ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

The Cowboy Byte

Today's Featured Article:
Surprise! Romney Visits Solyndra Plant

Today's Cowboy Headlines:
Headlines you might have missed:  
on No comments:

Jerome Corsi and NY Gov David Paterson Discuss Obama's Eligibility - 5/3...

on No comments:

Breaking News from Western Journalism

May 31, 2012 02:33 pm | Doug Book
“We want to let them know that there is a theological responsibility (emphasis added) to participate in the political process…” said House Congressional Black Caucus chair, Emanuel Cleaver of a meeting with hundreds of black Pastors representing various denominations in the U.S.… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 02:27 pm | Dan Johnson
When 4th District Court Judge Katherine Forrest ruled the NDAA unconstitutional, there was wide rejoicing across the internet. Posts from prominent civil liberties activists like journalist David Seaman rang out with “VIICCTOOORRYY!” A Russia Today newscast, titled the ruling “NDAA… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 02:23 pm | Daniel Noe


May 31, 2012 02:18 pm | Cagle Cartoons
May 31, 2012 02:14 pm | Daniel Noe


May 31, 2012 02:08 pm | Alan P. Halbert
The latest action by the state of Hawaii in the continuing saga of Barack Obama and his constant evolutionary metamorphosis leaves him a truly transformational figure, as the rest of us mere mortals are simply born, whereas he evolves.  When… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 02:07 pm | Michael Reagan
President Obama and his wife, the health nanny in chief, obviously don’t know when they’ve gone too far in their crusade to socialize and Obamatize America. They couldn’t stop pushing for the Obamacare mandate that would force religious organizations to… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 01:58 pm | Daniel Noe
The results of our latest Western Journalism poll show that more than half of our readers think that Allen West should be Mitt Romney’s choice for the VP nod. 18% think that Romney should pick Marco Rubio instead. Take a… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 01:52 pm | Breaking News
Attorney General Eric Holder spoke to a gathering of black church leaders on Wednesday in Washington, D.C., where he told them that voting is a “sacred” right. Where’s the ACLU? Americans United for Separation of Church and State? Sounds like… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 01:51 pm | Daniel Noe

Holder Fast Furious

May 31, 2012 01:43 pm | Breaking News
On a day that Barack Obama was giving the Presidential Medal of Freedom to a socialist, Dolores Huerta, who has praised Hugo Chavez; and just days after left-wing activist Al Sharpton was comparing Republicans to Hitler, the media were consumed… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 01:30 pm | Daniel Noe


May 31, 2012 01:21 pm | Breaking News
Politico reports: A one-sentence bill worth $300 million to a bank owned by a politically connected family that has doled out hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign donations is about to get a big push forward. Set to be… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 01:15 pm | Breaking News
The White House is warning that President Barack Obama will veto a widely popular House spending bill for veterans’ programs and construction projects at military bases. The veto promise comes because House GOP leaders are breaking faith with last summer’s… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 01:09 pm | Breaking News
MADISON, Wis., May 31 (UPI) — A win for Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker in next week’s recall election would mean “lights out” for President Obama, the National Republican Committee head said. “Certainly [if] Wisconsin goes red, I think it’s lights… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 01:08 pm | Breaking News
Legislation coming up for a House vote would make it a federal crime to carry out an abortion based on the gender of the fetus. The measure takes aim at the aborting of female fetuses, a practice more common to… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 12:59 pm | Breaking News
(Reuters) – Finally, there is definitive proof: The presidential candidate was born in the United States, and his father was not. Yes, Republican Mitt Romney appears eligible to be president, according to a copy of Romney’s birth certificate released to… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 12:36 pm | Daniel Noe


May 31, 2012 11:53 am | Cagle Cartoons
May 31, 2012 11:43 am | Paul G. Kengor
I was recently contacted by Ben Johnson of LifeSiteNews, who told me of a fascinating development. He informed me of a curious fan of President Obama’s advocacy of gay marriage: Mariela Castro, niece of ailing and aging Cuban tyrant, Fidel Castro,… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 11:25 am | Ron Reale
I’m watching Fox News Sunday this Memorial Day listening to the great “Progressive” icon of the right, Senator John McCain, whine about the failure of America to protect some Middle East terrorists from other Middle East terrorists in Syria. Following… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 11:19 am | Breaking News
HATTIESBURG, MS – Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant has told a group of teenagers that he believes it should be possible for public schools to have some sort of nondenominational prayer to open the day. However, the Republican said he’s not… Continue to Post

May 31, 2012 08:52 am | Cagle Cartoons
on No comments:

Ron Paul, The Anti Christ and the Beast


Today's show I will offer an apology of sorts to Ron Paul supporters. I will also be covering the anti christ, the BEAST system and the police state and show how ignorant some of us really are.
on No comments:

Pastor Sentenced to Prison Over Bible Verse!

on No comments:

Eric Holder Wants One Law for Whites and Another for ‘Non-Whites’

by

Voter IDAttorney General Eric Holder spoke to a gathering of black church leaders on Wednesday in Washington, D.C., where he told them that voting is a “sacred” right. Where’s the ACLU? Americans United for Separation of Church and State? Sounds like “theocracy” and “dominionism” to me. Where’s Michelle Goldberg? Wasn’t the Attorney General trampling on the First Amendment by mixing religion and politics?
The whole separation of church and state thing is a one way street. It’s only OK for liberals to make appearances before church leaders and speak about a “sacred” right.
It’s too bad that conservative church leaders are intimidated by the claims of liberals and organizations like the ACLU and Americans United. It’s more likely, however, that pastors use the “separation of church and state” myth as an excuse not to speak on political issues, thereby giving liberals free reign to recruit among religious adherents with no blowback from groups the ACLU and Americans United.
Liberal hypocrisy is so rampant that no one is surprised by it anymore. So instead of harping on it in this article, I want to address some of Eric Holder’s legal and logical absurdities that he spoke about in his address to the participants at the Conference of National Black Churches:
“The recent wave of changes to state-level voter identification laws also has presented a number of problems requiring the department’s attention. In December [of 2011], we objected to South Carolina’s voter ID law, after finding — based on the state’s own data — that the proposed change would place an unfair burden on non-white voters.”
Does the requirement to show an ID put an unfair burden on “non-whites” who cash checks, purchase alcohol, or buy cigarettes? Are only “non-whites” economically disadvantaged? Sounds like racial stereotyping.
Is there an unfair burden on “non-whites” who want to purchase a drug like Mucinex? The non-prescription drug loosens the mucus that causes chest and nasal congestion. Since it contains chemicals used that can be used to make crack, Mucinex purchasers have to show ID to purchase the product.
Is Eric Holder saying that the ID requirement in the above examples should be set aside for “non-whites”? Does this mean that a bank would have to cash a check for a “non-white” person without having to require an ID? Can we assume that only “non-whites” will have to show IDs in the future? Can anyone say “reverse discrimination”?
Did Eric Holder have to show his law license in order to practice law? Apparently not.
on No comments:

Heartless Mitt Romney Sneers at Dying Medical Marijuana Patient

on No comments:

The Possibility of a Ron Paul Third-Party Run for President

 
Recently by Scott Lazarowitz: The Bureaucratic Berlin Wall in Amerika

We are certainly at a crossroads in America, with Election 2012. The political ruling class has usurped many of our rights away, and stolen much of the private wealth and capital that had provided jobs and opportunities and had raised the standard of living more than in any other society.
But the farce that these elections continue to be merely reinforces my point that such elections are mere rearranging of deck chairs.
The Ron Paul people have been following the rules at the state conventions and winning delegates to go to the national convention, while, apparently, the Romney people have been allegedly engaging in cheating and dirty tricks, the latest of which has been in my dreaded state, the People’s Republic of Massachusetts.
But why Ron Paul is trying to get the nomination of a party that has been a socialist-neocon-central planning party for 150 years, I’ll never know.
The convention will be a Romney-coronation police state nightmare, especially for those who are there on behalf of Paul.
As Lew Rockwell advised, it may even be a good idea that the Ron Paul delegates not even attend the convention, for their own safety.
My prediction is that Ron Paul’s delegates will not be treated well there, and there will most certainly be agents provocateurs trying to provoke some kind of disruption that would then be blamed on Ron Paul.
And if the nominating process actually does go to a second ballot in which Ron Paul delegates then give Romney a real challenge, the Ron Paul people will be accused of cheating, as though they didn’t legitimately win their delegate status.
But is all this worth it, especially given how within the national Republican Party many people are still hostile to Ron Paul’s message of freedom, personal responsibility, and peace?
That is why I still believe that Ron Paul should run as a third party candidate.
Unfortunately, those delusional anti-Obama conservatives – the ones who keep saying how important it is that we oust Obama, and that we all must get behind Romney – do not understand that they want to get behind a socialist, mealy-mouthed politician who is really no different from Obama, except for the rhetoric, which means nothing in the real world.
And then there are those people who think that a Ron Paul third-party run would harm Rand Paul’s chances in 2016, if he were to run for President at that time. "Yech," is what I have to say to that. And the reason for that is that electing any one of the current statists who support the status quo now will just be a further kicking the can down the road which will definitely lead to the economic collapse, civil unrest, martial law and chaos that trend forecasters such as Gerald Celente have been predicting for a while.
What really got me was this interview that was going viral, in which Rand Paul defended Romney’s record at Bain Capital, but was erroneously being labeled as an "endorsement" of Romney. Most of the comments on that post show that many people in the liberty movement are still supportive of Ron Paul, would never vote for Willard Romney under any circumstances, and believe that a Rand Paul endorsement of Willard (or worse, a Rand Paul VP nomination with Willard) would be a total sell-out.
The truth is, the real Romney is not a "capitalist." He is a socialist. And it is that Romney-Obama socialism and central planning that have been destroying America for a century.
But in their irrational cognitive dissonance and fear and panic of an Obama reelection, the "conservatives" say we must in solidarity all get behind the socialist Romney in November. But who is it exactly that the hysterical ones are supporting?
Delusional Republicans and conservatives nationwide who are all getting behind Romney in November means this: They would be getting behind
Now, is Rand Paul really sure that he wants to get behind that kind of candidate in the 2012 presidential election?
Ron Paul is none of those things.
But, most of all – and this is where Rand Paul is wrong in that aforementioned interview – Willard Romney is no "capitalist." No real capitalist would impose insurance mandates on people by the force of law.
No real capitalist would implement a health insurance bureaucracy called the "Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority." Or even consider "carbon taxes," and so on and so on.
Dr. Paul is the true capitalist in his support of truly free markets, private property, and the sanctity of voluntary contracts under the rule of law.
Remember now, the zombie Republican Convention Romney fanatics – part of the real "Tinfoil Hat" crowd – the ones who will be attempting to shut out the Ron Paul delegates, will be supporting one of the most socialist Republican candidates in a long time.
One big difference between Obama-Romney and Ron Paul: When the economy does collapse and there is civil unrest, both Obama and Romney will impose a treasonous, civil liberties-crushing, due process-free federal martial law, but Ron Paul will not do that.
Instead of the Obama-Romney unconstitutional, un-American martial law, Ron Paul would (at least I think he would) restore to the people their God-given right to protect themselves form aggressors, from burglars, looters, rioters, muggers, thieves, rapists and other violent criminals.
Imposing martial law against the American people would pose even more of a threat against our security than rioters and thieves themselves, by unleashing an already out-of-control government-security complex and military onto innocent civilians.
The military has long been the Presidents’ personal army, just as the American Founders feared.
In a society of true common sense and the preservation of freedom, the civilians would be armed, and the employees of government would not. Threats from foreigners would be met with immediate resistance from an armed, vigilant public.
Statist Presidents such as the two Bushes, Clinton and Obama and their minions have been making that go the other way to the point of the current tyranny we have today, with their disarming of the American people, and their starting of wars of aggression and provoking of foreigners to make us less safe, their spreading the military across the globe and weakening our actual security.
Romney would continue that path toward greater weakness by way of the neocons’ delusional hegemonic fantasies.
Now, if Ron Paul does not get the Republican nomination for President at the convention, then, as Justin Raimondo has suggested, Paul really ought to run as a third party candidate, either as an Independent, or perhaps Gary Johnson could step aside and let Dr. Paul run as the Libertarian Party candidate.
However, as prominent voluntaryist Carl Watner has stated, attempting to restore freedom via the political electoral process is futile, as the use of the State’s own apparatus of institutionalized aggression ends up serving the State’s own ends. You cannot force people to be free.
Which is not to say that we can’t elect Ron Paul who would at least dismantle immediately some of the federal government’s most egregious grasps on our persons and property.
You see, unlike the current and past socialists and statists who have ruined America, and who promise further ruination, Ron Paul doesn’t want to use the political system to implement some political agenda or program. Unlike those other politicians who want these political offices because they crave power and control over others, Ron Paul just wants us to have our freedom.
No, Dr. Paul wants to be elected to the presidency to dismantle the unconstitutional extensions of the President’s executive power that Obama and previous Presidents have given themselves without the approval of the people’s representatives in Congress, Paul would fire all the czars, and repeal many of the federal government’s intrusions and encroachments into our lives and liberty.
Now, some people are worried that a Ron Paul third-party run would harm Rand Paul’s political future, Rand’s potential for a 2016 presidential run. First, America can’t wait that long for a restoration of our freedom. And also, honest people ought not be concerned with political career-planning.
Ultimately, what Americans need to do is engage in mass non-violent resistance. They need to withdraw their consent of all the economy-destroying, liberty-crushing socialist policies that these bureaucrat imbeciles have imposed on us.
As Carl Watner pointed out,
The goal of voluntaryist resistance is to abolish the political power structure and its success or failure in obtaining that objective rests squarely on the degree to which its strategy succeeds in delegitimizing the State and in inducing people to withdraw their support from the government. Its major strategies rest on education (which heightens public awareness of the evils of the State) and in persuading large numbers of persons to refuse to cooperate with the government … Voluntaryists must structure the conflict situation with the government in such a manner that the government becomes responsible for the resulting actions. Mass non-cooperation and widespread civil disobedience present a "resist or abdicate" dilemma to the government. In resisting voluntaryist demands, the government becomes responsible for its own repressive acts. In abdicating, the government not only loses face but political power.
May 31, 2012
Scott Lazarowitz [send him mail] is a commentator and cartoonist, visit his blog.
Copyright © 2012 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

on No comments:

The Sabbath Day: The Sabbath Day

The Sabbath Day: The Sabbath Day: Exodus 20: 8 - 11 says Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. Why has most of the world forgotten the Sabbath day. The day and the commandment that God SPECIFICALLY says to remember?. This website is dedicated to showing both sabbath day keepers and non sabbath day keepers, the importance of the Lords Sabbath. Watch this INCREDIBLE video about the Sabbath day and learn how The Sabbath Day is more important than ever!.

on No comments:

Ron Paul Endorsed by South Dakota State Rep. Brian Liss

Sioux Falls conservative declares, “Ron Paul will reign in fiscal irresponsibility and reestablish constitutional government.”

LAKE JACKSON, Texas – 2012 Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul was endorsed today by South Dakota State Representative Brian Liss (R-Sioux Falls). Rep. Liss represents the Mount Rushmore State’s 13th House District. The area comprises Minnehaha County including Sioux Falls, the state’s largest city. In making public his endorsement, Rep. Liss is doing so as a private citizen and not on behalf of any entity with which he is affiliated.
“It makes no sense for my fellow South Dakotans to send unvigilant, liberal Republican delegates to the party’s national convention in Tampa. Ron Paul’s delegates understand liberty, and Dr. Paul himself fully understands and appreciates federalism,” said Rep. Liss.
“Ron Paul will reign in fiscal irresponsibility and reestablish constitutional government,” he added.
Rep. Liss personifies the new energy and enthusiasm that will benefit the Republican Party if a welcoming environment persists, as many hope it will. Liss first ran for office as a Libertarian candidate for Lt. Governor in South Dakota in 1994 and in 2006 ran for state representative as an independent candidate. He won office for the first time in 2010 running as a Republican for the House in District 13, and has aided many Republican candidates in various capacities.
on No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)