One of the awful side effects of abortion –- even ignoring the slaughter of unborn human life involved -- is the cavalier attitude it creates toward human life in general.
So it should be no surprise to anyone when recently the so-called Journal of Medical Ethics, based in London, published a study advocating "post-birth abortion."
I'm not making this up.
These self-proclaimed "ethicists" (who I should point out have all already survived the womb themselves) actually argue that parents should be given a kind of "trial period" of unspecified time in which to change their mind and eliminate their baby.
Now not surprisingly, a huge outcry of protest has arisen against this wholly barbaric proposal.
Do you know how the authors defended their arguments?
They simply applied the Planned Parenthood / National Abortion Rights Action League mantra.
They argued that if you accept the abortionists' claim that what they do is ethical under any circumstance, then nothing really changes right after a baby is born.
And you know . . . intellectually, they're right.
If it really is OK to kill a child the month before his birth, or three months before birth, or by partial birth abortion, how do they make a distinction? Why is there any difference in killing one right AFTER birth?
Killing babies is killing babies.
Of course, given the obvious horror, I don't think it's necessary to argue why the advocates of "post-birth abortion" are wrong.
But that is why it is vital that you and I do all we can to force Congress to vote on, and ultimately pass, the Life at Conception Act to reverse Roe V. Wade and ultimately end abortion-on-demand.
For Life,
Martin Fox, President
National Pro-Life Alliance
P.S. If you have a few minutes, I think you'll be inspired by the story of one of those people that the post-birth abortionists would do away with. www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=9xwCG0Ey2Mg
Also, please consider chipping in with a contribution by clicking here. Your National Pro-Life Alliance is entirely dependent on voluntary contributions to keep our vital programs running. We receive no government funding.
Because of NPLA's tax-exempt status under IRC Sec. 501(c)(4) and its state and federal legislative activities, contributions are not tax deductible as charitable contributions (IRC § 170) or as business deductions (IRC § 162(e)(1)). Privacy Policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment