ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

New Hack Turns Smartphones Into Covert Spying System

Amplify’d from www.infowars.com
Read more at www.infowars.com
Amplify’d from www.huffingtonpost.com

Amy Lee

Huffington Post

January 19, 2011

Your phone is a covert spy device, secretly listening to and recording everything you say — or at least, it could be, according to new research that has uncovered a smartphone hack affecting both Androids and iPhones.

The auto-answer feature installed on most smartphones can be hacked to transform the phone into a listening machine, based on research by Ralf-Philipp Weinmann that shows a way hackers can break into the phone’s baseband processor–which sends and receives radio signals on the cellular network–by exploiting bugs in the firmware of its radio chips.

Read more at www.huffingtonpost.com
 

Philly explosion caught on video kills 1, hurts 6

Amplify’d from www.inyork.com

Philly explosion caught on video kills 1, hurts 6

The Associated Press
PHILADELPHIA—A utility worker killed in a northeast Philadelphia gas explosion that injured six other people has been identified by the city health department as 19-year-old Mark Keeley.

Three other Philadelphia Gas Works employees were critically injured in Tuesday's blast in the Tacony neighborhood that destroyed nearby buildings and torched vehicles. A hospital spokeswoman said one remained in critical but stable condition Wednesday, but relatives had asked that no further information be released about the others.

Executive Chief Daniel Williams of the fire department says two other injured utility employees and a firefighter had been released by Wednesday evening. Williams says debris was cleared from the scene Wednesday to allow investigators to begin trying to find the cause of the blast.

Read more at www.inyork.com
 

HotAirPundit: Nancy Pelosi: I Don't Believe Those Polls That Show Americans Want Obamacare Repealed (Video)


HotAirPundit: Dramatic Video: Brazilian Man Rescued After Being Buried Alive in Mud for 16 Hours


27 of 50 States Now Challenging Constitutionality of Obamacare in Court

Amplify’d from www.cnsnews.com

27 of 50 States Now Challenging Constitutionality of Obamacare in Court
Maine Atty. Gen. William Schneider

Atty. Gen. William Schneider of Maine announced that his state has joined a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare. (AP Photo/Pat Wellenbach)

(CNSNews.com) - More than half of the states—27 out of 50—are now challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare in federal court.

Six additional states--Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Ohio, Wisconsin and Wyoming--petitioned in federal court on Tuesday to join Florida’s law suit challenging the constitutionality of the health care law President Barack Obama signed last March. Nineteen states had previously joined with Florida in this suit, making the total number of states that are now a party to the suit 26.

Virginia, which has filed its own lawsuit against Obamacare, is the 27th state challenging the constitutionality of the health-care law in federal court. (A complete list of all 27 states appears at the bottom of this story.)

Florida’s suit challenges the constitutionality of Obamacare on two grounds, arguing that the law’s mandate that individuals must buy health insurance exceeds the legitimate power granted to the federal government to regulate interstate commerce under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution and also that the mandates the law imposes on state governments to expand their Medicaid programs violates the 10th Amendment, which limits the federal government to the powers delegated to it by the Constitution.

Virginia's lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of the individual mandate.

In December, Judge Henry Hudson of the U.S. District Court in Richmond, Va., sided with Virginia in that case, ruling that the Constitution does not give the federal government the power to force individuals to buy health insurance.

The Florida-led case is currently before U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson in Pensacola, Fla. Oral arguments were held on Dec. 16.  Judge Vinson has not issued a ruling yet.

Ultimately, the cases will be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

“This lawsuit is about standing up for the rule of law and protecting the liberties guaranteed by our Constitution,” Kansas Atty. Gen. Derek Schmidt said in a statement. “Our federal government is designed to be a government of limited, enumerated powers, and we do not believe it has the power to order citizens into commerce so it can then regulate their conduct under authority of the Commerce Clause. Whatever the merits or demerits of health care reform, the ends cannot justify the unconstitutional means.”

Maine Atty. Gen. William Schneider said in statement, “The federal health care reform law mandates that all citizens to purchase health insurance or pay a costly penalty. This would be an unprecedented expansion of federal power, violating the 10th Amendment and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.”

“The federal government simply does not have the right to force someone to buy a product--be it health insurance or any other type of goods or services that an individual may or may not want – or face a penalty,” Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine said in a statement.

Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen said the “Constitution places limits on the power of the federal government, and these limits must be defended or they will disappear.

“Never before has the federal government required an individual to either buy government-approved insurance or pay a penalty,” Van Hollen continued. “And nowhere does the Constitution authorize Congress to regulate in this manner.”

The National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB), which advocates for small businesses, has also joined Florida’s suit against Obamacare.

“Having more than half of the nation’s states involved in this case along with NFIB, who represents more than 350,000 small businesses nationwide, sends a strong message to the courts that this law is detrimental to the entire nation and must be overturned,” said Karen Harned, executive director, NFIB Small Business Legal Center.

These are the 27 states now challenging Obamacare in federal: Florida, South Carolina, Nebraska, Texas, Utah, Louisiana, Alabama, Colorado, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Washington, Idaho, South Dakota, Indiana, North Dakota, Mississippi, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, Alaska, Ohio, Wisconsin, Maine, Iowa, Wyoming, Kansas and Virginia.

Read more at www.cnsnews.com
 

Transgender's request a sign of the times

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
Transgender's request a sign of the times
Chad Groening - OneNewsNow

transgender symbolA Christian attorney and pro-family activist says the controversy surrounding a "transgender" student in Texas is a perfect example of what can be expected when the full weight of the new LGBT law is implemented in the military.

Fox News recently reported on the uneasiness among a group of female students at Southwest Texas Junior College when they learned that a 51-year-old man who underwent a supposed sex change wanted to move into their dormitory. The female students said they were afraid because their potential dorm-mate is built like a man and can overpower any of them. On Friday, the school issued a news release saying it has denied his request to live on campus.

 

Matt Barber, director of cultural affairs at Liberty Counsel, says the reaction by the other students in the dorm should be expected.

 
Matt Barber"The natural and to-be-expected reaction from any reasonable person looking at this situation should be that this guy is creepy," Barber says bluntly. "It is perfectly understandable that these young women are frightened. [It] just boggles the mind."

 

Barber contends this situation illustrates why it was irresponsible for the lame-duck 111th Congress to repeal the military's homosexual exclusion law last month. "This really is a microcosm of the kinds of situations we can expect going forward as the LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] movement makes the kinds of gains they're making under this Obama administration," he laments.

 

On a more positive note, Barber is encouraged that potential 2012 GOP presidential candidate Tim Pawlenty, the former governor of Minnesota, recently said he would sign a bill to repeal the repeal -- and he is hopeful other Republican hopefuls will make a similar pledge.
Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

The hate speech inquisition

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
The hate speech inquisition
Michelle Malkin - Syndicated Columnist

Michelle Malkincolumnists archives buttonThere isn't a shred of evidence that deranged Tucson massacre suspect Jared Loughner ever listened to talk radio or cared about illegal immigration. Indeed, after 300 exhaustive interviews, the feds "remain stumped" about his motives, according to Tuesday's Washington Post. But that hasn't stopped a coalition of power-grabbing politicians, progressive activists, and open-borders lobbyists from plying their quack cure for the American body politic: government-sponsored speech suppression.

In the immediate aftermath of the shooting rampage, Democratic leaders mused openly about reintroducing the Orwellian "Fairness Doctrine" -- a legislative sledgehammer targeting conservative viewpoints on public airwaves. New York Democratic Rep. Louise Slaughter assailed the Federal Communications Commission for failing to police broadcast content and vowed to "look into" more aggressive language monitoring. Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Ed Markey blamed "incendiary rhetoric" for triggering "unstable individuals to take violent action." In his own manifesto calling for resurrection of the Fairness Doctrine, Democratic Rep. James Clyburn pressed public officials to "rethink parameters on free speech."

 

This week's fashionable new media meme is to deride talk radio hosts for taking these speech-squelching threats seriously. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Jay Bookman sneered at the "persecution complex" of conservative broadcasters who reacted to Slaughter and company. Politico's Keach Hagey dismissed concerns about the Democrats' chilling campaign against right-leaning media outlets and knocked conservative talkers' "defensive posture." (Sound familiar? This is the same tactic they used against Sarah Palin and all those on the right falsely accused of being accessories to the Tucson massacre: Attack 'em. Attack 'em for responding. Accuse the smear victims of playing the victim card. Repeat.)

 

Make no mistake: The Hate Speech Inquisition is real. And it's being fought on all fronts. Last week, using the non-radio-inspired Tucson massacre as fuel, the National Hispanic Media Coalition called on the FCC to gather evidence for the left's preconceived conclusion that conservative talk radio "hate speech" causes violence. It's Red Queen science -- sentence first, research validation later.

 

The head of the NHMC is Alex Nogales, who has filed more than 50 petitions to deny broadcast licenses and has led anti-corporate crusades to "force" broadcast stations across the country "to hire Latino reporters and anchors" and adopt "diversity initiatives." Grabbing the Tucson shooting limelight, Nogales told Broadcasting & Cable magazine last week:

"We can't stand there with our arms crossed and make like there isn't a reason why this is happening....We started this dialog(ue) in the last immigration debate four years ago. We could see that it was just out of control. It started with just an issue of immigration, then every pundit on radio and TV who wanted an audience started talking about it and started using the worst of language, and now it has spilled out into mainstream."

Loughner's wild Internet rants and creepy campus meltdowns clearly demonstrate that crazy doesn't need a motive. But progressive censors need their bogeymen, and Nogales isn't about to give them up for reality's sake. The NHMC first filed a petition in October 2009 demanding that the FCC collect data, seek public comment, and "explore options" for combating "hate speech" from staunch critics of illegal immigration. The petition followed on National Council of La Raza president Janet Murguia's call for media outlets to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the airwaves "even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights."

 

Nogales' group is part of a larger "media justice" coalition dedicated to curtailing and redistributing conservatives' political speech under the guise of diversity and decency. As left-wing philanthropists at the Media Justice Fund put it: The movement "is grounded in the belief that social and economic justice will not be realized without the equitable redistribution and control of media and communication technologies." But, hey, we better just ignore these communications control freaks lest we be accused of suffering a "persecution complex."

 

The Praetorian Guards of civility keep telling us that "words matter." Threats should be taken seriously, they insist. Except, of course, when those words and threats are uttered by those hell-bent on regulating their opponents' discourse out of existence.

Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

Gov't takeover Obama's objective?

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
Gov't takeover Obama's objective?
Becky Yeh - OneNewsNow California correspondent

Pres. Obama wavingA pro-family group working to repeal ObamaCare believes President Obama's ultimate goal is to bring the American people under government control.

As Republicans began their challenge to repeal the healthcare overhaul, the Obama administration released a report detailing how repeal would hurt millions by making it more difficult for Americans to obtain healthcare coverage. However, Eagle Forum president Phyllis Schafly argues that ObamaCare is a disaster and is way too costly for America.


"It is a big takeover of an entire industry by the federal government, and unfortunately, I think that is one of the goals of Barack Obama," she contends.

Phyllis SchlaflySchlafly, who commented on ObamaCare during a recent tele-training conference hosted by PreserveLiberty.com (see earlier story), believes President Obama wants to take the country into a "type of European-style socialism, where the government controls everything."


"President Obama meant what he said when he said he wanted to fundamentally transform America," she assures. "And I do believe he's trying to take us into a socialist country while he's bowing to foreign dictators all over the world."



The Eagle Forum president adds that America has always had a unique system of government that attracted the world, and for that reason should continue to be an "oasis of freedom and prosperity."

Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

Pa. abortion doc charged with 8 counts of murder

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
Pa. abortion doc charged with 8 counts of murder
Patrick Walters and Maryclaire Dale - Associated Press

Associated Press logo smallAssociated Press video buttonPHILADELPHIA - A Philadelphia abortion doctor has been charged with eight counts of murder in the deaths of a woman patient and seven babies who prosecutors say were born alive and then killed with scissors. The charges against Dr. Kermit Gosnell follow a long grand jury investigation.

District Attorney Seth Williams says state regulators ignored complaints and failed to visit the clinic since 1993. Williams says the women were subjected to squalid and barbaric conditions at Gosnell's Women's Medical Society, which was shut down last year. Gosnell has been named in at least 10 malpractice suits, including one over the death of a woman who died of sepsis and a perforated uterus.

A doctor who gave abortions to minorities, immigrants and poor women in a "house of horrors" clinic was charged with eight counts of murder in the deaths of a patient and seven babies who were born alive and then killed with scissors, prosecutors said Wednesday.

Kermit GosnellDr. Kermit Gosnell, 69, made millions of dollars over 30 years, performing as many illegal, late-term abortions as he could, prosecutors said. State regulators ignored complaints about him and failed to inspect his clinic since 1993, but no charges were warranted against them given time limits and existing law, District Attorney Seth Williams said. Nine of Gosnell's employees also were charged.

Gosnell "induced labor, forced the live birth of viable babies in the sixth, seventh, eighth month of pregnancy and then killed those babies by cutting into the back of the neck with scissors and severing their spinal cord," Williams said.

Patients were subjected to squalid and barbaric conditions at Gosnell's Women's Medical Society, where Gosnell performed dozens of abortions a day, prosecutors said. He mostly worked overnight hours after his untrained staff administered drugs to induce labor during the day, they said.

Early last year, authorities went to investigate drug-related complaints at the clinic and stumbled on what Williams called a "house of horrors." Bags and bottles holding aborted fetuses "were scattered throughout the building," Williams said. "There were jars, lining shelves, with severed feet that he kept for no medical purpose."

The clinic was shut down and Gosnell's medical license was suspended after the raid.

Gosnell and four workers were charged with murder, while five others were charged with controlled drug violations and other crimes. None of the employees had any medical training, and one, a high school student, performed intravenous anesthesia with potentially lethal narcotics, Williams said.

All 10 defendants were taken into custody, authorities said.

West Philadelphia abortuary (Feb. 2010)Two listed numbers for Gosnell in Philadelphia have been disconnected. Defense lawyer William J. Brennan, who represented Gosnell during the investigation, noted that the doctor served patients in a low-income city neighborhood for decades. "Obviously, these allegations are very, very serious," Brennan said.

The grand jury said the woman who died was a patient who came to Gosnell's clinic for an abortion and died of cardiac arrest because she was given too much Demerol. Gosnell wasn't at the clinic at the time, but directed his staff to administer the drug to keep the woman, a healthy 41-year-old woman, sedated until he arrived, prosecutors said.

Gosnell has been named in at least 46 malpractice suits, including one over the death of a 22-year-old mother who died of sepsis and a perforated uterus in 2000. Many others also involve perforated uteruses. Gosnell sometimes sewed up the injury without telling women their uteruses had been perforated, prosecutors said.

Gosnell charged $325 for first-trimester abortions and $1,600 to $3,000 for abortions up to 30 weeks. Abortions are legal up to 24 weeks gestation in Pennsylvania, although most doctors won't perform them after 20 weeks, prosecutors said.

Some women came from across the mid-Atlantic for the illegal late-term abortions, authorities said. White women from the suburbs were ushered into a separate, slightly cleaner area because Gosnell believed they were more likely to file complaints, Williams said.

"People knew near and far that if you needed a late-term abortion you could go see Dr. Gosnell," Williams said.

Few if any of the sedated women knew their babies were born alive and then killed, prosecutors said. Many were first-time mothers who were told they were 24 weeks pregnant, even if they were further along, authorities said.

Gosnell got his medical degree from Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia and is board certified in family practice. He started, but did not finish, a residency in obstetrics-gynecology, authorities said.

"He does not know how to do an abortion. He's not board certified," Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore said. "Once he got them there, he saw dollar signs and did abortions that other people wouldn't do."

What's your initial reaction to this gruesome story?

Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

Revelations of Torture Spur Wife of Chinese Lawyer to Action

Amplify’d from www.compassdirect.org

Revelations of Torture Spur Wife of Chinese Lawyer to Action


Christian human rights advocate Gao Zhisheng reveals further abuse.



Geng He, wife of Christian lawyer Gao Zhisheng, fled China with her children after her son and daughter began to suffer harassment.

Geng He, wife of Christian lawyer Gao Zhisheng, fled China with her children after her son and daughter began to suffer harassment.
(Photo: CAA)
DUBLIN, January 19 (CDN) —
Geng He, wife of missing Christian lawyer Gao Zhisheng, is demanding answers from the Chinese government following new revelations of torture of her husband.


“This is the first time that I heard about the details,” Geng, now living in the United States, told Radio Free Asia last week. “My husband did not tell me – would not tell me – how he was tortured.”


After consulting with Geng, The Associated Press (AP) on Jan. 10 published an interview with Gao, an outspoken human rights campaigner, during his brief release from captivity last April, in which he revealed details of the torture he had suffered during the previous 14 months.


Speaking with the AP in a Beijing teahouse on April 7, closely watched by police, Gao described many forms of torture, including a period of 48 hours when he was stripped bare, beaten continually with handguns and subjected to other excruciating abuse.


The AP released the interview in advance of an official visit this week (Jan. 18-21) by Chinese President Hu Jintao to the United States, stating its hope that “publicizing his account will place renewed pressure on the government to disclose Gao’s whereabouts.”


Geng planned to travel to Washington this week to further highlight her husband’s case. At a U.S. State Department dinner at the White House tonight for Hu, she planned to wait outside to draw attention to Gao’s disappearance.


Gao had asked that his account not be made public unless he disappeared again or “made it to someplace safe like the U.S. or Europe,” according to the AP.


Initially seized by public security officials on Feb. 4, 2009, shortly after his wife and two children fled China to seek asylum in the United States, Gao was held virtually incommunicado for more than a year before police staged his brief reappearance in Beijing last April 6. (See www.compassdirect.org, “Christian Rights Activist Gao Zhisheng Released,” April 9, 2010.)


After speaking with the AP and other journalists, Gao made a supervised visit to his in-laws in northwestern Xinjiang Province. During that visit, he again vanished on April 20 while in the company of Chinese police, according to a report by The New York Times on April 30, 2009. He has not been seen or heard from since, but China watchers such as Bob Fu of the China Aid Association (CAA) believe he is “definitely in the hands of Chinese security forces.” (See www.compassdirect.org, “Human Rights Lawyer Gao Zhisheng Missing Again,” May 7, 2010.)


New Account
In his interview with the AP, Gao explained that police had moved him from his birthplace of Yulin to Beijing, then back to Yulin, and from there to Urumqi, where the most excruciating moments of torture occurred.


Allowed out on an evening walk on Sept. 25, Gao was approached by several Uyghur men, members of a minority ethnic group who claimed to be part of a counterterrorism unit. They punched him in the stomach, handcuffed him and took him to the upstairs room of a building. There they tortured him for a full week, culminating in a period of 48 hours when they stripped him bare and “took turns beating him [with pistols] and did things he refused to describe,” the AP reported.


Gao said this was the darkest point in the 14 months since authorities had seized him in February 2009, and far worse than the torture during a previous disappearance in 2007. At that time, he said in a previous report, security officials gave electric shocks to his genitals and held burning cigarettes close to his eyes to cause temporary blindness.


When Gao in 2007 asked Beijing police why they didn’t put him in prison, they replied, “You’re not good enough for that. Whenever we want you to disappear, you’ll disappear,” according to the AP.


‘Words from the Heart’
Fu of CAA on Friday (Jan. 14) also called on the Chinese government to give an account of Gao’s whereabouts, besides imploring President Obama to address the fate of Gao and other prominent Chinese rights defenders during his meetings with Hu.


Fu also released a previously unpublished statement written by Gao on Jan. 1, 2009, shortly before his family’s escape from China, entitled “Words from the Heart.”


Carried out of China by Gao’s wife, the document claimed that authorities had invested a huge amount of manpower, physical resources and funds to silence him.


“Not only is it now extremely difficult for me to make my voice heard, but it is also extremely dangerous,” Gao wrote.


His faith, however, had enabled him to endure under pressure, he stated.


“I am optimistic by nature, and I am a Christian,” he wrote. “Even when I was tortured to near death, the pain was only in the physical body. A heart that is filled with God has no room to entertain pain and suffering.”

Gao expressed concern for his wife and children, who had suffered greatly from police harassment. He said authorities even banned his daughter from attending school, another factor prompting the family’s flight to the United States.


Gao urged friends both inside and outside China to defend other human rights advocates imprisoned or harassed by the government, adding that “Heroes like Guo Feixiong … who sacrifice and risk their lives to defend religious freedom, are the true hope of China.”


He also urged that a network be established within China to report on “countless” abuses of human rights.


“The publication of this article will cause me to be kidnapped again,” Gao concluded. “Kidnappings are a normal part of my life now. If it comes again, then let it come!”


SIDEBAR

A Brief Biography of Gao Zhisheng

Gao was born in a hillside cave in Yulin, northern China, according to a brief biography written by David Kilgour of Media With Conscience (MWC). Since his parents were too poor to send him to school, he gained a basic education by listening outside the windows of the village classroom.


He then worked briefly as a coal miner before joining the People’s Liberation Army, where he met his future wife, Geng He, obtained a secondary education and became a member of the Communist Party.


Following his discharge from the army, Gao became a street vendor and self-studied to become a lawyer, passing the bar exam in 1994. China’s Ministry of Justice in 2001 named him one of the country’s 10 most remarkable lawyers, according to the MWC biography.


But as Gao began to represent farmers in land compensation cases, practitioners of the banned Falun Gong group and house church members, he quickly lost favor with authorities.


In 2005, after Gao wrote open letters to President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao calling for an end to the torture and execution of Falun Gong members, authorities closed down Gao’s law firm, revoked his license to practice law, and placed Gao, his wife and two children under 24-hour police surveillance, according to reports by the China Aid Association (CAA). Police even beat his then 13-year-old daughter, according to the CAA.


In response, Gao in December 2005 publicly resigned from the Communist Party and later declared that he was a Christian.


Weeks later, on Feb. 4, 2006, Gao and several other high profile Chinese activists launched a “Relay Hunger Strike for Human Rights,” in which ordinary Chinese citizens fasted for 24 hours in rotation across 29 provinces in China. The hunger strikes led to a wave of arrests.


Authorities then seized Gao on Aug. 15, 2006, and on Dec. 22, 2006 they gave him a three-year suspended sentence for subversion. Officials then placed Gao on probation for five years and allowed him to remain at home under strict surveillance.


Authorities again seized Gao in September 2007 after he wrote to the U.S. Congress expressing concern about human rights violations prior to the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. On his release in November 2007 Gao issued a statement via the CAA claiming that his captors had tortured him by applying electric shocks to his genitals and holding burning cigarettes close to his eyes. He added that he’d been threatened with death if he spoke about the torture.


Gao was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, 2008 and 2010 in recognition of his ongoing commitment to the advance of human rights in China, according to Kilgour’s report.


State agents abducted Gao on Feb. 4, 2009, shortly after his wife and children fled China to obtain asylum in the United States, and they held him virtually incommunicado for over a year. (See www.compassdirect.org, “Action Urged for Missing Rights Activist in China,” March 24, 2009.)


Perhaps as a response to international pressure, police staged a brief reappearance for Gao on April 6, 2010, CAA reported. But on April 20, during a closely-supervised visit to his in-laws in Urumqi, Xinjiang province, Gao again vanished and has not been seen or heard from since.


Chinese officials at every level have consistently denied knowledge of his current location.


END
Read more at www.compassdirect.org
 

Police 'Strike Force' Shoots Man Armed with Golf Club Over His Roommate's Drugs

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Police 'Strike Force' Shoots Man Armed with Golf Club Over His Roommate's DrugsIn September, a "Narcotics Strike Force" burst into the Utah home of 45-year-old Todd Blair. Blair, "armed" with a golf club, was shot within seconds. Police found "paraphernalia" and an empty vial of meth. Here's video of the raid.

Warning: A man gets shot and killed in this video. Watch at your own discretion.

As you can see in the video, police enter the house and are confronted with Blair, holding a golf club in his hands. Within seconds—and without a warning—shots are fired and Blair drops to the ground.

Blair's family says he was a drug addict but never a dealer. Police informants said they'd seen Blair sell drugs, but no investigators witnessed any transactions. Either way, the warrant on Blair's house was served as part of an investigation focused not on Blair, but on his former roommate Melanie Chournous—who police knew had moved out. An attempt to detain Blair so he wouldn't be in the house was badly botched when police pulled over the wrong person. (Police didn't bring the warrant to the house, either, not that it mattered in the end.)

The officer who shot Blair, Sgt. Troy Burnett, explained the shooting by saying "He had some silver thing. ... I thought it was a sword or something... It was silverish and thin. I didn't think about saying words. I just thought about not getting hit, or slashed or whatever." He admits that he didn't think Blair was moving toward him.

The shooting was declared "legally justified," but Blair's family is now planning a lawsuit over the shooting. It's hard to see why they shouldn't.


Send an email to Max Read, the author of this post, at max@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

George Lucas Thinks the World Will End in 2012

Amplify’d from gawker.com

George Lucas Thinks the World Will End in 2012





George Lucas Thinks the World Will End in 2012What's Star Wars creator/destroyer George Lucas wrong about these days? According to Seth Rogen, who met with Lucas recently: "Lucas [talked] for... 25 minutes about how he thinks the world is gonna end in the year 2012, like, for real."





Send an email to Max Read, the author of this post, at max@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

This Man Stabbed Four People for Making Fun of His Farts

Amplify’d from gawker.com

This Man Stabbed Four People for Making Fun of His FartsWhy did 21-year-old Marc Higgins of Bristol, Conn. stab four people at a party? Partly because he was "very drunk." And partly because of his farts.

Higgins was apparently in the midst of an intestinal "situation" on Saturday night when he arrived at a house party in Bristol—a bad-enough situation that another party guest, in the words of the Courant, "chastised him for being flatulent" and then slapped him in the face. Higgins left the party, as any of us would. But 45 minutes later, he came back:


Marc Higgins, who was described by witnesses as being "very drunk," stormed out of the party, came back armed with three knives and started stabbing people indiscriminately, according to court documents released Monday.


Three knives! Higgins reportedly "wanted to teach people that they shouldn't trifle with him." That lesson seems to have been learned. One of his victims—who Higgins said was a friend—died of his wounds, but, luckily, the other three have all been released from the hospital. Higgins is currently being held on a $2 million bond and will face trial in New Britain.


Send an email to Max Read, the author of this post, at max@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Drug Smuggling Pigeon Arrested Outside Colombian Prison


The Case of the Christian Astronomer

Amplify’d from gawker.com

The Case of the Christian AstronomerMartin Gaskell is an astronomer who studies quasars. He's also a Christian who questions evolution. The University of Kentucky decided not to hire him at least partly because of his religious views. Now Gaskell's won a settlement over it. Good.

The University of Kentucky will pay Gaskell $125,000 to settle a religious discrimination suit he filed after they turned him down for a job as director of the UK observatory in 2007. Gaskell, a professor at the University of Nebraska, is very open about his Christian views: his favorite quote is "Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you," and he told a profiler at UN that "For me the joy of teaching courses like [Descriptive Astronomy] stems from my being a Christian and getting to explain something about God's Universe." Inside Higher Ed describes Gaskell's religious arguments (Update: Here's a link to one such paper) as an unrelated sideline to his astronomy work:


The bulk of Gaskell's published work addresses the technical aspects of black holes. But he also made a hobby of criticizing the prima facie dismissal of Biblical assertions as irrelevant to scientific theory, while advocating for a view of natural history that rejects neither the Judeo-Christian creation story nor evolution. In a document published on his personal website — which later became fodder for discussion among his would-be employers at Kentucky — Gaskell criticized both creationists and evolutionary scientists for perpetuating bad science.


A key point: no one appears to have challenged Gaskell's primary work in astronomy. No one alleged, for example, that any of his papers on quasars or black holes were compromised by his religious beliefs. Evolution vs. creationism is a question primarily of biology, not astronomy. The UK search committee considering Gaskell's hiring went and talked to the UK biology department, which raised some objections. Had Gaskell been applying for a job in biology, those objections would be relevant. But he wasn't. Furthermore, this email from a search committee member indicates that the mere possibility of bad PR—even if it was inaccurate—was enough to spook them:

The Case of the Christian Astronomer

Even if you believe in evolution and think Christians are essentially believers in myth (and why wouldn't you?), you should also be extremely wary of any tendency to make hiring decisions based on something other than qualifications for the job in question. The astronomer not hired for his religious beliefs today could easily be you tomorrow—not hired for a job you're qualified for because the search committee didn't like your taste in music, or fashion, or politics. It's tempting to say that biology and astronomy are both sciences, and therefore Gaskell's beliefs in both are fair game; but it's no more reasonable to rate an astronomer on his beliefs in biology and religion than it is to rate him on his beliefs in sociology, or political science. No Marxist economists allowed? No Rasta mathematicians? Academia would be subject to even more groupthink than it already is.


You can be our staff astronomer any time, Martin Gaskell. Just don't talk to us about anything other than quasars.





Send an email to the author of this post at Hamilton@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com