ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Shhhh! Public Universities Sue to Hide (Muslim, Foreign) Donors

Amplify’d from www.debbieschlussel.com

What is the University of Connecticut trying to hide?

An important case before Connecticut’s Court of Appeals is getting scant attention.  But the outcome of University of Connecticut v. Freedom of Information Commission et al. could decide whether you and I can which foreign Muslim caliphates and other terrorism supporters are funding our public universities. Plaintiff Jonathan Pelto, a University of Connecticut alum and former elected Connecticut state legislator, is seeking the donor list of his alma mater.  FYI, he’s a liberal Democrat, who was a rising star in Connecticut politics in the early ’90s.

islamiccrescent.jpg

Sunshine is the Best Disinfectant, Though Maybe Not w/ Islam

As you probably know, most public institutions are subject to one or more of various state and federal freedom of information acts, otherwise known as FOIAs.  But the University of Connecticut is trying to circumvent those rules, claiming that its donor list is proprietary information and a “trade secret.”  The university claims that if its donors’ identities are made public, other organizations and entities will try to poach the list.  That’s nonsense, especially in the information age and a world where the wealthiest individuals and donors are well known to most fundraisers.

Plus, most donors to universities have particular motivations–such as having graduated from a particular donee institution . . . or an agenda, such as Saudi billionaire and Palestinian terrorism telethon donor Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal, who’s endowed many a Middle Eastern Studies chair and/or department at several American universities.  And therein lies the danger of keeping donors’ identities secret.  We have a right to know who is giving money to tax-funded, public universities .  .  . and who is trying to shape what is being taught and how.  If the Saudis or, perhaps even HAMAS itself, is trying to pay off universities to get professors to teach students what and how to think about the Middle East, we need to know that.  And if that money is going to a public university, we have a right to know that.

There is also the danger that Communists, such as the Chinese, could secretly fund university engineering departments, for instance, in order to get their hands on important technology.  There are already allegations that the Chi-Coms have been easily obtaining such information from the University of Michigan.  Remember, at issue here is a public university, not a private one.  And we know the Saudis (including the prince) and others are already contributing gobs of money to both private and public institutions of higher learning. I wonder how much they’ve given to U-Conn. When someone goes to court to keep information a secret, you wonder what they are hiding.

It’s trite but true:  sunshine–including information obtained from FOIA requests–is always the best disinfectant.  If we’re not allowed to obtain this information, we won’t know who is infecting our public institutions. On the other hand, one could argue that even sunshine hasn’t been very successful against Islam, as America and the rest of the West continues to turn a blind eye to all of the information it’s seen and learned about Islam even recently, including 3,000 Americans murdered in cold blood, the Shoe Bomber, the Fort Hood massacre, the Undiebomber, the Times Square Bomber, all of the Saudi and other Islamic money thrown around America, etc. None of that info has made a dent. Still, it’s important the information is out there and available.

With regard to U-Conn, the university already won the latest battle to keep its donors’ info private.  Let’s hope Connecticut’s appellate court reverses that unfortunate decision.  Just like campaign contributions to those running for office, we should be able to see who is contributing to the salaries of people like pan-Islamist Juan Cole at the University of Michigan.  I’d bet there are plenty like him at Connecticut.  It’s just as important to see who is influencing those who propagandize America’s future generations in the name of “education” as it is to see who is financing America’s lawmakers.

And it’s not just foreign donors that should bother us.  If some wealthy conservative or allegedly anti-jihadist, pro-Israel American is donating to a place like the University of Michigan–which willingly hosted Islamic terrorist Sami Al-Arian and, for a long time, refused to give credit to students studying abroad in Israel–I want to know who that individual is and try to hold that person accountable.  In this case, Pelto leads a University of Connecticut watchdog group and wants to be able to communicate with U-Conn donors about malfeasance at the university.  If the university were honest, it would admit that it doesn’t want Pelto to communicate this to donors who might not give if they know what’s really going on at the place.  It really has nothing to do with trade secrets and poaching of donors.  That’s just baloney.

Again, this isn’t just a Connecticut case.  All public universities and other institutions are carefully watching this case.  If the University of Connecticut is ultimately victorious, you can expect every public institution to shut down the free flow of information regarding donors. . .  and you can expect the free flow of Muslim and Chi-Com dollars to run rampant at our public universities and colleges.  Although some state FOIA laws differ, most have the same language as Connecticut’s law, as they are all based on the same model laws.

And public universities nationwide aren’t just watching the case, they’re rooting for Connecticut to win its fight to keep this information secret.  Isn’t it interesting how colleges and universities–the places that willingly host Islamic terrorism supporters in the name of “the free and open exchange of information and ideas”–are suddenly so opposed to the free and open exchange of information?

The minute the sunshine is blocked out, these places will become even more infected.  Bet on it.

Read more at www.debbieschlussel.com
 

VIDEO: Muslim Nazis Attack Tunis Synagogue – “Mohammed’s Army’s Coming for You!

Amplify’d from www.debbieschlussel.com

Anyone who doesn’t believe that Muslims are the contemporary Nazis is simply living inside a mushroom.  But, despite this video below of thousands of Muslims attacking a Tunisian Synagogue, the Great Synagogue of Tunis, on Friday, and shouting, “Jews, the Army of Mohammed is coming for you!” and “allah is the greatest!” I know my fellow co-religionist Muslim tuchus-lickers will continue to pander to Muslims all over the U.S.  Because, hey, a “religion of peace” always attacks synagogues and tells its inhabitants that an army of a war-monger mass-murderer is coming for them, right?  Yeah, that’s the definition of peace . . . according to Caligula and utter morons with their heads in the sand during modern-day Kristallnacht.  Jews in Tunisia–the few who are left–are frightened for their lives.  As well they should be. This is the “Religion of Peace” . . . AND Kristallnacht Sequels.

The statement they are shouting is that the “army of Mohammed is returning” and to “remember Khaybar,” which is the city from which Mohammed expelled the Jews who were left, after the rest were massacred by Muslims in the 7th Century.

The handwriting isn’t just on the wall. It’s inscribed in stone in Arabic and blaring from the mosques, the Muslim schools, the streets of Dearbornistan–not just in Tunis, where Yasser Arafat was the welcome guest for years. The fact that the Great Synagogue of Tunis was set on fire at the end of January and its holy books burned by MUSLIMS, won’t make a difference to the Jews of the West who see Judaism through the lens of how many shawarmeh-farting asses they can kiss.

THIS. IS. ISLAM. Period.

That Was Then . . .

swastika.jpgyellowstar.jpg

This Is Now . . .

islamiccrescent.jpgyellowstar.jpg

Read more at www.debbieschlussel.com
 

The Dark Origins Of Valentine's Day



The Dark Origins Of Valentine's Day




Largest planet in the solar system about to be discovered - and it's up to four times the size of Jupiter

Amplify’d from www.dailymail.co.uk

Largest planet in the solar system could be about to be  discovered - and it's up to four times the size of Jupiter

Scientists believe they may have found a new planet in the far reaches of the solar system, up to four times the mass of Jupiter.

Its orbit would be thousands of times further from the Sun than the Earth's - which could explain why it has so far remained undiscovered.

Data which could prove the existence of Tyche, a gas giant in the outer Oort Cloud, is set to be released later this year - although some believe proof has already been garnered by Nasa with its pace telescope, Wise, and is waiting to be pored over.

A new world? Astronomers believe a huge gas giant may be within the remote Oort Cloud region

A new world? Astronomers believe a huge gas giant may be within the remote Oort Cloud region

Prof Daniel Whitmire from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette believes the data may prove Tyche's existence within two years.

He told the Independent: 'If it does, [fellow astrophysicist Prof John Matese] and I will be doing cartwheels. And that's not easy at our age.'

He added he believes it will mainly be made of hydrogen and helium, with an atmosphere like Jupiter's, with spots and rings and clouds, adding: 'You'd also expect it to have moons. All the outer planets have them.'

He believes the planet is so huge, it will ahve a raised temperature left from its formation that will make it far higher than others, such as Pluto, at -73C, as 'it takes an object this size a long time to cool off'.

Isolated: The Oort Cloud, where Tyche is believed to be, is a sphere with a radius of one light year

Isolated: The Oort Cloud, where Tyche is believed to be, is a sphere with a radius of one light year

He and Prof Matese first suggested Tyche existed because of the angle comets were arriving, with a fifth of the expected number since 1898 entering higher than expected.

However, Tyche - if it exists - should also dislodge comets closer to home, from the  inner Oort Cloud, but they have not been seen.

If confirmed, the status and name of the new planet - which would become the ninth and potentially the largest - would then have to be agreed by the International Astronomical Union.

Currently named Tyche, from the Greek goddess that governed the destiny of a city, its name may have to change, as it originated from a theory which has now been largely abandoned.

Explore more:

Read more at www.dailymail.co.uk
 

Doth protest too much?

Amplify’d from www.americamagazine.org
Michael O'Loughlin

Is protesting outside a place of worship an acceptable way to express yourself?

I've been considering this question today after reading the news of a group in Chicago marched in front of Holy Name Cathedral over protesters the weekend to make Cardinal Francis George aware that they disapprove of his campaign against same-sex civil union legislation in Illinois. The Chicago Tribune reports that about 60 people marched in front of the cathedral in between Masses, holding rainbow flags and signs of support for gay and lesbian Catholics. They were met by counter demonstrators with signs opposing same-sex marriage. In a statement, Cardinal George, the former president of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, acknowledged the emotional intensity on both sides of the issue, but said that the demonstrations were inappropriate:



“No matter the issue, Catholics should be able to worship in peace, without fear of harassment,” he continued. “An open display of prejudice against the Catholic Church because of resentment of Church teachings prejudices civil discourse in our society.”

Would it would be reasonable for gay rights activists to claim the inverse, that the bishops' involvement in civil marriage debates is a display of prejudice by the church against a group of people in civil society? If so, is a protest in front of the Cardinal's church legitimate?

These types of protests aren't limited to progressive or liberal causes.

Each year in Washington, DC, the Red Mass at the Cathedral of Saint Matthew the Apostle attracts several Supreme Court justices and other government officials, who are greeted by loud and graphic anti-abortion protesters. In this case, the individuals are protesting to gain the attention of worshipers and not church leaders, but the situation is similar: protesters gather to offer their voice to a heated societal debate.

There are certain laws designed to prevent the disruption of religious services, but the types of protests described above don't seem to violate them. So assuming that they are legally protected expressions of speech, are they appropriate? If church leaders involve themselves in emotionally charged political and social issues, is this a valid response by ordinary people? Perhaps these protests are like meeting someone in person whom you have criticized behind the protective shield of a computer screen, now standing in front of you, a bit too close for comfort? There are no easy answers to these questions, but Cardinal George is correct: people are entitled to worship where they want, when they want, without fear of intimidation or harassment. But what is less clear is if church leaders can release powerful statements and lead massive campaigns for and against certain issues without expecting this sort of display.
Read more at www.americamagazine.org
 

Suspend Statute of Limitations on Sex Abuse?

Amplify’d from www.americamagazine.org
Kevin Clarke

Commenting on the legacy of coverup and abuse emerging out of the mess in Philadelphia, The New York Times calls for a suspension of the statue of limitations for sex abuse claims. 

These are not the first accusations against the Philadelphia Archdiocese. A blistering grand-jury report in 2005 exposed the abuse of hundreds of children by more than 60 archdiocesan priests, lamenting that the church’s cover-up had succeeded since the statute of limitations made it impossible to prosecute the predators.
The recent grand jury said it had no doubt that the scale of the crimes and the extent of the official cover-up went far beyond the cases of sodomy and rape it documented in horrifying detail. It cited continued institutional weaknesses that allowed such crimes to go undetected or unpunished — an obsession with secrecy, a concern for abusers over victims, the inherent conflict in having “victim assistance coordinators” who are supposed to help stricken families but who are church employees with divided loyalties.
The grand jury has implored the current leader of the archdiocese, Cardinal Justin Rigali, to fully cooperate with its investigation and institute reforms, beginning with opening its files on abuse accusations, swiftly removing credibly accused priests from ministry and financing truly independent investigations.
It also urged Pennsylvania to suspend for two years the civil statute of limitations on sexual abuse claims.
States across the country should do the same. There will be no justice or healing until all victims’ voices are heard and the church finally shows true accountability
Read more at www.americamagazine.org
 

New York State Public Health Legal Manual


Austrian Incest Dungeon Used as Party Pad

Amplify’d from gawker.com








Max Read


Austrian Incest Dungeon Used as Party PadAustrian authorities have decided to weld shut the door to the secret cellar where notorious rapist and Two and a Half Men fan Josef Fritzl imprisoned his daughter and their seven children because, well, "teenagers have been partying in his secret dungeon."

The Daily Mail says it's now littered with "old computers, smashed up chairs, a mattress, drug paraphernalia, smashed alcohol bottles and soiled clothes," which, yes, sounds like teenagers to me. (Except "old computers"? Is that a "thing" now?) The paper also claims to have spoken with someone who'd been down there:

'The smell is atrocious; there has been no air and mildew covers the walls while the floors have deep puddles in places. It has become somewhat ‘cool' among the young in Amstetten to say you have been down in "the cellar". You don't have to say which one - everyone knows what you mean.

'Rat droppings have intermingled with the stubs of cigarettes and food wrappers. There is no electricity but partygoers have used candles.

'The walls are very thick. You can play music down there and no-one will hear, or see any light.

Well, hmm, this is not really surprising, right? Teenagers always flock to their town or city's "abandoned mental asylum" or "house where this guy murdered his wife," because they are teenagers, and they are gross. It's just that in Amstetten, that particular archetype is fulfilled by "horrible incest cellar dungeon."

Read more at gawker.com
 

You Can Now Download New York’s Official Apocalypse Manual

Amplify’d from gawker.com








Max Read


You Can Now Download New York's Official Apocalypse ManualIt's a well-known fact that someday, all of New York will be reduced to a smoldering, hellish wasteland, a post-apocalyptic desert so bad it will make The Road look like Sex and the City, a badland consisting of the ashes of a once-mighty city felled by war, disease, terror, or Zu'ul. Luckily, we've got an official legal manual!

Yes, the recently-created "Public Health Legal Manual," published by the state courts system, serves "as a guide for judges and lawyers who could face grim questions in another terrorist attack, a major radiological or chemical contamination or a widespread epidemic reports," reports The New York Times. (This is assuming that the judges and lawyers are not consumed by the brain-eating microbes). Grim questions like: How many old people will not get the medicine? And: Can we just shoot anyone we want, or is that, like, not cool, legally?

The idea here is that there's not a lot of precedent when it comes to serious crises, and people might not be super familiar with the laws—and you don't want to get sued for violating someone's rights by breaking into their house to confiscate their Cipro, or whatever. Here's a relevant excerpt:

Unconsolidated Laws §9129 [(1) "in the event of attack," the state civil defense commission may "(a) assume direct operational control of any or all civil defense forces"; (b) order the use of personnel and equipment where needed; (d) "take, use or destroy any and all real or personal property, or any interest therein, necessary or proper for the purposes of civil defense"; and (e) execute any of the civil defense powers and duties of counties or cities]; (2) [in the event of attack, a county or city (a) may compel evacuations (includes "anticipation" of an attack); (b) "shall control all pedestrian and vehicular traffic, transportation and communication facilities and public utilities.

The entire thing is available as a PDF here, but you should download it and print it out now, because when the space-worms come to enslave us there's a good chance you'll have trouble finding a computer with Acrobat Reader. Sadly, it doesn't do much to cover zombie-related eventualities, but that's still a fairly small body of law, so it's silly to assume it would.

[NYT; image via Shutterstock]

Read more at gawker.com
 

‘Minuteman’ Convicted of Murdering Nine-Year-Old

Amplify’d from gawker.com








Max Read


'Minuteman' Convicted of Murdering Nine-Year-OldOn Monday, a jury in Tucson found former beautician Shawna Forde guilty of killing nine-year-old Brisenia Flores and her father Raul in a bizarre paramilitary raid on the Flores home in 2009. Forde, the leader of a group called "Minutemen American Defense," is what you might call an anti-immigration activist, if you include murdering fourth-graders under your definition of "activism"; two years ago, she and two of her fellow "minutemen" burst into the home of the Flores family, apparently looking for drugs that they planned on using to fund their creepy military games, and shot Raul, Brisenia, and Brisineia's mother Gina. Gina survived by playing dead and later testified against Forde.

This probably shouldn't come as a surprise, but Forde sounds like a real piece of work. "I wish I could say I was sorry it happened. I am not sorry on my behalf because I didn't do it," she told The Daily Beast in her only post-conviction interview. "People shouldn't deal drugs if they have kids." It gets crazier:


She described her group, MAD, as a vital militarized outfit with a "coastal alliance" and an "air alliance" and about 13,000 members who aren't "listed anywhere" because their work would be compromised and security would be breached.


That view of MAD contrasts sharply with testimony by Minutemen at the trial, who said only a few people showed up for a Forde-led "op" to round up unauthorized immigrants near Sasabe, Arizona, in 2007. Prosecutors characterized Minutemen as benign old guys who sit on lawn chairs and peer at the border with binoculars in search of migrants.


How surprising, that a person violently obsessed with a perceived threat has a loose grasp on reality. If only she were one of those "benign old guys"—they seem to manage their bizarre persecutory fantasies just fine with lawn chairs and binoculars and a lot of free time.

[TDB; image via AP]

Read more at gawker.com
 

Newt Gingrich thinks too many Americans are being locked up

Amplify’d from www.npr.org

Budget Crunch Forces A New Approach To Prisons

Budget problems are forcing states and the federal government to rethink their approach to prisons. More than 2 million people are incarcerated in the United States, and the cost is getting unbearable.

Even conservatives who describe themselves as tough on crime are starting to call for the release of some inmates. That's in part because the numbers are speaking louder than ever.

States spend about $50 billion a year to house prisoners, and experts say incarceration is the fastest-growing expense in state budgets, except for Medicaid.

Adam Gelb, who studies public safety at the Pew Center on the States, says it's time to change direction, and he has some numbers to make his case.

"It costs 23 times as much to have somebody behind the walls as it does in the community, and I think that disparity is what's becoming compelling," Gelb told a House appropriations panel last week.

Overhauling Corrections

Researchers have been collecting evidence for years about how to cut prison costs and reduce crime rates. James H. Burch II at the U.S. Justice Department says politicians are finally starting to listen.

"The economic situation that we're in is certainly nothing to celebrate," Burch says in an interview. "But at the same time, it has served as an effective catalyst to get people to look at the facts and look at the data and to be more reasonable about the decisions that we're making."

Those decisions are reflected in President Obama's 2012 budget. It includes a plan to save $41 million by releasing well-behaved inmates.

Recently, Burch says, about a dozen states have reached out to the federal government for advice on how to overhaul their corrections policies.

Experts say the key is to evaluate each prisoner and the risk he poses to the community, just like an insurance company would before writing a policy to cover someone's house or car.

Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) says nonviolent criminals — people locked up on drug charges or for writing bad checks — may do much better out in the world than in a cell next to more dangerous inmates.

"You're finding people ... who have been sent into prison for a nonviolent crime who come out very, very violent," Wolf says. "Have you been in the prisons? I mean, they are very, very violent. So you've actually been counterproductive in what you're trying to do."

A Changing Atmosphere

Wolf is not the only prominent conservative to speak out about prisons. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and tax-reform advocate Grover Norquist belong to a new group called Right on Crime. The organization wants to see low-level criminals released, with more oversight in their local communities and more focus on programs cut down on repeat offenders.

Those are ideas that they say have worked and saved money in such places as Hawaii and Texas.

Pat Nolan has been working on those issues for 14 years. He says he's picking up a change in the atmosphere.

"All these conservatives now are saying: 'Gee, we need to rethink this huge spending on crime. We need to hold the bureaucracy accountable for results. We need to reserve prison space for people who are truly dangerous,' " Nolan says. "It's beginning to change the whole political equation on crime."

Current and former prosecutors say they aren't opposed to the idea of corrections reforms. "It just makes sense," says Jim Brady, a former U.S. attorney in Michigan during the Carter administration.

"The cost of the current penal system has just gotten to be too expensive," said Brady, who now practices law at the Dykema law firm. "They're looking at alternative methods in terms of rehabilitation, deterrence and the other factors that you consider in sentencing."

A Warning

Then there's Jim Reams, the Rockingham County, N.H., attorney and president of the National District Attorneys Association.

Reams said that his state dived head first into corrections reforms about six months ago. But he's got a warning: Those reforms haven't worked out quite as the activists promised.

"The problems in New Hampshire have to do with the fact that they didn't fund any system for the maintenance and the monitoring of the people in the community," Reams said. "They just started dumping them out with the predictable results."

That means more crime, said Jim Pasco of the national legislative office of the Fraternal Order of Police.

"If something needs to be done, it needs to be done at the front end, before crimes are committed," Pasco said. "This is a sociological, a societal problem."

Pasco said he's worried about proposals to cut police forces and release more criminals to save money.

"You put together reduced police strength on the street and more potentially violent criminals out there and it's a recipe for disaster," he said.

Pasco said his members are fanning out on Capitol Hill this week, to share their concerns with lawmakers.

Read more at www.npr.org
 

Billy Ray Cyrus: The Devil Destroyed My Daughter and Disney Helped

Amplify’d from gawker.com








Maureen O'Connor


Billy Ray Cyrus: The Devil Destroyed My Daughter and Disney HelpedBilly Ray Cyrus says "there's no doubt" his family is under attack from Satan. LiLo spent Valentine's Day with SamRo. January Jones only feels safe when photographers are near. Tuesday gossip sins.

  • In a trainwreck interview with GQ, Billy Ray Cyrus says "there's no doubt" that his family is under attack from Satan. The devil's instrument of torture: Hannah Montana. "I'll tell you right now, that damn show destroyed my family." Before the Cyruses moved to L.A., they had a group baptism in Tennessee. But the devil attacked as soon as his brood arrived at the Los Angeles city limits, when Miley pointed to a sign: ADOPT-A-HIGHWAY: ATHEISTS UNITED. "A physical sign. It could have easily said 'You will now be attacked by Satan. Entering this industry, you are now on the highway to darkness.'" At the time of the interview Billy Ray hadn't spoken to Miley since her bong-ripping video surfaced: "I'm scared for her. She's got a lot of people around her that's putting her in a great deal of danger." He compares Miley to Kurt Cobain, Michael Jackson, and Anna Nicole Smith, then concludes, "I should have been a better parent. I should have said, 'Enough is enough, it's getting dangerous and somebody's going to get hurt.'" If the Cyrus family erupts into a feud, it could be the bloodiest Hollywood has ever seen, equal parts Spears, Lohan, and Southern Baptist tent revival. [GQ, image via Getty]

  • Speaking of trainwreck former Disney stars, Lindsay Lohan spent Valentine's Day with Samantha Ronson. Don't give her your heart, Lindsay! It will only hurt worse when the California penal system rips you away from her again! [Radar]

  • January Jones doesn't feel safe unless the paparazzi are around: "They wait down the street on either end to see which way I'm going to go. The weird thing about it is, it kind of makes me feel safe. I live alone, and I feel like they're always there, they're always watching. If someone were to come in and rob me—there's photographers. It's like the best security system ever. Maybe I'm that pathetic at this point. But it's a constant presence." Are we sure this isn't a monologue from Jane Krakowski's character on 30 Rock? January has a "thick steel door on her bedroom, a gift from a Navy SEAL friend. 'At night I crank it and my bedroom's a safe room.'" Now it's the set-up for a horror film. [USAToday]

  • Charlie Sheen called into a radio talk show and announced he was "peeing clean. I feel great, man. I feel great. I am here and ready… I'm actually hungry." Good for him, but is the reference to hunger putting anyone else in a drunk David Hasselhoff state of mind? Also, what's with addled alcoholics calling radio talk shows all the time? Shouldn't Charlie have a direct line to Oprah by now? [Star]

  • Meanwhile in the Two and a Half-iverse, the cast and crew of the favorite TV show of Austrian incest monsters are thoroughly pissed because Warner Brothers is canceling four episodes, which means salaries and jobs are getting slashed. [TMZ]

  • Rev. Al Sharpton keeps saying no to Dancing with the Stars, only because he's so talented: "I've got moves. I'd blow 'em out! There would be no chance for anybody to touch me." []

  • Tonya Harding is pregnant! Remember her? The sequin-bedecked ice hobo who hired a guy to whack Nancy Kerrigan in the leg, and make her cry? Yup, that lady's going to be a mom, with her new husband, who is not the guy who helped her destroy poor Nancy Kerrigan's dreams. [People]

  • Katy Perry's mother is desperate for grandchildren. Katy Perry is going to be the most annoying pregnant woman ever. [People]
  • Read more at gawker.com
     

    Congress Cracks Down on Naked TSA Photo Leaks

    Amplify’d from gawker.com








    Jim Newell


    Congress Cracks Down on Naked TSA Photo LeaksAre you worried about those airport security scans of your penis and vagina making it onto the Internet? First of all, don't flatter yourself. But just in case, the Senate voted 98-0 today in favor of an amendment "that would punish anyone who misuses images from full-body security scanners at airports with a $100,000 fine or a year in prison." How hot would a person need to be to make these penalties "worth it"? A 5.5 on the 1-10 scale, or lower?



    Read more at gawker.com
     

    South Dakota Bill Could Legalize Murder of Abortion Providers

    Amplify’d from gawker.com





    South Dakota Bill Could Legalize Murder of Abortion ProvidersKilling a doctor who performs abortions could soon be legal in South Dakota — that is, if a bill passed out of committee in the state House of Representatives on Monday, which makes it a "justifiable homicide" for someone to kill anyone attempting to harm an unborn child, becomes law.

    State Rep. Phil Jensen (R), who introduced the bill, was quick to deny that the law is designed to prevent women from having abortions, telling TPM that it is instead a way to provide "consistency" to South Dakota law, and afford "a greater degree of personhood to an unborn child."

    Kate Sheppard of Mother Jones first reported on Tuesday that HB 1171 would amend the current law to include the following language (bold parts are new):


    Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person while resisting any attempt to murder such person, or to harm the unborn child of such person in a manner and to a degree likely to result in the death of the unborn child, or to commit any felony upon him or her, or upon or in any dwelling house in which such person is.


    Homicide is justifiable if committed by any person in the lawful defense of such person, or of his or her husband, wife, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant, or the unborn child of any such enumerated person, if there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony, or to do some great personal injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished.


    The legislation passed out of committee along party-lines with a vote of 9-3.

    Jensen cited a South Dakota law currently on the books that includes killing "an unborn child" as part of the definition for manslaughter. He told TPM he's "trying to bring some consistency to South Dakota" with this new language.

    He denied that the bill would open the door to killing abortion doctors, since abortion is legal. "This code only deals with illegal acts, which doesn't include abortion," he said.

    "There is a time and a place where you can defend yourself and it may result in the death of someone who's attacking you," Jensen continued.

    As an example, Jensen described a scenario in which an "ex-lover or ex-spouse who doesn't want to pay child support," and so confronts the pregnant woman and "begins to beat on their abdomen and try to abort their baby." This would "give protection for those who come to the aid of a pregnant woman."

    Even though the law already protects people (including, presumably, pregnant women) who commit murder in self-defense, and those who might commit murder while defending someone else, Jensen simply argued: "It protects not only the woman, but also the life of the unborn child."

    Vicki Saporta, the president of the National Abortion Federation, argued to Mother Jones that in practice,"this is not an abstract bill," and could invite "misguided extremist [to invoke] this 'self-defense' statute to justify the murder of a doctor, nurse or volunteer."

    Jensen said the bill will go to a vote Tuesday at 2:30 PM EST.

    Read more at gawker.com
     

    Vanity: Biggest Breasts Record-Holder in Coma After Suicide Attempt

    Amplify’d from gawker.com
    Biggest Breasts Record-Holder in Coma After Suicide Attempt








    Maureen O'Connor


    Biggest Breasts Record-Holder in Coma After Suicide AttemptSheyla Hershey—the dysmorphic damsel who went from having the world's largest breasts to no breasts at all when her KKK-cup implants nearly killed her—is currently in a coma after a deliberate drug overdose last night, her second suicide attempt in two months.

    After her first attempt, Sheyla began raising funds to restore her blimp-like bust: "Once I reclaim my identity as the World's Biggest Boobs I can be a better role model for my daughter. I feel so ugly without my breasts. Without them, I don't know who I am." Her breast augmentation was scheduled for today, according to the Sun's crushingly depressing report. [Sun, image via SheylaHershey.net]

    Previously:

    Read more at gawker.com