ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Is a Catholic College Really Catholic? Is Baylor Really Baptist?

Amplify’d from www.albertmohler.com

Is a Catholic College Really Catholic? Is Baylor Really Baptist?

Manhattan College claims to be a Catholic institution, and the Archdiocese of New York lists the school as a Catholic college. Nevertheless, all this has not impressed the National Labor Relations Board, which recently ruled that the college could not prevent adjunct faculty from unionizing because, as G. Jeffrey MacDonald of Religion News Service reports, “the school’s core purpose isn’t religious enough to trigger a labor law exemption.”

Isn’t religious enough? Manhattan College does not require its faculty to profess Catholicism. Actually, it is unclear just how the school functions as a Catholic institution. As the NLRB found, the college’s “stated purpose does not involve the propagation of a religious faith, teachers are not required to adhere to or promote religious tenets, (and) a religious order does not exercise control over hiring, firing, or day-to-day operations.”

That finding — that faculty “are not required to adhere to or promote religious tenets” — seems particularly important.

Michael Broyde, a church-state expert at Emory University, told MacDonald, “There are more and more — particularly Catholic institutions — that are broadening their missions profoundly so that you’ll have an institution where neither the students nor the faculty are Catholic.”

Meanwhile, The Baptist Standard reports that the board of regents of Baylor University “voted Feb. 11 to amend the university’s bylaws, allowing members who are active in Christian—but not Baptist—churches to comprise up to 25 percent of the board.” Even as that announcement drew protests from the Baptist General Convention of Texas, the explanation offered by Dary Stone of Dallas, regent chairman, is even more revealing.

As Marv Knox, editor of The Baptist Standard reported: “Changing our governance is in great part an accommodation to obvious demographic changes in church labels and affiliation,” he said. For example, the composition of the freshman class is slightly less than one-third Baptist, and the majority of the overall student body is non-Baptist. I wonder how many Texas Baptists knew that the student body of Baylor reflected such a minority status for Baptists?

The secularization of religious colleges and universities is now an old story, but it does have interesting new developments. Though no one should celebrate a government entity acting to classify colleges according to relative religiosity, the government must be able to detect something legitimately religious about a religious college or university that claims religious exemptions. The bare fact that an institution was founded by a religious group can be totally irrelevant to the way the school now operates. The American landscape is littered with institutions that were once distinctively Christian, but certainly are no longer.

This paragraph from the RNS report is particularly interesting:

Religious colleges are being warned, observers say, to show their core purpose is to “propagate religious faith” or else be treated as a secular enterprise. That could pose a special problem for liberal religious organizations, which seldom require students and faculty to endorse specific creeds or doctrines.

I couldn’t have said it better myself.

G. Jeffrey MacDonald, “Catholic College Faces Crisis of Faith, Labor Laws,” USA Today, Friday, February 11, 2011. Religion News Service release.

Marv Knox, “Baylor Regents Vote to Allow Non-Baptists on Governing Board,” The Baptist Standard, Friday, February 11, 2011.

Read more at www.albertmohler.com
 

Adultery Incorporated — The Infidelity Industry

Amplify’d from www.albertmohler.com

Adultery Incorporated — The Infidelity Industry

It seems that many human beings will abandon their moral principles when faced with the opportunity to commit adultery. Ashley Madison exists to create even more of those opportunities.


“Monogamy, in my opinion, is a failed experiment.” That is the declaration of Noel Biderman, a Toronto businessman who wants to sell you an adulterous affair. As the current cover story of Bloomberg Businessweek reveals, Mr. Biderman is doing a great deal of business.

The magazine describes AshleyMadison.com as “the premier ‘dating’ website for aspiring adulterers.” Biderman says he came up with the idea after serving as an agent for professional athletes. That job required him to negotiate around the adulterous affairs of his clients. Biderman came to the conclusion that adultery could be big business.

Now, Ashley Madison grosses $60 million in yearly revenue and produces $20 million in annual profits. Biderman himself is making millions of dollars a year, and adultery appears to be a growth industry.

The idea behind Ashley Madison is easy enough to understand. Biderman’s plan was to create a website that would appear to cater to women seeking an adulterous partner, while actually attracting men seeking the women for an adulterous liaison. Clients of the site establish a personal profile, check off their “availability status,” and mark their personal preferences. The real money flows to the site when men connect online with women and then have to pay rather steep fees for the privilege of continuing the conversation. If all goes according to plan, adultery soon follows.

Businessweek’s reporter, Sheelah Kolhatkar, describes Noel Biderman as “a lone genius — possibly evil and certainly entrepreneurial.” He serves as chief executive officer of Avid Life Media, the parent company for Ashley Madison. He is also the married father of two young children. In his office the computer monitor flashes his company’s promotional message: “Life is short. Have an affair.”

Biderman’s wife, Amanda, seems unconcerned about both the business and her husband’s chosen role as the captain of the adultery industry. In a statement of almost complete moral evasion, she says: “Really, the business itself doesn’t match who he is as a person — it’s not our lifestyle or value system or any of that.” Well, here’s a clue: if you conceive, establish, and run the business, it is your value system. When “Life is short. Have an affair.” is your motto, adultery is “who you are as a person,” even if you never have an actual affair.

She went on: “I mean, yeah, I’d love it if he were working on a cure for cancer. But it’s a business, and that’s how we look at it.”

The same could be said for a house of prostitution, of course, and at least some observers suggest that prostitution is basically what Ashley Madison is all about. After all, though almost all of the men registered at the site are married, about 20 percent of the women are not.

Interestingly, since adultery has now been transformed into a major business, certain metrics become available. Reporter Sheelah Kolhatkar explains that 20-40 percent of heterosexual married men and 20-25 percent of heterosexual married women will have an affair during their lifetime. She cites University of New Hampshire economist Bruce Elmslie, who claims that men and women commit adultery at about the same rates until the ages of 35 or 40. After that, women are more reluctant to have an affair, and the men surge on.

Biderman explains that women are most likely to have an affair in the workplace with a “work husband” or with the husband of a friend. Men commit adultery under a far wider range of circumstances. Ashley Madison is “drowning in husbands,” Biderman reports.

Biderman launched the site in 2010, but he founded the company back in 2002. He named it Ashley Madison by combining the two most popular names for baby girls that year. He claims just to be meeting a need and rejects the idea that he is actually expanding the numbers of affairs. Nevertheless, anthropologist Helen Fisher accuses Biderman of “preying on human frailty.”

At least in economic terms, Biderman’s idea is paying handsomely. Ashley Madison has already made him a millionaire several times over. David Evans, publisher of Online Dating Insider, remarked that Biderman and his company “certainly own that cheaters’ market.” He added, “It’s quite lucrative and successful.”

Amazingly enough, Biderman actually complains that his business is the target of discrimination. After all, Fox turned down his proposed Super Bowl commercial. As a matter of fact, Biderman seems to complain rather constantly about the opposition his company engenders. On the other hand, some suspect that he is also fueling the opposition, stirring up his own publicity.

Sheelah Kolhatkar describes the company in these terms:

What Ashley Madison does is legal. It’s also illicit, in that it helps users violate their marriage vows and engage in deception and secrecy. This presents enormous branding challenges as well as financial ones: How many fund managers want to go home to their wives and announce, “Honey, I found the perfect investment opportunity!

It is hard to imagine how this company and its founder would not face “enormous branding challenges.” With understatement, Kolhatkar expresses the obvious: “He is running a budding empire built on an activity that most people would say is wrong.”

That last statement is revealing in more than one sense. It does seem that most people believe that adultery is wrong. Even so, it is rampant. It seems that many human beings will abandon their moral principles when faced with the opportunity to commit adultery. Ashley Madison exists to create even more of those opportunities.

It undoubtedly says a great deal that Bloomberg Businessweek chose this topic for its Valentine’s Day cover story. Why did they run a cover article on a man who declares, “Monogamy, in my opinion, is a failed experiment”? Does this represent the magazine’s agreement with Mrs. Biderman when she says, “…it’s a business, and that’s how we look at it”?

I am always glad to hear from readers. Write me at mail@albertmohler.com. Follow regular updates on Twitter at www.twitter.com/AlbertMohler.

Sheelah Kolhatkar, “Cheating, Incorporated.” Bloomberg Businessweek, February 10, 2011. [Warning, the article contains sexually explicit language.]

Read more at www.albertmohler.com
 

Crazy Lady Gets Naked Thanks God After Car Crash in Philly 2011

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com





Crazy Lady Gets Naked Thanks God After Car Crash in Philly 2011


See more at www.youtube.com
 

A Ugandan Witch Doctor’s Crazy Cure for Gayness

Amplify’d from gawker.com
A Ugandan Witch Doctor’s Crazy Cure for Gayness








Brian Moylan


A Ugandan Witch Doctor's Crazy Cure for GaynessGay British radio host Scott Mills visited a Ugandan witch doctor for a television special called The World's Worst Place to Be Gay. The doctor's cure consisted of stripping Mills to the waist, beating him with a live chicken, placing a torch over his head, and then pouring water over it. Congrats, he's no longer gay!

The doctor also offered to transfer his spirit to a cow so that the gayness would be in the animal and not in Mills. Here in the U.S. they might lock you in a church and make you pray the gay away. Being beaten with a live chicken is way worse.

[Image via Shutterstock]

Read more at gawker.com
 

Serene Branson’s Greatest Enemy Has Achieved God-Like Powers Like Bruce Almighty - Evan's Unique Broadcast

Serene Branson’s Greatest Enemy Has Achieved God-Like Powers



John Cook — Serene Branson's Greatest Enemy Has Achieved God-Like Powers Serene Branson, the reporter for L.A.'s CBS affiliate who rather scarily descended into gibberish during Grammy coverage last night, did not have an on-air stroke. According to the New York Daily News, she wasn't hospitalized, is "feeling fine this morning," and was given the OK by paramedics at the scene after inexplicably speaking in tongues during a live shot. CBS isn't feeling so great about things though: It's started systematically trying to remove clips of the glitch from YouTube, citing copyright infringement.



But if Branson didn't suffer some sort of medical emergency, there's only one explanation: Someone at the station is jealous of her. And that someone was recently granted total dominion over all the universe by its Creator, Morgan Freeman, and last night mischievously decided to use that power to humiliate Branson. Wouldn't be the first time.

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com




1 day ago

|

From the Los Angeles CBS affiliate immediately following the G...
From the Los Angeles CBS affiliate immediately following the Grammys. Serene? We can't understand anything you are saying, please help us translate.




by jonkrisel




1 week ago

|

Bruce Almighty is a 2003 American comedy film directed by dire...
Bruce Almighty is a 2003 American comedy film directed by directed by Tom Shadyac. Starring Jim Carrey, Morgan Freeman, Jennifer Aniston, Philip Baker Hall, Catherine Bell, ... and Steve Carell as Evan Baxter




by adhysuryadi1
Read more at www.youtube.com
 

Grammy Wrap Up Show CBS 2 Epic Fail!!!

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com





Grammy Wrap Up Show CBS 2 Epic Fail!!!


See more at www.youtube.com
 

CBS - Serene Branson's Word Salad Grammy Intro FUNNY AS HELL!!!

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com

CBS - Serene Branson's Word Salad Grammy Intro
See more at www.youtube.com
 

Serene Branson’s Greatest Enemy Has Achieved God-Like Powers

Amplify’d from gawker.com
Serene Branson’s Greatest Enemy Has Achieved God-Like Powers








John Cook


Serene Branson's Greatest Enemy Has Achieved God-Like Powers Serene Branson, the reporter for L.A.'s CBS affiliate who rather scarily descended into gibberish during Grammy coverage last night, did not have an on-air stroke. According to the New York Daily News, she wasn't hospitalized, is "feeling fine this morning," and was given the OK by paramedics at the scene after inexplicably speaking in tongues during a live shot. CBS isn't feeling so great about things though: It's started systematically trying to remove clips of the glitch from YouTube, citing copyright infringement.

Serene Branson's Greatest Enemy Has Achieved God-Like Powers But if Branson didn't suffer some sort of medical emergency, there's only one explanation: Someone at the station is jealous of her. And that someone was recently granted total dominion over all the universe by its Creator, Morgan Freeman, and last night mischievously decided to use that power to humiliate Branson. Wouldn't be the first time.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Wild Oats Markets Founder Busted in Child Prostitution Sting

Amplify’d from gawker.com
Wild Oats Markets Founder Busted in Child Prostitution Sting








Max Read


Wild Oats Markets Founder Busted in Child Prostitution StingMichael Gilliland, the founder of onetime Whole Foods rival Wild Oats, was arrested in Phoenix, Ariz. for allegedly "soliciting sex online from a girl who identified herself as a minor." According to police, Gilliland agreed to pay for sex with an underage girl (who, one presumes, was actually an FBI agent) and arranged a hotel-room rendezvous; eight men in total were arrested in the same sting.

Gilliland has since resigned his position as CEO of Sunflower Farmers Market, a chain of organic food stores in the Southwest ("Serious food... Silly prices!"). According to acting CEO Chris Sherrell, Gilliland "believes he is not guilty of the charges brought against him." Wild Oats, which you may remember as the crunchier version of Whole Foods, was bought by Whole Foods in 2007.

[CNN]

Read more at gawker.com
 

Text Message Typo Leads to Murder

Amplify’d from gawker.com
Text Message Typo Leads to Murder








Max Read


Text Message Typo Leads to MurderNeil Brook, a 33-year-old currently on trial for murder in Manchester, England, says that he was forced to stab his neighbor Josef Witkowski to death over a misspelled text message. Yes, I know! Here is Brook's version of events:


  • 1. Brook sends Witkowski an SMS containing the word "mutter." The phone's predictive text software changes it to "nutter."

  • 2. Enraged by the text, Witkowski sends "a series of increasingly abusive messages" to Brook.

  • 3. Witkowski comes to Brook's home wielding a knife.

  • 4. But! Brook had, "in advance of [Witkowski's] visit... taped two large knives around his flat—on the door and near his bathroom."

  • 5. Brook stabs Witkowski to death.

So, yes, this is perhaps not the most likely scenario in the world, given that, for example, what possible text message containing the word "mutter" would then be transformed into an insult if it were changed to "nutter"? But, on the other hand, fucking autocorrect, am I right? So, who knows.

[Daily Mail; image via Shutterstock]

Read more at gawker.com
 

Navy Man Arrested for Child Porn

Amplify’d from gawker.com
4Chan Navy Man Arrested for Child Porn








Maureen O'Connor


4Chan Navy Man Arrested for Child PornCollin Campbell, a Machinist's Mate 2nd Class in the Navy, is under house arrest after a fellow Navy guy borrowed his iPhone and discovered a bunch of kiddy porn in a folder labeled (drumroll) "porn."

The NCIS investigated (still kind of surprised they actually exist outside of the TV show) and said Campbell "admitted to downloading between 10-20 images of child pornography and alleged he obtained all those images from the website www.4chan.org," including images of children as young as "four or five" having sex with adults. If Campbell really got the images on 4chan, then his is the second 4chan-related arrest this month. If found guilty, Campbell faces up to 20 years in prison for the iPhone pictures as well as a cache of 115 more instances of child pornography discovered on his laptop computer. [TSG]

Read more at gawker.com
 

Making Sense Of Media

Just a reminder of our up coming meeting: Making sense of Media.

This will be a RARE opportunity to have representatives from Radio, TV and Newspaper available to you to ask questions on what you want to know about each of media venues. Some questions may include?



- How are stories chosen?

- What is the real difference between "opinion" and "factual"stories?

- Is the media "biased" and what does that really mean?

- How is "journalistic integrity" maintained?

- Who/how is "fact checking" done on stories?

- How are errors in corrected?

- Is it really all about "making money" when stories are chosen?



GARY SUTTON from 910 WSBA radio, SCOTT FISHER from the York Daily Record, PAUL QUINN from WGAL Channel 8 News and LORI GOODLIN from the York Dispatch will be there to answer your questions as well as discuss common misconceptions by the public by their own industries.



When: Tuesday Feb. 22nd

Meeting Time: 7:00pm-8:30pm

Place: Lighthouse Fellowship and Christian School 147 1st Ave, Red Lion Pennsylvania (Parking is in the back of the Church)



Remember, most of the parking is in the back of the Church.The link to the map showing this is below.



http://www.facebook.com/l/2f19cHv1KaOhaMCeoluQaYobCZg;tinyurl.com/4cqxr3o



Light refreshments will be served.



As continued focus on charity, we will be accepting donations for the church to assist with their local out reach programs to the community. Any contributions would be greatly appreciated as well as a way to say "Thank You" to the church for allowing us to hold our meeting there.



Will see you then :-)



Kind Regards,



Anita Marchesani Co-Founder

Lia Allen Co-Founder

Marie Hess Co-Founder

'No More Red Ink' campaign: 'Obamacare can be killed without single Democrat vote'

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

'Obamacare can be killed without single Democrat vote'

'No More Red Ink' campaign: Freezing debt limit deprives Washington of funds


© 2011 WorldNetDaily

WASHINGTON – While House Republicans are working hard on legislation to deprive Barack Obama of the money he needs to implement his massive health-care program, there is a way they can accomplish the same ends without a single Democrat vote and no approval by the Senate or White House, says the organizer of the "No More Red Ink" campaign.

"It's just this simple," says Joseph Farah of WND and the campaign targeting House Republicans alone to freeze the debt limit. "Republicans alone can do this. They are holding all the cards. They simply need to vote no as a bloc on raising the debt limit. At that point, the funding to implement 'Obamacare' dries up on the vine."

The campaign has already delivered 250,000 "red ink" letters to 242 House Republicans, encouraging them to defy their leadership and bring government spending and borrowing under control this year.

"Most people have still not figured out just how much power the Republicans have on this issue with control of just the House of Representatives," said Farah. "For some reason, House Republican leadership is determined to defy popular will and the better instincts of its own caucus to continue business-as-usual spending and borrowing in Washington. But this campaign is making a difference."

Two weeks ago, the organizer of the long-shot campaign to freeze the federal government's debt limit was not optimistic about his chances to create the biggest political earthquake to hit the nation's Capitol since Ronald Reagan's election as president.

Today, he's jubilant about what he sees as a political "tidal shift" within the House Republican majority.

The difference?

"The latest poll from Investors Business Daily shows 70 percent of Americans opposed to raising the debt limit," says Farah. "Among Republicans, it's 86 percent opposed. Among Democrats, it's 55 percent."

And that's just the beginning, says Farah.

His campaign has managed to ship 250,000 messages to House Republicans who wield the power to accomplish this mission without any help from Democrats or the consent of the Senate or Barack Obama. That's during a two-week period in which there was virtually no media coverage of the campaign or even a hint that House Republicans were taking the protest seriously.

That has all changed, he says.

"This campaign is now getting help from tea party activists across the country," he said. "We're getting lots of support from Republicans in the House who don't approve of their leadership's concession on this issue. This is about to explode on the nation as the most important vote Congress will hold this year or any year – one that can completely break the chain of business as usual in Washington."

House Speaker John Boehner is still ignoring legislation introduced to forgo an increase in the debt limit as well as the campaign promises of 87 House Republican freshmen to stop further borrowing by the federal government, says the organizer of a campaign to freeze the debt limit at $14.3 trillion. But the pressure on him is growing, Farah says.

"There's a real division brewing between the House Republican leadership and most of the rest of the 242 members," said Farah, the force behind the "No More Red Ink" campaign that has catapulted the issue to the front burner in the Capitol. "We are getting their attention."

The "No More Red Ink" campaign demands House Republicans stop all deficit spending this year by freezing the debt limit at $14.3 trillion and forcing major cuts in so-called "entitlements" and all non-essential spending.

The growing controversy within the House Republican majority about the debt limit is being called Boehner's defining moment as speaker. And with 70 percent public opposition to "his go-along-to-get-along notion," Farah says Americans have a real chance of ending business as usual in Washington.

"I honestly feel like we are winning the biggest congressional battle of the decade – bigger even than health care, because freezing the debt limit will deprive Obama of the funds he needs to implement his socialist nightmare on the country," says Farah.

Boehner repeatedly has signaled to Barack Obama's administration that he intends to play ball and raise the limit – even explaining in one media appearance that refusal to do so would cause the U.S. to default on its obligations.

But the House Republican Study Committee, whose membership represents two-thirds of the Republican majority, is pushing a bill that would forestall a vote to raise the debt limit, authorizing the Treasury Department to prioritize debt payments when the ceiling is reached.

The legislation "assures lenders that their investments in the United States government are entirely safe," said Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., the lead House sponsor. "Congress will still have to deal with the issue of the debt limit. It simply takes a default off the table."

At least a half-dozen House members, including Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Ron Paul of Texas, are outspokenly opposed to raising the debt limit. But the plan is catching on with many more as the avalanche of red paper messages pours into offices of the Republican majority

The campaign bringing attention to the debt limit vote – and particularly the House Republicans' critical role in that vote – is an effort called "No More Red Ink." Farah has repeatedly pointed out that Republicans were swept into power in November with the expectation they would stand up to more deficit spending.

The campaign got an unexpected boost from Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner recently when he said an unexpected increase in tax revenues has postponed the necessity of such a vote because the debt limit is not expected to be reached until May 16, rather than earlier projections of the end of March.

"This is a gift for all those who understand what's at stake in this vote," said Farah. "We now may have a little more time to make our case with House Republicans, who can unilaterally deny Obama any more wild spending plans and actually force Washington into making dramatic cuts in so-called 'entitlements' and other wealth- redistribution schemes."

"Unfortunately, if the House Republicans do not hear from the American people in strength, they will vote for business-as-usual deficit spending for the next two years and surrender the power they have to force fiscal responsibility on Barack Obama and the Democrats in the Senate," says Farah. "House Speaker John Boehner says he wants to use the debt limit to wrangle concessions out of the Democrats, but when he signals, as he did last weekend, that Congress must raise the debt limit to keep the government solvent, he has already waved the white flag of surrender on the most important vote to be cast in Congress over the next two years."

With the Republicans holding 242 seats in the House, only 218 votes are needed to freeze the debt limit right where it is.

However, the House Republican leadership says it will trade a hike in the debt limit for a promise by Obama and the Democrats to cut the budget.

"I don't understand this?" says Farah. "If you are holding a winning hand, why fold? Why trade away the power you have to force the first real cuts in the budget and the end of deficit spending for yet another promise that will not be kept?"

For his part, Farah has made it easy for the public to make their voices heard in Washington in a powerful way.

The "No More Red Ink" campaign has two facets:

"This is a plan to separate the real economic conservatives from the pretenders," said Farah. "If you want to reduce the debt that is destroying this country's economy we have a chance right now to slam on the brakes. Once the debt limit is raised, it's back to business as usual."








House Speaker John Boehner

House Speaker John Boehner

Republicans in the House hold all the cards, Farah points out, because of their majority. They don't need a single Democratic vote to side with them to shut down borrowing.

"At that point, Barack Obama can't implement Obamacare," he said. "From that moment onward, there will be no more spending initiatives by Obama for the next two years. There will be no more bailouts, no more 'stimulus' spending. It's all over. In fact, the most significant budget cuts in modern American history will have to be made – and the Republican House will still have to approve them."

Farah says he can't understand why so few conservatives and Republicans are pushing the idea.

"I have to believe that most Americans are simply unaware of what is about to transpire," he said. "Everyone is talking about the debt crisis – even Obama. But no one is talking about the opportunity we have to start reversing it right now. It's always tomorrow, next year, next decade. That is a recipe for an even bigger disaster. Borrowing more is never a solution to a debt problem."

The "No More Red Ink" campaign allows Americans to send a "red ink" letter to every member of the House majority urging them to vote "no" on raising the debt limit. The letters are individually addressed to each member, with guaranteed delivery by Fed Ex for a cost of just $29.99. It would cost an individual more than $100 in postage alone to send the 242 letters with no guaranty of delivery and certainly nowhere near the impact.

A similar campaign organized by WND last year delivered more than 9 million "pink slips" to members of the House and Senate. Farah is hoping a similar response by Americans in the next few weeks will persuade House Republicans to oppose raising the debt limit.

Last week, the Heritage Foundation also responded to the dire warnings from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner that if he doesn't get his way with the debt ceiling, "our soldiers and veterans wouldn't be paid, Social Security checks wouldn't go out."

The analysis by J.D. Foster, the Norman B. Ture senior fellow in the economics of fiscal policy at the Heritage Foundation, calls that warning alarmism.

"If the federal government runs up against the debt limit, then the Treasury has tools to manage cash flow for a time before severe measures will be necessary to align the federal spending set in law with the receipts available to the Treasury," Foster wrote in his report.

"Treasury almost certainly will not default on its publicly issued debt. Nor will Congress imperil the standing of U.S. government debt in the credit markets, risking America's 'full faith and credit,' as the president's chief economic adviser has said," he said.

For his part, Farah is encouraged.

"When we started this campaign two weeks ago, almost no one was talking about freezing the debt limit," he said. "Few Americans understood what a powerful weapon the House Republicans had in their hands. Now the pressure is mounting on those who were elected in November promising an end to business as usual in Washington. That's exactly what the debt-limit vote is all about – whether Washington is going to continue borrowing and overspending or whether new leadership will exert fiscal responsibility beginning this year."

Farah predicts this will soon become the biggest issue in the nation – something that everyone is talking about.

"This is the moment to join this campaign and shake up the Washington borrowing-and-spending machine like it has never been shaken up before," he said. "Remind the Republicans in the House why they were elected to lead."


Previous reports:

Read more at www.wnd.com
 

Oh my! King James Bible says 'Thou shalt commit adultery'

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

Oh my! King James Bible says 'Thou shalt commit adultery'

'Wicked' version among ancient Scriptures dating back 600 years

MUCH ABOUT HISTORY

By Joe Kovacs




© 2011 WorldNetDaily


HOBE SOUND, Fla. – Have you ever seen a Holy Bible that actually says, "Thou shalt commit adultery" instead of "Thou shalt not?" Now's your chance.

A collection of rare Bibles, some more than 600 years old dating back to the 14th century is now on display this week at the Hobe Sound Bible College in this South Florida town.

An original page from the King James translation of the Bible from 1611 on display at the Hobe Sound Bible College in South Florida. (WND photo / Joe Kovacs)

Among the collection is the so-called "Wicked Bible" of 1632, which is a King James translation that has a prominent mistake in the Seventh Commandment of the famous Ten Commandments. It wrongly omits the word "not," and shows the instruction as "Thou shalt commit adultery."

Benjamin Crawford of the Bible Heritage Foundation points to the fine print of the Seventh Commandment in the so-called "Wicked Bible" of 1632, which wrongly declares, "Thou shalt commit adultery." (WND photo / Joe Kovacs)

"Regardless of beliefs or background, this exhibition will be fascinating to those who love history and the stories of those who shaped it," said college spokesman Paul Stetler. "These artifacts profoundly impacted the history of the English-speaking world."

Usually kept in a bank vault in Indianapolis, the privately owned collection of 22 items is rarely displayed for public viewing, and the artifacts are all original first editions, with no copies or facsimiles.

This exhibition celebrates the 400th anniversary of the King James translation of the Bible, but there are Bibles on display that pre-date the King James Version by hundreds of years, one by John Wycliffe who began translating the New Testament into English in the early 1380s.

"John Wycliffe was one of the very first to translate the Scriptures from Latin into English," said Stetler. "It's a handwritten manuscript. It's extremely valuable and extremely rare. There are only five of this particular Bible in existence. Three of them are in museums, two of them are in private hands, we get one of them."

Also on display is the Tyndale New Testament from 1536, a translation by William Tyndale, another man to put the ancient text into English. For his efforts to try to get the common man to understand the holy writ, he was put to death by Church officials. Catholics say authorities were merely looking to prevent any private individual from publishing his own translation of Scripture without the approval of the Church.

A page from Acts of the Apostles is displayed from the William Tyndale New Testament of 1536. (WND photo / Joe Kovacs)

The public can also see Thomas Cromwell's Great Bible from 1541, which was commissioned by King Henry VIII when he created the Church of England by separating from the Roman Catholic Church.

Other translations include the Coverdale Bible, the first to be printed in English rather than written by hand, and the Geneva Bible of 1560, which is the first Bible to be divided into chapters and verses, and the version the Puritans favored when they first came to America in the early 17th century.

The Old Testament Book of 1 Kings is displayed from the Geneva Bible of 1560. (WND photo / Joe Kovacs)

Experts in biblical history are on hand to provide mini-lectures about details of the development of the Bible through the centuries, much of which was far from a love-filled endeavor.

"Some of these Bibles were literally paid for by blood," said Stetler. "William Tyndale was burned at the stake for translating the Bible. John Wycliffe was pursued up until his death. They were not able to catch him before he died of natural causes, but they did get their last little dig in by digging up his body and burning his ashes and casting them in the English Channel.

"Of course in those days, in the eyes of the Church, if you were not buried in consecrated ground, that meant that your soul was damned, and so they were trying to damn his soul. That's how strongly they felt about preventing the Bible from being in the hands of the common people. They wanted the Bible to be kept in Latin so that they could maintain their monopoly on truth.

The John Wycliffe Bible, the first handwritten translation from Latin to English dates back to the early 1380s. (WND photo / Joe Kovacs)

"Thank God there were people who were willing to even shed their blood to see that that was changed, to see that we could have the Scriptures in English. Really when you think about it, politically it is significant because it gave birth to the rise of individual freedom that has led to American democracy, and of course spiritually, it is tremendously significant."

During a speech about the history of the Bible this weekend, David Gordeuk, chairman of the ministerial department at Hobe Sound Bible College, said he's continually amazed by the strong sentiments many have when it comes to Scripture.

"Why is it that there was so much and there continues to be so much reaction – in some cases positive and some cases very negative – against the Bible? It's still happening. What is it about it that makes some people so antagonistic?" he asked.

"I would suggest one thing about it is its truth claims. The Bible does claim to be the truth. ... There is power in the Word itself. Thank God for it, and thank God for the preservation."

For Bible junkies, the exhibition has a special bonus. If you've ever wanted to own a piece of an original King James Bible, actually loose-leaf pages from the archaic text are being offered for sale for $250 per page.

Though there's no entrance fee for the event which runs from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Wednesday, donations are accepted to help offset the cost of insurance and security for the ancient documents. Another exhibit with the King James Bibles is planned to take place in Chicago next month.

Read more at www.wnd.com