ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

'Dangerous' for feds to get involved in Muslim's lawsuit

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
'Dangerous' for feds to get involved in Muslim's lawsuit
Bill Bumpas - OneNewsNow

Muslim man praying hajjA legal expert says it's a "dangerous" precedent for the federal government to sue a suburban Chicago school district for denying a Muslim middle-school teacher unpaid leave to make a pilgrimage to Mecca.

According to an Associated Press report, the U.S. Department of Justice accuses the school district in Berkeley, Illinois, of violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to reasonably accommodate Safoorah Khan's religious practices. According to Islamic teaching, every adult Muslim is supposed to make at least one pilgrimage -- the "Hajj" -- to Mecca in Saudi Arabia in their lifetime if they are physically and financially able to do so. Khan had requested almost three weeks of unpaid leave.

Matt Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel, tells OneNewsNow the government's action is unprecedented. "This is an absolute bully club being used by the federal government in this lawsuit against the school to literally force this school to go out of their way to make unreasonable accommodations for a Mecca pilgrimage," he says.

 

The attorney argues this is a "dangerous path for the government to plow" because it blazes a trail for similar requests.

 
Matt Staver"...Once you then say that you can take a three-week pilgrimage to Mecca, then there really is no stopping -- you can take five sections of the workday out to go pray; you can have a certain kind of ritual washing built into the school or to the workplace to be able to do your ritual cleansing," he suggests. "It just literally opens up Pandora's Box -- and the federal laws were not designed for that kind of accommodation."

 

The AP report says Khan began teaching for Berkeley School District 87 in 2007 -- and in 2008 requested the unpaid leave for the pilgrimage. The district argued her request was unrelated to her professional duties and was not set forth in the contract between the district and the teachers union. After the district twice denied her request, Khan resigned.

 

Staver says while his group advocates for religious freedom, this particular case "literally distorts religious freedom." Liberty Counsel, he adds, would be willing to help defend this school district.

Results from our related poll

What would the Dept. of Justice do if this had been a Christian teacher?
101216poll
See more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

House votes to repeal ban on open homosexuals in military

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
House votes to repeal ban on open homosexuals in military

Associated Press logo small 2WASHINGTON - Despite warnings from military leaders and from pro-family and conservative groups, the U.S. House voted Wednesday to repeal the "don't ask, don't tell" policy that for 17 years has banned homosexuals from serving openly in the military.

The 250-175 vote propels the issue to the Senate for what could be the last chance for now to end the 1993 law that forbids recruiters from asking about sexual orientation while prohibiting soldiers from acknowledging that they are gay.

It's "the only law in the country that requires people to be dishonest or be fired if they choose to be honest," said Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo. (Obama praises House vote to end the ban)

Democratic leaders in the Senate say they are committed to bringing the bill to the floor before Congress adjourns for the year. But they are challenged by opposition from some Republicans and a daunting agenda that includes finishing work on legislation to fund the government and ratifying a nuclear arms treaty with Russia.

Failure to overturn the policy this year could relegate the issue to the back burner next year when Republicans, who are far less supportive of allowing openly gay individuals to serve in the military, take over the House and gain strength in the Senate.

"Now is the time for us to act," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and "close the door on a fundamental unfairness in our nation."

Many Republicans, led by Sen. John McCain of Arizona, argue that it would be a mistake for the military to undergo a major cultural change while the nation is fighting two wars.

Implementation of any new policy should begin "when our singular focus is no longer on combat operations or preparing units for combat," said Rep. Howard "Buck" McKeon of California, top Republican on the Armed Services Committee.

The issue also has split the military. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other senior military leaders support lifting the restrictions on gay service, pointing to a recent Pentagon study showing that most people in uniform don't object to serving with gays. But the head of the Marine Corps, Commandant Gen. James Amos, repeated his opposition this week, saying that lifting the ban during wartime could cost lives. "I don't want to lose any Marines to the distraction," he said.

The White House, in issuing a statement in support of the repeal, stressed that the change would go into effect only after the president, the secretary of Defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff certify that implementation is consistent with military readiness, recruiting and retention and unit cohesion.

The House last May voted 234-194 in favor of repeal legislation as part of a larger defense bill. The measure has stalled twice in the Senate, where Republicans have objected to taking up the defense bill laded with contentious issues, including "don't ask, don't tell."

Solmonese, the president of the gay rights group Human Rights Campaign said Wednesday's vote means the House has confirmed for the second time what military leaders, most troops and the American public have been saying, that "the only thing that matters on the battlefield is the ability to do the job."

"It is up to the Senate to consign this failed and discriminatory law to the dustbin of history," Solmonese added.

The House, in introducing the stand-alone bill, sought to avoid the complications of combining it with a general defense bill. Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., are also promoting a stand-alone bill in the Senate and supporters say they have the 60 votes for passage if they can get it to the Senate floor.

A major hurdle has been a Republican pledge to block all legislation until the Senate completes work on tax cut and government funding. The Senate on Wednesday passed the compromise on extending tax cuts worked out by the White House and Republicans.

More than 13,500 service members have been dismissed under the 1993 law.

The Obama administration, while supporting the repeal, is appealing the ruling of a California federal judge that the ban on gays serving openly in the military is unconstitutional. The administration says Congress should overturn the policy. But gay rights groups say they will shift their focus back to the courts if Congress fails to act.

Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

Armageddon Countdown

Video: Amazing Facts Presents



http://pseudo01.hddn.com/vod/vod.amazingfacts1/shows/afp/ap39.mp4

The Global Scandal of “The Global Baby”

Amplify’d from www.albertmohler.com

The Global Scandal of “The Global Baby”

The Wall Street Journal blows the cover off the international trade in babies and reproductive technologies this week, as reporters Tamara Audi and Arlene Chang tell of the emergence of a market that assembles the “global baby.”

Just consider the shocking introduction to their report:

In a hospital room on the Greek island of Crete with views of a sapphire sea lapping at ancient fortress walls, a Bulgarian woman plans to deliver a baby whose biological mother is an anonymous European egg donor, whose father is Italian, and whose birth is being orchestrated from Los Angeles.

The Bulgarian woman is a surrogate hired by an infertile Italian couple. The business arrangements are very much for-profit, and are negotiated by PlanetHospital.com, described by the Journal as “a California company that searches the world to find the components of its business line.” Audi and Chang then add: “The business, in this case, is creating babies.”

The desire for a child can be overwhelming, as the clients who go to PlanetHospital can attest. Some now turn to these international brokers who, often skirting the laws of respective nations, go around traditional means of adoption and fertility treatments. These companies do their business on a global scale, “often using an egg donor from one country, a sperm donor from another, and a surrogate who will deliver in a third country to make what some industry participants call ‘a world baby.’”

Our Ethics are Agnostic

The report candidly acknowledges the fact that many unborn babies are aborted by means of “selective reductions” - a procedure chillingly detailed in the article. Rudy Rupak, CEO of Planet Hospital, denies ethical responsibility in amazingly candid terms: “Our ethics are agnostic,” he told the paper. “How do you prevent a pedophile from having a baby? If they’re a pedophile then I will leave that to the U.S. government to decide, not me.” These firms are increasingly popular with homosexual male couples, who can arrange to have babies born that will include the DNA of both partners, so long as a common source of donor eggs is used.

The Wall Street Journal deserves credit for this important exposé of the ‘Wild Wild West” of reproductive technologies that is now operating across the globe. Made clear in this article is the fact that there is no adequate means of regulating this business.

Christians must recognize that these technologies are fraught with moral complications — and many of them dramatically so. These technologies, marketed through a global business in babies, threaten to redefine the vary nature of reproduction and the definition of family and parenthood.

On matters of such importance, it is simply evil to say, “Our ethics are agnostic.”

I am always glad to hear from readers. Write me at mail@albertmohler.com. Follow regular updates on Twitter at www.twitter.com/AlbertMohler.

Tamara Audi and Arlene Chang, “Assembling the Global Baby,” The Wall Street Journal, Sunday, December 10, 2010.

Read more at www.albertmohler.com
 

Looks Like New York's Got a Serial Killer

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Looks Like New York's Got a Serial KillerAuthorities have confirmed that all four bodies found on a Long Island beach over the weekend are female, meaning that, yes, there's a good chance we're looking at the work of a serial killer.

Obviously, no one knows for sure yet. But The New York Times is so excited by the prospect that its readers get a breakdown of a hypothetical serial killer investigation, just, you know, in case. ("Some killers carve their initials into a victim's skin. Others might take a piece of the body, say an ear or finger, as a macabre trophy." Thanks, Times! This is way better than "The Neediest Cases"!)

The New York Post and The New York Daily News, meanwhile, are less excited about the prospect of our very own backyard psycho and more interested in the ongoing search for missing prostitute Shannan Gilbert. (Though, no doubt, both have teams of editors already hard at work attempting to coin a snappy nickname for our hypothetical serial murderer friend.) As it turns out, none of the four bodies are likely to be Gilbert's, despite their all being found near where she disappeared; but police know who her last john was, and the News is all over his neighbors' reactions:


"That guy always gave me the creeps," the neighbor said.


"One night about two months ago, he parked a U-Haul van on the side of the house. It was the strangest thing," the neighbor added.


"He and another man were packing the truck up in the dark. They moved real fast. It took about fifteen minutes. They didn't turn any lights on except one little light. That was the last time I saw him."



Gustav Colletti, 75, a neighbor of the john in an exclusive part of Oak Beach, said a girl, who looked like Gilbert, banged on his door one May morning at 5 a.m.


"She was yelling and screaming and banging on my door. She was screaming, 'Help me! Help!'" I opened the door and she jumped into the house," he recalled in an interview today with The Post.


Colletti said, "When I said, 'I'm calling the police.' She opened the door and took off and ran into the weeds. Moments later, a dark Chevy Suburban and a male Asian told him; 'We're having a party and the girl got upset and ran away.'"


Colletti said when he told the man he had called police, the man said, "You shouldn't have done that."


[NYT; NYDN; NYP; image via AP]


Send an email to Max Read, the author of this post, at max@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Attempted J.F.K. Bomber Gets Life in Prison

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Abdul Kadir, the would-be J.F.K. bomber, was sentenced to life in prison by a federal judge.


Send an email to Max Read, the author of this post, at max@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Tajazzle, the Stupidest Product (and Informercial) Ever

Amplify’d from gawker.com


Tajazzle, the Stupidest Product (and Informercial) Ever Attention, ladies: Feeling insecure about... you-know-what?You might want to watch this infomercial for "Tajazzle" a three-step system to help you "Stay Dry And Smell Fresh Where It Gets Hot." Dry and "fresh"-smelling! Just the way men like it. [via]


Send an email to Max Read, the author of this post, at max@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Oklahoma to Execute Man with Animal Euthanasia Drug

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Oklahoma today will execute a man with the same drug used to euthanize cats and dogs.


Send an email to Jeff Neumann, the author of this post, at jeff@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Mercury Dental Fillings Might be Bad for You After All

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Mercury Dental Fillings Might be Bad for You After AllLast year, the FDA released a report that said mercury fillings are totally harmless when lodged into your head forever. But yesterday, an advisory committee told the FDA to look at new data that might suggest otherwise. Go figure.

The committee, which met with various experts, was quick to state that the FDA was not at fault and that their judgement was sound based on the evidence provided them for last year's research. In its report last year, the FDA stated:


While elemental mercury has been associated with adverse health effects at high exposures, the levels released by dental amalgam fillings are not high enough to cause harm in patients.


But now, experts claim that the mercury in amalgam fillings can seep out from teeth and into the brain, and even kidneys and bones. Many people testified before the committee, both for and against the use of mercury in fillings. Some of those who testified claimed miscarriages, paralysis and memory loss were due to mercury poisoning. One dentist, Dr. Stephen Markus, asked, "I always wondered why we were told by the (American Dental Association) to be careful when disposing of mercury. If it's so dangerous to the environment, why not my patients?" That's a damn good point.

The committee suggested that the FDA change the way it studies the effects of mercury vapor exposure, and that patients and dentists should have more information available to them. And really, there's a simple fix for all of this: They just need to speed up the development of tooth regeneration gel, and we won't have to worry about this ever again.

[CNN]

[Image via Shutterstock.com]


Send an email to Jeff Neumann, the author of this post, at jeff@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Sexual assault reports spike in military academies, report shows

Amplify’d from www.cnn.com

Sexual assault reports spike in military academies, report shows

By Larry Shaughnessy, CNN Pentagon Producer

Washington (CNN) -- Sexual assaults at the U.S. military's three service academies increased drastically in the 2009-2010 academic year after four years of declines, a new report shows.

The academies reported 41 sexual assaults involving cadets or midshipmen compared with 25 the prior academic year, a 64% jump. But the report warns the problem may be 10 times greater than the statistics show.

A Department of Defense statement accompanying the report said the increase could mean more reporting, not more attacks.

"This may not indicate an increase in instances of sexual assault occurring, as it could also be a result of training and education and victims' confidence in the department's ability to respond," the news release said.

Anuradha Bhagwati, a former Marine Corps captain and executive director of Service Women's Action Network, called the Defense Department statement a ""pretty pathetic explanation." The network is a national human rights organization with a goal of allowing women to serve in uniform without threat of harassment, discrimination, intimidation or assault.

This week Service Women's Action Network and the American Civil Liberties Union sued the Pentagon and the Department of Veterans Affairs, seeking records on sexual assault in the military.

Bhagwati said reporting of sex assaults by academy students is rare. The Defense Department's report to Congress, which includes a survey of academy midshipmen and cadets, confirms that.

"These survey results suggest that the 41 reports of sexual assault at the (military service academies) accounted for fewer than 10% of the incidents of unwanted sexual contact that may have actually occurred," the report says; "12.9 percent of women and 1.9 percent of men survey at all three service academies indicated experiencing unwanted sexual contact."

The 41 sexual assaults referred to are not necessarily rape. The Defense Department has a wide definition of sexual assault.

"The term 'sexual violence,' herein referred to as 'sexual assault,' is defined as intentional sexual contact, characterized by use of force, threats, intimidation, abuse of authority, or when the victim does not or cannot consent," the report said.

"The reason that so many women and men do not report their sexual assaults," Bhagwati said, "is because there is a culture of intimidation. Not just at the military academies, but also ... in the armed services themselves."

She gave as an example a woman in the military who was being choked by a male service member trying to sexually assault her. She fought back and was charged with striking a fellow service member. The man who was choking her was not charged.

Greg Jacob, policy director for Service Women's Action Network, said the Defense Department has "an abysmal record of actually prosecuting sexual predators."

He gave an example from the one cadet at the Army's U.S. Military Academy at West Point who was convicted last May of raping a fellow cadet. The cadet, Kyle Newman, was sentenced to 3 1/2 years in prison. In New York state, first-degree rape is a class B felony, punishable by 12 1/2 to 25 years in prison.

All three of the academies claim things are improving.

"Over the course of the academic program year 2009-2010, the United States Military Academy made steady progress on the prevention of sexual harassment and violence," reads a memo from the superintendent of West Point.

"The United States Naval Academy continued to demonstrate its clear commitment to both the spirit and intent of Department of Defense and Department of the Navy Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Programs," reads the Naval Academy's part of the report.

And the Air Force Academy "continues to provide a very robust education and training program, to include seminars, guest speakers and targeted year-group focused training," according the Air Force portion of the report.

"These programs extend well beyond activities that heighten awareness of the problem," Kaye Whitley, director of the Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office, said in the press release accompanying the report. "Not only do the academies have a well-organized response structure, they also incorporate sexual harassment and sexual assault prevention objectives into leadership and academic curricula."

Read more at www.cnn.com
 

Anti-Gay Group Wants Its Rainbow Back

Amplify’d from gawker.com
Anti-Gay Group Wants Its Rainbow Back

An activist for a sub-group of the anti-gay National Organization for Marriage is speaking out against the rainbow as a symbol for gay rights. "We are the real rainbow coalition. The gay lobby does not own the rainbow," she said.


Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse is the founder and president of the Ruth Institute, which describes itself as "a project of the National Organization for Marriage." On its site, the group describes its mission statement as "to promote life-long married love to college students by creating an intellectual and social climate favorable to marriage."


Becky Yeh of right-wing American Family News Network's OneNewsNow, a product of the American Family Association, writes that Morse says "the rainbow is a sign of God's covenant with man." Morse told ONN: "Proposition 8 was passed by a great grassroots coalition that included people from all across the religious traditions, and also people of every race and color. We are the real rainbow coalition. The gay lobby does not own the rainbow."


Morse continued: "We can't simply let that go by. Families put rainbows in their children's nurseries. Little Christian preschools will have rainbows...Noah's Ark and all the animals.... Those are great Christian symbols, great Jewish symbols." She also described how she wore a rainbow scarf to the Prop 8 hearings to show that anti-gay marriage activists still own the symbol.


Morse operates a blog on the Ruth Institute's website, and recently wrote a post asking supporters of same-sex marriage: "Do you really believe that mothers and fathers are interchangeable and that gender is irrelevant to parenting? If gender is really irrelevant, why do self-described "gays" insist on having a male sex partner? Why isn't a really masculine woman just as acceptable as a male sex partner?"


[viaRight Wing Watch]

Anti-Gay Group Wants Its Rainbow Back
See more at gawker.com
 

FCC sets vote on ‘net neutrality’ rules…

Amplify’d from www.westernjournalism.com

FCC sets vote on ‘net neutrality’ rules…

Contentious Internet traffic rules facing a vote next week are likely to be adopted without radically veering from a proposal unveiled earlier in the month, telecommunications policy analysts said on Wednesday.

The Federal Communications Commission will vote on Dec. 21 on whether to adopt regulations that ban the blocking of lawful traffic but allow Internet service providers to ration Web traffic on their networks.

The proposal laid out two weeks ago by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski was met with concern from the other members of the FCC, putting in question the likelihood of winning over a majority of the five-member FCC.

The two Republican commissioners have objected to FCC action on Internet rules, saying the Internet is best able to thrive in the absence of regulation. And Genachowski’s two fellow Democrats on the panel could withhold support from any measure they view as too weak.

But analysts said commissioners Mignon Clyburn and Michael Copps, the Democrats on the panel, are more likely to consider it in the majority’s interest to move ahead with so-called net neutrality rules.

Read More: Reuters

Related posts:

Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
 

LIMBAUGH: ‘MAYBE THE REAL TERRORISTS WE FACE ARE ON CAPITOL HILL’

Amplify’d from www.westernjournalism.com

LIMBAUGH: ‘MAYBE THE REAL TERRORISTS WE FACE ARE ON CAPITOL HILL’

On Wednesday, Rush Limbaugh was still fired up over the GOP being called “hostage takers” by the president last week. So, he threw out some analogies of his own, comparing Democrats to “Al Capone” and “gangsters.” But he didn’t stop there — he went on to wonder if Democrats on the Hill are the real “terrorists.”

Transcript via Mediaite:

It could well be, ladies and gentlemen, that we’re fighting the wrong enemy in the Middle East. Maybe the real terrorists that we face are on Capitol Hill. I mean, really, who’s doing as good a job to undermine what this country stands for as the terrorists? ‘Dingy’ Harry, Nancy Pelosi. I mean, look, if they call us ‘hostage takers’ and ‘gangsters,’ then why can’t we call them what they are? They are terrorists. They certainly seem suicidal. Look at what they’re doing. Look at what they did. They knew they were going to get shellacked in this election and they did it! They knew they were gonna lose. And they want to take us with them.

Here’s the full clip where Rush explains his analogy:



Read More: By Jonathan Seidl, The Blaze

Related posts:

Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
 

Lone Madman Puts Capitol Hill on Lockdown


Jury finds Masons not guilty in case  - News - Charleston Daily Mail - West Virginia News and Sports -

by Cheryl Caswell

Daily Mail staff



A jury has determined that the Masons did not defame or damage a former Grand Worshipful Master when they threw him out of the organization.



Frank Haas, 53, of Wellsburg filed a lawsuit against the Grand Lodge in Charleston and two members of the Masons hierarchy - Charlie Montgomery and Charles Coleman. Those two men succeeded Haas as state leader of the men's brotherhood.



Haas claimed he suffered emotional distress after being unexpectedly expelled as a member in 2006, shortly after his term ended. He said other Mason leaders were unhappy that he attempted to change some of the group's restrictions on race, age and disabilities.



But after more than a week of testimony from both sides, the jury decided against Haas on all counts.



The case was presided over by Kanawha Circuit Court Judge Carrie Webster.



Haas is an attorney and administrative law judge.



He told the jury that the membership of the Masons approved his reforms, but there were allegations of fraud concerning that election. The changes ended up being overturned by Coleman.



Jack Tinney, the Charleston attorney who represented the Masonic lodge, Coleman and Montgomery, said he was pleased with the trial outcome.



"It was a complete defense victory," Tinney said. "The jury found in the defendants' favor on all counts. They awarded no damages."



The jury was asked to decide whether Haas suffered any damage due to his ouster and whether any of the three defendants placed him in a false light or intentionally inflicted emotional distress.



They decided no on all issues.



Tinney said, "They feel incredibly justified and pleased with the result. They certainly believed their actions were proper and within their province, and the jury verdict affirms that."



Whether the court had any business refereeing the decisions of a private organization was a point of contention in pre-trial arguments. Tinney asked the court to dismiss the case on that basis, but two judges - first former Circuit Judge Irene Berger and then Webster - decided to let the case go to a jury.



But the verdict sends a message that such organizations have much leeway in how they manage their affairs, make their rules and deal with membership issues.



"With regard to the future, it's a private organization that controls its own operating procedures," Tinney said. "I'm confident they will continue to do so."



Contact writer Cheryl Caswell at @dailymail.com">cher...@dailymail.com or 348-4832.


Meet the mother of all earmarks: $48 billion (UPDATED)

Amplify’d from www.examiner.com

Meet the mother of all earmarks: $48 billion (UPDATED)


Leave it to Cleaver: Emanuel and his pals

If Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) gets his way, Christmas will come early to his congressional district. And judging by the size of the gift, it will last for a long, long time.

Cleaver, who is chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, is proposing to divert $48 billion of taxpayer funds to the Quality Day Campus, a not-for-profit something or other that would redistribute your money to poor people. Sounds fair, no?

Pressed for details about the plan, Cleaver’s office is quoted by the Southeast Missourian as explaining that the cash would be used for

[a] mass scale urban reclamation project for combating, reducing, reversing and/or eliminating poverty within under served communities by utilizing mass scale economic redevelopment to bring about stability and self reliance.

If that explanation strikes you as skimpy on the details, you can at least rest easy in the knowledge that once Congressman Cleaver picks your pocket for this project, he will leave you alone. Oh, wait—no he won’t. I forgot to mention the $48 bil covers “Phase One” of his vision for a richer inner city.

Is this man mad? There seems to be little question. But that’s only because members of Congress have been conditioned to view themselves as benefactors to their constituents. Remember, the late John Murtha saw nothing wrong with extracting $200 million from the national coffers to build an airport—named for him, no less—that has three commercial flights a day.

Of course, when it comes to acts of indebtedness to one’s congressional district, there is a yawning chasm between $200 million and $48 billion.

It is worth noting that this is not the first time Cleaver has promoted this absurd experiment in wealth redistribution. His previous efforts have blessedly failed, as almost certainly will this one. The real question that emerges is when American voters will say, “Enough!” When we will get on the case of our elected officials in Congress to do the job they were hired to do, which is make laws, not friends back home.

UPDATE: It has been brought to my attention that the Wall Street Journal blog Washington Wire reports Cleaver had been asked to help secure this earmark but never actually proposed it in Congress. The item appears on Cleaver's appropriations spreadsheet with no amount entered next to it. Mary Petrovic, a spokeswoman for Cleaver, has stated, "We did not propose it [the inner-city project], we do not promote it, and we did not submit it to the House Appropriations Committee.”

Petrovic went on to clarify that Cleaver did not specify which earmarks he actually supported because “the rules do not require us to do so.” Accurate though her statement might be, it would seem based on entries in Cleaver's spreadsheet that perhaps it's high time those rules were changed. The total of the items penciled in that do have dollar amounts—which includes half a billion dollars for a regional transit system upgrade for Jackson County—is well over $1 billion dollars. That's a lot of proposals for a member of a legislative body with more than 500 members. It would benefit us as a nation to place some constraints on what our elected lawmakers can promise their constituents back home—a measure that would ensure greater transparency at election time.

Read more at www.examiner.com
 

The real goal of the climate conference?

Amplify’d from www.sbcbaptistpress.org
FIRST-PERSON: The real goal of the climate conference?
Penna Dexter
DALLAS (BP)--Another United Nations Climate Conference has come to an end. Delegates from 194 countries traveled to Cancun, Mexico, where they hobnobbed and deliberated for two weeks.

Mexican President Felipe Calderon delivered the first speech. Pat Carlson, president of Texas Eagle Forum, was in attendance and reports that the Mexican president "spoke with great concern about global warming and the damage humans are perpetrating on the planet citing the deaths of 60 people in Mexico because of weather extremes." Mrs. Carlson thought the concern seemed a little out of proportion considering thousands are dying in Mexico due to drug violence.

The truth is that most of these folks were not in Cancun to change the climate. They were there to advance the global redistribution of wealth from rich countries to poor. They argue that the United States and other developed nations have caused global warming by emitting too much greenhouse gas into the atmosphere. Now we're supposed to hand over billions of bucks to poor and developing nations to pay some sort of historical debt. This hoax is built upon certain assumptions.

Brian Sussman, award-winning television weatherman and now San Francisco radio host, wrote a great book last year: "Climategate." In it he discusses the erroneous claims made at every climate conference:

-- Claim No. 1: Temperatures will rise about four degrees in the 21st century. Sussman points out that since 1850, the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the average surface temperature of the earth has risen only .7 degrees Celsius. That's just over one degree Fahrenheit in 160 years. And most of this was before 1942! Scary!

-- Claim No. 2: By the end of the century, sea levels will rise two meters, overwhelming certain island nations. Sussman points out that the oceans have been rising tiny fractions of an inch each year since the Ice Age. At that rate, in the next 90 years, we'll see the waters rise a few inches. We'll adjust.

-- Claim No. 3: The United States and other developed countries should mandate the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions and should do this by rationing energy use. By doing so, they claim, we will lessen the effects of the previously described global warming.

But planetary warming is not a problem. An increasing number of scientists and other believers in human-caused warming are rethinking their positions. They realize that fixing climate change, an absurd concept, is simply an excuse for U.N. planners to move wealth from richer countries to poorer ones. In order to perpetuate this global climate regime, countries will be forced to ration energy. When countries drastically cut energy use they limit their potential for growth. And of course, that's the point. In "Climategate," Sussman quotes President Obama's Director of Science and Technology Policy, John Holdren, who wrote, "A massive campaign must be launched in North America to restore a high-quality environment and to de-develop the United States." Conservative leader Cathie Adams, another participant at the conference, visited a community outside Cancun where the houses are made of discarded campaign posters and people prepare meals on old ironing boards. She wondered if this is what UN planners mean when they advocate drastic emissions cuts.

We should admit these climate conferences are really economic conferences meant to squeeze successful economies.
--30--
Penna Dexter is a conservative activist and frequent panelist on the "Point of View" syndicated radio program. Her weekly commentaries air on the Bott and Moody Radio Networks.
Read more at www.sbcbaptistpress.org