ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

House panel votes 23-17 to place Holder in contempt of Congress

By Jordy Yager

A House panel voted Wednesday to place Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for his failure to comply with a subpoena, defying an assertion of executive privilege from President Obama.
The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Republican Chairman Darrell Issa (Calif.), approved a resolution along party lines to place Holder in contempt after battling him for months over access to internal agency documents about the gun-tracking operation known as "Fast and Furious."
The vote came after Obama escalated the conflict by sending a letter to the committee claiming executive privilege over the documents the panel had sought.
All 23 Republicans on the committee voted for the contempt resolution, while all 17 Democrats voted against it. Every member of the panel was present for the vote.
Minutes after the panel's decision, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) announced that the full House will vote on the contempt measure next week.
"While we had hoped it would not come to this, unless the attorney general reevaluates his choice and supplies the promised documents, the House will vote to hold him in contempt next week," the Republican leaders said in a statement. "If, however, Attorney General Holder produces these documents prior to the scheduled vote, we will give the Oversight Committee an opportunity to review in hopes of resolving this issue."
Holder blasted Issa in a statement following the vote while touting the efforts the DOJ has made to try and meet the chairman's demands.

"From the beginning, Chairman Issa and certain members of the committee have made unsubstantiated allegations first, then scrambled for facts to try to justify them later," said Holder.

"That might make for good political theater, but it does little to uncover the truth or address the problems associated with this operation and prior ones dating back to the previous administration."
Obama’s move to bring the Fast and Furious documents under executive privilege came just minutes before the panel began the contempt proceedings. In the letter announcing Obama’s decision, Deputy Attorney General James Cole argued DOJ has made “extraordinary efforts to accommodate the committee’s legitimate oversight interests.”

More from The Hill:
♦ Obama asserts executive privilege ahead of vote
♦ Obama criticized Bush over executive privilege
♦ White House move sets off questions over 'Fast and Furious'
♦ NRA to score Holder contempt vote
♦ Supreme Court experts predict justices will strike down mandate
♦ House panel votes to limit abortion under Obama's health law
♦ House panel urges Obama to fight UN regulation of the Internet
♦ Bid to kill EPA coal plant regs thwarted in Senate

“The information provided to the Committee shows clearly that the Department leadership did not intend to mislead Congress in the February 4 letter or in any other statements concerning Fast and Furious,” Cole said in the letter.
Issa said the assertion of privilege by Obama fell short of any reason to delay the vote against Holder.
Four amendments were offered to the contempt resolution, including one by Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) that would have postponed the contempt move until the committee investigated the “gun-walking” instances that occurred under former President George W. Bush’s administration.
“Does it make sense to take a little but more time to work this out?” asked Welch, before his amendment was defeated along party lines by Republicans.
The high-stakes move against the attorney general came after talks to avoid the contempt vote fell apart Tuesday evening.
Holder attempted to exchange the requested documents for an agreement from Issa to drop his two subpoenas and the contempt measure. But the powerful Republican balked at anything short of a full document production while making no guarantees in return.
Issa wants documents that he says would show how much Justice knows about Fast and Furious, a controversial gun-tracking operation run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Holder has insisted he did not know of the operation.
Obama has denied knowledge of Fast and Furious, but Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Obama's assertion of executive privilege raises "monumental questions" about whether the White House was involved in the authorization of or the fallout from the botched operation.
"How can the president assert executive privilege if there was no White House involvement? How can the president exert executive privilege over documents he's supposedly never seen?" Grassley said in a statement. "Is something very big being hidden to go to this extreme?"
A spokesman for Boehner questioned whether Obama is “bending the law to hide the truth.”
"Until now, everyone believed that the decisions regarding Fast and Furious were confined to the Department of Justice,” Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said in a statement. “The White House decision to invoke executive privilege implies that White House officials were either involved in the Fast and Furious operation or the cover-up that followed. The administration has always insisted that wasn't the case. Were they lying, or are they now bending the law to hide the truth?”
Democrats on the Oversight panel were indignant about Wednesday's vote. Rep. Ed Towns (D-N.Y.), a former chairman of the Oversight committee, ripped Issa for the way he has conducted the Fast and Furious investigation, calling it the “most ridiculous thing” he has seen in his years on the panel.
“I think this is a mistake, a major mistake,” Towns said. “It’s a discredit to this committee.”
The Congressional Tri-Caucus, meanwhile, condemned the move as “politics at its worst.” The caucus consists of nearly 80, mostly Democratic members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) and the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus.
“This is an extremely low moment in our body politic,” said Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Ill.), the chairman of the CBC. “The cause for civility has been met by an unnecessary and unfortunate partisanship.”
The pressure on the Obama administration over Fast and Furious has been building for months.
Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) garnered the support of 114 Republicans for a separate resolution that would express Congress’s lack of confidence in Holder and essentially call for him to step down because of how he has handled the operation.
Even with 242 Republicans in the House majority, it remains unclear whether the contempt measure would have the backing of the full caucus. Many GOP members have resisted action on the Fast and Furious issue out of a desire to keep the 2012 election focus on the economy and jobs.
In the past, the mere threat of contempt has been enough to compel the Justice Department to produce the documents requested by Congress, and the House has only voted on one contempt resolution in recent years. That resolution passed the Democratic-controlled House largely along party lines, but then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey, under Bush, refused to enforce the contempt measure against two senior White House officials, citing executive privilege.
If the measure against Holder passes the House, it will be sent to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, who will convene a grand jury that would decide whether to indict Holder. The U.S. Attorney’s office would be the designated prosecutor for the committee if Holder were to be indicted. The attorney general would face a maximum sentence of one year in prison if convicted by a jury.
Fast and Furious was an attempt by the Justice Department's Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) to track the flow of weapons from the United States into Mexico by drug cartels in hopes of dismantling their network. Nearly 2,000 guns were sold in the United States to straw buyers for the cartels, but instead of tracking the weapons, ATF agents were ordered to let them go with the hope of rediscovering them later at a crime scene or drug bust. Hundreds were lost.
The Department of Justice's inspector general, at the request of Holder, has been investigating Fast and Furious for more than a year. Issa has been conducting his own probe.

Chicago Police Department Partners With 20 Churches To Hold Gun Turn In Drive

 

This weekend in Chicago you can receive a $100 gift card all for the price of your right to bear arms and further obedience as SHEEP to the jack booted thugs.
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/06/19/police-to-hold-gun-turn-in-event-this-weekend/


I guess POTUS feels the whole nation should fall in line with his hometown via the UN Arms Trade Treaty.At least there are a few reps that are opposing this.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/11770-two-more-senators-support-bill-opposing-un-arms-trade-treaty

» Ron Paul Reacts To Black Man's Testimony Video Alex Jones' Infowars

TrutherGirl Infiltrates NWO Conference!

Elites Admit Violent Revolution Imminent: NWO Conference Part 2

Talk of drones patrolling US skies spawns anxiety

WASHINGTON (AP) — The prospect that thousands of drones could be patrolling U.S. skies by the end of this decade is raising the specter of a Big Brother government that peers into backyards and bedrooms.
The worries began mostly on the political margins, but there are signs that ordinary people are starting to fret that unmanned aircraft could soon be circling overhead.
Jeff Landry, a freshman Republican congressman from Louisiana's coastal bayou country, said constituents have stopped him while shopping at Walmart to talk about it.
"There is a distrust amongst the people who have come and discussed this issue with me about our government," Landry said. "It's raising an alarm with the American public."
Another GOP freshman, Rep. Austin Scott, said he first learned of the issue when someone shouted out a question about drones at a Republican Party meeting in his Georgia congressional district two months ago.
An American Civil Liberties Union lobbyist, Chris Calabrese, said that when he speaks to audiences about privacy issues generally, drones are what "everybody just perks up over."
"People are interested in the technology, they are interested in the implications and they worry about being under surveillance from the skies," he said.
The level of apprehension is especially high in the conservative blogosphere, where headlines blare "30,000 Armed Drones to be Used Against Americans" and "Government Drones Set to Spy on Farms in the United States."
When Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican, suggested during an interview on Washington radio station WTOP last month that drones be used by police domestically since they've done such a good job on foreign battlefields, the political backlash was swift. NetRightDaily complained: "This seems like something a fascist would do. ... McDonnell isn't pro-Big Government, he is pro-HUGE Government."
John Whitehead, president of the Rutherford Institute of Charlottesville, Va., which provides legal assistance in support of civil liberties and conservative causes, warned the governor, "America is not a battlefield, and the citizens of this nation are not insurgents in need of vanquishing."
There's concern as well among liberal civil liberties advocates that government and private-sector drones will be used to gather information on Americans without their knowledge. A lawsuit by the Electronic Frontier Foundation of San Francisco, whose motto is "defending your rights in the digital world," forced the Federal Aviation Administration earlier this year to disclose the names of dozens of public universities, police departments and other government agencies that have been awarded permission to fly drones in civilian airspace on an experimental basis.
Giving drones greater access to U.S. skies moves the nation closer to "a surveillance society in which our every move is monitored, tracked, recorded and scrutinized by the authorities," the ACLU warned last December in a report.
The anxiety has spilled over into Congress, where a bipartisan group of lawmakers have been meeting to discuss legislation that would broadly address the civil-liberty issues raised by drones. A Landry provision in a defense spending bill would prohibit information gathered by military drones without a warrant from being used as evidence in court. A provision that Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., added to another bill would prohibit the Homeland Security Department from arming its drones, including ones used to patrol the border.
Scott and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., have introduced identical bills to prohibit any government agency from using a drone to "gather evidence or other information pertaining to criminal conduct or conduct in violation of a regulation" without a warrant.
"I just don't like the concept of drones flying over barbecues in New York to see whether you have a Big Gulp in your backyard or whether you are separating out your recyclables according to the city mandates," Paul said in an interview, referring to a New York City ban on supersized soft drinks.
He acknowledged that is an "extreme example," but added: "They might just say we'd be safer from muggings if we had constant surveillance crisscrossing the street all the time. But then the question becomes, what about jaywalking? What about eating too many donuts? What about putting mayonnaise on your hamburger? Where does it stop?"
Calabrese, the ACLU lobbyist, called Paul's office as soon as he heard about the bill.
"I told them we think they are starting from the right place," Calabrese said. "You should need some kind of basis before you use a drone to spy on someone."
In a Congress noted for its political polarization, legislation to check drone use has the potential to forge "a left-right consensus," he said. "It bothers us for a lot of the same reasons it bothers conservatives."
The backlash has drone makers concerned. The drone market is expected to nearly double over the next 10 years, from current worldwide expenditures of nearly $6 billion annually to more than $11 billion, with police departments accounting for a significant part of that growth.
"We go into this with every expectation that the laws governing public safety and personal privacy will not be administered any differently for (drones) than they are for any other law enforcement tool," said Dan Elwell, vice president of the Aerospace Industries Association.
Discussion of the issue has been colored by exaggerated drone tales spread largely by conservative media and bloggers.
Scott said he was prompted to introduce his bill in part by news reports that the Environmental Protection Agency has been using drones to spy on cattle ranchers in Nebraska. The agency has indeed been searching for illegal dumping of waste into streams but is doing it the old-fashioned way, with piloted planes.
In another case, a forecast of 30,000 drones in U.S. skies by 2020 has been widely attributed to the FAA. But FAA spokeswoman Brie Sachse said the agency has no idea where the figure came from. It may be a mangled version of an aerospace industry forecast that there could be nearly 30,000 drones worldwide by 2018, with the United States accounting for half of them.
Fear that some drones may be armed has been fueled in part by a county sheriff's office in Texas that used a homeland security grant to buy a $300,000, 50-pound ShadowHawk helicopter drone for its SWAT team. The drone can be equipped with a 40mm grenade launcher and a 12-gauge shotgun. Randy McDaniel, chief deputy with the Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, told The Associated Press earlier this year his office had no plans to arm the drone, but he left open the possibility the agency may decide to adapt the drone to fire tear gas canisters and rubber bullets.
Earlier this year Congress, under pressure from the Defense Department and the drone manufacturers, ordered the FAA to give drones greater access to civilian airspace by 2015. Besides the military, the mandate applies to drones operated by the private sector and civilian government agencies, including federal, state and local law enforcement.
Reps. Ed Markey, D-Mass, and Joe Barton, R-Texas, co-chairs of a congressional privacy caucus, asked the FAA in April how it plans to protect privacy as it develops regulations for integrating drones into airspace now exclusively used by aircraft with human pilots. There's been no response so far, but Acting FAA Administrator Michael Huerta will probably be asked about it when he testifies at a Senate hearing Thursday.
Even if the FAA were to establish privacy rules, it's primarily a safety agency and wouldn't have the expertise or regulatory structure to enforce them, civil liberties advocates said. But no other government agency is addressing the issue, either, they said.
___
Follow Joan Lowy at http://www.twitter.com/AP_Joan_Lowy
___
Online:
http://www.faa.gov

Personal Liberty Alerts

Personal Liberty Alerts: Live Free in an Unfree World

Latest From Brandon Smith June 19, 2012
Community Vs. Collectivism Community Vs. Collectivism »
Collectivism is a psychological prison derived from a beneficial instinct as old as humanity itself: the instinct to connect with others, to share experiences and knowledge, to build and create together. Collectivism uses this instinct as a weapon. In this age, our ideas of what constitutes "community" have been tainted and confused with the propaganda of collectivists. More »


Outside The Asylum

Si Se Puede!: The Imperial Presidency of Barack Obama Si Se Puede!: The Imperial Presidency of Barack Obama »
Had I been present in the Rose Garden when President Barack Obama issued his royal proclamation decreeing essential amnesty to 1.4 million illegal aliens, I would not have interrupted "his majesty" the way The Daily Caller's Neil Munro did on Friday.  More »

Personal Liberty News

Ron Paul Supporters Will Fight Forever Ron Paul Supporters Will Fight Forever »
Ron Paul spoke to his supporters last week and urged them not to give up demanding that the ideals of the Revolution he has helped to spark become main staples of the Republican platform when the party meets in Tampa, Fla., in August. But for many of Paul's supporters, giving up has never been an option anyway. More »



World Governments Increasingly Demand Internet Censorship World Governments Increasingly Demand Internet Censorship »
Governments throughout the world are requesting that Internet companies censor large amounts of online content, and the usual suspects aren't the only countries involved. This from a new semi-annual transparency report put together by the search engine giant Google. More »

Obama Attempts To Improve Economy By Placing Restrictions On Soot Obama Attempts To Improve Economy By Placing Restrictions On Soot »
The Administration of Barack Obama is proposing tighter restrictions on soot. The current standard for factories is 15 micrograms per cubic meter of air. But Democrats believe it is "an absolute necessity" to tighten the standard to 13 micrograms per cubic meter of air. More »

Obama's Temper Flares After Reporter Asks Question Obama's Temper Flares After Reporter Asks Question »
After President Barack Obama's Administration announced that the United States would stop deporting illegal aliens who were brought to the U.S. as children, the President made a speech. One reporter didn't like the speech.  More »


Bob's Health Tip

Honey Can Help Heal Cuts And Burns

In ancient Egypt honey was used to help heal cuts and burns. Hippocrates used it on skin problems. Romans used it for cleansing wounds.

Now, centuries later, scientists are discovering that this prized bee product can be good modern medicine — especially as a dressing to prevent burns and wounds from becoming infected. One study published in the Cochrane Library showed that honey may promote faster healing of mild or moderate burns than regular dressings, and other studies have shown that honey can aid in healing wounds. More »


WND News Alerts

WorldNetDaily.com


Chicago in midst of an unreported race war
What in the world is going on in Chicago with all the violence recently? And what is up with the city's major newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, which says all the mayhem is irrelevant?
Read the latest now on WND.com.
Plus!
Now the Pentagon is actually celebrating homosexual behavior.
Click here for details.
And evidence of Credit Suisse fraud mounts
There's mounting evidence Credit Suisse Group AG has committed criminal violations in the trading of U.S. mortgage-backed securities. We've got the latest.
Click here for details.

Must Read News
Other Highlights
    Woman arrested for 'groping' TSA agent
  • No joke! 5,000 ducks cross a road
Make WND your homepage today!
Daily Blessing

Your daily dose of spiritual inspiration
Today's Scripture reading from the Holy Bible
Joke Of The Day
Today's Poll

The Cowboy Byte

CowboyByte
June 20, 2012 News and Thoughts for the day
Today's Cowboy Headlines: Headlines you might have missed: Today's Featured Article:

White House Readies Ramming Speed if Supremes Strike Down Mandate

Follow Cowboy Byte on TWITTER!

Join Cowboy Byte on FACEBOOK!

Personal Liberty Alerts

Personal Liberty Alerts: Live Free in an Unfree World

Latest From John Myers June 20, 2012
Will Bernanke Buy An Obama Victory? Will Bernanke Buy An Obama Victory? »
The economy could not be collapsing at a worse time for President Barack Obama. But Obama has a powerful ally in the Federal Reserve. The central bank is set to launch a third round of quantitative easing (QE3) to keep interest rates artificially low and perhaps rescue his Presidency.  More »


Freedom Watch

War Clouds War Clouds »
The clouds of a Mideast war are growing darker by the day. The United States is using al-Qaida-aligned terrorists to overthrow the Bashar Assad regime just as it did to overthrow Moammar Gadhafi in Libya. Meanwhile, the drumbeat for an attack on Iran grows louder and stronger. More »

Personal Liberty News

U.N. Investigator: Obama's Drones Violate Human Rights U.N. Investigator: Obama's Drones Violate Human Rights »
A U.N. investigator wants some answers regarding President Barack Obama's penchant for carrying out targeted drone attacks overseas that routinely result in civilian casualties. The United States uses military drones to carry out attacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen and Somalia.  More »





Border Patrol Union: Holder Must Resign Border Patrol Union: Holder Must Resign »
Attorney General Eric Holder's involvement and alleged dishonesty about Operation Fast and Furious — the fatally flawed Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives-led "gunwalking" scheme — has led the Border Patrol union to call for Holder's resignation. More »

Summertime Blues For Teen Job Seekers Summertime Blues For Teen Job Seekers »
If your teenager has neglected to find a summer job since the end of the school year this year, don't be too disappointed: It may have more to do with the economy than motivation. For the third year in a row, teens seeking summer employment face a hiring slump.  More »

The Most Pesticide-Laden Produce, And Healthier Alternatives The Most Pesticide-Laden Produce, And Healthier Alternatives »
A new report from the Environmental Working Group shows which varieties of commercial produce are the most and the least contaminated by agricultural pesticides. EWG presents updated information on 45 popular fruits and vegetables and their total pesticide loads. More »


Political Cartoon

Grilled By Congress



R. J. Matson, The St. Louis Post Dispatch
 More »


Ron Paul: There's "No Way" I'm Ready to Endorse Romney

American Vision News

The Conservative Byte

ConservativeByte
June 20, 2012
Today's Politically Incorrect Headlines: Today's Featured Article: Obama Asserts Executive Privilege on Fast and Furious

Today's Politically Incorrect Laugh:
(Click to Enlarge)
Obama evolves

Follow Conservative Byte on TWITTER!
Join Conservative Byte on FACEBOOK!

Rand Paul Rips Romney for Saying He Could Fight Iran Without Congress

Though he has endorsed the presumptive GOP nominee, the senator took to National Review Online to assert Congress's role in declaring war.

Rand Paul full.jpg

Reuters

After Senator Rand Paul endorsed Mitt Romney, he got grief from a lot of his libertarian supporters, especially after the GOP nominee stated that the president can wage war on Iran without Congressional approval. Anyone wondering how Sen. Paul would react, as I've been doing, need wait no longer. In a piece published Tuesday afternoon at National Review Online, he reiterated his dissatisfaction with President Obama's domestic agenda, and then proceeded to write:

... I must oppose the most recent statements made by Mitt Romney in which he says he, as president, could take us to war unilaterally with Iran, without any approval from Congress.

This is a misreading of the role of the president and Congress in declaring war. The Constitution clearly states that it is Congress that has the power to declare war, not the president. The War Powers Act also clearly states that U.S. forces are to engage in hostilities only if the circumstances are "pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

Absent these criteria, the president has no authority to declare war. Even if the president believes he has such authority, the War Powers Act goes on to require the president to seek congressional approval within 60 days of conflict. No president is above the law or above the Constitution.
Paul criticized the Obama Administration's foreign policy too:
President Obama was elected on a platform of ending wars, yet he has opposed every effort made by me and others in the Senate to do that. He opposed my resolution to end the Iraq War. He has refused my urgings to end the war in Afghanistan more quickly. He started another war in Libya, and this time went further into unconstitutional territory than previous presidents by not even seeking Congressional approval whatsoever. I opposed him when he did that. Anyone who believes President Obama is less aggressive internationally than his predecessors is mistaken. I do not yet know if I will find a Romney presidency more acceptable on foreign policy.
As interesting as the piece itself is its venue, National Review Online's group blog, The Corner, which isn't generally friendly to non-interventionists. The comments beneath the post were as heated as you'd expect.

Ron Paul insurgents seize control of state Republican parties