|
October
09 2012
|
||||
| |||||
ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT
Breaking News from Western Journalism
Oct 09, 2012 02:41 pm | Gabor Zolna
Oct 09, 2012 02:31 pm | Breaking News
Washington,
D.C. – A new report from the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion
& Public Life shows that the number of Americans who do not identify
with any religion is growing at a rapid pace. About one-fifth of the
U.S. public –… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 02:25 pm | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 02:24 pm | Steve Deace
In
our last update on the metrics of the 2012 campaign, when Election Day
was 50 days away, we said that the next potential momentum swing would
come in the days following the crucial first presidential debate.
We turned out… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 02:15 pm | Kris Zane
Oct 09, 2012 02:10 pm | Dr. Kevin "Coach" Collins
Barack
Obama leads 46/44 in a new Investor’s Business Daily/Christian Science
Monitor/TIPP Poll. Well, that’s what they are saying anyway.
The TIPP poll shows that Mitt Romney has closed up a 7 point deficit
since last month – oh how generous of them! Like… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 02:05 pm | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 02:04 pm | Matt Barber
The
emperor wears no clothes. The bloom is off the rose. The bigger they
are, the harder they fall. Pardon the barrage of stale metaphors, but
it’s difficult to put into words the utter pasting Mitt Romney put on
Barack… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 02:03 pm | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 01:59 pm | Dr. Kevin "Coach" Collins
A
just-released Politico/George Washington University Battleground
Tracking Poll (PGWUBTP) says that Barack Obama is leading 49/48, a
statistical tie reached before the debate. That is the extent of the
good news for Obama. This is another poll whose underpinnings fall
short of… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 01:53 pm | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 01:50 pm | Breaking News
When
President Obama and others on the left are not busy admonishing the
rest of us to be “civil” in our discussions of political issues, they
are busy letting loose insults, accusations and smears against those who
dare to disagree… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 01:44 pm | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 01:43 pm | Breaking News
Barack
Obama lied in 2008 about so much. He promised so much he had no
intention of fulfilling. He deceived the American people with noble
ideas he would never carry out.
After four years of witnessing these lies, these broken… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 01:35 pm | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 01:34 pm | Breaking News
Minutes
after Newsweek published a story on the threat of illegal foreign and
fraudulent online campaign donations late Monday afternoon, the Obama
campaign struck back hard with a response smearing one of the article’s
authors and offered an anemic defense… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 01:31 pm | Gabor Zolna
Oct 09, 2012 01:30 pm | Susan Stamper Brown
If
the federal government was meant to create jobs, it would have created a
surplus of them by now; and unemployment would be far below 7.8 percent
— considering the exorbitant amount of money the Obama administration
has, as it… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 12:57 pm | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 12:50 pm | Breaking News
If
the shocking allegations contained in a lawsuit filed last Friday by
responsible science advocate Steven Milloy are accurate, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has a major scandal on its hands.
As reported by the National Legal and Policy Center,… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 12:48 pm | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 12:46 pm | Breaking News
The
Department of Homeland Security has announced in a solicitation to
drone manufacturers that it will begin testing “Robotic Aircraft For
Public Safety” at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, indicating that small spy drones
will be used to keep tabs on Americans… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 12:43 pm | Daniel Noe
I
say this is why we need to get out of the Middle East…the sooner we
learn that our actions are provoking the rise of these groups, the safer
we will all be.… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 12:33 pm | Breaking News
TOKYO
(OfficialWire) — Plagued by uncertainty and fresh setbacks, the world
economy has weakened further and will grow more slowly over the next
year, the International Monetary Fund says in its latest forecast.
Advanced economies are risking recession, the international… Continue to Post
Oct 09, 2012 11:58 am | Daniel Noe
Oct 09, 2012 05:33 am | Cagle Cartoons
Protestants no longer the majority in US, study says
Associated Press NEW YORK – For the first time in
its history, the United States does not have a Protestant majority,
according to a new study. One reason: The number of Americans with no
religious affiliation is on the rise.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/09/protestants-no-longer-majority-in-us-study-says/?test=latestnews#ixzz28qRpAysn
The percentage of Protestant adults in the U.S. has reached a low of
48 percent, the first time that Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
has reported with certainty that the number has fallen below 50 percent.
The drop has long been anticipated and comes at a time when no
Protestants are on the U.S. Supreme Court and the Republicans have their
first presidential ticket with no Protestant nominees.
Among the reasons for the change are the growth in nondenominational Christians who can no longer be categorized as Protestant, and a spike in the number of American adults who say they have no religion. The Pew study, released Tuesday, found that about 20 percent of Americans say they have no religious affiliation, an increase from 15 percent in the last five years.
Scholars have long debated whether people who say they no longer belong to a religious group should be considered secular. While the category as defined by Pew researchers includes atheists, it also encompasses majorities of people who say they believe in God, and a notable minority who pray daily or consider themselves "spiritual" but not "religious." Still, Pew found overall that most of the unaffiliated aren't actively seeking another religious home, indicating that their ties with organized religion are permanently broken.
Growth among those with no religion has been a major preoccupation of American faith leaders who worry that the United States, a highly religious country, would go the way of Western Europe, where church attendance has plummeted. Pope Benedict XVI has partly dedicated his pontificate to combating secularism in the West. This week in Rome, he is convening a three-week synod, or assembly, of bishops from around the world aimed at bringing back Roman Catholics who have left the church.
The trend also has political implications. American voters who describe themselves as having no religion vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. Pew found Americans with no religion support abortion rights and gay marriage at a much higher-rate than the U.S. public at large. These "nones" are an increasing segment of voters who are registered as Democrats or lean toward the party, growing from 17 percent to 24 percent over the last five years. The religiously unaffiliated are becoming as important a constituency to Democrats as evangelicals are to Republicans, Pew said.
The Pew analysis, conducted with PBS' "Religion & Ethics Newsweekly," is based on several surveys, including a poll of nearly 3,000 adults conducted June 28-July 9, 2012. The finding on the Protestant majority is based on responses from a larger group of more than 17,000 people and has a margin of error of plus or minus 0.9 percentage points, Pew researchers said. Pew said it had also previously calculated a drop slightly below 50 percent among U.S. Protestants, but those findings had fallen within the margin of error; the General Social Survey, which is conducted by the University of Chicago's National Opinion Research Center, reported for 2010 that the percentage of U.S. Protestants was around 46.7 percent.
Researchers have been struggling for decades to find a definitive reason for the steady rise in those with no religion.' The spread of secularism in Western Europe was often viewed as a byproduct of growing wealth in the region. Yet among industrialized nations, the United States stood out for its deep religiosity in the face of increasing wealth.
Now, religion scholars say the decreased religiosity in the United States could reflect a change in how Americans describe their religious lives. In 2007, 60 percent of people who said they seldom or never attend religious services still identified themselves as part of a particular religious tradition. In 2012, that statistic fell to 50 percent, according to the Pew report.
"Part of what's going on here is that the stigma associated with not being part of any religious community has declined," said John Green, a specialist in religion and politics at the University of Akron, who advised Pew on the survey. "In some parts of the country, there is still a stigma. But overall, it's not the way it used to be."
The Pew study has found the growth in unaffiliated Americans spans a broad range of groups: men and women, college graduates and those without a college degree, people earning less than $30,000 annually and those earning $75,000 or more. However, along ethnic lines, the largest jump in "nones" has been among whites. One-fifth of whites describe themselves as having no religion.
More growth in "nones" is expected. One-third of adults under age 30 have no religious affiliation, compared to 9 percent of people 65 and older. Pew researchers wrote that "young adults today are much more likely to be unaffiliated than previous generations were at a similar stage in their lives," and aren't expected to become more religiously active as they age.
Among the reasons for the change are the growth in nondenominational Christians who can no longer be categorized as Protestant, and a spike in the number of American adults who say they have no religion. The Pew study, released Tuesday, found that about 20 percent of Americans say they have no religious affiliation, an increase from 15 percent in the last five years.
Scholars have long debated whether people who say they no longer belong to a religious group should be considered secular. While the category as defined by Pew researchers includes atheists, it also encompasses majorities of people who say they believe in God, and a notable minority who pray daily or consider themselves "spiritual" but not "religious." Still, Pew found overall that most of the unaffiliated aren't actively seeking another religious home, indicating that their ties with organized religion are permanently broken.
Growth among those with no religion has been a major preoccupation of American faith leaders who worry that the United States, a highly religious country, would go the way of Western Europe, where church attendance has plummeted. Pope Benedict XVI has partly dedicated his pontificate to combating secularism in the West. This week in Rome, he is convening a three-week synod, or assembly, of bishops from around the world aimed at bringing back Roman Catholics who have left the church.
The trend also has political implications. American voters who describe themselves as having no religion vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. Pew found Americans with no religion support abortion rights and gay marriage at a much higher-rate than the U.S. public at large. These "nones" are an increasing segment of voters who are registered as Democrats or lean toward the party, growing from 17 percent to 24 percent over the last five years. The religiously unaffiliated are becoming as important a constituency to Democrats as evangelicals are to Republicans, Pew said.
The Pew analysis, conducted with PBS' "Religion & Ethics Newsweekly," is based on several surveys, including a poll of nearly 3,000 adults conducted June 28-July 9, 2012. The finding on the Protestant majority is based on responses from a larger group of more than 17,000 people and has a margin of error of plus or minus 0.9 percentage points, Pew researchers said. Pew said it had also previously calculated a drop slightly below 50 percent among U.S. Protestants, but those findings had fallen within the margin of error; the General Social Survey, which is conducted by the University of Chicago's National Opinion Research Center, reported for 2010 that the percentage of U.S. Protestants was around 46.7 percent.
Researchers have been struggling for decades to find a definitive reason for the steady rise in those with no religion.' The spread of secularism in Western Europe was often viewed as a byproduct of growing wealth in the region. Yet among industrialized nations, the United States stood out for its deep religiosity in the face of increasing wealth.
Now, religion scholars say the decreased religiosity in the United States could reflect a change in how Americans describe their religious lives. In 2007, 60 percent of people who said they seldom or never attend religious services still identified themselves as part of a particular religious tradition. In 2012, that statistic fell to 50 percent, according to the Pew report.
"Part of what's going on here is that the stigma associated with not being part of any religious community has declined," said John Green, a specialist in religion and politics at the University of Akron, who advised Pew on the survey. "In some parts of the country, there is still a stigma. But overall, it's not the way it used to be."
The Pew study has found the growth in unaffiliated Americans spans a broad range of groups: men and women, college graduates and those without a college degree, people earning less than $30,000 annually and those earning $75,000 or more. However, along ethnic lines, the largest jump in "nones" has been among whites. One-fifth of whites describe themselves as having no religion.
More growth in "nones" is expected. One-third of adults under age 30 have no religious affiliation, compared to 9 percent of people 65 and older. Pew researchers wrote that "young adults today are much more likely to be unaffiliated than previous generations were at a similar stage in their lives," and aren't expected to become more religiously active as they age.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/09/protestants-no-longer-majority-in-us-study-says/?test=latestnews#ixzz28qRpAysn
Big Health Report News
Zionica News
| TODAY'S HEADLINES: |
RECENT NEWS YOU MAY HAVE
MISSED:
|
| NEWS FROM OTHER MEMBERS OF THE LIBERTY ALLIANCE: |
Federal Judge Halts New Orleans’ Ban on street preaching after three arrested
By: Heather Clark
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Louisiana states that it obtained the restraining order during a brief telephone hearing this afternoon. The organization had filed suit earlier in the day, requesting that the court grant a temporary freeze on the ordinance until the case moves forward in federal court.
The ACLU represented Kelsey McCauley-Bohn in the lawsuit, who was one of the six Christians that had been arrested last Friday night while ministering on Bourbon Street in the city’s French Quarter.
While not handcuffed and charged, McCauley-Bohn, along with the others, followed officers to the 8th Precinct station as per police directives, where the group was informed, “You are under arrest.” Three of the Christians, all men, were cited and face a trial date of October 31st.
McCauley-Bohn came to Christ in October of last year because of the outreach of RAVEN Ministries, the team that she now is a part of. She was adopted by the group’s pastor, Troy Bohn, and his wife Melanie. McCauley-Bohn had previously been working at a strip club on Bourbon Street.
While the Aggressive Solicitation ordinance used against McCauley-Bohn and the five others was crafted primarily to restrict panhandling and other forms of begging, it also includes a sentence that prohibits any type of free speech on Bourbon Street after sunset.
“It shall be prohibited for any person or group of persons to loiter or congregate on Bourbon Street for the purpose disseminating any social, political, or religious message between the hours of sunset and sunrise,” the law declares.
“Because only messages of a social, political or religious perspective are restricted, the section imposes a particularly egregious [First Amendment] restriction,” the complaint filed by the ACLU stated. “[Members of RAVEN Ministries] preach a message of love and salvation. They typically display a large cross, and wear t-shirts saying things like ‘I Love Jesus’ and ‘Ask Me How Jesus Changed My Life.’ They ask people if they are familiar with the Gospel, and invite conversation; however they do not harass, follow, or make physical contact with passersby.”
District Judge Eldon Fallon, who was appointed to the bench by Bill Clinton in 1995, ruled this afternoon that the ordinance was likely causing “irreparable injury” to the constitutional rights of citizens.
“The Court finds that continued enforcement of New Orleans [Aggressive Solicitation] ordinance will result in an infringement of Plaintiff’s rights of free speech, and that the Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success that this infringement is impermissible under the United States Constitution,” Fallon wrote. “It is ordered adjudged and decreed that Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order is hereby granted, and Defendants the City of New Orleans, Mayor Mitch Landrieu and NOPD Superintendent Renal Serpas, and their respective agents or employees, are hereby enjoined from enforcing or attempting to enforce [the] New Orleans Parish Ordinance.”
Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) filed a lawsuit yesterday on behalf of another evangelist, Pastor Paul Gros, who was threatened with arrest in May of this year while preaching on Bourbon Street with his wife, another pastor and a friend. ADF was seeking a preliminary injunction against the ordinance.
Until recently, The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) had been assisting David Johnson, another Christian who regularly ministers on Bourbon Street. Johnson had been surrounded by mounted police officers during last month’s Southern Decadence Festival, a popular homosexual pride event, and was forced off the street under threat of arrest.
Following the incident, the ACLJ sent a 7-page demand letter on September 6th to the City of New Orleans, urging the city to cease and desist its threats against those who wish to engage in free speech activities after sunset. Earlier this week, the organization informed Johnson that it could not proceed with further legal action, in part because of a lack of resources.
Michael Marcavage of the national evangelistic organization Repent America, who called upon the Department of Justice this week to intervene in the matter, says that he is thankful that the injunction has been granted.
“Christians have done much to help New Orleans following the hurricane devastation that it suffered, from monetary aid to charitable work, yet the silencing of Christian speech is the thanks they get in return?” he asked. “I commend Judge Fallon for issuing the injunction, as from his ruling it is evident that he understood the severity of the situation.”
Marcavage also noted concerns over the lack of response from Christian legal groups, which did not seek an emergency injunction prior to the arrests of the Christians.
“Considering the blatant unconstitutionality of this ordinance, I was disappointed to learn that a Christian legal group did not step up sooner and seek emergency relief. The case is a slam dunk, and while I am grateful that somebody did something, the ACLU now stands to make thousands in legal fees to further unGodliness in our land,” he said. “I am thankful, however, for Christian attorneys who are working to defend freedom and those who face persecution, and am praying that God would raise up more believers who zealously desire to see Him glorified in the public square.”
The temporary restraining order remains in place until the court decides further on whether to grant a preliminary injunction. The next hearing is set for October 1st.
Newsday blasts two-party system, presidential debate commission as massive fraud
Photo credit: AP | Former two-term governor of New Mexico and
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson speaks at Duke University, in Durham N.C. (Sept. 20, 2012)
As the presidential election approaches, the emails in my in-box can be divided into three basically equal categories:
1) "I canot beleeve you have fallin for Obologna's trix."
2) "How cum U cant see thru Mitwit Romney's dum republikkan dumness. "
3) "Have you heard how Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party candidate for president, is getting rolled?"
The first two categories I answer quickly and politely, because they are mostly from family. The Gary Johnson stuff I've just been chewing on, though, and getting disgusted.
We are a two-party system -- not by law, but because the Democrats and the Republicans have seized the mechanisms of government. They use their control to maintain power, and other parties can't compete. This causes a bunch of self-perpetuating, corrosive behaviors, like government-funded primaries for these major parties, which are really nothing but private organizations. Withholding the money for a Republican primary out of a libertarian's paycheck makes as much sense as taxing Jews to pay for KKK dance parties (now that's an idea for a reality show).
Another, more pressing way the Republicans and Democrats control the process came about in the late 1980s when the two major parties created the "nonpartisan" Commission on Presidential Debates, and crowded out the League of Women Voters, which had run the general election debates up until then.
In 1988, the League withdrew, saying in a statement that "the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter." The League was right. The debates have largely been unfair and prepackaged since then, and the Commission on Presidential Debates is currently run by a former head of the Republican National Committee and a former White House press secretary (under Bill Clinton). And no one from any other party need apply.
We now have an estimated 90 million "unlikely voters." These are citizens eligible to cast a ballot, who likely won't bother.
They say their vote won't matter, that there's nothing worth voting for. Interestingly, about 20 percent say they would vote for a third-party candidate if they did bother to cast a ballot, and 53 percent say third-parties are needed.
In a phone interview, Johnson, the former New Mexico governor who's heading the Libertarian Party ticket, told a miserable tale. He tried to run for president as a Republican this time, and was barred from most of the debates, even though, he says, he had the 4 percent support in a national poll needed to qualify "How would you feel about that," he asked, a bit plaintively. "What if it were you?"
Then he accepted the Libertarian Party nomination, and he can't get a lectern in the three general election debates, where the requirement is 15 percent support in a major poll. He's suing the Commission on Presidential Debates, but is unlikely to win in court. Regardless, he believes he's polling at 6 percent nationally -- and higher in many states -- and what he draws could decide the race in a few of them, Ralph Nader-2000 style.
Few would want every lunatic who says he's running for president on the stage. But it would be good to have more debates, and to hear from more than the two big brands. What if every candidate on the ballot in at least half the states got to participate in a debate or two, and standards toughened for later forums.
It feels like "the establishment" -- the corporations and power players -- don't care which of the two major candidates wins. They just want to be sure a Ron Paul, a Gary Johnson, a Dennis Kucinich and a Ralph Nader can't win, or, really, that their often unconventional ideas can't be heard. And until enough people make noise about it, inside the voting booth and out, it won't change.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)