ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

5 Proposals to Combat ‘Global Warming’ That Should Make Us All Cringe

Amplify’d from theintelhub.com

5 Proposals to Combat ‘Global Warming’ That Should Make Us All Cringe

Dees Illustration

Eric Blair

Activist Post

February 28th, 2011

There has not been much middle ground found between global warming believers and the “it’s a hoax” crowd. I started as a believer after watching An Inconvenient Truth. I struggled to even look into the alternative view because the establishment had so successfully made the deniers seem insane.

However, having now done extensive research, I can attest that the “hoax” crowd has just as much, if not more, compelling evidence on their side as believers do. Furthermore, most global warming deniers won’t disagree that the climate is changing or shifting in some noticeable way, only that man-made CO2 is not the primary cause.

This article is not intended to debate the questions surrounding the man-made global warming theory, but rather the proposed “solutions.” Most believers genuinely care about the environment and view deniers as selfish “takers” who care not for mother nature. This is not the case at all.  In fact, I would argue that most deniers feel just as passionately about environmental issues as believers.  The difference seems to be that deniers focus their energy on tangible and measurable problems in the environment like water, air and soil pollution, GMO food, excessive pharmaceuticals, chemical spraying, and results from oil spills and gas fracking to name a few.

None of these very real threats to human and environmental health are addressed by the global warming crowd, save for possibly air pollution.  When one dissects the proposals to combat global warming, it seems clear that the environmental movement has been hijacked by CO2 propagandists for an ulterior motive.  Even though hardcore believers seem to have a healthy distrust for bankers, corporations, and their puppet politicians, they have a very difficult time challenging the establishment’s science or solutions pertaining to global warming.  They seem too busy defending the theory to make the connection to what they’re actually supporting — which is a cabal of big banks, big oil, and big brother seeking further control of society by hyping unprovable environmental threats that they never actually intend to fix in the first place.

At the very least, eyebrows should be raised since “hacked” emails exposed that the science data had been manipulated to fit the theory.  Alarm bells should go off when we learn that, as Vice President, Gore designed the proposed Cap and Trade system with Enron’s criminal CEO Ken “Kenny Boy” Lay years before the global warming theory had been introduced to the public. And for progressives, a full blown revolt should take place knowing that the scandalous international Banksters and Big Oil have shaped Cap and Trade to line their pockets. Finally, as with any modern legislative proposal, it is designed as a Robin-Hood-in reverse scheme where provisions appear to tax personal human choices, while major corporate polluters are exempt.

Regardless of what we believe about the man-made global warming theory, it certainly appears that the establishment’s fix fits their problem-reaction-solution model of social engineering where many proposed solutions distort humanity’s moral compass.  Below are 5 proposals to combat global warming that should make all environmentalists and humanitarians cringe with embarrassment for supporting them:

1. Taxes to International Bankers: Does anyone still trust the international bankers after their wholesale looting of the general public?  Do genuine environmentalists actually believe it’s a good thing to have this criminal institution in charge of collecting and regulating carbon taxes. The thought of being forced to give more power and more money to the banks seems utterly foolish to support, no matter what environmental catastrophes we may face.  The carbon market is almost entirely voluntary and is still in its infancy, yet there is already major financial fraud occurring which is par for the course for the banksters.  We should be ashamed to promote them as any part of a solution.

2. One-Child Policies: After vilifying China’s one-child policy since its inception, the Western world is now warming to the idea to combat CO2.  In fact, Canada joined China in publicly calling for a Worldwide One-Child Policy during Copenhagen climate talks in 2009.  Forcing this type of law on a previously free society will surely result in forced abortions and other horrific consequences.  It is the epitome of tyranny for the State to take away such basic rights to life.  It seems that the numerous heavyweights pushing this agenda are hell-bent on population reduction in spite of the global warming theory.  If forcing your friends and neighbors into a one-child policy makes sense to you, you may have already lost your humanity to a theoretical fear.

3. Geoengineering: The AP reported during the 2010 Cancun climate talks that “we may need geoengineering as a ‘Plan B,’ if nations fail to forge agreement on a binding treaty to rein in greenhouse gases.” Geoengineering (sometimes referred to as chemtrailing), is high-altitude chemical spraying.  They are the unnatural crisscrossed long white trails left by planes that take days to dissipate. Their patents are high in nanoparticle aluminum and barium, both of which have been found in dangerously high concentrations in otherwise pristine locations.  For decades this program was top secret, and environmental activists were called conspiracy theorists for questioning it.  Now, it is being promoted as the savior to global warming, claiming the extremely poisonous chemicals reflect sunlight away from earth. To learn more about what you would be advocating for as ‘Plan B’ to stop global warming, please watch the very reputable new film What in the World are They Spraying?

4. Rationing: At the COP16 climate meeting in Cancun during record cold temperatures this winter “Some climate change experts say World War II-style rationing in developed countries may be needed to bring down carbon emissions to fight against global warming.”  We all know who is most affected by rationing:  the average little citizen.  I’m reminded of the character Winston Smith in 1984 getting his allotments of fabricated coffee and fuel-like alcohol while the controllers lived in the lap of luxury.  Perhaps, if we’re lucky, the State will take control of local farm harvests for rationed distribution circa the Soviet Union. Ahh, freedom is on the march with this proposal.

5. Nuclear War: Last, but certainly not least, the idea has been floated that a small nuclear war may save us from the global warming bogeyman.  Yes, for the good of humanity and the environment, let’s blow a couple of million people to smithereens and radiate thousands of square miles to force the cooling of the earth.  This is not some fringe group proposing this, but instead NASA, the National Geographic and Ted Turner-owned Time magazines floating the idea.  They say, “Models suggest that though the world is currently in a warming trend, small-scale war could lower global temperatures 2.25 degrees F for two-to-three years following war.”  It seems this scenario will do nothing to reduce CO2, but simply block and absorb heat from the sun.  In fact, they admit it may add carbon into the atmosphere.  If you can’t tell how wrong this concept is on multiple levels then perhaps it’s more appropriate to refer to you as a world-is-flat Neanderthal.

Despite differences in theories, can’t we all agree that these proposals seem downright tyrannical, if not evil?  They all seem to further crush the poorest among us, while eliminating basic individual rights, to openly promoting reducing the human population. And that means you too by the way.  Believers won’t be exempt from the darkest wrath of these proposals.

And worst of all, none of these proposals will do anything to solve authentic environmental degradation, or even CO2 concentrations for that matter.  So, it’s all right to believe any theory you wish, but just be more informed and honest when defending the establishment’s proposed solutions. They are not designed or intended to protect you or the environment from global warming.

Read more at theintelhub.com
 
See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/bs9pg

on No comments:

Real ID Mandatory State Compliance by May 11, 2011?

Amplify’d from theintelhub.com

Real ID Mandatory State Compliance by May 11, 2011?

The Intel Hub Radio

By Avalon

February 28, 2011

In what could only be described as a Masterpiece in Incrementalism, the long awaited Real ID System is now mandating that states be in compliance by May 11, 2011.

The REAL ID Act of 2005 requires state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards to meet federal standards by a certain date in order to be accepted for federal purposes. What is that date?  All 56 U.S. jurisdictions received an initial extension through Dec. 31, 2009, from the secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).


In December 2009, the secretary issued a statement to waive that deadline.  States must now be in full-compliance by May 11, 2011. What is the penalty for non-compliance?  Residents in non-compliant states will not be able to use their driver’s license to board commercial aircraft, gain access to federal facilities or enter nuclear power plants.– National Conference of State Legislatures

Of particular interest are the latest entries on the NCSL website, which are detailed below.


  • Today: Where We Stand

On May 11, 2008, state driver’s licenses and identification cards were not be accepted for federal purposes unless the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determined that a state was compliant with the Real ID or a state had been granted  an extension by DHS. As of April 2008, all 56 U.S. jurisdictions had received an initial extension from the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The initial extension is valid until Dec. 31, 2009.

States have the option of filing by for a second extension to May 10, 2011, if the state can demonstrate it is in material compliance with 18 interim benchmarks.

That request must be made by Dec. 1, 2009. If an extension is not received, individuals in those states will not be able to use state-issued driver’s licenses or identification cards to board commercial aircrafts or enter certain federal facilities and nuclear power plants.

To date, Congress has appropriated only $200 million to assist states with implementation of the Real ID.

Read Entire Article

Read more at theintelhub.com
 
See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/bs9ov

on No comments:

Boehner rips bid to regulate Internet

Amplify’d from www.infowars.com


Boehner rips bid to regulate Internet

Read more at www.infowars.com
Amplify’d from www.washingtontimes.com

Mark A. Kellner

Washington Times

February 28, 2011

NASHVILLE, Tenn. | House Speaker John A. Boehner lashed out against efforts to regulate Internet traffic before an audience of evangelical Christian media leaders and pointedly responded to President Obama by comparing the challenge of the burgeoning national debt to the Sputnik-era space race.

In a speech to religious broadcasters that received a sustained ovation at his conclusion, he said free expression is under attack by a power structure in Washington populated with regulators who have never set foot inside a radio station or a television studio.

“We see this threat in how the FCC is creeping further into the free market by trying to regulate the Internet,” Mr. Boehner said.

Read full article

Read more at www.washingtontimes.com
 
See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/brz5s

on No comments:

America's shocking secret: Pictures show how U.S. experimented on its own disabled citizens and prison inmates

Amplify’d from www.dailymail.co.uk

America's shocking secret: Pictures that show how U.S. experimented on its own disabled citizens and prison inmates

By
Daily Mail Reporter
Pictures have emerged providing the shocking proof that U.S. government doctors once experimented on disabled American citizens and prison inmates.

Such experiments included giving hepatitis to mental patients in Connecticut, squirting a pandemic flu virus up the noses of prisoners in Maryland, and injecting cancer cells into chronically ill people at a New York hospital.

Much of this horrific history is 40 to 80 years old, but it is the backdrop for a meeting in Washington this week by a presidential bioethics commission.

Experiments

Prison 'volunteers': In this 1966 picture, medical administrator Solomon McBride questions a clearly marked subject at Holmesburg Prison, Philadelphia. Questions have been rasied about whether inmates were coerced

The meeting was triggered by the government's apology last year for federal doctors infecting prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis 65 years ago.

U.S. officials also acknowledged there had been dozens of similar experiments in America - studies that often involved making healthy people sick.

A review by the Associated Press of medical journal reports and decades-old press clippings found more than 40 such studies.

At best, these were a search for lifesaving treatments - at worst, some amounted to curiosity-satisfying experiments that hurt people but provided no useful results.
Experiment

Captive guinea pigs: In 1945, army doctors exposed inmates to malaria-carrying mosquitoes in the malaria ward at Stateville Penitentiary in Crest Hill, Illinois. Prisoners were enlisted to help the war effort

It echoes the deadly and meritless experiments conducted on Jewish concentration camp detainees at the hands of Nazi doctors.

And it will undoubtedly be compared to the Tuskegee syphilis study, where U.S. health officials tracked 600 black men in Alabama who already had syphilis - but didn't give them adequate treatment even after penicillin became available.

Arthur Caplan, director of the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Bioethics, said: 'When you give somebody a disease - even by the standards of their time - you really cross the key ethical norm of the profession.'

Most of the recently revealed studies, from the 1940s to the 1960s, apparently were never covered by news media. Others were reported at the time but the focus was on the promise of enduring new cures, while glossing over how test subjects were treated.

Experiment

Infect and observe: An army doctor watches as malaria-carrying mosquitoes bite the stomach of inmate Richard Knickerbockers, serving 10 to 14 years, in Stateville in 1945

Many prominent researchers felt it was legitimate to experiment on people who did not have full rights in society - people like prisoners, mental patients or the poor blacks.

Laura Stark, a Wesleyan University assistant professor of science in
society - who is writing a book about past federal medical experiments - said: 'There was definitely a sense - that we don't have today - that sacrifice for the nation was important.'

Though people in the studies were usually described as volunteers, historians and ethicists have questioned how well these people understood what was to be done to them and why, or whether they were coerced.

Prisoners have long been victimised for the sake of science. In 1915, the U.S. government's Dr Joseph Goldberger - today remembered as a public health hero - recruited Mississippi inmates to go on special rations to prove his theory that the painful illness pellagra was caused by a dietary deficiency (The men were offered pardons for their participation).

Experiments
Holmesburg Prison

Survivor: Edward Anthony was experimented on while he was an inmate at Philadelphia's Holmesburg Prison. Shocking as it is today, doctors at the time did not find the experiments unethical

But studies using prisoners were uncommon in the first few decades of the 20th century, and were usually performed by researchers considered eccentric even by the standards of the day.

One was Dr LL Stanley, resident physician at San Quentin prison in California, who around 1920 attempted to treat older, 'devitalized men' by implanting in them testicles from livestock and from recently executed convicts.

Newspapers wrote about Stanley's experiments, but the lack of outrage is striking.

One long-winded but otherwise cheery 1919 report in the Washington Post began: 'Enter San Quentin penitentiary in the role of the Fountain of Youth - an institution where the years are made to roll back for men of failing mentality and vitality and where the spring is restored to the step, wit to the brain, vigor to the muscles and ambition to the spirit. All this has been done, is being done... by a surgeon with a scalpel.'

SHOCKING CATALOGUE OF MEDICAL STUDIES BY AMERICA... ON AMERICA

The AP review of past research found:

1) A federally funded study begun in 1942 injected experimental flu
vaccine in male patients at a state insane asylum in Ypsilanti,
Michigan, then exposed them to flu several months later.

It was
co-authored by Dr Jonas Salk, who a decade later would become famous as
inventor of the polio vaccine.
Some of the men weren't able to describe their symptoms, raising serious
questions about how well they understood what was being done to them.

2) In federally funded studies in the 1940s, noted researcher Dr W Paul
Havens Jnr exposed men to hepatitis in a series of experiments,
including one using patients from mental institutions in Middletown and
Norwich, Connecticut.

Dr Havens, a World Health Organization expert on viral diseases, was one
of the first scientists to differentiate types of hepatitis and their
causes.

3) Researchers in the mid-1940s studied the transmission of a deadly
stomach bug by having young men swallow unfiltered faecal matter.
The study was conducted at the New York State Vocational Institution, a
reformatory prison in West Coxsackie.
The point was to see how well the disease spread through ingestion. The
study doesn't explain if the men were rewarded for this awful task.

4) A University of Minnesota study in the late 1940s injected 11 public
service employee volunteers with malaria, then starved them for five
days. Some were also subjected to hard labour. Then they were treated
for malarial fevers with quinine sulfate.

One of the authors was Ancel Keys, a noted dietary scientist who
developed K-rations for the military and the Mediterranean diet for the
public.

5) For a study in 1957, when the Asian flu pandemic was spreading,
federal researchers sprayed the virus in the noses of 23 inmates at
Patuxent prison in Jessup, Md., to compare their reactions to those of
32 virus-exposed inmates who had been given a new vaccine.

6) Government researchers in the 1950s tried to infect about two dozen
volunteering prison inmates with gonorrhoea using two different methods
in an experiment at a federal prison in Atlanta. But the researchers
noted their methods weren't comparable to how men normally got infected -
by having sex with an infected partner. Too late for the men they had
already infected. 

Around the time of World War II, prisoners were enlisted to help the war effort by taking part in studies that could help the troops. One was a series of malaria studies at Stateville Penitentiary in Illinois was designed to test antimalarial drugs that could help soldiers fighting in the Pacific.
It was at about this time that prosecution of Nazi doctors in 1947 led to the Nuremberg Code, a set of international rules to protect human test subjects. Many U.S. doctors essentially ignored them, arguing that they applied to Nazi atrocities - not to American medicine.
The late 1940s and 1950s saw huge growth in the U.S. pharmaceutical and health care industries, accompanied by a boom in prisoner experiments funded by both the government and corporations.
By the 1960s, at least half the states allowed prisoners to be used as medical guinea pigs.
But two studies in the 1960s proved to be turning points in the public's attitude toward the way test subjects were treated.
The first came to light in 1963. Researchers injected cancer cells into 19 old and debilitated patients at a Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital in the New York borough of Brooklyn - to see if their bodies would reject them.
The hospital director said the patients were not told they were being injected with cancer cells because there was no need - the cells were deemed harmless.
But the experiment upset a lawyer named William Hyman, who sat on the hospital's board of directors.
The state investigated, and the hospital ultimately said any such experiments would require the patient's written consent.
At nearby Staten Island, from 1963 to 1966, a controversial medical study was conducted at the Willowbrook State School for children with mental retardation.

The children were intentionally given hepatitis orally and by injection to see if they could then be cured with gamma globulin.

Those two studies - along with the Tuskegee experiment revealed in 1972 - proved to be a 'unholy trinity' that sparked extensive and critical media coverage and public disgust, said Susan Reverby, the Wellesley College historian who first discovered records of the syphilis study in Guatemala.
By the early 1970s, even experiments involving prisoners were considered scandalous. In widely covered congressional hearings in 1973, pharmaceutical industry officials acknowledged they were using prisoners for testing because they were cheaper than chimpanzees.

Holmesburg Prison in Philadelphia made extensive use of inmates for medical experiments. Some of the victims are still around to talk about it.

Edward Anthony, featured in a book about the studies, says he agreed to have a layer of skin peeled off his back, which was coated with searing chemicals to test a drug. He did that for money to buy cigarettes in prison.

He spoke of his reaction to the experiment, saying: 'I said "Oh my God, my back is on fire! Take this ... off me".'

Mr Anthony recalled the beginning of weeks of intense itching and agonising pain.

The government responded with reforms. Among them: The U.S. Bureau of Prisons in the mid-1970s effectively excluded all research by drug companies and other outside agencies within federal prisons.

Nazis

Criminal experiments: Experiments by Dr Josef Mengele (second left) and others like him were internationally condemned as war crimes for their lack of merit

As the supply of prisoners and mental patients dried up, researchers looked to other countries.
It made sense. Clinical trials could be done more cheaply and with fewer rules. And it was easy to find patients who were taking no medication, a factor that can complicate tests of other drugs.

Additional sets of ethical guidelines have been enacted, and few believe that another Guatemala study could happen today.

Despite modern-day outrage, it has not stopped Tuskegee-style experiments continuing.
American-funded doctors in Uganda failed to give the Aids drug AZT to HIV-infected pregnant women, even though it would have protected their newborns.

U.S. health officials argued the study would answer questions about AZT's use in the developing world.

The other study, by Pfizer, gave an antibiotic named Trovan to children with meningitis in Nigeria, although there were doubts about its effectiveness for that disease.

Critics blamed the experiment for the deaths of 11 children and the disabling of scores of others.

Pfizer settled a lawsuit with Nigerian officials for $75 million but admitted no wrongdoing.

The issue of American-led foreign studies was still being debated when, last October, the Guatemala study came to light.

In the 1946-48 study, American scientists infected prisoners and patients in a mental hospital in Guatemala with syphilis, apparently to test whether penicillin could prevent some sexually transmitted disease. The study came up with no useful information and was hidden for decades.

  • £160 on your family holiday: Travel giants impose fuel surcharges on sunshine breaks





  • Car insurance for women to soar by up to 25% and men face a 10% CUT after EU rules firms can't sell single-sex policies





  • 'You've got 10 seconds to say goodbye to your kids': What father accused of killing daughter by driving into river 'told' his estranged wife





  • Relatives weep as they hear how Cumbria massacre gunman Derrick Bird shot his own brother 11 times and blasted strangers during rampage





  • Libyan rebels celebrate victory after fending off six-sided attack on closest city to Tripoli





  • U.S. ambassador to UN warns of 'humanitarian disaster' as 140,000 refugees mass at Libya's borders





  • 11,000 servicemen and women axed as Government plans Libya no-fly zone





  • Pictured on their yachting holiday, family of five Somali pirates are now threatening to kill





  • Sailor who launched foul-mouthed rants at TV's Question Time is jailed for upsetting neighbours





  • Criminals should be sentenced 'according to how MATURE they are'





  • Four in ten children could miss out on their first-choice secondary school place





  • Knighted head arrested in alleged '£1.6m fraud'





  • Binge-drinking is in the genes: Scientists isolate brain chemical that makes us crave alcohol





  • First 'reliable' test for prostate cancer: urine screening detects 50% more cases





  • One in 10 adults are permanently overdrawn (and a third have been in the red in the last year)





  • Girl, 3, died from swine flu at short-staffed hospital days after baby was sent home with the virus





  • Three-quarters of children aged five used the internet EVERY DAY





  • Fresh earthquake strikes New Zealand





  • VW takes us back to the Summer of Love: iconic car gets a very modern makeover





  • Scientists 'make diesel fuel using sun, water and carbon dioxide'





  • Total wipeout: Sickening moment motorist ploughed through 40 cyclists





  • Taxpayers to pay for £33.5m Government study of children's life chances... as its CUTS child benefits and school funding





  • Disabled woman 'torched ex-boyfriend's flat killing mother and toddler who lived in flat above'





  • Death of mother, 21, killed in crash marks double tragedy for parents who lost son five years earlier





  • Lesbian Army officer sent home from Afghanistan 'because commander objected to her sexuality'





  • Trapped in time: Chateau left in the dark for a century on the wishes of obsessive owner



  • MORE HEADLINES
    • Read more at www.dailymail.co.uk
     
    See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/bs9o5

    on No comments:

    Alex Jones Culture Jams The View

    Amplify’d from www.infowars.com


    Alex Jones Culture Jams The View

    You Tube

    February 28, 2011

    Alex Jones blasts the truth to The View’s audience of 30 Million.

    UPDATE: Alex Jones’ Appearance on The View linked at top of Drudge…

    Alex Jones' appearance on The View, Drudge Report
    See more at www.infowars.com
     
    See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/bs9ni

    on No comments:

    Convicted female sex offender wanted for failing to register address

    Amplify’d from www.inyork.com

    Convicted female sex offender wanted for failing to register address

    Daily Record/Sunday News
    (Submitted)
    York, PA -
    The York County Sheriff's Office is looking for a convicted sex offender who failed to report a change of address, according to a news release.


    An arrest warrant for Judy L. Gingrich, 52, was filed with District Judge Linda L. Williams' office on Jan. 4, according to Lt. David Godfrey of the York County Sheriff's Office.


    Gingrich, who also goes by the name Judy Saylor, is 5 feet 8 inches tall, weighs 160 pounds, and has green eyes and brown-and-gray hair.


    She is also wanted on a state probation-parole warrant, Godfrey said.


    According to court records, Gingrich pleaded no contest to charges including involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, corruption of minors and criminal solicitation in 1989 in Lebanon County.


    Gingrich has also been added to the York County Sheriff's Department's Most Wanted list.


    To search addresses for sex offenders required to register, go to familywatchdog.us or PA Megan's Law website.





    Read more at www.inyork.com
     
    See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/bs9na

    on No comments:

    Polygamy outlawed - so why not sharia?

    Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
    Polygamy outlawed - so why not sharia?
    Chad Groening - OneNewsNow

    terrorist prisonerA bestselling author and critic of Islam argues that it will take a sea change in American policy for the United States to stop blindly issuing student visas to Muslims, despite the fact some come to the U.S. to commit terrorist acts.

    Recently a 20-year-old Saudi Arabian national was arrested by the FBI in Texas, suspected of planning a terrorist attack using explosive chemicals. His possible targets included the Dallas home of former President George W. Bush. Authorities say the Islamic suspect indicated in his diary that he had been plotting an attack for years and obtained a scholarship so he could come directly to the United States to carry out jihad.

     

    Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch says in a sane society, the alleged "student" would never have been allowed into the country -- but Spencer admits he does not see any sanity on the horizon.

     
    Robert Spencer"People say...'You can't restrict their freedom of religion' -- [and] meanwhile they're working to restrict our freedom of religion, working to restrict our freedom of speech and freedom of conscience and so on," he points out. "But that's okay because [they argue] we can't restrict their freedom of religion."

     

    That argument is "ridiculous," says Spencer. "In the first place, America has moved to restrict the freedom of religion of various groups in the past, notably by outlawing Mormon polygamy in the late 19th Century...and forcing the Mormons to accept that or not to be considered to be a legal group in the United States."

     

    Consequently, the Jihad Watch leader says he does not know why it is not possible to say that a religion that espouses sharia law is also seditious and not acceptable in the United States.

    Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
     
    See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/bs9n9

    on No comments:

    Activist: Like Jerry Brown, Obama 'lied' about defending marriage

    Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
    Activist: Like Jerry Brown, Obama 'lied' about defending marriage
    Becky Yeh - OneNewsNow California correspondent

    A prominent pro-family activist in California is accusing Barack Obama of lying to the American people when he stated that he would defend traditional marriage.

    President Obama's announcement last week that he will no longer protect the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) sparked outrage among marriage proponents who say the president ignored the will of the people and stepped over his boundaries. Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, points out the president's action is clearly an attack against the values of Americans and a mark of an "increasingly totalitarian government."

     
    Randy Thomasson"It's downright frightening to hear U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder suggest that moral disapproval of homosexual marriages is somehow unconstitutional," he laments. "What's next? Federal lawsuits against states with man-woman marriage laws -- and federal investigations of individuals who believe that marriage is only for a man and a woman?"

     

    Thomasson urges the U.S. House of Representatives to take action and intervene to save DOMA. He equates Obama's action to that of California Governor (and former Attorney General) Jerry Brown, who decided not to defend marriage when his role as the state's chief law enforcement officer was to support state law.

     

    "Barack Obama lied when he said he'd defend marriage for only a man and a woman," laments Thomasson. "And now Obama is following in the footsteps of another liar -- that's Jerry Brown of California."

     

    The SaveCalifornia.com president points out officials in Washington are not abiding by federal law and are instead choosing to implement their personal feelings in the decision.

     
    Prop. 8 remains in limbo
    Thomasson has been on the front lines in The Golden State's seemingly unending legal clash over Proposition 8, the 2008 voter-approved measure that defines marriage between a man and a woman. Attorneys in that battle have requested that the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lift the ban on homosexual "marriages" while the California Supreme Court decides the issue. The petition came after the state's highest court announced its decision to hear the case on marriage, delaying the case until the end of the year.

     
    California marriage issue bigThomasson tells OneNewsNow that the move is a process of appeal. "I'm hoping that this in-your-face, selfish move by [attorneys] Ted Olson and David Boies will be rejected by the federal appeals court as simply too much and out of order," the family advocate offers. (Listen to audio report)

     

    The Ninth Circuit requested the state's highest court to decide whether state law permits initiative proponents to defend their measures in court.

     

    Thomasson suggests it is time for America to seek God and turn in repentance. "We need to pray for justice to be done; [we need to] pray for protection from God because America is going down the toilet morally because of its disobedience to God; and we need to ask for God's mercy -- something we certainly don't deserve."

     

    The decision by the California Supreme Court is pivotal to supporters of Prop. 8 who may see the law overturned if the court decides proponents do not have a right to defend their measures in court.
    Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
     
    See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/bs9n8

    on No comments:

    More Planned Parenthood secrets surfaced

    Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
    More Planned Parenthood secrets surfaced
    Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow

    Kansas 2Recently released information concerning Planned Parenthood strengthens former Attorney General Phill Kline's case in the ethics trial that is currently under way in Kansas. (See earlier story)

    Kline's law license is at risk for his investigations into the Kansas City Planned Parenthood. But recently revealed records show that even though the abortion facility performed abortions on 249 girls age 15 and under, only four cases were reported to authorities.


    Considering the fact that state law requires that all cases be reported, including those of sexual abuse, Operation Rescue president Troy Newman tells OneNewsNow the practices carried out by Planned Parenthood over the past decade are now more evident.

    Troy Newman"The abortion industry is really nothing more than a shill for the pedophile protection racket that's going on in the United States," Newman argues. "In other words, they're covering up for the pedophiles who bring these little girls into the abortion clinics to cover up their crimes."


    So even though Kline stepped up to battle Planned Parenthood, Newman laments that the system has chosen to persecute him.


    "If we can get him exonerated, put enough public pressure on the Kansas Supreme Court, then the rest of the prosecutors around the country will feel safe in their position to go ahead and prosecute the laws as they're already written and on the books," the pro-life activist contends.



    In the meantime, says the pro-life leader, the young girls will continue to get secret abortions before they are sent back for further abuse -- a practice that investigations from Life Dynamics and Lila Rose's Live Action have shown is widespread among Planned Parenthood clinics across the U.S.

    Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
     
    See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/bs9n3

    on No comments:
    Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)