ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

The first Anglicans have received into the Roman Catholic Church under a scheme set up by Pope Benedict XVI

Amplify’d from www.telegraph.co.uk

First Anglicans are received into the Roman Catholic Church in historic service


The first Anglicans have received into the Roman Catholic Church under a
scheme set up by Pope Benedict XVI.

The first Anglicans have received into the Roman Catholic Church under a scheme set up by Pope Benedict XVI.
Pope Benedict XVI leads the New Year solemn mass in Saint Peter's Basilica at the Vatican


Priests and worshippers from around 20 Church of England parishes converted to
Catholicism on Saturday at a ceremony in Westminster Cathedral.



Three former bishops were among those confirmed at the service, which saw the
first wave of Anglicans defecting to Rome to join the Ordinariate.



The Pope introduced the structure in 2009 to welcome disillusioned Anglicans
into the Catholic fold after secret meetings were held at the Vatican with
Church of England bishops, as The Sunday Telegraph revealed a year earlier.



The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, admitted the move had put him
in “an awkward position”, but more recently he said he respected the
decisions of those who decided to leave.



While around 50 clergy are expected to defect to the Catholic Church over the
coming months, it has been predicted that thousands of traditionalist
worshippers will join the exodus, particularly if they are given no
concessions once women are made bishops.


Opposition to women bishops was one of the main reasons for the priests’
resignations from the Church of England, said Bishop Alan Hopes, the
Catholic bishop who has overseen their welcome into the Ordinariate.


More importantly, he added, “most of them have been journeying, seeking the
fullness of truth, and they found it in the Catholic Church”.


The former bishops of Fulham, Ebbsfleet and Richborough, John Broadhurst,
Andrew Burnham and Keith Newton respectively, were applauded after they
received holy communion before a packed congregation at the cathedral
yesterday.


They have been key to orchestrating the exodus from the Church of England and
advocating the Ordinariate, which they described as an “answer to their
prayers”.


Fr Broadhurst has been particularly vocal in criticising the Church, accusing
it of breaking promises to opponents of women bishops and describing it as
“vicious” and “fascist”.


Two of the bishops’ wives were also confirmed as Catholics yesterday, along
with three former Anglican nuns who were forced to take refuge in a Catholic
convent after being told to leave their house at Walsingham Abbey.


Their departure devastated the community in Walsingham, leaving four older
nuns to run the priory while the younger ones faced a period of uncertainty.


One of the nuns, Sister Wendy Renata, said she felt “fantastic” after formally
being welcomed into the Catholic Church.


“I’ve wanted to do it for years. I’ve finally done it,” she said.


In the next few weeks, the next groups of clergy and worshippers are set to be
received into the Catholic Church, which is due to announce the precise
timetable for the launch of the Ordinariate this month.


The confirmations at yesterday’s service were the first step to its
establishment in this country. All of the clergy who have resigned from the
Church of England now have to be re-ordained as the Catholic Church does not
recognise Anglican orders.


It is expected that as many as 50 clergy will be ordained by Easter as the new
structure begins to take shape, but there are likely to be many disputes in
parishes torn over whether to remain in the Church of England.


The Most Rev Vincent Nichols, the Archbishop of Westminster, said in November
that he did not feel “guilty” that some Anglican parishes would be left
without vicars.


He said the Catholic Church would provide £250,000 in start-up funding for the
Ordinariate and look to raise more money from donations and sponsors to
cover running costs.


Archbishop Williams has expressed regret at the resignations of the clergy and
warned that there will be challenges as they set up their new churches.


“I think the challenge will come in working out shared use of churches, of how
we as Anglicans 'recommend’ people and also of course there will be some
parishes without priests - so we have a practical challenge here and there,”
he said.


Earlier in the process, the Vatican published its “apostolic constitution
Anglicanorum coetibus”, allowing Anglican clergy to enter into full
communion with the Catholic Church while maintaining aspects of their
spiritual heritage.


While Catholic priests are not permitted to marry, there are a small number of
former Anglican bishops with wives, who joined the Catholic clergy post the
mid-90s.


“They were given disciplinary sanction from clerical celibacy in order to be
ordained as a Catholic priest,” Bishop Hopes said.


Commenting on how the Anglican Archbishop might feel about the arrangement,
Bishop Hopes said he understood he would be feeling unhappy.


“But I know too that he understands that we are all on a journey of faith, and
sometimes our paths take standard routes.


“And if you truly believe that you have found fullness of truth in the
Catholic Church, there is nothing you can do about it.


“You have to become a Catholic.”


A former Anglican convert himself, Bishop Hopes was received into the Catholic
Church in 1994.

Read more at www.telegraph.co.uk
 

Idolatry: Pope John Paul II statue lands in Mumbai - The Times of India

MUMBAI: A statue of the late Pope John Paul II will be installed in the compound of Holy Name Cathedral, next to the Catholic archbishop's house, at Colaba in February.



The statue, which has been sent by the Vatican, is part of a larger plan to have similar installations across the world even as the late pope is about to be canonized. A church source said the 400-kg statue had already arrived in the city but it was awaiting clearance from the Customs authorities. The statue will be installed next to the bell in the cathedral compound.



Another statue is supposed to be installed in a Catholic institution in Delhi.



Known for his leading role in known to be one of the most influential persons in the world and bringing down the Communist regime in Poland, the late pope was born Karol Jozef Wojtyla on May 18, 1920 in Poland. He became the pope in October 1978 and his tenure lasted till April, 2005. during which, the world witnessed the roll back of Communism from most of eastern Europe. Incidentally, he has been the only Polish and non-Italian pope since 1552. He passed Karol Jozef Wojtyla who later took on the name John Paul II after he become pope away on April 2, 2005.



Pope John Paul II was pope from October 1978 to April 2005 during which time he saw the roll back of communism from most of Eastern Europe. He was the only Polish Pope and was the only non Italian Pope since 1552.

The much travelled pope visited 129 countries in the world and opened the doors of the catholic church for a dialogue with the protestant churches, judaism, islam and the eastern rite churches.he however generated a controversy when he took orthodox stands on contraception and the ordination of women in the catholic church.





Church sources said that the statue of the pope will be installed next to the bell in the cathedral compound to mark the visit of pope paul vi to the city in the mid 1960's. john paul ii visited india twice during his tenure as pope, once in 1986 and again in 1992 and came out strongly against the trend among radical priests who were part of the liberation theology movement.this movement advocated the use of marxist methods for protecting the rights of the poor and the downtrodden.





Read more: Pope John Paul II statue lands in Mumbai - The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Pope-John-Paul-II-statue-lands-in-Mumbai/articleshow/7202728.cms#ixzz19rqG8vC8


Good God, Bad World, Why?

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com





Good God, Bad World, Why? SDA (10)


See more at www.youtube.com
 

Good God, Bad World, Why? SDA (10)

Transocean tries to stop another Horizon probe

Transocean tries to stop another Horizon probe

Transocean Ltd, the world's biggest offshore rig contractor, aims to stop a seventh U.S. body from investigating the accident that sank one of its rigs while causing the largest U.S.

Reuters
Transocean tries to stop another Horizon probe
Transocean tries to stop another Horizon probe Fire boat response crews battle the blazing remnants of the offshore oil rig Deepwater Horizon, off Louisiana, in this handout photograph taken on April 21, 2010 and obtained on April 22. REUTERS/U.S. Coast Guard/Handout

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Transocean Ltd, the world's biggest offshore rig contractor, aims to stop a seventh U.S. body from investigating the accident that sank one of its rigs while causing the largest U.S. offshore oil spill.

In a letter to the Chemicals Safety Board (CSB) dated December 30, Transocean lawyer Rachel Clingman repeated a request for documents as the company tries to demonstrate that the CSB lacks jurisdiction over April's Deepwater Horizon disaster.

A ruptured well led to an explosion on the Horizon, which was drilling in the Gulf of Mexico for BP Plc, and that accident ultimately sank the deepwater rig, and caused more than 4 million barrels of oil to spew into the sea.

Clingman had argued in a December 2 letter, which was released to reporters along with the latest correspondence, that the rig was not subject to CSB scrutiny because it was not a fixed source.

Clingman went on to quote Michael Bromwich, director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, as saying last month that CSB officials had acknowledged they "weren't sure that they had jurisdiction to do this investigation."

A CSB representative was unavailable for comment on Friday.

According to publications on its website, CSB investigations look into all aspects of chemical accidents, including physical causes such as equipment failure as well as inadequacies in regulations, industry standards, and safety management systems.

Probes of the Deepwater Horizon disaster have been opened by the Presidential Oil Spill Commission, the U.S. Coast Guard, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Interior's inspector general, as well as four Senate committees and five committees in the House of Representatives, Transocean said.

(Reporting by Braden Reddall, editing by Dave Zimmerman)

Read more at www.scientificamerican.com
 

Link between birth defects and weaponry possible?

Amplify’d from www.upi.com

Link between defects, weaponry possible?

FALLUJAH, Iraq, Dec. 31 (UPI) -- A rise in birth defects in the Iraqi city of Falluja could have been caused by weaponry used in U.S. assaults that took place six years ago, a report says.

The report, to be published next week in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, highlights a major rise in cancers and chronic neurological, cardiac and skeletal defects in newborns at close to 11 times higher than normal rates, The Guardian newspaper in London reported Friday.

The report focused on metals as potential contaminating agents afflicting the city, especially among pregnant mothers.

"Metals are involved in regulating genome stability," it says. "As environmental effectors, metals are potentially good candidates to cause birth defects."

There is speculation the defects are caused by depleted uranium rounds, heavily used in two large battles in the city in April and November 2004. Many military and militia forces use the rounds, containing ionising radiation.

However, scientists are split on the possible danger posed by the rounds, with some claiming they leave behind a toxic residue, while others say depleted uranium has been proven not to be a contaminant.

Other battlefield residues may also be responsible for the jump in defects, the report acknowledges.

"Many known war contaminants have the potential to interfere with normal embryonic and fetal development," it says.

Read more at www.upi.com
 

Pakistanis Rally in Support of Blasphemy Law

Amplify’d from www.nytimes.com

Pakistanis Rally in Support of Blasphemy Law

Athar Hussain/Reuters

Thousands demonstrated in Karachi and elsewhere on Friday to demand that Pakistan’s blasphemy law remain intact.

By SALMAN MASOOD


ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — A crippling strike by Islamist parties brought Pakistan to a standstill on Friday as thousands of people took to the streets, and forced businesses to close, to head off any change in the country’s blasphemy law, which rights groups say has been used to persecute minorities, especially Christians.


The law was introduced in the 1980s under the military dictatorship of Gen. Mohammad Zia ul-Haq as part of a policy of promoting Islam to unite this deeply fractious society. Many attempts to revise the law have since been thwarted by the strong opposition of religious forces, which continue to gather strength.


In fiery speeches across all major cities and towns, religious leaders warned the government on Friday against altering the law, which carries a mandatory death sentence for anyone convicted of insulting Islam.


“The president and prime minister should take the nation into confidence and assure in unequivocal terms that there will be no change in the blasphemy law under any international pressure,” Sahibzada Fazal Kareem, a religious leader and member of Parliament, said at a rally in the southern port city of Karachi, where the police fired tear gas to stop protesters from marching toward Bilawal House, one of the residences of President Asif Ali Zardari.


The governing Pakistan Peoples Party, which is struggling to keep its government coalition intact, has been conciliatory on the issue.


Syed Sumsam Ali Bokhari, the minister for information, tried to placate religious forces by assuring them that the government did not intend to amend or repeal the law. “Neither the Pakistan Peoples Party nor the government has discussed the issue to bring any amendment in the blasphemy law,” Mr. Bokhari said Thursday at a news briefing.


But such assurances failed to calm the religious parties, who issued their call on Dec. 15 for a countrywide strike.


“I call it a natural result of religious extremism that is on the rise in Pakistani society,” said Mehdi Hasan, the chairman of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, an independent rights group, while commenting on the strike.


“The liberal and democratic forces in the country have retreated so much that it has created an ideological vacuum that is now being filled by the religious extremists,” Dr. Hasan said.


The human rights commission has documented scores of cases in which men have been harassed for being Christian or for being members of the Ahmadi sect, a minority group within Islam, and then accused of blasphemy. The mere fact of being a Christian or an Ahmadi in Pakistan makes a person vulnerable to prosecution, the commission says. Often the mere accusation of blasphemy has led to murders, lynchings and false arrests.


The latest push to revise the law came after the case of Asia Bibi, a 45-year-old mother of five who was sentenced to death by a municipal court, gained prominence in November. Ms. Bibi, a Christian, was accused of blasphemy after her fellow agricultural workers grew angry when she touched their water bowl, her supporters say.


After indicating that a pardon was forthcoming, government spokespeople have recently taken a more ambiguous position and now say that Mr. Zardari can extend a pardon to someone only if the prime minister recommends it. Pope Benedict XVI has appealed for Ms. Bibi to be freed unconditionally.


Rights activists, critics and several government officials, including Salman Taseer, the governor of Punjab Province, and Sherry Rehman, a lawmaker and former information minister, have urged the government to repeal or revise the laws.


“These laws institutionalize injustice,” Ms. Rehman said. “People have to feel secure as first-class citizens of this country.”


Ms. Rehman expressed disappointment that the government had distanced itself from her proposed amendments to the law.


The general strike and protests on Friday show the power Islamists hold on the streets of Pakistan. They also contrast sharply with the campaigns by rights activists and opponents of the blasphemy laws who have vented their opposition and discontent mostly on the Internet and social networks like Facebook and Twitter. Protest rallies by rights activists have been ineffective and relatively small.


Since the 1980s, conservatism and religious extremism have been on the rise in the country, analysts say. The religious right has become extremely powerful by establishing its networks across major urban centers and small towns.


“Their agitation potential is immense,” said Rasul Baksh Rais, a political analyst who teaches at Lahore University of Management Sciences in Lahore. “Their numerical strength is not enough for electoral wins but is enough to create trouble for any government in Pakistan.”


“The government is not in a position to take any drastic step against the sensitivities of the religious right, which does not want to concede any inch, even if that is meant to save innocent lives,” Mr. Rais said.


Ms. Rehman, the former information minister, said the secular, democratic forces need not be deterred by the show of force by Islamists. “Eventually, I think we have to keep at it with the help of the civil society and media; their street power is disproportional,” she said, referring to religious parties. “The mainstream political parties need to push back and resist the religious extremists who hijack issues through street power.”


However, analysts said the huge show of force by religious parties, and even the attention local news media outlets gave them on Friday, would only embolden the religious elements in the country. The dynamic is such that “the government may not be able to make any changes in the blasphemy laws in the coming years,” Mr. Rais predicted.

Read more at www.nytimes.com
 

Maine seeks exemption from provision of health-care law

Amplify’d from www.washingtonpost.com
Maine seeks exemption from provision of health-care law
By N.C. Aizenman

Washington Post Staff Writer

Days before a key and controversial provision of the health-care law is set to take effect, Maine is the only state to have asked the Obama administration for an exemption, despite concerns expressed by at least a dozen states.



Beginning in 2011, insurers must devote at least 80 percent of the premiums they collect to medical claims or other activities that improve customers' health - leaving no more than 20 percent for the insurer's administrative costs or profits. Companies that do not spend enough on the right purposes will have to refund the difference to their customers in 2012.



Consumer advocates have hailed the new "medical loss ratio" standard as a ground-breaking protection against profiteering by insurers. But the law's drafters were concerned that it could prove too onerous for plans selling to individuals, whose customer base is less stable and healthy than those of plans serving small and large businesses. So the law permits states to request temporary adjustments of the standard from the Secretary of Health and Human Services.



According to rules issued by HHS, a state must provide data demonstrating that there is a reasonable risk that the new standard will force a critical mass of insurers to pull out of its individual market, leaving residents who cannot get insurance through their employer with little or no ability to buy it for themselves.



States can request adjustments for the next one to three years. Though technically the law allows for adjustments beyond then, it's unclear whether they would be necessary: In 2014, the law will begin requiring almost all Americans to buy insurance - providing insurers selling individual plans with a considerably healthier, more constant pool of customers.



Until then, Maine has requested that the medical loss ratio required of its individual market plans be lowered to 65 percent. State officials have also asked that the ratio be calculated using the state's own, potentially more expansive, definition of activities that can be counted as improving customers' health.



HHS officials have yet to determine that the state has provided the necessary information in its application. Once they do, it could take up to 40 days for HHS officials to decide whether the adjustment is called for.



HHS has not set a deadline by which states must request an adjustment for 2011. But according to administration officials, because the standard applies starting Jan. 1, as a practical matter, they would expect any additional states to apply as early in the new year as possible.



Jack McDermott, a spokesman for the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation, blamed his state's delay on the Obama administration.



Florida anticipates requesting an adjustment, he said. But "HHS did not issue the rules on what would be required [for the application] until Nov. 22."



McDermott added that the data state officials are now being required to gather is "voluminous" and said there was reason to worry that even if Florida is ultimately granted an adjustment, the news might not come soon enough to prevent insurers from pulling out of its individual market.



However, insurance regulators in several other states that had previously indicated they would seek waivers said HHS's timing was not a concern. Rather, they are unsure whether an adjustment is wise.



"I'm between a rock and a hard place," said Mississippi Insurance Commissioner Mike Chaney.



Chaney said he worries that if the 80 percent standard is applied, insurers will no longer pay fees to brokers who sell their plans. The broker fees are counted as an administrative expense and currently eat up a large chunk of premiums for many individual market plans.



Yet, without brokers to help consumers navigate the system, Chaney said, "you have consumers trying to buy a health-insurance policy that they might not truly understand, and they may not get the coverage that they actually need."



However, Chaney said, the individual market in Mississippi is dominated by three large players that might be able to meet the 80 percent standard.



"I've got to be certain that they don't take advantage if I get a waiver," he said.



Iowa Assistant Insurance Commissioner Angela Boston was also noncommittal. Her state was one of four that went so far as to write a letter to HHS earlier this year officially requesting a waiver from the medical loss ratio standard. However, Boston noted that the letter was sent as HHS regulators were still crafting the fine print of the provision.



"Our main concern at the time was to make sure that HHS was aware that states had concerns about the impact and that HHS should be sensitive to that," she said. "That was the purpose of sending the letter."

Read more at www.washingtonpost.com
 

Swede told he had cancer and forced to have penis amputated following a YEAR of misdiagnosis

Amplify’d from www.dailymail.co.uk

Swede told he had cancer and forced to have penis amputated following a YEAR of misdiagnosis

An elderly Swedish man has had to have his penis amputated after doctors misdiagnosed his condition.

Rather than being the urinary tract infection doctors had thought, he had contracted cancer, and medics had missed the signs for over a YEAR.

As the disease had been undetected for so long, the cancer had taken hold and doctors were left with no option other than to lop off his manhood.

Taking the snip: The elderly Swede, who thought he had urinary infection, in fact had contracted cancer, and doctors were forced to amputate his penis

Taking the snip: The elderly Swede, who thought he had urinary infection, in fact had contracted cancer, and doctors were forced to amputate his penis

The sexagenarian originally visited his local clinic in Blekinge, southern Sweden, in September 2009 for treatment on what he was told was an infection.

When he returned in March 2010 complaining of foreskin irritation, the doctor on duty at the time diagnosed the problem as a simple case of inflammation, the local paper, Blekinge Läns Tidning (BLT), reported.

After three weeks passed without the prescribed treatment alleviating the man’s condition, he was instructed to seek further treatment at Blekinge Hospital.

Misdiagnosed: The man, in his 60s, went to a clinic in local Blekinge, southern Sweden

Misdiagnosed: The man, in his 60s, went to a clinic in local Blekinge, southern Sweden

But it took five MONTHS before he was able to schedule an appointment at the hospital.

When he finally met with doctors at the hospital, the man was informed he had cancer and his penis would have to be removed.

It remains unclear if the man would have been able to keep his penis had the cancer been detected sooner.

But the matter has been reported to the National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden.

Two years ago Philip Seaton also suffered a similar fate when went to be circumcised at a hospital in Louisville, Kentucky, but awoke to find his penis had been amputated.

Mr Seaton filed a lawsuit against the doctor who performed the procedure and the anesthetist, claiming mental anguish and pain.

He also said he has lost the enjoyment of life, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit says doctors only received consent to perform a circumcision and that Mr Seaton did not consent to his penis being removed.

His lawyer, Kevin George, said the organ was cut off after cancer was found, but that doctors only had consent to remove the foreskin.

Mr George said: 'Sometimes you have an emergency and you have to do this, but he could very easily closed him up and said, "Here are your options. You have cancer," and the family would have said, "We want a second opinion. This is a big deal."'

Read more at www.dailymail.co.uk
 

Government by regulation. Shhh.

Amplify’d from www.washingtonpost.com

Government by regulation. Shhh.


Most people don't remember Obamacare's notorious Section 1233, mandating government payments for end-of-life counseling. It aroused so much anxiety as a possible first slippery step on the road to state-mandated late-life rationing that the Senate never included it in the final health-care law.


Well, it's back - by administrative fiat. A month ago, Medicare issued a regulation providing for end-of-life counseling during annual "wellness" visits. It was all nicely buried amid the simultaneous release of hundreds of new Medicare rules.


Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), author of Section 1233, was delighted. "Mr. Blumenauer's office celebrated 'a quiet victory,' but urged supporters not to crow about it," reports the New York Times. Deathly quiet. In early November, his office sent an e-mail plea to supporters: "We would ask that you not broadcast this accomplishment out to any of your lists . . . e-mails can too easily be forwarded." They had been lucky that "thus far, it seems that no press or blogs have discovered it. . . . The longer this [regulation] goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it."


So much for the Democrats' transparency - and for their repeated claim that the more people learn what is in the health-care law, the more they will like it. Turns out ignorance is the Democrats' best hope.


And regulation is their perfect vehicle - so much quieter than legislation. Consider two other regulatory usurpations in just the past few days:


On Dec. 23, the Interior Department issued Secretarial Order 3310, reversing a 2003 decision and giving itself the authority to designate public lands as "Wild Lands." A clever twofer: (1) a bureaucratic power grab - for seven years up through Dec. 22, wilderness designation had been the exclusive province of Congress, and (2) a leftward lurch - more land to be "protected" from such nefarious uses as domestic oil exploration in a country disastrously dependent on foreign sources.


The very same day, the Environmental Protection Agency declared that in 2011 it would begin drawing up anti-carbon regulations on oil refineries and power plants, another power grab effectively enacting what Congress had firmly rejected when presented as cap-and-trade legislation.


For an Obama bureaucrat, however, the will of Congress is a mere speed bump. Hence this regulatory trifecta, each one moving smartly left - and nicely clarifying what the spirit of bipartisan compromise that President Obama heralded in his post-lame-duck Dec. 22 news conference was really about: a shift to the center for public consumption and political appearance only.


On that day, Obama finally embraced the tax-cut compromise he had initially excoriated, but only to avoid forfeiting its obvious political benefit - its appeal to independent voters who demand bipartisanship and are the key to Obama's reelection. But make no mistake: Obama's initial excoriation in his angry Dec. 7 news conference was the authentic Obama. He hated the deal.


Now as always, Obama's heart lies left. For those fooled into thinking otherwise by the new Obama of Dec. 22, his administration's defiantly liberal regulatory moves - on the environment, energy and health care - should disabuse even the most beguiled.


These regulatory power plays make political sense. Because Obama needs to appear to reclaim the center, he will stage his more ideological fights in yawn-inducing regulatory hearings rather than in the dramatic spotlight of congressional debate. How better to impose a liberal agenda on a center-right nation than regulatory stealth?


It's Obama's only way forward during the next two years. He will never get past the half-Republican 112th Congress what he could not get past the overwhelmingly Democratic 111th. He doesn't have the votes and he surely doesn't want the publicity. Hence the quiet resurrection, as it were, of end-of-life counseling.


Obama knows he has only so many years to change the country. In his first two, he achieved much: the first stimulus, Obamacare and financial regulation. For the next two, however, the Republican House will prevent any repetition of that. Obama's agenda will therefore have to be advanced by the more subterranean means of rule-by-regulation.


But this must simultaneously be mixed with ostentatious displays of legislative bipartisanship (e.g., the lame-duck tax-cut deal) in order to pull off the (apparent) centrist repositioning required for reelection. This, in turn, would grant Obama four more years when, freed from the need for pretense, he can reassert himself ideologically and complete the social-democratic transformation - begun Jan. 20, 2009; derailed Nov. 2, 2010 - that is the mission of his presidency.

Read more at www.washingtonpost.com
 

HotAirPundit: 'Truther' Television Crew Gets into a Confrontation With Cops Guarding Obama in Hawaii (Video)


4 Police Officers and a Doctor Killed By Gunmen Linked to Drug Cartels in Monterrey

Amplify’d from www.hapblog.com


4 Police Officers and a Doctor Killed By Gunmen Linked to Drug Cartels in Monterrey

AP video
MONTERREY, Mexico (AP) — Gunmen believed to be linked to drug cartels killed four police officers and a doctor in apparently coordinated attacks in and around the northern Mexican city of Monterrey, authorities said Thursday.

Three officers were wounded in Wednesday's attacks, said Jorge Domene, a spokesman for the security council in northern Nuevo Leon state, where Monterrey is located.

In one of the attacks, gunmen opened fire on a Monterrey police station, killing a medical doctor who was administering tests to employees at the station and wounding three officers, Domene said.

In two additional, separate attacks carried out within minutes of each other in the Monterrey suburb of Guadalupe, gunmen killed two police officers, a man and a woman.

"Yesterday's events clearly represent acts by organized crime trying to intimidate or reverse the actions that authorities have taken ... to counter the violence that has been unleashed in our state," Domene told a news conference.

Monterrey, Mexico's third-largest city, has been rocked by drug-cartel turf battl
Read more at www.hapblog.com
 

India’s Christians Suffer Spike in Assaults in Past Decade

Amplify’d from www.compassdirect.org

India’s Christians Suffer Spike in Assaults in Past Decade
Hindu nationalists were often politically motivated in their attacks.
A Christian girl who suffered burns during 2008 violence in Orissa state became the face of Christian persecution in India.





A Christian girl who suffered burns during 2008 violence in Orissa state became the face of Christian persecution in India.


NEW DELHI, December 30 (CDN) —
Christians in India faced a spike in attacks in the past decade, suffering more than 130 assaults a year since 2001, with figures far surpassing that in 2007 and 2008.
 
This year Christians suffered at least 149 violent attacks, according to the Evangelical Fellowship of India (EFI). Most of the incidents took place in just four states: two adjacent states in south India, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh, and two neighboring states in north-central India, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, noted EFI in its report, “Religion, Politics and Violence: A Report of the Hostility and Intimidation Faced by Christians in India in 2010.”
 
Of India’s 23 million Christians, 2.7 million live in the four states seen as the hub of Christian persecution. While north-central parts of the country have been tense for a decade, the escalation of attacks in southern India began last year.
 
This year Karnataka recorded at least 56 attacks – most of them initially reported by the Global Council of Indian Christians, which is based in the state capital, Bengaluru. Chhattisgarh witnessed 18 attacks, followed by Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh with 15 and 13 attacks respectively.
 
Christians are not stray incidents but are part of a systematic campaign by influential [Hindu nationalist] organizations capable of flouting law and enjoying impunity,” the EFI report said.
 
In 2009 there were more than 152 attacks across India, and the same four states topped the list of violent incidents, according to the EFI: 48 in Karnataka, 29 in Andhra Pradesh, 15 in Madhya Pradesh and 14 in Chhattisgarh.
 
Three of the four states – Karnataka, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh – are ruled by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and the EFI noted that the high number of attacks on Christians in those states was no coincidence.
 
“While it cannot be said that the ruling party had a direct role in the attacks on Christians, its complicity cannot be ruled out either,” the report stated.
 
In Andhra Pradesh, ruled by centrist Indian National Congress (commonly known as the Congress Party), most attacks are believed to be led by Hindu nationalist groups.
 
EFI remarked that “although in 2007 and 2008 two major incidents of violence occurred in eastern Orissa state’s Kandhamal district and hit headlines in the national as well as international media, little efforts have been taken by authorities in India to tackle the root causes of communal tensions, namely divisive propaganda and activities by powerful right-wing Hindu groups, who do not represent the tolerant Hindu community.”
 
The violence in Kandhamal district during Christmas week of 2007 killed at least four Christians and burned 730 houses and 95 churches, according to the All India Christian Council (AICC). These attacks were preceded by around 200 incidents of anti-Christian attacks in other parts of the country.
 
Violence re-erupted in Kandhamal district in August 2008, killing more than 100 people and resulting in the incineration of 4,640 houses, 252 churches and 13 educational institutions, according to the AICC.
 
Soon the violence spread to other states. In Karnataka, at least 28 attacks were recorded in August and September 2008, according to a report by People’s Union of Civil Liberties, “The Ugly Face of Sangh Parivar,” released in March 2009.
 
Before the two most violent years of 2007 and 2008, incidents of persecution of Christians had dipped to the lowest in the decade. In 2006 there were at least 130 incidents – more than two a week on average – according to the Christian Legal Association of India.
 
At least 165 anti-Christian attacks were reported in 2005. But from 2001 to 2004, at least 200 incidents were reported each year, according to John Dayal, secretary general of the AICC.
 
In 1998, Christians were targeted by the BJP and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh or RSS –India’s chief Hindu nationalist conglomerate and the BJP’s ideological mentor – when Italian-born Sonia Gandhi, Catholic by descent, became the president of India’s Congress Party. Gandhi, the wife of former Prime Minister of India Rajiv Gandhi, was seen as a major threat to the BJP, which had come to power for the first time at the federal level the same year. The Gandhi family has been popular since the Independence of India in 1947.
 
But Christian persecution – murder, beating, rape, false accusation, ostracism, and destruction of property – had begun spreading across the country in 2001, especially in tribal-inhabited states in central India. The attacks on Christians were apparently aimed at coaxing Sonia Gandhi to speak on behalf of Christians so that she could be branded as a leader of the Christian minority, as opposed to the BJP’s claimed leadership of the Hindu majority. Observers say it is therefore not surprising that Gandhi has never spoken directly against Christian persecution in India.
 
Change in Political Atmosphere
After Hindu nationalist groups were linked with bombings in late 2008, the RSS and the BJP distanced themselves from those charged with the terrorist violence. The BJP also adopted a relatively moderate ideological stand in campaigns during state and federal elections.
 
The BJP, mainly the national leadership, has become more moderate also because it has faced embarrassing defeats in the last two consecutive general elections, in 2004 and 2009, which it fought on a mixed plank of Hindu nationalism and development. The voters in the two elections clearly indicated that they were more interested in development than divisive issues related to identity – thanks to the process of economic liberalization which began in India in 1991.
 
The incidence of Christian persecution, however, remains high because not all in the BJP and the RSS leadership seem willing to “dilute” their commitment to Hindu nationalism. Especially some in the lower rungs and in the regional leadership remain hardliners.
 
How this ideological rift within the Hindu nationalist family will play out next year and in the coming decade is yet to be seen. There is speculation, however, that more individuals and outfits formerly connected with the RSS will part ways and form their own splinter groups.
 
Although politicians are increasingly realizing that religion-related conflicts are no longer politically beneficial, it is perhaps too early to expect a change on the ground. This is why none of the “anti-conversion” laws has been repealed.
 
Four Indian states – Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Orissa and Arunachal Pradesh – had introduced legislation to regulate religious conversion, known as “anti-conversion” laws, before 2001, and since then three more states – Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Himachal Pradesh – brought in such laws, while two states sought to make existing laws stricter.
 
Anti-conversion laws are yet to be implemented, however, in Arunachal Pradesh and Rajasthan. The anti-conversion amendment bills in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh have also faced political hurdles.
 
Although the anti-conversion laws claim to ban conversions undertaken by force or allurement – terms that have not been defined adequately – they are commonly used to jail or otherwise harass Christians who are simply following Christ’s mandate to help the poor and make disciples. The laws also require all conversions to be reported to the authorities, failing which both convert and relevant clergy can be fined and imprisoned.
 
Some of these laws also require a prospective convert to obtain prior permission before conversion.
 
Concerns in 2011
Hard-line Hindu nationalists are seeking to create more fodder for communal conflicts and violence.
 
In April 2010, Hindu nationalists declared their plan to hold a rally of 2 million Hindus in Madhya Pradesh state’s Mandla district in February 2011, with the aim of converting Christians back to Hinduism and driving away pastors, evangelists and foreign aid workers from the district.
 
Several spates of violence have been linked to past rallies. India’s first large-scale, indiscriminate attack on Christians took place in Dangs district of Gujarat state in December 1998 after local Hindu nationalist groups organized such a rally. The violence led to mass destruction of property belonging to local Christians and Christian organizations.
 
Law and order is generally a responsibility of the states, but how the federal government and other agencies respond to the call for the rally in Madhya Pradesh may indicate what to expect in the coming months and years in India.
 
END
 
*** Photos of destruction and injury in Orissa state are available electronically. Contact Compass Direct News for pricing and transmittal.
Read more at www.compassdirect.org