ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Personal Liberty Alerts

Latest From Bob Livingston April 30, 2012
Does The Republican Establishment Want To Lose?
Does The Republican Establishment Want To Lose? »
The Republican Party establishment has employed all types of shenanigans and underhanded tactics to ensure its candidate to oppose President Barack Obama is Mitt Romney and not a true conservative. Most of the Republican voters find Romney less than slightly palatable.  More »


On Your Own

The 5 Things You'd Better Have in Your Bug Out Bag, But Probably Don't The 5 Things You'd Better Have in Your Bug Out Bag, But Probably Don't »
When you are preparing for the worst, it becomes very easy to overlook simple items that you'll need to survive. Sure, you'll have your basic first aid kits and rations of food, but there are a few items that you should always remember to have with you.  More »

Personal Liberty News

Michelle Obama's Trip To Spain Cost Taxpayers $467,585 First Lady's Trip To Spain Cost Taxpayers $467,585 »
Following the first lady's lavish getaway to Spain in 2010, the White House assured American citizens that the Obamas would pay for any personal expenses. But Judicial Watch has announced that government documents suggest it was on taxpayers' dime. More »


Tampa Seeks Gun Ban During RNC Tampa Seeks Gun Ban During RNC »
Many Republicans are ardent supporters of 2nd Amendment rights, but those who are planning to attend the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., may have to leave their guns at home despite State laws favorable to concealed carry. More »

Small Farms Under Attack Small Farms Under Attack »
Government efforts to do away with the small family farm in the United States to make the populace dependent on large corporate-and-bureaucratic-controlled farming operations for food are becoming increasingly successful. More »

Michelle Obama Shares Her Secret Service Fantasy Michelle Obama Shares Her Secret Service Fantasy »
Michelle Obama took questions from children at the 20-year anniversary of the White House's "Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work" day. The first lady has no plans of occupying the Oval Office. When asked, "Will you ever run for president?" Obama responded: "Absolutely not." More »


Questions For Bob

What About Mitt Romney?

Dear Mr. Livingston:

At a crucial point in the presidential campaign, I find it appalling that you will distribute a newsletter urging the financial support of a Congressional candidate from Arizona, which follows a newsletter some months ago, encouraging support for Rick Santorum in his presidential campaign. Other organizations have sent out similar newsletters urging support for Newt Gingrich.

However, not once has Personal Liberty Alerts or any other religious and/or non-profit organization sent out a newsletter on behalf of Mitt Romney who has been the frontrunner of Republican Party for many months; and after winning five large primary elections last night it is obvious that he will be the nominee.

 Bob's Response »

WND News Alerts

WorldNetDaily.com


Is violence about to erupt in your town Tuesday?
May Day isn't just for Commies anymore, and at least one American mayor fears the worst, warning that protesters may use Occupy May Day events tomorrow to "commit violence, damage property and disrupt peaceful free-speech activity."
Read the latest now on WND.com.
Plus!
It just gets more mysterious. Medical examiners in Los Angeles are now investigating the possible poisoning death of one of their own officials who may have worked on the case of Andrew Breitbart, the conservative activist who died March 1, the same day Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced probable cause for forgery in President Obama's birth certificate.
Click here for details.
Must Read News
Other Highlights
    Christians aim to stop Lady Gaga's 'porn' show
  • Nutella settles lawsuit from angry mom
Make WND your homepage today!
Daily Blessing

Your daily dose of spiritual inspiration
Today's Scripture reading from the Holy Bible
Joke Of The Day
Today's Poll

American Vision News

DR KNOW (statesman) - Ruff Draft

The Key To Getting Ron Paul Elected: Abstain From 1st Ballot Voting!

Will Pastors Risk Tax-Free Status to Help Save America?

No US Church Has Ever Lost Non-Profit Status Over Political Preaching


Kelly OConnell

imageLong before America’s current absolute separation of church and state, colonial pastors regularly preached on politics. According to historians, 18th century sermons decisively encouraged future revolutionaries to resist King George. Moreover, in Western history, important and far-reaching political doctrines were typically deduced first by pastors, Christian professors, and believing philosophers, etc. In fact, without these eminent and brave men, there would be no modern free and prosperous West.
But today, American Believers languish in a ghetto assembled for anyone suggesting religion should influence public policy. Yet, as our currency reveals, previously such influences were assumed. If our forebears were under the same secularist strictures seen today, the early West would have never escaped mediocrity.
This essay argues the Bible contains unique standards regarding mankind which, when correctly applied, benefit and protect everyone. Further, ministers, many loathe to mention politics for fear of government reprisal, must preach these things without dread. The only way these men can truly serve their flocks is by preaching the whole Gospel, not avoiding some because of menacing government masters. Remember Acts, 5:27-29
The apostles were brought before the Sanhedrin (Jewish Council) for questioning by the high priest. “We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name,” he said. “Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and are determined to make us guilty of this man’s blood.” Peter and the other apostles replied: “We must obey God rather than human beings!”

I. Black Robe Regiment

A. Who Were the Black Robe Regiment?

This regiment was simply colonial American clergy using God-given freedoms of speech to describe biblical norms on proper, non-tyrannical government rule. These men were instrumental in the education and preparation of American revolutionaries in decades before the War of Independence. Writes Rev. Wayne C. Sedlak,
During the War of Independence were a group of heroic men referred to as the “Black Regiment”. The very name enraged the British armies. As war heroes, their courage & leadership were lauded from Massachusetts to Georgia. As a “regiment”, they never once drilled together, yet the strategic impact of their highly disciplined attacks was overwhelming. As a unit, they never fought together on a particular field of battle, yet without question, their leadership provided the spark which ignited victory after victory.
This “Black Regiment” was responsible for providing the conviction and wisdom necessary for winning a war against the cruelty of an unjust government. What was the “Black Regiment”? Actually, it wasn’t a regiment at all. It referred to the American Presbyterian, Congregationalist, and Baptist clergy.
British sympathizers (Loyalists), so named them because of the black robes worn by the ministers when they ascended their pulpits each Lord’s Day. The name “stuck”. Colonial enemies knew that the seeds of what the British called “sedition’’ or “revolution” were being sown in the pulpits of America. Without the outspoken, tenacious and courageous leadership exhibited by the pastors of the “Black Regiment”, it is doubtful whether American independence could ever have been achieved.

II. Government Rules Against Politics in the Pulpit

A. IRS & Freedom of Pulpit

There are federal sanctions for American pastors preaching on political issues. The Alliance Defense Fund describes IRS rule against political preaching:
In 1954, U.S. Congress amended (without debate or analysis) Internal Revenue Code ¬ÃŸ501(c)(3), restricting speech of non-profit tax exempt entities, including churches. Before passage, no restrictions existed regarding how churches used speech regarding government and voting, excepting a 1934 law preventing non-profits using a substantial part of their resources to lobby for legislation.
The amendment, from then-Senator Lyndon Johnson, stated non-profit tax exempt entities couldn’t “participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office.” Since the amendment passed, the IRS steadfastly maintains any speech by churches about candidates for government office, including sermons, can result in loss of tax exemption.

B. Pulpit Freedom Sunday: October 7, 2012

The Alliance Defense Fund is calling for a Pulpit Freedom Sunday where pastors talk specifically about political issues, in rejection of IRS rules. Writes the Christian Science Monitor,
On Oct. 7, hundreds of Christian pastors will engage in a mass act of civil disobedience across the USA. From Sunday pulpits, they will purposely violate federal law by openly opposing or endorsing political candidates.
Why break the law on purpose?
These mostly evangelical pastors will attempt to lure the Internal Revenue Service into fining a church or taking away its tax-exempt status. If the IRS takes the bait, this case will be challenged all the way to the Supreme Court to overturn the law.
The group pushing this legal test, Alliance Defense Fund, has gathered increasingly more pastors since 2008. The yearly autumn protest—Pulpit Freedom Sunday, occurs just before elections. Many participating pastors are eager to turn the US into “a Christian nation” by playing a direct role in politics.
Ironically, ADF reports no church has ever lost its tax exempt status over the rule, and yet hundreds of thousands of pastors are cowed into silence every week by such fears.

III. Preaching on Proper Government: Original Black Robe Regiment

A. Great Historic Moments in Christian Statecraft

Breakthroughs in political achieved by Christian thinkers are too numerous to list, but consider the following five achievements:
1. Alfred the Great set the Ten Commandments as the center of English law, using biblical legal analysis for his laws, laying the foundation for subsequent development of Common Law.
2. Christian scholar William of Ockham’s analysis of mankind’s place after expulsion from Paradise, helped develop the ideas of Natural Law, Consent of the Governed, & Natural Rights.
3. Magna Carta, the greatest legal document in British and American history, was articulated and composed by Stephen Langton, Archbishop of Canterbury.
4. Lex Rex, famed call for a Rule of Law above king, composed by famed Scots Presbyterian pastor Samuel Rutherford divinity professor at University of St. Andrews.
5. Constitutionalism is applied Rule of Law, championed by Puritan-trained John Locke, advocating separation of powers and limitations of government to minimize threats of tyranny.

B. Quotes From US Colonial Black Robe Regiment Pulpits

1. Call for Moral Government: Civil Magistrates Must be Just, Ruling in the Fear of God
Charles Chauncy (Harvard) 1747 Boston
Text: The God of Israel said, the Rock of Israel spake to me; he that ruleth over Men must be just, ruling in the Fear of God. (II Sam. 23:3)
Judged by the manner in which these words are introduced, there are none in all the bible, applicable to civil rulers, in their public capacity, of more solemn importance:
I. There is a certain order among mankind, according to which some are entrusted with power to rule over others.
II. Those who rule over others must be just, ruling in the fear of God.
2. Natural Rights: Essential Rights & Liberties of Protestants
Elisha Williams (Yale) 1744 Boston
These Rights & Liberties include:
a. Property: Every man having a property in his own person, the labour of his body and the work of his hands are properly his own, to which no one has right but himself.
b. Civil Law: Obedience due government is limited. Salus populi est lex suprema, ie the end of all humane authority is the good of the public.
c. Positive Law: Every law not contrary to a superior law is to be obeyed.
d. End of Law is Protection of Life, Liberty & Property: Whenever government power is applied to any other end than preservation persons and properties, (according to the great Mr. Lock) it becomes tyranny.
e. General Call to Christian Freedom. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty. Gal. 4. 31.
f. Natural Law: Natural freedom is not liberty to do whatever one pleases, ignoring written law; but consists in freedom from any superiour power on earth, and having only the law of nature (ie of God) for his rule.
3. Right to Truly Representational Congress: The Snare Broken
Jonathan Mayhew (Harvard) 1766 Boston
Affirmation of British Rights in Colonial America:
As free-born men, never enslaved by right of conquest in war, nor sold as slaves, so we have natural rights, till we have freely consented to part with them, either in person, or by those whom we have appointed to represent, and to act for us. This natural right is declared, affirmed and secured to us, as British subjects, by Magna Charta; all acts contrary to which, are said to be ipso facto null and void.
Having been initiated, in youth, in the doctrines of civil liberty, taught by Plato, Demosthenes, Cicero and other renowned ancients; and such as Sidney, Milton & Locke, among moderns; I liked them; they seemed rational. Having earlier learnt from holy scripture, that wise, brave and vertuous men were always friends to liberty; that the Son of God came down from heaven, to make us “free indeed”; and “where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty”; this made me conclude freedom was a great blessing. Yet, she seems about to take her final departure from America, leaving that ugly hag slavery, deformed child of Satan, in her room.
4. Righteousness of Resisting Tyranny: Divine Judgments Upon Tyrants
Jacob Cushing (Harvard) 1778 Boston
Text: Rejoice, O ye nations, with his people, for he wilt avenge the blood of his servants, and will render vengeance to his adversaries; and will be merciful unto his land, and to his people. (Deuteronomy, 32:43)
On Christian Warfare: Cultivate, my friends, a martial spirit, strive to excel in the art of war, to qualify to act the part of soldiers well; and, under providence, be helpful in vanquishing and subduing the enemies of God; and be numbered among those who shall be worthy to wear the laurels of victory and triumph. True Christians, good soldiers of Jesus Christ, fight manfully under his banner, as high priests of your profession, and great captain of your salvation.
5. Saluting the Constitution: Sermon on Day of Commencement of the Constitution
Samuel Cooper (Harvard) 1780 Boston
Text: Their Congregation shall be established before me: and their Nobles shall be of themselves, and their Governor shall proceed from the midst of them. (Jeremiah, 30: 20-21)
The form of government originally established in the Hebrew nation by a charter from heaven, was a free republic, with God himself presiding. It consisted of three parts; a chief magistrate who was called judge or leader, such as Joshua, a council of seventy chosen men, and the general assemblies of the people. Of these the two last were the most essential and permanent, and the first more occasional, according to the particular circumstances of the nation. The assemblies of the people were frequently held by divine appointment, considered the fountain of civil power. Even the law of Moses, though framed by God himself, was not imposed upon Hebrews against their will; it was laid open before the whole congregation of Israel; they freely adopted it. It became their law, not only by divine appointment, but by voluntary and express consent. Upon this account it is called in the sacred writings a covenant, compact, or mutual stipulation. A solemn renewal of this covenant was the very last public act of Joshua their renowned leader.

Conclusion

In USA, 75% claim Christianity. About 40% of 300 million Americans attend church weekly. So approximately 120 million are regularly listening to 300,000 pulpits. If even 25% of pastors explained Biblical standards, 30 million Americans would have weekly teaching on making USA more Christlike, including voting for more godly leaders. If half, or 15 million, decided to vote per biblical norms, it could spark a massive return to America’s lost biblical society, as when the Founding Fathers decided to throw a Revolution.

Exemption Requirements - Section 501(c)(3) Organizations

 
To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.
Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are commonly referred to as charitable organizations. Organizations described in section 501(c)(3), other than testing for public safety organizations, are eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions in accordance with Code section 170.
The organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, and no part of a section 501(c)(3) organization's net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. If the organization engages in an excess benefit transaction with a person having substantial influence over the organization, an excise tax may be imposed on the person and any organization managers agreeing to the transaction.
Section 501(c)(3) organizations are restricted in how much political and legislative (lobbying) activities they may conduct. For a detailed discussion, see Political and Lobbying Activities. For more information about lobbying activities by charities, see the article Lobbying Issues; for more information about political activities of charities, see the FY-2002 CPE topic Election Year Issues.

http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=96099,00.html

USCTitle 26Subtitle AChapter 1Subchapter FPart I › § 501(c)(3)

(c) List of exempt organizations  

(3) Corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports competition (but only if no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic facilities or equipment), or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation (except as otherwise provided in subsection (h)), and which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.  

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/501 

Louisiana GOP calls for all officials to resign after Ron Paul win yesterday!

The Greater New Orleans Republicans call for the resignation of the leadership of the Republican Party of Louisiana in response to the debacle of today’s caucus.
 
“We congratulate Ron Paul supporters for apparently capturing their first state delegation in this Presidential election cycle through an excellent get out the vote effort today,” stated GNOR Chairman Sarah Roy.  “However, the result of this ill-conceived and confusing caucus clearly does not represent the will of the vast majority of Louisiana Republican voters as Ron Paul recently received only six percent of the vote in the Louisiana Presidential Primary.”
 
This odd and undemocratic result unfortunately will embarrass and distract Governor Jindal, as he labors to pass his Legislative agenda, and presumed Presidential nominee Mitt Romney, as he clinches the nomination and turns his attention to defeating President Barack Obama.
 
Several members of GNOR ran in the caucus, and GNOR, along with the Romney Campaign, attempted to motivate Republican voters to turn out.  However, sparse and obscure voting locations, morning voting hours, scheduling during the Zurich Classic, Jazz Fest and Legislative Session, combined with setting the caucus so late in the Primary season that all major challengers to Mitt Romney had dropped out, made it all but impossible to offer voters a rationale to caucus.
 
Further, after Rick Santorum, who garnered the most votes in the Louisiana Primary, left the race, members of GNOR proposed a unity ticket, comprised of supporters of Santorum, Gingrich and Romney, allowing those who would support the eventual nominee to run as one.  However, state party leaders, unwilling to share delegates with the Romney campaign, vetoed the approach.
 
Today’s debacle clearly lies at the feet of State Party leaders, who with combined arrogance and incompetence, ignored warnings that the Byzantine system they had conjured could be manipulated, ignored calls for unity and common sense, and instead caused the State of Louisiana, Governor Jindal and likely Republican nominee Mitt Romney embarrassment.  They should own up to their misdeeds and resign.
 

Ron Paul's Texas Straight Talk 4/30/12: The Alarming Suicide Epidemic in the Military

Ron Paul Warns People of possible False Flag Attack: 'Ship' or 'City'

Bush's Grandfather Led Nazi Coup Against White House in 1933

Mitt Romney - Convert or Chameleon

National Pro-Life Alliance

A recently released book on Mitt Romney clearly supports the importance of your National Pro-Life Alliance's Election Year Pro-Life Candidate Survey Program. And how especially important it will be to elect real pro-life heroes in the U.S House and Senate.

Unfortunately, the case of Mitt Romney is typical of too many politicians.

It shows that you and I must never stop putting heat on all the politicians to support sweeping pro-life protections, because all too often their positions seem to change when, either as a candidate, or as an office holder, he or she believes that the prevailing wind has shifted.

Now I believe wholeheartedly in St. Paul's "Road to Damascus" conversion, but I am not so sure we can really put much stock into "Road to the Presidency" conversions.

Just how many times should a candidate be allowed to change his position -- and which conversion is real?

Especially on something so black and white as abortion.

Now, true pro-lifers like you and me can understand the conversion from pro-abortion to pro-life, but how do we explain the reverse? Yet that recent Mitt Romney book claims he decided to do just that during his '94 bid to win the Massachusetts Senate.

After one pollster opined that a pro-life position would be a political liability for a statewide race in Massachusetts, Mitt decided to cast off his Church's "burdensome pro-life position" and embrace wholeheartedly the Roe v. Wade position that legalized abortion-on-demand for the full nine months of pregnancy.

To seal the deal with the abortion lobby of Massachusetts he even sent Planned Parenthood a donation!

Then, during a debate with Ted Kennedy for Senate, Mitt Romney actually looked right into the camera and said, with full conviction, "I believe that Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years, that we should sustain and support it, and I sustain and support that law and the right of a woman to make that choice."

Well . . . apparently Mitt had a pro-life change for the better 10 years later.

He credits a November 2004 meeting with a Harvard stem-cell researcher, while he was still Governor, as the moment that the scales fell from his eyes and he "realized" that the unborn needed his protection.

Yet, just how deep the change he had is still questionable.

Just months after his 2004 change of heart, he appointed a lifetime pro-abortion advocate to the Massachusetts bench.

Then, in 2005, after flopping around for a while on the issue of the so called "abortion pill" he flipped again, and finally came down on the wrong side -- not only legalizing but expanding state subsidies to pay for even more abortions pills.

But I suppose the most worrisome insight into his true pro-life convictions occurred in 2006.

Mitt Romney, following his success in forcing RomneyCare on all Bay Staters, expanded abortion services in his bill, and required that the MassHealth Payment Policy Board always have one member appointed by Planned Parenthood of Massachusetts.

He shrugs off that part when questioned about the plan he set in motion.

God bless him if he really has converted. Every pro-lifer will have to decide that for themselves.

But it seems that for many politicians the timing always coincides with their run for political office.

That's why it's so vital we keep the pressure on Mr. Romney to support a full pro-life agenda, including the Life at Conception Act, all the way until November 6 and beyond.

Since so many candidates blow back and forth with the wind -- right now -- while the candidates are looking for votes -- is the best time to make sure that the wind is blowing in our direction.

And given Mr. Romney's tendency to sway with the political winds, it’s even more important that you, and other National Pro-Life Alliance members, insist that candidates you support for the U.S. House and Senate pledge to support and cosponsor the Life at Conception Act.

By supporting the Life at Conception Act as a candidate litmus test, we can improve the positions and the pro-life resolve of all the candidates.

Sincerely,  
Martin Fox
Martin E. Fox, President
National Pro-Life Alliance.

P.S. If you can, please consider chipping in with a donation to help the National Pro-Life Alliance to expand our ongoing programs.


Breitbart's Coroner Dead Murder Arsenic Poisoning!

Scottish Police Say Bibles Are "Homophobic" Whaaaaat?

WND Breaking News

WorldNetDaily.com


GOP lawmaker: Eligibility too scary to take on
How special. A Republican lawmaker thinks it's appropriate for every candidate to prove his eligibility for office.

But when it comes to Obama's, he said he feared Congress standing up to the chief executive would trigger "a constitutional crisis unlike one we've seen since perhaps the Civil War."

Click here to read the full article.

Romney Obama the Same?

Egypt’s women urge MPs not to pass early marriage, sex-after-death laws: report

The parliamentary attacks on women’s rights has drawn great criticism from women’s organizations in Egypt. (File photo)
The parliamentary attacks on women’s rights has drawn great criticism from women’s organizations in Egypt. (File photo)
 
By Abeer Tayel
Al Arabiya
Egypt’s National Council for Women (NCW) has appealed to the Islamist-dominated parliament not to approve two controversial laws on the minimum age of marriage and allowing a husband to have sex with his dead wife within six hours of her death according to a report in an Egyptian newspaper.

The appeal came in a message sent by Dr. Mervat al-Talawi, head of the NCW, to the Egyptian People’s Assembly Speaker, Dr. Saad al-Katatni, addressing the woes of Egyptian women, especially after the popular uprising that toppled president Hosni Mubarak in February 2011.

She was referring to two laws: one that would legalize the marriage of girls starting from the age of 14 and the other that permits a husband to have sex with his dead wife within the six hours following her death.
According to Egyptian columnist Amro Abdul Samea in al-Ahram, Talawi’s message included an appeal to parliament to avoid the controversial legislations that rid women of their rights of getting education and employment, under alleged religious interpretations.

“Talawi tried to underline in her message that marginalizing and undermining the status of women in future development plans would undoubtedly negatively affect the country’s human development, simply because women represent half the population,” Abdul Samea said in his article.

The controversy about a husband having sex with his dead wife came about after a Moroccan cleric spoke about the issue in May 2011.

Zamzami Abdul Bari said that marriage remains valid even after death adding that a woman also too had the same right to engage in sex with her dead husband.

Two years ago, Zamzami incited further controversy in Morocco when he said it was permissible for pregnant women to drink alcohol.

But it seems his view on partners having sex with their deceased partners has found its way to Egypt one year on.

Egyptian prominent journalist and TV anchor Jaber al-Qarmouty on Tuesday referred to Abdul Samea’s article in his daily show on Egyptian ON TV and criticized the whole notion of “permitting a husband to have sex with his wife after her death under a so-called ‘Farewell Intercourse’ draft law.”

“This is very serious. Could the panel that will draft the Egyptian constitution possibly discuss such issues? Did Abdul Samea see by his own eyes the text of the message sent by Talawi to Katatni? This is unbelievable. It is a catastrophe to give the husband such a right! Has the Islamic trend reached that far? Is there really a draft law in this regard? Are there people thinking in this manner?”

Many members of the newly-elected, and majority Islamist parliament, have been accused of launching attacks against women’s rights in the country.

They wish to cancel many, if not most, of the laws that promote women’s rights, most notably a law that allows a wife to obtain a divorce without obstructions from her partner. The implementation of the Islamic right to divorce law, also known as the Khula, ended years of hardship and legal battles women would have to endure when trying to obtain a divorce.

Egyptian law grants men the right to terminate a marriage, but grants women the opportunity to end an unhappy or abusive marriages without the obstruction of their partner. Prior to the implementation of the Khula over a decade ago, it could take 10 to 15 years for a woman to be granted a divorce by the courts.

Islamist members of Egyptian parliament, however, accuse these laws of “aiming to destroy families” and have said it was passed to please the former first lady of the fallen regime, Suzanne Mubarak, who devoted much of her attention to the issues of granting the women all her rights.

The parliamentary attacks on women’s rights has drawn great criticism from women’s organizations, who dismissed the calls and accused the MPs of wishing to destroy the little gains Egyptian women attained after long years of organized struggle.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alleged proposals to allow Egyptian husbands to legally have sex with their dead wives for up to six hours after their death have been branded a 'complete nonsense'.
The controversial new 'farewell intercourse' law was claimed, in Arab media, to be part of a raft of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament.
They reported it would also see the minimum age of marriage lowered to 14 and the ridding of women's rights of getting education and employment.
Controversial: The 'farewell intercourse' law is 'a complete nonsense', according to sources
Controversial: The 'farewell intercourse' law is 'a complete nonsense', according to sources
But sources inside the Egyptian Embassy in London have said the claims were 'completely false', 'forbidden in Islam' and 'could never imagine it happening'.
The source said the proposal, if it even existed, had not reached the parliament - although it was also admitted it could be the work of an extremist politician.
Although not officially rebutted, the claims that someone inside Egypt could introduce such a law provoked widespread scepticism.

The initial report, published on reputable English language website alarabiya.net, claimed Egypt's National Council for Women was reportedly campaigning against the changes.
It said the group said that 'marginalising and undermining the status of women would negatively affect the country's human development'.
Dr Mervat al-Talawi, head of the NCW, wrote to the Egyptian People’s Assembly Speaker Dr Saad al-Katatni addressing her concerns.
Outrage: The 'proposals' could have seen Egyptian husbands allowed to have sex with their dead wives (file picture)
Outrage: The 'proposals' could have seen Egyptian husbands allowed to have sex with their dead wives (file picture)
Egyptian journalist Amro Abdul Samea reported in the al-Ahram newspaper that Talawi complained about the legislations which are being introduced under 'alleged religious interpretations'.
The subject of a husband having sex with his dead wife arose in May 2011 when Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari said marriage remains valid even after death.
He also said that women have the right to have sex with her dead husband.
TV anchor Jaber al-Qarmouty slammed the notion of letting a husband have sex with his wife after her death under the so-called 'Farewell Intercourse' draft law.
He said: 'This is very serious. Could the panel that will draft the Egyptian constitution possibly discuss such issues? Did Abdul Samea see by his own eyes the text of the message sent by Talawi to Katatni?
'This is unbelievable. It is a catastrophe to give the husband such a right! Has the Islamic trend reached that far? Is there really a draft law in this regard? Are there people thinking in this manner?'
 

Husband can have sex up to six hours with DEAD wives

Police Brutality Cop Beats Blind Doctor Canada

Surveillance Cams in Theaters Coming Soon (Texting during Movies Illegal...

Ron Paul Wins Louisiana Caucus

Wins four and a half of six congressional district caucuses, securing 111 of 150 or 74 percent of delegates elected yesterday to the state convention

LAKE JACKSON, Texas – Supporters of 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul won yesterday’s Louisiana caucus, securing an overwhelming majority of winnable delegates to the June Republican state convention that will affect the weight of the Paul delegation to the August Republican National Convention in Tampa.
Preliminary results from the Louisiana Republican Party indicate that Ron Paul supporters won majorities in Congressional Districts 1, 2, 5, and 6, with a narrow decision having occurred in District 4.  This means Ron Paul supporters won about four and a half of the six Congressional District caucus conventions held yesterday.
In each CD the top 25 delegates will go to the state convention on June 2nd in Shreveport.  Yesterday, 111 out of 150 or 74 percent of delegates elected today were in fact Ron Paul delegates.  The Louisiana state GOP soon will award 30 additional delegates.
A “conservative slate” ran a partially combined slate with establishment-moderate Mitt Romney in CDs 1, 2 and 4.  In each of those districts Ron Paul supporters required more votes than all of their opponents combined.  Remarkably, supporters of the 12-term Congressman from Texas accomplished this in CDs 1 and 2, but fell just short of this in CD 4, which is why the decision was split.
Taken together, victories across four and half CDs mean that Ron Paul supporters are likely to control the outcome of the state convention in June.
To be sure, a win on this scale gives Ron Paul supporters a majority of yesterday’s elected delegates and the ability to choose most of the at-large delegates, as well as the three National Delegates from CDs 1, 2, 5, and 6.
The Ron Paul campaign’s Louisiana State Director Pete Chamberlain said of the victory, “Yesterday’s result shows the changing dynamic among grassroots conservative activists dedicated to promoting a Republican platform that adheres to the Constitutional values Dr. Paul represents.  Back-room dealing and insider politics are no match for the grassroots enthusiasm that is the hallmark of the Ron Paul campaign.  Yesterday, Ron Paul’s dedicated Louisiana supporters showed what passionate, persistent activism can achieve when centered around a consistent message of freedom and prosperity.”
“Ron Paul’s victory shows his delegate-attainment strategy is working and demonstrates that the media and Washington pundits are underestimating his influence in the nominating process,’ said Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Manager John Tate.
“The Louisiana win forecasts a prominent role for Ron Paul at the RNC.  It also signals that the convention will feature a spirited discussion over whether conservatism will triumph over the status quo, all in relation to the end game of defeating President Obama,” added Mr. Tate.

Wanna know what happens when a senator endorses Romney at the Alaska State Convention?

Breaking News from Newsmax.com

President Ron Paul vs Puppet Romney

The Conservative Byte Headlines

Today's Politically Incorrect Laugh:
(Click to Enlarge)




Police probe: Breitbart's coroner poisoned to death?

WorldNetDaily.com


Police probe: Breitbart's coroner poisoned to death?
It just gets more mysterious.

Medical examiners in Los Angeles are now investigating the suspicious death of one of their own officials who may have worked on the case of Andrew Breitbart, the conservative powerhouse who died March 1, the same day Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced probable cause for forgery in President Obama's birth certificate.

Click here to read the full article.

Breaking News from Western Journalism

Apr 28, 2012 03:30 pm | Alan P. Halbert and Nick Chase

Many experts have weighed in on the analysis of Obama’s “certificate of live birth” and concluded that it is a forgery culminating in a probable cause finding of forgery and fraudulent document(s) by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office on March… Continue to Post

Cops say owners have to pay for repairs after Swat Team destroys condo

Expert: Obamacare to Herd Disabled Seniors to Bare-Bones Medicaid Plans

By Dave Eberhart

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former senior official at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the Bush administration, warns that under Obamacare disabled seniors who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid will receive inferior care, according to a report by the New York Post.

Gottlieb, an American Enterprise Institute resident fellow, says these low-income people who are elderly or have disabilities will be uprooted from the tried-and-true Medicare fold and “herded” into state-run Medicaid plans as another phase of Obamacare grips the nation.

“It’s hard to see how they’ll be better off in bare-bones, and sometimes poorly-run state Medicaid plans than by getting access to Medicare options they were entitled to before Obamacare,” Dr. Gottlieb lamented on Friday.

A so-called Obamacare “demonstration” program kicking-off in January will turn over management of such “dual-eligibles,” along with the money that the federal government was spending on their medical care to any state that wants to climb aboard the latest federal money wagon.

Some cash-strapped states are jumping at the chance to capture federal Medicare dollars for their Medicaid programs, according to Gottlieb.

Indeed, some anxious states have already committed to automatically placing these folks in existing Medicaid plans. Big problem lurking here, says Gottlieb: Such plans often aren’t equipped to serve an older, sicker group of patients. “That will mean big savings for the state and worse care for the vulnerable,” he concludes.

The doctor cites significant examples:

  • New York is looking to shift 700,000 “dual-eligibles” into a capitated managed-care model or HMO-style care. The target: Corral most of the elderly poor and disabled by 2015.
  •  California plans to move up to 1.1 million duals into its state-run Medicaid managed-care system.
These examples are but the tip of a huge green iceberg of big cash.
According to the Post report, Wall Street figures the entire “dual eligible” market at $350 billion a year.

While this is good news on The Street where the stocks of Medicaid HMOs are being bid skyward, Gottlieb is not consoled. “Care is likely to suffer. Many of these elderly poor also suffer from a lot of chronic ailments like diabetes and lung disease. [T]hese people have diverse medical problems, and have been most successfully served by Medicare programs that tailored services to their specific needs.”

Gottlieb’s bottom line: The Obamacare demonstration looks like an effort to shore up Medicaid by subsidizing it with Medicare dollars. “It’s another case of how Obamacare is designed to serve the existing health-care system, rather than transforming it to meet the needs of individual patients.”

Read more on Newsmax.com: Expert: Obamacare to Herd Disabled Seniors to Bare-Bones Medicaid Plans
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!