Police Raid Home For Prescription Drugs, Interrupt Final Deathbed Moments
By Patrick Frye Vernal, UT – Police raided a home searching for prescription drugs while the owner of the medications, Barbara Alice Mahaffey, still lay dying in bed from colon cancer. Without a warrant, they searched the house for prescription medications within minutes of the wife’s death, interrupting the husband’s final deathbed moments with his wife of 58 years.
Ben D. Mahaffey, 80, said he was treated as if he were street corner drug dealer planning to sell the painkillers oxycontin, oxycodone and morphine that his wife was taking. The sudden unexpected arrival of police and a mortician left Mahaffey distraught. According to the Deseret News, he was trying to make sure his wife’s body would be taken to the funeral home with dignity, when he says police officers Shawn Smith and Ron Eskelson insisted he help them count and confiscate the prescription drugs:
“I was indignant to think you can’t even have a private moment. All these people were there and they’re not concerned about her or me. They’re concerned about the damn drugs. Isn’t that something?”Vernal city manager Ken Bassett claims the Utah Controlled Substances Act provides authority for the police search for prescription drugs. Bassett claims Mahaffey was being “overly sensitive” and that police were just trying to protect the public from illegal use of prescription drugs.
According to The Salt Lake Tribune, Mahaffey has hired an attorney, Andrew Fackrell, to make his case that there’s nothing in Utah law that should allow police to enter a home and search for prescription drugs without a warrant:
“I don’t believe the public would intend for the government to be rummaging through your cupboards while your wife is lying in the next room being prepared to be taken to her final resting place. That’s an extraordinary violation of privacy.”
Fackrell said ”it’s apparently common practice
for Vernal police when someone dies, but that it’s selectively applied.
Some cities have voluntary take-back-prescription-drug programs, but
Fackrell said this takes it to an ‘absurd level.’” Do you think that
Utah police should pay for their deathbed intrusion?
Obama Admin Defended Agents Putting Gun To 11-year-old Girl’s Head
While
acting as if they are holier than the rest of us when it comes to gun
control, the Obama administration defended agents of the Drug
Enforcement Agency’s use of force against the 11-year-old and
14-year-old daughters of Thomas and Rosalie Avina. The “excessive”
force included putting a gun to the youngest girl’s head. Attorney’s
for the Obama administration defended the actions of the agents arguing
that “the DEA agents’ conduct was plainly reasonable under the
circumstances,” even though this took place in 2007 under the Bush
administration.
According to Reason.com:
After subduing their parents, agents broke into the two girls’ bedrooms during a wrong-door raid in January, 2007. The oldest of the two girls dropped to the floor and was handcuffed by agents before being dragged into the living room and laid next to her mom and dad. The 11-year-old, however, was sleeping when agents came into her room. As they began to shout at her to “get on the fucking ground,” the girl woke up and “froze in fear.” Agents then dragged her from her bed to the floor. One agent handcuffed her while another aimed a gun at her head.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in the matter that agents were acting within the law when it came to the parents, especially the father who resisted the orders barked out by the agents and was handcuffed at gunpoint. The Obama administration argued their case based on Muehler v. Mena, which established the right of law enforcement agents to detain residents during a raid for an unspecified amount of time (Notice that the term “rights” are being transferred from citizens to government officials).The Obama administration’s argument is based on the agents’ belief that the home they were preparing to raid on January 20, 2007, belonged to suspected drug trafficker Louis Alvarez, who “had a history of violence and resisting arrest.” The agents anticipated that Alvarez would be armed, and that the only way they could safely arrest him would be with an early morning raid. While agents would later learn that they had the wrong house, they didn’t know that when they battered down the Avinas’ front door, guns ready.
Just how did the Obama administration attorneys handle their presentation of the agents handling of the little girls?
Agents also entered the bedrooms of plaintiffs B.F. and B.S. Avina, who were then fourteen and eleven years old, respectively. Both girls were in bed at the time, and B.S. was sleeping. B.F. complied with the agents’ instruction to get on the ground, and the agents thereafter handcuffed her. B.S. initially resisted the instruction, and agents responded by assisting her to the floor and handcuffing her. The agents did not use profanity in speaking to the girls.They “assisted” her to the floor. Isn’t that a nice way to put things? Perhaps it was similar to the Elian Gonzalez raid. Remember that, where armed federal agents went in and took him from family to send him back to Cuba after his mother gave her life so that he could live in America?
At first the Obama attorneys said there was no profanity. Later they would simply play it down:
In response to plaintiffs’ contention that “the allegedly extensive use of profanity somehow contributes to a finding that the agents used unreasonable force,” the [lower] court noted that there was “no evidence that suggests any use of profanity was extensive.” To the contrary, the court observed that “the evidence demonstrates that the agents sparsely used profanity,” and “did so only in association with commands during entry directed solely at the adults.” Id. “Though B.F. Avina testified that she heard profanity used in the background during the agents’ entry, neither B.F. nor [B.S.] Avina testified that any of the agents used any profanity directed at them.” Id. (internal citation omitted).Yet according to the Ninth Circuit Court’s Ruling, the daughters did testify to their use of profanity. Not only that but the Obama attorney omitted that one of the officers aimed his firearm at the 11-year-old’s head.
The Obama administration asked the Court to uphold a lower court’s ruling on the matter:
Having probable cause to believe that a drug-trafficker was living at plaintiffs’ residence, DEA agents obtained warrants to arrest the suspect and to search the residence for firearms and other evidence of illegal drug-trafficking. Plaintiffs were home when agents executed the warrants, and the agents reasonably detained plaintiffs, in handcuffs, while securing the premises. Finding no evidence that the agents used force beyond that necessary to handcuff the plaintiffs, and concluding that the agents’ use of strong language was not excessive, the district court granted summary judgment for the United States on plaintiffs’ claims of assault and battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress. This Court should affirm the district court’s judgment, as plaintiffs have adduced no evidence indicating that state law would impose liability in like circumstances.In the end, DEA raided the wrong house. Surprise! Should they not be held accountable for their actions and lack of knowing where they should have raided? The Obama administration says “No”:
Plaintiffs [the Avinas] offer no argument or evidence suggesting that the agents did not in good faith act within the scope of the warrant in this case. As plaintiffs note, evidence exists that the affidavit supporting the warrant erroneously stated that Alvarez’s car was registered to plaintiffs’ address. But this deficiency was not apparent from the face of the warrant and therefore does not implicate the limited exception to Leon; there is no indication of any kind that the agents executing the warrant had reason to know of the error and acted other than in good faith. To the contrary, the statement in the affidavit regarding the registration would tend to confirm the existence of probable cause to search the residence.Ladies and gentlemen, it appears that the Obama administration wants you and your children to be defenseless in order that none of their “officers” are hurt during a raid on your home, but that’s not all. They really do want to remove as many firearms from the American public as they can. They want you to think they care about “the children.” But you can see from this case, that they will go to all sorts of lengths to disregard the fact that their agents used excessive profanity, excessive force, and brought to bear extreme emotional trauma on the minds of both of these girls, including putting a gun to one of their heads. Do you really think Barack Obama cares what happens to kids at a school in Newtown, Connecticut?
Freedom Outpost
 |  |
All out of ammo: US cops can’t stay stocked up as gun and bullet sales soar
 |
AFP Photo / Spencer Platt
|
“When you can’t get ammunition, it is very concerning,” Sandy Springs Police Chief Terry Sult tells WSBTV. “It affects our ability to be prepared. It affects the potential safety of the officers, because they’re not as proficient as they should be.”
The Sandy Springs Police Department is facing a shortage of tens of thousands of bullets and is scrambling to restock. The neighboring counties are facing an equally dire situation, with both practice ammunition and duty ammunition in short supply. Douglas County Chief Deputy Stan Copeland predicts it could be 6-8 months before the back-orders come in.
“We’re going to get very concerned at the six-month level if that’s all we have in stock, because then we have to start planning and rationing,” Sult says.
Local ammunition suppliers are attributing the shortage to the spike in gun and ammunition purchases by civilians after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting sparked debate on tighter gun control regulations.
FBI background checks for weapons hit a record 2.8 million in December, with most of those occurring after the Dec. 14 massacre. Last month also saw a drastic increase in gun sales, with every US state seeing a rise from the previous month. Ammunition sales were equally steep, with Brownells, the largest supplier of firearm accessories in the world, reporting that it has blown through several years’ worth of ammunition in just a matter of hours. The company apologized for its inability to meet consumer demands.
“There’s been a whole lot of hysteria raised by the [National Rifle Association] about the need to stockpile guns because Obama’s going to take your guns away,” Caroline Brewer, a spokeswoman for the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, tells ABC News. “It may mean more gun owners are buying more guns.”
Factories are now struggling to produce enough ammunition to keep up with demand, prompting police departments to share with neighboring counties in order to keep running. The federal government may have experienced a similar shortage if it didn’t prepare ahead of time: the Department of Homeland Security recently ordered 200,000 rounds of bullets at the cost of $45,000 dollars. The ammo will be delivered to a training site in South California.
The agency said there was already a shortage of bullets back in August, which made the threat of “substantial safety issues for the government” a very real one, should law enforcement officials not be adequately armed. The spikes in gun control, which came in waves after Obama’s reelection and the Sandy Hook massacre, drastically worsened the shortage.
Rather than purchasing ammo from their usual factory suppliers, police are now being forced to search local shops for the supplies they so desperately need.
“We’re having law enforcement agencies that are coming in and buying ammunition off the shelf, because, you know, they need it,” says Jay Wallace, owner of the Georgia-based Smyrna Police Distributors.
http://rt.com/usa/news/gun-sales-ammunition-police-662/
Patriot Update
TOP STORIES
- Americans are too smart for gun control – History of restriction is one of utter failure
- WY Lawmakers Propose ‘Gun Protection’ Legislation to Thwart Feds
- U.S. Falls in Economic Freedom Index
- Boehner takes flak from defense hawks on sequester stance
- Pastor for Obama’s inaugural drops out over anti-gay sermon
- Beware: 5 Terrible Tax Surprises
- White House Denies Petition to Deport Piers Morgan
- Jobless Claims Rise to 371K
- Watchdog Group Calls Tax Code “Unconscionable”… Demands Congress ‘Fix it’
- Senator: Obama Treasury Nominee Must ‘NEVER’ Be Confirmed
- Biden to Meet With NRA After “Gun Control by Executive Order” Statement
- Hillary Clinton: I am NOT retiring
- Attorney General Holder back at the table for Obama’s gun-control push
- Rep. Duncan on U.S. Gun Rights: ‘We Live In a Republic, Not a Dictatorship’
- Donald Trump sends Bill Maher birth certificate, awaits $5 million
- Gun Owners: America’s New Bad Guys
- Marine Denied the Medal of Honor by Obama Administration
- Piers Morgan: Debate Me
- A Dependent, Entitled America: The Lefts’ Fondest Dreams Come True
- Truman: Admiring A Man I Didn’t Necessarily Like
- Gun Control and Sandy Crooks
- Note To Conservatives: Never Stop Fighting For Individual Liberty
- Fiscal Cliff: Taxation Without Representation
- Question for Liberals: How Dumb Can You Get?
- The Body Count for the Media Just Increased by Three, But There Could Have Been Many More
- PatriotUpdate.com is dedicated to the ideals of a free press, featuring headlines submitted by our readers as well as daily commentary provided by our editors and guest writers. PatriotUpdate.com features over 20 exclusive columnists, and breaking news updates from around the nation and around the world.
TODAY'S CARTOON
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)