Best quality life under a giant dome
Reports have been coming in from exploring parties
all over the world that, frankly, will blow your mind.
And this will re-write history. It is being discovered
that early civilized communities lived from the North
Pole to the South Pole (where there is now ice).
And they enjoyed life in
* a moderate warm climate everywhere
* with no winds and storms
* with a continual growing season
* with no encroaching wastelands of desert or ice
* with lush vegetation worldwide
* And they could produce technology that today’s
environment will not permit.
* And, weirdest of all, they lived under a
climate-protected dome.
Outrageous? Yes, but absolutely true!
LIVING UNDER A DOME – HOW?
You ask, how could whole nations live under a huge dome?
Surely that deserves an explanation.
Well, it turns out that, apparently, the earth’s atmosphere
was once surrounded by an outer water canopy which
intercepted the direct rays of the sun. This canopy, or dome,
was natural.
You might well wonder, Can such a phenomenon really
exist?
Indeed. Did you know that canopies are quite common around
the planets of our solar system? The planets
Venus and Jupiter, and also Saturn’s moon, Titan, each
have vapour or cloud canopies completely surrounding
them.
ALMOST UNIFORM GLOBAL TEMPERATURES
Such a canopy would diffuse the sun’s rays all over the
globe. It would give the world a uniform climate.
Incoming solar heat would diffuse so equally over all
zones, that a subtropical climate would prevail from pole
to pole.
The conditions would be like those in a terrarium! The
average temperature would be about 72 degrees Fahrenheit
(22 degrees Celsius).
It would also conserve heat from the sun’s rays by
preventing its loss to outer space. Thus a larger
percentage of the sun’s radiant energy would be absorbed,
uniformly distributed, and retained, than at present.
As the water was in orbit and could not be reached by the
nuclei of condensation that are needed for cloud
formation, rain would be unknown in such conditions. (But
that would later change with the Great Disaster.)
And so, in that early time, there were no upsets in nature.
The earth was very different.
CANOPY INVISIBLE,
FUNCTIONING LIKE A LENSE
This canopy was probably invisible to earth’s inhabitants.
Moreover, it formed a huge orbital lense, causing the stars
to appear larger and much more numerous than they appear to
us today.
The probability of a water blanket around the earth in the
past is put forward seriously by competent men of
science.
For example, in a paper submitted to the Lunar Science
Conference at Houston, Texas, Dr A.E.Ringwood concluded
that the early earth had a massive atmosphere, at a high
enough temperature to evaporate certain elements
collected by the earth as it moved through space.
EFFECT OF THE CANOPY - SUMMARISED
Let’s compare today’s world with the former CANOPIED
environment.
Today, our equatorial zones get the brunt of the sun’s heat.
Polar regions get little heat. Temperatures on this planet
are extreme. As a result of these hot and cold air masses
meeting turbulently, today’s weather patterns and continual
storms are experienced.
But there is geological, botanical and zoological evidence
that this was very different in the past.
Just imagine a controlled terrarium state. Diffused sunlight
and heat would result in:
* a moderate warm climate everywhere
* no winds and storms
* a continual growing season
* no encroaching wastelands of desert or ice
* lush vegetation worldwide
* protection from harmful cosmic radiation.
In fact, our present limited vapour blanket in our
atmosphere is the very thing that makes life possible on
earth today.
Originally, a vast canopy of water above the earth’s
atmosphere must have provided a great protective blanket
for the beautiful earth.
This virtual wall of water filtered or reflected most of
the cosmic and short-wave length radiations that now
reach the earth.
So, you ask, what could the results be? These two
instantly come to mind:
1. Possible longer life spans
2. Possible larger specimens of some plants and
animals.
WORLD’S FIRST HYPERBARIC BIOSPHERE
The atmospheric pressure, as well as the oxygen content,
also had to be greater in the past, in order to support
the huge life forms which then existed.
Let me tell you about my friend Dr. Carl Baugh, of Glen
Rose Texas. This man has set out to build the world’s
first hyperbaric biosphere, 62 feet long. Its purpose is
to simulate the context of our original world.
An engineer from NASA has called it the greatest
experiment in history ever performed in the name of
science.
Among a selection of small creatures placed into an
experimental prototype of this biosphere were two snakes.
It was decided to test the snake venom. Over a period of
time, Carl had the snakes milked three times.
TEST 1: In the first test (before the snakes were placed
in the biosphere) their venom looked like a lump of
spaghetti – all together.
TEST 2: After a period inside the biosphere, the snakes
were milked again. And their venom still looked like
spaghetti – but now the lump was separated.
TEST 3: After a longer time in the biosphere, they were
again milked and their venom examined. It now looked like
honeycomb.
Disorder had been transformed into order.
SNAKE BITE: PROTEIN, NOT POISON
Snake venom viewed with a scanning electron microscope is
gnarled and unstructured. The sulphide bonds in snake
venom produce the toxic agent under such conditions.
But when ultra violet light is eliminated and the
atmosphere pressure is doubled (simulating conditions
that existed in the original world) the venom regains its
structure.
Dr. Baugh believes that in the atmosphere of the original
world, a snake bite would give an injection of protein,
rather than poison. And possibly such pests as mosquitoes
might not have resorted to attacking humans, since they
were satisfied on the nutrients in plants.
LARGER LIFE FORMS DEMAND
GREATER ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE
Have you ever wondered as to how those giant life forms
could ever survive, in the past? You see, the atmospheric
pressure, as well as the oxygen content, would have had
to be greater in the past, in order to support such huge
life forms which then existed.
This would have required some kind of canopy above the
earth. To provide such a quantity of oxygen as required
by the larger life forms, the oxygen would need to
approach the level of toxicity - unless the atmospheric
pressure was greater.
Can you imagine a creature 52 feet long flying through
the air? In West Texas, a fossilised flying reptile,
known as a pterodactyl, has been found, with a wingspan
of 52 feet.
Just think about this, Blaine. There is no way such
a “flying dinosaur” could have flown with today’s
atmospheric pressure. However, with atmospheric pressure
of around 32 pounds per square inch, it would have been a
piece of cake.
Says Dr. Baugh:
“We’ve been doing extensive research into the ancient
atmosphere, the one that produced the fossil record.
“Our research indicates that essentially everything was
larger in the past. For instance, the club mosses which
today reach 16 to 18 inches often approach 200 feet in
the fossil record.
“The great dinosaurs, with their relatively small lung
capacity, reached tremendous stature. Seismosaurus could
reach his head almost seventy feet in the air. Something
has to explain this anomaly in terms of today’s atmosphere.”
CELLS SATURATED WITH OXYGEN
The difference may well be in the atmospheric pressure.
In today’s atmosphere we have 14.7 pounds atmospheric
pressure per inch at sea level. But to oxygenate the deep
cell tissue of these great dinosaurs we need much greater
atmospheric pressure. Research has shown that when you
approach two times today’s atmospheric pressure, the
entire blood plasma is saturated with oxygen.
Research indicates there was about 27 pounds per square
inch of atmospheric pressure [in the past]. That would
beautifully solve a problem even paleontologists admit
exists.
In addition, the oxygen supply in the fossil record has
been found to be 30 percent oxygen compared to 20 percent
today. Ancient air bubbles trapped in amber have been
analysed and revealed this heavier concentration of
oxygen.
COULD YOU RUN 200 MILES?
Baugh notes that “if we had those conditions today, we
could run two hundred miles without fatigue.” How would
you like that?
In summary, the atmosphere possessed
* more carbon-dioxide and
* more oxygen (one of the by-products of
vigorous plant growth).
DIVER’S NASTY WOUND
HEALED FAST
Some time ago, a man inside a bathyscope deep under the
sea had a nasty accident. His hand was badly gashed. But
it was a clean cut, so he pressed the wound shut and
wrapped it around with a cloth.
The surface crew wanted to bring him back up immediately
for treatment, but this was not possible, due to the fact
that the bathyscope was pressurised within, to compensate
for the heavy outside water pressure at that depth.
Gradual decompression would take several hours.
So it was decided that the diver should stay down until
morning.
When he resurfaced, and the bandage was removed, what a
surprise it was to discover the wound well on the way to
being healed!
It seems that the original atmosphere, in the event of an
injury, served to promote faster healing.
CANOPY WOULD PROMOTE
SUCH ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE
Now envision the water canopy around the earth. Think of
the effect this would have upon the atmospheric pressure.
An ancient document, in describing the pre-Flood earth,
speaks of a “firmament” above the earth, encased by
layers of water above and below it. (Genesis 1:7,8)
Approximately eleven miles above the surface of our earth
there exists a heat sink.
It is between –130 degrees Fahrenheit and –180 degrees
Fahrenheit at that elevation. Nearer to the earth it is
warmer, and further from the earth it is warmer for at
least some space.
It is scientifically estimated that the canopy comprised
a 10-to-20-feet thick layer of water, or compressed
hydrogen, extending completely around the earth.
The possibility of such a massive atmospheric envelope
can be taken seriously.
With such a canopy, the air pressure of the world before
the Great Disaster would have been about two times what
it is today.
Do we have evidence of this? Indeed, we do.
SURPRISING EVIDENCE
– A PRE-FLOOD HAMMER
How about this, Blaine? In June, 1934, near London,
Texas, by a waterfall on Red Creek, members of the Hahn
family discovered a rock with wood protruding from it.
They chiselled it open, exposing a hammer head. The
petrified hammer was found in a layer of Cretaceous
sandstone. The handle was fossilised with a blackened
coal tip.
In the 1980s, this artefact was analysed at the Batelle
Laboratories in Columbus, Ohio, the same laboratory that
analysed moonstones. The elemental analysis showed it to
be 96.6 percent iron, 0.74 percent sulphur, and 2.6
percent chlorine.
Physicists tell us that under today’s atmospheric
conditions you cannot compound chlorine with metallic
iron. Yet here it is.
Today, chlorine can be joined with iron as solid metal
only in two atmospheres of oxygen pressure, and only in
the absence of ultraviolet radiation.
Of course, ultraviolet radiation would have been filtered
out by the protective canopy.
Research indications are that the pre-Flood atmosphere is
the only plausible explanation, for the forging of this
metallic artefact.
There is evidence that the oxygen ratio of the atmosphere
was then 30 percent, compared with 21 percent today; and
that the carbon-dioxide ratio was 2 percent, as against
0.035 percent today.
YOU ASK, WHAT CHANGED
THIS EARLY ENVIRONMENT?
ANSWER: The Great Disaster, or, as it is popularly known,
the Great Flood. This was an event of cosmic proportions.
It wiped out the planet and reset all the clocks of
nature.
You know, whenever I lecture on this topic, people raise
some brilliant questions. Here are few of them.
QUESTION 1: On a nice bright cloudless day put on the
scuba gear and slowly descend in clear ocean water. As
you go down you will notice it getting darker and darker.
At 650 feet (200meters) down, there's not enough light
for photosynthesis.
So if the earth’s mythic water blanket existed, no light
would penetrate below 200 meters to allow plants to survive.
But flood apologists need the "earth blanket" of water to
be at least 2 00 meters to cover the earth in flood
water.
ANSWER: Firstly, the "earth blanket" of water did NOT
need to be at least 200 meters to later cover the earth
in flood water.
If we were to amass the amounts of water present on Earth,
and assimilate the greater amount of water within the earth,
this would leave the approximate remainder of a 10-to-20-
feet thick lineal dimension double
encasement of water in solid crystalline form as the
canopy. Not 200 feet.
Secondly, such a canopy would not decrease the amount of
light shining upon the earth below. Rather, it would
function as an invisible lense around the planet,
enhancing the reception of light.
QUESTION 2: If the uv rays from the sun are kept from
reaching the earth, then how would plants be able to
photosynthesize?
If the ancient atmosphere blocked uv a, b, and c. then how
did humans synthesize vitamin D? Individuals lacking adequate
amounts of this essential vitamin are far from healthy, and
would have a hard time living until 50, much less 1000.
Without daily exposure to the uv b rays from the sun our
bodies do not synthesize vitamin D. The only way to supplement
this is through seafood, milk products, egg yolks, organ
meats, and bone meal - things like that; all carnivorous.
There are no known vegetal sources.
ANSWER: The Pre-Flood canopy filtered out "harmful" uv
radiation, while permitting beneficial light rays through.
The "harmful" portion of us is uva. This wavelength is
extremely short. Uvb and uvc have longer wavelengths,
which could penetrate the water of the canopy much
easier. It is the b and c range, which benefit the skin,
assist in the generation of vitamin D, and aid in
photosynthesis.
QUESTION 3: The same Question 2 could apply to vitamin
B12, and the omega 3 fatty acids EPA (Eicosapentaenoic
Acid), and DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid). Where did we get
these essentials in the paradise world?
ANSWER: Their assimilation would be assisted by the uvb
and uvc.
QUESTION 4: If the sun's light was transmitted fiber-
optically by the canopy from the daylight side of the
earth, around the curve of the canopy, to the darker
night-time side of the earth, providing a subdued pink
light at night, as you state, how could the stars still
be visible (even in their magnified state they would
still be vastly dimmed)?
ANSWER: The canopy was transparent. It would thus be
invisible, forming a huge orbital lense. The nature of
the physics in the canopy would give a "photo-multiplier"
effect; hence the stars could be seen with greater
clarity than they are today.
QUESTION 5: Also, how could anyone get a good night's
sleep! The human body needs complete darkness in order to
get a full night's sleep - for the brain to cycle through
the various waveforms necessary for growth, repair, and
rejuvination.
ANSWER: The neurotransmitters generated in the brain by
dominance of magenta light compensate in all these areas.
More peaceful rest actually results.
QUESTION 6: There is also the issue of flowering plants –
a certain amount of complete darkness is needed in order
for the plants to accurately set their calendars, even a
nearby streetlight, or a brief flash of the lights on
then off again would disrupt their clocks.
ANSWER: The "relative darkness" balanced by the gentle
glow of magenta in the early a.m. hours would actually
enhance plant production. This can be shown
experimentally.
QUESTION 7: What about certain nocturnal animals? Like
the plants, even a small amount of light prevents them
from entering their "active" phase (our daytime).
I used to do shark research, and the observation tank had
around 30 sharks (nurse, reef, white tip, blue...) and a
number of other tropical fish. In the beginning (before I
got there) they used to turn off all of the lights each
night when the zoo closed. Every morning they would find
a new, expensive, tropical fish carcass (or pieces
thereof) floating in the cage. The culprit was the lemon
shark, and by turning out the lights they were allowing
it to enter its nocturnal day or active hunting time.
Only by keeping the shark tank partially lit at all times,
and never allowing it to become completely dark, were
they able to avoid having to move the lemon shark to
a separate tank all its own.
ANSWER: The "gentle" magenta hues of the night hours
would balance these nocturnal habits.
QUESTION 8: This concerns the snake venom. Why would the
ancient snakes inject a beneficial protein matrix, rather
than venom? What purpose would this serve?
ANSWER: With the onset of physical degeneration, various
maladies would befall mankind and other living creatures.
Injection of this beneficial protein matrix (with its
extremely complicated structure) would aid in recovery.
Wow! What a fascinating subject! And, Blaine, this
is not fantasy – but our real planet Earth the way it
used to be.
You and I now live on a damaged planet. But it was not
always so. Wouldn’t you love to look in at that ancient
world?
To discover more, I invite you to visit with me at
http://www.beforeus.com/first.php
Hope this information is helpful.
Thanks again for being on my list.
Sincere best wishes
Jonathan Gray
info@archaeologyanswers.com
See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a1ksoj
No comments:
Post a Comment