ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Cellphone Radiation Increases Brain Activity

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

Cellphone Radiation Increases Brain Activity

Radiation from a mobile phone call can make brain regions near the device burn more energy, according to a new study.

Cellphones emit ultra-high-frequency radio waves during calls and data transfers, and some researchers have suspected this radiation — albeit inconclusively — of being linked to long-term health risks like brain cancer. The new brain-scan-based work, to be published Feb. 23 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, shows radiation emitted from a cellphone’s antenna during a call makes nearby brain tissue use 7 percent more energy.

“We have no idea what this means yet or how it works,” said neuroscientist Nora Volkow of the National Institutes of Health. “But this is the first reliable study showing the brain is activated by exposure to cellphone radio frequencies.”

More than 5 billion mobile devices may be in use worldwide today. From behavioral quirks to brain cancer, researchers have looked for any health risks associated with cellphone radiation for years. Volkow said, however, that most research has produced conflicting results.

“These studies used only 14 people, at most, and looked at brain activity over brief time spans of about 60 seconds. A cellphone’s effect on the brain is very weak, so you lose statistical power with small sample sizes and durations,” said Volkow. “Our study had 47 usable subjects monitored over a long time to get us significant data.”

Cancer epidemiologist Geoffrey Kabat of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine said the work can’t and doesn’t offer any clinical predictions, but regarded it as the best to date on cellphone radiation’s effects on the brain.

“It’s a really even-handed look at this problem, and it shows a small effect that scales with exposure,” said Kabat, author of the book Hyping Health Risks.

Cellphones use ultra-high-frequency radio waves to connect with telecommunications networks. Antennas within phones emit the waves and, while the strength tails off quickly as distance from the antenna increases, a sizable chunk of it is beamed through the brain.

As a result, federal agencies require phone manufacturers to post information about how much radiation the body might absorb for each model, called its Specific Absorption Rate or SAR. Measured in watts per kilogram of tissue, it reveals how much radiation parts of the body are exposed to during use of a mobile device.

The simple cellphone used in Volkow’s study, a Samsung Knack phone popular in New York, has a peak SAR in the head of just under 1 watt per kilogram of tissue. The Phone 4 has a peak SAR in the head twice as high, while the sun’s average SAR can be 5 watts per kilogram across the body during sunbathing.

Some studies have suggested a small yet significant link between long-term cellphone SARs and certain brain cancers, including glioma, but most investigations have found no significant links. To help abolish uncertainty, the World Health Organization tasked a group of scientists around the world to research cellphone use and cancer. Their 2010 Interphone report showed no substantial link with mobile phone use and incidence of brain cancers, aside from a very small risk increase for long-term heavy users, and in fact found reduced rates for some types.

Still, Volkow said, understanding close-up and long-term exposure to cellphone radiation is important.

“The state of knowledge is really speculative. No studies have determined mechanisms for what we have seen, or other effects such as increased blood flow in the brain,” Volkow said. “I have spent hours on the phone with my sister every week, and have done it for years, so I would like to know if that’s harmful or not.”

Volkow and a team of researchers scanned the brains of 47 people with a cellphone attached to each side of their head. One phone was turned off, while the other had an active call going for 50 minutes. It was muted to prevent the audio from having effects on brain activity.

Twenty minutes into the call, clinicians injected a radioactive form of sugar into each person, then began imaging their brains with a Positron Emission Topography machine. Over the course of 30 minutes, the sugar pooled in the brain’s most active regions and revealed the energy use to the brain scanner.

Accounting for normal activity, the subjects showed about a 7 percent boost in sugar use on the side of the head where the active cellphone was.

Brain imaging physicist Dardo Tomasi of Brookhaven National Laboratory, who co-authored the study, said that’s several times less activity than visual brain regions show during an engaging movie.

“The effect is very small, but it’s still unnatural. Nature didn’t prepare our brains for this,” Tomasi said.

Although the mechanism for the effect and its long-term consequences aren’t known, Volkow said it’s cheap and worthwhile to take matters into your own hands.

“You don’t have to wait around on us for the answers. Just use a wired headset or the speakerphone function,” she said. “That keeps the phone far enough away to make it an insignificant risk.”

Image: A bottom-of-the-brain view showing average use of radioactive glucose in the brains of 47 subjects exposed to a 50-minute phone call on the right side of their head. (Nora Volkow/JAMA)

See Also:

Read more at www.wired.com
 

Adventists respond to New Zealand quake

Amplify’d from news.adventist.org

Adventists respond to New Zealand quake

February 22 temblor kills at least 65; Sanitarium grounds are triage area
Pablo Lillo/Adventist Review staff

In the wake of devastation and death spawned by a magnitude 6.3 earthquake that struck Christchurch, New Zealand's city center today, Seventh-day Adventists in the South Pacific are responding with material and spiritual support.



At least 65 people are known to have been killed, and another 100 are trapped in collapsed buildings, the New Zealand Herald reported. Unlike the 7.1-magnitude quake, which hit the same area last September, this temblor struck closer to downtown Christchurch, and in midday, when office workers and shoppers were abundantly present.

The denomination's Sanitarium Health Food Company in Papanui has been asked by Emergency Services in Christchurch, New Zealand, to provide a triage center for the injured. The Christchurch Hospital, the largest tertiary teaching and research hospital in the South Island, was evacuated due to safety concerns and is now only admitting people with serious injuries.

Pierre van Heerden, general manager for Sanitarium in New Zealand, said the site has been made available.

"We're blessed to have little damage to our buildings and to serve the wider community in times of devastation. The Christchurch factory in Papanui has a large garden and extra space for people to congregate and use as a triage center. We have a borehole on site that is functioning and that will give us an opportunity to provide fresh drinking water to the Christchurch community." Sanitarium also plans to provide Weet-Bix, milk and bottled water for those in need.

Craig Gillis, president of the church in South New Zealand said, "At this time it is difficult to get much information about what has happened due to communication channels being blocked and overloaded. Our office staff are all fine. Christchurch Adventist School students, teachers and staff are fine, as are the preschools."

At this stage there aren't any reports on church members.

The earthquake is reported to have lasted approximately a minute with extreme violence -- rocking buildings back and forth. There are reports of absolute devastation in the city center of Christchurch as buildings have collapsed.

There are reports of people trapped in rubble in the central business district and emergency services report there aren't enough ambulances to serve the injured and fatalities.

"We're shocked at what's happening in Christchurch," said Barry Oliver, president of church's South Pacific Division. "We want to assure the people of Christchurch and our Church community of our support. I invite everyone to pray for safety and a sense of peace."

Read more at news.adventist.org
 

Indiana Deputy AG Fired For Suggesting Use of ‘Live Ammunition’ Against Protesters

Amplify’d from gawker.com


TPM


Indiana Deputy AG Fired For Suggesting Use of 'Live Ammunition' Against ProtestersThis week, a Mother Jones editor named Adam Weinstein got into a Twitter tête à tête with an Indiana lawyer who called on riot police in Madison to use "live ammunition" to clear protesters out of the state Capitol.

It turned out that lawyer, Jeff Cox, is a deputy attorney general in the state. And — perhaps unsurprisingly — he's left a long online trail of controversial statements and diktats.

"[A]gainst thugs physically threatening legally-elected state legislators & governor?" he tweeted back at Weinstein. "You're damn right I advocate deadly force."

Six days ago he opined, "Planned Parenthood could help themselves if the only abortions they performed were retroactive."

And on his personal blog, Pro Cynic (now deleted), he compared former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich to a Nazi, and concluded that George W. Bush's words to the Iraqi people — "Your enemy is not surrounding your country, your enemy is ruling your country" — are appropriate for citizens of America under Barack Obama, among other inflammatory statements.

Bryan Corbin, a spokesman for the Attorney General's office told Mother Jones "We do not condone any comments that would threaten or imply violence or intimidation toward anyone." Corbin did not respond to an inquiry Wednesday morning. I subsequently tried to reach Cox directly but was redirected back to Corbin's office

It's worth noting that there are over 140 deputy attorneys general in Indiana. It's a career job, not a political appointment. And Cox last tweeted just after midnight on Monday, more than 48 hours ago.

Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels did away with public sector unions in his state in 2006.

Update: Corbin sent over the following statement in response to our requests:

An immediate review of this personnel matter is now under way to determine whether the assertions made in the "Mother Jones" article about an employee are accurate. When that review is complete, appropriate personnel action will be taken.

The Indiana Attorney General's Office does not condone the inflammatory statements asserted in the "Mother Jones" article and we do not condone any comments that would threaten or imply violence or intimidation toward anyone. Civility and courtesy toward all constituents is very important to this agency. We take this matter very seriously.

The subjects of the offensive postings are not related in any way to this employee's job duties. The reporter who wrote the "Mother Jones" article informs us that the offensive postings over the weekend were made using a personal Twitter account and personal email, not a state government email account.

As public servants, state employees should strive to conduct themselves with professionalism and appropriate decorum in their interactions with the public. This is a serious matter that is being addressed.

Yes, Mr. Jeffrey Cox is a deputy attorney general hired during the previous administration of the former Attorney General. Mr. Cox continued on in the same position when the current administration took office. He was hired on qualifications, it is not a political appointment. He is one of 144 attorneys who work for this agency and he does not have any supervisory or managerial role. He does not work at the Indiana Statehouse.

[Update from Gawker: The Indiana AG's office has released another statement saying Cox is "no longer employed by this agency."]

Read more at gawker.com
 

Muammar Gaddafi’s Most Memorable Fashion Moments

Amplify’d from gawker.com



Brian Moylan


Muammar Gaddafi's Most Memorable Fashion MomentsMuammar Gaddafi's Most Memorable Fashion MomentsEmbattled Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi hasn't just made a mess of his country. He's made more fashion faux pas than the Middle East has had wars since the beginning of time. Here are all the insanely outre outfits that would land him on the worst-dressed list, if putting him on that list wouldn't get you shot. [Photos via Getty, AP]
Muammar Gaddafi's Most Memorable Fashion Moments
See more at gawker.com
 

Why Aren’t Americans Shopping at Wal-Mart Any More?

Amplify’d from gawker.com








Hamilton Nolan


Why Aren't Americans Shopping at Wal-Mart Any More?Box-shaped trinket warehouse Wal-Mart announced its fourth quarter sales figures yesterday, and the news was dark: although profit was up, sales at its U.S. stores fell for the seventh straight quarter. Why don't we love our Wal-Marts, any more?

Remember: Wal-Mart is as all-motherfucking-American as it gets, next to NASCAR and Sizzler. There is no retail outlet—or, indeed, corporation of any sort—that embodies the "dominate the world with too much of everything" American ethos better than Wal-Mart. Everything, as cheap as possible, under one roof. Put every store on Main Street America out of business, in favor of one huge box surrounded by an endless parking lot. Squeeze suppliers, squeeze manufacturers, squeeze wages, kill unions. Squeeze every last penny out of the price, at all costs, and leave your customers with no choice but to shop at Wal-Mart. (And work at Wal-Mart.)

The standard explanations for Wal-Mart's recent American decline: competition from grocery stores, competition from dollar stores, competition from convenience stores, competition from online retailers. Some of the company's strategic moves designed to attract wealthier, more fashionable shoppers turned out to be failures. Not to mention the fact that Wal-Mart has so saturated the country with its stores that new locations now routinely run the risk of cannibalizing another Wal-Mart's sales. Which is why the company is determined to carpet the few remaining Wal-Mart-free urban areas of America with—that's right—Wal-Marts.

But that's just pennies in a big jar. Wal-Mart's stock is lackluster. The company's besieged by business competitors, due to its default position on top, and by political enemies, due to its well-known fucked-upedness. Remember K-Mart? Sears Roebuck? Montgomery Ward? They were powerhouses once, too. Time passed them by. America forgot them. None had the same resources that Wal-Mart does today. But they all suffered the fate that Wal-Mart now fears: they lost their mojo.

If Wal-Mart continues a slow decline until it just shrivels and shrinks and turns into just another ugly store on the edge of the town, a kind of seedy one, the one you go to alone, when you need something utilitarian and cheap that doesn't have to impress anyone... well, that would just about restore my faith in America. Until the next Wal-Mart comes along.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Cops lose battle over shot-citizens data

Amplify’d from www.nypost.com

By DAREH GREGORIAN

A Manhattan judge has ordered the NYPD to release data on police shooting incidents that it had been fighting tooth and nail to keep private.

In a decision made public yesterday, state Supreme Court Justice Emily Jane Goodman ruled the cops must turn over two kinds of reports that are filed after every shooting incident involving a civilian to the New York Civil Liberties Union.

She ordered the NYPD to turn over data dating back to 1997, but said they can withhold information identifying police, victims and witnesses from the documents.

The NYCLU had been trying to get the two types of reports created after cops fire their weapons at civilians -- one that's done 24 hours after the shooting and the other 90 days later -- since early 2009.

"Once again, the courts have rejected the NYPD's pattern of withholding information from the public," said NYCLU executive director Donna Lieberman.

Lawyers for the NYPD had put forward a laundry list of reasons why they believed the reports should be completely withheld, including arguing that it would interfere with investigations, discourage witnesses from cooperating, and because their release could be an "unwarranted invasion of privacy" for those involved.

Goodman said the NYPD's stance flew in the face of the Freedom of Information law, and she ordered the reports be released -- but without the names of the officers, victims and witnesses involved. Jesse Levine of the city Law Department said his office was weighing an appeal. Police Commissioner Ray Kelly declined comment, saying he had not yet read the decision.

Read more at www.nypost.com
 

"Shariah" law in the city of Dearborn, Mich., there have been "honor killing" murders that have been "covered up.

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

Lawsuit: 'Honor killings' OK by Michigan Shariah

Plaintiffs challenge city's official cooperation with Islamic interests

GLOBAL JIHAD

By Bob Unruh




© 2011 WorldNetDaily


A lawsuit that challenges the official cooperation by the city of Dearborn, Mich., which has one of the largest populations of Muslims in the U.S., with Islamic interests makes a stunning allegation: that under the recognized "Shariah" law in the city, there have been "honor killing" murders that have been "covered up."

The lawsuit was brought by the Thomas More Law Center on behalf of four Christians whose speech and other civil rights were restricted by official city action at several recent city-sponsored Arab Fest events.

The lawsuit on behalf of Acts 17 Apologetics, Nebeel Qureshi, David Wood, Paul Rezkalla, Negeen Mayel and Joshua Hogg names as defendants the city of Dearborn, Mayor John. B. O'Reilly, Police Chief Ronald Haddad and a long list of police officers in addition to American Arab Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Fay Beydoun and Norma Haidous, the special events coordinator for the American Arab chamber.

Officials in the offices of both O'Reilly and Haddad said they were unable to respond to questions about the case, which seeks a court order halting the city's practices regarding speech and distribution of literature on public property at the city's Arab Fest during the summers.

It also seeks compensatory and punitive damages from the defendants.

The allegation about the honor killings that have been "overlooked" in Dearborn comes on Page 61 of the 96-page complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan today.

Describing the circumstances under which police arrested the Christians and ordered them to spend a night in jail - rather than officers viewing readily available exculpatory evidence that ultimately cleared the missionaries of the charges - the complaint notes that during the booking of the Christians at the city jail, "a sympathetic city police officer told plaintiffs Qureshi and Rezkalla that some of the police officers were 'on their side,' 'agreed with what they were doing' and 'didn't think they did anything wrong,' or words to that effect."

The comments simply were "demonstrating further that defendants retaliated against plaintiffs for their religious speech activity," the complaint explains.

"The sympathetic police officer told plaintiffs that the security personnel hired for the Arab Festival were mostly 'criminals and gang members,'" the complaint explained. Then it continued:

"The sympathetic police officer told plaintiffs that there were instances in the city where 'honor killings' permitted by Shariah had taken place, but they were covered up," the complaint alleges.

There were available no further details about the honor killings, which are murders committed by Muslims to protect or restore the "honor" of their families against their own family members who may have somehow created "dishonor," such as refusing to cooperate with an arranged marriage, or marrying outside of Islam.

The civil rights complaint stems from two separate police actions at the June 2010 annual International Arab Festival.

Richard Thompson, TMLC president and chief counsel, noted the high percentage of Muslims in the Dearborn community.

"Muslims dominate the political and law enforcement process in Dearborn. It seems that police were more interested in placating the mayor and Muslims than obeying our Constitution. Shariah law makes it a crime to preach the Gospel to Muslims. This is a classic example of stealth Jihad being waged right here in America. And it should be a wake-up call for all patriotic Americans,” he said.

The first situation developed June 18 when police jailed four Christian missionaries when they witnessed Nabeel Qureshi, a Muslim convert to Christianity, peaceably discussing his Christian faith with Muslim youths.

The other three, David Wood, Paul Rezkalla, and Negeen Mayel, were arrested along with Qureshi for allegedly "breaching the peace," and were led away in handcuffs by police while Muslim onlookers cheered and applauded.

See the arrest:

The second situation developed just days later, on June 20, as two missionaries, Rezkalla and Joshua Hogg, stood on the public sidewalk handing out the Gospel of John to passersby willing to take them.

According to the TMLC, the Christians were there for approximately five minutes when eight city police officers descended upon them, seized them, and brought them to the police command trailer located inside the festival where the Christians were admonished, photographed, and ordered to stop their peaceful religious activity.

The TMLC said, "It is evident that city officials, including the mayor, engaged in this unconstitutional official action solely to please this significant voting bloc and to submit to its will," referring to the Muslim population.

"While the videos of the police violating the fundamental constitutional rights of our clients are utterly shocking, it is perhaps even more shocking that city officials, including the mayor, would engage in a propaganda campaign to smear the good reputation of these Christians even after they were acquitted by a jury of the bogus criminal charges. All of this is strong evidence of the fact that Shariah is negatively influencing the city and its officials," said Robert Muise, TMLC’s senior trial counsel who is handling the matter.



The complaint explains that Acts 17 Apologetics was targeted by Dearborn police officers specifically because ministry members reach out with the Christian message to Muslims, but under Shariah, trying to encourage Muslims to leave Islam is illegal

"Through its expressive activities, Acts 17 and its members directly challenge Muslim beliefs and the Muslim juridical code know as Shariah," the complaint says.

The city's liability for the events is established because, "the city is actively involved in the conduct and support of the Arab Festival, providing numerous services from various city departments, including the police, fire, public works, economic & community development and recreation departments. Consequently, the city is a joint partner in the operation of the festival."

The complaint explains that from 2004-2008 Christian missionaries roamed the perimeter of the festival freely, handing out religious literature and discussing their Christian faith.

But then Haddad was installed as a new police chief and other staff changes were made, and the result was that Christian missionaries' speech suddenly was excluded from the public grounds.

After the 2010 confrontation, the lawsuit alleges, city officials illegally confiscated the missionaries' cameras, which revealed exculpatory evidence, and then made false statements about their activities.

The case alleges violations of the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and 14th Amendment as well as assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress.


WND just days ago reported on an appeal in the only conviction that resulted from the city police efforts to close down the Christian testimony.

According to the Thomas More Law Center, whose attorneys have filed the appeal with the Circuit Court for Wayne County, Mich., the city ordinances in Dearborn require that if a police officer wants his orders followed, he or she has to be acting "in the lawful performance of his duty."

However, testimony at the trial revealed that it was legal for the filming to be taking place where it was, and the law firm is arguing that a police officer "who violates the constitutional rights of a private citizen is not 'acting in the lawful performance of his duty.'"

It was Nageen Mayel, 18, who was convicted in Dearborn District Court for failing to obey a police officer's order. The order had been for her to turn off the camera that she was using to film fellow Christian missionaries at the Arab Festival.

"Astonishingly, at the trial, the officer admitted that the filming by Mayel was, in fact, not a crime," the law firm said.

All four Christians had been charged with breach of the peace for talking about Christianity with Muslims, and all four were acquitted. Mayel's conviction was the only one to result from the police action against the Christians.

The law firm explained the officer ordered her to turn off her video camera, "then forcefully grabbed Mayel's arm and camera, placed her in handcuffs, and had her locked up in the city jail."

The issue strikes directly at the heart of what many fear is developing across the nation: Muslims being given special treatment that subjects those of other faiths to second-class status. Other Christian groups paid for booth space at the festival, officials said, and were restricted to those locations. But these four individuals, who are linked to the Acts 17 Apologetics ministry group that Wood and Qureshi founded, simply attended and talked about their faith.

The longer video of the situation as it developed:

A similar problem had developed in 2009:

Dearborn Mayor O'Reilly earlier released a five-page letter defending the police department's actions.

"The City of Dearborn has been under attack for several years by a group identifying themselves as Acts 17 Apologetics," he wrote. "They arrive in Dearborn with the intent to disrupt a local cultural festival and misrepresent facts in order to further their mission of raising funds through emotional response."

Sponsored Link: Is this the End of America as we know it? Very few Americans are prepared for a day that will likely occur in the next 12 months, and will change our country forever. Eye-opening video explains the full story...
Read more at www.wnd.com
 

Those in uniform targeted for more social experiments: Cross-dressers, drag queens, she-males

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

Those in uniform targeted for more social experiments

What's next for military? Cross-dressers, drag queens, she-males

IN THE MILITARY

By Frank York




© 2011 WorldNetDaily


Barack Obama is being pressured by a team of activists to issue an executive order that would require the U.S. military to permit those individuals with a mental disturbance known as Gender Identity Disorder – including cross-dressers, drag queens, transsexuals, she-males and the so-called "intersexed" – to serve openly.

Lesbian, "gay," bisexual and transgender activists only in the last few months have been successful in getting Congress to overturn a 1993 law banning homosexuals from open service in the military. That process still is continuing, as the change required military leaders to affirm there would be no problems with battle unit readiness and effectiveness.


Now spearheading the new effort is the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an activist group whose leaders want Obama issue an executive order to force the Pentagon to ban immediately discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity (code for transsexuals, cross-dressers, drag queens, and she-males).

The group wants the same "rights" for individuals who have mental disturbances known as a Gender Identity Disorder (GID) or Transvestic Fetishism – both listed as mental illnesses in the APA's "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders" (DSM-IV-R).

LGBT activists on college campuses across the U.S. also are attacking the military and the ROTC for banning of transgendered and intersexed individuals from service.

The Harvard Political Union held a roundtable discussion recently on the university and its relationship to the military and ROTC.

Sandra Y.L. Korn, one of the editors of the "Harvard Crimson," complained that even though Congress voted to repeal the 1993 law banning homosexuals from serving openly, the military still bans "intersex" individuals and those with a differing gender identity.

An "intersex" person was formerly known as a hermaphrodite – with ambiguous sex organs. According to Korn, "Discrimination against a small minority is still discrimination."

At Columbia University, the student senate recently convened a Task Force on Military Engagement to discuss Columbia's relationship with the military and the ROTC.

On the first day of several task force discussions, Sophomore Janine Balekdjian complained that Columbia should not permit the ROTC back on campus because the military still allegedly violates the university's non-discrimination policy on gender identity.

"Even though DADT has been repealed, the transgender individuals still can't serve in the military as per military policy, and the same people [can't] participate in ROTC. That still, to my understanding, violates the university's discrimination policy because gender identity is a protected category."

On the second day of the Columbia task force discussions, a wounded Iraq veteran named Anthony Maschek, took the stage to defend the military and to warn the students that there are enemies out there who hate them and want to kill them.

The Columbia students laughed at him, jeered and called him a racist for defending the military and the ROTC.

At Stanford University, the Stanford Students for Queer Liberation is lobbying against the re-introduction of ROTC at Stanford and at other universities such as Columbia.

According to Queer Liberation President Alok Vaid-Menon, "Now, more than ever, is the time for college students across the country to take a stand and organize against transgender discrimination, an issue that has been historically ignored by the mainstream gay rights agenda."

What's Next: An intersexed/transgendered army?

Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, believes that the introduction of openly serving "gays" and lesbians will cause disruptions and morale problems in the Armed Forces. However, the introduction of so-called transgendered and intersexed persons into the military could be as much, if not more, disruptive.

Donnelly recently sent a list of proposed questions to members of the House Armed Services Committee over repeal of the 1993 law – including how will the military deal with transgendered soldiers. She wants the House committee chairman to direct these questions to Pentagon officials when the committee holds hearings on the repeal of the law which bans homosexuals from serving openly in the military. No such hearing is yet scheduled.

Donnelly notes that the 1993 law has not yet been officially repealed. The president, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen all must certify that the repeal will not harm military readiness before the 1993 law is eliminated. But, they are all committed to repeal.

According to Donnelly, the House Committee members are the ones who will be tasked with "writing inquiries to the Pentagon and I'm hoping that the Pentagon will provide answers in a timely way. It doesn't look like they will, though."

Confusion has existed for years over the DADT policy and the actual 1993 law passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton.

Donnelly explained the difference between DADT and the 1993 law, "'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' was imposed administratively by Bill Clinton shortly after he signed the actual law. He came out with these regulations that confused the meaning of the law itself," she said.

The 1993 law banned homosexuals from serving in the military. The muddled DADT policy imposed on the military by Clinton said homosexuals could serve if they didn't tell anyone about their chosen sexual lifestyle. His DADT policy violated both the spirit and intent of the law.

In her document sent to the House Armed Services Committee, Donnelly included a series of questions – not only on homosexuals serving in the military – but also on what impact transgenders will have if they are permitted to serve in the military. On the subject, she is asking:


  • Q: Will recruiters be required to induct transgendered persons or individuals who desire "gender reassignment" treatment and surgery? If not, what would the rationale be?


  • Q: What will the Defense Department policy be with regard to uniform differences, exceptions, or alterations for men transitioning to female appearance and women transitioning to male appearance?


  • Q: What will the Defense Department policy be with regard to military medical services and medications for transgendered personnel, to include hormone treatments and surgery to change sexual appearance and identity for personnel seeking gender "re-assignment?"



  • Q: What is the estimated annual cost of providing such services to transgendered personnel and those seeking gender "re-assignment?"


  • Q: What will the Defense Department policy be with regard to the housing of transgendered biological males living with females, and vice versa?


  • Q: Will a man who shows up for duty in a regulation female uniform, or a woman in a man's uniform, be considered appropriately dressed? What would be the rationale for denying that opportunity on an equal basis to male and female cross-dressers or transgenders?


  • Q: Will the military services allow a man to wear only approved male garb on-base, but female dress off-base? If so, how does this affect the principle that military regulations apply both on-base and off-base, 24/7?


  • Q: Will the military services allow LGBT individuals or couples to participate in social events dressed in ways that reflect their sexuality, in the same way that women dress to please men?

Other legitimate questions must be asked as well. How will the military deal with showers and restroom facilities for individuals who believe they are the opposite sex – or who are in so-called "transition" from male to female or female to male? How will male soldiers, sailors and marines handle a woman who has had her breasts surgically removed taking a shower with them? Will female soldiers, sailors and marines want to shower with a man who has had his sex organ removed and is taking hormone injections to enlarge his breasts?

Will the military be faced with inducting gender confused individuals who wish to have the American taxpayer fund their sex change operations?

Worse yet, how will the military deal with she-males – individuals who deliberately undergo only a partial sexual reassignment? These are typically males who keep their sex organs, but take hormone injections to enlarge their breasts.

The U.S. Air Force reports it already has started training programs for Air Force personnel on how to deal with open homosexuality. The training for the rest of the service branches begins on March 1.




If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WND poll.

Read more at www.wnd.com
 

Pentagon Looks to Militarize the Cloud

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

Pentagon Looks to Militarize the Cloud

Store tactical military data on distributed servers, accessible through networked computers or mobile devices? Ask most officers about cloud computing and they’ll look at you patronizingly and say: Yes, Google Docs is nice, but it’s not secure enough for our secrets. (I write from experience.) But Darpa’s new budget shows that it wants the military all the way up into the cloud, and plans to set up mobile wireless hotspots so troops can reach the cloud from the most connectivity-forsaken places.


Appropriately, the goal of getting big data files to troops on the move in the middle of nowhere is, well, distributed between two new programs from the Pentagon’s blue-sky researchers. Cloud to the Edge looks to essentially ape Google’s tools (other than search) to create a military cloud. And Mobile Hot Spots wants to carry connectivity anywhere troops need to share those big data files.


Wherever the military goes, it brings bandwidth with it. But it’s easier to set up networks around big bases than it is to have them follow troops in the field, especially if those troops have to send or receive large data packets, like video from drones overhead. Some companies are combating the problem by mounting cell towers under the bellies of drones, beaming connectivity below.


Mobile Hot Spots is Darpa’s way to even out what it calls the “100-1000x mismatch of data needs and available network capacity.” Starting out with a $10 million request to Congress, it looks to “create high-capacity and secure wireless technologies by exploiting advances in high-frequency and new security paradigms using RF, millimeter wave (MMW) and/or optical transmission.” If approved, it’ll spend its first year of life developing hardware and network architecture for the mission. And it’s considering going the under-drone route, proposing to “explore hardware, software, and waveform options to include unmanned aerial systems, soldiers, and mobile platforms connected into network topologies.”


Then there’s the place where the data carried over those networks will reside. Cloud to the Edge has no problem distributing that around through the ether. Unlike Mobile Hot Spots, it’s not even asking for money yet — perhaps because what it’s proposing is so ambitious it first needs to see about feasibility. Not only will it store data in “distributed servers and advanced networking and information database technologies,” it seeks to minimize human interaction in retrieving the data, “autonomously seek[ing] out relevant information and mov[ing] it to where it is needed in a timely and assured manner.”


The budget proposal doesn’t give any hint about how it’ll do that yet, proposing for now just to study “information flow patterns through the regional and localized network” and write software for “distributed data dissemination.”


Neither does Darpa explain how to keep its Cloud secure. Instead, it flips the security question back around, asserting that the “current centralized or regional storage and dissemination of information presents security, reliability, and capacity challenges in identifying and getting relevant information to users at the edge.”


At a time when Special Operations Forces are turning to Android-powered tablets to read their data in the middle of nowhere, Darpa looks to be focused on setting up the supporting infrastructure that lets U.S. troops access more information in more remote areas. It might not be Google Docs. But it’s something.


Photo: U.S. Air Force


See Also:


Read more at www.wired.com