ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Pennsylvania: Who in York County is giving money to presidential candidates?

(York, Pennsylvania) Here is the latest list of contributions from York County residents to presidential campaigns, as compiled by the Federal Election Commission.
The numbers are as of May 20, the most recent reporting date for campaigns, and covers contributions through April 30.
Type a name or municipality into the field to filter search results.
Results will include all five categories, no matter which field you searched for.
If you type a number into the "amount" field, your search will return contributions of that amount or more.
In the results table, you can click on category names at the top of the columns to sort them. For example, if you search for contributions from Red Lion, you can click on "contribution" to see the results from highest to lowest or lowest to highest.

According to records:

Ron Paul received 257 donations from York County Residents.

Mitt Romney received 68 donations York County Residents.


Results Search Page:
http://www.ydr.com/politics/ci_20239609/who-york-county-is-giving-money-presidential-candidates?source=most_viewed

Obama May Be In Deep Trouble…with Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court



According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable.


Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama’s major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, ‘That’s not true,’ when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court’s ruling. As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until ‘Obama is gone.’ Apparently, the Court has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can ‘opt out.’
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court. Frankly, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona. That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling–that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

TV Networks Say You're Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials

By Mitch Stoltz
 
HomeTelevision networks are having a busy month trying to stamp out new TV-watching technology, including telling a court that skipping a commercial while watching a recorded show is illegal. Yesterday, Fox, NBC, and CBS all sued Dish Network over its digital video recorder with automatic commercial-skipping. The same networks, plus ABC, Univision, and PBS, are gearing up for a May 30 hearing in their cases against Aereo, a New York startup bringing local broadcast TV to the Internet.  EFF and Public Knowledge filed an amicus brief supporting Aereo this week.
The suits against Dish are a response to the "Hopper" DVR and its "Auto Hop" feature, which automatically skips over commercials. According to the networks' complaints, the Hopper automatically records eight days' worth of prime time programming on the four major networks that subscribers can play back on request. Beginning a few hours after the broadcast, viewers can choose to watch a program sans ads.
These suits are yet another in a long and ignominious series of lawsuits by content owners seeking to control the features of personal electronic devices, and to capture for themselves the value of new technologies no matter who invents them. We've seen this movie before. Most directly, the Dish suits look like a replay of the 2002 suit against DVR maker ReplayTV.  The networks sued ReplayTV for copyright infringement based on another automated commercial-skip feature.  They claimed that viewers were infringing copyright when they skipped ads during playback, that skipping "robs the advertisers," and that ReplayTV should be responsible.  EFF argued then, and in a later suit on behalf of Replay's customers, that choosing not to watch ads during playback is pretty far from being a violation of federal law. Unfortunately, the cost of the suit drove ReplayTV out of business before the court could rule on the networks' wacky theory.
Fast forward ten years.  The networks are accusing Dish of "inducing" copyright infringement. That's a legal theory first created in the record labels' case against peer-to-peer software maker Grokster.  The problem for the networks is that a technology maker, service, or other middleman can't be held liable for inducing copyright infringement unless their customers are actually infringing. And that means the networks will have to convince a judge that people who record a TV show, and later decide to skip over the commercials during playback, are violating federal law.
Dish is fighting back hard, filing its own lawsuit in New York to have its devices ruled legal. Hopefully, the courts won't turn millions of American commercial-skippers into lawbreakers.

COMING ATTACK ON AMERICA STARTED NDAA Military Plans (make Viral)

Breaking News from Western Journalism

May 26, 2012 02:48 pm | Doug Book
According to Congressman Darrell Issa, there are some 80,000 pages of information now in the possession of the D.O.J. Inspector General as she continues to feign an official investigation into the Fast and Furious-related activities of her longtime friend, Eric… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 02:32 pm | Daniel Noe



May 26, 2012 02:28 pm | Tim Bryce
Last month, I had mixed emotions as I watched the flight of the “Discovery” space shuttle orbiter on television as it was being retired to the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, D.C. On the one hand, I was proud of our… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 02:20 pm | Michael J. Nellett
If you watch the news either on TV or the internet, you have probably heard of the lastest fiasco for the Obama Administration. A little background first. Years ago, The Navy Seals were NEVER mentioned by the government, news organizations,… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 02:15 pm | Tim Bryce
- with apologies to Hans Christian Andersen. (Click for AUDIO VERSION) Many years ago, there was a President so exceedingly fond of hyperbole that he spent all his money on political spin. He cared nothing about preparing a balanced budget… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 02:08 pm | Kris Zane

0123


May 26, 2012 02:07 pm | Cagle Cartoons

May 26, 2012 02:01 pm | Tim Powers
For those of us who are watching the decline of America, one thing stands out regarding society today. American values are quickly disappearing. Our once great, proud nation is being reduced to a “give me ” society. My parents as… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 01:48 pm | Daniel Noe



May 26, 2012 01:46 pm | Breaking News
In two campaign speeches over the last two days, President Barack Obama has twice mistakenly mentioned “my sons” when defending his administration’s regulation requiring virtually all health-care plans in the United States to provide women, without any fees or co-pay,… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 01:37 pm | Michael J. Nellett
I was watching “The Five” on Fox News, and Bob Beckel went on one of his usual rants about the economic playing field in America not being level. President Obama echoes the same thing as does every progressive in the… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 01:34 pm | Breaking News
“Hawaii duped Arizona” in its response to Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett’s request to verify Barack Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 election, charges the lead investigator of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse. “We have developed incontrovertible… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 01:17 pm | Donn Dears
(Editor’s Note: See Part 1 here.) CO2 emissions from gasoline used in our cars accounts for approximately 20% of all CO2 emissions. CO2 emissions from gasoline Population is forecast to increase to around 420 million by 2050, which is approximately… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 01:13 pm | Daniel Noe



May 26, 2012 12:42 pm | Breaking News
It was big news when President Clinton said he “never inhaled.” People laughed at the absurdity of the statement. Everybody knew he inhaled. His denial was done with a wink and a nod. I suspect that a lot of you… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 12:41 pm | Breaking News
A month before the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of Obamacare, liberal supporters are already planning an aggressive propaganda campaign to sway media coverage and public opinion. The focus of the liberal public-relations campaign will be… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 12:36 pm | Daniel Noe



May 26, 2012 12:22 pm | Tom Pauken
This Memorial Day, many Americans will hit the lake, light up the grill, or take a family drive to enjoy the good life so many of our soldiers have fought for and died to preserve. This year, however, thousands from… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 10:50 am | Phil Glass
Dear Americans, Ronald Reagan understood that the Constitution given us by our Founders was one that trusted the people to govern themselves. In his First Inaugural Address, Reagan said this: From time to time, we have been tempted to believe… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 10:15 am | Tim Powers
I am sure that millions of families in this great Republic of ours have someone in thier family tree who have fought and died in service to the United States of America. As our younger generations are now consumed with… Continue to Post


May 26, 2012 09:51 am | Cagle Cartoons

May 25, 2012 05:53 pm | Cagle Cartoons

May 25, 2012 05:51 pm | Cagle Cartoons

Obama’s Army Wants Militarized American Streets

Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post
Thanks to Posse Comitatus, the US military are forbidden from responding on the streets of America whenever the whim is announced.
The Posse Comitatus Act, Section 1385, states that only under “circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress” can a military presence on American streets be permitted.
Yet, if Obama‘s Defense Department has their way, a new authorization act will give them the power to order the armed forces to be used against the American public.
Air Force reservists are slated to be the new response team for domestic disturbances. Disseminated from Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) and other reserve agencies, these men and women could be called to be first responders to natural disasters within the United States. The legislation would extend mobilizations for indeterminate periods of time.
The AFRC affirms that reservists are traditionally not used in “homeland disaster response”. The governors of individual states can request the National Guard’s assistance during a natural disaster when local law enforcement becomes overwhelmed.
Our reservists have been asked and often volunteer to assist after disasters hit the homeland,” said Lt. Gen. Charles E. Stenner Jr., chief of Air Force Reserve and AFRC commander. “Mobilizing needed reservists will help sustain their support for longer periods and make operations more efficient. We mobilize reservists to handle contingencies overseas, so it makes sense that we do that to take care of our own country.”
Because of the specialized training that reservists are given in dealing with disasters, the US government has decided they would be perfect as a first response team.
Earlier this month, in Crookston, Minnesota, there were armed US National Guardsmen that were patrolling a residential neighborhood .
These functions are called “urban operations training” where military personnel carry armed weapons with the command not to “utilize armory or pyrotechnics”.
Within the Air Force Reserve, there are other specialized units such as response personnel, supplies and equipment focused on disaster scenarios.
As recent as 2008 saw our National Guard unit in America under NORTHCOM as “domestic security”.
Stenner proclaims that this new authority will allow the armed forces to make greater contributions to Americans should there be a natural disaster. He is referring to the frustration chiefs of reservists experience because they are “unable to help their communities.”
The push for over-reaching authority allocated to the armed forces will negate local reservists’ purpose by Title 10, which gives them federal power that supersedes state authority in Title 32.
Armed Forces chiefs claim that there were reserve-component Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines who were close at hand with the capabilities needed, but they didn’t have the authority to act,” said Army Lt. Gen. Jack C. Stultz, chief of Army Reserve. “Finally, we got the law changed. This new legislation says that now we can use Title 10 reserves.”
Without a declaration of emergency or disaster from the President, these armed forces could not act. With this new ability, they can . . . whenever and for whatever purpose they are ordered to.
The law specifies that local law enforcement is still mandated to provide initial response; yet if needed, the National Guard will become the first step requested by a state governor.
And then there is the matter of a scenario that allows reservists to be deployed for a promised 120 days, which could be extended based upon request. “We just have to make sure we have the procedures and processes worked out,” Stultz remarked about the specifics that are now being worked out to avoid confusion of authority later on.
Stultz is very anxious to have this power at his fingertips. “Let’s not wait until a hurricane hits to say, ‘How do we do it?’” These reservists are going to be the response team for any future (and assured) “overseas contingencies”.
As operations in the Middle East are winding down, Stultz can now refocus his attention on militarizing America.
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page .

Public Advocate has won another victory for marriage!

Public
Advocate Banner


Public Advocate has won another victory for marriage!

Republican New York state senator James Alesi, who betrayed the Family last summer by voting for homosexual “marriage,” has announced he is conceding his political seat.

Public Advocate supporters sent countless emails and newsletters exposing Alesi’s role in this betrayal -- and it has paid off!

Alesi admitted that his vote against marriage was the factor that cost him the support of his constituents.

Thank you for all your help in this battle.

It is vital that we hold politicians accountable for voting against true marriage and family values.

It is up to you and me to show them morality is not optional.

For the Family,


Eugene Delgaudio
President, Public Advocate of the United States


P.S. Please help Public Advocate keep these programs running by chipping in with a donation of $5 or more.

The Conservative Byte

Today's Featured Article: User’s Guide To Smoking Pot With Barack Obama

Today's Politically Incorrect Laugh:
Memorial Day

Today's Politically Incorrect Headlines:

Black Female Obamites Are Emotional Train Wrecks

Revealed: Hundreds of words to avoid using online if you don't want the government spying on you (and they include 'pork', 'cloud' and 'Mexico')


  • Department of Homeland Security forced to release list following freedom of information request
  • Agency insists it only looks for evidence of genuine threats to the U.S. and not for signs of general dissent
By Daniel Miller

Revealing: A list of keywords used by government analysts to scour the internet for evidence of threats to the U.S. has been released under the Freedom of Information Act Revealing: A list of keywords used by government analysts to scour the internet for evidence of threats to the U.S. has been released under the Freedom of Information Act
The Department of Homeland Security has been forced to release a list of keywords and phrases it uses to monitor social networking sites and online media for signs of terrorist or other threats against the U.S.
The intriguing the list includes obvious choices such as 'attack', 'Al Qaeda', 'terrorism' and 'dirty bomb' alongside dozens of seemingly innocent words like 'pork', 'cloud', 'team' and 'Mexico'.
Released under a freedom of information request, the information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats.
The words are included in the department's 2011 'Analyst's Desktop Binder' used by workers at their National Operations Center which instructs workers to identify 'media reports that reflect adversely on DHS and response activities'.
Department chiefs were forced to release the manual following a House hearing over documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit which revealed how analysts monitor social networks and media organisations for comments that 'reflect adversely' on the government.
However they insisted the practice was aimed not at policing the internet for disparaging remarks about the government and signs of general dissent, but to provide awareness of any potential threats.
As well as terrorism, analysts are instructed to search for evidence of unfolding natural disasters, public health threats and serious crimes such as mall/school shootings, major drug busts, illegal immigrant busts.
The list has been posted online by the Electronic Privacy Information Center - a privacy watchdog group who filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act before suing to obtain the release of the documents.
In a letter to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Counter-terrorism and Intelligence, the centre described the choice of words as 'broad, vague and ambiguous'.
Scroll down for full list
Threat detection: Released under a freedom of information request, the information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats
Threat detection: Released under a freedom of information request, the information sheds new light on how government analysts are instructed to patrol the internet searching for domestic and external threats
They point out that it includes 'vast amounts of First Amendment protected speech that is entirely unrelated to the Department of Homeland Security mission to protect the public against terrorism and disasters.'
A senior Homeland Security official told the Huffington Post that the manual 'is a starting point, not the endgame' in maintaining situational awareness of natural and man-made threats and denied that the government was monitoring signs of dissent.
However the agency admitted that the language used was vague and in need of updating.
Spokesman Matthew Chandler told website: 'To ensure clarity, as part of ... routine compliance review, DHS will review the language contained in all materials to clearly and accurately convey the parameters and intention of the program.'


MIND YOUR LANGUAGE: THE LIST OF KEYWORDS IN FULL

 List1
List
list3