ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Denver archbishop speaks in Fargo

Chaput was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI in 2009 to lead the North American investigation of a sex and money scandal of a late priest in Mexico once feted by the Vatican. Many have criticized Chaput for not speaking out strongly enough against the priest abuse scandal in the church.

Amplify’d from www.grandforksherald.com

Denver archbishop speaks in Fargo

Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, known as one of the nation’s most visible and controversial Catholic leaders, spoke this past week in Fargo to the faithful, invited by his longtime spiritual “son,” Fargo Bishop Samuel Aquila.




By:

Stephen J. Lee, Grand Forks Herald

FARGO — Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, known as one of the nation’s most visible and controversial Catholic leaders, spoke this past week in Fargo to the faithful, invited by his longtime spiritual “son,” Fargo Bishop Samuel Aquila.

Chaput, 66, has been archbishop in Denver since 1997, after nine years as bishop in Rapid City, S.D.

Aquila, 60, spent his career as a priest in Denver until his appointment a decade ago as bishop in Fargo, a move no doubt aided by Chaput.

As archbishop, Chaput has made news and drawn criticism regularly that is disproportionate, perhaps, to the rank of the Denver archdiocese.

Several years ago, he was a prime mover in criticism of Catholic politicians, such as then-presidential candidate, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who support abortion rights.

Unhappy with how the New York Times reported that issue in 2004, Chaput admittedly since has “boycotted” the newspaper, refusing to talk to its reporters.

Chaput was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI in 2009 to lead the North American investigation of a sex and money scandal of a late priest in Mexico once feted by the Vatican. Many have criticized Chaput for not speaking out strongly enough against the priest abuse scandal in the church.

Chaput also has not been shy about criticizing what he saw as undue “adulation” of President Barack Obama, as well as elements of the president’s reform of health care.

John Allen, longtime journalist with the independent National Catholic Reporter and a top Vatican observer, has said Chaput is one of the 10 most “consequential” of about 300 U.S. bishops. Chaput qualifies not because his charge is big, such as New York, Philadelphia, Chicago or Los Angeles, Allen writes, but because of his work as “an evangelist, an opinion-maker, a writer and speaker.”

“Usually seen as a strong conservative, Chaput can be polarizing because he takes clear positions and defends them with relish,” Allen said in a March 2010 column in the NCR. “He’s consequential in somewhat the same way as politicians and pundits with bold views and the nerve not to pull their rhetorical punches: Love ‘em or hate ‘em, they’re hard to ignore.”

Born in Kansas, Chaput is the first U.S. archbishop who is an American Indian, a member of the Prairie Band of Potawatomi. He’s an inspiration to all American Indian Catholics, said David “Doc” Brien, an UND alumnus who is former chairman of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa in Belcourt, N.D., who came to hear Chaput with a handful of tribal members.

A group from the White Earth Band of Chippewa based in Mahnomen, Minn., also came to Friday’s luncheon to hear Chaput. They met afterward with Chaput in a private meeting to discuss issues affecting American Indians.

The Denver archbishop spoke to about 500 Thursday night in the Ramada Plaza and Suites in Fargo, and to about 150 Friday at a diocesan-sponsored lunch in Sts. Anne and Joachim’s parish hall, at which he spoke on developing a culture of life.

While in Fargo, Chaput demonstrated the plain-speaking style that gets him headlines.

Urging the Catholics, some of whom drove for several hours to attend the event, to work smarter and harder against abortion, Chaput warned them against allying too closely with any political party.

“Remember that renewing the culture, not gaining power, is our ultimate goal,” he said.

To do that, Catholics need to take their place in the public debate without apology, Chaput said.

“Critics like to say that religion is divisive or intellectually backward, or that it has no proper place in the public square,” he said. “This kind of defective thinking is now so common that any religiously grounded political engagement can be portrayed as crossing the border between church and state affairs. But this is nonsense. Democracy depends on people of conviction carrying their beliefs into public debate — respectfully, legally and non-violently, but vigorously and without apology.”

American tradition means infusing politics with morality and religion, he said.

“Real pluralism actually demands that people with different beliefs should pursue their beliefs energetically in the public square.”

Chaput also took a swipe at President Obama, saying he showed “a peculiar kind of vanity or cynicism or detachment from reality,” in signing a 2009 executive order removing the ban on federal foreign aid dollars going toward policies facilitating abortion.

“An issue like abortion — an issue that involves the life and death of unborn children and the subversion of entire traditional societies — can’t simply be ‘put behind us’ with an executive signature,” he said.

Chaput said the time he spent as bishop in Rapid City gave him a love for the “warmth and goodness” of “Dakotans — both north and south…”

“They also have a sanity that comes from their closeness to the land,” Chaput said. “In the Dakotas, if you behave like a fool in the way you treat the land, or the weather or the environment, well, very soon you’re a dead fool. So, Dakotans get character or they get gone pretty quickly.”

Reach Lee at (701) 780-1237; (800) 477-6572, ext. 237; or send e-mail to slee@gfherald.com
Read more at www.grandforksherald.com
 

How a nation lost its way and nobody shouted stop

How a nation lost its way and nobody shouted stop


Last Sunday the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Dublin, Dr Dairmuid Martin,
prostrated himself at the altar in Dublin's Pro-Cathedral in an act of
contrition for the victims of clerical sexual abuse.


With Boston's Cardinal Sean O'Malley, one of the senior clergy sent by the
Vatican to Ireland to help clear up the Irish mess, he washed the feet of
several victims.


Doubtless both men were sincere but they were accused by some of taking part
in yet another 'stunt' by the Catholic Church. People were asking why an act
of contrition should be carried out in front of the television cameras. Why
not do so privately and tell the world about it afterwards?


Whatever the motives of Dr Martin, who has been an honourable Catholic figure
during the prolonged clerical sexual scandal, his act of contrition was also
symbolic of the economic mess in which the Irish nation finds itself.


As the election results become clearer, it is doubtful if any set of Irish
politicians can deal effectively with the worst crisis to engulf that State
since its formation.


The bizarre election campaign made fascinating viewing, and I was struck by
the complexity of the economic arguments and by the way in which the Irish
politicians quickly got stuck into one another.


It was reminiscent of the worst days of the Troubles when our own television
encounters were ferocious and personal. At that time there was a degree of
wonder in the Republic that Northerners could be so tribal but the election
campaign across the border showed their politicians can be just as
bloody-minded.


The horrendous state of the Republic's economy is due mainly to the
irresponsibility of the bankers and developers, aided by the cronyism of
politicians, particularly Fianna Fail


There is also much evidence that many people in the Republic lost the run of
themselves. They bought and sold property with a naïve belief that there
would never be a day of reckoning, and a certain class lived as if the days
of wine and roses would continue for ever.


Some also thought that irresponsibility was to be admired, even in some of
their leading politicians, and that, if people could bend the rules without
punishment, good luck to all concerned. They were cute operators but
eventually they outsmarted themselves.


( There's a much better expression of this which has associations with "cute
ladies of the night", but perhaps not the language for a family
newspaper).


In the end the failure in the Republic was as much moral as financial but, in
the many years when the Irish gravy-train was trundling along, the churches
were largely silent.


They thundered rightly about the disease of sectarianism in the North but
turned a blind eye to the cancer of financial greed in their own backyard.


There were some honourable exceptions to this, including Cardinal Sean Brady,
before he was overtaken by the church's clerical child abuse crisis. He had
been asking pertinent question about whether or not the nation was losing
its way, and its historic identity, in the greed and callousness of the
get-rich-quick society.


More recently, however, the Irish churches have rediscovered their conscience
in this area, and there have been strong words from senior clergy about the
ills of Irish society, which are not just financial, and also of the need to
find a path to a more holistic society.


This moral compass will be needed in the days ahead and already some Irish
voices have been campaigning to default on part of their debts - and none
more so than Sinn Fein who, in moral terms, remain utterly blackened by the
murderous violence of their Provisional IRA fellow-travellers.


However, we in the North should not gloat. There is still plenty wrong with
our society, not least our ingrained ability to take almost everything,
including our financial benefits, for granted. We have lived for so long on
the back of subsidies that we would not begin to know how to go it alone.


Perhaps a few strong sermons up here about differentiating between 'God and
Caesar' would not go amiss. If we did not have London, or someone other
source, to blame for so many of our ills, what on earth would we do?

Read more at www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk
 

New Zealand earthquake closes Catholic institutions until inspection

New Zealand earthquake closes Catholic institutions until inspection

Christchurch, New Zealand, Feb 27, 2011 / 07:25 pm (CNA).- After a fierce earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand this week claimed the lives of 113 people, local Bishop Barry Jones announced on Feb. 25 that all schools and parishes in the area will remain closed until inspected by safety officials.

The Feb. 22 earthquake – which has been described as the country's worst natural disaster in history – killed 113 people, with a further 200 still reported missing. It struck at 12:51p.m. local time on Tuesday and registered as a 6.3 magnitude quake on the Richter scale.

Bishop Jones said that local Catholic schools and churches, many of which were significantly damaged, will remain off limits until engineers have ruled them safe for use.

The Sydney Archdiocese reported that Christchurch's Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament was severely damaged in the earthquake. The building lost its two towers and has severe cracks throughout its edifice. The cathedral had been closed for repairs since an earthquake in the area last September. The public have not been allowed inside within the last several months during the church's reconstruction.

Rescuers hoped that signs of life had been detected in the destroyed Holy Cross Catholic chapel in central Christchurch, but could not locate anyone as of Feb. 24. According to NZ Catholic paper, however, chapel administrator Fr. Raymond Schmack assured Bishop Jones that he was the last person to leave the chapel the day of the earthquake.

In Feb. 23 comments at the end of his general audience, Pope Benedict XVI asked Catholics to join him in prayer for the victims.

“At this time, my thoughts turn especially to the people there who are being severely tested by this tragedy,” he said.

He prayed that God relieve the survivors’ suffering and that he support all those involved in rescue work, Vatican Radio reports.

Archbishop Charles Daniel Balvo, the apostolic nuncio to New Zealand, said the earthquake in Christchurch is “far worse” than the one that hit the same area in September.

Earthquake victims are still trapped and the collapsed buildings are “so unstable that it is difficult for rescuers to find them,” he said.

“The city is still 80 percent without water and electricity and relief camps have been set up for the people,” he continued.

The archbishop told Vatican Radio that New Zealanders are grateful for the Pope’s message of solidarity and prayers.

“The New Zealanders are very resilient and very well organized,” he added. “They will do a great deal to help themselves.”

Read more at www.catholicnewsagency.com
 

Get updates via SMS by texting follow InquisitionNews to 40404 in the United States

Get updates via SMS by texting follow InquisitionNews to 40404 in the United States



Codes for other countries



Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

Country     Code     For customers of



Australia



* 0198089488 Telstra



Canada



* 21212 (any)



United Kingdom



* 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2



Indonesia



* 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel



Ireland



* 51210 O2



India



* 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon



Jordan



* 90903 Zain



New Zealand



* 8987 Vodafone, Telecom NZ



United States



* 40404 (any)

Boston College To Honor Pro-Abortion Jesuit

Amplify’d from www.thebcobserver.com

BC To Honor Pro-Abortion Jesuit


Written by Megan Rauch
BC to Honor Fr. Robert Drinan, S.J.

BC to Honor Fr. Robert Drinan, S.J.

A celebration honoring the life and work of Robert Drinan, a Jesuit and former Massachusetts congressman, will take place at the Boston College Law School.  The panel, which will take place on March 7, was announced on Friday, February 18, and will feature other pro-abortion speakers.

Among the members of the panel is Fr. Raymond Scroth, S.J., who has publicly supported pro-abortion political policy.  He has recently published a book entitled, Bob Drinan: The Controversial Life of the First Catholic Priest Elected to Congress.  Also scheduled for the panel is Congressman Barney Frank, whom the Cardinal Newman Society calls “a strident defender of legal abortion.” An article on Lifesitenews.com remarks that Frank’s “opposition to Church teachings is well-known in both personal and political life.”

Robert Drinan, a native of Massachusetts, graduated from Boston College in 1942.  That same year, he joined the Society of Jesus.  From 1956 to 1970, Drinan served as the Dean of the Boston College Law School.  In 1970, the Jesuit was elected to the House of Representatives, where he served for twenty years.

During his tenure in Congress, Drinan became notorious for his support of abortion, which drew considerable criticism both from the Church and other pro-life advocates.  In addition, Drinan is known for having influenced the Kennedy family into adopting pro-choice politics.

In 1980, following a request from Pope John Paul II that all priests withdraw from electoral politics, Drinan did not seek reelection.  From 1981 until his death, Drinan taught at Georgetown Law.

Despite ending his political career, Drinan remained an advocate for pro-choice.  In 1996, the Jesuit spoke out in favor of President Bill Clinton’s veto of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act.  According to a 1997 article in The Boston Globe, Drinan apologized for his support of the Act.  However, as the Cardinal Newman Society expressed, “Unfortunately, Father Drinan did not, to our knowledge, recant or apologize for his many years of support for legal abortion.”

The Cardinal Newman Society published an open letter to Father William Leahy, S.J., President of Boston College, urging him to reconsider hosting this event on campus.

Patrick J. Reilly, President of The Cardinal Newman Society writes, “Whatever Father Drinan’s contributions to Boston College over the years, and despite his perhaps laudable efforts on other human rights issues, his record on abortion should disqualify him from any honors by a Catholic institution.  To celebrate his legacy is a public dishonor to the souls of the millions slaughtered in the name of ‘choice.’  It would also seem to be a flagrant violation of the US bishops’ 2004 ban on honors for those who are opposed to Church teachings.”

He continues, “Father Leahy, on behalf of the members of the Cardinal Newman Society–including not a small number of BC alumni–and so many of the faithful working everyday to end the scourge of abortion, I prayerfully urge you to cancel this event immediately and to develop policies for Boston College that ensures that future honors conform to both the bishops’ sensible 2004 honors policy and Ex corde Ecclesiae.”

Persons who do not support the event on the Boston College Campus have been urged by both the Cardinal Newman Society and LifeSiteNews.com to contact Father Leahy.

  1. “Pro-Choice” vs. “Pro-Abortion” In this past issue, Megan Rauch’s article, “BC...

  2. Do Not Honor Fr. Drinan The reputation of the Jesuit order is damaged...

  3. Labeling Father Drinan Recently, The Observer has received an onslaught of...

  4. BC Law Defends Abortion Clinic Link Students who look up local pro-bono organizations on...

  5. Union Gives to Pro-Abortion Politicians BC service employees are required to pay dues...

Read more at www.thebcobserver.com
 

Jolting news for clergy abuse victim

Amplify’d from www.boston.com

Jolting news for clergy abuse victim

Read more at www.boston.com

CARDINAL SEAN O’Malley is washing the feet of Irish victims of clergy sexual abuse, a gesture of humility and penance offered on behalf of Pope Benedict XVI. But it takes more than symbolism to wash away terrible memories.

Last week, Jim Higgins received a call that brought his back.
Father James F. Talbot — a Jesuit priest who molested him when he was a teenager — is about to get out of prison, he was told by the Massachusetts Department of Corrections. The target release date is March 18. Talbot is asking to serve a three-year probation period in an out-of-state treatment facility.

Talbot will be free in a way his victims never will be, said Higgins, 55, who now lives in Florida.

“He gets to heave a big sigh of relief. The rest of us are stuck with it, ’’ he said.

In the early 1970s, Higgins had a part-time job at the rectory of the Immaculate Conception Church in Boston’s South End, where Talbot worked. In 2003, Higgins was one of 14 men who were part of an approximately $5.2 million settlement of civil claims against Talbot.

Most of the other plaintiffs were former students at Boston College High School, where Talbot taught history and economics and coached soccer and hockey from 1972 to 1980. His victims said the priest encouraged them to wrestle one-on-one with him, sometimes clad only in jockstraps, and then forcibly molested them. In 1980, Talbot was transferred to the Cheverus High School in Portland, Maine.

According to records kept by bishopaccountability.org, Talbot was removed from ministry and sent to St. Luke’s Center in Maryland in 1998, when a former student at Cheverus accused him of sexual abuse. In 2005, he pleaded guilty to the rape and assault of two boys who were BC High students in the 1970s. He was sentenced to five to seven years in prison.

A spokesperson for the Department of Corrections said Talbot is currently at the Massachusetts Treatment Center in Bridgewater. By law, Massachusetts cannot provide information about prisoner release dates, the spokesperson said.

“If Father Talbot received a jail sentence of one year for every innocent child he molested, he’d probably be in jail for the rest of his natural life,’’ said Boston lawyer Mitchell Garabedian, who has represented hundreds of sexual abuse victims, including some of Talbot’s accusers.

Putting old crimes behind them as new abuse allegations emerge continues to challenge the Catholic Church.

“We want to be part of a church that puts survivors, the victims of abuse, first — ahead of self-interest, reputation, and institutional needs,’’ said O’Malley in Dublin.

But, to survivors, the church still misses the mark.

As Higgins sees it, O’Malley is in Ireland “to clean things up as smoothly as possible.’’ His predecessor, Cardinal Bernard Law, “should have been imprisoned.’’ Instead, Law resigned and was relocated to Rome, where he has “a great life.’’ As for Talbot, “He’s not defrocked . . . There’s a certain amount of punishment he’s received, but not from the church.’’

The Boston Archdiocese referred a call for comment to the Society of Jesus in New England.

“We are committed to placing him in a secure and monitored location, given the grave nature of his crimes,’’ said Alice Poltorick, a spokeswoman for the Jesuits. She said there are no plans for Talbot to remain at a Jesuit residence following his release.

“A process is underway to remove him from the priesthood,’’ she said. In the meantime, “he continues to be fully restricted and will never be allowed any ministry.’’

To Higgins, that response is infuriating.

“In terms of the process underway to remove him from the priesthood — they’ve had years to do that,’’ he said. As Senator Scott Brown’s newly-released memoir reminds us, sexual abuse of children extends beyond any single institution. Brown’s childhood memories include a graphic description of being sexually assaulted by a counselor at a Christian summer camp on Cape Cod when he was 10. But for those preyed upon by Catholic priests, decades of denial are hard to forgive and impossible to wash away.

Joan Vennochi can be reached at vennochi@globe.com.

Read more at www.boston.com
 

Ways in which “Two and a Half Men” can survive without Charlie Sheen

Charlie Sheen’s character could be murdered by Eric Jon Phelps' 'Vatican assassins'. http://www.vaticanassassins.org/

Amplify’d from whenfallsthecoliseum.com
by Ricky Sprague
Defeating earthworms with his words.

Charlie Sheen and his poetic fingertips have been the source of great entertainment and speculation over the last several days. His antics have provided a much-needed distraction from events in that other part of the world where all that stuff is happening that I’m not really following anyway because it in no way affects me, and rising gas prices. But now that CBS and Warner Bros. have pulled the plug on the remainder of this season of his show “Two and a Half Men,” things have gotten a lot less funny and a whole lot more serious. After all,

If the show can’t return after this shortened season, it will still have a long life in re-runs and remain a cash cow. Warner Bros. still retains the syndication rights, and the show is watched almost as much in syndication each week as it is in primetime.


“Great would be an understatement,” said one studio insider asked to describe the show’s success, who said the show remains on-track to be a billion-dollar asset for Warner Bros. “This is one of the most successful sitcoms in the history of television.”

I have to admit that I have never watched more than a few minutes of the show. But given the importance of this program to the American economy, it is vitally important that it continue. It “is one of the most successful sitcoms in the history of television.”

It can’t die. Therefore I would like to present some suggestions as to how “Two and a Half Men” can continue its run.

I. Charlie Sheen’s character goes on an extended vacation with lots of beautiful women.

Although, as I’ve already stated, I have never actually watched the program, it’s my understanding that Mr. Sheen portrays a serial womanizer, who every night has sexual relations with a different woman, such as prostitutes and pornographic film stars. Perhaps the character could disappear (somewhere near the Bahamas?) with one or three or ten of these beauties. An entire season could be built around the “where is he this week?” theme. One of the characters could read postcards and emails from Mr. Sheen, in which he talks about things like,

I fire back once and this contaminated little maggot can’t handle my power and can’t handle the truth. I wish him nothing but pain in his silly travels especially if they wind up in my octagon. Clearly I have defeated this earthworm with my words — imagine what I would have done with my fire breathing fists.

That is probably as funny as anything that’s ever aired on this show before.

And of course, if CBS and Warner Bros. should decide that Mr. Sheen should return to work, his character would turn up back at home just as mysteriously as when he disappeared.

II. Charlie Sheen’s character is murdered by Vatican assassins.

Again, I’ve never actually seen the show, so I’m not sure how true this would be to the reality of it, but perhaps Mr. Sheen’s character could run afoul of the famous Vatican assassins, a group of assassins who work for the Vatican, apparently. They assassinate him, and the remaining characters are left to uncover the conspiracy that led to Mr. Sheen’s character’s assassination (I just looked it up — the character is actually called “Charlie”). My suggestion is that it turns out that Charlie was in fact the new messiah, who can cure with his mind, and the Vatican feared that Charlie would announce himself to the world and thereby diminish their power.

This might necessitate a change in direction for the show — away from humor and toward more serious subjects. But the advantage of this is that the show would continue. Moreover, in this scenario, the Uncle Charlie character could always return, risen from the grave, to continue his womanizing ways, should the contract negotiations go well between all parties.

III. Charlie Sheen’s character is recast.

My first choice to pick up where Mr. Sheen left off would be Alex Jones, the radio show host in whom Mr. Sheen has confided so often. I’m not aware of any acting that Mr. Jones has done, however, as a radio host, he does have some performance background. Moreover, the show’s writers could play to Mr. Jones’s strengths by doing an episode in which the newly recast “Charlie” brings home a beautiful woman from, let’s say France, who turns out to work for the United Nations. She’s there to both sleep with Charlie and arrange for the United Nations to annex the home in which the two and a half men live. And the United States government is going to just hand it over! So Charlie has to turn on the charm and sleep with women from both the United States government, and the burgeoning new one world government, in order to prevent his home being taken from him.

There’s an episode right there — and I’m not even a professional sitcom writer! Imagine what the real “Two and a Half Men” writers could do.

IV. Charlie Sheen’s character is horribly mutilated in an F-18 strafing accident, and must be covered in bandages for the duration of the program.

This is a variation on the “recast” suggestion above, except that in this case you could just cover some random stage hand in bandages, so that only “Charlie’s” mouth and eyes would be visible. Because his vocal chords were damaged in the aerial incident, Charlie wouldn’t sound like Charlie, but, oh, would he continue to womanize!

At the beginning of next season, Charlie could be in a coma. Everyone would wonder, “Will he come out of the coma?” And then finally, at the end of the first episode, a beautiful nurse comes in and starts giving him a sponge bath. Then the machine that monitors his vital signs starts to beep wildly, and the other characters look at each other and smile and say something like, “I think he’ll be getting up!” And then they all high five each other.

Then for the rest of the season, Charlie would walk around with the bandages on, having wacky adventures (another sample adventure: a Halloween-themed “mummy” episode), while Mr. Sheen and CBS and Warner Bros. continue to work their negotiation magic. Should Mr. Sheen return to the show, the bandages would come of and voila! There’s Uncle Charlie!

V. Charlie Sheen’s character goes back in time.

This one I admit is a little bit out there. But somehow — perhaps the little boy character has a science experiment, a la Steve Urkel? — Uncle Charlie is transported back in time, and begins bouncing around through history. His first stop, a meeting with Thomas Jefferson, whom he defeats in an Octagon after challenging him to a fist fight. Although we would never actually see Uncle Charlie on screen, the little boy character (sorry I don’t have time to look up his name) would read about him in his school history books.

Entire episodes could be built around how Charlie has changed history. The characters might wake up one day to find that Alcoholics Anonymous has been replaced by coffee and underwear strafing. And that instead of saying “Hello” as a greeting, people now say, “Stop trying! Just sit back and enjoy the show.”

So those of you who were worried about the future of “Two and a Half Men,” one of the most successful sitcoms of all time, don’t. There are plenty of ways the writers and producers can handle Mr. Sheen’s supposedly erratic behavior, and save the show so that everyone who has made billions of dollars from it can continue to do so.

Read more at whenfallsthecoliseum.com
 

Vatican confirms report of sexual abuse and rape of nuns by priests in 23 countries

Amplify’d from www.independent.co.uk

Vatican confirms report of sexual abuse and rape of nuns by priests in 23 countries

The Catholic Church in Rome made the extraordinary admission yesterday that it is aware priests from at least 23 countries have been sexually abusing nuns.

The Catholic Church in Rome made the extraordinary admission yesterday that it is aware priests from at least 23 countries have been sexually abusing nuns.

Most of the abuse has occurred in Africa, where priests vowed to celibacy, who previously sought out prostitutes, have preyed on nuns to avoid contracting the Aids virus.

Confidential Vatican reports obtained by the National Catholic Reporter, a weekly magazine in the US, have revealed that members of the Catholic clergy have been exploiting their financial and spiritual authority to gain sexual favours from nuns, particularly those from the Third World who are more likely to be culturally conditioned to be subservient to men.

The reports, some of which are recent and some of which have been in circulation for at least seven years, said that such priests had demanded sex in exchange for favours, such as certification to work in a given diocese.

In extreme instances, the priests had made nuns pregnant and then encouraged them to have abortions.

The US article was based on five documents, which senior women from religious orders and priests have presented to the Vatican over the past decade. They describe a particularly bad situation in Africa. In a continent devastated by Aids, nuns, along with early adolescent girls, are perceived by some as safe sexual targets. The reports said that the church authorities had done little to tackle the problem.

The Vatican reports cited countless cases of nuns forced to have sex with priests. Some were obliged to take the pill, others became pregnant and were encouraged to have abortions. In one case in which an African sister was forced to have an abortion, she died during the operation and her aggressor led the funeral mass. Another case involved 29 sisters from the same congregation who all became pregnant to priests in the diocese.

The reports said that the cultures in some African countries made it almost impossible for a young woman to disobey an older man, especially one seen as spiritually superior. There were cases of novices who applied to their local priest or bishop for certificates of good Catholic practice that were required for them to pursue their vocation. In return they were made to have sex. Some incidents of sexual abuse allegedly took place almost within the Vatican walls.

Certain unscrupulous clerics took advantage of young nuns who were having trouble finding accommodation, writing their essays and funding their theological studies.

Forced to acknowledge the problem, the Vatican has tried to play down its gravity. In a statement issued yesterday the Pope's official spokesman, Joaquin Navarro Valls, said: "The problem is known and involves a restricted geographical area. Certain negative situations must not overshadow the often heroic faith of the overwhelming majority of religious, nuns and priests".

One of the most comprehensive documents was compiled by Sister Maura O'Donohue, an Aids co-ordinator for Cafod, the London-based Catholic Fund for Overseas Development.

She noted that religious sisters had been identified as "safe" targets for sexual activity. She quotes a case in 1991 of a community superior being approached by priests requesting that the nuns be made available to them for sexual favours.

"When the superior refused the priests explained they would otherwise be obliged to go to the village to find women and might thus get Aids."Sister O'Donohue said her initial reaction to what she was told by her fellow religious "was one of shock and disbelief at the magnitude of the problem".

While most of the abuse happened in African countries, Sister O'Donohue reported incidents in 23 countries including India, Ireland, Italy, the Philippines and the United States.

She heard cases of priests encouraging the nuns to take the pill telling them it would prevent HIV. Others "actually encouraged abortion for the sisters" and Catholic hospitals and medical staff reported pressure from priests to carry out terminations for nuns and other young women.

O'Donohue wrote in her report how a vicar in one African diocese had talked "quite openly" about sex, saying that "celibacy in the African context means a priest does not get married, but does not mean he does not have children."

The head of the Vatican congregation for Religious Life, Cardinal Martinez Somalo, has set up a committee to look into the problem. But it seems to have done little beyond "awareness raising" among bishops.

More recently, in 1998, Sister Marie McDonald, mother superior of the Missionaries of Our Lady of Africa, put together a paper entitled The Problem of the Sexual Buse of African Religious in Africa and Rome.

She tabled the document to the Council of 16, made up of delegates of the international association of women's and men's religious communities and the Vatican office responsible for religious life. She noted that a contributing cause was the "conspiracy of silence".

When she addressed bishops on the problem, many of them felt it was disloyal of the sisters to send reports.

"However, the sisters claim they have done so time and time again. Sometimes they were not well received. In some instances they are blamed for what happened. Even when they are listened to sympathetically nothing much seems to be done" One of the most tragic elements that emerges is the fate of the victims. While the offending priests are usually moved or sent away for studies, the women are normally chased out of their religious orders, they are then either to scared to return to their families or are rejected by them. they often finished up as outcasts, or, in a cruel twist of irony, as prostitutes, making a meagre living from an act they had vowed never to do.

One of the few religious in Rome willing to talk about the report was Father Giulio Albanese, of MISNA, the missionary news agency. "Missionaries are human beings, who are often living under immense psychological pressure in situations of war and ongoing violence. On one hand it's important to condemn this horror and it's important tell the truth, but we must not emphasise this at the expense of the work done by the majority, many of whom have laid down lives for witness" said Fr Albanese "The press only talks about missionaries when they are killed, kidnapped or are involved in something scandalous" he added.

As the Vatican digests the unpalatable evidence of how their own priests are ruining the lives of their sisters, many Catholics hope a strong message may come from on high. With the American bishops, the Pope spoke in clear terms about paedophile priests, telling them this was a scourge that had to be faced. Some now hope that he may be equally courageous in denouncing an evil which has been covered by silence and shame for too long.

Read more at www.independent.co.uk