Amplify’d from www.infowars.com

Police trained that FEMA camps are perfectly normal

Milo Nickels Activist Post January 27, 2011

Picture it:  You are sound asleep next to your spouse.  Your children are safely tucked away in their bedrooms.  Despite the chaos in the world which surrounds you–the riots, the food shortages, the deadly pandemic, the nationwide power outage, and the apparent societal collapse–you are safe and comfortable in your house.  Although the world has seemingly gone crazy, you are doing all you can to weather the storm and (for the moment) everything is quiet and peaceful.  Suddenly, there is a loud crash!  You jerk awake from your slumber.  Within seconds, before you can even get to your feet, you are blinded by streams of intense light.  You can hear your spouse screaming, and your children crying in the distance, but all that noise is drowned out by the loud, harshvoices behind those blinding lights.  “Get down!”  “Don’t move!”  If you hesitate for even a second, they will violently throw you to the ground.  You are dragged from your own house along with the rest of your family.  As several officers remain behind to search your house, you are thrown onto a fortified bus without any explanation, and whisked away to a “secure facility”.  This is your new home–uniforms, prisoner numbers, forced vaccinations, ID markings, armed guards, barking guard dogs, and a fence with barbed wire pointing in.

Yes, I’m talking about FEMA camps.  I’m not sure if I actually believe that they exist or not, but I have absolutely no doubt that our government is capable of such a thing.  These are, after all, the same people who want to see all travelers naked–and grope their genitals.  Honestly, how much of a stretch would camps really be?  With all of the rules, laws, taxes, license plate readers, face scanners, traffic cameras, security cameras, metal detectors, speed cameras, and (recently) unmanned spy drones we are pretty much in a giant camp already–they just haven’t built the fence yet.

This article is not about the “reality” of FEMA camps.  Plenty of other people have written articles and made movies which offer “proof” that FEMA camps exist.  If you want information concerning the Japanese internment camps of WWII, legislation that opens the door to prisoner camps, or even maps of supposed FEMA camp locations, may I offer the following resources for you:

Camp FEMA – American Lockdown (full movie – video – 86 minutes) Jesse Ventura – Conspiracy Theory (Season 2, Episode 4 – video – 44 minutes) American Concentration Camps (website) Google maps marked with all alleged FEMA camps (website)

I’ve watched all the movies and visited all the websites.  The information is sometimes compelling, sometimes absurd.  There is a plethora of facts and an abundance of wild speculations.  Although, I’m not sure what I believe, I have acquired an interesting piece of information that I want to share with all of you.  One of my biggest questions concerning FEMA camps has always been this: how on earth would they convince military and police to go along with the roundup?

It’s actually not as difficult as you might suspect.  Think of all the unconstitutional, victimless-crime laws that the police willingly and aggressively enforce every single day.  Take the “seatbelt law” for example.  Although this law is clearly a violation of the constitution and a glaring display of government overstepping its bounds, it was justified to the police as being “necessary because it saves lives”.  The government offers a rationalization, the law gets passed, police supervisors give out the orders, and police do as they are told.

It all starts with the justification/rationalization.

It would stand to reason that, if placing people in camps could be justified/rationalized to the police as a “necessary act to save lives”, the police would likely go along with it.  But are the police actually being indoctrinated that camps may be necessary to save lives?  Sadly, the answer is yes.  I recently received the following email, and it blew me away:

Dear Milo, I love your site.  I noticed you haven’t discussed FEMA camps yet, but here’s some information that you might find interesting.

I’m a police officer in [withheld to protect officer's identity] State. Everyone in my department was recently required to take an online course sponsored by FEMA about the “Incident Command Structure” (ICS). The Incident Command Structure is the system of control set in place following a disaster, catastrophe, terrorist strike, or other such event.  All of the documents from that course can be found on FEMA’s website:

http://training.fema.gov/EMIweb/IS/is100lst.asp

In particular you should pay attention to Unit 6: ICS Facilities. Here’s that direct link:

http://training.fema.gov/EMIweb/IS/ICS100CR/ICS100IG/06ICS100ICSFac_NMSept05.pdf

First, I’d like you to notice page 6-8 which is actually entitled “CAMPS“!!! Now, they claim in this training that “camps” are temporary facilities and may not be required. I feel that they do this to condition the police that camps are perfectly normal and may be necessary–so that we won’t hesitate to place people in camps upon command.

Secondly, I’d like you to notice page 6-4 which mysteriously states “some incidents may require facilities not included on the standard list”. The use of the word “facilities” would lead me to believe that these locations are already in place and are permanent in nature. But then you have to ask: what kind of facilities are important enough to already have in place, but too secretive to leave out of your police training?

I found it very interesting and thought I’d share.

Keep up the good work,

[Name Withheld]

Interesting, indeed!  It’s quite unsettling that FEMA is educating police officers around the nation that citizens may have to be placed into CAMPS at some point (for their own safety, of course), and that this practice is completely normal.

Now, I know that I bust on cops a lot on my site.  Truthfully though, I don’t actually dislike most individual police officers, but the corrupt governmental institution they serve.  Most cops are just honest, hard-working people–working a very difficult job.  They don’t want to violate people’s rights, but they also don’t want to get in trouble with their supervisors and risk losing their livelihoods.  I actually have several friends who are cops and, like the author of this letter, I can’t picture any of them voluntarily placing American Citizens into camps.  I’m hoping that, by sharing this email with all of you, maybe some other police who have received this training will realize what’s really going on, and how they are being conditioned.  Placing citizens in camps is not normal, it’s not necessary, and it never will be.

Milo Nickels began blogging and cartooning about politics in the year 2000.  After achieving some notoriety at that time, Milo took a break.  Now, Milo has launched a new website, Five Cent Revolution where he continues to write about political issues.  In particular, Milo focuses on constitutionalism, critiques of modern liberalism and progressivism, and defends individual liberty above all else.  Milo wants the government out of our wallets, out of our business, and out of our lives to the greatest extent possible. Read more at www.infowars.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/ant0t

Amplify’d from www.infowars.com

Shocker: Citizen Spy Networks to be Given Immunity

Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com January 27, 2011

New York Republican Peter King has introduced a bill that would protect the army of citizen spies Homeland Security hopes to recruit under Janet Napolitano’s “See Something, Say Something” snoop campaign from lawsuits brought by innocent people wrongly accused of being terrorists or extremists.

“A top US lawmaker unveiled legislation on Wednesday to protect individuals who tip off authorities to potential extremist threats from lawsuits, in the event that they turn out to finger innocents,” reports AFP.

House Homeland Security Chairman King, who is pushing the “See Something, Say Something Act,” wants to shield “good citizens who report suspicious activity” from facing the consequences of misidentifying innocent behavior as extremism or terror.

Of course, this will only encourage untrained people to report any behavior whatsoever, no matter how benign, as potential terrorism, creating an army of enthusiastic but hapless citizen spies.

“King said his bill would extend protections from individuals “who report suspicious activity anywhere,” adds the report, making reference to the DHS’ “See Something, Say Something” campaign, which characterizes paying for things with cash as a suspicious activity.

The program was launched with the aid of Orwellian telescreens at Wal-Mart checkouts that play a message from Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano encouraging Americans to report anything unusual to Wal-Mart managers. The program was subsequently expanded to include 9,000 federal buildings, as well as sports stadiums, businesses and communities in general.

DHS will no longer be limited to the airport in the form of the TSA, but will become a ubiquitous entity policing everyone through a network of citizen spies and infrastructure security technology. The agency will also assume the mantle of regulating Americans’ every behavior and activity. DHS signs are already in place all over the country telling people where they can and can’t park their cars.

As we have documented, every historical example of such informant programs illustrates that they never lead to a more secure society, but instead breed suspicion, distrust, fear and resentment amongst the population. The only “benefit” that such programs have ever achieved is allowing the state to more easily identify and persecute political dissidents, while discouraging the wider population from engaging in any criticism against the government.

Since its official launch, the See Something, Say Something campaign has successfully wasted thousands of dollars of taxpayer money after people reported half-empty flasks of coffee and bags of clothes as deadly threats that required a response from bomb squads.

Of course, as we have documented, the federal government is fully aware of the fact that Americans are just as likely to be killed by lightning strikes, peanut allergies or accident-causing deer than they are by terrorists.

See Something, Say Something has little to do with combating terrorism, and everything to do with implanting the notion that Americans are constantly under surveillance from each other and may be reported to the authorities for any minor example of aberrant behavior no matter how benign.

In addition, since the Department of Homeland Security has characterized political activism which targets the state as extremist and terrorist activity, Americans are being trained that exercising their constitutional rights could get them in hot water with the law should their behavior be deemed suspicious by ignorant wannabe citizen spies who see themselves as terrorist hunters.

In an ironic twist, Rep. King, who is now trying to protect snoops who identify innocent behavior as extremism from lawsuits, was one of the primary co-sponsors of a 2009 House resolution that attempted to get answers as to why Homeland Security equated veterans, gun owners, Ron Paul supporters, and people who fly the U.S. flag, with violent terrorists, following the release of the agency’s infamous MIAC report.

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show. Read more at www.infowars.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/ant0q

Amplify’d from www.inyork.com

York City mayor requests police protection after comments

JOHN WALK The York Dispatch

Bracey

During her year in office, York City Mayor Kim Bracey has received several "inappropriate comments" that have "raised flags," according to York City Police Chief Wes Kahley.

The comments have resulted in police protection requests at certain public events, Kahley said last week. Since Bracey took office, she has requested police protection two or three times a month, Kahley said.

Neither Kahley nor Bracey would explain the comments, other than to say they are not threatening.

An officer provides protection by traveling with Bracey to and from the event, Kahley said. And while at the event, the officer stays "within close proximity" of her, Kahley said.

"It depends on the event and the size of the crowd. But Kahley it's usually just one officer that goes with her," he said. The police department does not bring in an extra officer to provide the protection, Kahley said. An on-duty officer will escort the mayor and will typically stay one to two hours, he said. Protection: Bracey said she would prefer to not need the protection, but it's necessary because of the comments she has received and because her safety as the mayor is important. "I would prefer a society where everyone is safe, where we wouldn't have to worry about anything," she said. "Unfortunately that's not the type of society we're living in today." Bracey said she has not received any additional police protection since the Jan. 8 Arizona shooting rampage that killed six people and injured 14 others, including U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. "But if I could have it my way I would have it 24 hours a day," Bracey said. "And I've been told by city residents who believe that I should have protection all the time." Former York City Mayor John Brenner said he did not request any police protection while in office. Bracey's situation is different, he said, because "we live in a different time." "A U.S. congresswoman had an assassination attempt against her. A federal judge was killed. This is something that has really developed in recent years. It's just different today. And I would say that Mayor Bracey needs to do what's best for her," Brenner said. York City Council President Genevieve Ray said she does not have an opinion on the matter, but said that "it's important the mayor is safe." Councilwoman Toni Smith said she supports the mayor's protection service. "Why shouldn't she? She's the mayor. You never know the type of people that are out there today. By doing what she's doing, she's preventing something bad from happening," Smith said. -- Reach John Walk at 505-5439 or jwalk@york dispatch.com or follow on Twitter @ydcity. Read more at www.inyork.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/ant0g

Amplify’d from www.inyork.com

Relative: Mexico violence worried slain missionary

By PAUL J. WEBER Associated Press

A pray card handed out by Sam and Nancy Davis, missionaries working... ((AP Photo/Michael Conroy))

MONTE ALTO, Texas—A Texas couple who were attacked at an illegal roadblock in one of Mexico's most violent areas had been delivering babies and doing missionary work in the country for three decades, and they had come to expect such confrontations, the couple's son said Thursday. Nancy Davis, 59, was shot in the head Wednesday while her husband, Sam, was trying to speed away from suspected drug cartel gunmen who may have wanted to steal their pickup truck, authorities said. Sam Davis frantically raced to the Pharr International Bridge border checkpoint with his wife bleeding beside him, but she was declared dead at a McAllen hospital. "It would be easier to count the times they weren't chased," the couple's son, Joseph Family of missionary Nancy Davis, 59, are seen outside their home, Thursday, Jan. 27, 2011 in Pharr, Texas. Davis and her husband were allegedly attacked by gunmen in a dangerous part of Mexico may have been targeted for their expensive pickup truck, because drug gangs covet the vehicles, police said Thursday. Davis was shot and later died. ((AP Photo/Eric Gay)) Davis, told The Associated Press outside his family's home in the remote South Texas town of Monte Alto. Sam Davis' mother, Francille Davis, told the AP that her son and daughter-in-law were in Mexico Wednesday to pay pastors in some of the village churches the family had established, but that they had recently put off trips to Mexico because of the spiraling violence. She said the drug war had prevented Sam from reaching the churches earlier in the month. "Sam had gone in and there were dead bodies all over the place," Francille recalled, explaining that Nancy had stopped making some of those trips because of the risks. "But for some reason Nancy went in (on Wednesday) and did not come out" alive, she said.

Davises were driving along the two-lane road that connects the city of San Fernando with the border city of Reynosa, about 70 miles north, when they came upon the roadblock, an official in Mexico's Tamaulipas state attorney general's office who would not be identified because he is not authorized to discuss the case told the AP. The area where the couple were attacked is dominated by the Gulf Cartel, which has been waging a fierce turf war in northeastern Tamaulipas with the Zetas cartel Map locates area near the U.S.-Mexico border where a U.S. missionary was fatally shot (Map locates area near the U.S.-Mexico border where a U.S. missionary was fatally shot) for control of lucrative smuggling routes to the U.S. The area has had 40 violent car thefts in the last two months, the official said. Sam Davis told U.S. investigators that he tried to speed away from the gunmen, and that they gave chase in a pickup truck and opened fire, hitting his wife. Pharr police said Thursday that the couple's 2008 Chevrolet pickup is the kind of heavy-duty, high-profile truck prized by cartels, and that it's likely the reason the Davises were targeted. Damage to the truck's quarter-paneling suggests the gunmen tried to ram them, Pharr police Chief Ruben Villescas said. Wednesday's killing echoes the September attack on American tourist David Hartley and his wife on Falcon Lake, on the U.S.-Mexico border. Tiffany Hartley said she and her husband were Jet-Skiing in Mexican waters when pirates fired on them, striking her husband and forcing her to flee. His body was not recovered. "I just thank God that he was able to get back across the border with her," Hartley told the AP. Concerns about the investigation into David Hartley's death led Texas Gov. Rick Perry to call for a stronger response from Mexican authorities. On Thursday, Perry's spokeswoman, Katherine Cesinger, said Nancy Davis' slaying underscores the need for greater border security. There were conflicting reports about exactly where along the road the attack occurred. Pharr police said it happened near San Fernando, but the Tamaulipas official said it happened about 7 miles south of Reynosa. Joseph Davis said his parents were well aware of the risks they were taking travelling to Tamaulipas. Joseph Davis said his mother often text-messaged him after crossing the border to let him know they arrived safely. Tamaulipas is one of three Mexican states that accounted for 50 percent of the country's more than 15,000 murders last year, according to the Mexican government. The Mexican government in November sent more troops and federal police there in what it called a major operative to control drug violence, but drug gangs still roam freely in caravans of SUVs and trucks, attacking rivals, terrorizing locals and in some cases emptying entire towns. Merton Rundell III, a friend of the Davises and the director of finance at Union Bible College in Indiana, said the couple spent 80 to 90 percent of their time in Mexico and had a home in the Mexican state of Nuevo Leon. He said they spent the rest of their time at their home in McAllen or traveling the U.S. raising funds for Gospel Proclaimers Missionary Association, the organization they founded. "They've been working in Mexico for over 30 years. It was mainly establishing churches—that was their main thrust. "They loved the work they were doing in spite of the danger," Rundell said. Rundell described Nancy Davis as "a petite lady with a drive like you wouldn't believe. She lived life to the fullest. They were both totally given to (their work)." Joseph Davis said his mother loved music, and could compose songs and lyrics in minutes. But he said she loved the work she did most of all. "Time after time, what made her the happiest was seeing somebody hit their knees and come up forgiven for whatever they've done—murder, rape, the smallest sin," Joseph Davis said. "She'd come home so happy. She'd say, 'Well, we stole another one from the devil today.'" ——— Associated Press writers Terry Wallace and Linda Stewart Ball in Dallas, and Katherine Corcoran in Mexico City contributed to this report. Read more at www.inyork.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/ant05

Former Head of Dallas Crime Stoppers Office Indicted Defendants Collected at Least $250,000 for Bogus Tips

Amplify’d from dallas.fbi.gov

Former Head of Dallas Crime Stoppers Office Indicted Defendants Collected at Least $250,000 in Cash Rewards for Bogus Tips

DALLAS—A federal grand jury in Dallas has indicted Dallas Police Department Senior Corporal Theadora Ross and co-defendant Malva R. Delley each on one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with the Dallas Crime Stoppers program, announced U.S. Attorney James T. Jacks of the Northern District of Texas. Ross, 50, of Rowlett, Texas, was arrested midday yesterday and appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan late in the afternoon. She was released on bond. Delley, 36, is a Dallas resident.

The Crime Stoppers program is a nationwide program that offers cash rewards for information from anonymous callers that leads to the arrest and indictment of criminals. The program guarantees the anonymity of callers to promote a positive atmosphere without the prospect of retribution. The Dallas Crime Stoppers office is funded by the North Texas Crime Commission (NTCC), fines levied by the Dallas and Collin County courts, private donations and fund raising. The office is staffed by officers of the Dallas Police Department and deputies of the Dallas County Sheriff’s Office.

According to the indictment, which was just unsealed, Ross worked at the Dallas Crime Stoppers office from 2003 to May 2010, and headed that office from March 2006 to May 2010. A “tipster” who called the Crime Stoppers office with information would receive a “tip number.” The tipster then periodically called the Crime Stoppers office to find out if his information resulted in a reward. Ross, and other law enforcement officers assigned to the office, determined which tips were eligible for a cash reward based on the quality of information the tipster provided and whether the ultimate arrest or indictment of a particular subject was actually related to the tip provided.

Ross selected the tips that would be presented to the NTCC for approval of a cash reward. Once the NTCC gave its approval, the anonymous tipster could call the Crime Stoppers office with his previously assigned tip number and would be provided a tip number and code word. These tip numbers and code words were emailed to JP Morgan Chase Bank. The anonymous tipster was required to present the tip number and code word, in person, at Chase Bank, to collect his reward.

The indictment alleges, however, that as part of their scheme, Ross sent JP Morgan Chase Bank the Crime Stoppers cash reward list that included both legitimate code words as well as tip numbers and code words for tips that Ross had altered. Ross gave Delley the bogus tip information, including tip numbers and code words necessary to collect the rewards. After Delley presented the bogus tip numbers and code words to a bank teller at JP Morgan Chase and collected the reward, she would divide the cash, per Ross’s instruction, with Ross, by either depositing it into Ross’s personal bank account or by giving cash directly to Ross.

From February 2005 through May 2010, the conspirators collected at least $250,000 in cash rewards for bogus tips, resulting in a loss to the North Texas Crime Commission. However, no false arrests were made based on Ross’s actions.

An indictment is an accusation by a federal grand jury and a defendant is entitled to the presumption of innocence unless proven guilty. However, if convicted, Ross and Delley each face a maximum statutory sentence of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Restitution could also be ordered.

The case is being investigated by the FBI and Dallas Police Department - Public Integrity Unit and prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Errin Martin and Rick Calvert. Read more at dallas.fbi.gov

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/anszr

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com

The Secrets of Rome.m4v

See more at www.youtube.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/anszo

Gamaliel and the Barack Obama Connection

Amplify’d from endrtimes.blogspot.com

Gamaliel and the Barack Obama Connection

Photo (Courtesy) http://goodjesuitbadjesuit.blogspot.com/2009/10/young-barack-obama-former-jesuit-named.html by Gregory A. Galluzzo President elect Barack Obama has throughout his political career made repeated references to his time as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago. It is important that we all understand the connection between Barack and Gamaliel. In l980 Mary Gonzales and I created the United Neighborhood Organization of Chicago. In l982 we decided that we needed some expertise from someone who had done faith based community organizing. A person who had worked as such an organizer in Illinois and in Pennsylvania approached me about joining our organizing team. His name was Jerry Kellman. Jerry helped Mary and myself become better organizers. While he was working for us, he connected with a group called the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) operating on the South Side in the South Suburbs of Chicago, and in Indiana. CCRC had been formed in response to the massive shut down of major industry and the resulting job loss and all of the concomitant social tragedies. Jerry and I reached an understanding that we would support his work in the South Suburbs so that he could become director of his own project. It was Jerry Kellman who put an ad in the New York Times about an organizing position in the Chicago area. Barack responded; Jerry interviewed him and offered him a position. Barack accepted. Almost at this very time, Jerry propositioned an old friend of his to return to Chicago from Texas and work with him in this new organizing venture. His friend was Mike Kruglik. Mike and Jerry were the first mentors of Barack in organizing. CCRC, which spanned communities in Northwest Indiana, the South Suburbs and parts of the City of Chicago proved to be unwieldy. Jerry and I decided to split it into three parts. Barack would work to found a new independent project in the South side of Chicago, Mike Kruglik would be the director of the South Suburban Action Conference and Jerry Kellman would develop organizing in Northwest Indiana. At that point Jerry asked me to become Barack’s consultant. And at this time we were just creating the Gamaliel Foundation. I met with Barack on a regular basis as he incorporated the Developing Communities Project, as he moved the organization into action and as he developed the leadership structure for the organization. He would write beautiful and brilliant weekly reports about his work and the people he was engaging. When Barack decided to go to Harvard Law School, he approached John McKnight, a professor at Northwestern and a Gamaliel Board member for a letter of recommendation. When Barack was leaving he made sure that Gamaliel was the formal consultant to the organization that he had created and to the staff that he had hired. Barack has acknowledged publicly that he had been the director of a Gamaliel affiliate. He has supported Gamaliel throughout the years by conducting training both at the National Leadership Training events and at the African American Leadership Commission. He has also attended our public meetings. We are honored and blessed by the connection between Barack and Gamaliel. ... Gregory Galluzzo, a former Jesuit priest, is the Executive Director of the Gamaliel Foundation. In 1980 Galluzzo co-founded, along with his wife Mary Gonzalez, a Chicago Latino activist organization called the United Neighborhood Organization (UNO). Today, Ms. Gonzalez is the Gamaliel Foundation’s Director of Western Territory. UNO, also modeled after Alinsky’s methods, is known for using aggressive organizing and confrontational tactics to push for change. . Source . Read more at endrtimes.blogspot.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/anszn

Amplify’d from www.debbieschlussel.com

Imam Caught Sneaking Into US; Iranian Terrorism Book Found in Border Desert

By Debbie Schlussel

Neither of today’s news stories on illegal alien Muslims at the border are news to me, since I’ve been complaining about this for years.  The first–about an extremist imam (redundant phrase) caught trying to sneak into the U.S.–isn’t the first time that’s happened.  Nor, is the second story–about an extremist Islamic book from Iran being found in the desert on the trail into the U.S.  As I’ve noted before, WSB-TV covered this when they noted the many Korans, Islamic terrorist flags and logos, and Iranian uniforms, etc. in the desert at the U.S. and Mexican borders.  That FOX News was told by Border Patrol that they found, “In Memory of Our Martyrs,” a book celebrating Islamic suicide bombers in the desert ain’t a scoop. We know Islamic terrorists and otherwise extremist Muslims are coming here and are already here.  Not a secret.  But also not enough to make anyone care to do anything about it.

Imam Said Jaziri Tried to Sneak Into U.S.

What IS news, however, to those not in the know about how these trials are conducted, is that the extremist imam who illegally tried to sneak into the U.S. has already agreed to testify against the traitorous American who drove him here.  He didn’t agree to do this “just ‘cuz.”  Usually that’s in exchange for some sort of deal–the U.S. government agreeing not to jail this bastard . . . or even giving the imam assurances that he can stay on U.S. shores indefinitely. Sometimes–way too many times–illegal aliens are even given green cards and citizenship for their testimony in these cases.  That’s, sadly, how it all works in many of these cases.  It all seems like a plot that was designed by the U.S. government in the first place, to help accept yet another extremist, sharia-lover inside the U.S. The government says they’ll deport the guy, but I’ll believe it when I see it.

More:

Authorities are holding a Muslim cleric who was ousted from Canada three years ago and discovered this month hiding in the trunk of a BMW after after he illegally crossed into San Diego County from Mexico.

Said Jaziri, a Tunisian imam, is expected to testify against American citizen Kenneth Robert Lawler, who was driving the vehicle Jan. 11. Lawler is charged with immigrant smuggling.

According to court documents, Jaziri traveled from Tunisia to Spain to Guatemala to El Salvador to Belize and then to Chetumal, Mexico. He rode a bus from there to Tijuana, where he found someone to smuggle him into the U.S.

Jaziri said he paid $5,000 to a smuggling group, namely a white man named Robert who spoke English.

“He told Robert he just wanted to go to a safe place anywhere in the United States,” court records show.

Jaziri will undergo deportation proceedings for illegal entry and unlawful presence in the U.S. after the case against Lawler is closed, said Steven Pitts, a spokesman for the U.S. Border Patrol.

In 2007, Jaziri was deported from Canada to Tunisia for lying on his refugee application about jail time he served in France years earlier. His supporters said Canadian officials targeted him for his Islamic fundamentalism, according to news reports in Canada.

As imam of the Al-Qods mosque in Montreal, Jaziri was well-known for being outspoken on behalf of Sharia, a strict form of Islamic law, including his denunciation of homosexuality. . . .

Jaziri successfully scaled a border wall on Jan. 10 and made an overnight trek through the backcountry, according to court documents. He, the guide and Mexican national Gonzalo Gutierrez-Mercado emerged near Tierra Del Sol Road close to the intersection of Moon Valley Road, where the BMW was waiting. . . .

A group of state firefighters watched the men climb into the BMW and one of them reported the incident to a border Patrol agent. . . .

Lawler, who told authorities that he was homeless and unemployed, said he was instructed to take Jaziri and Gutierrez-Mercado to a parking lot in Mission Viejo for a hand-off. The travelers’ final destination remains unknown, according to court records.

G-d bless the patriotic firefighter, who reported this to Border Patrol. Thankfully, he was taken seriously. How sad that homelessness and unemployment are somehow an excuse to sell out your country in the case of Lawler.  It’s exactly the plot of “Frozen River” (read my review).  And if you insist on driving a BMW, maybe that’s why you’re homeless.

So, where was Jaziri going in the U.S.? What was his final destination? With whom was he meeting and/or going to stay? What were they planning?

We may never know, and I doubt the feds made that information a part of the plea deal. But with his lengthy planes, trains, and automobiles effort to get here, he was apparently highly motivated . . and you can bet it wasn’t for a good reason. Read more at www.debbieschlussel.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/anszm

Amplify’d from www.debbieschlussel.com

“Number of US Muslims to More Than Double”: Warned Ya

By Debbie Schlussel

For more than a decade–well before 9/11–I’ve warned that because we do nothing and because authorities like Bush and Obama increased Muslim immigration to America, their numbers would increase through immigration and the fact that their women have the single purpose of high-birthrate mass production baby machines.  And, as I’ve always said, it makes no difference that our soldiers are fighting pointless fights over there while they slowly but surely take over here.  When Barack Obama lectured America in the State of the Union that “American Muslims are part of the American family,” the real truth is that they are a foreign cancer that has invaded America.  Their cells are not only multiplying faster and faster, but Islam in America has metastasized.  It is only a matter of slowing it down. Now, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life finds that–IF Islamic immigration (legal and illegal) and high birthrates continue (and that’s a pretty good bet, based on our inaction on these issues)–Muslims in America will more than double their numbers by 2030.

We already see how–as a tiny, vocal minority–they’ve imposed their intolerance and backward ways on this country.  Just imagine how much worse it will get when their numbers double and their critical mass is that much closer.

Muslims will be more than one-quarter of the Earth’s population by 2030, according to a study released today.

The number of U.S. Muslims will more than double, so you are as likely to know a Muslim here in 20 years as you are to know someone Jewish or Episcopalian today.

Those are among key findings in “The Future of the Global Muslim Population,” the first comprehensive examination of Muslims, whose numbers have been growing at a faster rate than all other groups combined.

“We’re not surprised. Our mosques and schools are already overflowing,” says Imam Johari Abdul-Malik, outreach director of a mosque in Falls Church, Va.

The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life analyzed statistics from United Nations data and census material from more than 200 countries and studies by 50 international demographers.

If immigration patterns and Muslims’ comparatively higher birth rates continue, Pew projects:

•U.S. Muslims will go from a tiny minority now, less than 1% of the nation, to 1.7%. That’s a jump from 2.6 million people in 2010 to 6.2 million.

•Muslim immigration to the USA and Muslims’ share of all new legal permanent residents will continue to rise. Most of the immigrants will arrive from South Asia, the Middle East and Africa. •Though 64.5% of U.S. Muslims today were born abroad, that percentage will fall to 55% as the number of native-born Muslims rises.

•Worldwide, Muslims will climb from 23.4% to 26.4% of the population, going from 1.6 billion people in 2010 to 2.2 billion in 2030, concentrated in Muslim-majority countries. . . .

In several northern and eastern European nations, the percentage of Muslims will near or pass 10%, raising their political and cultural clout, particularly in urban areas.

Alan Cooperman, Pew Forum associate director of research, says the Muslim rate is “growing but slowing” and political and economic uncertainties can make dramatic shifts in projections.

Below is a graph of the Pew numbers of Muslims around the world and their predicted levels in 2030.  I think those numbers–in many cases–are too low.  In France, it’s well known that Muslims are already at least 17-20% of the country.  And, in fact, the French can’t even put a solid number on it because they’ve allowed so many Muslim illegal aliens to invade their shores.  The same goes for Britain.  The numbers look low for a place where Mohammed is the most popular birth name.  Sorry, but I’m not buying that they are only 4.6% of the population there.

The people who did this study said they can’t predict levels of extremism or religiosity in Muslims in America. But that’s an irrelevant question. It’s like asking how many fat people weigh less than 100 pounds. As we all know, the dominant strain of Islam around the world–whether Shi’ite or Sunni Islam–is extremist. The majority of Muslims openly support Hezbollah and HAMAS and idolize Bin Laden. They cheered the 9/11 attacks from Ramallah to Paterson, New Jersey, to Dearbornistan, Michigan.  We know that you’d be hard-pressed to find a single Muslim cleric or community leader in America who will openly condemn HAMAS or Hezbollah.

Pew is the same organization that found that at least a third of American Muslims–particularly younger and immigrant Muslims–support violent jihad, including homicide bombing attacks on innocent civilians. We have every reason to believe that the majority of Muslims–as more are born here and more are allowed to invade our borders–will be every bit as extremist, if not more so. That’s just Islam, plain and simple. To say otherwise is to be in denial.

If you are not bothered by the projected increase in Muslims in America, then you should ask yourself:  do I want cars burning and riots in the streets every year like they have in Paris?  Do I want Muslims controlling elections and municipalities like they do in many locations in Europe and throughout the Middle East?  Do I want to wear a niqab (full-ninja face-veil) and pay the jizya (tax on non-Muslims)?  If you don’t think a growing Muslim population will ultimately–in a few generations–end up with these things, then you have your head buried in the sand.

The handwriting is on the wall.  When will we deal with it?  It is already too late.  You will not see these things, but your grandchildren and great-children and their progeny will.  Is that okay with you? Read more at www.debbieschlussel.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/anszk

Amplify’d from www.debbieschlussel.com

Honor Killing Dad’s New Halal Twinkie Defense: Spitting?!

By Debbie Schlussel

In 2009, I told you about Muslim honor-killing Dad, Faleh Hassan Almaleki, the Arizona resident who murdered his daughter, Noor Faleh Almaleki, because she was becoming “too Western.”  His idea of “too Western,” included her shopping at “Forever 21,” eating fast food, and texting friends with the word, “dude.”  Wow.  Scandalous.  And since both Daddy Islamic Dearest and his now-deceased daughter (whom he ran over) are both U.S. citizens, I guess this must mean they are the “American Muslims” Barack Hussein Obama told us, last night, are a “part of the American family.” As reader, Joe, wrote, “Nobody in my family ever ran over their kids because they put on too much makeup.”

Well, now, Mr. Almaleki has a new form of the Halal Twinkie Defense: “I got distracted trying to spit on another woman.”

Daddy Dearest Faleh Almaleki’s Honor Killing Halal Twinkie Defense

A fanatical Iraqi-born Muslim charged with killing his beautiful daughter because she wanted to live a normal American life whined yesterday that he ran her over by accident — because he was concentrating on spitting at another woman. . . .

Almaleki’s lawyer said his client was only trying to demonstrate his disgust with the woman standing next to Noor — her boyfriend’s mother — and wound up hitting them both.

But a prosecutor said in opening remarks that Almaleki was so enraged by his daughter’s Westernization that he “revved and raced” his car directly at his child.

“Noor wanted to live her life like those her own age, but the defendant would not allow it,” said Laura Reckart.

After Almaleki moved in with her boyfriend’s family, her father told the dad that if Noor didn’t leave, “something bad was going to happen,” a court document said.

And, per usual, with many of these Muslim immigrants we’ve taken in from Iraq (and everywhere else), the deceased daughter was helping her boyfriend’s Iraqi Muslim mom sign up for welfare. Cha-ching!

Earlier, Noor had glimpsed her dad at the state office where she was helping translate forms for Amal Khalaf, her boyfriend’s mom.

“Dude,” Noor texted a friend, “my dad is here at the welfare office,” the Broward-Palm Beach New Times said.

Yup, just more of the “American family” Barack Obama told us about, last night. Because, hey, there aren’t enough Americans on welfare. We need to allow Iraqi Muslims to immigrate here to collect welfare and murder their daughters. And to “spit” on people.  This is a Shi’ite Muslim family.  Shi’ites are now in control of Iraq because we sent in American soldiers to die for that questionable cause.  Why must we now bring more Iraqi Shi’ite Muslims (all of them loyal to Iran and Hezbollah) into this country?

Religion of Peace, baby! Read more at www.debbieschlussel.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/anszg

Luis Martin S.J. Punishment for the 'drug war' cigarette market protection

Amplify’d from continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com

Luis Martin S.J. Punishment for the 'drug war' cigarette market protection

Luis Martin was the 24th Superior General of the Jesuit Order, from 1892 to 1906, a period encompassing the 1904 start of the demonification of cocaine shortly following the 2nd time the Vaticcan would give a Papal medel award as a 'benefactor of humanity' to Coca product entrepeneur Angelo Francois Mariani (1838-1914) http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/07/roman-catholic-church-cocaine.html Note that cocaine's demonification in the U.S. at the official level came through the USDA (Department of Agrilculture- charged with promoting US domestic agrilcultural commodities) via Harvey Washington Wiley, described in a letter to him in 1908 inviting him to a 'smoker for all of the knights', who collaborated with Vatican loyalist William Randolph Hearst to popularize what later became known as the 20th century 'drug war' scheme with US food and drug laws that would require retail product labeling for ingrediants, do this for everything EXCEPT cigarettes, alcoholic beverages and cosmetics, while providing severe sentences for possessing Marijuana, Opium and Coca - with the sad result of prohibition's iron law of perverting the latter two into concentrated heroin and cocaine hci/sulfate. Note that with regards to the plants used as stimulants -- aka Coffee, the various caffeine containing teas, Tobacco, Betal Nut and Coca Leaf, its has been stated: http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/03/coca-leaf-stands-out-among-all.html In each major category of intoxicant used by our species, there appear to be one or two drug plants that researchers have noted, are more controllable, hence safer, than all the other plants or synthetics in that category. Coca leaf stands out among all the stimulants, licit and illicit, as the easiest to control and the one least likely to produce toxicity or dependency. This was by UCLA's Dr. Ronald K. Siegel was an expert wittness regarding the June 1986 fatal cocaine overdose of Len Bias that would be media hyped for an organized political reaction for a more punitive pharamacratic inquisition. The drug 'laws' -- statutes may be a better term as such 'laws' are not legitimate expressions of any commerce clause for protecting the general welfare but rather RICO-False Claims actionable conspriracy-racketeering for market protection, particularly for alcohol and that duet of cigarettes and pharama so indelibly conveyed by those many cigarette advertisements in medical journals conveying an organized medical professions's endorsement of cigarettes beseaking of an alliance of criminal mercantilism extending throughout government: a criminal mercantilism with extremely high costs from those of protecting the most dangerous from the most safe, and the latter's perversion, to that upon the 'law' enforcement and criminal 'justice' complex. Fear of market penetration by Coca at the expense of Tobacco figured strongly in USDA concerns 1908-1914: It was criminal mercantilism to protect Tobacco cigarettes http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/03/it-was-criminal-mercantilism-to-protect.html So did consciousnous of the reletive dangers to 'narcotics' constrolled substances' of Tobacco on th efloor of the US Congress during the very discussions upon the 1914 Harrison 'Narcotoc' Tax Act: 1914 US Congress: '10s of thousands who dies every year from the excessive use of cigarettes' http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/08/1914-tens-of-thousands-in-us-who-die.html There are numerous historical indications of Coca as a threat to Tobacco and alcoholism, such as this account by latter 1800s French Dr. Liberman and Villeneuve: “I have also employed it in cases, happily rare in our army, of chronic alcoholism resulting from the abuse of brandy, absinthe or strong liquors. The produced all the excitement sought by drinkers, but had at the same time a sedative influence on their nervous systems. I have frequently seen hardened drinkers renounce their fatal habit and return to a healthy condition." "I have also used to save smokers of exaggerated habits, from nicotinism. A few glasses of taken in small doses, either pure or mixed with water, acted as a substitute for pipes and cigars, because the smokers found in it the cerebral excitement which they sought in tobacco, wholly preserving their intellectual faculties." Coca to Combat Opiate, Alcohol and Tobacco Addiction http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/03/coca-to-combat-opiate-alcohol-and.html 1906-1914+ Agrilcultural Market Protection Racket http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/08/1907-1914-market-protection-racket-cig_17.html 1904-2004 USDA http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/08/1904-2004-usda.html Note Luis Martin's agonizing death: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Mart%C3%ADn Suffering and death Even at the beginning of his term Martín's physical health had been poor and it grew steadily worse with the years. In 1905, a tumor forced the amputation of his right arm. Pope Pius X granted him permission to celebrate mass despite his disability, a privilege for which he was most grateful. The cancer, however, soon invaded his lungs and he died in Rome, on 18 April 1906. Read more at continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/ansze