ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

YOUTUBE REMOVES MY BATMAN SANDY HOOK VIDEO, WHY ? Dahboo Knight is back...

Attorney General Secretly Granted Gov. Ability to Develop and Store Dossiers on Innocent Americans

Attorney General Eric Holder. Photo: Justice Department

By Kim Zetter

In a secret government agreement granted without approval or debate from lawmakers, the U.S. attorney general recently gave the National Counterterrorism Center sweeping new powers to store dossiers on U.S. citizens, even if they are not suspected of a crime, according to a news report.

Earlier this year, Attorney General Eric Holder granted the center the ability to copy entire government databases holding information on flight records, casino-employee lists, the names of Americans hosting foreign-exchange students and other data, and to store it for up to five years, even without suspicion that someone in the database has committed a crime, according to the Wall Street Journal, which broke the story.

Whereas previously the law prohibited the center from storing data compilations on U.S. citizens unless they were suspected of terrorist activity or were relevant to an ongoing terrorism investigation, the new powers give the center the ability to not only collect and store vast databases of information but also to trawl through and analyze it for suspicious patterns of behavior in order to uncover activity that could launch an investigation.

The changes granted by Holder would also allow databases containing information about U.S. citizens to be shared with foreign governments for their own analysis.

A former senior White House official told the Journal that the new changes were “breathtaking in scope.”

But counterterrorism officials tried to downplay the move by telling the Journal that the changes come with strict guidelines about how the data can be used.

“The guidelines provide rigorous oversight to protect the information that we have, for authorized and narrow purposes,” Alexander Joel, Civil Liberties Protection Officer for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, told the paper.

The NCTC currently maintains the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment database, or TIDE, which holds data on more than 500,000 identities suspected of terror activity or terrorism links, including friends and families of suspects, and is the basis for the FBI’s terrorist watchlist.

Under the new rules issued in March, the NCTC can now obtain almost any other government database that it claims is “reasonably believed” to contain “terrorism information.” This could conceivably include collections of financial forms submitted by people seeking federally backed mortgages or even the health records of anyone who sought mental or physical treatment at government-run hospitals, such as Veterans Administration facilities, the paper notes.

The Obama administration’s new rules come after previous surveillance proposals were struck down during the Bush administration, following widespread condemnation.

In 2002, the Pentagon’s Total Information Awareness program proposed to scrutinize both government and private databases, but public outrage killed the program in essence, though not in spirit. Although Congress de-funded the program in 2003, the NSA continued to collect and sift through immense amounts of data about who Americans spoke with, where they traveled and how they spent their money.

The Federal Privacy Act prohibits government agencies from sharing data for any purpose other than the reason for which the data was initially collected, in order to prevent the creation of dossiers, but agencies can do an end-run around this restriction by posting a notice in the Federal Register, providing justification for the data request. Such notices are rarely seen or contested, however.
The changes to the rules for the NCTC were sought in large part after authorities failed to catch Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab before he boarded a plane on Christmas Day in 2009 with explosives sewn into his underwear. Abdulmutallab wasn’t on the FBI watchlist, but the NCTC had received tips about him, and yet failed to search other government databases to connect dots that might have helped prevent him from boarding the plane.

As the NCTC tried to remedy that situation for later suspects, legal obstacles emerged, the Journal reports, since the center was only allowed to query federal databases for a specific name or a specific passenger list. “They couldn’t look through the databases trolling for general ‘patterns,’” the paper notes.

But the request to expand the center’s powers led to a heated debate at the White House and the Department of Homeland Security, with Mary Ellen Callahan, then-chief privacy officer for the Department of Homeland Security, leading the charge to defend civil liberties. Callahan argued that the new rules represented a “sea change” and that every interaction a citizen would have with the government in the future would be ruled by the underlying question, is that person a terrorist?

Callahan lost her battle, however, and subsequently left her job, though it’s not known if her struggle over the NCTC debate played a role in her decision to leave.

Watchman Video Broadcast 12-16-2012 The Mayan Calendar and the Seventh ...

WOW !! SANDY HOOK & AURORA In BATMAN Movie ! Make Viral ~ This is a SET ...


This is exactly the same way that spy agencies sent messages during WWI and WWII. They would sent messages to their field agents using the classifieds and cartoon pages in the public newspapers! Only now they are using the movies and television! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgJzc1g3KFQ

Are The Police Threatening "Conspiracy Theorists" Over The Sandy Hook Sh...

Christmas, A Biblical Perspective

 
Like a cage is full of birds (Jeremiah 5:27), so the "Christian" community is full of deceit (2 Timothy 3:1-5; 2 Peter 2:1-3), and the Christmas celebration is just one small sampling of the deception of this age (2 Timothy 4:3).
I. Its History
According to history, the Catholic church in the 4th century adapted (Christianized) the evil idolatry of its day. In the Encyclopedia Britannica (Macropaedia, 1978 edition, Vol. 15, p.1062-1063) under Roman Religion, the following is written:
The survival of Roman religion. For a time, coins and other monuments continued to link Christian doctrines with the worship of the sun, to which Constantine had been addicted previously. But even when this phase came to an end, Roman paganism continued to exert other, permanent influences, . . . [then speaking of the ecclesiastical calendar] notably Christmas, which blends elements including both the feast of Saturnalia and the birthday of Mithra.
In Christmas Traditions by William Muir Auld, he states:
This strange Eastern faith, whose god Mithra was identified with the Unconquered Sun, long proved the most formidable rival of Christianity. (p. 29)
The birthday of Mithra (the sun god) was December 25. Instead of opposing this idolatry, the Catholic church literally made up the idea that December 25 was Christ's birthday, and celebrated the pagan holiday with a new name, "Christmas." In a children's book entitled Christmas (by Jane Duden), the following is said:
At first, only a small number of people in the Roman Empire were Christians. All the non-Christians were called pagans. The pagans had festivals of their own on or near December 25. For example, Romans held year-end celebrations to honor Mithra, their god of light.
One of the most popular pagan festivals was Saturnalia .... People gave gifts to each other and prepared special foods. They decorated their homes with green branches. Everywhere, people stopped work to join in the celebration.
Christian leaders did not have an easy time converting non-Christians (or pagans) to the Christian religion. Pagans liked their harvest and winter festivities. They did not want to give them up. That is why, over the years, popes (the spiritual rulers of the Roman Catholic church) and church leaders allowed many favorite ancient customs to become part of Christmas celebrations. (p. 8-9)
Furthermore, in The Solstice Evergreen, The History, Folklore and Origins of the Christmas Tree, Sheryl Ann Karas notes:
Converting the Pagans. During its first 300 years, the church in Rome maintained a staunch position against all pagan beliefs and practices; however, many new and potential converts were reluctant to give up their familiar celebrations. One of the most popular holidays in the Roman year was the Saturnalia. It was a week-making, culminating in a winter solstice feast on December 25, called Natilis Solis Invictior the birthday of the Unconquerable Sun. The holiday honored the strength of the sun and the fertility it would soon bring to the earth.
In 375 A.D., the [Catholic] Church announced that the birth date of Christ had been discovered to be December 25, and allowed some of the light-hearted customs of the older celebration, such as feasting, dancing and the exchange of gifts, to be incorporated into the reverent observance of Christmas. The use of greenery, however, popularly used to decorate homes and holy places during Saturnalia, was still prohibited as pagan idolatry. (p.88)
And,
Certain popular holidays, such as Yule, and customs such as lighting candles and offering small sacrifices under certain holy trees could not be easily suppressed, so they were given new meanings. Yuletide rituals were incorporated into Christmas. The candles were lit to remember Christ as light of the world. The holy offerings came to symbolize the gifts the wise men brought. (p. 91)
She also most interestingly says:
Many people like to de-emphasize our pagan heritage. We have been taught to associate paganism with violent practices and, therefore, find it threatening to see pagan aspects in our modern 'civilized' religions. Yet paganism is much more than human sacrifice. It is part of our spiritual past. In the case of the Christmas Tree, this knowledge can enrich the celebration of the ritual for even the most fundamental Christian and revitalize the winter holidays for those who are not. (p. 5)
Additionally, The Zondervan Pictoral Encyclopedia of the Bible (Vol. A-C, p. 804) states:
Gradually a number of the prevailing practices of the nations into which Christianity came were assimilated and were combined with the religious ceremonies surrounding Christmas. The assimilation of such practices generally represented efforts by Christians to transform or absorb otherwise pagan practices.
In The Glory and Pageantry of Christmas by the editors of Time-Life Books, the following is acknowledged:
Christians began absorbing these old customs and infusing them with Christian meaning in order to help spread the faith. Many Church fathers considered the method dangerous . . .
But most of the Christian missionaries who moved into Central and Western Europe as the Roman Empire crumbled, followed the advice of Gregory the Great. He wrote, in 597, that they should not try to put down pagan customs "upon the sudden," but adapt them "to the praise of God." (p. 114)
Was this godly advice? Not at all! In Christmas Traditions by William Muir Auld, he states:
. . . St. Chrysostom, Bishop of Constantinople (398-403) . . . makes reference to the heathen festival of the sun-god and says, "On this day also the Birthday of Christ was lately fixed at Rome in order that while the heathen were busy with their profane ceremonies the Christians might perform their sacred rites undisturbed. They call this (Dec.25, . . .), the Birthday of the Invincible One (Mithra); but who so invincible as the Lord? They call it the Birthday of the Solar Disc; but Christ is the Sun of Righteousness." (p. 31-32)
This is very deceptive, and is not what God has called saints to do (Romans 12:9, "Abhor what is evil.").
During the Middle Ages, Christmas was linked up to something very wicked. Notice what Frank Muir says in his book Christmas Customs and Traditions:
All Hallows Eve, 31 October, was traditionally the day on which the Lord of Misrule was appointed for the Christmas to come. He would then reign through till Candlemas, 2 February. Known by other names, "The Master of Merry Disport", "The Abbot of Unreason", "Christmas King", . . . The Lord of Misrule was the personification of the spirit of disorder, fun and merrymaking which made the Christmas holidays something to look forward to in the Middle Ages; (p. 13)
The Lord of Misrule was a principal ingredient in the medieval celebration of Christmas. However, his revelries were far too pagan for the Puritans of the seventeenth century who violently attacked him and eventually banned his election altogether. (p. 14)
Was the Catholic Church right in assimilating (Christianizing) the evil idol worship of their day? No way! In I Thessalonians 1:8-10, Paul comments that they turned from idols, to the living God. In other words, they turned away from idols. They had nothing to do with them any more. See also 1 Thessalonians 5:22 where Paul exhorts them to "abstain from every form of evil", or Acts 14:8-15 where Paul and Barnabas tell the men in Lystra, ". . . you should turn from these useless things to the living God." Their message was not one of assimilation!

II. Christmas Today

Most of the meaning (at least understood by the masses) of the god "Mithra" (idolatry), the festival of Saturn (idolatry), and the other pagan practices are all but forgotten. Yet, at what point in time did this paganism become holy? It never became holy.

Some look to Romans 14:5-6 in regards to Christmas. But, Romans 14 (notice verse one) speaks of doubtful things. As we will see, this is not a doubtful thing. It is a matter of a false Christ and the worship of God in falsehood, rather than in truth (John 4:24).

Christmas in America today is celebrated basically in four ways:

1. Celebration of the coming of Santa Claus

2. Celebration of the coming of Christ and the coming of Santa Claus

3. Celebration of a secular nature (no Christ, no Santa Claus)

4. Celebration of Christ's birth

How about those who celebrate the coming of Santa Claus? Santa Claus: "He knows when you are sleeping. He knows when you're awake. He knows if you've been bad or good, so be good for goodness sake." These words describe a god (only a god could do such things worldwide). Santa Claus is a false god (an idol, 1 John 5:21). Even though it's all "make-believe", it still is evil. He looks good and clean. 2 Corinthians 11:14 warns us of the schemes of the Devil and his crafty ways.

Satan transforms himself into an angel of light. The whole Santa Claus concept is evil to the core (a false god), yet sugar coated to deceive the unsuspecting.

How about those who celebrate the coming of Christ and the coming of Santa Claus? In our culture, it is not unlikely to see a nativity scene along with Santa Claus and his reindeer (some even have Santa Claus in the nativity scene). Is such a thing pleasing in the sight of God, mixing a false god with Christ? No way (e.g. Zephaniah 1:4-5-)!

How about those who celebrate Xmas secularly (no Christ, no Santa Claus)? These folks usually just have a feast, Christmas tree, exchange gifts, etc.. Have you ever pondered the "ghost of Christmas past" in the story of Ebenezer Scrooge? In this story there is no Santa Claus. This "ghost of Christmas past" teaches Mr. Scrooge to "keep Christmas in his heart." (p. 43 in Christmas, by Jane Duden).

From a Biblical perspective, it's the demon of Christmas past. Knowing the whole world lies in the sway of the wicked one (1 John 5:19), this is an interesting well-known and common tale. The story may be fictional, but there is an agenda nevertheless (1 John 5:19; Revelation 12:9).

Something else that we should take note of is a comment made in the Solstice Evergreen, by Sheryl Ann Karas. She was raised in a Jewish family and she says this about Christmas:
What I yearned for was the magic, the specialness of the day. And the most magical thing of all for me was the Christmas Tree. (p. 3)
And,
Throughout the Christmas season celebrations include the tree as a centerpiece. Carols are sung around it. Gifts are exchanged beneath it. Christmas dinner guests take special care to compliment the hosts on its beauty. Nobody claims to worship the tree, but if a visitor from another planet interpreted these rituals in such a way it would hardly be surprising.
And,
Why else would anyone do something so strange, so whimsical, and so special? (p. 8)
And,
The Christmas Tree is not just a pretty thing to look at. It has a special place in the spiritual history of us all and, since its ancient symbolism is embedded in our familiar modern religions, it still has the power to stir us deep in our primal souls. (p. 106)
Granted, people don't claim to "worship" their Christmas tree. But, are they? Remember the song, "Oh Christmas tree, oh Christmas tree . . ."? If you compare the Christmas tree with Jeremiah 10:1-4, there are some striking similarities.

How about those who simply celebrate Xmas as a celebration of Christ's birth? First of all, the Christ of "Christmas" is not the Christ of the Bible. Here are three sound reasons why we should come to such a conclusion:

I. It is not Biblical (i.e., not from Christ).

Nothing in Scripture directs us to celebrate the birth of Christ, and none of the practices associated with Christmas are Biblical. This alone should cause us to fear (John 4:24). Moreover, December 25, for a date of the Lord's birth, is a one out of 365 chance to be true.

II. Christ is Holy (i.e., separate, Hebrews 7:26).

A. The term "Christmas" is blasphemous. Its etymology (word history) is from "Christ-mass", "mass" being the Catholic church's Communion (the Eucharist) where they claim the bread and juice turn into the actual body and blood of Jesus (called "transubstantiation"). Christ is sacrificed at each mass.

This goes directly against Hebrews 9:27-28; 10:11-18.

B. Historically, from the first Christmas to the present day, Christmas has always been associated with idolatry and wicked superstitious customs (in the past, Mithra, the sun god; today, Santa Claus, magic, sorcery, the god of materialism). The Holy Christ of the Bible calls people to repent from their paganism (Acts 17:16-31), not to "Christianize" it.

III. It's a false christ.

The world (overall, especially here in America) adores (loves, worships) the Christ of Christmas. The world abhors (hates, rejects) the true Christ (John l:ll; 7:7). Mormons have their Christ. Jehovah Witnesses have their Christ. Unitarians have their Christ. Catholics have their Christ. Christmas has its Christ (which is basically a Catholic Christ).

When Jesus Christ returns, do you think He will return as the Christ of Christmas (Revelation 19:11-16)? Certainly not! Even when He came as a babe, this prophecy was made concerning Him, "...a sign which will be spoken against..." (Luke 2:34). The world hates the true Christ.

Someone might say, "Well, when we celebrate Christmas, we are celebrating the birth of the Christ of the Bible." That's a lie! The Christ of Christmas is not the Christ of the Bible. The Israelites were told the same kind of lie in Exodus 32:4-5 with the golden calf. They were told,
This is your god, O Israel, that brought you out of the land of Egypt!
And Aaron made a proclamation and said, "Tomorrow is a feast to the Lord." (Hebrew "to Yahweh").
Jesus said in John 4:24,
God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.
What is to be our perspective towards evil and a false "Christ"? It is to be this:
Little children, keep yourselves from idols. (1 John 5:21)
We are to flee idolatry (1 Corinthians 10:14), "Abhor what is evil." (Romans 12:9), "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them." (Ephesians 5:8-11).

We are to turn away from evil (1 Peter 3:11) and "not imitate evil" (3 John 11).

When we think about worshiping Christ and celebrating His birth, we should also consider what the Lord told the Israelites in Deuteronomy 12:30-32:
take heed to yourself that you are not ensnared to follow them, . . . and that you do not inquire after their gods, saying, "How did these nations serve their gods? I also will do likewise." You shall not worship the Lord your God in that way. (i.e., in the same way or manner that the pagans worship their gods).
It is a serious error to worship God in the wrong way. Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, found this out the hard way when they offered up the wrong kind of incense to the Lord in Leviticus 10. The Lord killed them with fire! Should we not take heed to the words of Moses as he exhorted Aaron in regards to this event?
This is what the Lord spoke, saying, "By those who come near Me I must be regarded as holy; and before all the people I must be glorified." (Leviticus 10:3)
John MacArthur wrote in his booklet, Six Ways Satan Is Stealing Christmas,
If you've been missing the reality of Christmas in your life, know that if you receive the Lord Jesus Christ and believe in His name, Christmas will become real to you. (p. 20)
Is this what we want - Christmas to "become real" to people? A true Christian would not want a false christ to "become real" to people.

Consider a few questions: What kind of message are we sending the world in celebrating Christmas?

That God is ecumenical, or eclectic? Or, that He is Holy? Is Christmas a clear picture of the gospel?

Hardly! What is core to the gospel? Repentance! Repentance from what? All your wicked ways (Isaiah 55:6-7). Christmas is a billboard of a blend of wickedness and Christianity; thus not constituting a complete repentance from all wickedness. What are we trying to avoid by "Christianizing" Christmas? Persecution (being an outcast)! The fear of man brings a snare (Proverbs 29:25). People resist this, because they have their hearts (minds) on this world (earth), not on the things above (Colossians 3:2).

What's the problem with celebrating Jesus' birth on December 25? The problem is that it is a lie. It is not the birth of the true Christ that is being celebrated. It is the birth of a false Christ - which is idolatry - which is demonic (Leviticus 17:7; Deuteronomy 32:17; 2 Chronicles 11:15; Psalm 106:37; I Corinthians 10:20-21). The Christ of Christmas, who is loved by the world, was never conceived in Mary's womb. This false Christ is either a demon (or demons) or Satan himself, and neither have been born into the human race for the propitiation of the sins of mankind.

In and of themselves, there is nothing wrong with giving gifts or having a feast, but when it is done in the name of a false christ (idolatry), it is to be opposed (Romans 12:9). As the true Christ condemned the "Christians" of Pergamos and Thyatira for eating things in the name of an idol (Revelation 2:14, 20), so should we oppose that which is done in the name of this modern, yet deceptive, practice of idolatry called Christmas.

We should also note that Jesus refused to line Himself up with the practices of the religion of His day (the "right one", Judaism and their practices, and the Pharisees). How much more would He refuse to line Himself up with Santa Claus and all the trappings of this "Christ-mass"?

What has God called us to? A holy life!
but as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, because it is written, "Be holy, for I am holy." (1 Peter 1:15-16; see also Hebrews 12:14)
The Psalmist calls out in Psalm 94:16,
Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? Who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?
Believers are called to call the world to repentance. That's what Jesus' message was (Matthew 4:17), not to make them feel good or assimilate their ways into ours (when it is evil), or our ways into theirs. As Romans 12:1 says, "Do not be conformed to this world." [By the way, if family problems are encountered because of a refusal to celebrate Christmas, see Luke 12:49-53.]
John MacArthur wrote,
Christians today are generally not opposed to celebrating Christmas. The holiday itself is nothing, and observing it is not a question of right or wrong. (God With Us, copyright 1989, p. 25)
Is that our standard? If Christians today aren't opposed to it then neither should we? Or, is it true that "the holiday itself is nothing" (Santa Claus -- a make-believe false god, a false christ, and the "spirit of Christmas" - a demon or demons, or Satan himself)? Let us not be persuaded by what others are doing around us (Paul had Demas leave him, 2 Timothy 4:10; and all forsook him, 2 Timothy 1:13-15), but let us be persuaded by the Scriptures and apply them with zeal (Psalm 119:60).

When was the last time you heard someone preach on 1 Corinthians 16:22, "If anyone does not love the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be accursed"? Some things are not popular, thus you don't hear them very often (if ever). Speaking against Christmas is certainly not popular, but let's face the facts and ask God to deliver us from the brainwashing of the society in which we live. May He grant to us lives that fully please Him (holy, separate from all evil) and that are ever increasing in the knowledge of God (Colossians 1:10).


a true church
P. O. Box 130, Moodys, OK 74444
1-800-HOW-TRUE
www.atruechurch.info

1. What's Wrong With Christmas (A synopsis of the Christmas issue)

2. A Letter To An Unbelieving Family

Social media users spreading false information about Sandy Hook massacre could face charges, say police

Following the killing spree at Sandy Hook Elementary School some social media users took to Twitter to spread false information about the shootings.















 State Police spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance briefs the media and answers questions about the elementary school shooting before releasing the names of the victims during a press conference at Treadwell Memorial Park on December 15, 2012 in Newtown, Connecticut. Twenty six people were shot dead, including twenty children, after a gunman identified as Adam Lanza opened fire at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Lanza also reportedly had committed suicide at the scene. A 28th person, believed to be Nancy Lanza was found dead in a house in town, was also believed to have been shot by Adam Lanza. 

Jared Wickerham/Getty Images

State Police spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance speaks about the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., Saturday. He delivered another update Sunday morning.

Connecticut officials cautioned against the spread of false information on social media sites in the wake of Friday’s massacre.

Anyone who posts fake material about the rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School or killer Adam Lanza could face arrest, Connecticut State Police spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance said at a press conference Sunday.

“There has been misinformation coming from people posing as the shooter in this case, using other IDs, mimicking this crime and crime scene,” Vance said, adding that some of the posts are of a “threatening manner.”

“It's important to note that we have discussed this with federal authorities. These things are crimes. They will be investigated and prosecuted.”

BOMB THREAT SPARKS EVACUATION AT CHURCH AS HUNDREDS MOURN VICTIMS OF SANDY HOOK MASSACRE
PHOTOS: SANDY HOOK SCHOOL SHOOTING

Threat 1

Allison Joyce/New York Daily News

Saint Rose of Lima Roman Catholic Church was evacuated Sunday after someone called in a bomb threat during a mass for the victims of Sandy Hook. 

Vance said people have also been posting from fake accounts purporting to be the Newtown city police or the Connecticut state police.

Neither organization has been using social media to provide updates about the deadly shooting.
“All information relative to this case is coming from these microphones," he said.

GRISLY DETAILS EMERGE IN SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOOTING 
PHOTOS: VICTIMS OF SANDY HOOK MASSACRE

Officials are currently working to identify and question those responsible for the spread of misinformation, Vance added.

Authorities have not yet revealed a motive behind Lanza’s Friday morning killing spree. The 20-year-old fatally shot 26 people, including 20 children ages 6 and 7, before turning a gun on himself.

Threat

Allison Joyce/New York Daily News

Officers eventually cleared the threat Sunday. 

Initial reports of the massacre were marked by confusing and, at times, contradictory information.
The gunman was initially identified as Ryan Lanza after police discovered an ID bearing that name on the shooter’s body.

SANDY HOOK KILLER WAS STILL ALIVE WHEN POLICE ARRIVED AT SCHOOL 

It was later revealed that the ID belonged to the shooter’s older brother.
croberts@nydailynews.com

WATCH: CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE UPDATE ON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRAGEDY

Sealing Series # 42 Righteousness By His Faith Part 8

Freedom Outpost

Sandy Hook: ►"Hunger Games Author / Gotham Map!◄