ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

9/11 Masterminds – Explosive Connections

Amplify’d from theintelhub.com

9/11 Masterminds – Explosive Connections

For blueprints of the WTCs with a list of all the suspicious tenants and connections check out:

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-10/explosive-connections-initial-draft-rel

Links and sources for things mentioned in the video:

Kevin R. Ryan, et al, Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials, The Environmentalist, Volume 29, Number 1 / March, 2009, http://www.springerlink.com/content/f67q6272583h86n4/

Niels H. Harrit, et al, Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, Vol 2, 2009, doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007, http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7T

Kevin R. Ryan, The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nanothermites, Journal of 9/11 Studies, July 2008, http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf

Wikipedia page for Jerome Hauer, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerome_Hauer

Peter Jennings interview with Jerome Hauer, ABC, on 9/11, 14:53, available on You Tube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj0Rz9ZsDAg

Taku Murakami, US Patent 5532449 – Using plasma ARC and thermite to demolish concrete, http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/5532449/description.html

Steven E. Jones et al, Extremely High Temperatures During the World Trade Center Destruction, Journal of 9/11 Studies, January 2008 http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf

Albert Gibson et al, Integral low-energy thermite igniter, US Patent number: 4464989, http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=rKl1AAAAEBAJ&dq=US+4464989

Skull and Bones is a secret society at Yale University, founded in 1832. Members have included George H.W. Bush, his father Prescott Bush, his son George W. Bush, his brother Jonathan J. Bush, and many other powerful people. For LMI’s mission, see its website – http://www.lmi.org/aboutus/aboutus.aspx

Michael C. Ruppert, Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA’s Highest Ranks, October 9, 2001, http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html

Kevin R. Ryan, Mahmud Ahmed’s itinerary from his Washington DC visit the week of 9/11, 911blogger.com, 11/27/2009, http://www.911blogger.com/node/21978

The agreement between LLNL and Savannah River can be found here – https://www.llnl.gov/str/News597.html

Savannah’s reference to developing sol-gels can be found here – http://srnl.doe.gov/mat_sci.htm

SEC document for Washington pre-payments – http://www.secinfo.com/dRqWm.4G1Vx.c.htm

The Ties That Bind, Descended from family business empires, six huge business groups dominate the Japanese economy, Multinational Monitor, October 1983 – http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/issues/1983/10/ties.html

Securacomm Consulting Inc. v. Securacom Incorporated, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, January 20, 1999, 49 U.S.P.Q.2d 1444; 166 F.3d 182, http://altlaw.org/v1/cases/1099498

Wikipedia page for Stratesec, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratesec

SEC filing for Stratesec, May 2, 1997, http://www.secinfo.com/dS7kv.82.htm

Kroll Inc website, http://www.kroll.com/about/

Wikipedia page for the Quill and Dagger Society, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quill_and_Dagger

The History Commons, “Wolfowitz Doctrine”, http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=us_international_relations_41 Aaron Dykes, Wolfowitz Warns of ‘Surprise like Pearl Harbor’ Months Before 9/11 Attacks, Jones Report, February 9, 2007 http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/070207_wolfowitz.html Wolfowitz’s meeting with Mahmud Ahmed was documented in a FOIA response obtained by the 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington – http://911workinggroup.org/

Plaintiffs” Opposition to Defendant Terrence R. McAuliffe’s Motion to Dismiss, Case No: 1:98CV02859 (RCL), W.L. Meng et al vs. Bernard L. Schwartz and Loral Space et al, US District Court for the District of Columbia, http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/ois/cases/chinagate-loral/loral12500d.htm

Read more at theintelhub.com
 

Kansas City Bishop Indicted in Reporting of Abuse by Priest

Amplify’d from www.nytimes.com

Kansas City Bishop Indicted in Reporting of Abuse by Priest












KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Roman Catholic bishop of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Robert Finn, and the diocese he leads have been indicted by a county grand jury on a charge of failure to report suspected child abuse in the case of a priest who had been accused of taking lewd photographs of young girls.


Archdiocese of Kansas City and St. Joseph, via Associated Press

The Roman Catholic bishop of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Robert Finn.


The indictment is the first ever of a Catholic bishop in the 25 years since the scandal over sexual abuse by priests first became public in the United States.


Bishop Finn is accused of neglecting to report abuse that occurred as recently as last year — almost 10 years since the nation’s Catholic bishops passed a charter pledging to report suspected abusers to law enforcement authorities.


The bishop has acknowledged that he knew of the existence of the photos last December but did not turn them over to the police until May.


During that period Bishop Finn and the diocese had reason to suspect that the priest, the Rev. Shawn Ratigan, might subject a child to abuse, the indictment said, citing “previous knowledge of concerns regarding Father Ratigan and children; the discovery of hundreds of photographs of children on Father Ratigan’s laptop, including a child’s naked vagina, upskirt images and other images focused on the crotch; and violations of restrictions placed on Father Ratigan.”


The indictment was announced on Friday by the Jackson County prosecutor, Jean Peters-Baker. It had been under seal since Oct. 6 because the bishop was out of the country. He returned on Thursday.


“This is about protecting children,” Ms. Peters-Baker said.


The bishop and the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph were charged with one count each, a misdemeanor.


Bishop Finn appeared in court at 1 p.m. and pleaded not guilty, as did lawyers for the diocese.


Bishop Finn said in a statement, “We will meet these announcements with a steady resolve and a vigorous defense.”


He said that he and the diocese had given “complete cooperation” to law enforcement. He also pointed to steps he had taken since the scandal first became public, which included commissioning a report to look into the case and reinforcing procedures for handling allegations of abuse.


Father Ratigan was arrested in May and has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of taking indecent photographs of young girls, most recently during an Easter egg hunt last spring.


His case prompted a civil lawsuit filed in August that asserts that between December 2010 and May 2011, Father Ratigan attended children’s birthday parties, spent weekends in the homes of parish families, hosted the Easter egg hunt and presided, with the bishop’s permission, at a girl’s First Communion.


The case has generated fury at a bishop who was already a polarizing figure in his diocese, and there are widespread calls for him to resign. Parishioners started a Facebook page called ’”Bishop Finn Must Go” and circulated a petition. An editorial in The Kansas City Star in June calling for the bishop to step down concluded that prosecutors must “’actively pursue all relevant criminal charges” against everyone involved.


Stoking much of the anger is the fact that only three years ago, Bishop Finn settled lawsuits with 47 plaintiffs in sexual abuse cases for $10 million and agreed to a long list of preventive measures, among them to report anyone suspected of being a pedophile immediately to law enforcement authorities.


Bishop Finn, who was appointed in 2005, alienated many of his priests and parishioners, and won praise from others, when he remade the diocese to conform with his traditionalist theological views. He is one of few bishops affiliated with the conservative movement Opus Dei.

Read more at www.nytimes.com
 

It is the Vatican A.K.A. Little John that has always been behind this idea Socialism, not the Government A.K.A. Robin Hood

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/300620_10150870268795437_736720436_21211530_1949489289_n.jpg



It is the Vatican A.K.A. Little John that has always been behind this idea Socialism, not the Government A.K.A. Robin Hood.



See: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/encyclicals/documents/hf_ben-xvi_enc_20090629_caritas-in-veritate_en.html



http://www.vatican.va/edocs/ENG0214/_INDEX.HTM



http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum_en.html



http://www.scribd.com/doc/22319643/Pope-Plans

Caritas in veritate - Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Benedict XVI

www.vatican.va

ENCYCLICAL LETTER CARITAS IN VERITATE OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF BENEDICT XVI TO THE BISHOPS PRIESTS AND DEACONS MEN AND WOMEN RELIGIOUS THE LAY FAITHFUL AND ALL PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL ON INTEGRAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHARITY AND TRUTH

Donate your organs and we'll pay your funeral costs: New NHS plans to tackle shortage of volunteers

Amplify’d from www.dailymail.co.uk

Donate your organs and we'll pay your funeral costs: New NHS plans to tackle shortage of volunteers

  • 'Reasonable' funeral costs of between £1,500 and £5,000 could be met
  • Report also recommends bigger payouts for egg and sperm donation in fertility treatment
Organ donors should have their funeral expenses paid by the NHS, according to a proposal to encourage millions more to sign up to the register.

The desperate shortage of suitable transplant organs has left 8,000 people in the UK on a waiting list for a life-saving operation. And while it takes an average of three years for a suitable donor to become available, three people on the list die every day.

With a typical funeral costing thousands of pounds, the proposal for the NHS to pay ‘reasonable’ costs of between £1,500 and £5,000 could be an incentive for many to join the Organ Donor Register.

The gift of life: Those who sign up for organ donation could have their own funerals paid for by the NHS in a bid to boost number on the donor register

The gift of life: Those who sign up for organ donation could have their own funerals paid for by the NHS in a bid to boost number on the donor register

Easing the burden: The NHS could be willing to pay 'reasonable' costs of a funeral for those whose donated organs have helped others

Easing the burden: The NHS could be willing to pay 'reasonable' costs of a funeral for those whose donated organs have helped others

However concerns have already been raised that families could end up ‘leaning on’ their sick relatives to sign up to the scheme to save funeral expenses.

The idea is outlined in a report from the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, which has spent 18 months investigating ways of boosting the supply of organs.

But it ruled out a change in the law to allow payment to donors, saying that it was important to retain the principle of altruism as it ‘underpins important community values’.

Its report also opposes an ‘opt-out’ scheme in which it is assumed that everyone consents to donation unless they remove their name from the register or their family objects after their death. Although a similar system is being considered in Wales, the report says ‘robust research’ is needed into whether it really makes a difference to donor rates.

Improvements: Donations have increased 25 per cent in recent years, partly due to more efficient running of hospital systems

Improvements: Donations have increased 25 per cent in recent years, partly due to more efficient running of hospital systems

Currently the Organ Donor Register is at a record level, with 18 million people – about 30 per cent of the population – signed up, but the NHS is aiming to increase this to 25 million by 2013. Black and Asian people often have to wait three times longer for a transplant, because of a shortage of donors in those communities.

Keith Rigg, a transplant surgeon at Nottingham University Hospital and one of the report’s authors, said they had ruled out direct financial incentives to encourage donors to join the register but believed that payment of funeral expenses by the NHS – an idea suggested by members of the  public – was ethically acceptable as only the family would benefit. He suggested that the NHS run a pilot project which involved payment of ‘reasonable’ expenses to anyone who signed up to the register and donated organs.

But Roger Goss, co-director of Patient Concern, said: ‘We worry that offering funeral expenses in return for organs may result in families leaning on sick relatives to donate, because it can save thousands of pounds.

‘The number of cases that already reach the Court of Protection because those holding power of attorney treat their charges as cash cows should be a warning that this is only too likely.’

The report recommends bigger payouts for people donating eggs and sperm for use in fertility treatment and research. Those helping others to have a child should, the report suggests, receive full expenses, including lost earnings, rather than being subject to the existing £250 cap.

Women donating eggs for research should also get a fee on top of expenses, in much the same way that patients testing medicines are rewarded.

Report chairman Professor Dame Marilyn Strathern said: ‘People who are willing to donate for other people’s treatment should not be left out of pocket.’

Urgent need: Every day three people die while waiting for an organ donor

Urgent need: Every day three people die while waiting for an organ donor

Read more at www.dailymail.co.uk
 

Offering free funerals to organ donors is tantamount to trading in body parts

Amplify’d from www.dailymail.co.uk

Offering free funerals to organ donors is tantamount to trading in body parts

Think, for a moment, of the care we unquestioningly lavish on the bodies of soldiers who have been killed in battle. Wherever they have fallen, their bodies are retrieved — often at tremendous risk — and transported back to the comparative safety of a main camp.

There they are washed and made ready for that final journey home. In flag-draped coffins, the bodies are flown back to Britain, where they are ceremonially greeted by a solemn guard of honour and by the sombre crowds who come to pay their respects to someone whose heroism has meant the  ultimate sacrifice.

No one who has witnessed the extraordinary scenes at Wootton Bassett and now at RAF Brize Norton can fail to realise how tremendously important honouring the bodies of the dead — and not only those of soldiers, but of leaders, rulers and ordinary, much-loved family members, too — is to human society.

Moving: The extraordinary scenes at Wootton Bassett and RAF Brize Norton illustrate the importance of honouring the bodies of the dead

Moving: The extraordinary scenes at Wootton Bassett and RAF Brize Norton illustrate the importance of honouring the bodies of the dead

It’s a deeply ingrained cultural tradition that goes back thousands of years.

But now, a recommendation from the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, an independent charity which reports on ethical issues, has put that tradition under a whole new set of pressures.

Faced with an intractable shortage of organ donors, they have suggested that people might be more amenable to signing up for donation if there was the promise that their funeral costs would be met by the NHS.

With the average funeral costing anywhere between £1,500 to £4,000, that represents a significant saving for an awful lot of people, and I expect that many, particularly those of modest means or facing financial pressures, would be very tempted.

It’s my firmly held belief, however, that this sort of temptation should not be placed before them.

Paying for organs is quite rightly illegal in this country but this, to all intents and purposes, is what the Nuffield Council’s recommendation amounts to.

Yes, it’s the bill for funeral costs that the NHS will be picking up, but what they get in return for that money is a whole new set of harvestable organs — heart, lungs, kidney, liver, eyes, and so on.

Wrong: Paying for organs is quite rightly illegal in this country but this, to all intents and purposes, is what the Nuffield Council¿s recommendation amounts to

Wrong: Paying for organs is quite rightly illegal in this country but this, to all intents and purposes, is what the Nuffield Council¿s recommendation amounts to

These could be worth hundreds of thousands of pounds — in 2009 it was revealed that 50 foreigners paid around £75,000 each for private transplants of NHS organs.

So paying for someone’s funeral would mean that their organs had been bought just as surely as those snapped up by the ailing millionaire who jets off to a developing country where fewer questions are asked — and the donor may not necessarily be dead.

The Nuffield recommendations could also prove socially divisive in a way that many would see as completely unacceptable in a supposedly civilised country. The offer of a couple of thousand pounds or so at some unspecified date in the hopefully distant future will make little difference to a relatively affluent member of the middle classes as they decide whether or not to fill in an organ donor card.

But to poorer people — many facing the prospect of leaving almost nothing to their heirs — it could represent a very considerable sum indeed.

Could it not even result in the sort of Dickensian nightmare in which a whole new army of organ donors has been recruited from the most needy groups in society? Might it not even bring the risk of vulnerable individuals being put under pressure by unscrupulous relatives? Neither scenario, surely, is something we want to see happen in this country.

The gift of life: Those who sign up for organ donation could have their own funerals paid for by the NHS in a bid to boost number on the donor register

The gift of life: Those who sign up for organ donation could have their own funerals paid for by the NHS in a bid to boost number on the donor register

Please don’t misunderstand me; I am not against organ donation in general. As I’ve just outlined, what I am against is anything that smacks of paying for organs, and I’m also against anything that deliberately underplays the significance of what is a very important and highly individual decision: whether to become an organ donor or not.

The recent Government initiative, for instance, which saw people being invited to sign up as organ donors when they applied for their driving licence, was a step in the wrong direction.

Most driving licences are applied for by young people, who will be brimful of youthful optimism and who, at the time they fill in the application, will be far more excited about the prospect of driving than having to give serious thought to what happens to their bodies when they are dead.

I fear that many will end up ticking the ‘Yes’ box without giving it a second thought.

But organ donation does require serious thought; that’s why the principle of ‘informed consent’ is so important. Those considering joining the organ donor register need to know exactly what they’re signing up for and, just as importantly, what the implications are for the relatives they leave behind.

This isn’t necessarily a subject you’d want to address over the breakfast table, but would-be donors need to appreciate that there’s a huge difference between a body that has had two kidneys and a couple of corneas neatly removed, and a body that has been harvested for multiple organs and other body parts — organs that these days, I’m told, could go to several different recipients.

An old friend of mine was asked about organ donation when her daughter was tragically nearing death, and suddenly realised that the questions she most wanted to ask were ‘how many?’ and ‘which ones?’

Some will say she was being unnecessarily squeamish — that what happens to a body when it’s dead doesn’t matter. But it’s important that my friend’s apparent squeamishness — a feeling I know she shares with many — shouldn’t be written off as unreasonable.

In fact, it goes to the absolute heart of who we are as human beings.

Cleansing, honouring and respecting the bodies of our dead is what we have always done. It’s a supremely human — and humane — rite, and being invited to violate it involves the breaking of a very deep taboo that is sustained by almost every religion and by many non-believers, too.

Humane rite: Cleansing, honouring and respecting the bodies of our dead is what we have always done in our culture

Humane rite: Cleansing, honouring and respecting the bodies of our dead is what we have always done in our culture

And yet medical science pulls us relentlessly in the other direction, as it becomes ever more accomplished in re-using the organs of the body — spare part surgery, if you like — and, as a direct result, lays ever stronger claims to the bodies of our dead.

That will be fine for the altruistic minority, but not for the more undecided majority whose reservations are deep-seated and deserve to be respected, not airily dismissed.

Such well-founded reservations should not be crudely ‘bought off’ in the manner the Nuffield Council is now suggesting.

Funeral costs are a red herring. If people really are having trouble with such matters, we should revive the old tradition of people putting away money for their funeral over time. But that really has nothing to do with the debate about organ donation.

Of course, no one can be unsympathetic to those whose lives are blighted by illnesses that could be cured by organ donation. But paying for organs is not the way forward.

We need a more open and honest approach that equips people with all the information they need to make their choice. But, we also need to respect them when they turn round and say ‘No’.

Read more at www.dailymail.co.uk
 

Bizarre case of the woman who says she went from age 23 to 73 in 'a few days'

Amplify’d from www.dailymail.co.uk

Bizarre case of the woman who says she went from age 23 to 73 in 'a few days'


  • Doctors speculate she may have entirely new syndrome
Nguyen Thi Phuong age 21
Nguyen Thi Phuong at 26

Rapid ageing: A mystery condition has apparently caused Nguyen Thi Phuong's face to sag and wrinkle over a matter of day. She is pictured aged 21 on the left and 26 on the right

These pictures may look like an attractive woman in her 20s and her grandmother.
But they are said to be the same person – apparently taken just days apart.

The young Vietnamese woman at the centre of the improbable medical case, Nguyen Thi Phuong, claims the transformation may have come about because of an extreme allergy to seafood.

Nguyen, 26, says she developed this puffy face and sagging skin in 2008 but was too poor to seek treatment. Earlier this month, doctors said they would examine her free of charge.

Nguyen’s husband, carpenter Thanh Tuyen, insists the story is true and his love has not faded for his once-beautiful wife.

She has always worn wear a mask in
public to hide her appearance from prying eyes, but she has now sought help from doctors to see if they can reverse the 'ageing' effect.

Displaying photos of a beautiful
21-year-old woman on her wedding day in 2006, Mrs Nguyen said: 'Five years
ago, I was rather pretty and not so ugly like this, right?'

Mrs Nguyen believes her condition was caused by a life-long allergy to seafood.

She said she had suffered a particularly bad reaction in 2008.

'I was really itchy all over
my body. I had to scratch even while sleeping.'

Phuong said she took
some medicine bought at a local pharmacy instead of going to the
hospital because her and her husband Tuyen, now 33, were too poor to
afford it.


She said: 'After one month of taking the drugs, I became less itchy but hives remained on my skin.

Then I switched to traditional medicine
and all the hives disappeared, together with my itching. However, my
skin began to sag and fold.'

Mrs Nguyen then took another kind of
traditional medicine to treat her rapid-aging skin problem - but to no
avail.

Doctors say it may have been the long-term use of traditional medicines that caused the condition as they are often spiked with corticoids. These steroids speed up the effects of the unregulated remedies but could also have triggered the rare skin disease mastocytosis, where the body produces too many mast cells.


The couple do not remember what the medicine was or which pharmacy they got it from.

Our love hasn't faded: Tuven said he still loved his wife but they hadn't had children as their lives were too difficult

Our love hasn't faded: Tuven (pictured) said he still loved his wife but they hadn't had children as their lives were too difficult


Mrs Nguyen said: 'We considered that it was
our destiny and I quit treatment in 2009. Now I always wear a face mask
whenever I go out.


'The skin on my face, chest and belly
have folds like an old woman who has given birth several times although I
have never had a child.

'But the rapid-aging syndrome hasn't affected
my menstrual cycle, hair, teeth, eyes and mind.'

In 2010, the couple
migrated to the southern province of Binh Phuoc's Bu Dop District where
they rent a small wooden house.

Mr Nguyen continued to work as a carpenter
while Phuong got a job at a cashew-nut processing factory.  Both earn a
total of less than £92 a month - which means they cannot
afford an examination at a major hospital in Ho Chi Minh City.

Tuyen said his wife's disease has not affected his love for her or their relationship.


He said: 'I married Phuong when she was a
beautiful woman. I have followed her through her disease and have never
been shocked at all.


'It's not easy to talk about one's own
marital affairs. Just simply understand that I still love her very
much.'

Mrs Nguyen said her husband's love is the reason she is able to
persevere in the face of adversity.


She said: 'He still loves me like before
despite the fact that I look old and ugly. With him, I feel more
confident to live and work.'


On October 2, doctors from Nguyen Dinh
Chieu Hospital in Ben Tre Province said they would examine Phuong for
free and send her to the HCMC Dermatology Hospital if they failed to
diagnose her condition.

There is already some disagreement among doctors over the cause of the rare condition.

THE MYSTERY CONDITION

It could be.... Lipodystrophy

This is a rare syndrome which causes a layer of fatty tissue beneath the surface of the skin to disintegrate while the skin itself continues to grow at a startling pace

It has no cure and leaves victims with loose folds of skin on their bodies as well as wrinkled faces and features of people much hold.

Only 2,000 people are thought to have the condition

Or it might be.... Cushing’s Syndrome

This can be triggered if a person has very high levels of a hormone called cortisol in their blood.

Common symptoms include weight gain, rounding of the face due to deposits of fat developing there and thinning of the skin.

It often occurs as a side effect of treatment with corticosteroids.

Women are five times more likely to develop endogenous Cushing’s syndrome than men, with most cases affecting people who are 25 to 40 years old.

Doctor Vo Thi Bach Suong of the HCMC University of Medicine and Pharmacy, said: 'She might have taken corticoid for a
long time. Many traditional pharmacists use corticoid in their medicine,
leading to side effects like swelled face and abnormally-growing skin
sections.'

Nguyen Hoai Nam, another lecturer at the university, agreed that Phuong may suffer from the wrongful use of corticoid.

He said: 'A sudden stop in using
corticoid could easily lead to Cushing's Syndrome, which is clearly seen
through affected skin.'

However, doctor Huynh Huy Hoang of
the HCMC Dermatology Hospital has doubts over this diagnosis.


He said: 'It's really strange. This is
the first time I've heard of such a case of rapid-aging process on an
adult. It's not lipodystropy syndrome.


'However, aging is not a common sign of Cushing's Syndrome either.'

Doctor Yen Lam Phuc of the Vietnam
Military Medical Academy agreed with Hoang, saying the rapid aging could
not be a side effect of a medical substance.  He said: 'It could be a
totally new syndrome.'

Meanwhile Tuyen said that he and his wife do not dare to have a child, even though they have been married several years, because their lives are so difficult.

He said: 'Our only wish is to have some philanthropists or doctors help my wife to make her normal face again.'

Doctor Hoang Van Minh from the Ho Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University Hospital claims Phuong, could regain some of her previous beauty with medical treatment. 

Dr Hoang visited Phuong this week at her house in the Mekong Delta province of Ben Tre where he said it was likely she did have mastocytosis. He said Phuong's face still swells and she is itchy with frequent diarrhoea, which are common signs of the disease.

There is currently no cure but there are many medicines to help treat its symptoms.

'She needs to be treated for her allergies first,' Dr Hoang said.

He added that his treatment plan could restore between 50-70 percent of her skin to normal and laser therapy could reduce the folds.

Dr Hoang said there should be more tests to verify his initial diagnosis and find any other diseases she might have.

Read more at www.dailymail.co.uk
 

D.C. Lemonade Sellers Get Year in Prison: Nightly News Report

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com






D.C. Lemonade Sellers Get Year in Prison: Nightly News Report



Rob demonstrates the total censorship of ron paul signs poster or even to meet.

http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/news/


See more at www.youtube.com
 

D.C. Lemonade Sellers Get Year in Prison: Nightly News Report

Phoenix Jones Stopped a fight PROOF (arrested pepper spray)

Real Life Super Hero Phoenix Jones To Appear In Seattle Court Today!

Radioactive Hotspots Found In Tokyo!

White - The Great Controversy Illustrated (Book)

Amplify’d from amazingdiscoveries.org


White - The Great Controversy Illustrated (Book)























Quick Overview


New Illustrated Great Controversy by Ellen White. Edition 1911.



$15.95


Read more at amazingdiscoveries.org