, moral men. These were not at all let into the secret of CERTAIN INSTRUCTIONS. They were sent out as traps to captivate the serious, the unsuspecting, the religious. These had it in charge to give a captivating representation of their Society of Jesus. These taught that they mingled in no politics, sought no riches, kept strictly their vow of poverty. Their sole object, was by the help of heaven, to convert the world, and put down Protestantism and all herecies [heresies]! And in these details these classes of this sect were honest. For they were not initiated into “the Secret Instructions.” And hence they could, with an honest conscience, deny, and even swear on the cross, that no such Instructions were ever given, or ever received. And the initiated Jesuits took special care to push forward these decent, amiable, moral and trustworthy men, to declare to the world that no such rules, and no such maxims as these of THE SECRET INSTRUCTIONS ever existed among them. And from the high character of these men, their testimony was of great weight with kings, nobles, and even Protestants.
“This throws light upon the mystery and contradictory statements made by honest Jesuits and historians; and by Protestants. The profligate, the cunning, the daring, and all similar classes in this motley sect, with their general, and the host of his spies crawling like the frogs, and flying like the locusts of Egypt, over all the land, were fully initiated into the secret of these “Instructions:” and they acted on them, ever day. Hence the horrid marks of their footsteps of pollution and blood!!!”
Therefore, since Fr. Fessio appears to be one of these class of Jesuits, he was calm, cogent and openly honest with no audible evidence of concealing any secret design of those monsters who rule the Society of Jesus. He entered and exited the interview with a clear and open presentation, and was completely approachable not stumbling at any question or rivaling statement. Now as to his stated errors, as a result of his many years of indoctrination and brainwashing, I will name only a few:
1. The Society of Jesus is not a Military Order. Clearly the Order is formally called “The Company” of Jesus. It even has a magazine published in America titled “Company.”
2. He put the Order in only a good light, the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus, while never adding that his Order was created to “fight and down Protestantism” as stated by Jesuit Thomas Sherman, the son of burn-em-up General T. Sherman.
3. The Bible is generally “the Bible,” with no significant differences in any English translation. If so, then why is the epic Reformation English Bible, the AV1611, still on the list of forbidden books by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, formerly the Holy Office of the Inquisition. Clearly there are major differences between Bibles. The Order’s Counter Reformation Council of Trent, of which the Jesuits must enforce today, states that the Hebrew and Greek scriptures are not the Scriptures, rather Jerome’s Latin Vulgate is the Scripture.
4. The AV1611 and the RSV are essentially the same Bible. This is utter nonsense: for the underlying Greek text of the RSV springing from the secretly compiled, Westcott and Hort Greek text, differs from the Textus Receptus in at least 5,788 places as per the analysis of F. H. A. Scrivener, the only honest man on the English Revision Committee (1871-1881). The RSV of 1952 is an outwork of this corrupt committee that attacked the AV1611 Bible, the foundation for White Protestant Western Civilization and the White Protestant British Empire.
5. The Constitutions of the Society of Jesus is a public document; true, but only as a result of the French government of Louis XV forcibly bringing it to light in 1762 during a famous lawsuit. That manifestation of the diabolical workings of the order led to the expulsion of the Company in 1764, for which France suffered the loss of her king and the ensuing French Revolution.
6. The Society of Jesus is not the bodyguard of the pope. Clearly, this is false according to several histories, a few of which are Roman Catholic. Further, as mandated by Canon Law, the confessor of the pope must always be—a Jesuit!
7. The Society of Jesus has changed from its original workings. Nonsense! The Order enforces its designs via trusted third parties, such entities as the RIIA and the CFR of which the Jesuit knew nothing. I find this to be deceptive, especially when Fr. Joseph A. O’Hare, former president of Fordham University in the Bronx, is a Presider—as is David Rockefeller—in the CFR. Fessio’s Jesuit superior at the University of San Francisco is President Stephen A. Privett, a friend of many CFR members including Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama, knows O’Hare personally.
8. He speaks of Dominican Thomas Aquinas in a positive light. Aquinas wrote in his Summa Theologica stating it is no murder to kill a heretic, VAIII quoting the entire text.
9. He claims to believe in national sovereignties, yet, via Jesuit duplicity, defends the Alien Roman Catholic Mexican Invasion of America under the guise of lawful immigration premised upon economic necessity, failing to state the reason for the poverty of Mexico is the nation’s Roman Catholic religion. He believes in inter-national socialist-communism, that nations—historic White Protestant nations—do not have the right to financially excel over other nations, nations that are Roman Catholic. For the vast majority of “immigrants” into the US are from Roman Catholic nations such as Mexico, those in Central America, those in South America, Haiti, Dominican Republic, etc., and these people are then registered into the socialist-communist Democratic Party.
10. He dares to own Johann Sebastian Bach, the German Lutheran Protestant and greatest composer in world history. The purpose of the Company is to destroy such men and their works.
11. He dares to give the impression that the Jesuit Order is not wealthy. Surely he knows the Order controls the Bank of America founded in San Francisco by an Italian Knight of Malta, Amadeo Giannini, in 1904. Further, he makes no mention of the Order’s controlling stock in America’s aircraft manufacturers as proven in Avro Manhattan’s The Vatican Billions.
12. He dares to state that only 3,000 people were put to death during the reign of the Holy Office of the Inquisition. He states that it existed for only 300 years. Both are tacitly false, as it is a statement by John Dowling in his The History of Romanism that 50 million were murdered. According to The Great Apostasy Identical with Papal Rome; Or, An Exposition of the Mystery of Iniquity, and the Doom of Antichrist, by Joseph F. Berg (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1842) pp. 139, 167, the Holy Office, from the time of its real inception under the damnable Pope Innocent III in 1207 to its suppression by Napoleon in 1808, 68 Million were murdered. In this, the Jesuit is a brazen liar, especially when one can traverse Europe and find scores of the Inquisition’s torture chambers especially in France and Germany.
Now let us review questions that any interviewer should ask any guest Jesuit:
1. Do you uphold the pope’s Spiritual Power, that every person must be subject to the Roman Pontiff?
2. Do you uphold the pope’s Temporal Power, that every government should be subject to the Roman Pontiff?
3. Do you believe the doctrines put forth by Jesuit Francisco Suarez justifying regicide?
4. Is the Society of Jesus a separate entity of the Roman Papacy, since no Jesuit is answerable to any non-Jesuit priest?
5. Was the Society of Jesus involved in the assassination of French King Henry IV? the attempted assassination of Queen Elizabeth I? the assassination of Abraham Lincoln? the assassination of John F. Kennedy? the assassination of Benito Juarez? the attempted assassination of Otto von Bismarck? the assassination of William of Orange I?
6. Was the Society of Jesus involved in St. Bartholomew’s Massacre in France (1572)? inciting the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648); the tyranny of King Charles I that let to the Puritan Revolution (1642-1652)? the French Revolution (1789)? all of which a Jesuit hand can be evidenced?
7. Does not the Jesuit Superior General commanding the Company of Jesus, in fact, control the pope who in turn controls the entire Roman Papacy thanks to the imposition of “Infallibility” during the First Vatican Council (1870)?
8. Does not the Jesuit Order seek to rid the world of Muslims and Jews in accordance with the words of Jesuit Francis Xavier as recorded in ex-Jesuit. Dr. E. Boyd Barrett’s Rome Stoops to Conquer (1935) on page 180 that states:
“The spirit of the Order can be gleaned from the extraordinary prayer of the greatest of Jesuit saints, Francis Xavier: ‘Put me some place where there are no Jews or Moslems,’ cried Francis.”
9. Is the purpose of the Order in attempting to destroy Protestantism and claim Jerusalem for the Order still in effect, as Loyola sought to set up his headquarters in Jerusalem during his presence there in the 1520s?
10. Did the Jesuit Order perfect the tenets of Socialist-Communism on their 59 Paraguayan Reductions in South America (1609-1759)?
11. Why did Pope Clement XIV suppress and extinguish the Society of Jesus in 1773?
12. Was not the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars a result of the Suppression and Extinction of the Society in 1773?
These are a few of the most important questions.
Lord Bless,
Brother Eric Read more at www.vaticanassassins.org | 
No comments:
Post a Comment