ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

The Most Heinous Killers of the Holocaust: the Muslim-Catholic Ustasha

Edwin Black
Book Covers - Farhud book
Edwin Black is the author of IBM and the Holocaust. This article is drawn from his just released book, The Farhud, Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance During the Holocaust (Dialog 2010). Buy it here

In the hierarchy of Hell that created the Holocaust, one group of killers stands out as more vicious, murderous, and bloodcurdling than all others. Who were they? Where did they plow their killing fields? How and why did they come together to sear a chronicle of atrocities a magnitude worse than Auschwitz?

The answer: None were more savage than the Ustasha of Yugoslavia, a Muslim-Catholic alliance of Nazi killers so gruesome and beastly that even Berlin shirked in horror at the slaughter. This berserk army of ghastly murderers, the Ustasha, and three related crack divisions of Arab-Nazi Waffen SS comprised of tens of thousands of Muslim volunteers, terrorized people of all faiths in Yugoslavia. In large measure, these murder machines emerged through the efforts of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini. The Grand Mufti was on a mission to accelerate the extermination of all Jews everywhere. His partner was Adolf Hitler—personally. The epic story of this alliance of horror and hate is one that begins in Jerusalem, travels to Baghdad, culminates in the killing fields of the Balkans, and ultimately spread across all Europe.

In many ways, the scene was set centuries ago by the Medina Extermination of 627. Medina was a largely Jewish city. When its 600 or so Jews refused to convert to the new Muslim religion, the Prophet Muhammad mass-murdered them in a protracted ceremony, beheading the Jewish faithful one by one. This massacre became a glorious iconic event in Islamic history, as memorable to Muslims as the Sermon on the Mount is to Christians or the parting of the Red Sea is to Jews.

After Medina, the Islamic Conquest swept across the Middle East and North Africa, forcibly converting all, and inventing the Muslim World. In about 700, the Pact of Umar declared that Jews and Christians under Muslim control could continue as non-Muslims, but only as dhimmis, that is, second class citizens reviled for their existence and denied many ordinary rights. Dhimmis could practice their religion only under often-denigrating restrictions. Throughout the ages while dwelling in the various realms of the Muslim world, Jews and Christians were either allowed to excel and thrive, or were brutally repressed and persecuted, depending upon the decade and territory. But the context of their existence—whether successful or subjugated— was always as second-class citizens deserving death if Koranic injunctions were observed.

Of many condemning Koranic verses, typical is Sura 9:30: “And the Jews say: Uzair [Ezra] is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!”

From the Hadith: “The Hour [the Day of Judgment] will not begin until the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them. A Jew will hide behind a rock or a tree, and the rock or tree will say, ‘O Muslim, O slave of Allah! There is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!’”

Islam’s many hateful anti-Jewish mandates were not just ancient textual relics, but continuous inspiration and guidance right through the twentieth century, oft quoted by Islamic leaders in many lands throughout the centuries.

When the League of Nations, Britain, France, the United States, Germany, and finally Turkey endorsed a Jewish homeland, each with a formal resolution resembling that of the Balfour Declaration, it ignited a seismic outrage among Arabs. The very thought of Jews living as equals was vile and anathema to Palestinian Arabs. From 1920, their regular rallying call was “Itbach Al Yahood! Itbach Al Yahood!” Slaughter the Jews. Slaughter the Jews. This was done, year after year. With knives and rifles, in small spontaneous groups and organized mobs, Arabs murdered Palestinian Jews, burned their torahs, laid waste to their synagogues, and made bitter days as Jews tried to rebuild a homeland. Indeed, in 1929, when Jews sat down while they prayed—violating Sharia prohibitions on Jews sitting at the Wailing Wall—a mob of Arab killers swarmed over Hebron sadistically killing dozens. The Jewish baker was baked in his own oven. A Jewish scholar’s brain was extricated and used as a ball.

In 1937, the Peel Report concluded that two states should be created, one Arab and one Jewish, living side by side. But the Muslim world would not tolerate the notion of co-existence with Jews as equals. The Prophet Muhammad’s anti-Jewish words were constantly repeated.

“Our hatred for the Jews dates from God’s condemnation of them for their persecution and rejection of Isa [Jesus Christ], and their subsequent rejection later of His chosen Prophet [Muhammad] … Verily the word of God teaches us, and we implicitly believe this … for a Muslim to kill a Jew … ensures him an immediate entry into Heaven and into the august presence of God Almighty. What more then can a Muslim want in this hard world?” These words were spoken by the King of Saudi Arabia in an official lecture to the British Foreign Ministry in 1937.

The leader of the Palestinians was the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, al-Husseini. The Nazi-Arab alliance had been aggressively sought by the Arabs of Palestine since the Third Reich’s first moments in 1933. After the Peel Report, the Mufti and his loyal followers launched a murderous, non-stop insurrection known as the Arab Revolt. When the British tried to arrest him, the Mufti fled to Iraq where he helped foment a coup through the Golden Square. In Iraq, the Mufti found a virulent and widely embraced Arab-Nazi movement. Mein Kampf had been serialized in Arabic. Hitler Youth-style Arab regiments were well organized. On June 1-2, 1941, after a failed Nazi-Arab attempt to completely exterminate the Jews of Iraq, Baghdad Nazis, the police and national military units went on a two-day murder spree. They killed, raped, dismembered and pillaged. Once the British finally restored order, the Mufti fled again, this time to Iran where another failed Nazi takeover was thwarted. From Iran, the Mufti and his cohorts escaped to Berlin to meet Hitler personally.

In Berlin, a pact was sealed to provide Arab oil and battlefield military assistance sufficient to help the Nazi push into Russia in exchange for recognizing an Arab national state and exterminating the Jews. Arab military units formed from Paris to Palestine. Arabs and Muslims worldwide, on the radio and in newspapers, incessantly and openly called for the extermination of the Jews. The rallying cry was: “In Heaven, Allah is your master. On Earth is Adolf Hitler.”

When Heinrich Himmler needed to fight the partisans of Yugoslavia to protect German supply lines, the Mufti visited the region and helped organize tens of thousands of Muslims and Arabs into three Waffen SS divisions. Those three divisions—the Handschar, the Skandebeg, and the Kama—formed artillery brigades, transport battalions, infantry companies, and fought a bloody trench and mountain warfare against the partisans in Albania, Bosnia, Croatia, and the other Balkan territories.

Concomitantly, a Nazi murder militia, known as Ustasha, was created from a legion of Catholic and Muslim killers. The history is complex. In the Croatian maelstrom of ethnic and religious hatred, steered by Nazi mentors and puppet masters, Catholic Croats ironically decreed that all Muslims were Croats. This enabled the Catholic Croats to establish a majority in their enlarged territorial domain. That enlarged Independent State of Croatia was known in the dialect as Nezavisna Država Hrvatska, or the NDH. The NDH’s all-controlling killing and terror militia was the Ustasha, the worst perpetrators of depraved killing in the Holocaust. The Independent State of Croatia was in fact a bi-ethnic murder regime sworn to exterminate the millions of Yugoslavians who were neither Catholic nor Muslim through their bi-ethnic killing machine, the Ustasha.

Although Muslims were a minority in the NDH, the Bosniak Muslim faction and the Croatian Catholics jointly ruled and jointly murdered. The NDH’s fascist extremist president was staunch Hitler ally and former Jesuit seminarian, Ante Paveli. His official title was Poglavnik, a Croatian word that approximates der Führer. The vice president was Muslim Džafer-beg Kulenovi, previously president of the Yugoslav Moslem Organization, a Bosniak nationalist organization.

The Croatian Minister of Culture and Education was Mile Budak, a rabid Catholic-Nazi who propagated the axiom of killing one-third, converting one-third and expelling one-third of all Serbs. Budak and other Catholic Croats believed that Muslims were actually descendants of the ancient Bogomil people who had inhabited the Croatian lands centuries earlier. As a leader in forging the Muslim-Catholic alliance, Budak enthusiastically proclaimed in 1941, “We Croats are happy and proud of our [Christian] faith, but we must be conscious of the fact that our Muslim brothers are the purest of Croats.” He elaborated in a speech that the NDH was “Christian. [But] it is also a Muslim state where our people are of the Muslim religion.”

In July 1941, Budak openly declared that the new state must exterminate “foreign elements,” that is, Jews and Gypsies as well as the larger enemy, Orthodox Serbs. Budak hid nothing about his plans. “The basis for the Ustasha movement is religion,” announced Budak. “For minorities such as Serbs, Jews, and Gypsies, we have 3 million bullets.”

To cement the Muslim and Catholic killing coalition, NDH president Paveli converted a local Zagreb museum to a huge and impressive mosque, adding surrounding minarets to its modern architecture, and naming the mosque after himself. Numerous NDH ministries were controlled or headed by Muslims. Paveli even donned a Muslim fez to show his solidarity. Muslims were invited to join the barbaric Croatian Peasant Party and did so in significant numbers. When Muslims served in the Ustasha First Regiment, known as Black Legion, their black uniforms were the same as their Catholic co-killers. Senior officers were dressed in identical garb. Ibrahim Piri-Pjani and Memesaga Dzubur led their own local Ustasha-affiliated contingents. Muslim Ustasha Muhamed Hadžiefendi led his own militia in Tuzla. Hadžiefendi’s militia became so strong that Bosniaks wanted it to operate autonomously in Muslim areas of Bosnia.

The Diet legislature, which passed a sequence of genocidal decrees, included 11 Muslims specifically appointed for that purpose. These decrees included outlawing Serbian and Jewish existence in Croatia, the looting of Serbian and Jewish property, and the systematic regimentation of Serbian and Jewish citizens into death camps and merciless killing fields. Catholic priests commonly operated the concentration camps, enforcing the most degrading of slaughter rituals. In Sarajevo, most of the looted and confiscated property of victims went to Muslims, who raced to grab Jewish and Serbian assets before their Catholic partners.

Under Croatian decrees, Jews were compelled to wear yellow Star-of-David arm bands and back patches marked with a “Z” for Zidov—Croatian for Jew. Muslims plundered and decimated the Great Sephardic Synagogue in Sarajevo and the centuries-old synagogue in Dubrovnik. When Muslim families were moved out of their villages near the battle lines, the Ustasha evicted Jews from their homes so the Croatian Muslims could take their place. When Jews fled the November 1941 mass roundups in Sarajevo, preparatory to planned extermination, a number of them escaped only by disguising themselves under Muslim veils. At the same time, many of the Jews who did survive the Jew-hunts did so by appealing to merciful neighbors in the Muslim quarter that took them in and hid them until they could escape safely. Many Muslims in Sarajevo rejected the Bosniak Ustasha horror and tried—in vain—to protest to their co-religionists.

Serbs suffered enormously. As Serbs were being forcibly converted to Catholicism, some 450 Serbian Orthodox churches were demolished and their religious icons defiled. Orthodox clergymen, from ordinary priests to the Metropolitan, were gruesomely tortured and their families shipped to concentration camps where they were subjected to every inhumanity.

NDH President Paveli declared early on, “This is now the Ustasha and Independent State of Croatia. It must be cleansed of all Serbs and Jews. There is no room for any of them here. Not a stone upon a stone will remain of what once belonged to them.” He later assured, “The Jews will be liquidated within a very short time.” To this end, more than 20 Ustasha concentration camps were established for the killing process, manned by combined Catholic and Muslim forces. The most notorious of these camps was the hellish complex known as Jasenovac, considered by many to be more sadistic than Auschwitz by an immeasurable magnitude. Gas chambers were not needed. All death was personally inflicted.

The Ustasha’s barbaric methods for exterminating Jews and Serbs included sadistic group killing by cracking heads open with hammers until the cranial cavity was exposed. That was for adults. Children were commonly marched into the forest, where their heads were crushed with long mallets. Sometimes children were thrown live into flaming furnaces. Decapitation or dismemberment with giant lumber saws was frequent; Branko Jungic was one of many Serb villagers subjected to this monstrous murder technique. The terrifying photograph of his dismemberment became famous. Neck punctures with great iron bars were commonly accompanied by bowls carefully positioned to collect spurting blood, thus sparing uniforms the splatter. All too often, these Ustasha atrocities were not committed in fits of mad rage, but for sport, with the gleeful perpetrators smiling for the camera over the helpless victim waiting to be brutalized.

Mass throat-slittings at great velocity were achieved with a small hand blade wrapped tight to the wrist and dubbed the “Serbcutter.” They were specially designed and manufactured for the purpose. One night, guards at Jasenovac wagered amongst themselves to see who could cut the most throats with their Serbcutters. Guard Petar Brzica, a Franciscan priest, was determined to prove his skill, which he did by slicing the throats of an estimated 1,360 defenseless inmates. Guard Ante Zrinusic lost the bet by only cutting the throats of about 600 helpless prisoners. Guard Mile Friganovi was close behind the winner, murdering only about 1,100 Serbs that night. But Friganovi was also known for an unspeakable incident in which an old man was asked to shout a salute to Croat president Ante Pavelić. When the old man hesitated, Friganovi systematically and gleefully cut off his ears first, then the nose and tongue, after which he gouged out his eyes, and then extracted the victim’s heart—and only after all that did Friganovi end it all by slitting the prisoner’s throat. Friganovi called the experience one of “ecstasy.”

Groups of shivering Jewish children were brought into a camp one day. For sport, one guard began spinning a child above his head as the other guards slashed at it with their bayonets. Eventually, the guard was left with nothing but the child’s hand as a trophy. Other Ustasha trophies included eyeball collections, stored in wicker baskets for show and sometimes worn strung up in necklaces. NDH president Pavelić himself once showed a journalist a wicker basket filled with some 40 pounds of eyeballs. Paveli joked that he could make an oyster stew with them.

Women were carted away and raped endlessly until their captors were finished—at which time they were horribly mutilated for souvenir body parts. “A good Ustasha,” Pavelić told his troops, “is he who can use his knife to cut a child from the womb of its mother.”

The bi-ethnic Ustasha never disappointed their president.

Cruel and inhumane as the Nazis were, they retreated in wide-eyed astonishment when they learned of the joint Catholic-Muslim Ustasha atrocities. German General Edmund Glaise von Horstenau, the commanding officer of the region headquartered in Zagreb, reported back to Berlin, “According to reliable reports from countless German military and civil observers during the last few weeks, the Ustasha have gone raging mad.” He added, “The Ustasha camps … are the ‘epitome of horror!’” In revulsion, Glaise von Horstenau wrote, “The most wicked [concentration camp] of all must be Jasenovac, where no ordinary mortal is allowed to peer in.”

Hermann Naubacher, Hitler’s personal assistant for the Balkans, called the Ustasha exterminations “a crusade that belongs among the most brutal mass-murder undertakings in the entire history of the world.” Naubacher somberly added, “According to the reports that have reached me, my estimate is that the number of those defenseless slaughtered is some three-quarters of a million.”

Eventually, the Nazis fell. Their allies in the Ustasha, and the three Waffen SS divisions faced post-war justice in many cases. But too many melted into the turbulent history of the Cold War. The Mufti escaped to become a revered icon of the Palestinian people.

The legacy of Islamic and Arab hate that spurred the Farhud burned broad enough to help Hitler get ever closer to his goal of exterminating all Jews. But the Third Reich fell. And those in the Arab-Nazi movement went on to form the post-war geopolitical Middle East that prevails in the current century.

Edwin Black is the author of IBM and the Holocaust. This article is drawn from his recently released book The Farhud: Roots of the Arab-Nazi Alliance During the Holocaust (Dialog 2010). Buy it here

Read more at www.thecuttingedgenews.com
 

Pope says online social networks can help spread the Gospel

Amplify’d from www.catholicnews.com
Pope says online social networks can help spread the Gospel
(CNS/Isabella Bonotto, Catholic Press Photo)

By John Thavis

Catholic News Service



VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Pope Benedict XVI invited Christians to join online social networks in order to spread the Gospel through digital media and discover "an entirely new world of potential friendships."



At the same time, the pope warned of the limits and the dangers of digital communication, including the risks of constructing a false online image and of replacing direct human contact with virtual relationships.



"Entering cyberspace can be a sign of an authentic search for personal encounters with others, provided that attention is paid to avoiding dangers such as enclosing oneself in a sort of parallel existence, or excessive exposure to the virtual world," the pope said in his message for the 2011 celebration of World Communications Day.



"In the search for sharing, for 'friends,' there is the challenge to be authentic and faithful, and not give in to the illusion of constructing an artificial public profile for oneself," he said.



The theme of this year's World Communications Day, which will be celebrated June 5, is "Truth, proclamation and authenticity of life in the digital age." In his message, released Jan 24, the pope acknowledged that the Internet has fundamentally changed the way people communicate today.



"This means of spreading information and knowledge is giving birth to a new way of learning and thinking, with unprecedented opportunities for establishing relationships and building fellowship," he said.



In the digital world, he said, information is increasingly transmitted through social networks as a form of sharing between persons. He said this dynamic has favored dialogue, exchange, a sense of solidarity and the creation of positive relations.



"The new technologies allow people to meet each other beyond the confines of space and of their own culture, creating in this way an entirely new world of potential friendships," he said.



The pope added that digital communication has built-in limits, including the one-sidedness of the interaction and "the tendency to communicate only some parts of one's interior world." The creation of an artificial online image instead of an authentic one "can become a form of self-indulgence," he said.



The great potential of social networks for building relationships makes it a natural place for the church to be present, he said. But there is a "Christian way" of being online -- through communication that is "honest and open, responsible and respectful of others," he said.



Archbishop Claudio Celli, president of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, was asked in a briefing with reporters whether the pope's words reflected concern over an aggressive and derisive approach found on some Catholic sites and blogs.



"The risk is there, there is no doubt," the archbishop said. He added that his council was working on a document that would offer, among other things, some reference points about the appropriate tone and behavior for church-related Internet sites.



Pope Benedict's message, while underlining the risks of the Internet, was generally positive about online opportunities, saying they had opened new "spiritual horizons."



He said proclaiming the Gospel through new media was not simply a matter of inserting religious content into online platforms, but also of witnessing the Gospel consistently when communicating choices, preferences and judgments.



This witness, he said, can and should challenge some ways of thinking that are typical of websites -- for one thing, he said, the truth Christians want to share is not based on its popularity or the amount of attention it receives.



The pope said the Gospel should be presented online not as a consumer item, but as daily nourishment. That requires communication that is "respectful and sensitive, which stimulates the heart and moves the conscience," he said.



In their online activities, he added, Christians also need to remember that direct human relations remain fundamental for transmission of the faith.



"Even when it is proclaimed in the virtual space of the Web, the Gospel demands to be incarnated in the real world and linked to the real faces of our brothers and sisters," he said.



The pope said that believers can help prevent the web from becoming an instrument that "depersonalizes people, attempts to manipulate them emotionally or allows those who are powerful to monopolize the opinions of others."



Commenting on that passage, Archbishop Celli said one example of manipulation was when social network users are unwittingly tracked for marketing purposes.



While Pope Benedict's message spoke of the "wonders" of new online possibilities, Vatican officials agreed that the pope himself doesn't use new media much. Asked if the pope personally surfs the Internet, Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman, said: "To be very honest, I would say no."



The pope still writes with a pen, Father Lombardi said. But he added that the 83-year-old pontiff fully recognizes the opportunities offered by the new technologies, and has encouraged Vatican departments to move forward on digital projects.



END
Read more at www.catholicnews.com
 

Catholic abuse victims offered firm payout

Amplify’d from www.thelocal.de

Catholic abuse victims offered firm payout

Photo: DPA

Victims of sex abuse at Jesuit schools are finally being offered concrete compensation payouts one year after the abuse scandal was revealed, a Catholic official said Monday.

Klaus Mertes, rector of Canisius College, the elite Jesuit school in Berlin at which the first allegations surfaced, told daily Berliner Zeitung’s Monday edition that the 205 known victims would share about €1 million in damages payments, meaning each will receive roughly €5,000.



The figure was immediately rejected as insufficient by a victims’ group.



The onslaught of revelations of sex abuse within the Catholic Church began in January 2010 when it emerged that priests at Canisius committed dozens of sexual assaults on pupils in the 1970s and 1980s.



Mertes told the paper that the church would “finalise the precise sums and carry out he payment of probably about €1 million in total.”



Matthias Katsch of the group Eckiger Tisch, which represents victims, said the sum was disappointing and in no way adequate.



Mertes himself revealed the scandal a year ago. After writing to former students of the college to alert them to the fact that former teachers were being investigated for abuse, he then held a press conference to announce the discovery.



Sexual abuse allegations at other Catholic schools began to surface and quickly turned into a flood of claims.
Read more at www.thelocal.de
 

Experts say Fairfield U avoids black eye in Perlitz scandal

Amplify’d from www.stamfordadvocate.com

Experts say Fairfield U avoids black eye in Perlitz scandal

Michael P. Mayko, Staff Writer

Take an honored graduate, a respected Jesuit priest and a humanitarian program funded with nearly a million dollars to assist homeless Haitian boys.


Then add a sex scandal, an international investigation, a federal conviction and $120,500 in unaccounted expenses.


It's the recipe for a public relations' nightmare.


Except crisis experts, school alumni and some professors believe Fairfield University properly handled the issues involving Douglas Perlitz, a 1992 graduate and 2002 commencement speaker; and the Rev. Paul Carrier, the school's former chaplain and director of campus ministry and their Project Pierre Toussaint humanitarian effort in Haiti.


Perlitz pleaded guilty to sexually abusing some of his students and was sentenced Dec. 21 to 19 years and eight months in federal prison. Carrier, who has not been charged with a crime, has been suspended by the Society of Jesus, which is investigating his relationship with students.


"It's obviously an embarrassment," said David Bartlett, a senior vice president and public relations crisis consultant at Levick Strategic Communications in Washington, D.C. "How you handle it makes all the difference."


Babak "Bobby" Zafarnia, president of Praecere Public Relations, also in Washington, said Fairfield has been out in front of the scandal.


"In the last three years, the school has released three statements expressing concern, acknowledging financial controls could have been better and committing to help the victims," Zafarnia said. "That's more than most institutions do."


Twardy's hiring praised


Zafarnia also commended the school for hiring attorney Stanley A. Twardy Jr. to oversee an internal audit of the missing funds. Twardy served nearly two terms as the state's chief federal prosecutor and later as consul to a governor.


"When you hire an attorney with that kind of background who has a lot of respect in the legal community, that goes a long way in creating credibility," Zafarnia said.


The audit was unable to determine how $120,500 of the $775,000 raised by the Fairfield University community for Perlitz' Project Pierre Toussaint was spent.


As a result, Twardy's team recommended proposals, which Fairfield adopted, that included calling for a second level of approval for financial advances and wiring or writing checks directly to the charity for which the donations were collected.


Now the school has retained Twardy to look into Carrier's actions at the school and Perlitz's claims that he had been "physically and spiritually" abused by an unnamed campus priest.


In the meantime, the school has pledged to financially support a program developed by Kids Alive International to provide schooling, job training, meals and clothing to the 82 students displaced by the closing of the residential school in Perlitz's program.


Both Zafarnia and Bartlett agree that the public and the media will be watching to see if the school lives up to this promise.


"Once they start taking actual concrete steps they need to announce that boldly," Zafarnia said. But some said Fairfield University took too long to help the Haitian boys. Fairfield just last month announced it was negotiating with Kids Alive International.


The critics weigh in


Paul Kendrick, a 1972 graduate and advocate for victims of clergy sexual abuse, criticizes the school for preaching a Jesuit education yet doing little to help the Haitian victims who were thrown back onto the street when a lack of funding closed Perlitz's project during the summer of 2009.


"When the first whiff of scandal raised its ugly head, Fairfield University, the Jesuits of New England and the Order of Malta quickly scrambled to create as much distance as possible between them and the school in Haiti"when they could have used their bully pulpits to keep the school open and the boys cared for," he said. --I can't tell you how many e-mails I sent to (Fairfield President Jeffrey) von Arx advising him that the victims need help, they need counseling, they need food."


What they did, Kendrick said, is the same thing Perlitz had threatened to do to the victims if they went public -- "toss them back onto the streets."


Following an Oct. 23, 2010 homecoming week demonstration at the University entrance, Kendrick got a brief audience with von Arx.


"There I was begging and pleading with the Jesuit Catholic priest for assistance in providing food, shelter, clothing and school payments for just 20 boys who were raped and sodomized by Perlitz...But not once during the meeting did von Arx lean over and ask me how the boys were doing," Kendrick said.


Fairfield University vice president of marketing Rama Sudhakar said the university was searching for an organization it could work with to help the boys.


Several sources attributed the delay to finding an organization familiar with Haiti willing to take on this project in the wake of all the other issues facing that country including the devastating January, 2010 earthquake, an ineffective government and almost non-existent paved roadway system.


help to the Haitians


Michael McCooey, the chairman of the Haiti Fund, which raised the majority of money for Perlitz's project through charitable events, helped put Fairfield in touch with Kids Alive, which has an organization in place in Haiti and employs Robenson Gedeus, a former PPT supervisor.


"We worked hard over the past year to find an organization on the ground in Haiti that could provide sustainable help for the boys," said Sudhakar. "We're pleased that the University along with the Order of Malta and other partners is now working with Kids Alive International...They're expanding their work in Cap-Haitien in order to care for the PPT boys and provide them with meals, medical attention, tutoring and counseling."


Some say there should have been more of an outcry about the scandal.


Experts say the muted public outcry may stem from the fact that the public is numb to clergy abuse cases. That there have been so many cases -- particularly in the Bridgeport Catholic Diocese over the years -- may have actually helped Fairfield University, experts say. Also, the international distance of the victims may have stemmed some of the outrage.


Mike Paul, who bills himself as "the Reputation Doctor" as head of MGP and Associates, a public relations strategy firm in New York, believes more attention would have been paid if the victims were "blonde, blue-eyed" kids from Fairfield County and not homeless, abandoned blacks from Haiti.


Paul said if the Board of Trustees did not call an emergency meeting once this scandal broke and immediately contacted law enforcement "that would be an abomination."


Whether or not Fairfield University called an emergency meeting of its Board of Trustees once the scandal broke is unknown. E-mails and telephone calls to several board members were not returned. Soon after Perlitz's September, 2009, the school did say it was cooperating with law enforcement.


Ethan Fry, a 2004 Fairfield University graduate, editor of the school newspaper and former Danbury News Times reporter who is now a law student, questioned the delay in investigating Carrier's role, involvement with students and spending practices.


"While the new probe (into Carrier's involvement with students) is to be commended, it's stunning to me that they waited so long-again-and pursued it only after the braying protestations of a serial rapist, not after a very competent law firm uncovered possible wrongdoing by a former official. Of course sexual misconduct is far graver than financial misconduct," said Fry, now a law school student.


Some alumni like Frank Riccio II, a local defense lawyer, Thomas McCarthy, Bridgeport City Council president and Angel DePara Jr., a Bridgeport councilman, believe their alma mater weathered the storm well.


"Whenever a university is placed in a bad light it is a cause for concern," said Riccio. "What Fairfield didn't do is rush to judgment like Duke University in the wake of their lacrosse scandal."


In 2006, Duke suspended its lacrosse program and forced the coach to resign after three players were arrested on charges of raping a stripper. The allegations were found to be false.


"That blemish will forever stain Duke's reputation," Riccio believes.


DePara admits what happened at Project Pierre Toussaint was terrible "but I can't see it washing away decades of good service" Fairfield University has provided.


McCarthy said Fairfield erred by relying "on just one priest (Carrier) to oversee the Fairfield contribution to the mission...I think in the future you will see that the University will be much more careful about going all in with a charity without having the proper monitoring."

Read more at www.stamfordadvocate.com
 

Experts say Fairfield U avoids black eye in Perlitz scandal

Amplify’d from www.stamfordadvocate.com

Experts say Fairfield U avoids black eye in Perlitz scandal

Michael P. Mayko, Staff Writer

Take an honored graduate, a respected Jesuit priest and a humanitarian program funded with nearly a million dollars to assist homeless Haitian boys.


Then add a sex scandal, an international investigation, a federal conviction and $120,500 in unaccounted expenses.


It's the recipe for a public relations' nightmare.


Except crisis experts, school alumni and some professors believe Fairfield University properly handled the issues involving Douglas Perlitz, a 1992 graduate and 2002 commencement speaker; and the Rev. Paul Carrier, the school's former chaplain and director of campus ministry and their Project Pierre Toussaint humanitarian effort in Haiti.


Perlitz pleaded guilty to sexually abusing some of his students and was sentenced Dec. 21 to 19 years and eight months in federal prison. Carrier, who has not been charged with a crime, has been suspended by the Society of Jesus, which is investigating his relationship with students.


"It's obviously an embarrassment," said David Bartlett, a senior vice president and public relations crisis consultant at Levick Strategic Communications in Washington, D.C. "How you handle it makes all the difference."


Babak "Bobby" Zafarnia, president of Praecere Public Relations, also in Washington, said Fairfield has been out in front of the scandal.


"In the last three years, the school has released three statements expressing concern, acknowledging financial controls could have been better and committing to help the victims," Zafarnia said. "That's more than most institutions do."


Twardy's hiring praised


Zafarnia also commended the school for hiring attorney Stanley A. Twardy Jr. to oversee an internal audit of the missing funds. Twardy served nearly two terms as the state's chief federal prosecutor and later as consul to a governor.


"When you hire an attorney with that kind of background who has a lot of respect in the legal community, that goes a long way in creating credibility," Zafarnia said.


The audit was unable to determine how $120,500 of the $775,000 raised by the Fairfield University community for Perlitz' Project Pierre Toussaint was spent.


As a result, Twardy's team recommended proposals, which Fairfield adopted, that included calling for a second level of approval for financial advances and wiring or writing checks directly to the charity for which the donations were collected.


Now the school has retained Twardy to look into Carrier's actions at the school and Perlitz's claims that he had been "physically and spiritually" abused by an unnamed campus priest.


In the meantime, the school has pledged to financially support a program developed by Kids Alive International to provide schooling, job training, meals and clothing to the 82 students displaced by the closing of the residential school in Perlitz's program.


Both Zafarnia and Bartlett agree that the public and the media will be watching to see if the school lives up to this promise.


"Once they start taking actual concrete steps they need to announce that boldly," Zafarnia said. But some said Fairfield University took too long to help the Haitian boys. Fairfield just last month announced it was negotiating with Kids Alive International.


The critics weigh in


Paul Kendrick, a 1972 graduate and advocate for victims of clergy sexual abuse, criticizes the school for preaching a Jesuit education yet doing little to help the Haitian victims who were thrown back onto the street when a lack of funding closed Perlitz's project during the summer of 2009.


"When the first whiff of scandal raised its ugly head, Fairfield University, the Jesuits of New England and the Order of Malta quickly scrambled to create as much distance as possible between them and the school in Haiti"when they could have used their bully pulpits to keep the school open and the boys cared for," he said. --I can't tell you how many e-mails I sent to (Fairfield President Jeffrey) von Arx advising him that the victims need help, they need counseling, they need food."


What they did, Kendrick said, is the same thing Perlitz had threatened to do to the victims if they went public -- "toss them back onto the streets."


Following an Oct. 23, 2010 homecoming week demonstration at the University entrance, Kendrick got a brief audience with von Arx.


"There I was begging and pleading with the Jesuit Catholic priest for assistance in providing food, shelter, clothing and school payments for just 20 boys who were raped and sodomized by Perlitz...But not once during the meeting did von Arx lean over and ask me how the boys were doing," Kendrick said.


Fairfield University vice president of marketing Rama Sudhakar said the university was searching for an organization it could work with to help the boys.


Several sources attributed the delay to finding an organization familiar with Haiti willing to take on this project in the wake of all the other issues facing that country including the devastating January, 2010 earthquake, an ineffective government and almost non-existent paved roadway system.


help to the Haitians


Michael McCooey, the chairman of the Haiti Fund, which raised the majority of money for Perlitz's project through charitable events, helped put Fairfield in touch with Kids Alive, which has an organization in place in Haiti and employs Robenson Gedeus, a former PPT supervisor.


"We worked hard over the past year to find an organization on the ground in Haiti that could provide sustainable help for the boys," said Sudhakar. "We're pleased that the University along with the Order of Malta and other partners is now working with Kids Alive International...They're expanding their work in Cap-Haitien in order to care for the PPT boys and provide them with meals, medical attention, tutoring and counseling."


Some say there should have been more of an outcry about the scandal.


Experts say the muted public outcry may stem from the fact that the public is numb to clergy abuse cases. That there have been so many cases -- particularly in the Bridgeport Catholic Diocese over the years -- may have actually helped Fairfield University, experts say. Also, the international distance of the victims may have stemmed some of the outrage.


Mike Paul, who bills himself as "the Reputation Doctor" as head of MGP and Associates, a public relations strategy firm in New York, believes more attention would have been paid if the victims were "blonde, blue-eyed" kids from Fairfield County and not homeless, abandoned blacks from Haiti.


Paul said if the Board of Trustees did not call an emergency meeting once this scandal broke and immediately contacted law enforcement "that would be an abomination."


Whether or not Fairfield University called an emergency meeting of its Board of Trustees once the scandal broke is unknown. E-mails and telephone calls to several board members were not returned. Soon after Perlitz's September, 2009, the school did say it was cooperating with law enforcement.


Ethan Fry, a 2004 Fairfield University graduate, editor of the school newspaper and former Danbury News Times reporter who is now a law student, questioned the delay in investigating Carrier's role, involvement with students and spending practices.


"While the new probe (into Carrier's involvement with students) is to be commended, it's stunning to me that they waited so long-again-and pursued it only after the braying protestations of a serial rapist, not after a very competent law firm uncovered possible wrongdoing by a former official. Of course sexual misconduct is far graver than financial misconduct," said Fry, now a law school student.


Some alumni like Frank Riccio II, a local defense lawyer, Thomas McCarthy, Bridgeport City Council president and Angel DePara Jr., a Bridgeport councilman, believe their alma mater weathered the storm well.


"Whenever a university is placed in a bad light it is a cause for concern," said Riccio. "What Fairfield didn't do is rush to judgment like Duke University in the wake of their lacrosse scandal."


In 2006, Duke suspended its lacrosse program and forced the coach to resign after three players were arrested on charges of raping a stripper. The allegations were found to be false.


"That blemish will forever stain Duke's reputation," Riccio believes.


DePara admits what happened at Project Pierre Toussaint was terrible "but I can't see it washing away decades of good service" Fairfield University has provided.


McCarthy said Fairfield erred by relying "on just one priest (Carrier) to oversee the Fairfield contribution to the mission...I think in the future you will see that the University will be much more careful about going all in with a charity without having the proper monitoring."

Read more at www.stamfordadvocate.com
 

The Hidden Nazi Underground

Amplify’d from www.thetrumpet.com
The Hidden Nazi Underground


“We don’t understand German thoroughness,” said the founder of the Trumpet’s predecessor, the Plain Truth, Herbert W. Armstrong in May 1945. “From the very start of World War ii, they have considered the possibility of losing this second round, as they did the first—and they have carefully, methodically planned, in such eventuality, the third round—World War iii! 
Hitler has lost. This round of war, in Europe, is over. And the Nazis have now gone underground …. They plan to come back and to win on the third try.”


Mr. Armstrong said this while Germany was surrendering. He predicted Nazism would not be rooted out, and that many Nazis would have important roles in the new Germany that rose from the ashes of the old.


History has already proven Mr. Armstrong right. In 1956, he wrote, “The day that war ended, the Nazi organization went underground! Their plans for coming back have been proceeding, under cover, since 1945! Already Nazis are in many key positions—in German industry—in German education—in the new German Army!”


But the full extent of Nazi subterfuge has not been revealed until today. A slew of new studies and declassified reports show how thoroughly Nazis infiltrated the new German government.


Hiding Nazi Involvement


After the war ended, the German Foreign Ministry maintained its innocence. We didn’t help the Nazis, it protested. We didn’t like them. We simply did our jobs and nothing more.


It was a lie. In October last year, a commission of historians published an 880-page book detailing the Foreign Ministry’s cooperation with Nazism.


“The Foreign Ministry wasn’t just somehow involved in national socialism or even a hotbed of resistance, as was long claimed,” Prof. Eckart Conze, who chaired the study, told Spiegel. “From day one, it functioned as an institution of the Nazi regime and backed its politics of violence at all times. After 1945, there was a high degree of staffing continuity within the ministry, and some of its diplomats were seriously tainted.”


“The ministry contributed, as an institution, to the violent crimes of the Nazis, even including the murder of the Jews,” he continued. “In this sense, one can say that the Foreign Ministry was a criminal organization.”


Not only were these diplomats allowed to remain in office, but the German government worked to protect them from prosecution. The Foreign Ministry then went on to aid fellow Nazis; its legal team helped Germans avoid prosecution for war crimes overseas.


The Foreign Ministry’s civil servants were not the only ones to support the Nazis. The revelations about the Foreign Ministry prompted former Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück to open up the Finance Ministry’s records. The result: “The Reich’s Finance Ministry literally plundered the assets of the Jews,” said Steinbrück. “It was systematic. … The Jews were stripped of savings, assets, anything with a financial or material value.”


Prof. Hans-Peter Ullmann, who chaired the Finance Ministry study, said that at one point 30 percent of the German government was financed by stolen Jewish assets. The New York Times commented, “Plundering Jewish assets could not have been possible without an efficient civil service” (Dec. 26, 2010).


Letting Criminals Go


The German Intelligence Service, which became the bnd in 1956, also hired Nazis. Last March, it admitted that it hired 200 Nazi criminals for 15 years after World War ii.


“Some had been involved in massacres in Poland and Russia, others were Gestapo torturers; all found a berth in the West German intelligence service,” wrote the London Times (March 10, 2010).


The German secret service wasn’t the only force recruiting Nazis. The United States also protected Nazi war criminals so they would spy for it. A report published by the U.S. National Archives on December 10 shows that America lost interest in hunting down Nazis after 1946 and states that it “went to some lengths to protect certain persons from justice.” A separate Justice Department history of the era says America created a “safe haven” for Nazis.


It is no wonder, then, that both the U.S. and German intelligence agencies covered up Nazi war criminals.


Intelligence files leaked to the German Bild newspaper in January show that the German intelligence services knew where the infamous Adolf Eichmann was hiding, eight years before Israeli agents captured him and brought him to trial. The German intelligence file said he was hiding in Argentina under the name Clement. “Eichmann’s address is known to the editor of the German newspaper Der Weg in Argentina,” it stated.


“With this information one could definitely have found Eichmann in 1952, and it would be an insult to any secret service to claim that the information wasn’t sufficient,” said historian Bettina Stangneth.


The Independent reported, “German intelligence is known to be reluctant to surrender all its Eichmann documents because of fears that full disclosure would prove beyond doubt that German and Vatican officials colluded in helping him to avoid trial for war crimes and escape to Argentina” (January 10).


Another example is the “Butcher of Lyons,” Klaus Barbie. Barbie cooperated with the Americans, so they helped him flee to South America. A French court sentenced him to death for his crimes in World War ii, in absentia.


Then, in 1960, the German foreign intelligence agency recruited him as an agent in Bolivia. Spiegel reported that it did this knowing his true identity.


Warnings Ignored


America ignored Herbert Armstrong’s warnings. Too focused on Russia to worry about a resurgent Germany, it did nothing, and in many cases worse than nothing, when it came to hunting down Nazi war criminals.


The same civil and diplomatic service that supported Hitler was allowed to keep functioning. The German government absorbed old Nazis.


Now that same government is at the head of Europe. That should be a major warning to the whole world.

Read more at www.thetrumpet.com
 

Pope urges young Christians to join social networks

Amplify’d from www.t3.com

Pope urges young Christians to join social networks

Vatican target social networks to spread the word

Pope Benedict XVI has doffed his pope hat to social networking as he encouraged young Christians to join the likes of Facebook and Twitter during an announcement earlier today.

Whilst many a teenager ply their Facebook and Twitter feeds with effusive rants and scantily clad, morally questionable drunken photos, pope Benedict and the team of Vatican future proofers are hoping young Christians will use the social media outlets to praise the Lord and spread the message of the Bible.

Having warned against the dangers and risks of online communication pope Benedict announced: "I would like then to invite Christians, confidently and with an informed and responsible creativity, to join the network of relationships which the digital era has made possible.”

Following in the footsteps of many psychologist and for once encouraging the world to use protective measures whilst doing something enjoyable, his holiness encouraged his Facebook following in waiting to exercise caution when communicating online. He said:  "It is important always to remember that virtual contact cannot and must not take the place of direct human contact.”

"Entering cyberspace can be a sign of an authentic search for personal encounters with others, provided that attention is paid to avoiding dangers such as enclosing oneself in a sort of parallel existence, or excessive exposure to the virtual world."

Which person of global influence would you most like to virtually befriend via social networks? Let us know via T3’s very own Twitter and Facebook feeds.

Read more at www.t3.com
 

Beware the internet's virtual world, Pope tells young

Amplify’d from www.dailymail.co.uk

Beware the internet's virtual world, Pope tells young

Caution: Pope Benedict XVI has warned users of social network sites about the dangers of living a 'parallel life' online

Caution: Pope Benedict XVI has warned users of social network sites about the dangers of living a 'parallel life' online

The Pope yesterday warned youngsters not to choose a virtual world on the internet over real-life experiences.

He insisted they were in danger of alienation and detachment from reality by excessive use of digital media.

Although Pope Benedict XVI did not name sites such as Facebook or Twitter, he alluded to ‘sharing’, ‘friends’ and ‘profiles’ – jargon commonly used on the social networking sites.

The 83-year-old leader of the Roman Catholic Church claimed it was a mistake to seek more virtual friends than real ones when so many internet users created public profiles that were either self-indulgent or plainly false.

He also said it was wrong to always be available online but ‘less present to those whom we encounter in our everyday life’.

‘It is important to remember virtual contact must not take the place of direct human contact with people at every level of our lives,’ the Pope said.

‘In the search for sharing, for “friends”, there is the challenge to be authentic and faithful and not give in to the illusion of constructing an artificial public profile for oneself.’

He accepted, however, online social networks were now an ‘integral part of human life’ and encouraged Christians ‘confidently and with an informed and creative responsibility’ to use them to spread the Gospel.

‘The web is contributing to the development of new and more complex intellectual and spiritual horizons,’ he said. ‘In this field too we are called to proclaim our faith.’

The Pope does not have a Facebook account and is not known to surf the internet or read blogs. He also writes most of his speeches in long-hand. His comments came in a message released yesterday ahead of the 45th World Communications Day in June.

The Pope’s concerns reflect growing fears that communities are being broken down by people spending the majority of their time online.

Social network sites have also allowed paedophiles to groom children and teenagers who use the sites to chat with their friends.

The pope said that the ‘vast horizons’ of new media ‘urgently demand a serious reflection on the significance of communication in the digital age’.

He did not mention any specific social networking site or application by name, but sprinkled his message with terms such as ‘sharing,’ ‘friends,’ and ‘profiles’.

The terms are commonly used in Facebook which has an estimated 500 million users around the world.

He said social networking can help ‘dialogue, exchange, solidarity and the creation of positive relations’ but he also offered a list of warnings.

‘Entering cyberspace can be a sign of an authentic search for personal encounters with others, provided that attention is paid to avoiding dangers such as enclosing oneself in a sort of parallel existence, or excessive exposure to the virtual world,’ he said.

‘In the search for sharing, for 'friends', there is the challenge to be authentic and faithful, and not give in to the illusion of constructing an artificial public profile for oneself.’

Isolation: The pope said that virtual contact cannot replace 'real-life' friends and urged people to remember the neighbours in their physical community

Isolation: The pope said that virtual contact cannot replace 'real-life' friends and urged people to remember the neighbours in their physical community

He warned against replacing real friendships with virtual ones and the temptation to create artificial public profiles rather than authentic ones.

‘There exists a Christian way of communication which is honest and open, responsible and respectful of others,’ he wrote.

‘To proclaim the Gospel through the new media means not only to insert expressly religious content into different media platforms, but also to witness consistently, in one's own digital profile and in the way one communicates choices, preference and judgments that are fully consistent with the Gospel.’

Concern: Archbishop Claudio Cell said the Pope's message also referred to aggressive Catholic bloggers

Concern: Archbishop Claudio Cell said the Pope's message also referred to aggressive Catholic bloggers

The pope is known to write most of his speeches by hand. But under him the Holy See has greatly increased its presence online.

It has a dedicated YouTube channel, and its Pope2You.net portal gives news on the pontiff's trips and speeches and features iPhone and Facebook applications that allow users to send postcards with photos of the pope and excerpts from his messages to their friends.

In 2009, a new Vatican website went live, offering an application called ‘The pope meets you on Facebook’, and another allowing the faithful to see the Pope's speeches and messages on their iPhones or iPods.

The Vatican famously got egg on its face in 2009 when it was forced to admit that, if it had surfed the web more, it might have known that a traditionalist bishop whose excommunication was lifted had for years been a Holocaust denier.

The Pope also used the speech to reign in over-zealous Catholic bloggers who vent their anger on online and video-sharing site YouTube.

He told bloggers and Facebook and YouTube writers not to see their ultimate goal as getting as many online hits as possible.

In his annual message for the event, the pope called for the faithful to adopt a ‘Christian style presence’ online that is responsible, honest and discreet.

‘We must be aware that the truth which we long to share does not derive its worth from its 'popularity' or from the amount of attention it receives,’ he wrote. ‘

The proclamation of the Gospel requires a communication which is at once respectful and sensitive.’

Cyberspace: The Vatican in Rome has increased its online presence with a new website, a YouTube channel and a Facebook application

Cyberspace: The Vatican in Rome has increased its online presence with a new website, a YouTube channel and a Facebook application

The pope did not name anyone, but the head of the Vatican's social communications office, Archbishop Claudio Celli, said it would not be incorrect to direct his exhortation to some conservative Catholic blogs, YouTube channels and sites which, with some vehemence, criticise bishops, public officials and policies they consider not Catholic enough.

‘The risk is there, there's no doubt,’ Archbishop Celli said. He noted that the Pontifical Council for Social Communications was working on a set of guidelines with recommendations for appropriate style and behaviour for Catholics online.

‘I don't love such things, but I think we can define some points of reference for behaviour,’ he said.

Read more at www.dailymail.co.uk