ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Video: Obama Has Signed 923 Executive Orders In 40 Months

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION: Obama has signed 923 Executive Orders in 40 months!
What did Congress do in those 40 months?
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates theof all persons. Postmaster General to operate a national registration
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
-EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Feel free to verify the “executive orders” at will… and these are just the major ones…
I’m sure you’ve all heard the tale of the “Frog in the Pot”… you all comfortable???
Watch Obama’s actions, not his words! By his actions he will show you where America is headed.
When it comes to Barack Obama, one of the most important things to understand is that he is a committed globalist.  He firmly believes that more “global governance” (the elite don’t like to use the term “global government”) will make the world a much better place.  Throughout his time in the White House, Obama has consistently sought to strengthen international institutions such as the UN, the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO.  At every turn, Obama has endeavored to more fully integrate America into the “global community”.  Since he was elected, Obama has signed a whole host of new international economic agreements.  He regularly speaks of the need for “cooperation” among global religions and he has hosted a wide variety of different religious celebrations at the White House.  Obama once stated that “all nations must come together to build a stronger global regime”.  If you do not want to live in a “global regime” that is just too bad.  To globalists such as Obama, it is inevitable that the United States of America will be merged into the emerging global system.  Just this week, Obama has issued a new executive order that seeks to “harmonize” U.S. economic regulations with the rest of the world.  This new executive order is yet another incremental step that is pushing us closer to a North American Union and a one world economic system.  Unfortunately, most Americans have absolutely no idea what is happening.
The American people need to understand that Barack Obama is constantly looking for ways to integrate the United States more deeply with the rest of the world.  The globalization of the world economy has accelerated under Obama, and this latest executive order represents a fundamental change in U.S. economic policy.  Now federal regulators will be required to “harmonize” their work with the international community.  The following is how this new executive order was assessed in a recent Businessweek article….

Obama’s order provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global regulatory official said today.
“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators by directing them to take the international implications of their work into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation, said in an e-mailed statement.
Members of the Obama administration are touting this as a way to “reduce regulation”, but the truth is that this is much more about aligning ourselves with the rest of the world than anything else.
Obama’s “Information Czar”, Cass Sunstein, authored a piece in the Wall Street Journal on Monday in which he stressed the need to eliminate “unnecessary regulatory differences across nations” so that the United States can compete more effectively in our “interdependent global economy”.  The end result of this process will be that we will now do things much more like how the rest of the world does things….
In an interdependent global economy, diverse regulations can cause trouble for companies doing business across national boundaries. Unnecessary differences in countries’ regulatory requirements can cost money, compromising economic growth and job creation. Think of divergent requirements for car headlights, or the labeling of food, or standards for container sizes.
Recognizing this, President Obama’s Jobs Council has called for U.S. agencies to better align U.S. regulations with those of our major trading partners. And today the president is issuing an executive order, “Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation,” with a simple goal: to promote exports, growth, and job creation by eliminating unnecessary regulatory differences across nations.
But a one world economic system is not going to arrive overnight.  Initially, it is much more likely that there will be a very strong push toward North American integration first.  The goal will be to shape North America into an integrated regional economic unit similar to the EU.  Cass Sunstein discussed how this new executive order will affect North American integration on the White House website on Tuesday….
The new Executive Order will build on work that is already underway. We have started close to home, with President Obama launching Regulatory Cooperation Councils with Prime Minister Harper of Canada and President Calderon of Mexico. The Councils are implementing work plans to eliminate or prevent the creation of unnecessary regulatory differences that adversely affect cross-border trade; to streamline regulatory requirements; and to promote greater certainty for the general public and businesses, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises, in the regulation of food, pharmaceuticals, nanotechnology, and other areas. The United States and Canada released the United States-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) Joint Action Plan last December. In February, we announced the United States-Mexico High-Level Regulatory Cooperation Council (HLRCC) Work Plan.
Most Americans have absolutely no idea how far plans to integrate the United States, Canada and Mexico have advanced.
Last year, Barack Obama signed an agreement to create a “North American security perimeter” and most Americans never even heard about it because the mainstream news networks almost entirely ignored it.
But this is exactly what the globalists want.  They don’t want people to become alarmed by these moves toward North American integration.  In fact, a document uncovered by Wikileaks shows that those involved in the effort to integrate North America believe that an “incremental” approach is best.  Apparently they believe that small moves toward integration are less likely to alarm the general population.  The following is from an article that appeared in The National Post last year….
The integration of North America’s economies would best be achieved through an “incremental” approach, according to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable.
The cable, released through the WikiLeaks website and apparently written Jan. 28, 2005, discusses some of the obstacles surrounding the merger of the economies of Canada, the United States and Mexico in a fashion similar to the European Union.
“An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers,” the document said. “The economic payoff of the prospective North American initiative … is available, but its size and timing are unpredictable, so it should not be oversold.”
If the people of Canada, the United States and Mexico were told that there was a plan to merge all three economies, there might be massive protests to stop it, and the globalists do not want that.
A few years ago, the “Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America” (SPP) that was being promoted by President George W. Bush started to generate quite a bit of negative publicity.  That caused those seeking to integrate the economies of North America to back off for a little while.
But as an article by Jerome Corsi last year detailed, the eventual goal is to turn North America into another version of the eurozone.  That includes a common currency for North America called the “amero”….
The SPP in the administration of President George W. Bush appeared designed to replicate the steps taken in Europe over a 50-year period following the end of World War II to transform an economic agreement under the European Common Market into a full-fledged regional government, operating as the European Union, with its own currency, the euro, functioning as the sole legitimate currency in what has become known as “the eurozone.”
The concern under the SPP has been that the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, could be evolved into a regional government, the North American Union, with a regional currency, the amero, designed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar.
So will we ever see the “amero” replace the U.S. dollar?
Hopefully not.
If the globalists try to introduce the “amero”, it would probably be after a horrible financial crisis in which the U.S. dollar falls apart.  The “amero” would be heralded as the “solution” to the problems that were plaguing the dollar.
If there ever is a move to get rid of the U.S. dollar for an international currency of some kind, the American people will need to resist it with all of their might.
The more integrated the world becomes, the more likely it becomes that we will see nightmarish global tyranny someday.  It is very frightening to think of what someone very evil might do if they had the chance to run the entire planet.
Once our national sovereignty is gone, it will be incredibly difficult to get back.  If the American people don’t take a stand while they still can, their children may wake up someday as citizens of a very oppressive “global regime”.

Rand Paul's endorsement of Mitt Romney explained

Emergency Opposition to Pro-Abortion Judge

National Pro-Lifiance

At our request, Senator Rand Paul last week agreed to lead a filibuster against Obama's latest pro-abortion Judicial Nominee.

Now Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) has filed cloture on this disastrous nomination of Andrew Hurwitz to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

That means that a vote on his nomination is set to happen late Monday.

Hurwitz is commonly known as "the architect" of Roe v. Wade for his role in the decision that opened the door to the killing to date of more than 56 million unborn babies.

Roe represents one of the most blatant disregards for the U.S. Constitution and our founding principles in American History.

Yet today, Mr. Hurwitz gladly takes pride in his role in crafting the decision that provided the underlining arguments for Roe.

Hurwitz proudly recounts how he was referred to as "the clerk who wrote the Newman opinion," the decision that served as the basis for Roe, when he went on to apply for clerkships at the Supreme Court.

Please take a moment ot call your senators today and ask them to vote against the nomination of David Hurwitz.   The capitol switchboard number is (202) 224-3121.

Both of your senators must hear from you today, whether or not you believe they are pro-life advocates or not.

Sen. John Kyle (R-Arizona) for example is inexplicably supporting the Hurwitz nomination apparently just because Hurwitz is from his home state.   The same goes for Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona).  They must hear from you!

So no matter who your senators are, call and ask them to stand strong against "the architect" of Roe, Andrew David Hurwitz.

This is one of the most important pro-life votes coming up in the senate.   Remember to pray for it, and please make sure to take the time to let your voice be heard.  Again, the Capitol switchboard is (202) 224-3121.

Here is the action item:

1. Call the Capitol switchboard: (202) 224-3121

2. Ask to speak to your senators: Urge them to oppose the nomination of "the architect" of Roe, Andrew David Hurwitz to the Ninth Circuit.

For Life,
Martin Fox
Martin Fox, President
National Pro-Life Alliance

P.S. If you can, please chip in with a contribution by clicking here. Your National Pro-Life Alliance is entirely dependent on voluntary contributions to keep our vital programs running. We receive no government funding.

Information On Mormonism For Romney Voters


Additional Information:
  See products on Mormonism
Products on Mormonism:
BOOKS TRACTS & COMICS VIDEOS
See also:
  • Answers To My Mormon Friends
 
 

In this eye-opening DVD, high Mormon leaders admit to doctrines most people don't know are part of the religion. Learn more...

Romney Is: 'America's Disastrous Choice'

by Pastor Don Elmore


Scripture Reading: Galatians 5:17-21
What is wrong with the Christians in America?  Have they lost their minds?  Where is the uproar of their disapproval over who the candidates are for President?  It’s like all the mistakes made in the 9/11 diabolical and still most Americans believe that it was the nasty Muslims that flew the planes into the towers.  It doesn’t matter to most Americans that building #7 came down at around 5:30 PM that same day in the same manner as the two twin towers; free falling (47 stories in 6 ½ seconds) and the building was not hit by any airplane!
Does speaking the truth make one an enemy in America?  It apparently is in this former Protestant land.  And so is this Scripture:
“But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who secretly shall bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.  And many shall follow their pernicious ways, by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of;” 2 Peter 2:1, 2.
As prophesied by Lord Cornwallis at the treaty meeting at the end of the Revolutionary War, the churches of America would “be used to teach the Jew’s religion.”  It been over two hundred years since these words were first spoken, but this prophecy has been proven true.  Almost all of the churches of America are teaching doctrines which are suicidal and opposite to what was taught in Christianity just a few generations ago.
For over two centuries, Satan has carefully built up his earthly beast kingdom with its centerpiece being Zionism.  This Judaic nation-state has its political and economic apparatus in the cities of Tel Aviv (Israeli), London (England), Washington, D.C. (USA), and New York City (USA).  Its spiritual capital is in the city of earthly Jerusalem (Israeli), with religious offshoots in Rome (the Vatican, Italy), New York City (Judaism, NYC), Nashville, Tennessee (evangelical Zionists, USA), San Francisco, California (Wicca and New Age, USA), and Salt Lake City, Utah (Mormons, USA).
Bible prophecy speaks of “Mystery, Babylon the Great” which encompasses the whole globe. This is World Jewry, the whore of Babylon, and yet the whore has many daughters. These many daughters fornicate with the beast (the Jewish serpent) and give the beast power and strength.

Mormon Church a Whorish Daughter

One of these notorious and whorish daughters of the beast is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (LDS), also called the Mormons.  Now the genius of the Mormons is that while this church is thoroughly Zionist and Judaic, it has all the artificial trappings of a false Christianity.  The Mormon Church, some fifteen million strong, comes complete with a counterfeit New Testament (The Book of Mormon), a counterfeit “Jesus,” and it even teaches of a coming, earth-based “New Jerusalem.”
We will discuss the strange translation of the Book of Mormon from the golden plates in Pennsylvania and New York; this “translation” took about three years and there was something mysterious about what happened in the early translation of the book. But how did Joseph Smith translate the hieroglyphics that no one knew in the 1820s or even knows today; more about that later?
In reality, the Mormon Church, currently headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, is nothing less than an anti-Christian and very blasphemous arm of World Jewry.  It is a Judaic cult.  As such, the Jewish rabbis cooperate fully with the Salt Lake City religious elite in helping the Mormons achieve their earthly goals.  Indeed, the real goal of the Mormon Church is to exalt physical Israeli as God’s Chosen People and to establish an  Edomite or Khazarian led global empire.  At the helm of that empire, the Mormons believe, will be what they call a Hebrew [but will actually be an Edomite or Khazarian] King.
In summary, Mormonism is Judaism, and Judaism is Mormonism. But there is more. The Mormon Church is a Freemasonic creation.  Its founder, Joseph Smith and the majority of its leaders were Freemasons, and its rituals and doctrines are essentially Masonic.  Likewise, Freemasonry is itself a Judaic cult which honors the Jewish Kabbalah as its doctrinal and ritualistic source.  Bingham Young met Albert Pike in Iowa and had discussions with him about the Masonic plan to take over the United States.
And thus we arrive at another conclusion:
  1. Mormonism,
  2. Freemasonry, and
  3. Judaism are three integrated components, interlinked and inseparable. All three are antichrist in nature, and serpent-led in spiritual sustenance. They are Satan’s Zionist Army.

The Real Jesus Has No Place in these Three Groups

In Judaism, the name of Jesus is blasphemed and spat upon. In Freemasonry, the name of Jesus is never honored, and it is made clear to Masons that Jesus is not God.  In contrast, in the Mormon cult, “Jesus” is honored, but the Mormon “Jesus” is not the Jesus of the New Testament.  In order to seduce and deceive, the Mormons introduce to the masses “another Jesus” and “another gospel” (II Corinthians 11:4); in other words, a counterfeit.
This counterfeit Jesus, say the founders of Mormonism and also today’s hierarchy in Salt Lake City, is only one of many millions of gods. The Mormon Jesus is said to be the “spiritual brother of Lucifer.”  Indeed, someday, the Mormons teach, Lucifer will be redeemed and he, too, shall become a god.
Jesus, the Mormons claim, was a mere man who “earned” his godhood, and so did the Father God worshipped by the Mormons.  He, too, was once a man, and his Father—who resides on a star called “Kolob”—has many, many wives whom he sexually copulates with and produces countless more spiritual children, male and female.  Each of these countless, male spiritual children can someday become a “god” over their very own star-planet.

Jesus a Polygamist with Many Wives

Thus, “Jesus,” whom the Mormons say is also a polygamist, is “god” ONLY of planet earth, not of the whole universe.  And the good news for Mormon males is that they, too, if faithful to the false Church founded by the Mason, Joseph Smith, will earn for themselves their own star-planet, where they will reign as a monarch, copulating happily with their harem of wives and producing even more little deities.  Joseph Smith believed he was an actual descendant of Jesus.

Jewish Rabbis Love the Mormon "Jesus"

Can you imagine how pleased and ecstatic the fiendish Jewish rabbis are over the success of Mormonism?  They are seeing a Judeo-Masonic cult steeped in Kabbalistic doctrine and practices growing in numbers like frogs after a summer storm.
The rabbis must stand in awe to see this Judeo-Masonic cult present the most outlandish and preposterous of counterfeit Jesus', a “Jesus” stripped of His universal Deity and made out to be a sex-crazed god with his own female harem.
The rabbis know that in their Talmud, the most holy book of Judaism, Jesus is labeled a blasphemer and a sexual magician and pervert.  Oh the joy they must experience to discover that in the Mormon cult, Jesus is described as a minor god of one teensy planet out of trillions in the galaxy and that this minor deity, Jesus, is said to have been produced by the sex act between Mary and the Father God.
This is a cosmic joke that the rabbis must gleefully relish.  It’s enough to cause the Hasidic Jews in their black garb and cobra curls dangling from under their weird black hats to hold hands and dance like whirling devils.
“Oy vey, I love that Mormon Jesus,”the rabbis scream out in ecstasy. “He’s almost as depraved as the Talmudic Jesus we Jews love to hate,”they cry out, doubling over with laughter.—Tex Marrs, from his web site, Why the Jewish Rabbis Love the Mormon Church.

Rothschild's Have Given Us Two Equally Disqualified Choices for President

As we approach the date for the election of the President of the United States, we come to the conclusion that the Rothschild’s have given America no good choice on who to vote for, either, it is:
  1.  Barak Obama—Democrat, who if elected for a second term will led America to be a Communist/Zionist nation, or
  2.  Mitt Romney—Republican, who if elected will be the Zionist’s #1 man and will lead America to be a Mormon/Freemason/Zionist nation. 
As former Presidential Candidate George Wallace use to say, “There is not a dime’s worth of difference between the Democratic and Republican Parties.”  It is probably down to a penny now:  “There is not a penny’s worth of difference between the Democratic and Republican Parties.  In many ways, Mitt Romney is worse than the race-mixed Obama.
One of the most powerful organizations in the world is the Freemasons.  Almost all the Presidents of the United States were Freemasons; many Senators and Representatives, CEOs and other officers.  And did you know that Trayvon Martin’s father is a big-time South Florida Freemason?  On his Facebook account there are hundreds of pictures of Tracy Martin (Trayvon’s father) dressed in the outlandish uniforms of the Freemasons.  But the media has kept this quiet about Tracy’s affiliation.  Now you know one of the main reasons that his son, Trayvon, caught so much attention in the national news.

The Greatest Fraud Ever Perpretrated Against the People of the United States

What have they kept quiet about in the National Election Race?  Will they discuss what family God made an unconditional covenant with and to whom He chose “to be a special people unto Himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth?”  No.  Nor will they discuss the important issues of this election.  We will discuss three of the many issues that will be discussed in this sermon about why this election is absurd to any Christian:
  1.  Both Barak Obama and Mitt Romney are not NATURAL BORN CITIZENS and therefore are constitutionally disqualified from ever being President. Do you remember when Barak Obama or Barry Soetoro, or Barry Dunham or Barack Dunham ran for President in 2008?  He first defeated Hilary Clinton and then took on Republican candidate John McCain.  Why didn’t John McCain take up the argument about his opponent’s birth certificate?  John McCain was born on August 29, 1936 in Colon Hospital, Colon Panama.  The interesting part of this is that Colon Panama, the birth city on McCain’s birth certificate is not a part of the Canal Zone.   Therefore, John McCain is not a natural-born Citizen as he was not born on United States Territory or in the United States of America and is not eligible for the Presidency with the United States constitution; Article II, Section One, Clause 5.
    “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.”
    Remember that Obama’s father was a Kenyan national visiting the United States.  He was a British citizen.  Under the British Nationality Act of 1948, Obama was born with dual citizenship and forever ineligible to run for President.
    United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898):
    “At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of PARENTS who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.  These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
    To be a NATURAL BORN CITZEN…you must be born in the United States or in its territories and your parents must BOTH be Citizens.
    President Obama fails on both accounts; his father was definitely not a United States citizen and he wasn’t born in the United States or its territory.
    John McCain failed on one account; he was born just outside the United States territory.in Panama.
    Mitt Romney fails on one account; he was born to parents who were Mexican citizens.
    The race card has been used by the supporters of Barack Obama to crush any discussion regarding his eligibility.  Race baiters in the corrupt, disgraced media who wear their socialist ideology like a badge of honor continue to chant “birthers” are all racists because Obama is black.   They conveniently forget Barry’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham was white.  The correct racial definition is half Caucasian, half Negro.  But, none of that matters to the people who prop up Obama or who proclaim his brilliance.
    The United States Supreme Court refused to grant an oral hearing on Obama’s eligibility case.  An endless stream of lawsuits has followed over the years.  Of course, none of this would have happened had the Outlaw Congress done their job; on January 9, 2009 by stopping the Electoral College vote.  The controversy was raging full steam regarding Obama constitutional eligibility, yet not one member of Congress, not Michelle Bachmann, not Ron Paul, not one single member of Congress had the courage to stand up, invoke house rules and begin a legitimate investigation.
    Now to further hammer nails into the coffin lid of the Constitution comes Mitt Romney.  If there is no repatriation or naturalization of George Romney, Mitt Romney father, and then Mitt is not a natural born citizen.
    The basic premise is simple. Mitt Romney, candidate for President 2012 cannot be eligible for President because his entire family converted to Mexican citizenship and relinquished their United States Citizenship.
    It all began when Miles Romney and Elizabeth Gaskell were converted to Mormonism in England by Mormon missionary Orson Pratt in 1837.  They left England in 1841 for Nauvoo, Illinois to join the Mormons.  They then went to Utah.
    Mitt’s great-grandparents, Melaman Pratt had been ordained by the Latter Day Saints President, John Taylor to become Mexican citizens and help colonize the Mexican Territory of the Colonia Dublan, Chihuahua area of Mexico.  The other great-grandfather of Mitt Romney was Miles Park Romney.  The same priesthood duty was conferred on Miles Romney.  The Romney family Genealogy/History is recorded as the following:
    In 1855, [LDS] President John Taylor advised Brother Romney to go to Mexico, to help establish settlements there.  He was to first take with him only one of his families, the one with the fewest children.  One of his wives, Hannah, stayed in St. Johns, Arizona.  In 1886, Brother Romney sent his eighteen-year-old son, Will, back from Mexico to bring Hannah to the colonies.  She traveled alone with her children in a wagon from St. Johns, Arizona to the colonies of Mexico through Indian Territory.  Miles Romney lived in Mexico as a Mexican citizen for the next two decades and until his death in 1904.  Miles is buried in Colonia Dublan, Chihuahua, Mexico.
    “This is where Gaskell Romney also became a Mexican citizen.  He married his wife in Colonia Dublan. The community was also the birth place of Michigan governor George W. Romney, father of 2012 Presidential candidate Mitt Romney.
    There is no doubt that George W. Romney is NOT a citizen of the United States.   And there are no records showing George Romney’s father ever to have been repatriated.   After fleeing the Mexican revolution, Mitt Romney’s grandfather, Gaskell lost his home and possessions.
    Gaskell and this son, George came back to the United States and renounced their Mexican citizenship.  Once they did this all of their Mexican property and possessions were confiscated.  Gaskell sued Mexico for the loss of his property and in 1938 was awarded damages of $9,163.”
    The big question is this…how did George and Gaskell Romney get their United States citizenship back if they still had it at all?  If Gaskell and Miles Park Romney who were both Mexican citizens how could they transfer United States Citizenship to George Romney?  Mitt Romney, however, may be a birthright baby because he fell under the 14th Amendment, but it is absolutely clear that Mitt Romney is NOT a Natural Born Citizen unless he can prove that George Romney gained citizenship from naturalization prior to Mitt’s birth in 1947.
  2. Both Obama and Romney were members of false churches of God; that is full of rank heresies.  Romney is a member of a church which started when it was said that there were no true Christian churches in the world for 1500 years!  Has American gone insane? Obama spent 20 years in a false church, called Trinity United Church of Christ located in Chicago.  The Church’s pastor was Jeremiah Wright who married, baptized and blessed the home of Obama.
    Mitt Romney is a member of the Mormon Church.  He spent his whole life in this false institution, the fast growing but anti christian church.  He is one of their high priests and a leader of this monstrosity of a church.
    Do you remember when Obama ran in 2008; defeated Hilary; but was not even qualified; was foreign born; had a polygamist father; Communists mother; a Muslim was his second father; and went to a church that was not of God.  He was/is an illegal candidate; hated America; in a church that preaches hatred against America; but the media didn’t respond. There were large and immense crowds that rallied on his behalf; has America lost its mind.
    Now what about Willard “Mitt” Romney; they say that the melancholy of faith is, as long as he performs his duties on the Constitution, it doesn’t matter what is beliefs are.  It doesn’t matter if he is a sadistic polygamist, who is a believer of all kinds of heresies from the pit of hell.  Is that what the God of the Bible says that He will do with such as person?
    Revelation 22:18-19:
    For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book;
    And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the tree of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
    Mitt Romney, his wife and children are all cursed by the God of the Bible.  But this doesn’t matter to the former leader of the Southern Baptist Convention, Richard Land.  Nor does it matter to Joel Osteen, Michelle Bachmann, Sara Palin, and many of the hundreds of others who claim to be “Christian” but have endorsed anti christian Mitt Romney.
    How can that be?  They are both anti christian.  Both Obama and Romney either attended or attend a false, anti christian church.  How can a Christian vote for either one?  The both worship a false god.  They are both children of deception and are leading the nation to the ways of the devil in the pit of hell.  Has America lost their minds?
  3.  People can’t find information on Obama; but in the early days of the Mormon Church Joseph Smith lost the first 116 pages of the Book of Mormon! The Book of Mormon is 530 pages; 779 pages counting the Index.  It was on September 21, 1823 the Moroni, son of Mormon, then a “glorified, resurrected being, appeared to the Prophet Joseph Smith and instructed him relative to the ancient record and its destined translation into the English language”;  Introduction, Book of Mormon. 
    Joseph Smith began his translation of the golden plates that “glorified resurrected being”—but there isn’t any resurrected beings yet outside of our Savior Jesus Christ, showed Joseph Smith where the golden plates had been located for over 1400 years.
    The Prophet’s final statement about the translation procedure, in a November 13, 1843 letter to James Arlington Bennett, adds little more to our understanding of the process:
    “By the power of God I translated the Book of Mormon from hieroglyphics, the knowledge of which was lost to the world in which wonderful event I stood alone, an unlearned youth, to combat the worldly wisdom, and multiplied ignorance of eighteen centuries.”
    To find exactly what the Prophet meant in his repeated insistences that the plates were translated through the medium of Urim and Thummin by the gift and power of God, we must turn to other eye witness accounts.  The Urim and Thummin were never used in translating in the Old Testament.
    Martin Harris served Joseph as the first of several scribes in the work of translation.  His description of the method of translation is specific, though we have it only at second hand.  Edward Stevenson, later of the First Council of Seventy, recorded the testimony of his friend Harris:
    “The Prophet [Joseph Smith] possessed a seer stone, by which he was enabled to translate as well as from the Urim and Thummim, and for convenience he used the seer stone….By aid of the seer stone, sentences would appear and were read by the Prophet and written by Martin, and when finished he would say, “Written,” and if correctly written that sentence would disappear and another appear in its place, but if not written correctly it remained until corrected, so that the translation was just as it was engraven on the plates, precisely in the language then used.”
    Martin served as a scribe only between April 12, 1828 and June 14, 1828, when his part in the loss of the first 116 pages of complete manuscript cost him the privilege of further transcription.  Martin Harris’ wife, who was suspicious about the money that her husband was spending on this new book, asked to see the papers of the newly translated book.  There had been 116 pages translated.
    Joseph Smith refused Martin’s requests three times before he reluctantly let Martin take the entire 116 pages home to his wife.  It was placed in a locked bureau in the home.  When Martin went to get the 116 pages it was gone; never to be seen again.
    Martin went to Joseph and told him what had happened.  Joseph was crushed.  Not only had he lost the first 116 pages of the book of Mormon, but he felt that he couldn’t reproduce it.  There were many names of Kings and battles; he felt the Harris’ wife was waiting with the copy to compare it to see if there were mistakes.
    So, Joseph began translating, but omitted the 116 pages.  He said God gave him a small review of the 116 pages which is now translated in the Book of Mormon.  This would be impossible if Joseph was translating from the golden plates!
    But there are several questions that should be asked:
    1. First, how heavy would this book of over 700 golden pages be?
    2. How does one translate this book when no one knows the language it is written in?
    3. What would that book be worth, just from the gold?
    4. Would God let 116 pages of the Bible be forever discarded?  From Genesis 1 to Exodus 34 would be forever gone if the same amount of pages were dislocated.
According to Joseph Smith, he did not retranslate the material that Harris had lost because he said that if he did, evil men would alter the manuscript in an effort to discredit him.  Smith said that instead, he had been divinely ordered to replace the lost material with Nephi’s account of the same events.  Why?  If he had the golden plates, why didn’t Joseph Smith retranslate the material?
Martin Harris was allowed to become one of the Three Witnesses.  He mortgaged his farm for $4000 as security in the event that the Book of Mormon did not sell and when in fact, it did not, and he lost both his farm and his wife.
In addition, the second scribe to serve Joseph was his wife, Emma,  In 1879 Emma, interviewed by her son Joseph Smith III concerning important events in early Church history, explained,
“In writing for your father I frequently wrote day after day, often sitting at the table close by him, he sitting with his face buried in his hat, with the stone in it, and dictating hour after hour with nothing between us….The plates often lay on the table without any attempt at concealment, wrapped in a small linen table-cloth, which I had given him to fold them in.”
Emma’s service as scribe, interrupted as it must have been by the necessity of household chores, was at best brief.  Her handwriting is not any original manuscript material now available.
Full-time transcription did not become possible again until a young schoolteacher, Oliver Cowdery, arrived April 5, 1829.
Shortly after leaving the Church in 1838, Oliver expanded his description of the translation process:
“I have sometimes had seasons of skepticism, in which I did seriously wonder whether the Prophet and I were men in our sober senses, when he would be translating from plates, through ‘the Urim and Thummin,’ and the plates not be in sight at all.”

Conclusion

America started as a Protestant nation.  With the ratification of its Constitution with the inclusion of Article VI, Clause 3, it began its slow death.  Now we have an election with no Protestant candidate; in fact we have two very anti christian candidates; one who is a member of the daughter of the beast system; none of which our God would in any way approve.
  1. We have both candidates who are not even qualified to be Presidents for they are not NATURAL BORN.  Out of over 340,000,000 people in the country, can’t we find two people who are qualified to be President according to our Constitution?  Who would our GOD choose—a person like Gideon or Elijah!
  2. We have both candidates who attended and who attend false, anti christian churches who put the enemy of Christendom first.  Romney worked for Bain & Company, an Israeli Mossad global spy operation.
  3. We have both candidates who have hidden either their past records or are a member of a Church who has lost 116 pages of the translation of The Book of Mormon.
The translation of the Book of Mormon, which the Mormons say is holier than the Bible, was translated by Joseph Smith from the hieroglyphics that were on the golden plates that were safely hidden for about 1400 years in Cumorah hill.   But how were they translated if no one knows that language?  Seem kind of strange that it would be translated in King James English!
Oliver Cowdery’s writings on how it was translated are very interesting.  Why God would reveal the history of part of his covenant people in golden plates, but would never even use them in the translation?   Why would God choose a prophet would use the tools (seer stone) that He forbids His people from using?  Why would God allow 116 pages of the Book of Mormon to be lost forever?
Part of this generational pilgrimage is due to the church world’s false teaching concerning who Israel is in the world today, and part of it is dispensationalism, that we are somehow no longer “under (Mosaic) Law.”  If the past generation had been diligent in teaching the continuity of Law and Grace, and how our physical as well as spiritual roots are in the Old Testament, I doubt we’d be living in the religious morass we have today.  We wouldn’t be experience the impossible situation we see ourselves.  How insane are we?
  1.  Election 2008; Barak Obama vs. John   McCain—neither candidate a natural born citizen; both candidates an avid enemy of Christianity and a major ally of Christianity’s enemy; both Rothschild’s choice.
  2.  Election 2012; Barak Obama vs. Mitt Romney—neither candidate a natural born citizen; both candidates an avid enemy of Christianity and a major ally of Christianity’s enemy; both Rothschild’s choice.
May our GOD have mercy on His people for we, the children of Israel have sinned against thee, both because we have forsaken our God and also because we are serving Baalim.

Webster Tarpley interviewed by Alex Jones @ OccupyBilderberg 2012

I side with Ron Paul on issues of Domestic policy, Foreign Policy, the Economy, and Immigration.


Ron Paul

I side with Ron Paul on most issues in the 2012 Presidential Election.

Candidates you side with...

79%
Ron Paul
Ron Paul
I side with Ron Paul on issues of Domestic policy, Foreign Policy, the Economy, and Immigration. More info
75%
Gary Johnson
Gary Johnson
I side with Gary Johnson on issues of Domestic policy, Foreign Policy, and the Economy. More info
74%
Jimmy McMillan
Jimmy McMillan
I side with Jimmy McMillan on issues of Domestic policy, the Economy, Science, the Environment, and Immigration. More info
69%
Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney
I side with Mitt Romney on issues of the Economy, Domestic policy, and Immigration. More info
25%
Barack Obama
Barack Obama
I do not side with Barack Obama on any major issues. More info

Facebook friends you side with...

95%
Deborah Barclay
I side the most with Deborah Barclay on issues of Domestic policy, Foreign Policy, Social, the Economy, Healthcare, the Environment, and Immigration. More info
84%
Don Voices
I side the most with Don Voices on issues of Domestic policy, Foreign Policy, Social, Healthcare, and Immigration. More info
84%
Raymond Kegley
I side the most with Raymond Kegley on issues of Foreign Policy, the Economy, Domestic policy, and Science. More info
79%
Miah Akston
I side the most with Miah Akston on issues of Domestic policy, Foreign Policy, and the Environment. More info
72%
Ross Butterfield
I side the most with Ross Butterfield on issues of the Economy, the Environment, and Science. More info
68%
Rick Stevens
I side the most with Rick Stevens on issues of Domestic policy, Foreign Policy, the Economy, and Immigration. More info
54%
Toni Kent
I side the most with Toni Kent on issues of Foreign Policy and Immigration. More info
35%
Chris McCray
I side the most with Chris McCray on issues of Domestic policy and Immigration. More info
29%
Brian Carta
I side the most with Brian Carta on issues of Immigration. More info
28%
Olivier Marino
I side the most with Olivier Marino on issues of Immigration. More info

Who you side with by party...

78% Libertarian
69% Republican
31% Green
25% Democratic

Who you side with by issue...

Most important to me
Foreign Policy
I side the most with Gary Johnson on 91% of foreign policy issues.
Most important to me
Social
I side the most with Fred Karger on 76% of social issues.
Most important to me
Domestic policy
I side the most with Gary Johnson on 94% of domestic policy issues.
More important to me
the Economy
I side the most with Mitt Romney on 98% of economic issues.
More important to me
Healthcare
I side the most with Mitt Romney and Barack Obama on 69% of healthcare issues.
More important to me
the Environment
I side the most with Jimmy McMillan on 84% of environmental issues.
More important to me
Science
I side the most with Jimmy McMillan on 88% of science issues.
Somewhat important to me
Immigration
I side the most with Ron Paul and Mitt Romney on 100% of immigration issues.

Can Ron Paul Be Tamed?

No – but his campaign can

 
You know you’ve hit the big time when the Establishment comes knocking on your door with an offer to sell out. It means you’re drawing blood: that your campaign, or whatever, is having an effect — and not one that pleases the Powers That Be. They want to defang you, if not shut you up, and they’re willing to offer you what Satan offered Jesus up there on that mountain: 

"Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. Then the devil leaveth him, and, behold, angels came and ministered unto him."

If Ron Paul isn’t exactly Jesus, many of his supporters treat him as if he is indeed the incarnation of Liberty in human flesh: the media routinely describes them as "fanatical" – or, more charitably, "devoted" – and I don’t blame them for their enthusiasm (indeed, I share it). Paul is undoubtedly a messianic figure, although he is the last one to give himself that kind of aura, and that’s because we are indeed living in a time of woe, from whence a great many people are seeking deliverance. Ron is their one hope, a bright spot in an ever-darkening and increasingly scary world – and our elites don’t like that one bit.

What they especially don’t like are his foreign policy views, which are routinely described in the lame-stream media as "isolationist" – as if minding our own damned business and not trying to dominate the world would be an isolating act. And of course none of these geniuses ever described, say, Eugene McCarthy, or George McGovern as an "isolationist" – they were "antiwar" candidates because they were on the left, and because no one on the right can ever be against wars of aggression for moral reasons. Yet the 76-year-old country doctor and presidential candidate defies those stereotypes – and, in the process, delegitimizes them as standards of the American political lexicon. He has succeeded in creating a movement that truly transcends the tired old categories of "left" and "right."

This false left-right dichotomy, which does nothing to accurately map the landscape of 21st century American politics, is one of the main weapons in the War Party’s well-stocked arsenal. Because whatever liberals and conservatives disagree about, when it comes time to unleash the dogs of war both the "left" and the "right" have been equal in their bloodthirstiness. To keep up the illusion of conflict, these two wings of the War Party alternate their warmongering schedules: during the Vietnam war era, it was the right that wanted to obliterate the Soviets militarily and the "left" that took up the anti-interventionist banner – although liberal support for the war made the occupation of Vietnam possible, at least initially. In the1930s, their positions were reversed, with conservatives making the case for "isolationism" (i.e. opposition to empire-building): the warmongering was left to the liberals and the extreme left, notably the American Communist Party.

In both cases, the War Party was able to take advantage of the left-right split. In the Thirties, it was the Eastern seaboard Republicans, the Wendell Wilkie group, that absconded with the GOP presidential nomination and sold out the anti-interventionist cause on the campaign trail, never pushing the issue of FDR’s ill-disguised enthusiasm for getting us into the European war. After the election, Wilkie went over to the enemy completely, becoming one of FDR’s biggest supporters, and a tireless advocate of "internationalism," i.e. an American empire on which the sun never sets. His book, One World, is a veritable manifesto of left-sounding globaloney. Behind Wilkie were the big investment banks, the Anglophile elite whose cultural loyalties – and investments in the bonds of European governments – naturally led them into the pro-war camp.

In the 1960s, pro-war Democrats played the key role in getting us into Vietnam and keeping us there long after that disaster had begun to unfold. Back then, we were all chanting "Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?!" That was what antiwar protesters were shouting in the streets as they demanded the withdrawal of US troops from Southeast Asia. Pro-war liberals, known today as neoconservatives, were an ideological bulwark protecting a Democratic administration against a massive and growing antiwar movement – a role that earned them the well-deserved animus of the New Left. The little group around Senator Henry Jackson (D-Boeing) which organized the "Committee for the Free World," provided most of the intellectual firepower behind this rearguard action. After the victory of the McGovernites, they threw up their hands and joined the Republicans: today, we know them as the neoconservatives.

The left-right mindset has another key advantage for the War Party: it keeps anti-interventionists out of the GOP. If the right is inherently warlike, and conservatives have a war gene, then anti-interventionists have no place else to go other than the Democratic party. Which means not only that they must buy into the party’s domestic agenda, but also be reduced to pleading when it comes to, say, reducing the "defense" budget, or refraining from intervening to plant the flag of "democracy" in some godforsaken wilderness. Opponents of our foreign policy of global intervention are entirely dependent on the Democratic leadership to implement their agenda, and keeping these people out of the GOP has been one of the key tasks of the neocons, a job they did with some efficiency until the Ron Paul movement came along.

Paul and his movement are onto the War Party’s games, and they are consciously fighting this left-right illusion — with amazing success. The time is right for it: the nation faces a crisis on a scale not seen since the 1930s. Once again we face the twin specters of an economy in collapse and a world at war. Paul cuts through the ideological fog and in doing so breaks with all the conventions, the worn and now useless political labels that have misled us for so long.

Smearing him hasn’t worked, mockery has just added to his fame, and ignoring him has seriously backfired on the mainstream media, which has made itself more hated by the Republican rank-and-file than it already is — no mean feat. Their last hope is to co-opt him – or, at least, co-opt his movement. And we are seeing the first signs of such an attempt in a front page story in the Washington Post, which posits the existence of a "strategic alliance" between Mitt Romney and Paul. 

Let’s get this out of the way before we get to the really disturbing stuff: there is no such "alliance," strategic or otherwise. Reporter Amy Gardner states categorically that "Mitt Romney and Ron Paul haven’t laid a hand on each other." This is demonstrably and even brazenly untrue. How does Ms. Gardner explain this, and this, and this, and especially this? I could go on, but you see my point.

The piece goes on to note Romney and Paul "became friends in 2008," and "so did their wives." This confuses friendship with cordiality, and, again, proves nothing. Undeterred, Ms. Gardner presses ahead with the punch line:

"The Romney-Paul alliance is more than a curious connection. It is a strategic partnership: for Paul, an opportunity to gain a seat at the table if his long-shot bid for the presidency fails; for Romney, a chance to gain support from one of the most vibrant subgroups within the Republican Party."

So what’s this "strategic partnership" based on? Certainly on nothing Paul has ever said or done – but the people around him are a different matter, and here’s where it gets interesting. After citing various anonymous "senior GOP aides" who advise against alienating either Paul or the Paulians, we are given the following inside information:

"Romney’s aides are ‘quietly in touch with Ron Paul,’ according to a Republican adviser who is in contact with the Romney campaign and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss its internal thinking. The two campaigns have coordinated on minor things, the adviser said — even small details, such as staggering the timing of each candidate’s appearance on television the night of the New Hampshire primary for maximum effect." 

Yes, well, so what? That’s hardly a "strategic partnership": if anything, it’s a tactical convenience that has nothing to do with any policy or real political issues. On this front, Romney has little or nothing to offer Paul, but that doesn’t stop wily old Satan from taking Jesus up to the mountain, and offering him the following:

"’Ron Paul wants a presence at the convention,’ the [GOP] adviser said — and Romney, if he is the nominee, would grant it.

"What Paul and his supporters would demand, and what Romney would offer, are subjects of some speculation. One Paul adviser, speaking on the condition of anonymity to talk freely, said prime-time speaking slots for Paul and his son Rand, the junior senator from Kentucky, are obvious goals. On the policy front, Ron Paul’s priorities are reforming the Federal Reserve and reducing federal spending. So promises to audit the Fed and to tackle deficit reduction seriously could appease the congressman and his supporters, the adviser said.

"Less likely are concessions on foreign policy, where Paul’s non-interventionist stand is at odds with that of Romney and most other Republicans." 

So here is the bargain: give up this non-interventionist foreign policy stuff and we’ll let you speak at the convention, maybe let your son speak – all in exchange for an endorsement of Romney. We may even pay lip service to some of your economic views: maybe we’ll set up a Gold Commission, as was done some years ago under Reagan. Just shut up about foreign policy. 

It isn’t going to happen: unless it’s a wide-open convention, Paul will not be given a speaking slot of any prominence, because he won’t endorse Romney. Period. But there are other ways to influence the candidate, who is after all conducting more of an educational and movement-building campaign within the GOP, as opposed to a conventional candidate-centered campaign. In the Paul camp, the focus is on the message, not the candidate – but there are ways to influence the manner in which that message reaches the general public. 

Ron himself is incorruptible: indeed, he is far more radical on foreign policy than I ever expected him to be. When the subject is economics, he always brings it back to foreign policy, pointing out the indissoluble link between a free and growing economy and a peaceful foreign policy. He is constantly saying that if only we would get rid of the Empire, we could begin to reform our domestic entitlement programs and deal with all the problems we have right here at home.
They can’t influence Ron – but they can influence his organization. Gardner reports that after Ron’s son, Rand, won the Kentucky primary against an Establishment opponent, "Then, quite strangely, the establishment and the Pauls came together":

"At [Sen. Mitch] McConnell’s request, the National Republican Senatorial Committee sent an adviser to Kentucky to watch over Rand Paul’s general-election campaign — ‘to be the grown-up in the room,’ according to one Washington Republican who spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk candidly.

"The adviser, Trygve Olson, developed a friendship with Rand Paul, and the two realized that they could teach each other a lot — to the benefit of both candidate and party. Olson showed Paul and his campaign establishment tactics: working with the news media, fine-tuning its message. And Paul showed Olson — and by extension, McConnell — how many people were drawn to the GOP by his message of fiscal responsibility…. And at Rand Paul’s suggestion, Olson joined his father’s presidential campaign this year, basically to do what he did for Rand: help bring the Paul constituency into the Republican coalition without threatening the party. It’s probably no small coincidence that the partnership helps Rand’s burgeoning political career, too."

Who is Trygve Olson? A former official of the International Republican Institute (IRI), a tax-funded "regime-change" operation under the rubric of the National Endowment for Democracy, Olson was involved in several of the "color revolutions" that swept Eastern Europe and the central Asian former Soviet republics during the Bush years. This New York Times article reports on his activities in Belarus meddling in their internal politics and plotting to overthrow its thuggish President, Alexander Lukashenko: he also played a part in stirring up similar trouble on Washington’s behalf in Serbia and Poland. 

At a meeting of the New Atlantic Initiative, another semi-official interventionist outfit, in 2004, Olson appeared on the same podium as various government apparatchiks of the old Cold Warrior/Radio Free Europe type, who gave seminars on the ins-and-outs of successful "regime change." While others gave talks on Lukashenko’s "links" to Saddam Hussein and Israel’s other enemies in the region, Olson gave a presentation on polling results in the country. A particular area of concern was the possibility of an economic or political union with Russia, which was seen by the participants as the main threat to "democracy" and Europeanization in Belarus. And while meddling in Eastern Europe appears to be his specialty – his wife, Erika Veberyte, served as chief foreign policy advisor to the Speaker of the Lithuanian parliament – this biography on the web site of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University says:

"Mr. Olson has helped advise political parties and candidates in numerous countries throughout the world including nearly all of Central and Eastern Europe, Indonesia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Venezuela, and Serbia."

The "color revolutions" of the Bush era were brazen attempts to overthrow regimes deemed unfriendly to the US, and absorb the scattered pieces of the former Soviet Union into the Western sphere of influence. Of course, these efforts all backfired: in Georgia, for one example, our chosen candidate set up a veritable dictatorship, jailed his opponents for "treason," and launched a disastrous war against Russia. In Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan, too, our sock puppets set themselves up for a backlash: both US-installed regimes have since been ousted, either by being unceremoniously voted out of office or by force. In Venezuela, the US government has long sought to overthrow the blustering caudillo, Hugo Chavez, and our meddling has only played into his hands, enabling him to muster nationalist resentment against the democratic opposition. The same is generally true elsewhere. These "strategic" deployments of "soft power" never work, and wind up hurting our interests rather than advancing them.

Another aspect of these "soft power" deployments is the inevitable involvement of the American intelligence community in some form or other, engaging in covert operations with no real congressional oversight and without the knowledge or consent of the American people. This can lead to all kinds of abuses that inevitably impact on our domestic politics – an area where the CIA is supposedly forbidden from entering, although that has never been the case.

In the New York Times piece on the Belarussian operation, the reporter describes a meeting attended by Olson and Belarussian dissidents as "a meeting of the freedom industry," a telling description because that’s exactly what it is: an industry, one in which Olson is a player. It’s the "regime change" industry that has flourished in this country ever since the start of the cold war. The necons played a key role in staffing the organizations and semi-official front groups into which billions of our tax dollar flowed: Reagan gave the National Endowment for Democracy to them as a sort of playground, where they were out of the way and free to think they had some real influence on the administration. In the post-cold war world, the NED took on added importance – and more tax dollars – as the US tried to cash in on the Soviet collapse by sponsoring "color revolutions" throughout the former Soviet bloc. It didn’t matter that the very reason for launching these cold war institutions was no longer in existence: as one needn’t explain to a Ron Paul supporter, government programs have a life of their own, and killing them is akin to driving a stake through the heart of a vampire – a difficult and often impossible feat.

So we have a major player in the "regime change" industry as a "senior advisor" to the Paul campaign: and not only that but a pedagogical relationship between Olson and Rand Paul. The latter has presumably learned from the former why draconian sanctions on Iran – deemed an "act of war" by his father – are a good idea and ought to be supported. Paul recently joined ninety-nine other similarly clueless US Senators in voting "aye" on what is in effect an economic blockade against Iran. 

The Establishment’s strategy is clear: get to the father through the son, whose political career can be imperiled by the GOP elders, like McConnell (although that didn’t stop Paul from getting elected over McConnel’s opposition). If the Paul campaign is "infiltrating" the GOP, as Gardner puts it, then the GOP Establishment is intent on infiltrating the Paul campaign at the highest levels. 

So if you wondered why the official Paul for President campaign ads devote almost no time to foreign policy issues, then perhaps now you have your answer. Of course, that hasn’t stopped several independent political action committees from making strong anti-interventionist statements on Paul’s behalf: but still, that this end run is even necessary raises all sorts of questions, one of which is surely the exact nature of Olson’s role.

The libertarian movement has been through this sort of thing before. Back in 1980, the Libertarian Party’s presidential candidate, Ed Clark, and his handlers at the Cato Institute, tried to pass off libertarianism as "low tax liberalism." The scheme failed miserably: as Murray Rothbard put it at the time: "They sold their souls for a mess of pottage, and then didn’t even get the pottage!" A similar effort to sell libertarianism as a marginally less belligerent version of conservatism isn’t going to do much better – and certainly Paul himself would have nothing to do with such an effort. As we all know, however, Paul isn’t a hands-on manager: he tends to trust people to carry out his wishes. That hands-off tendency has gotten him in trouble before.

The GOP Establishment fears – and, yes, hates – Ron Paul, and they have good reason to feel that way. It is hardly beyond comprehension that they would attempt to influence – and, ultimately, derail – the campaign and the movement it represents in this covert manner. I don’t think they are stupid enough to believe they can somehow finagle Paul into endorsing Romney, or whoever the GOP candidate might be: what they rightly fear, however, is that the Paul campaign will not end in Tampa – that Paul will launch a third party bid.

That’s what this wheeling and dealing, these shadowy movements in the background, are all about. Whether they will succeed remains to be seen. The signs, however, are not good.  Gardner cites Jesse Benton, Paul’s campaign manager, as saying:

"You can dress in black and stand on the hill and smash the state and influence nobody, or you can realize the dynamics and the environment and get involved in the most pragmatic way to win minds and win votes and influence change. That’s what we’re trying to do."

This is the classic argument for a sell out. The irony is that there is nothing pragmatic about it. The American people stand shoulder to shoulder with Ron when it comes to foreign policy, as every poll has shown. The question is whom do the Paulians want to "influence" – the American people, or the very Establishment they’ve been fighting all these years? The alternative to standing on a hill and making a fashion statement isn’t selling out libertarianism’s anti-imperialist heritage: it’s making that heritage understandable and attractive to the American majority, which is already with us in spirit.
NOTES IN THE MARGIN

The plan, apparently, is to push Rand Paul for the Vice Presidential nomination. These people are deluding themselves – but, then again, that’s how the sell out starts.

Read more by Justin Raimondo

He May Be a Communist