ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Scientists believe there is a serious chance that dimension portal events will soon be generated by the LHC

Amplify’d from www.theregister.co.uk

Boffins hope for dimensional portal event at LHC by 2013!

Mighty atom-smasher upgrade postponed in excitement

Top boffins at international science alliance CERN have decided to postpone a planned upgrade and keep the Large Hadron Collider - arse-kickingest particle-punisher and largest machine of any kind built by the human race - running at current power levels to the end of 2012.

This decision has been made because scientists believe there is a serious chance that extremely interesting dimension portal events will soon be generated by the colossal matter-mangler.

Supersymmetry event detected at the ATLAS experiment

Simulation of a supersymmetry event imaged by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC.

"With the LHC running so well in 2010, and further improvements in performance expected, there's a real chance that exciting new physics may be within our sights by the end of the year," said CERN's Research Director, Sergio Bertolucci, announcing the decision to keep the Collider running.

"For example, if nature is kind to us and the lightest supersymmetric particle, or the Higgs boson, is within reach of the LHC's current energy, the data we expect to collect by the end of 2012 will put them within our grasp."

Dr Bertolucci has previously briefed the Reg on the intriguing theory of supersymmetry, which suggests that space-time actually has up to ten dimensions rather than the humdrum four we can normally perceive. The eminent boffin explained it to us in 2009 that the LHC might cause a "door" to "an extra dimension" to open up.

"Out of this door might come something, or we might send something through it," Bertolucci told us on that occasion.

Such supersymmetric dimensional portal events could occur as a result of the tremendously violent collisions produced at the LHC, in which pairs of protons or lead ions travelling within a whisker of light speed crash into one another head-on inside the mighty detector caverns situated around the underground particle-beam racetrack outside Geneva.

Supersymmetry-type collisions in which a dimensional portal would open to emit bizarro-stuff known as "sparticles" - or perhaps in which mass or energy could be emitted transversely out of our normal spacetime outwards through the portal - would, however, be extremely rare.

"We need a good understanding of the ordinary collisions so that we can recognise the unusual ones when they happen. Such collisions are rare but can be produced by known physics," explains Dr Oliver Buchmueller, an Imperial College London boffin based at CERN.

"We have already examined some three trillion proton-proton collisions and found 13 '[supersymmetry]-like' ones, around the number that we expected. Although no evidence for sparticles was found, this measurement narrows down the area for the search for dark matter significantly," adds the doc.

Apart from dimensional portals, LHC boffins also hope of course to find the Higgs boson (aka "God Particle") and solve the puzzling issue of dark matter - stuff and things of strange sort, possibly extradimensional, of which there may be a great deal more in the universe than there is regular matter (all the planets, stars, people etc). Some physicists consider that the dark matter may exist in the form of extra-dimensional sparticle stuff, in which case detection of it at the LHC would be a big day for boffinry.

The prospect also exists of finding out where the hell all the antimatter is - theory suggests that equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have resulted from the Big Bang, but these days there's a fair bit of regular matter around and antimatter is vanishingly rare. (Far too rare even to blow up the Vatican, it turns out.)

It had been planned to close down the LHC for a lengthy upgrade at the end of next year, which would allow it to safely be cranked up to its full blast - seven tera-electron-volt (TeV) beams allowing horrendous 14-TeV collisions. At the moment it is limited to 3.5 TeV beams for a maximum particle-prang potential of 7 TeV: the more cautious red line had to be painted on the big dial following a catastrophic electroblast superfluid helium explosion mishap in 2008, which took the great machine out of action for months.

Replacement of the offending copper electrical connections - which might explode leading to similar unpleasantness if the machine is cranked up to full bore - all round the 27km subterranean circuit would be a lengthy task, meaning a year of missed collisions, and physicists think that major revelations may be within their grasp even at the reduced 3.5 TeV cutoff. Hence the postponement: after all, 7 TeV collisions are hugely more powerful than the 1 TeV plinkings produced at the previous most powerful atom-smasher, the USA's Tevatron.

According to CERN, the LHC will fire up following the winter break this month and will keep punching particles until mid-December. Following a short stop over Xmas, as is normal routine, another full year's matter-mangling will take place in 2012.

"If LHC continues to improve in 2011 as it did in 2010, we've got a very exciting year ahead of us," said CERN's top Accelerators and Technology bigwig, Steve Myers. "The signs are that we should be able to increase the data collection rate by at least a factor of three over the course of this year." ®

Bootnote

Readers should note, disappointingly perhaps, that dimensional portals which could be opened by the LHC would be so tiny and exist for such ultra-brief instants of time (10-26 seconds, according to Bertolucci) that they would be unsuitable for any kind of interdimensional invasion and/or travel by humans, parallel-universe Nazis or Romans, dinosaurs, dark nega-deities from the Nth dimension etc.

We did postulate such a portal appearing at the LHC in this April Fools piece, but even for an April Fool we had to suggest that the portal was actually generated by dark-matter beings from the fifth dimension as a response to the LHC, rather than by the machine itself.

Read more at www.theregister.co.uk
 

Catholic Church rules say that babies who die before being baptised can not enter heaven

Amplify’d from www.irishtimes.com

'They buried our baby for £5 and nothing more was said'

For generations, the Catholic Church ruled that babies who died before being baptised could not enter heaven – but were relegated to limbo. They were denied funerals and could not be buried in church graveyards. For the families of these babies, though, the grief lives on, writes
CIAN TRAYNOR 

THERE ARE countless mass infant graves scattered around Ireland, left unmarked, unconsecrated and containing hundreds of bodies.

They are a legacy of Roman Catholic tradition, which stipulated that babies who died before being baptised did not go to heaven, but to an in-between state known as limbo.

Baptism, it decreed, corrected humanity’s original sin in falling away from God. As a consequence, children who died at birth were forbidden to be buried on consecrated ground and denied a funeral service.

Instead they were buried in anonymous plots known as “cillín”. Veiled in secrecy, mired in shame, the burials usually took place in the middle of the night along cemetery boundaries to get the babies as close to sacred ground as possible.

Limbo complicated the grieving process for Eithne Hyland’s stillbirths in 1974, 1977 and 1982, posing insurmountable challenges to her faith.

“When you saw healthy babies growing up, you couldn’t keep your sanity thinking yours were floating around in limbo, as if they were stuck in some maze they couldn’t get out of. That image could torment you,” she says.

A priest said Hyland needed to be “churched” after her first stillbirth, kneeling her down with a hand on her shoulder before saying a prayer to cleanse her.

“I couldn’t understand: why would you need to be cleansed after bringing a life into the world? What has a mother done wrong in giving birth? That still gets me pretty mad. But back then our religion was so staunch that you had to go with what the Church told you.”

Hyland believes the Catholic Church’s attitude towards stillborns was so widely accepted that it made maternity wards unsympathetic places. Parents were not allowed to see or hold a child who died at birth, the logic being that any opportunity for attachment would prolong the grieving.

However, after Hyland’s second stillbirth the sight of her baby, Lisa, left at the end of the bed, tugged at her maternal instinct. “I said, ‘for Heaven’s sake, could you not wrap her up in something?’ The midwife called the student nurse, who came back with a plastic bag and the baby went in with the dirty sheets and everything. I thought, ‘oh my God, did she just throw her out?’” Parents were typically expected to bury the baby themselves. In Dublin, however, the city’s three main maternity hospitals had an arrangement with the non-denominational Glasnevin Cemetery where children were allowed to be buried in mass graves in what was known as the Angels Plot.

After her first stillbirth, Hyland was given the choice of burying her baby or having the hospital take care of it. “Naturally you’re trying to deal with the grief and shock, then suddenly you have to decide what to do. We wanted to protect the rest of the family from the trauma of burying a stillbirth at home but we didn’t know what the procedure was. So they buried our baby, for £5, and nothing more was said.”

Many parents held on to the bill, often framing it, as it was the only memento they had. Custom dictated it was never mentioned it again. “People said, ‘ah sure you’re young enough, you can start again’. After that, you were told to keep it to yourself; otherwise people thought you were looking for sympathy.” It wasn’t until the early 1990s that Hyland “found the courage” to look for her three stillborn babies.

“My husband said: ‘Listen, they’re in your heart. Don’t be puttin’ yourself through that.’ But I had this feeling it wasn’t finished and that it needed to be. To me, an unmarked grave was the real limbo.”

It was through Isands, a charity now known as A Little Lifetime Foundation, that Hyland learned she could trace the burials in Glasnevin Cemetery. They had kept exceptional records; all you needed was a name and date.

Ron Smith-Murphy, the charity’s chairwoman, lost a daughter at birth in 1993, as did her parents 29 years before. Like Hyland, Smith-Murphy didn’t know what her rights were as a mother when she was told her baby would live for minutes. That sense of vulnerability inspired her to establish a supportive framework for parents dealing with a similar loss, both past and present.

She constantly hears accounts of babies being snuck into adult coffins so they could be buried in consecrated ground, or unsympathetic priests telling mothers to bury their baby in the garden.

In many cases, she says, parents tend to return to the child they never got to be with once the rest of their family has been reared. “It’s almost like the grief was delayed because it was suppressed. Often when they’re near death, they talk of the baby they almost had. It’s heartbreaking.”

Change has been gradual. Isands successfully campaigned for a stillbirth register in 1995 and their booklet A Little Lifetime is now distributed to all maternity hospitals, offering parents crucial information and support.

Glasnevin’s Angels Plot, where more than 50,000 babies have been buried, with as many as 70 in each grave, has now been restored to include a memory garden and its annual blessings are well-attended.

“I suppose it’s a change in society, a change in the recognition of grief,” says George McCullough, the cemetery’s chief executive. “When I came here 24 years ago, the remains of babies would arrive at nine in the morning in the under-section of the hearse, with no parents, no ceremony and no recognition. It was an Irish solution to an Irish problem. Now you have 40 fathers, mothers, grandparents and children all with an emotional interest in the one spot for a loss from maybe 30 or 40 years ago.”

In 2007, the International Theological Commission announced there was “hope for the salvation of children who have died without baptism”. Though this upheld the concept of limbo, priests were finally allowed to bless limbo graves and bury the unbaptised in church grounds.

Fr Joe Brophy, who is based in Kiltegan, Co Carlow, says there is nothing about limbo in the scriptures and that it evolved from a climate of control. (St Augustine concluded in the fifth century that infants who die without baptism were consigned to hell.)

“The mind boggles,” he says. “Why would a child born without being baptised [not go to heaven]? It’s gobsmacking arrogance that a pope or someone in authority could say, ‘we’re sorry now but that child is not up to scratch for us’. And that’s really what we were saying. Thank God people have grown up a bit and we don’t take that anymore. It was nonsense.”

Smith-Murphy, and many others, feel the Vatican has not gone far enough. She believes parents of children who died prematurely are owed an apology and has campaigned for a plaque to be erected in every Church-owned cemetery to acknowledge those buried in its hedgerows and ditches.

“There are so many aspects of disrespect to these children and their families. Thankfully, we’re coming to a point where we’re acknowledging what they went through. But for a lot of them, it’s too late. My mum believed she would one day be reunited with her daughter, whereas my dad – a holy man who lived by the book – died believing he would never see her. They never got one shred of recognition from the maternity system, the State system or the Church.”

A Little Lifetime Foundation can be contacted on 01-872 6996 or isands.ie

Donegal's Oilean na Marbh 

Oileán na Marbh (Isle of the Dead) is an island off the west coast of Donegal that was used by locals to bury children who died at birth.


In September 2009, the neighbouring community of Carrickfinn decided to have the island blessed and to erect a commemorative stone to recognise the 1,200-plus children buried there.


“It was always thought that something should be done because after our generation, nobody would know anything about it. It would all be forgotten,” says Seamus Peter Boyle, who led the campaign.


Many present at the ceremony had grown up with the sight of mothers and fathers standing on the piers and gazing across the water, not knowing, as children, that what they were seeing were parents pining for their stillborn babies buried on the island.


For Boyle, now 66, one image in particular has stuck with him: a man leaving for the island in the middle of the night with a spade to bury his twins, whom he carried in a shoebox.


The ceremony was so well-received by the town that they repeated the commemoration last September and hope to continue doing so.


“It was beautiful, so it was,” says Boyle. “There was joy and sadness in it at the same time. Everybody’s just pleased that things have changed. It’s very sad that it was left like it was for so long. It never should have happened that way.”

Read more at www.irishtimes.com
 

Baroness Ashton in political correctness row over word 'Christian' word should be Catholic

Amplify’d from www.telegraph.co.uk

Baroness Ashton in political correctness row over word 'Christian'

Baroness Ashton is under fire after the EU failed to agree on a statement condemning attacks on religious minorities in the Islamic world because it is not politically correct to use the word "Christian".

Baroness Ashton in political correctness row over word 'Christian'



Italy accused Lady Ashton, the EU's foreign minister, of 'excessive' political correctness Photo: EPA



Bruno Waterfield

By Bruno Waterfield, Brussels

5:05PM GMT 01 Feb 2011



A meeting of EU
foreign ministers failed to agree on a condemnation of sectarian attacks
over the Christmas period that targeted Christians in Egypt and Iraq.



Talks ended angrily when Italy accused Lady Ashton, the EU's foreign minister,
of "excessive" political correctness because she refused to name
any specific religious group as a victim of attacks.



Franco Frattini, the Italian foreign minister, demanded an EU response on the
persecution of Christians after a New Year suicide bombing at a Coptic
church in northern Egypt in which 23 people were killed.



The Egyptian bombing followed attacks in Baghdad and fears, expressed by the
Vatican, of persecution leading to a Christian exodus from the Middle East.



Mr Frattini, backed by France, said it pointless to issue statements defending
religious tolerance without any references to the specific minority,
Christians, that was under attack

Related Articles


"This position is an excess of secularism, which is damaging the
credibility of Europe," he said on Monday night. "The final text
didn't include any mention of Christians, as if we were talking of something
else, so I asked the text to be withdrawn."


Diplomats have accused Lady Ashton of appeasing Muslim sensibilities to avoid
a "clash of civilisations" after Egypt reacted furiously to a
request from Pope Benedict XVI for better protection for the country's
Christian minority.


The EU high representative said she would have to "reflect" further
about how to "make sure we recognise individual communities of whatever
religion who find themselves being harassed or worse."


Criticism and diplomatic rumblings over Lady Ashton's performance in the
European foreign minister job are beginning to break into the open after the
launch of her EU diplomatic service in the New Year.


"Those who thought the creation of a high representative would lead to a
more unified and coherent EU foreign policy have been very disappointed with
Ashton," said a diplomat. "She cannot even finesse a statement
from Christian Europe condemning attacks on Christians."

Read more at www.telegraph.co.uk
 

Lawyer for Wis. accuser: Vatican rejected lawsuit

Next time you commit a crime just reject the lawsuit. Who would of thought it is so easy!!!

Amplify’d from www.vcstar.com

Lawyer for Wis. accuser: Vatican rejected lawsuit



  • PATRICK CONDON

MINNEAPOLIS
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) - The attorney for a man who says he was sexually abused decades ago by a now-deceased priest at a Wisconsin school for the deaf says the Vatican has refused to be served with a lawsuit over the matter.

St. Paul attorney Jeff Anderson, who frequently clashes with the Catholic hierarchy over abuse allegations, said Monday that representatives of his office served the lawsuit late last week at the Vatican's office of the Assessor for General Affairs, but that it was returned via Federal Express.

Anderson's client is Terry Kohut, a 61-year-old deaf man from Chicago who alleges the late Rev. Lawrence Murphy molested him for several years starting around 1960 while Murphy worked at a Milwaukee-area school for the deaf. The lawsuit names as defendants the Holy See itself as well as Pope Benedict and two other top cardinals, contending they conspired to keep quiet decades of abuse allegations against Murphy.

Anderson told The Associated Press Monday that the Vatican's decision to reject the suit amounted to "thumbing their nose at the judicial process and rubbing salt in the wounds of abuse survivors." He planned to read a statement from Kohut at a Monday press conference.

Jeffrey Lena, the U.S.-based attorney for the Vatican, said in an e-mail that the lawsuit should have been served through diplomatic channels as would be done with any foreign state. He called Anderson's news conference "grandstanding."

"The foreign state is perfectly within its rights under U.S. law to reject that form of service so that service by diplomatic assistance is employed," Lena wrote.

In October, a U.S. federal judge asked the Vatican to cooperate in the serving of court papers to the Holy See, the pope and two other Vatican officials, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone and Cardinal Angelo Sodano.

The Vatican is not obliged to comply with such requests. But Anderson said doing so would have signaled the Vatican is willing to cooperate in moving the case along.

"It can be done exactly the way we did it and they are the ones choosing to delay it and to drag it out," Anderson said.

Murphy, who died in 1998, has been alleged to have sexually abuse some 200 boys at the deaf school from 1950 to 1974. In 1996, Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert Weakland complained about Murphy in a letter to the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, the powerful Vatican office led by then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger from 1981 until he became pope in 2005.

That office initially ordered Weakland to hold a canonical trial against Murphy in 1997, but later changed course after a letter from Murphy. The Vatican noted Murphy's advanced age, failing health and lack of further allegations.

Kohut himself wrote two letters to Sodano in 1995, reporting he had been abused by Murphy and asking for help.

Anderson has filed several more lawsuits stemming from allegations against Murphy and said he is in talks with numerous other potential accusers. Kohut's lawsuit contends he "continues to suffer great pain of mind and body, shock, emotional distress, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, disgrace, humiliation and loss of enjoyment of life" - as well as years of lost job income and bills for medical and psychological treatment.

The Vatican argues it's not liable for clerical sex-abuse cases under canon law and a church structure that holds bishops - and not Rome - responsible for disciplining pedophile priests.

Plaintiffs in a similar case in Oregon have sued the Vatican using a similar approach. Anderson represents clients in that proceeding as well, and on numerous occasions has expressed a desire to hold prominent Vatican leaders liable for sexual abuse by priests.

Read more at www.vcstar.com
 

Vatican’s US lawyer: Milwaukee sex abuse lawsuit didn’t follow proper channels

Vatican’s US lawyer: Milwaukee sex abuse lawsuit didn’t follow proper channels

St. Paul, Minn., Jan 31, 2011 / 10:50 pm (CNA).- An attorney attempting to sue the Vatican in a sex abuse case failed to follow proper diplomatic channels in his try to serve the lawsuit, the Holy See’s U.S. lawyer says. He charged that the attorney is “grandstanding.”

Jeff Anderson, from St. Paul, Minnesota, represents a deaf man who says he was sexually abused decades ago by Fr. Lawrence Murphy, a now-deceased priest at a Wisconsin school for the deaf. Anderson’s lawsuit charges that Pope Benedict and other Vatican officials conspired to cover up the allegations.

He claimed on Jan. 30 that the Vatican refused to be served with the lawsuit and returned it via Federal Express.

Anderson, who has been involved in many lawsuits against Catholic dioceses in the U.S., scheduled a news conference on Jan. 31 to accuse the Vatican of “dragging out the healing of deaf victims.” He said he plans to ask Archbishop Timothy M. Dolan of New York to bring the case to the Pope’s attention.

Archbishop Dolan is the U.S. bishops’ conference president and former Archbishop of Milwaukee.

Jeffrey Lena, the U.S.-based attorney for the Vatican, said in a Jan. 30 e-mail that the lawsuit should have been served through diplomatic channels as would be done with any foreign state. Holding a news conference on the matter, he told the Associated Press, is “really just a form of grandstanding by Mr. Anderson for the press and the public.”

The Vatican has said that local bishops are responsible for disciplining sexually abusive priests.

comments:

Published by: Norma Smith

Rogers, AR 02/01/2011 02:40 PM EST


Anderson's "dragging out the healing of deaf victims,” can be seen as a 'pure' business ambition. Of course, he is not concerned one bit for the alleged victims. On the other hand, the Catholic Church real concern for all victims of this terrible evil is seen on the constant calling from the Holy Father to repentance and amendment of the perpetrators and his consoling statements to the victims. The hate for the Church of Christ and hunger for money are the worst evils of the present time, God help us!

Published by: fjf

Freehold, NJ, USA 02/01/2011 01:22 PM EST


Jeff Anderson. Need anything more be said?

Published by: John Shuster

Port Orchard, WA USA 02/01/2011 01:04 PM EST


If the Pope and his associates embrace and teach the values of truth and justice, why do they have a lawyer use the legal filter of "diplomatic channels" to keep them from testifying to the same?

Published by: Leon

Eastlake,oh. usa 02/01/2011 12:06 PM EST


Is it Not a Crime to avoid the Law?
Is the current Pope Head of the Church
above the Law?

Published by: Kay Goodnow

Lenexa KS USA 02/01/2011 11:38 AM EST


Just as the "church" blames survivors of priest abuse for their "problems," now that same "church" blames an attorney for filing a case in an inappropriate manner. Is the "vatican" above the law, or does the "Vatican" just believe itself to be immune from charges of criminal like behavior? How can anyone remain attached to a "church" that is a coven for evil? Beats me!

Published by: Bob Schwiderski

Wayzata, MN, USA 02/01/2011 10:44 AM EST


How many "improper" channels did the abusive clerics and enablers sneak around in?

This new spin by Lena and the Vatican to avoid the courts of the USA/Milwaukee is another "improper" sneak thru the channels of truth. Bob Schwiderski
Read more at www.catholicnewsagency.com
 

Who owns the word 'Adventist,' or 'Catholic'? 501 (c)(3) and the Mark of the Beast







Who owns the word 'Adventist,' or 'Catholic'?







Who owns the word 'Adventist,' or 'Catholic'?

By Julia Duin




Do religious groups have the right to sue you if you use their name, logo or so-called branding color?




Maybe so. On Monday, this blog ran a report that mentioned an Adventists for Life Facebook page for Seventh-day Adventists who oppose abortion.




The SDA headquarters, based in Silver Spring, Md., reacted quickly, asking Facebook to remove the offending page. I contacted Facebook on Wednesday to ask why no one checked with the folks behind the page before killing it. I received a copy of their policy that says once someone lodges a plausible claim of trademark infringement, Facebook removes or disables access, no questions asked.




Mark Price, a Canadian SDA'er who was in charge of the page, alerted the 600 members of the group that he'd been silenced. "The Adventists For Life group is not an organization but an informal gathering of Seventh Day Adventists who are pro-life," he wrote me. "I am very concerned, as you are, about this kind of power that the Adventist leadership have to shut people up."




I called SDA spokesman Garrett Caldwell to see what was up. He told me his organization had complained about trademark infringement; that is, the unauthorized use of the SDA brand.

"We are working hard to try to protect the name and organization associated with the name," he said. "Both 'Adventist' and 'SDA' are trademarked and registered names. We want to make sure the use of the name is connected with our organization."




If the originator of the page called SDA headquarters and asked permission to use the SDA name, "We'd say absolutely [yes]," he added.




Hmmmmm. I was sent a copy of a terse cease-and-desist letter written by Andrea Saunders, associate general counsel for the SDA, and there was no mention whatsoever of asking permission. The letter not only wanted the Facebook page renamed, it also wanted its originators to deregister the domain name for www.adventistsforlife.org, which the originators owned but were not using.




Now the page has existed on Facebook for some time. Only now did the SDA go after it. This whole situation brings up an interesting conundrum. What if other religious groups did the same thing? In this age of marketing, brand names and search engine optimization, are words such as "Jewish" or "Mormon" or "Catholic" now trademarks?


If so, someone had better call the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. They've been after the group Catholics for a Free Choice for more than a decade, informing anyone who will listen that CFFC "is an arm of the abortion lobby" and "is not a Catholic organization, does not speak for the Catholic Church, and in fact promotes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church as articulated by the Holy See."


Or how about many Jewish groups, which have resented the group Jews for Jesus ever since its 1973 founding partly because of its name?




Or the word "Mormon"? Surely the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints hasn't appreciated all the ways that word has been used.


Trademarking an ultra-common name, adjective or phrase may sound ridiculous, but look how the Susan G. Komen Foundation has threatened to sue more than numerous charities over the words "for a cure." That is, if you're a group of figure skaters that sponsors an event called "Skate for a Cure" to help fight cancer, you'll hear from the Komen lawyers. They'll also warn you against using the color pink, Komen's trademark hue.


The Lance Armstrong Foundation has taken a similar position with the color yellow, the Wall Street Journal reports.


It's only a matter of time before the world's religions pick up on this trend. The possibilities are endless. An enterprising Islamic group can claim it has exclusive rights to the world 'Muslim' and the color green. Hindus can certainly lay claim to the color saffron.


So the Adventists may be ahead of the times, not behind. They have been defending their name for some time, most notably in 1987, when they sued SDA Kinship, a group of gay Adventists, also charging trademark infringement. US District Judge Mariana Pfaeizer ruled against the church in 1991, saying the group's title did not infringe on the denomination's use of the name.

The SDA did not appeal that ruling, but it's been fighting the unauthorized use of its name ever since.




Should religious denominations be able to sue groups that use their name or logo without permission?




By Julia Duin January 30, 2011; 12:28 PM ET




.












Mark of the Beast: DEI = 501 Internal Revenue Code Exemption Requirements - Section 501(c)(3) Organizations



Mark of the Beast: VICARIUS 112 + DEI 501 + FILII 53 = 666



Revelation 13 (King James Version)



9If any man have an ear, let him hear.



10He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.



11And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.



12And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.



13And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,



14And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.



15And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.



16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:



17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.



18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

Exemption Requirements - Section 501(c)(3) Organizations



To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.



Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are commonly referred to as charitable organizations. Organizations described in section 501(c)(3), other than testing for public safety organizations, are eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions in accordance with Code section 170.



The organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, and no part of a section 501(c)(3) organization's net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. If the organization engages in an excess benefit transaction with a person having substantial influence over the organization, an excise tax may be imposed on the person and any organization managers agreeing to the transaction.



Section 501(c)(3) organizations are restricted in how much political and legislative (lobbying) activities they may conduct. For a detailed discussion, see Political and Lobbying Activities. For more information about lobbying activities by charities, see the article Lobbying Issues; for more information about political activities of charities, see the FY-2002 CPE topic Election Year Issues.





Additional Information

Application Process Step by Step:  Questions and answers that will help an organization determine if it is eligible to apply for recognition of exemption from federal income taxation under IRC section 501(a) and, if so, how to proceed.



Page Last Reviewed or Updated: November 15, 2010



Source: http://inquisitionnews.amplify.com/2011/02/01/mark-of-the-beast-dei-501-internal-revenue-code-exemption-requirements-section-501c3-organizations/






Source: http://inquisitionnews.amplify.com/2011/01/06/re-email-from-andrea-d-saunders-attorney-in-the-office-of-general-counsel-for-the-general-conference-of-seventh/




Needless to say, My Wordpress Blog was closed down because of this!!!






Blaine Bosserman


INQUISITION NEWS



Mark of the Beast: DEI = 501 Internal Revenue Code Exemption Requirements - Section 501(c)(3) Organizations

Mark of the Beast: VICARIUS 112 + DEI 501 + FILII 53 = 666



Revelation 13 (King James Version)



9If any man have an ear, let him hear.



10He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.



11And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.



12And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.



13And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,



14And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.



15And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.



16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:



17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.



18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

Amplify’d from www.irs.gov

Exemption Requirements - Section 501(c)(3) Organizations





To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.



Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are commonly referred to as charitable organizations. Organizations described in section 501(c)(3), other than testing for public safety organizations, are eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions in accordance with Code section 170.



The organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, and no part of a section 501(c)(3) organization's net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. If the organization engages in an excess benefit transaction with a person having substantial influence over the organization, an excise tax may be imposed on the person and any organization managers agreeing to the transaction.



Section 501(c)(3) organizations are restricted in how much political and legislative (lobbying) activities they may conduct. For a detailed discussion, see Political and Lobbying Activities. For more information about lobbying activities by charities, see the article Lobbying Issues; for more information about political activities of charities, see the FY-2002 CPE topic Election Year Issues.



Additional Information




Application Process Step by Step:  Questions and answers that will help an organization determine if it is eligible to apply for recognition of exemption from federal income taxation under IRC section 501(a) and, if so, how to proceed.



Page Last Reviewed or Updated: November 15, 2010
Read more at www.irs.gov
 

Who owns the word 'Adventist,' or 'Catholic'?

Amplify’d from endrtimes.blogspot.com


Who owns the word 'Adventist,' or 'Catholic'?

Who owns the word 'Adventist,' or 'Catholic'?
By Julia Duin

Do religious groups have the right to sue you if you use their name, logo or so-called branding color?

Maybe so. On Monday, this blog ran a report that mentioned an Adventists for Life Facebook page for Seventh-day Adventists who oppose abortion.

The SDA headquarters, based in Silver Spring, Md., reacted quickly, asking Facebook to remove the offending page. I contacted Facebook on Wednesday to ask why no one checked with the folks behind the page before killing it. I received a copy of their policy that says once someone lodges a plausible claim of trademark infringement, Facebook removes or disables access, no questions asked.

Mark Price, a Canadian SDA'er who was in charge of the page, alerted the 600 members of the group that he'd been silenced. "The Adventists For Life group is not an organization but an informal gathering of Seventh Day Adventists who are pro-life," he wrote me. "I am very concerned, as you are, about this kind of power that the Adventist leadership have to shut people up."

I called SDA spokesman Garrett Caldwell to see what was up. He told me his organization had complained about trademark infringement; that is, the unauthorized use of the SDA brand.
"We are working hard to try to protect the name and organization associated with the name," he said. "Both 'Adventist' and 'SDA' are trademarked and registered names. We want to make sure the use of the name is connected with our organization."

If the originator of the page called SDA headquarters and asked permission to use the SDA name, "We'd say absolutely [yes]," he added.

Hmmmmm. I was sent a copy of a terse cease-and-desist letter written by Andrea Saunders, associate general counsel for the SDA, and there was no mention whatsoever of asking permission. The letter not only wanted the Facebook page renamed, it also wanted its originators to deregister the domain name for www.adventistsforlife.org, which the originators owned but were not using.

Now the page has existed on Facebook for some time. Only now did the SDA go after it. This whole situation brings up an interesting conundrum. What if other religious groups did the same thing? In this age of marketing, brand names and search engine optimization, are words such as "Jewish" or "Mormon" or "Catholic" now trademarks?
If so, someone had better call the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. They've been after the group Catholics for a Free Choice for more than a decade, informing anyone who will listen that CFFC "is an arm of the abortion lobby" and "is not a Catholic organization, does not speak for the Catholic Church, and in fact promotes positions contrary to the teaching of the Church as articulated by the Holy See."
Or how about many Jewish groups, which have resented the group Jews for Jesus ever since its 1973 founding partly because of its name?

Or the word "Mormon"? Surely the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints hasn't appreciated all the ways that word has been used.
Trademarking an ultra-common name, adjective or phrase may sound ridiculous, but look how the Susan G. Komen Foundation has threatened to sue more than numerous charities over the words "for a cure." That is, if you're a group of figure skaters that sponsors an event called "Skate for a Cure" to help fight cancer, you'll hear from the Komen lawyers. They'll also warn you against using the color pink, Komen's trademark hue.
The Lance Armstrong Foundation has taken a similar position with the color yellow, the Wall Street Journal reports.
It's only a matter of time before the world's religions pick up on this trend. The possibilities are endless. An enterprising Islamic group can claim it has exclusive rights to the world 'Muslim' and the color green. Hindus can certainly lay claim to the color saffron.
So the Adventists may be ahead of the times, not behind. They have been defending their name for some time, most notably in 1987, when they sued SDA Kinship, a group of gay Adventists, also charging trademark infringement. US District Judge Mariana Pfaeizer ruled against the church in 1991, saying the group's title did not infringe on the denomination's use of the name.
The SDA did not appeal that ruling, but it's been fighting the unauthorized use of its name ever since.

Should religious denominations be able to sue groups that use their name or logo without permission?
Read more at endrtimes.blogspot.com
 

The Prophecy Club The Truth About the Rapture by Stan Johnson