ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT
The Cowboy Byte
Today's Featured Article:
Fast and Furious: Eric Holder’s bizarre House Judiciary testimony
Today's Cowboy Headlines:
Fast and Furious: Eric Holder’s bizarre House Judiciary testimony
Today's Cowboy Headlines:
- Preach It: Romney Says Obama’s Economic Policies a “Moral Failure of Tragic Proportions”…
- Wind-energy tax credit in focus
- Obama Admin Gives $445 Million To Group Run By Former ACORN Director…
- For Second Time This Week Jill Biden Hints Joe May Run For President…..
- Natural gas outlook: Futures market trends slightly higher
- NFU unhappy with 2013 House Agriculture Appropriations Bill
- A trip through history with horse racing’s Triple Crown
- Mexican Families to Sue ATF Over Fast and Furious
- Poll Shows Majority of Americans Want Health Care Law Overturned
- Bernanke: US is facing “fiscal cliff”
- National Anthem is an “Abomination” ?
- Good news: Pretty much everything counts as a “green job” now
- The gift the Greatest Generation gave us
- Obama Spends Record Amount of Time Fundraising: Hits 153rd Fundraiser Since Announcing Reelection Bid, Bush Did Only 79 At Same Point In His Presidency…
- GOP Plan Boosts Pentagon, Cuts Social Programs
- Outrage as 9/11 Defense Counsel Insists Women Cover Themselves
- Report: CIA Foils Another al-Qaida Bomb Plot Aboard US-Bound Jet
- NFU leads request urging Senate to bring Farm Bill to floor vote
- Sen. Ayotte: I’m more qualified for presidency than Obama was in ’08
- Rubio says Obama of 2008 is ‘gone,’ makes case for Romney amid VP buzz
WND News Alerts
| City smacks Christian school with mind-blowing fees |
A
city that double-billed churches and a Christian school – but not
synagogues and mosques – for utilities has stopped the unfair practice,
but altered its rate structure to specifically target the Christian
school that blew the whistle on the practice with an extra $240,000 in
coming fees.
Is this the new three-Rs? Revenue, revenge and retaliation? |
| Read the latest now on WND.com. |
| Plus! |
Chinese
companies apparently have a covert capability to remotely access
communications technology sold to the United States and other Western
countries and could “disable a country’s telecommunications
infrastructure before a military engagement,” according to former and
current intelligence sources.
Suddenly, all those cheap Chinese electronics don't seem so cheap ...
|
| Click here for details. |
| Armed revolt against socialist government for attacks on Catholicism |
A
group of citizens decides to stand up against the government for its
laws against the Catholic church. It's even gotten so bad that ...
|
| Click here for details. |
| Must Read News |
|
| Other Highlights |
|
| Make WND your homepage today! |
| Daily Blessing |
|
Your daily dose of spiritual inspiration Today's Scripture reading from the Holy Bible |
| Joke Of The Day |
| Today's Poll |
Where Is The Outrage?
For the past few weeks, I have been writing in this column about the government's use of drones and challenging their constitutionality on Fox News Channel where I work. I once asked on air what Thomas Jefferson would have done if -- had drones existed at the time -- King George III had sent drones to peer inside the bedroom windows of Monticello. I suspect that Jefferson and his household would have trained their muskets on the drones and taken them down. I offer this historical anachronism as a hypothetical only, not as one who is urging the use of violence against the government.
Nevertheless, what Jeffersonians are among us today? When drones take pictures of us on our private property and in our homes, and the government uses the photos as it wishes, what will we do about it? Jefferson understood that when the government assaults our privacy and dignity, it is the moral equivalent of violence against us. The folks who hear about this, who either laugh or groan, cannot find it humorous or boring that their every move will be monitored and photographed by the government.
Don't believe me that this is coming? The photos that the drones will take may be retained and used or even distributed to others in the government so long as the "recipient is reasonably perceived to have a specific, lawful governmental function" in requiring them. And for the first time since the Civil War, the federal government will deploy military personnel inside the United States and publicly acknowledge that it is deploying them "to collect information about U.S. persons."
It gets worse. If the military personnel see something of interest from a drone, they may apply to a military judge or "military commander" for permission to conduct a physical search of the private property that intrigues them. And, any "incidentally acquired information" can be retained or turned over to local law enforcement. What's next? Prosecutions before military tribunals in the U.S.?
The quoted phrases above are extracted from a now-public 30-page memorandum issued by President Obama's Secretary of the Air Force on April 23, 2012. The purpose of the memorandum is stated as "balancing ... obtaining intelligence information ... and protecting individual rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution..." Note the primacy of intelligence gathering over freedom protection, and note the peculiar use of the word "balancing."
When liberty and safety clash, do we really expect the government to balance those values? Of course not. The government cannot be trusted to restrain itself in the face of individual choices to pursue happiness. That's why we have a Constitution and a life-tenured judiciary: to protect the minority from the liberty-stealing impulses of the majority. And that's why the Air Force memo has its priorities reversed -- intelligence gathering first, protecting freedom second -- and the mechanism of reconciling the two -- balancing them -- constitutionally incorrect.
Everyone who works for the government swears to uphold the Constitution. It was written to define and restrain the government. According to the Declaration of Independence, the government's powers come from the consent of the governed. The government in America was not created by a powerful king reluctantly granting liberty to his subjects. It was created by free people willingly granting limited power to their government -- and retaining that which they did not delegate.
The Declaration also defines our liberties as coming from our Creator, as integral to our humanity and as inseparable from us, unless we give them up by violating someone else's liberties. Hence the Jeffersonian and constitutional beef with the word "balancing" when it comes to government power versus individual liberty.
The Judeo-Christian and constitutionally mandated relationship between government power and individual liberty is not balance. It is bias -- a bias in favor of liberty. All presumptions should favor the natural rights of individuals, not the delegated and seized powers of the government. Individual liberty, not government power, is the default position because persons are immortal and created in God's image, and governments are temporary and based on force.
Hence my outrage at the coming use of drones -- some as small as golf balls -- to watch us, to listen to us and to record us. Did you consent to the government having that power? Did you consent to the American military spying on Americans in America? I don't know a single person who has, but I know only a few who are complaining.
If we remain silent when our popularly elected government violates the laws it has sworn to uphold and steals the freedoms we elected it to protect, we will have only ourselves to blame when Big Brother is everywhere. Somehow, I doubt my father's generation fought the Nazis in World War II only to permit a totalitarian government to flourish here.
Is President Obama prepared to defend this? Is Gov. Romney prepared to challenge it? Are you prepared for its consequences?
Personal Liberty Alerts
| Latest From Chip Wood | June 8, 2012 |
|
|||||
| Freedom Watch | |||||
|
|||||
| Personal Liberty News | |||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
| Chip Shots | |||||
|
Feds To Florida: Stop No fair purging the voter rolls. Officials in Florida believe that as many as 182,000 non-citizens may be on the voter rolls in the Sunshine State. So Republican Governor Rick Scott ordered election officials to identify any ineligible names and purge them from the list. Now, however, the U.S. Department of Justice has ordered the process stopped. It says it must approve in advance any changes in voter-registration procedures. The Feds can't allow any discrimination regarding who gets to vote — especially with major elections coming up in a few months. More » |
|||||
Falkland Islanders to Obama: Falk Off
While Obama carefully played the smiling politician as he recorded a message to the Queen of England for her Diamond Jubilee, his administration was in Bolivia for the annual meeting of the Organisation of American States (OAS) working to undermine Great Britain. The United States is part of the OAS General Assembly, which has just officially re-adopted the 2010 “Declaration on the Question of the Malvinas Islands.” This declaration supports and backs Argentina’s request for negotiations to take place between Buenos Aires and London over the Falkland Islands.
However, the Island’s inhabitants are not so appreciative of the Obama administrations backing of this declaration or the declaration itself as they more than ninety five percent are British and wish to remain as such. They do not want to be ruled by Argentina, yet Obama and the OAS are disregarding the inhabitants desire to remain under British rule. The United States foreign policy has long been known for interfering and getting involved in situations they have no business being in and this is yet another prime example of that. Rather than allowing the inhabitants of the land to decide whose control they fall under, the Obama administration has taken it upon themselves to make that decision on their behalf. Not only is it a slap in the face of the Falkland Islanders, it also undermines the relationship between Great Britain and America.
David Cameron had a series of talks with the White House in March of this year, and was repeatedly assured that the Obama administration would stay out of the Falkland Island sovereignty issue and cease pressing for negotiations. However, those assurances, much like every other promise made by Obama, were proved worthless as the OAS, with the support of the United States, readopted the Declaration. This is yet another issue that the American government needs to stay out of and allow the Falkland Islanders to decide their own sovereignty. To even expect Great Britain to be amenable to talks with Argentina is ludicrous enough, but to declare the United States’ position as neutral as Obama did just last month and then turn around and support the Declaration is beyond ridiculous.
With the help of Great Britain, the Falkland Islands were liberated from the Argentinean invasion in 1982. Over two hundred and fifty British soldiers were killed in the fight. This is one fight the United States government needs to stay out of and allow Great Britain and the Falkland Islanders to determine their future. Argentina’s current President Kirchner Cristina Fernández de Kirchner is well known for continuing the socialist policies progressed by her husband as he held office from 2003-2007, perhaps Obama sees a worthy friend in Argentina’s first female president. And, just as Argentina is facing upwards of twenty five percent inflation, America can soon expect the same with the expected announcement of QE3 happening shortly, failed foreign policy and intervention and unrestricted spending, printing of worthless fiat money and unrelenting debt. Just as the Falkland Islanders are telling Obama to falk off, so, too, should America.
Breaking News from Western Journalism
Jun 08, 2012 02:00 pm | Doug Book
Wiretap
applications obtained by the House Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform prove Attorney General Eric Holder and Assistant AG
Lanny Breuer lied to Committee members when they claimed DOJ personnel
knew nothing of the tactics used by the ATF… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 01:51 pm | Kris Zane
Jun 08, 2012 01:42 pm | Paul G. Kengor
Editor’s
note: A longer version of this article first appeared at American
Spectator.
The left-leaning magazine The Nation has published a list of what it
deems America’s all-time, most influential progressives. The list, which
you can review for yourself, is very revealing.
For starters,… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 01:37 pm | Daniel Noe
Jun 08, 2012 01:31 pm | Breaking News
Well,
I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill
3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with
particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law. I was
frankly… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 01:28 pm | Daniel Noe
Jun 08, 2012 01:27 pm | Donn Dears
It’s
an amazing irony that the only technology that could have any chance of
cutting CO2 emissions from the generation of electricity 80% by 2050 is
being ostracized by environmentalists.
One of their reasons for opposing nuclear power is fear… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 01:17 pm | Daniel Noe
Jun 08, 2012 01:03 pm | David Lane
Framing
the election to Christians around Mitt Romney For President is a
mistake from my perspective. Steve Deace and Matt Barber both have it
“Framed Wrong” in my judgment; barring a miracle, the Romney campaign
political triangulation strategy gets him… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 12:56 pm | Daniel Noe
Jun 08, 2012 12:55 pm | Breaking News
A
former Justice Department attorney says purely political considerations
have motivated the DOJ to order the state of Florida to stop purging
foreigners from its voter rolls.
Recently the state of Florida discovered 53,000 dead people registered
to vote. Florida… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 12:50 pm | Breaking News
They
started with salt and transfat. Now they’re going after 16-ounce
drinks, but it won’t stop there. You can count on it. Prohibition didn’t
work, and neither does the “war on drugs.” So don’t expect banning
certain foods or large… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 12:22 pm | Breaking News
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) endorsed Mitt Romney on Thursday night but said his father would remain his “first pick.”
“My first choice had always been my father. I campaigned for him when I was 11 years old. He’s still my… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 11:49 am | Breaking News
Somewhere
between the time in October 2010 he threatened to sue Patrick Frey and
the decision last week to make a similar threat toward Ali Akbar, Brett
Kimberlin crossed a Rubicon of desperation and burned the bridge behind
him. In… Continue to Post
Jun 08, 2012 11:37 am | Breaking News
With
the Wisconsin recall election in the news, it is only fitting that we
take a trip down memory lane. Anyone remember those Democrat senators
fleeing to Illinois to prevent a quorum so the the Senate couldn’t pass
Governor Walker’s… Continue to Post
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)