ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Jesse's Dangerous Game

Jesse's Dangerous Game

Jesse's Dangerous Game

A former Navy SEAL commander questions Ventura's claim that he hunted man in Vietnam.

by Bill Salisbury

POSTED MAY 8, 2001--- MINNEAPOLIS-- A few weeks before the revelation that ex-Navy SEAL Bob Kerrey was involved in the death of civilians during the Vietnam War, Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura had ignited a controversy of his own by boasting in a confrontational interview with a Minneapolis Star Tribune columnist that he had "hunted man" as a Navy SEAL in Vietnam.

Initial press coverage focused on how Ventura's assertion that "until you hunted man, you haven't hunted yet," had riled many Minnesotans who hunt only non-human game. But more importantly, Ventura's claim invites a revisiting of long-standing questions about his military service, as it raises new ones about what the governor did, or didn't do, in Vietnam.

In December, 1999, I wrote an article for the San Diego Reader titled, "Jesse (The Great Pretender) Ventura." The article challenged Ventura's claim that as James Janos he'd been a SEAL in Vietnam. I wrote that Janos had not been a SEAL but merely a member of Underwater Demolition Team (UDT) 12 who had been stationed in the Philippines and not Vietnam.

The article relied on several interviews with real SEALS who had been in Nam and UDT men who had served with Janos. I also drew on my 16 years as a SEAL, that included a combat tour as officer-in-charge of SEAL Team 1, Detachment Golf, duty as executive officer of SEAL Team 2 during the war, and a stint as commanding officer of UDT 11 after the war.

Before going to press I asked Ventura's spokesman, John Wodele, for the governor's comment. "We will have no comment on something so obviously false," said Wodele in an indignant, imperial tone. (In fairness to Wodele, I didn't tell him of my own SEAL and UDT credentials, but left him to assume I was just some West Coast "jackal" whining and snapping at his boss's heels.)

Ventura continued to hide behind Wodele and his stone wall when I appeared on the Fox News Channel program "Hannity and Colmes" a few days after the Reader article appeared. When Fox asked Ventura to respond, Wodele wrote: "The only thing we have ever said is that the UDT and SEAL designation is interchangeable and we don't have any further comment."

Why would Ventura - who loves to run his mouth about having been a SEAL - suddenly clam up when I publicly stated in so many words that he was, as my grandma used to say, full of more crap than a Christmas turkey? The governor could have silenced me and his growing pack of critics by simply producing his discharge certificate from active duty, called a DD 214. If he'd been one of America's roughest, toughest, meanest mothers, then that document would list Then there's your UDT buddy, Gary 'Bones' Bonnelli, who says you weren't in Nam with him, but that you were floating around the South China Sea, on a ship with the Amphibious Ready Group -- making ports of call in such high-threat areas as Hong Kong, Singapore, and Bangkok.the qualification for all the world to see. And if the SEAL/UDT designation were truly interchangeable, the form would reflect that. But I know it doesn't without even looking at it. The UDT designation, or Navy Enlisted Classification (NEC) - was 5321/22 and the SEAL designation was 5326.

How do I know this? Because as the executive officer of SEAL Team 2, I recommended men for the 5326 designation after they had completed a six month probationary period. Many of these men came from UDTs as 5321/22s. As commanding officer of UDT 11, I awarded the 5321/22 designation to frogmen after their probationary period. Interchangeable designation my ass.

If Jesse were a SEAL, his DD 214 would also list at least one "Presidential Unit Citation for service Nam." How do I know this? Because of my duty with both SEAL Teams during the war. Every SEAL who served with Teams 1 and 2 received at least one DD 214 (NOT Jesse's)of the five Presidential Unit Citations awarded those units. UDTs received none. So c'mon, Jesse, show us your DD 214. You can even do that without breaking your vow never to talk about what you did as a "SEAL" in Nam.

But no fair relying on public pronouncements by your old toadies in the Teams, or a scrap of paper signed by some fawning Navy bureaucrat 30 years later, saying it's okay for you to call yourself a SEAL because UDTs were decommissioned in 1983. After all, you wouldn't want to be dismissed as a "Paper SEAL" would you? I mean it's okay for some pencil-necked sandcrab like George Plimpton to joke about being a "Paper Tiger" instead of a true major leaguer, but aren't you claiming to be the real deal: an ass-kicking, name-taking Navy SEAL?

Of course if you're unwilling to share your DD 214, then your pet jackals in the Twin Cities might want to fire off a Freedom of Information Act request to the Navy. Or they could request a copy of the UDT 12 Command History for the years you were with that team (1971- 1974). They could read the "History" to see if you got any ink for combat exploits. Hell. if you truly saw combat with Team 12 - faced Charley or Clyde at a given time in a given place with the burnt smell of expended rounds in the air - that would be good enough for me. I wouldn't quibble over whether you were a Frog or a SEAL and you could lay this controversy to rest - give it a double tap, an ear shot.

Another good resource is the Commander Naval Forces Vietnam monthly combat summaries that cover your time in the Western Pacific. Or the UDT 12 Cruise Book that chronicledCover of Jesse's UDT 12 Cruise Book your team's deployments. (SEALS didn't have time for such books.) You could even share your copy with them. One of your former commanding officers at UDT 12 shared his copy with me and said you'd never been in combat. Said he didn't remember you too well at all except as a guy who was good for morale because you had a great sense of humor. Your former CO was with me in Nam before he took over Team 12. He doesn't think the terms UDT and SEAL were interchangeable.

Then there's your UDT buddy, Gary "Bones" Bonnelli, who was one of a very few UDT 12 frogmen stationed in Nam, at a place near the Nam Can Forest called Solid Anchor. Bonnelli says you weren't in Nam with him, but that you were floating around the South China Sea on a ship with the Amphibious Ready Group, making ports of call in such high-threat areas as Hong Kong, Singapore, and Bangkok.

Another picture of James Janos, far leftAnd sure enough, when I read your old CO's Cruise Book I saw Bonnelli and others listed as having been in 'Nam, but all I found about you was that you'd played on the UDT 12 basketball team in the Philippines, at the naval station in Subic Bay.

Anyone wanting to avoid the hassle of prying documents from the Navy should get T.L. Bosiljevac's book, UDT/SEAL Operations in Vietnam, (Ivy, 1990.) Bosiljevac, a SEAL officer, reviewed command histories, cruise books, and monthly operational summaries to compile a chronological narrative of every UDT and SEAL combat action in Nam. The Navy-sponsored research was part of his master's thesis at the Naval Postgraduate School.

I've also learned from men who served with you in UDT 12 that you deployed to the Western Pacific (WESTPAC) during the war from February to October 1971. I checked UDT/SEAL Operations in Vietnam for that period and here's what I found. UDT 12 is mentioned only twice: "UDT 12 relieved UDT 13 in February as the WESTPAC - deployed underwater demolition team (page 155); "(A four-man SEAL detachment) spent 8 August to 22 September with UDT 12 aboard the USS Grayback to assist in training (page 160)." As you know, the Grayback was a submarine that operated out of Subic Bay.

While you were in WESTPAC as a frogman, here's a sampling of what SEALS were up to in Nam:

  • Raided a VC financial meeting on 9 February, killing four guerrillas and capturing four others.
  • Conducted a daylight helo raid on 13 February, killing three VC and destroying a twenty-man rest area.
  • Attacked an enemy base on 20 February, killing one Chinese propaganda officer and wounding five others.
  • Killed eight VC and captured numerous weapons on 24 February.
  • Killed five VC and captured five others on 7 March.
  • Killed two VC and captured three others along with a VC flag and kilo of documents on 15 March.
  • Killed 3 VC aboard four sampans on 12 May.
  • Killed five VC attending a political meeting on 7 July.
  • Killed 8 VC in hand-to-hand combat on 23 August.
  • Killed 2 VC guarding a weapons cache on 28 August.

SEALs interchangeable with UDTs? I think not.

But SEALS didn't always win the manhunting contests while you were shooting hoops in the Philippines and pulling liberty in Hong Kong: a SEAL squad transiting the Ham Luong Canal on 28 February took heavy casualties when a B-40 rocket slammed into their boat; Lieutenant Michael Collins of SEAL Team 1 died on 4 March after suffering multiple fragmentation wounds from a VC ambush (more about Mike later); Petty Officer Lester Moe of SEAL Team 1 was killed walking point on 19 March when he stepped on a "Bouncing Betty" mine. And so it went Jesse, for SEALS but not frogmen during your deployment.

Of course maybe Bosiljevac somehow missed your manhunting ops. Tell you what - as one old SEAL/UDT manhunter to another - let's share a war story or Bosiljevac's Booktwo and give those who dream of being warriors a glimpse of the glamour. Here are two "no shitters"- as your fellow celeb "Demo" Dick Marcinko might put it - that have stayed with me for a long time.

Many SEALS like to talk about the first man they killed. I sometimes do that. He was a VC courier sliding along the Upper Dong Tam River in a sampan beneath overhanging branches to avoid detection from the air. I brain-shot him with a CAR 15 - a weapon that looks like a toy. I was close enough to see blood and bone spray when the round struck.

But I usually don't talk about the first man I killed, Jesse. I usually talk about the first man I watched die. His name was Bobby Neal and he worked for me when I ran three SEAL platoons out of Nha Be 30 miles below Saigon on the border of a 500-square mile swamp called the Rung Sat. Neal took a lot longer to die than the courier. Neal was 18 when he got hit: he'd enlisted at 17 on what you may remember the Navy called a "kiddie cruise."

A Chicom grenade that exploded in the well-deck of a Mike boat perforated Neal's stomach lining. After the dustoff helo took him to Binh Hoa, I thought he would make it. I continued to think so until my third visit. On that visit I saw that they'd moved him away from the other wounded in the Quonset hut to a small room behind a partition. He was alone in the room except for a nurse. As I approached Neal's bed the nurse cautioned me that he was very weak. "He's a guarded case," she whispered, "he has peritonitis."

At the time I didn't know what peritonitis meant, Jesse, even though I was 26 - which was getting up there for a manhunter in that war or perhaps in any war.

I've run the Neal movie through my brain so often that the setting and dialogue remain as clear now as on the day I stood by his bed, looking at his pale, slender body covered from the waist down by a sheet. Neal's eyes were closed, his head turned so that I could see the crescent on his scalp where they had shaved his thick black hair to get at the shrapnel. His arm stretched out to receive the trickle of clear fluid coming through a tube from a bottle above the bed.

"Neal," I said softly, "Neal."

He opened his eyes and turned his head toward me. His eyes were dark and seemed too large for his face, like the eyes of a child in a Betanzos painting.

"Oh, what? Oh, I thought you were someone else."

"It's me. How you feeling?"

"Not bad, sir. But I can't move. I mean I got so many tubes in me that all I can move is this arm and my head. Used to have a tube up my nose and couldn't even move my head then."

With his free hand he grasped the sheet covering him and pulled it farther down. "See all those tubes?," he asked. A T-shaped bandage stretched across the boy's stomach and down his groin; two plastic tubes extended from beneath the bandage to a pair of bottles placed on a low table next to the bed.

"Well, those tubes are so I can shit and piss, see. Then there's another tube beneath the bandage to drain pus outa my gut. They change the bandage a lot and Christ does it stink. Like something rotten."

The boy began to breathe heavily as if unused to the effort of so much talking.

I said, "You look good, Bobby. Just take it easy. Don't talk so much if it's a strain."

"Oh no, no. I like to talk."

"I brought you some letters. I'll put them on the table and you can read them later, or have the nurse read them to you."

"Thank you, sir. Who are they from?"

"Two are from your parents."

"My parents?"

"Yes, from Virginia."

"Oh, there must be some mistake, sir. You see my parents are in Saigon. My mother visits me every day."

"I see. How are your parents?"

"Very fine, sir. Except my mom doesn't like being so far away from me. It's a long drive from Saigon."

"Yes, it is."

The boy began to speak again but coughed, then gagged on some sputum. He coughed the sputum onto his chin. I untied the olive-drab bandana from around my neck and used it to wipe away the sputum.

The nurse heard the gagging and came to the bed. I said, "I have to go, Bobby. I'll be back soon." The boy, exhausted from coughing, nodded and closed his eyes.

As I walked away with the nurse I asked, "What's it look like?"

"Bad," she replied. "But he's in no pain."

Bobby Neal died shortly after I left, Jesse, and then I knew what peritonitis meant.

This next story ought to interest you because it's about a SEAL who was a collegiate swimmer. I understand that you were a pretty fair swimmer when you were a young man.

Mike Collins swam for the Naval Academy. They named the Coronado Amphibious Base pool for him after he got churched in the Delta near Ben Tre. I wasn't there, but your UDT 12 skipper was on the helo pad at Binh Thuy when they brought Mike in. He'd taken a lot of shrapnel in the face and head. Your old skipper - I'll call him Jake - told me about it one night around a camp fire in Baja where we'd gone to fish a Pacific estuary called estero coyote. We'd had a good day: we were eating fresh-caught flounder and washing it down with a little "Jack in the Bottle." Nobody around but us and the coyotes whining and snapping just beyond our fire as they searched for fish entrails we'd thrown them.

"Mike was one of my platoon leaders," Jake said. "He was going up river at night with his platoon on the way to an ambush site when the boat began taking fire from the banks. The boat cleared the kill zone without a scratch. But they decided, hey, lets go back and take those fuckers on. They'd no sooner reentered the kill zone when either a B40 rocket or rifle grenade struck and blasted shrapnel across the boat - killed or wounded every soul on board."

"I sent out a SEAL relief force in helos that managed to suppress the VC fire and medevac the dead and wounded. I was on the helo pad when they landed. Collins came off first and even though you could see he was dead - he was just drenched in blood from his head wounds - the docs tried to save him."

"They started pounding on his chest trying to get the pump started. They kept at it for at least 10 minutes. Mike's arms and legs were flopping around and I thought maybe he was alive after all. But the movement was just from all the pounding."

"Yet they saved a guy named DaCroce. I don't know how. Jesus, he looked awful. So much blood. He had so much blood on him you couldn't see the features of his face. The blood was just caked on - just crusted and caked."

In the fireglow I could see Jake was crying, not sobbing, but just quietly crying with the tears tracking down through the fish flakes caught in his four-day whiskers. Then he composed himself and we talked about something else while the coyotes began to yap, growl, and fight among themselves in the darkness.

Several years before Jake told me his story, I had attended a ceremony in Coronado, California, when the Navy named the Amphibious Base pool for Mike. I thought about the last time I was with him. We were chasing Southern snap through the bars of Phenix City, Alabama. Mike had just finished jump school at Fort Benning and I was a new Ranger eager to live my life in danger. We got along. We were jocks and we were SEALS.

I sat behind his mother at the pool dedication on that sun-filled day in Coronado. I heard her weeping for a son ten years dead. I concentrated on the 50 meter lanes stretching before us, imagining Mike powering into the far wall, exploding out of a flip turn, pulling hard toward us. Then all I saw was empty water.

So there it is, Jesse. Now it's your turn to inspire would-be warriors, those who would spare Bambi and be hunters like us, of the most dangerous game.

Cursor home

Geoffrey Robertson vs Pope Benedict XVI - ABC Canberra - Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Geoffrey Robertson vs Pope Benedict XVI - ABC Canberra - Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Geoffrey Robertson vs Pope Benedict XVI

Geoffrey Robertson puts forward his case against the Vatican.


Geoffrey Robertson would like to see Pope Benedict XVI be made accountable for years of sexual abuse within the Catholic Church.

The Australian-born QC's new book, The Case of the Pope, says the Pope is morally responsible for a crime against humanity.

"What we're dealing with is tens of thousands of rapes of children. When you investigate the particular areas in Ireland three judicial reports have said endemic in Catholic intuitions - wide spread and systematic.

"That happens to be the definition of a crime against humanity."

He believes the Vatican have caused the widespread nature of the abuse.

"They were moving paedophile priests from one country to another and covering up paedophilia in the church by a medieval process of canon law, where bishops don't hand over priests to the police to prosecute. They deal with them in private, where the punishment is to go and do penance."

Mr Robertson wants to see the system of canon law changed.

The QC refutes the claims from various publications and commentators that the numbers of priests sexually abusing children have been sensationalised.

"The Church itself accepts up to five per cent which is twenty thousand. A paedophile priest throughout their life will molest dozens of children. An Austrian Cardinal is said to have molested thousands of children in a sixty year life."

While Mr Robertson doesn't blame the Pope for any actual abuse personally.

"All I'm saying is that the Vatican should comply with the convention of the Rights of the Child, which every country except America has ratified.

"The Vatican must adopt a zero tolerance attitude towards the abuse of a child and a mandatory reporting policy, handing over evidence of abuse to police and a protection for whistle blowers."

He thinks the Pope will make these changes.

"He's come along way. In Easter he was passing this off as petty gossip. Last week in England he apologised for what he called 'the unspeakable crimes of my clergy'.

"I'm pushing at an open door."


Audio

Expand/Collapse
Javascript is currently no enabled on your browser. To view this media, please enabled Javascript in your browser setttings. Download this mp3 file


Geoffrey Robertson, author of 'The Case Of The Pope' talks with 666's Genevieve Jacobs

SpirituallySmart.Com's Blog: Jesse Ventura was never a USN Seal?

SpirituallySmart.Com's Blog: Jesse Ventura was never a USN Seal?

Jesse Ventura was never a USN Seal?

Source: http://www.youtube.com/user/jesseVenturanotaSeaI

Website: http://cursor.org/venturawatch/dangerous_game.htm

From September 11, 1969 to September 10, 1975 Jesse Ventura served in the USN attached to UDT 12, an underwater demolition team. UDT 12 existed at the same time the SEALS existed. The UDTs were later broken up and some of the frogmen as they were called got additional training and became SEALS, some became SDVT and others became NDU and Navy Salvage Divers; but that was in 1983, 8 and a half years after Jesse Ventura, (then Jim Janos) left the US Navy.

Because he CONSTANTLY claims to be a SEAL, a real SEAL Commander Bill Salisbury, a 16 year SEAL team veteran and San Diego attorney wrote an article for the San Diego Reader that basically called him a liar and a phony. Here's the original article:

http://tinyurl.com/yczf3cu

This got reporters asking questions that Ventura tried to brush off or stonewall, finally, on a Minnesota public radio interview on December 14, 1999 Governor Venturas spokesman confirmed that Ventura was never a member of the Navy SEALs and his stated that the "Governor has never tried to convince people otherwise".

http://tinyurl.com/3y49upa

But that didn't stop Jesse. Oh no. After going on and on about how he had "hunted men" in Vietnam when he was a SEAL a TV station got a hold of a copy of his dd-214 discharge papers and noticed that he didn't have a combat action ribbon which was awarded to "those involved in a firefight or who went on clandestine or special operations where the risk of enemy fire was great or expected". The transcript is here:

http://tinyurl.com/yaebr2q

FINALLY, in January 2002, Ventura ADMITTED to the Pioneer Press and the Minnesota Star Tribune that he did not see combat:

http://tinyurl.com/ydmwbjp

Now he is back to ranting about his non existent SEAL service like nothing ever happened. Why is this important? Because during the time Jesse Ventura was in UDT 12 SEAL team one lost 34 men to combat in Vietnam. UDT 12 lost 1 man to a training accident in the Philippines.

http://tinyurl.com/y9to2m4

Climate talks struggle as China and U.S. face off: Scientific American

Climate talks struggle as China and U.S. face off: Scientific American

28. The Scapegoat « Sabbath Sermons

28. The Scapegoat « Sabbath Sermons

This study is a conclusion of the whole sanctuary service. The scapegoat was the last activity in the sanctuary. Everything that was written in the Law of Moses was to be fulfilled concerning Christ and the whole plan of salvation. Everything that the sanctuary unveils, Gods way in the sanctuary

Continuing Counter Reformation: Denver, CO, USA 'Back and to the Left'

Continuing Counter Reformation: Denver, CO, USA 'Back and to the Left'

Denver, CO, USA 'Back and to the Left'

A recent visit to the State Capitol building of the State of Colorado revealed
these unmistakable familiar juxtapositions of the Romish-Masonic occult
government hidden in plain sight








All seeing masonic eye in pyramid atop roman fasces

Who wants a Santa-free Christmas? | Reuters

Who wants a Santa-free Christmas? | Reuters

I don't want St. Nicholas either! Revelation 2:6 (King James Version) 6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitanes, which I also hate.

Pa. House approves bill to expand self-defense law - The York Daily Record

Pa. House approves bill to expand self-defense law - The York Daily Record

HARRISBURG -- A bill to expand self-defense rights passed the state House of Representatives by a wide margin Tuesday, but despite strong opinions on the topic a parliamentary maneuver foreclosed all debate.

The vote to widen the "castle doctrine" so that it applies beyond homes and vehicles was 159-38, with dozens of Democrats voting with Republicans, the latest demonstration of how gun issues do not follow partisan political lines in the Pennsylvania Legislature.

The bill would remove the duty to retreat before using deadly force, except under certain circumstances. People would have the right to stand their ground if they have the right to be where they are attacked; if they believe force is needed to prevent death, serious injury, kidnapping or rape; and if the attacker displays a deadly weapon or otherwise demonstrates such a threat.

A positive vote in the Senate would send the bill to the governor to take action on it. Gov. Ed Rendell has not said whether he supports the measure.

"The governor will review the bill carefully before making a decision about whether or not to sign it," spokesman Gary Tuma said in a statement Tuesday night.

House Minority Leader Sam Smith, R-Jefferson, who muscled the bill to a vote, said in a statement that the law was designed to help people protect themselves.

"The fact is, there are violent criminals," Smith said. "Law-abiding citizens should not be victimized twice: once for being attacked by a violent criminal and, secondly, in a civil suit. This legislation protects their rights."

Smith's motion to "call the previous question" prevented amendments from being considered, and led immediately to a vote without debate. The rarely used procedural move drew complaints from Democrats.

Rep. Bryan Lentz, D-Delaware, tried without success to get the House to amend the bill to prevent people from getting an out-of-state permit to carry a gun after being denied a permit in Pennsylvania. Other amendments would have required reporting of lost or stolen guns, limiting handgun purchases to one per month and granting Philadelphia authority to ban assault weapons.

"Whether you're for this or against it, there should be no fear in having a thorough discussion of the issues," said Majority Leader Todd Eachus, D-Luzerne. "Using this motion as a way of silencing all debate is not healthy for the collision of differences in this commonwealth."

The bill also says someone who has used deadly force in a lawful manner can be awarded legal costs if they are sued by the attacker. It makes the penalty more severe for receiving stolen property, when the property is a gun.

A Senate Republican staffer said the bill was likely to be taken up in that chamber next week.

Outside Supreme Court, another kind of argument - The York Daily Record

Outside Supreme Court, another kind of argument - The York Daily Record

Snyder v. Phelps: Updates from the day of arguments - The York Daily Record

Snyder v. Phelps: Updates from the day of arguments - The York Daily Record

Snyder v. Phelps: Updates from the day of arguments

The Supreme Court will ultimately decide whether a protest at a military funeral was protected by the First Amendment.
York, Pa., Daily Record/Sunday News

Albert Snyder, right, stands by as attorney Sean Summers speaks at a news conference on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court after their oral arguments Wednesday. (DAILY RECORD / SUNDAY NEWS -- PAUL KUEHNEL)
Sam Garrett, an 18-year-old student at George Washington University student, left, holds a sign outside the Supreme Court Wednesday. (Daily Record/Sunday News -- Paul Kuehnel)

Transcript

Read the transcript from today's hearing.

Full stories

· In Snyder v. Phelps, Supreme Court put lawyers on the spot

· Outside Supreme Court, another kind of argument

Follow the story

· Follow us onTwitter and Facebook.



Updates

12:05 p.m. Both sides said they thought they did well.

The justices asked a number of hypotheticals to Margie Phelps, in terms of what is public speech and what makes someone a public figure.

Snyder attorney Sean Summers fielded questions about when should a funeral be considered private. Justices asked: If the ceremony wasn't interrupted, could that actually be intruding on Snyder's privacy? What qualifies as an intrusion?

Justice Stephen Breyer repeatedly asked both attorneys how they would develop a rule to differentiate public vs. private speech in the case of intentional infliction of emotional stress.

11:58 a.m. For Albert Snyder, who sued Westboro Baptist Church in June 2006, his effort to prove the church members should pay for protesting at his son's funeral ended this morning. Now he awaits the justices' decision.

One of his lawyers, Craig Trebilcock, said community support has helped Snyder, who has said that he could not think of his son's funeral without also thinking of the protest.

"Before, he couldn't get closure," Trebilcock said. "But the nation closing in around him has been positive. I've seen a real change in him since this."

11:27 a.m. Albert Snyder exited the Supreme Court to applause from people gathered outside. Snyder's lawyer, Sean Summers, is giving his news conference now.

"I wish (Matthew Snyder) were here in person today so I could thank him personally for his service," Summers said.

He said the arguments went as expected.

"There were some tough questions -- many that went to the slippery slope," Summers said.

11:19 a.m. Margie Phelps, who argued Westboro's case, said it went "excellent."

"Having your feelings hurt is not enough to shut off free speech," she said.

11:11 a.m. The arguments have ended. Daily Record/Sunday News reporter Jeff Frantz said Sean Summers, lawyer for Albert Snyder of Spring Garden Township, was about 20 seconds into his opening statement when Associate Justice Antonin Scalia asked the first

The Phelps family holds a news conference on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday after oral arguments in their case. (DAILY RECORD / SUNDAY NEWS -- PAUL KUEHNEL)
question: Why a funeral was important as context in the argument about Westboro Baptist Church's speech.

We'll post more details about how the arguments went as we get them.

11:04 a.m. David Bader of York is outside the Supreme Court and told a television station, "I hope the American people see how ridiculous this all is. Right here is the time for free speech, not at a funeral."

10:55 a.m. Abigail Phelps emerged from inside the courtroom, having been given, she said, a 15-minute look at the arguments, and said, "You should've heard the justices in there, they were vivisecting the plaintiffs.

"They ain't got no case with this set of facts."

Then Phelps started singing a farcical version of the Marine

SNYDER CASE
What is more important, freedom of speech or a right to privacy at a funeral? Full coverage
Total Votes = 437
Free speech
14.18 %
Privacy at funeral
84.21 %
Not sure/don't care
1.601 %
Corps hymn, as a man with a red Marine Corps flag paraded back and forth in front of the Westboro church members.

10:43 a.m. Michael Mergante, an undergraduate at American University who is from New York, was among the people who got into the courtroom for a three-minute look at the proceedings. He said the justices seemed "hostile" toward Sean Summers, attorney for Albert Snyder.

Justices Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia asked Summers to cite specific cases that would allow speech at funeral protests to be banned. Summers cited two cases, Mergante said, but the judges did not seem impressed.

10:28 a.m. Larry Twitchell of Englewood, Fla. was standing with a group of people wearing buttons with Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder's picture on them. Twitchell, who used to be in the Air Force, said he came to support Al Snyder.

He said he met Snyder last night at a hotel.

"These people disgust me," Twitchell said of Westboro Baptist Church. "They have a right to speak but not at a funeral."

10:12 a.m. A few minutes before arguments were scheduled to start at 10 a.m., Jacob Phelps, 27, a grandson of Fred Phelps, stood outside the Supreme Court with a 9-year-old member of the Phelps family.

"These kids live and breathe this message because they love it," Phelps said. "My best friend left last year because he didn't.

"We don't hold people. We don't drink the Kool-Aid. We don't make anyone do this."

Nearby, 26-year-old Amanda Klinger, a lawyer from Landover, Md., held a sign that said: "WBC, thanks for making acceptance, tolerance and love look reasonable." But she, like some others outside the court today, tried to balance her disapproval of Westboro's message with the right to free speech.

"As much as I disagree with the Westboro church, I want to make sure the Supreme Court comes to a decision that protects the First Amendment," she said. "Anytime you erode the First Amendment, it's a very slippery slope. At the same time, I'd like to see (the Phelpses) get it stuck to them."




9:56 a.m. Nathan Riedy, a York County resident attending Eastern University in Philadelphia, said he camped out at the Supreme Court last night and expected to get in to see the arguments.

"I consider myself an evangelical Christian, but reject the hate rhetoric of the Westboro Baptist Church," he wrote in an e-mail. "I believe Christ called his followers to do the opposite of what they do."

Check back for Riedy's take on the arguments later this afternoon.

9:17 a.m. Tyler Sadonis, an 18-year-old freshman at American University, arrived at the Supreme Court around midnight with a couple other students from the AU School of Public Affairs' leadership program.

"It's the excitement of a well-known case. As a student here, you want to take advantage of these things," he said.

He wasn't sure if he would get in to see the arguments.

"It's interesting because anyone can speak their mind, but morally there is a fine line, so it will be interesting to see if that weighs anything."

9:15 a.m.

The man in his underwear and sunglasses, holding the sign "Fred Phelps wishes he were hot like me," is Sam Garrett. He's an 18-year-old student at George Washington University.

"I think they (the Phelps) do all of this for some reason. My theory is they're jealous, they wish they were hot like me."

Next to a Phelps sign, "Thank God for dead soldiers," a woman is holding a sign "Thank God for soldiers like Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder fighting for our freedom."

8:55 a.m. Jenny Hoffpauir of Washington, D.C. brought her 8-year-old son Barnaby Hearst because she thought the case was interesting and the First Amendment was something he could readily understand. She explained to him how the court works:

"The justices are really smart. These nine justices ask attorneys questions, like, 'Do you really mean that?' and give hypotheticals like, 'What would happen ...?' These attorneys have to answer the questions. They have to think on their feet."

Hoffpauir also said that she can explain to Barnaby "that I don't like what Fred Phelps has to say, but I do want him to win the case."

8:48 a.m. There are about eight Westboro demonstrators holding signs. About a half-dozen counter-protestors are holding signs with slogans such as "Signs are so gay," "If you're going to heaven, hell sounds nice," and "God hates you."

People in the crowd are mugging for photos in front of the picketers.

8:45 a.m. Christina Wells, a University of Missouri law professor who is a First Amendment scholar and co-wrote an amicus brief supporting Westboro, was in line with three colleagues this morning to try to get in to see the arguments. Supreme Court staff gave tickets to the first 100 people in line; Wells and her group were Nos. 101-104.

She still has hope of getting in.

"There's only a few cases each year that get this kind of attention. I'm really hoping I get to experience it," she said.

8:43 a.m. Tim Phelps, son of Fred Phelps who is among church members protesting this morning, says the FBI is investigating an envelope with white powder inside that was sent to his father in Topeka yesterday.

8:20 a.m.: One of the Phelps and a bystander, holding a pillow, are having a legal theological debate as the crowd watches, laughs and heckles.

8 a.m.: Just before 8 a.m., the Supreme Court police gave out tickets to the first 100 people in line to get inside. Those people will be able to watch today's proceedings.

Aaron Halloway, a law student from Howard University, was No. 105. He had arrived at 4:30 a.m. He has been studying this case, and its conflicting rights, in Constitutional Law class. "I'm just trying to see how the justices navigate the quagmire."

He's going to stick around. Even if he doesn't get to sit in on the case, he'll get a 3-minute walk-through on the courtroom balcony for a feel for what's happening.

Sean Hillas, of Gwynedd Valley, Pa., a student at American University, is not getting in either. "It's worth it just for the experience. Even if you're in the proximity, it's history. It's best to experience it." He was standing 15 feet away from a collection of Westboro protesters and a counter protester in his underwear, holding a sign "Fred Phelps wishes he were hot like me."

Officials indicated people showed up much earlier than usual to get a seat inside, as this was a high-profile case.

One of the Phelps and a bystander, holding a pillow, are having a legal theological debate as the crowd watches, laughs and heckles.

Updates are being filed today by Daily Record/Sunday News staffers Jeff Frantz, Melissa Nann Burke, Mike Argento and Scott Fisher.

What's happening

At 10 a.m. today, the Supreme Court will hear whether a protest at the military funeral of a York County man's son was free speech or invasion of privacy.

Spring Garden Township's Albert Snyder says the protest in 2006 -- which included signs with slogans such as "Thank God for Dead Soldiers" -- was an attack that left him emotionally harmed. In 2007, a federal jury agreed and awarded him $11 million, later cut to $5 million by a judge.

Westboro Baptist Church members say God is punishing America for accepting homosexuality. They claim that the First Amendment protects what they say at protests -- and a federal appeals court agreed in 2009.

Snyder appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court, which decided earlier this year to take the case.

Sean Summers, attorney for Snyder, will have a half-hour to make his case. Then Margie Phelps will have a half-hour to make Westboro's case.

A decision is expected in the summer of 2011.

That ruling could affect free speech, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and how and where protests can be staged.



ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

· Interactive document: Annotated appeals court decision

· Interactive document: Annotated Snyder appeal accepted by Supreme Court

· Matthew Snyder: A son, and a symbol

· Westboro prepares for its biggest stage

· Find news, background, opinion on Snyder v. Phelps at ydr.com/westboro.

Read more

Other media are following this case:

Topeka Capital-Journal

Washington Post

Christian Science Monitor

MSNBC


People lined up early to get into the Supreme Court building this morning, amid protesters. (Daily Record/Sunday News -- Paul Kuehnel)

Snyder v. Phelps Supreme Court annotated transcript - The York Daily Record

Snyder v. Phelps Supreme Court annotated transcript - The York Daily Record

In Snyder v. Phelps, court put lawyers on the spot - The York Daily Record

In Snyder v. Phelps, court put lawyers on the spot - The York Daily Record

In Snyder v. Phelps, court put lawyers on the spot

Supreme Court justices asked a flurry of questions to try to figure out the broader implications of the case.





WASHINGTON, D.C. - Sean Summers was not 20 seconds into his oral argument Wednesday in Snyder v. Phelps when he heard his first question.

Summers was telling the court that his client, Spring Garden Township's Albert Snyder, had the right to bury his son without Westboro Baptist Church protesting nearby when Associate Justice Antonin Scalia interrupted.

"Are we just talking about a funeral?" Scalia asked. "That's one of the problems I have with the case."

And so began the back and forth exchanges that marked the 30-minute oral arguments for both Summers and Margie Phelps, daughter of the Rev. Fred Phelps and lawyer for the church at which she worships.

Hundreds lined up outside the court for a chance to hear the case that could have a significant impact on the laws governing speech, protest and religion. As people waited, they watched a handful of Phelpses sing and trade thoughts with counter-protestors, while reporters from around the country tried to pick up sound bites.

Inside, the nine justices asked the attorneys about the 2006 military funeral of Snyder's son, Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder, the protests the Phelpses staged outside the Westminster, Md., Catholic church and the Phelpses' internet writings about Matthew Snyder and his parents.

The justices pushed Summers to explain how the Phelpses could have intruded upon Matthew Snyder's funeral if they stood outside the church and left soon after the ceremony began, and if Albert Snyder saw the messages on their signs - including "God hates fags" and "You're going to hell" - only on television.

They asked Margie Phelps when, if not in this case, a private figure could sue for intentional infliction of emotional distress. They wanted to know how far a person or group could go in directing their message at a person, such as Snyder, as long as it was about a matter of public importance. And, they asked why the Phelpses' signs should not be considered fighting words, which are not protected by the First Amendment.

The justices repeatedly pressed both Summers and Phelps to explore broader legal issues beyond the facts of this case.

The court is expected to issue a ruling early next summer.

Snyder: Westboro speech can't be tolerated

Afterward, both sides said their half-hour before the justices went as expected.

"They were absolutely professional and they'll do what their oath requires them to do and that's follow the Constitution, and I'm fully confident they will do that and it will result in a 9-0 majority," Phelps said.

Snyder and his legal team left the court to cheers from the crowd on the sidewalk, including some who had been there since well before sunrise. Summers did not guess at a ruling - "If someone can predict the voting of this court, they should be in Las Vegas" - but did say he thought the court engaged with his arguments.

Snyder thanked his lawyers, the attorneys general and U.S. senators who filed briefs on his behalf, and all his supporters.

"In my opinion, the speech from the Phelpses and the Westboro Baptist Church carries beyond all bounds of decency of what can be tolerated in a civilized nation," Snyder said in his statement.

The Rev. Fred Phelps, patriarch of the Kansas family, was not at the court.

Justices aim for broader implications

At times, the justices attempted to aid both attorneys, neither of whom had appeared before the court.

Early in Summers' argument, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer laid out a potential framework for how the case should be decided:

"... do you think that a person can put anything on the Internet? Do you think they can put anything on television even if it attacks, say, the most private things of a private individual? Does Maryland's - does Maryland's law actually prohibit that? Do we know it does, and what should the rules be there?

"Have I said enough to get you talking?"

Breyer repeatedly asked both attorneys about how a rule should be structured if the court were to carve out a new understanding of intentional infliction of emotional distress laws. After arguments, Summers said he took these questions to be a good sign.

The justices posed more hypothetical situations to Margie Phelps to test her assertion that Westboro's actions be protected under the First Amendment.

What would happen, Associate Justice Elena Kagan asked, if a protestor could follow a veteran to his workplace with signs saying he was a war criminal. Associate Justice Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. wanted to know if a person opposed to a war could meet the grandmother of a fallen soldier at a bus stop outside a cemetery and "speak in the most vile terms" about her grandson.

Margie Phelps said the Westboro Baptist Church did not do those things. Still, she said, the statements should be protected since they were about public speech, provided the speaker did not violate stalking laws or use fighting words.

Is Westboro 'exploiting a private family's grief'?


Since the justices agreed to hear the case, court watchers have wondered if Margie Phelps would be able to distance herself from her father and family members.

For most of her half-hour, she did, though a few times she used "we" to describe Westboro. Once, when describing why the Phelpses should be allowed to tell Albert Snyder why Matthew was killed, Margie Phelps drifted close to her picket-line preaching.

"Then a little church where the servants of God are found say, we have an answer to your question that you put in the public airwaves and our answer is you have got to stop sinning if you want this trauma to stop happening -" Phelps said before Chief Justice John Roberts interrupted to ask another question.

Margie Phelps repeatedly tried to assert Snyder should be considered a public figure because he criticized the war in Iraq in interviews after his son's death, but the justices did not seem to agree, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor started several questions by asking her what her argument would be if Snyder were not considered a public figure.

The justices also wanted to know why Westboro should be allowed to protest outside a funeral if it was allowed to hold its protests elsewhere, such as the Maryland statehouse or the Naval Academy, which it did on the same day as Matthew Snyder's funeral.

"This is a question about exploiting a private family's grief," Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said. "The question is: Why should the First Amendment tolerate exploiting this bereaved family when you have so many other forums for getting - getting across your message, the very same day you did?"

When asked during his rebuttal argument if a more generic anti-war funeral protest, one that did not target a soldier's family, would be protected by the First Amendment, Summers said it likely would. Then, before he could make another point, the chief justice ended arguments.

"Thank you Mr. Summers," he said. "The case is submitted."

New Testament News: Coldest Winter In 1.000 Years On Its Way

New Testament News: Coldest Winter In 1.000 Years On Its Way


Russia Today reports the coming winter could be the coldest Europe has seen in the last 1.000 years.

Presently I live in beautiful Lyon in France, since June this year.

The past ten years I have lived in Belgium and in Sweden, and I can confirm that each winter has been longer and colder than the previous one.

I don't like the rhetoric of some politicians, like Al Gore, who talks about global warming.

Keep the Faith: Vatican: Dialogue takes more than talking

Keep the Faith: Vatican: Dialogue takes more than talking

“Voicing opposite positions and irreconcilable ideologies is not truly dialogue, said Archbishop Dominique Mamberti, Vatican secretary for relations with states, at a recent UN General Assembly. Rather, he said, “true dialogue means exchanging and sharing wisdom.”

Dialogue, said the archbishop, extends to the “exchange of words and the search for balance between opposite interests to a real sharing of wisdom for the common good.”

Who is to define “wisdom” and the “common good?” Through these moral and ethical terms, Rome is telling the UN that their actions need to be defined by her moral teaching.

The Archbishop however affirmed that the UN was still of great interest to the Holy See, as the overall agenda of the UN is to unite the nations of the world under a new world order.

Archbishop Mamberti said that the history of human rights “shows that respect for religious liberty, which includes the right to express one’s faith publicly and to spread it, is the essential stone of the whole building of human rights,” the prelate affirmed.

Becoming the champion of Religious Liberty is ironic since throughout the dark ages, Rome was its destroyer.

“The pacific tone of Rome in the United States does not imply a change of heart. She is tolerant where she is helpless. Says Bishop O’Connor: ‘Religious liberty is merely endured until the opposite can be carried into effect without peril to the Catholic world…’ The archbishop of St. Louis once said: ‘Heresy and unbelief are crimes; and in Christian countries, as in Italy and Spain, for instance, where all the people are Catholics, and where the Catholic religion is an essential part of the law of the land, they are punished as other crimes…’” Great Controversy, p. 565.

EndrTimes: “Obama always carries a picture of Mary Help of Christians in his wallet”

EndrTimes: “Obama always carries a picture of Mary Help of Christians in his wallet”

During her visit to Casa Don Bosco in Ronda, Michelle Obama, wife of Barack, revealed that her husband, the President of the United States, “always carries a picture of Mary Help of Christians in his wallet”.

EndrTimes: Activists Assess Progress Toward Millennium Development Goals

EndrTimes: Activists Assess Progress Toward Millennium Development Goals

P.S.

1Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.

2Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

3But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:

4That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.

Matthew 6:1-4.

US economic growth will lag behind global rate, IMF forecasts - CSMonitor.com

US economic growth will lag behind global rate, IMF forecasts - CSMonitor.com

The world’s economic growth rate will be 4.8 percent this year, while the US rate will be 2.6 percent, the IMF predicted Wednesday.

Even Cuba finally gets it: Capitalism works - CSMonitor.com

Even Cuba finally gets it: Capitalism works - CSMonitor.com

Cuba's regime recently acknowledged the failures of its centralized system – eyeing the growing list of communist countries shifting successfully toward free-market economies. As capitalism makes inroads, will political freedoms follow?

What Supreme Court justices asked at Westboro Baptist Church hearing - CSMonitor.com

What Supreme Court justices asked at Westboro Baptist Church hearing - CSMonitor.com

In a classic battle over free speech in America, the US Supreme Court on Wednesday took up the case

adventistapocalypse.com

adventistapocalypse.com

What Adventists Need to Know About the End of Days!

Utilizing Scripture with Spirit of Prophecy as a key, author Marilyn Campbell has combed through the writings of Ellen White for information regarding the future final crisis, with astounding results. Discover solid answers to such questions as:

  • What triggers the final crisis?
  • How long does the final crisis last?
  • What is the correct chronology of final crisis event? (No dates are suggested for any event)
  • Which comes first, National Sunday Law or Latter Rain?
  • At what point does the slaughter of Ezekiel 9 take place?
  • What are the seven thunders, and at what point do they reveal themselves?
  • When does Satan appear personating Christ?
  • What do the 5th, 6th, and 7th angels of Revelation 14 represent?
  • Where in Revelation 14 do we find the 4th Angel?
  • What is the actual three angels’ message?
  • What is the “order” in which Revelation unfolds?
  • What events ends the 1335 days of Daniel 12?
  • What is the warning in Daniel 12?
  • … and much, much more

Valuable to firm believers

This work will be most valuable to firm believers in the prophetic ministry of Ellen White. Uriah Smith’s Daniel and the Revelation, the basis of Adventist prophetic interpretation for many years (even to today) utilized established Protestant commentaries, such as those of Adam Clarke, Thomas Newton, Matthew Henry, Edward Gibbons, and many others in support of its prophetic understandings.

The Seventh Era follows Smith’s practice, except that, instead of the valued but human opinions of uninspired men, Ellen White’s inspired views form the basis of its prophetic interpretations.

“A message will soon be given by God’s appointment that will swell into a loud cry. Then Daniel will stand in his lot, to give his testimony.” (Letter 54, 1/30/1906).

Funeral protests and free speech | Open thread | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Funeral protests and free speech | Open thread | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

How should the US supreme court rule on whether religious protests at soldiers' funerals have first amendment protection?

John Henry Newman's last act of friendship | Mark Vernon | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

John Henry Newman's last act of friendship | Mark Vernon | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Why was John Henry Newman buried in a shared grave with Ambrose St John? It was his express wish – of St John he wrote: "From the first he loved me with an intensity of love, which was unaccountable" – and has been used to claim he is a gay saint.

PressTV - Ahmadinejad writes to Pope Benedict XVI

PressTV - Ahmadinejad writes to Pope Benedict XVI

THE ISLAMIC BROTHERHOOD BOWING DOWN TO THEIR SECRET MASTER THE PONTIFEX MAXIMUS

Rabbi declares sleeping with the enemy kosher

Rabbi declares sleeping with the enemy kosher

New strategy for officer testing Obama’s eligibility | Western Journalism.com

New strategy for officer testing Obama’s eligibility | Western Journalism.com

Eric Schmidt: Google gets close to ‘the creepy line’ | Western Journalism.com

Eric Schmidt: Google gets close to ‘the creepy line’ | Western Journalism.com

Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google, has described his company’s policy: “Google policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.”

Schmidt was talking to The Atlantic about the possibility of a Google implant – a chip under your skin that would track you and provide easy web access. That, Schmidt said, was probably over ‘the creepy line’.

However, he followed that by saying: “With your permission you give us more information about you, about your friends, and we can improve the quality of our searches. We don’t need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”

Some might argue that that is over the line too but Google will only read your mind “with your permission”, so that’s a relief.

Schmidt has a history of attention-grabbing and quotable statements about Google’s increasing, err, creep into our lives. There was the time that he said: “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.” Recently he has suggested that young people might in future change their names so as to escape their Google-able past.

Hot Video: Never Gonna Stand for this

Hot Video: Never Gonna Stand for this

Obama as Roman Emperor – The Rise and Fall of the Propaganda Master | Western Journalism.com

Obama as Roman Emperor – The Rise and Fall of the Propaganda Master | Western Journalism.com

The doctor, the president and the birth certificate | Western Journalism.com

The doctor, the president and the birth certificate | Western Journalism.com

Craig Oxley’s New Video on Things to Come with the Fall of Western Civilization | Vatican Assassins

Craig Oxley’s New Video on Things to Come with the Fall of Western Civilization | Vatican Assassins

The Vatican Lobby: Vatican Hosts Conference on Catholic Media

The Vatican Lobby: Vatican Hosts Conference on Catholic Media

Power Hackers: The U.S. Smart Grid Is Shaping Up to Be Dangerously Insecure: Scientific American

Power Hackers: The U.S. Smart Grid Is Shaping Up to Be Dangerously Insecure: Scientific American

Catch a thief from your armchair and win cash | Reuters

Catch a thief from your armchair and win cash | Reuters

Catch a thief from your armchair and win cash

LONDON | Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:29pm EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Anyone who owns a laptop computer can now fight crime from the safety of their home and win cash prizes for catching thieves red-handed, under a new British monitoring scheme that went live this week.

The service works by employing an army of registered armchair snoopers who watch hours of CCTV footage from cameras in stores and high street venues across the country.

Viewers can win up to 1,000 pounds ($1,600) in cash a month from Devon-based firm Internet Eyes, which distributes the streaming footage, when offenders are caught in the act.

The scheme immediately drew criticism from civil liberties campaigners who say it is more evidence that Britain has become a "Big Brother" surveillance society with CCTV on every corner.

Participants, who pay a fee to subscribe, press an "alert" button which relays an instant text message notifying a shop keeper of suspicious behavior. The SMS is followed up with a photographic image of the potential crime.

Founder of Internet Eyes, Tony Morgan, says the scheme puts shop owners back in control of security and allows local communities to tackle crime and anti-social behavior.

"The problem with CCTV is that while cameras are practically everywhere, there's hardly anyone watching them in real time," Morgan said. "Most people know this, so CCTV is no longer the deterrent it used to be, and crime is rising."

Industry body, the Center for Retail Research, says shoplifting is at record levels, costing the UK economy almost 5 billion pounds a year.

Registered participants in the scheme must be over 18, are not able to choose which footage they see, nor view premises in their local area.

The firm told Reuters it has 13,500 interested viewers from across the European Union and aims to have 3,000 paid-up members by the end of October.

The government's Information Commissioner's Office says the firm is being made to comply with data protection laws and has also insisted on background checks on viewers employed by the site.

But Charles Farrier of campaign group NO CCTV said the launch marked another disturbing chapter in the nation's surveillance society.

"The Information Commissioner has put private profit above personal privacy in allowing a private company to launch its Stasi-style citizen spy game rather than defending the rights of British citizens," he said.

The director of another group, Big Brother Watch said it was a worrying development akin to "pimping out" CCTV images to amateur bounty hunters and should be switched off.

"Innocent people out doing their shopping shouldn't be snooped on like this," Alex Deane told Reuters.

"Whatever one thinks of our surveillance culture, we can all agree that the technology is better off in the hands of trained, accountable professionals rather than voyeurs."

(Editing by Steve Addison)

Keep the Faith: Economy in Dire Straits forecasts Social Unrest

Keep the Faith: Economy in Dire Straits forecasts Social Unrest

EndrTimes: Muslim Cleric: "The Flag of Islam will one day fly over the White House"

EndrTimes: Muslim Cleric: "The Flag of Islam will one day fly over the White House"

EndrTimes: The New Age Agenda (Pt.1)

EndrTimes: The New Age Agenda (Pt.1)

Millions of Filipinos receive Adventist literature last weekend - Adventist News Network

Millions of Filipinos receive Adventist literature last weekend - Adventist News Network

Yale University Questions Police Who Tasered Student During Club Raid - ABC News

Yale University Questions Police Who Tasered Student During Club Raid - ABC News

Homeland Security Addresses Terror Alert Full Episode - World News with Diane Sawyer - ABC News

Homeland Security Addresses Terror Alert Full Episode - World News with Diane Sawyer - ABC News

Zbigniew Brzezinski:- Fears The Mass Global Awakening.

Lexology - Church’s trademark valid even though religions cannot be trademarked

Lexology - Church’s trademark valid even though religions cannot be trademarked

Addressing the issue of whether a church can claim trademark protection, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a denial of a defendant pastor’s motion to dismiss and affirmed a partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs that the pastor’s use of the “Seventh Day Adventist” mark created a likelihood of confusion.

Our Sunday Visitor president sees challenges and hopes for US Catholic press :: Catholic News Agency (CNA)

Our Sunday Visitor president sees challenges and hopes for US Catholic press :: Catholic News Agency (CNA)

.- The Catholic press in the United States faces the challenges of writing for a Catholic population with a weakening identity and a distrust of institutions, the president of Our Sunday Visitor publishing has noted. However, he sees causes for hope in new technologies and a new generation of writers and editors.

Speaking to a meeting of the Catholic Press Congress (CPC) in Rome on Monday, Gregory Erlandson of Indiana-based publishing house Our Sunday Visitor drew on his 30 years of experience as a Catholic reporter and publisher.

“It has been a very challenging field really since the Second Vatican Council, but most certainly since the 1990s. In the United States, Mass attendance, attendance at Catholic schools, numbers of priestly vocations, marriages, baptisms and more have all drifted lower,” he commented, noting that surveys suggest Catholic practice is in decline.

“On the surface our Catholic media remains quite vital,” he said.

There are four major Catholic national weekly papers, 140 diocesan newspapers, and more than 100 magazines and major newsletters. There is a major Catholic television network in EWTN, more than 160 Catholic radio stations, and dozens of Catholic book publishers.

“But appearances can be deceiving,” he warned, noting the great financial stress on most publications. Those which are not owned by dioceses have generally seen a decline, as have diocesan newspapers which often benefit from mandatory purchases.

The internet has had an impact on the Catholic press, with business models being “unclear or rapidly changing.” Changing demography is also a factor, with fewer young people being interested in Catholic news.

Erlandson listed three special problems for the Catholic press: a decline in knowledge about the faith; a growing distrust of institutions; and a resulting decline in Catholic identity.

“(W)e now have two generations of Catholics who have been significantly under-catechized in their own faith. A larger and larger share of our potential audience often does not understand Catholic vocabulary or Catholic concepts.”

He cited University of Notre Dame professor John Cavadini, who has said contemporary religious illiteracy is worse than partial blindness but something like “retinal detachment” in which “the system in which the words (of Catholicism) made sense is failing.”

Many publications are dependent on a shrinking older audience while many Catholics have a poor understanding of what the Church teaches and why.

Discussing the distrust of institutions, Erlandson said the sexual abuse crisis perhaps made this worse for the Church but that the lack of trust is part of broader cultural trends. There is a kind of “congregationalism” in the Church where Catholics feel less of a bond with the bishop or with national and international Catholic institutions even though they may like their priest and their parish.

The secular media shares this distrust and most Catholics get most of their news from this source.

“The result is both a latent suspicion of Church authorities and a lack of a felt need to know what the Church is saying about social or spiritual matters, two primary reasons to read the Catholic press,” he commented.

The decline of Catholic identity is shown in the greater likelihood of Catholics moving to Protestant or non-denominational churches. “They view all churches as more or less the same,” he said. The lack of knowledge of the faith has led in turn to an inability to distinguish what is truly unique about the faith. This also means that there is less of an impulse to seek out Catholic-identified books and publications.”

Turning to positive developments, Erlandson noted that the internet allows the Catholic press to reach a diverse audience in a cost-effective way. There is “significant and growing” Catholic use of the internet, with many websites and blogs.

“While usage of digital means of communications is constantly changing, more and more Catholics are accessible, at least in theory, through these means,” he said.

While it is “critically important” that Catholics receive sound information, the oversight of the Church does not work well for new media. Without accountability, Erlandson noted, there is a risk of “a Babel of voices claiming to be Catholic.”

Another positive aspect was Church leaders’ increasing awareness that most Catholics get their news about the Church from the secular media, an often unreliable source.

“My hope is that Church leaders are seeing that if they value their own media, and if they allow them to be transparent and honest, they will gain in credibility over the long haul. To do this well, however, will mean changing the media expectations of an institution that often sees its first responsibility to protect itself from bad news.”

Erlandson also saw the arrival of a new generation of Catholic editors, writers and publishers who understand their role in bolstering Catholic identity.

“This does not mean becoming mere propagandists, but it does mean becoming collaborators with the Church, recognizing that professional news coverage and solid features and special reports can genuinely help the adult faith formation of our Catholic audience,” he explained.

Cardinal Newman desired a laity who know their religion so well they can give an account of it, Erlandson said. So too must Catholic publishers need to shape an informed Catholic laity willing to engage the world and to value the Catholic press as a means of deepening their own understanding.

Hundreds of representatives from at least 85 countries are attending the four-day Catholic Press Conference, which is sponsored by the Pontifical Council for Social Communications (PCCS).

Sex abuse victim sues St. Catharines diocese - thestar.com

Sex abuse victim sues St. Catharines diocese - thestar.com

Nienstedt denies communion to GLBT button students - WKBT La Crosse, WI-NewsChannel 8-

Nienstedt denies communion to GLBT button students - WKBT La Crosse, WI-NewsChannel 8-
Several students from St. John's University and the College of St. Benedict say the Catholic archbishop of St. Paul and Minneapolis refused to serve them communion because they were wearing rainbow buttons that signaled membership in a gay and lesbian student group.

Catholics, Lutherans to celebrate covenant - Canton, OH - CantonRep.com

Catholics, Lutherans to celebrate covenant - Canton, OH - CantonRep.com

Iran: Sakineh's children ask Italy for asylum - Adnkronos Politics

The children of an Iranian woman condemned to death by stoning for adultery and killing her husband are asking Italy for asylum after feeling threatened by security authorities at home.


Pope's Scientist Would be Happy to Baptize an Intelligent Extraterrestrial : Discovery News