ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

The Cowboy Byte

Today's Featured Article:

It’s (Almost) Official: Mitt Romney Clinches GOP Nomination With Win in Texas

Today's Cowboy Headlines:
Headlines you might have missed:  

Personal Liberty Alerts

Latest From Ben Crystal May 30, 2012
Searching For Cincinnatus Searching For Cincinnatus »
Now that Congressman Ron Paul has announced that he will no longer be pursuing victories in the remaining Republican primaries, I am left to ponder the increasing likelihood that I'm going to have to get used to saying "President Romney." More »


Freedom Watch

A New Bill To Audit The Federal Reserve A New Bill To Audit The Federal Reserve »
A crucial vote is coming in July in which we learn once and for all whether Congress works for the banksters and Wall Street or if there is hope of reclaiming a government that works for the people. That vote is on HR 459, a bill that provides for a thorough audit of the Federal Reserve. More »

Personal Liberty News

U.N. Countries Expelling Syrian Ambassadors U.N. Countries Expelling Syrian Ambassadors »
The United States, Australia, Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Canada have joined together, expelling Syrian diplomats in the wake of a massacre in the Syrian village of Houla. Many victims, including infants and children, were shot at close range.  More »



DHS Is Watching DHS Is Watching »
Thanks to a Freedom of Information Act request, bloggers and social media users now know the hundreds of words that they should avoid using online to keep from being scrutinized by the Department of Homeland Security.  More »

MSNBC Host Says Soldiers Are Not Heroes MSNBC Host Says Soldiers Are Not Heroes »
Chris Hayes, host of MSNBC's "Up," apologized after making disparaging remarks about fallen soldiers. As families prepared to remember their loved ones on Memorial Day, Hayes expressed contempt for the word "hero."  More »

Democratic Congressman Jokes About Trayvon Martin Shooting Democratic Congressman Jokes About Trayvon Martin Shooting »
Congressman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) shocked students at the University of Massachusetts when he referred to the Trayon Martin shooting during his commencement speech. Frank noted that the joke wasn't a new one. In fact, it was the fourth time he used it this year.  More »


You Sound Off!

Shakespeare And History

A few months ago, a public library rejected my free talk about William Shakespeare. The talk was based on my newly published book, Shakespeare Suppressed: The Uncensored Truth About Shakespeare and His Works (2011). It is a history book, filled with contemporary facts about Shakespeare with more than 600 footnotes.

Was my talk rejected because people are no longer interested in a man who wrote plays more than 400 years ago? No, that can't be the case because people continue to attend Shakespeare festivals all over the United States. And new Shakespeare biographies are published every year and people are buying them. And Stratford-upon-Avon, the supposed birthplace of Shakespeare, is still the second or third most popular town visited by tourists in England. No, Shakespeare is as popular as he ever was. More »


Social Security disability trust fund projected to run out of cash by 2016

 

 

By Brian Faler

A government entitlement program is headed for insolvency in four years, and it’s not the one members of Congress are talking about most.
The Social Security disability program’s trust fund is projected to run out of cash far sooner than the better-known Social Security retirement plan or Medicare. That will trigger a 21 percent cut in benefits to 11 million Americans — people with disabilities, plus their spouses and children — many of whom rely on the program to stay out of poverty.
“It’s really striking how rapidly this is growing, how big it’s become and how D.C. is just afraid of it,” said Mark Duggan, a University of Pennsylvania economist and adviser to the Social Security Administration.
Part of the reason for the burgeoning costs is that the 77 million baby boomers projected to swamp federal retirement plans will reach the disability program first. That’s because almost all boomers are at least 50 years old, the age at which someone is most likely to become disabled.
The growing costs are also a result of the economy’s troubles. When people can’t find work and run through their jobless benefits, many turn to disability benefits for assistance.
“They’re desperate,” said Ken Nibali, a retired associate commissioner of the program. “Some who are marginal and struggling to have a low-paying job now literally have no options.” So, he said, “they figure, ‘I do have trouble working, and I’m going to apply and see if I’m eligible.’ ”
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), said he has tried to interest fellow lawmakers in the issue, without much luck. “Nobody wants to touch things where they can be criticized,” Coburn said, adding, “the fund is going bankrupt” and “then what are we going to do?”
Applications to the disability program have risen more than 30 percent since 2007 — the last recession started in December that year — and the number of Americans receiving disability benefits is up 23 percent.
More Americans receive disability benefits than 20 years ago, although people are less likely to have physically demanding jobs, health care has improved and the Americans With Disabilities Act bans discrimination against those with handicaps.
Social Security is made up of two programs: the retirement plan supporting 40 million senior citizens and 6 million survivors, and the disability insurance program created during the Eisenhower administration.
The disability program pays benefits averaging $1,111 a month, with the money coming from the Social Security payroll tax. The program cost $132 billion last year, more than the combined annual budgets of the departments of Agriculture, Homeland Security, Commerce, Labor, Interior and Justice. That doesn’t include an additional $80 billion spent because disability beneficiaries become eligible for Medicare, regardless of their age, after a two-year waiting period.
The disability program is projected to exhaust its trust fund in 2016, according to a Social Security trustees report released last month. Once it runs through its reserve, incoming payroll-tax revenue will cover only 79 percent of benefits, according to the trustees. Because the plan is barred from running a deficit, aid would have to be cut to match revenue.
Duggan said the disability plan has been running on autopilot for decades and lawmakers could find savings to help avoid the scheduled cuts. While federally financed, the program is administered by the states, and disability rates among them vary widely. West Virginia topped the list in 2010, with 9 percent of residents between ages 18 and 64 receiving aid. Utah and Alaska had the lowest rates at 2.8 percent.
People whose benefit applications are rejected can appeal to administrative-law judges, and statistics show some judges are far more likely to approve benefits than others. One reason is that the program, which once focused largely on people who suffered from strokes, cancer and heart attacks, increasingly supports those with depression, back pain, chronic fatigue syndrome and other comparatively subjective conditions.
“They’re very, very hard to evaluate,” said Nicole Maestas, director of the Rand Center for Disability Research. “Reasonable people differ about what constitutes a disability.”
Statistics show that once people enter the program they are unlikely to leave, with fewer than 1 percent rejoining the workforce. Many worked “menial” jobs that didn’t offer health insurance, and the program gives them an opportunity to join Medicare long before they might otherwise qualify, Nibali said.
The agency faces a backlog of 1.4 million reviews it’s supposed to periodically conduct to ensure beneficiaries are entitled to stay on the rolls. The agency has said it doesn’t have the money to do the reviews.
Neither President Obama nor House Republicans in their proposed budgets has addressed the disability program’s shortfall.
“We’re not trying to fix every problem in America with this one document,” said House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) of his budget plan. “We’re trying to prevent a debt crisis, and this is not a driver of our debt.”
“The administration believes that disability insurance is a vital lifeline for millions of Americans,” Kenneth Baer, a spokesman for the White House budget office, said in an e-mail. “The president remains willing to work with Congress on a bipartisan basis to strengthen Social Security and protect the millions of beneficiaries.”
He added that lawmakers didn’t fully fund the administration’s request for more money to screen beneficiaries.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), whose committee sets Social Security policy, said the program’s finances are less dire than they may appear. Congress can funnel revenue from elsewhere in the government to cover the program’s shortfall, he said.
— Bloomberg News
© The Washington Post Company

Obama set to arm Italy's drones in milestone move



U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks during an observance of the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War, at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial wall in Washington, May 28, 2012. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
WASHINGTON
(Reuters) - President Barack Obama's administration appears set to notify the U.S. Congress of plans to arm a fleet of Italian MQ-9 Reaper drones, a step that may spur a wider spread of remotely piloted hunter-killer aircraft.
The administration could move ahead within two weeks on the proposal to let Italy join Britain in deploying U.S. drones with weapons such as laser-guided bombs and Hellfire missiles, American officials said.
Italy has a fleet of six Reapers. The sale of the technology to arm them, including bomb racks and "weaponization" kits costing up to $17 million, would help the United States redistribute the burden of its global military operations as the Pentagon's budget is being squeezed by deficit-reduction requirements.
Aides to Obama have been informally consulting the House of Representatives' and Senate's foreign affairs committees about the proposed sale to Italy since last year, congressional staff said.
The latest such period of "pre-consultations" ended May 27 without a move to block the sale, according to the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the coming formal notification to lawmakers.
A transfer to Italy would make it harder for the United States to deny armed-drone technology if asked for it by other members of the 28-country NATO alliance or by close U.S. partners such as South Korea, Japan and Australia, arms-sale analysts said.
"I think that if you sell armed drones to Italy, you will very likely make a decision that any member of NATO that wants them can also get them," said a former congressional staff member who followed the issue.
Some lawmakers fear that a decision to arm Italian drones may spur overseas sales of related technology by Israel, Russia and China.
The United States has used its MQ-9s to hunt and kill members of al Qaeda and its allies in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistani tribal areas.
Britain, the first foreign country to get U.S. technology to arm its Reapers, is considered a special case. Many U.S. officials and members of Congress view it as Washington's staunchest and most reliable ally.
The State Department does not comment on proposed sales of U.S. military hardware until formal notifications have been completed. But a State Department official described Italy as a strong NATO ally which contributes significantly to coalition operations.
"The transfer of U.S. defense articles and service to allies like Italy enables us to work together more effectively to meet shared security challenges," said the official, who declined to be named.
SPREAD DRONES, OR LIMIT THEM?
Senator Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has publicly opposed the transfer of armed drones. "There are some military technologies that I believe should not be shared with other countries, regardless of how close our partnership," Feinstein, a California Democrat, said last year.
She said she would put armed drones in the category of weapons the United States should try to rein in, not spread.
Turkey is among countries that have been seeking to buy U.S. unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs. The MQ-9 Reaper is larger and more capable than the earlier MQ-1 Predator, both built by General Atomics.
Turkish President Abdullah Gul said on the sidelines of a NATO summit in Chicago last week that Obama was leaning toward selling UAVs to Turkey, which has fought separatist Kurdish rebels for decades in a conflict that has killed 40,000 people.
"The administration's position (toward a sale) is favorable," Turkey's state-run Anadolu news agency quoted Gul as saying after he met Obama. "They are trying to convince Congress."
A proposed U.S. arms sale to Turkey may proceed unless lawmakers enact joint resolution barring it, an event that has never occurred.
The Obama administration says that all exports of sensitive military technology are considered on a case-by-case basis under a general policy of "restraint," taking into account national security and foreign-policy considerations as well as U.S. multilateral commitments.
Purchasers of U.S.-made military systems must agree to a strict set of "end-use" conditions designed to limit the system to approved uses such as self-defense and United Nations missions. They also must agree to let the United States monitor their adherence to these conditions.
Italy has sought to arm its drones for use in Afghanistan, where it maintains about 3,950 troops. But it initially wanted the drones themselves for such things as border patrols, the former congressional staff member said.
TEAL Group, a U.S. aerospace consultancy, estimated in April that worldwide UAV spending will almost double over the next decade, totaling more than $89 billion in the next 10 years.
(Editing by Christopher Wilson)

HUFFINGTON POST

LEIDSCHENDAM, Netherlands -- International judges sentenced former Liberian President Charles Taylor to 50 years in prison Wednesday, saying he was responsible for "some of the most heinous and brutal crimes recorded in human history" by arming and supporting Sierra Leone rebels in return for "blood diamonds."
Houla Massacre Survivors Speak Out (VIDEO)
Ireland Cracks Down On Prostitution
UN Observers: 13 Bodies Found Bound And Shot In Syria
Legendary Sunken Port Seeks Protection
Big Court Loss For WikiLeaks Chief

Pastor Sentenced To 2 Years In Prison For Teaching That Parents Should Spank Their Children

Michael Snyder
The American Dream


Do you believe that parents should be able to spank their children?  Do you ever express that opinion to others?  If so, then you could be sent to prison.  Sadly, that is exactly what happened to one pastor up in Wisconsin recently.

A minister named Philip Caminiti was sentenced to 2 years in prisonfor simply teaching that parents should spank their children when they misbehave.  Please note that Caminiti was not accused of spanking anyone or of physically hurting anyone.  He was put in prison simply for his speech.  He was put in prison simply for what he was teaching others to do.  Whether you agree with spanking or not, this should be incredibly sobering for all of us.  Increasingly, speech is being penalized in the United States.  Much of the time, the focus of the attacks by the forces of political correctness is on religious speech.  If this trend continues, many of you that are reading this article might be put in jail for the things that you say in the coming years.
When many of us were growing up, once in a while our parents would take out a belt or a wooden paddle and give us a paddling on the behind when we did something wrong.
Was there anything wrong with that?
Of course not.
Yes, there is real child abuse that goes on out there, but in the vast majority of instances spanking does not do any lasting physical harm.  Rather, it benefits the child because it helps them learn what is right and what is wrong.
I know that when I got a licking on the behind as a child that helped me to remember not to do the same thing again.
But Dane County Circuit Judge Maryann Sumi was absolutely horrified that some parents would actually use a wooden spoon to spank their little children when they misbehaved.
Perhaps that judge should actually try to spank someone with a wooden spoon some time.  You simply cannot do much damage with a wooden spoon.
Instead of going after the parents who were doing the spanking, prosecutors chose to go after the pastor instead.  They claimed that Caminiti was “the spoke in the wheel of this conspiracy“.
Even after Caminiti leaves prison, he will be forbidden from having any contact with his old church….
Caminiti will be on extended supervision for six years after his release from prison. Despite objections on constitutional grounds by Caminiti’s lawyers, Sumi ordered that he not have any contact with the Aleitheia Bible Church and have no leadership role in any church.
What in the world is happening to this country?
Criminal predators are literally eating the faces off of people, and yet authorities want to go after pastors that are encouraging their congregations to follow the teachings of the Bible?
Have we stepped into a really bizarre episode of The Twilight Zone?
Sadly, this is not the only example of how our free speech is under attack these days.
Up in New York, a new bill was recently introduced that would outlaw all “mean-spirited and baseless political attacks”.
I think that would cover a whole lot of people that leave comments on my blog.
The following is how a recent article by Kurt Nimmo described what this new law would require….
New York state government is attempting to pass the measure in both the Senate and the Assembly. The legislation has been referred to the Codes Committee in the Senate, and the Government Operations Committee in the Assembly.
Both proposals are identical and would effect messages posted on message boards, blogs, social networks, and “any other discussion site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted messages.” The law would require websites to post email addresses for “removal requests, clearly visible in any sections where comments are posted.” Those demanding the removal of content they find objectionable, however, would have their anonymity protected.
“Had the internet been around in the late 1700s, perhaps the anonymously written Federalist Papers would have to be taken down unless Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay revealed themselves,” notesDavid Kravets, writing for Wired.
Will we soon see laws such as this nationwide?
Will all blogs and websites soon be at the mercy of the politically correct police?
Up in Buffalo, New York it is apparently now against the law to hand out Christian tracts on a public sidewalk.  At least that is what one man was told recently when he attempted to hand out tracts outside of an Italian heritage festival.  The following is from a recent WorldNetDaily article….
While handing out tracts to willing recipients on a public street during a public festival, Owen was approached by a police officer who declined to identify himself but told him that the Buffalo Police Department is “the law” and he should stop handing out tracts.
According to the lawsuit: “Subsequently, another police officer, Officer Slomka, arrived on the scene. She quickly informed Owen that they could not hand out tracts in the festival and explained that the prohibition was ‘by our orders.’ Owen asked for her name, and she replied: ‘Slomka, write it down.’ Owen advised that he believed the tracts to be free speech; nonplussed, Officer Slomka reiterated that they couldn’t hand out tracts there and had to go outside of the festival area to continue with their expressive activity.”
Then, “Owen inquired as to whether they would be arrested if they continued to hand out tracts in the festival area, to which, Officer Slomka replied: ‘Yes.’”
That almost makes me angry enough to take a trip over to Buffalo and hand out tracts right outside the police station.
Even if you do not ever distribute literature, you should be alarmed at how our freedom of speech is being eroded.
The truth is that whenever anyone has their freedom of speech attacked it is an attack on all of us.
If we are not careful, we are going to end up just like Canada.
At one high school up in Canada recently, a student was suspended from school for a week for wearing a shirt with the following message….
“Life is wasted without Jesus”
The student was told that the shirt was “hate talk” and that he would be suspended for the rest of the year if he tried to wear it to school again.
They are coming for our free speech ladies and gentlemen.
They are not going to be satisfied until they have either shut all of us up or put all of us in prison.
It is imperative that we all stand up for free speech while we still can.  Once our freedom of speech is gone, the loss of the rest of our freedoms will only be a matter of time.


  1. Chicago Man Shot 28 Times By Cops Sentenced To 40 Years In Prison
  2. Homeschooling Banned in California as State Turns Parents Into Criminals for Teaching Their Own Children
  3. DeLay, sentenced to 3 years of prison, shows no remorse
  4. Disgraced 9/11 ‘hero’: Former Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik sentenced to 4 years in prison
  5. Ex-cop Sentenced to 75 Years to Life in Prison for Teacher Sex Assault
  6. “Kids for cash” judge sentenced to 28 years in prison
  7. Teaching Kids to Mistrust Government Makes Couple ‘Unsuitable’ Parents
  8. Parents: Public Schools Own Your Children
  9. Parents to be fined if they take their children out of sex lessons
  10. ‘Deadbeat’ parents caught in a debtor’s prison
  11. The United Nations: Our Children’s New Parents?
  12. Government to teach parents how to raise children

The Conservative Byte

Today's Featured Article: Obama Attacks Romney With Trump ‘Birther’ Video

Today's Politically Incorrect Laugh:
Over The Falls We Go

Today's Politically Incorrect Headlines:

American Vision News

BREAKING: Mitt Romney is Not The GOP Nominee

Reality Check: Did Mitt Romney Really Secure GOP Nomination With Texas ...

DEAR GOP: WE WILL NOT VOTE FOR MITT ROMNEY!

WE WILL NOT VOTE FOR MITT ROMNEY!


If We have to... We will write in RON PAUL!


Many say: A vote for Ron Paul, is a vote for Barack Obama. But as things stand... Obama and his Administration stands a very good chance of being impeached in office. This would give us a whole new President, which would be a whole lot better than Romney! We CAN NOT take a chance of a possible 8 whole years of Romney, which would only continue on down the same road Obama made us travel down.


Even if Obama isn't impeached... It is only 4 years, and not 8!

Obama impeachment bill gaining steam


Hoping to soon pass committee and make it to the house is HCR 107, a bill threatening the possibility of the impeachment of the President of the United States for high crimes and misdemeanors, now thrust into the spotlight.
Citing a demand Wednesday that Obama regain respect for the War Powers Act, constitutional laws that restrict a President from waging a war without first receiving the approval of the people and its Congress, was the architect of the legislation, 9-term North Carolina Congressman, Walter Jones.
Thanking the most popular internet radio show and its host, Alex Jones, was Congressman Jones, grateful for the opportunity to speak to the perfect audience for gaining support and momentum for this type of bill. One that already has multiple co-sponsors.
After all, it was Ron Paul and his supporters who started the modern Tea Party on the very same radio show in 2007, with dedicated listeners and supporters that helped the movement eventually gain national prominence in the 2010 mid-terms, with many 'unsuspecting' upsets and likely more on the way.
Stating the need to reign the Peace Prize White House in from continuing the constant, deafening pounding on the drums of war, the Congressman used Libya as a prime example, alleging the constitution explicitly states something the government has mysteriously allowed a free pass on for far too long...Article II, Section 4 of the US Constitution. Alex Jones added Article I, Section 8, Clause 11.
In order to garner approval for the actions taken against Gaddafi in Libya, for instance, Obama went even one step further by openly waging a war, with US troops and equipment, with only an OK by the UN, again declaring Congress totally irrelevant.
Even Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta recently reiterated the startling sentiments in an Armed Services Committee meeting, ones he shared a couple months earlier, while echoing the administration's open disrespect for the law and arguing for the UN's authority, over the US, to use the US military overseas, for its own agenda. Open and clear violations that could present a clear and present danger to US national security.
Especially after such egregious acts of war taken by the last few successive administrations, with 2 or 3 panels of experts on the constitution available for testimony, Congressman Jones is looking to fashion a hearing by July, before the committee moves it to the floor.
He's confident, with the situation at hand, he may finally get enough members of congress to move this type of resolution forward in the house.
Ron Paul and Congressman Jones was with mostly Republicans in 1999 filing suit on Clinton's decision to bomb Kosovo, but the courts used the easy to say, yet seemingly impossible to accomplish, excuse that “congress has the power to cut the war budgets.”
Last year it was he and only five other Congressman, two other Republicans including Ron Paul and three Democrats, including Dennis Kucinich, confidently taking it to the courts again over Obama's decision to bomb Libya, with the courts repeating the excuse that Congress already has the ability to cut the funding if they really wanted.
The courts know Congress is very unlikely to cut the war budget, however, because of the political pressure of not wanting to leave the military high and dry during actions overseas, a vicious cycle that perpetuates the problem.
But the broadcast reminded listeners that, technically, the President isn't even legally “Commander and Chief” until an official Declaration of War is given by Congress as an OK for the President to begin war-time operations against an aggressor. Stunningly, this is something that hasn't actually happened since prior to the Korean War.
Since the TV boom, however, the government has magically been able to get away with waging wars without approval, on just about whomever they've wanted to, and Congress has done virtually nothing to remain relevant against a consistently over-reaching Executive Branch.
All this could very well be a large part of the reason polls have long-stated Congressional approval ratings to be under an astounding 10% for years, with still nothing ever reasonably done to regain the people's confidence.
Obama is also the first sitting President to ever join a foreign governing body while still sitting President. He accepted the duty of acting Chair of the UN Security Council, even striking the gavel in open session, a clear violation of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Something you'd think a President who happens to also be a former “constitutional law professor” would know is highly illegal and sure to eventually, hopefully attract the attention of the people and its Congress.
Officially introduced to the congressional legislature on March 7tth, the actual title of Congressman Jones' bill reads, “Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution,”
Congressman Jones has also been seen recently spelling out a great case for a Trading with the Enemy Act argument, against Obama, for publicly funding Al Qaeda in Libya with money, weapons and training.
Obama has allegedly used a widely-known, enemy terrorist group, supposedly the prime suspects in the WTC attacks on 9/11, to further an overseas political agenda, apparently also largely run by the UN, at the expense of the US military/taxpayer.
Senator, Prescott Bush, Grandfather to George W. Bush, was also tied to a seizure of the Union Bank and its assets in 1942, suspected of holding gold of behalf of NAZI leaders during WW II.
It seems as though the more things change, the more they actually stay the same. Until now, if the necessary support for HCR 107 has anything to do with it.
Congressmen Jones, Kucinich, Paul and many others ask that citizens and all supporters of the bill call the US Capital switch-board, at 202-224-3121, and ask to speak to your Representative.
They will put you through to your Representative's office and there you can ask them to co-sponsor and/or support the bill, H.C.R. 107, to help insure the President follows the law and uses the proper channels before waging a war on yet another country.
If you're unsure who your representatives are, use this official tool to easily locate them by zip code.
Visit these related pages: Facebook | @Conspiracy_X | @celebs4truth | celebs4truth.com | Youtube
Supporting Medium:
Library of Congress: Obama impeachment bill, HCR 107
Bill architect: Congressman, Walter Jones
(Youtube): Alex Jones Show with Congressman Jones
(Youtube): The Tea Party Started in 2007 and Ron Paul is the Godfather
Washington Post: Obama explains Libya mission to Congress
(Youtube): Panetta at Senate Armed Services Committee Session on March 7, 2012
(YouTube): Sen. Levin Chairs Armed Services Committee Hearing with Def. Secy. Panetta on Feb. 14, 2012
Congressman Ron Paul: Paul, bipartisan team, sue Clinton over Kosovo
Huffington Post: Congress Approval Rating Lower Than Porn, Polygamy, BP Oil Spill, 'U.S. Going Communist' (VIDEO)
RightSoup: While We Were Looking The Other Way–Obama To Be First President To Chair UN Security Council
Atlas Shrugs: Transnationalist Obama: First US President to Chair UN Security Council
AR: An Open Letter to Professor Obama
CWJ: Obama Admin: Taliban Isn’t The Enemy, So Let’s Fund Al-Qaeda!


Third Party Run Petition

Please sign petition to encourage Ron Paul to run on a third party ticket! (Why? See Third Party FAQ)
Dear Ron Paul,

Please run on a third party ticket until November 6th, 2012 to be the next President of the United States of America and to ensure you'll have the biggest stage to spread the message of liberty around the world.

Thank you.

Holder to brief black pastors on campaign 2012

Attorney General Eric Holder, the IRS, and the liberal lawyers at the ACLU will brief several hundred pastors in the African American community on how to participate in the presidential election -- which the Congressional Black Caucus chair expects will help President Obama's campaign.
"We will have representatives from nine denominations who actually pastor somewhere in the neighborhood of about 10 million people, and we're going to first of all equip them with the information they need to know about what they can say and what they cannot say in the church that would violate their 501c3 status with the IRS," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., told MSNBC today.
"In fact, we're going to have the IRS administrator there, we're going to have the Attorney General Eric Holder there, we're going to have the lawyers' organization from around the country, the ACLU -- all giving ministers guidance about what they can and cannot do," he noted.
Cleaver said they would not tell pastors which candidate to support. They will let them know who to regard as the bad guys, though (hint: not Democrats). "We're going to talk about some of the draconian laws that have cropped up around the country as a result of the 17 percent increase in African American votes," Cleaver said, describing voter ID laws as a form of Jim Crow-style "poll tax" on seniors and black voters.
The CBC chairman is confident that "President Obama is going to get 95 percent of the [African American] vote," and wants to keep that turnout high. "We want to let them know that there is a theological responsibility to participate in the political process, at least in the Judeo-Christian tradition," he said.

Real marriage outlawed

Public
Advocate Banner


The past year has seen an unprecedented surge in state legalized homosexual "marriage."

And every one of them came about through legislative decree -- against the will of the voters.

New York was the first state to fall in this current offensive, despite an intense lobby campaign led by Public Advocate.

However the fight is not over.

The state's 9th Congressional district -- a seat held by the Democrats for more than 80 years -- was taken over in a special election by Republican Bob Turner.

Mr. Turner ran on a platform of family values and a pledge to repeal homosexual "marriage."

And just recently, Republican James Alesi -- one of the three Republicans who were paid to vote against marriage -- announced he would not be seeking re-election this fall due to the pro-Family backlash.

Currently the fate of marriage in New York is being decided in the courts -- an issue of the legality of its passage -- but other states have afforded pro-Family activists greater opportunities to fight back.

Legislatures in Maryland and Washington State both forced homosexual "marriage" through earlier this year.

Thankfully these decisions can be overturned through public referendums -- if they get enough signers.

Public Advocate is leading efforts in each state to place marriage referendums on the November ballots.

I have personally been on the ground in Maryland for months coordinating the largest county in the state.

Public Advocate has contacted 1,000 local churches and has turned in over 5,000 signatures -- 1,000 collected by me in person.

And we have mail thousands more blank petitions out prospective signers -- spending more than $5,000 in the state so far.

Of course, none of that would be possible with the generous support of hundreds of thousands of pro-Family supporters.

We are facing a much tougher fight in Washington State.

The best chance the family has of winning there is Initiative I-1192 -- but the minimum number of signers is so much higher: 300,000.

And the enemy there as taken the fight to a new level of viciousness.

Homosexual activists are publishing the names of anyone who signs the Initiative and encouraging their membership to track them down and harass them.

I have budgeted three times the amount of money to run our program there... more than $15,000

I have already contact 1,000 churches there and I'm planning thousands of pieces of mail.

But let me assure you this is a fight Public Advocate can win.

The final fight facing real marriage is California's Proposition 8.

Despite its overwhelming approval by California voters, activist judges have ruled it unconstitutional.

They have ruled real marriage legislation to be unconstitutional -- and if the U.S. Supreme Court agrees with them it will overturn laws in everyone of the more than thirty states to define real marriage as one man and one woman.

Public Advocate is preparing for the upcoming Supreme Court with a pro-Family Amicus Brief -- and so far more than 20,000 Public Advocate supporters have signed cover letters to be submitted alongside it.

It's shameful the way these legislators and judges have sold out to the Homosexual Lobby.

And if you and I do not turn back this sudden tide, I am terrified of how many more states will see real marriage overtaken by the homosexual agenda.

We have to show them that no matter how many tricks they pull, mainstream Americans will never give up.

For the Family,


Eugene Delgaudio
President, Public Advocate of the United States


P.S. Please prayerfully consider chipping in with a donation of $10 or more to help Public Advocate fight for traditional values.