Who Reigns?: Photo proof
Quote by Pope Pius X:
"The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he IS Jesus Christ Himself hidden under a veil of flesh. Does the Pope speak? It is Jesus Christ who speaks. Does the Pope accord a favor or pronounce an anathema? It is Jesus Christ who pronounces the anathema or accords a favor. So that when the Pope speaks we have no business to examine. We only have to obey. We have no right to criticize his decisions, or discuss his commands. Therefore, all who would wear the crown aught to submit to Divine Right." (The Divine Right spoken of here is reference to Jesus Christ himself on earth, the Pope of Rome (the TRUE Antichrist of the Bible). The crown spoken of here refers to all the world's kings, queens, presidents and other heads of state.)
For proof, just go to Google Images and enter the name of any head of state in the world together with the word, Pope.
The Pope reigns over the kings of the earth. They all pay worshipful homage due only to Christ by going to Vatican City (Rev 17:18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.) wearing black and veils (an outward sign of penance and submission) and bow and kiss his ring.
Elections of heads of state are total frauds that are conducted only to deceive the people into believing they have a choice. The Pope picks all the candidates through organizations subservient to the Pope.
Going to the polls only gives the appearance of legitimacy to a complete FRAUD.
Tom Friess
Inquisition Update
"The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he IS Jesus Christ Himself hidden under a veil of flesh. Does the Pope speak? It is Jesus Christ who speaks. Does the Pope accord a favor or pronounce an anathema? It is Jesus Christ who pronounces the anathema or accords a favor. So that when the Pope speaks we have no business to examine. We only have to obey. We have no right to criticize his decisions, or discuss his commands. Therefore, all who would wear the crown aught to submit to Divine Right." (The Divine Right spoken of here is reference to Jesus Christ himself on earth, the Pope of Rome (the TRUE Antichrist of the Bible). The crown spoken of here refers to all the world's kings, queens, presidents and other heads of state.)
Elections of heads of state are total frauds that are conducted only to deceive the people into believing they have a choice. The Pope picks all the candidates through organizations subservient to the Pope.
Going to the polls only gives the appearance of legitimacy to a complete FRAUD.
Tom Friess
Inquisition Update
Ron Paul: Delegates and Freedom
It ain't over. Be not dismayed. The Fight is still on.
"If we didn't receive 20% of the vote in the primary, how can we get any delegates for Ron Paul?"
With the county conventions this Saturday, I want to take a moment to be absolutely clear. The Georgia Primary went exactly as projected and does not affect our strategy or chances of winning delegates for Ron Paul in Georgia at all!
We are all counting on one another to show up this Saturday! If we have the numbers at the Georgia county, district, and state conventions, we can win!
This is How it Works:
At the Georgia State Republican Convention, 31 delegates will be selected to go to the National Republican Convention. A candidate must have at least 20% of the statewide vote in order for any of those delegates to be bound to vote for him at the National Convention... but keep reading. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THESE DELEGATES HAVE TO PERSONALLY SUPPORT THE CANDIDATE TO WHICH THEY ARE BOUND!
The district conventions each select 3 delegates to the National Convention. These delegates will be bound to vote for candidates and generally will be split 2 to 1 depending on who came in first and who came in second in the district. Again, THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THESE DELEGATES HAVE TO PERSONALLY SUPPORT THE CANDIDATE TO WHICH THEY ARE BOUND!
Under Georgia code, our delegates to the national convention are un-bound and FREE TO VOTE THEIR CONSCIENCE:
1. After the second ballot, if no candidate has received 51% of the vote at the National Convention
2. When the candidate to which they are bound fails to receive 35% of the delegate vote from delegates at the National Convention
3. Or when the candidate to whom they are bound releases their delegates (drops out of the race).
When any of the above happens, if our supporters are in those delegate seats, we can deliver Georgia, the 5th largest delegation in the country, to our champion of liberty and defender of the constitution, Ron Paul. This is his strategy and what is happening in states all over the country! All we need to do to make this happen is show up and win delegate seats at our county, district, and state conventions!
To give one example of how we can benefit:
Newt has almost no chance at making it to the National Convention. What will happen to his bound Georgia delegates when he drops out? They will be unbound and can vote for anyone they choose! Who will be in those seats when that happens is up to us at these conventions!
With every primary and caucus this election season going to a different candidate, and with Ron Paul coming in 2nd more than any other candidate, not to mention picking up many secret delegates in various states, it is looking very likely that no candidate will receive 51% of the delegate vote on the first ballot. This will result in a "brokered" or "open" convention. In an open convention all bets are off. Again, who will be sitting in Georgia's delegate seats? That's what these conventions are all about!
I will continue to send updates and strategy information leading up to Saturday, after which your inbox will get a break and my family will get some time to see me again:)
Thank you for all of your hard work and I wish you all the best of luck on Saturday!!!
In Liberty,
"An idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army - or any government!" -- Texas Congressman Ron Paul
IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!
In His Face White House Petition: IMPEACH BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS ADMINISTRATION! https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/impeach-barack-hussein-obama-and-his-administration/CmmG5jPy
Criticize government, get arrested!
Civil liberties organization says Supremes need to create 'deterrent'
The friend-of-the-court filing comes from the Rutherford Institute in the case Virgil D. Reichle Jr. and Dan Doyle vs. Steven Howards.
The Institute said Howards “made a telephone call in which he was heard to say that he was going to ask Cheney ‘how many kids he’s killed today.’ The Secret Service agent who overheard Howards’ conversation alerted other agents on the detail to monitor Howards.”
The man eventually told Cheney his policies in Iraq “are disgusting,” and when Cheney turned to walk away, Howards “lightly touched” Cheney’s shoulder.
Federal agents conferred, questioned Howards and eventually arrested him for “assaulting” Cheney.
Howards sued under the First Amendment, alleging retaliation against him for engaging in unpopular or critical speech.
“This case will affect the right of Americans to petition the government for a redress of grievances – whether that petitioning takes the form of a shouted statement to the president or a sign that is critical of Congress,” said John W. Whitehead, president of the Rutherford Institute.
“If Americans are not able to challenge law enforcement officials over retaliatory arrests under the First Amendment, few, if any, checks will remain to deter government officials from employing intimidating tactics designed to chill the exercise of unpopular or critical political speech.”
Charges against Howards eventually were dropped, and his lawsuit alleged the agents violated his rights under the First Amendment. The agents said because Howards had denied touching the vice president, they had probable cause to arrest him for lying to a federal official.
At the appellate level, in Denver’s 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, justices reinstated Howards’ First Amendment claim, and the question now is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The brief explains that those who criticize the government “have historically faced the wrath of government officials who desire to squelch criticism.”
It continues, “If a remedy for retaliatory arrests in made practically unavailable, government officials will feel emboldened to target their critics and unpopular speech will be chilled. It is crucial that an effective deterrent remain in place to prevent invidious discrimination on the basis of the exercise of freedom of speech.”
“Restrictions on speech run afoul of the First Amendment when they produce a fear of punishment or sanction that inhibits the exercise of protected speech, even if the restrictions would otherwise be permissible,” the brief argues. “A chilling effect on First Amendment rights constitutes injury-in-fact…
“The availability of claims for retaliatory arrest serves to prevent and deter the government from imposing a chilling effect upon the speech of citizens,” it argues. “Recognition of a retaliatory arrest cause of action serves as a deterrent upon law enforcement officials who might use their power to prevent and intimidate persons from criticizing the government.”
At the lower court level, the agents had argued that if there was probable cause for an arrest on any allegation, they should be protected.
That, however, “would add substantially to the plaintiff’s burden and likely would prevent almost any plaintiff from prevailing on a retaliatory arrest claim … The petitions and the United States have argued, and the 10th Circuit understood, that the proposed ‘no probable cause’ element would require the plaintiff to show that, at the time of the arrest, there was no probable cause to arrest the plaintiff not for the crime for which he or she was arrested, but for any crime. Effectively, this would require the plaintiff to prove not just that he or she was innocent of every existing crime at the time of the arrest, but that there was no reason even to believe that he or she committed any crime at all.”
Most important, though, is the discouragement that would be created for interaction between government officials and citizens.
“The First Amendment guarantees citizens the right to petition at the very least the Legislative and Executive branches. … This right has no clearer expression than in petitions made directly and in person to senior officials,” the brief explains. “Chilling this activity strikes at the very core of the American tradition of representative democracy.”
Texas judge attacks marriage
The Radical Homosexual Lobby is attacking real marriage on every front.
Let me warn you, this story goes beyond an outrage.
A Texas judge and radical homosexual activist is refusing to perform any real marriage ceremonies in her court until she gets her way.
That’s right. Judge Tonya Parker said that if she can’t marry a woman, then no one else should marry either.
She is sending away every traditional couple who comes into her court with the order to embrace homosexual “marriage” as sacred.
She is trying to force Texans to accept homosexual “marriage” using the authority of the bench.
All this despite having been elected to a public position in a state which does not allow homosexual “marriage.”
It is particularly horrifying for judge to so openly defy the law of the land.
This is a clear dereliction of her responsibilities and an insult to pro-Family Americans and the very institution of marriage.
And what’s worse, it’s a perversion of her role as a keeper of the law.
Every judge is charged with upholding the laws passed by the legislators and the voters. But Judge Parker is trying to subvert the laws and force homosexual “marriage” into Texas just because she wants it.
Marriage truly is being attacked from all sides.
With two more states added to the homosexual “marriage” cabal -- they almost got a third state -- and with California’s Proposition 8 being attacked by judges...
...my friend, it looks dark.
They will do just about anything to take this decision out of the hands of the American people.
The radical homosexuals know that they cannot pass their perverted agenda by vote, so they resort to activist courts and aggressive legislators.
And I hate to say it, but Public Advocate is the only group in America who is challenging them on every issue; who is fighting to defend the Family every time its attacked.
It is up to you and me.
We have to show the minions of the Homosexual Lobby, like Judge Parker, that we will not bow down to their agenda.
For the Family,
Eugene Delgaudio
President, Public Advocate of the United States
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)