You can almost hear the collective gasp from Ron Paul's loyal band of supporters.
Speaking
Monday at a town hall style-meeting event in Cleveland, presumptive GOP
presidential Mitt Romney plunged a fork into the idea that he could
come around to embracing Mr. Paul's call for deep cuts in federal
spending.
"My job is to get America back on track to have a
balanced budget. Now I'm not going to cut $1 trillion in the first
year," he said, distancing himself from Mr. Paul's (http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2011/oct/19/paul-time-cut-spending/) plan to slice more than a quarter of the estimated $3.8 trillion being spent by the the federal government.
Why not, someone in the crowd apparently asked, sparking a response from the former Massachusetts governor.
"The
reason," he explained, "is taking a trillion dollars out of a $15
trillion economy would cause our economy to shrink [and] would put a lot
of people out of work."
Mr. Paul proposed deeper cuts in federal
spending than any of his rivals in the GOP nomination contest, rolling
out a plan in October that called for $1 trillion in spending cuts
during his year in office -- in part by closing federal agencies,
attrition in the federal work force and ending the wars overseas.
"I
think the easiest place to cut spending is overseas," Mr. Paul said at
the time, reminding supporters that the nation has spent trillions in
Iraq and Afghanistan. "It doesn’t make us safer. It doesn’t make us
richer. It makes us poorer."
Mr. Romney has offered a much
different fiscal vision, arguing that federal spending should be cut and
spending capped at about 20 percent of GDP. It now stands at about 25
percent of GDP. He's also railed against proposed cuts to military
spending, which accounts for more than 18 percent of national spending.
Speaking
at a campaign stop last week in Portsmouth, Va., Mr. Romney said he
will add new ships to the U.S. Navy, add new aircraft to the Air Force
and add 100,000 active duty personnel.
ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT
WND EXCLUSIVE Now a witness to Breitbart's death vanishes
Follows suspicious demise of member of coroner's team
by Jerome R. Corsi
A private investigator has been unable to find the only eyewitness to the sudden death of media innovator and conservative activist Andrew Breitbart.The apparent disappearance of Christopher Lasseter, who says he saw Breitbart drop to the sidewalk in front of a restaurant, adds to the mystery surrounding Breitbart’s March 1 death.
On the day the Los Angeles County coroner released Breitbart’s autopsy report, a photographic technician at the corner’s office died suddenly of suspicious causes.
In addition, at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., just three weeks before Breitbart’s death – where he promised to unveil “damning” new video evidence of Barack Obama’s radical past that would change the election – Breitbart gave WND details of his upcoming revelations.
He claimed to WND that he had a video showing radical Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers and Barack Obama at Harvard planning revolution in the United States. But the video, aired just after he died, was of Obama introducing a radical Harvard professor, and the general response was flat.
Filmmaker Steve Bannon, appointed executive chairman of the Breitbart News Network after Breitbart’s death, has insisted to WND that the media mogul died of natural causes and to suggest anything else is irresponsible.
“Breitbart had an enlarged heart,” Bannon told WND. “He had been hospitalized for the problem last year and told to lose weight that he did not lose.”
Bannon, formerly a Breitbart News Network board member, told WND that for months prior to his death, Breitbart had been working overtime to finalize a refinancing of his news agency.
“He died of natural causes,” Bannon said. “The family wants the matter put to rest, and WND is beginning to irritate me suspecting foul play.”
In addition to Bannon, Laurence Solov, formerly president and chief operating officer, was elevated after Breitbart’s death. Solov took Breitbart’s place as CEO.
An eyewitness disappears
After recruiting the assistance of private investigators, WND found that Lasseter, the 26-year-old witness who saw Breitbart drop dead, is no longer residing at his last known address in California.
At the request of WND, Ohio-based private investigator Susan Daniels recruited a California-based private investigator to find Lasseter. The local investigator tried without success to find a cell phone or landline phone number for Lasseter.
After determining that Lasseter lived with his parents, Thornton, age 64, and Elaine, age 56, at a Los Angeles address, the investigator visited the residence in-person to see if he could make contact.
During the visit, the investigator reported, no one picked up the phone when he dialed the Lasseter apartment number outside the building. But he was greeted by a voice recording that identified different people at the apartment by first name, with none of the names on the recording being Christopher, Thornton or Elaine.
The investigator concluded Christopher Lasseter had “hunkered down” in what seemed to be an attempt to avoid further questioning.
He was unsure Lasseter was still residing at the address and considered it possible that Lasseter had moved.
On March 1, Crime File News reported Lasseter was walking his dog in Brentwood, Calif., when he saw Breitbart cross the street from the Brentwood Restaurant.
Breitbart was walking without apparent distress when he stepped on the curb “and fell like a sack of potatoes,” Lasseter said.
He noted that Breitbart’s skin color was bright red, which is not typically associated with heart attack victims.
Paul Huebl, who writes for CrimeFileNews.com, reported April 22 that he interviewed Lasseter and added the detail that the witness was disturbed by Breitbart’s color.
As a former Army medical corpsman, Lasseter knew that most heart attack victims turned blue.
Coroner’s assistant dies
On April 20, Los Angeles County Chief Coroner Craig Harvey released the autopsy report on Breitbart, listing the cause of death as heart failure resulting from an enlarged heart and some heart disease.
Harvey noted no prescription or illegal drugs were detected and only a small amount of alcohol was found in Breitbart’s system at the time of death.
While the coroner concluded no foul play was suspected, his report made no attempt to explain why Lasseter observed Breitbart’s skin was “bright red” at time of his death.
Then, within hours of the release of Breitbart’s preliminary autopsy report, Michael Cormier, age 61, a forensic technician who worked as a photographer in the Los Angeles County coroner’s office, died suddenly from what is suspected to be arsenic poisoning.
“At this point we haven’t ruled out foul play,” Los Angeles Police Lt. Alan Hamilton told the Los Angeles Times, referring to Cormier’s sudden death. “It’s one of the thing being considered. We are waiting for the coroner’s results.”
A video about Derrick Bell airs
At CPAC Feb. 10, Breitbart told the influential audience of grass-roots supporters that he planned to do the vetting on Barack Obama that the mainstream media failed to do in 2008. He promised to begin releasing videos within a few weeks.
“The videos are going to come out; the narrative is going to come out that Barack Obama met a bunch of silver ponytails back in the 1980s like Bill (Ayers) and Bernardine Dohrn, equally radical, who said one day we’re going to have the presidency.”
Breitbart told WND at CPAC that the not-yet released videos included footage of Ayers and Obama openly discussing revolution while Obama was a student at Harvard Law School.
The video released by Breitbart.com after Breitbart’s death, however, showed law student Obama embracing Prof. Derrick Bell, a radical academic with ties to Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s radical pastor for 20 years in Chicago.
“The video did not seem as earthshattering as Breitbart initially claimed it to be, just weeks before the 43-year-old unexpectedly passed away at his home last Thursday,” the New York Daily News observed.
Bannon insisted to WND that the video released by Breitbart.com after Breitbart’s death was the film Breitbart referred to when speaking in February to CPAC.
“There is no other footage,” Bannon insisted. “We were working on the Derrick Bell video when Breitbart died, and we released to the public the video we have.”
Bannon pointed out that during his CPAC speech Breitbart made the point that Obama at Harvard had advocated for “the worst of the worst to join the faculty – radicals at Beirut on the Charles.”
On Feb 5, Breitbart had dinner cooked by Ayers at the home of Ayers and Dohrn after Daily Caller publisher Tucker Carlson won a “Super Bowl Dinner” auctioned off by Ayers for $2,500.
Republican Executive Committee Member Calls for Resignation of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus
RNC chair Reince Priebus is violating RNC rules. PLEASE Call the RNC tomorrow @ 1-202-863-8500 to voice your objection and DEMAND HIS RESIGNATION. Please help out in this effort!
by Truthbearer
Due to an alleged violation of the national
GOP's Rule # 11 (bans favoritism of one candidate while more than one
candidate exists), an Executive Committee member within the GOP calls
for the resignation of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus.
Washington, DC, May 07, 2012 --(PR.com)-- Jeffrey Bales, a Member-at-Large of the Pima County GOP Executive Committee (Tucson, Arizona), says:
“Due to violation of the RNC's Rule #11, I call for Chairman Reince Priebus to resign immediately. It is un-American and beneath the standards established by the Republican Party to violate this rule. It is unethical to support a single Republican Presidential candidate (Mitt Romney) while other Republican candidates remain in the race.
"Further, I call upon Mitt Romney to denounce this behavior and ask that the RNC repair the breach of trust by including the other remaining Republican Presidential candidate, Dr. Ron Paul, in any dispensation of funds, effort and labor. It would benefit all Americans if Mitt Romney would further clarify the fact that 2 candidates remain if he challenged Dr. Ron Paul to a debate."
Rule #11 states:
"Rule No. 11 Candidate Support
(a) The Republican National Committee shall not, without the prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved, contribute money or in-kind aid to any candidate for any public or party office except the nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing deadline for that office. In those states where state law establishes a nonpartisan primary in which Republican candidates could participate, but in which the general election may not include a Republican candidate, the candidate endorsed by a convention held under the authority of the state Republican Party shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the Republican nominee.
(b) No state Republican Party rule or state law shall be observed that allows persons who have participated or are participating in the selection of any nominee of a party other than the Republican Party, including, but not limited to, through the use of a multiparty primary or similar type ballot, to participate in the selection of a nominee of the Republican Party for that general election. No person nominated in violation of this rule shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the nominee of the Republican Party from that state."
Official RNC rules are available online at: http://www.gop.com/images/legal/2008_RULES_Adopted.pdf
Source:
http://www.pr.com/press-release/410950
Washington, DC, May 07, 2012 --(PR.com)-- Jeffrey Bales, a Member-at-Large of the Pima County GOP Executive Committee (Tucson, Arizona), says:
“Due to violation of the RNC's Rule #11, I call for Chairman Reince Priebus to resign immediately. It is un-American and beneath the standards established by the Republican Party to violate this rule. It is unethical to support a single Republican Presidential candidate (Mitt Romney) while other Republican candidates remain in the race.
"Further, I call upon Mitt Romney to denounce this behavior and ask that the RNC repair the breach of trust by including the other remaining Republican Presidential candidate, Dr. Ron Paul, in any dispensation of funds, effort and labor. It would benefit all Americans if Mitt Romney would further clarify the fact that 2 candidates remain if he challenged Dr. Ron Paul to a debate."
Rule #11 states:
"Rule No. 11 Candidate Support
(a) The Republican National Committee shall not, without the prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved, contribute money or in-kind aid to any candidate for any public or party office except the nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing deadline for that office. In those states where state law establishes a nonpartisan primary in which Republican candidates could participate, but in which the general election may not include a Republican candidate, the candidate endorsed by a convention held under the authority of the state Republican Party shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the Republican nominee.
(b) No state Republican Party rule or state law shall be observed that allows persons who have participated or are participating in the selection of any nominee of a party other than the Republican Party, including, but not limited to, through the use of a multiparty primary or similar type ballot, to participate in the selection of a nominee of the Republican Party for that general election. No person nominated in violation of this rule shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the nominee of the Republican Party from that state."
Official RNC rules are available online at: http://www.gop.com/images/legal/2008_RULES_Adopted.pdf
Source:
http://www.pr.com/press-release/410950
Will Mitt Romney go 3rd Party if Ron Paul wins?
By Son Of Thunder
Something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately is that there is a tremendous Military Industrial Complex in this country and its effects on the election process are readily apparent. Last night’s GOB debate on CNN made this abundantly clear as the hacks from the war policy institutes asked ridiculous questions like “Our loving overlords have stopped 41 terrorist attacks since 9/11 thanks to the Patriot Act…” etc. It was really just a sickening show.
Let’s just say though, that Ron Paul is able to triumph over all of the money being thrown into this campaign by the defense contractors like Boeing, Haliburton, etc and win the Republican Nomination. From the polling in Iowa, it looks like he might take that caucus and be off to a good start, so it can happen. If Ron Paul does win Iowa, then New Hampshire, it will look to most people like he may indeed win the nomination. At that point some of the other candidates are sure to drop out, but Mitt Romney has the money to persist and he’s shown the willingness to do that in 2008, and he’s got the Neo-Con establishment behind him.
At that point, in a Ron Paul vs Mitt Romney primary season, you will have three distinct groups running for president:
I think it would be a very interesting election season indeed if we had a three way run for President between Obama, Romney, and Paul.
Something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately is that there is a tremendous Military Industrial Complex in this country and its effects on the election process are readily apparent. Last night’s GOB debate on CNN made this abundantly clear as the hacks from the war policy institutes asked ridiculous questions like “Our loving overlords have stopped 41 terrorist attacks since 9/11 thanks to the Patriot Act…” etc. It was really just a sickening show.
Let’s just say though, that Ron Paul is able to triumph over all of the money being thrown into this campaign by the defense contractors like Boeing, Haliburton, etc and win the Republican Nomination. From the polling in Iowa, it looks like he might take that caucus and be off to a good start, so it can happen. If Ron Paul does win Iowa, then New Hampshire, it will look to most people like he may indeed win the nomination. At that point some of the other candidates are sure to drop out, but Mitt Romney has the money to persist and he’s shown the willingness to do that in 2008, and he’s got the Neo-Con establishment behind him.
At that point, in a Ron Paul vs Mitt Romney primary season, you will have three distinct groups running for president:
- The Democratic Socialists will try to elect Barack Obama
- The Corporatist Neocons will try to elect Mitt Romney
- The every day, freedom loving American will try to elect Ron Paul
So let’s say that Ron Paul triumphs over Mitt Romney and it becomes
clear that he is going to be the Republican nominee. At that point,
what will the Neocons do? They have plenty of money, they have plenty of
policy institutes, and they have plenty of voters who are fooled to
believing in them. Will they just give up? Will they support Obama? (The
defense contractors already donate to both parties, by the way) Or,
will Mitt Romney run as a third party?
Think about it, he has the backing and the money. He has the major media outlets – they’ve been cheering for him all along.
What will he call himself? Will he run as a Neoconservative? Will he
run as a Tea Party candidate? Or will he simply run as an independent?I think it would be a very interesting election season indeed if we had a three way run for President between Obama, Romney, and Paul.
Poll Numbers, Voter Registration Stats Look Bad for Obama and Democrats
Is Obama Negotiating A Treaty That Would Essentially Ban All Buy American Laws? 69 members of the U.S. House of Representatives have sent Barack Obama a letter expressing their concern that a new international treaty currently being negotiated would essentially ban... (more) |
Report: DOJ Fails to Nail Wall St. Bigs... Obama’s 2009 White House summit with finance titans, in which the president warned that only he was standing "between you and the pitchforks" Why, despite widespread out... (more) |
||
Poll Numbers, Voter Registration Stats Look Bad for Obama and Democrats The number of black and Hispanic registered voters has fallen sharply since 2008, posing a serious challenge to the Obama campaign in an election that could turn on the participati... (more) |
Rand Paul: Petition To Stop The Spending
Our
federal deficit now stands at 1.5 trillion dollars and our national
debt is a staggering 14.1 trillion dollar ball and chain on our
economy: That’s over $45,500 for every American man, woman and child.
I have proposed a budget that will end this insanity.
My budget will slash spending back to 2008 pre-stimulus levels, eliminate four cabinet agencies and balance the budget in year five.
And a vote on my budget could come as soon as this week.
But it's vital for conservative activists to keep up the pressure.
That's why if you haven't yet signed your petition in support of my budget proposal, please do so by clicking here.
Then, I would like to ask one more favor of you.
Please forward this email to everyone you know who shares our concern for our fiscal crisis.
Let your friends and relatives know that my budget is the only serious plan to shrink the size of government and balance the budget in five years.
Click here to forward the “Pass the Paul Balanced Budget Plan” petition now.
The establishment just wants my budget to disappear.
So the only way to pass my plan and restore fiscal sanity to America is to turn up the heat and swamp elected officials with petitions from grassroots activists.
I hope I can count on your action today.
Click here to forward the petition to your friends and family.
If you need a refresher on why this bill is so important, take a few minutes to read my email below.
Thanks,
Rand
I don't know about you, but I believe there is something wrong with a government that adds over 4.1 BILLION dollars to its national debt every day.
Spending is out of control. I hope you agree this is a problem.
Our federal deficit now stands at 1.5 trillion dollars and our national debt is a staggering 14.1 trillion dollar ball and chain on our economy -- over $45,500 for every American (even children).
I have a plan to put a stop to it. Right now.
Last year, Republicans in Washington overwhelmingly voted for both a Balanced Budget amendment to the constitution, and for the Cut, Cap and Balance plan.
What do those two things have in common? Both of them required the budget to be in balance in less than 5 years.
I am happy to announce that I have introduced a full budget plan in the US Senate to do just that.
TO CUT four cabinet agencies, including the Department of Education.
TO CAP welfare and medicaid programs, block grant them, and send them back to the states.
TO BALANCE in its 5th year, with years 6-10 in surplus.
My plan spends trillions less than both the President's laughable budget and the House-passed Ryan budget, which does not go far enough in controlling spending.
I am writing you today because I need your help leading the fight to reduce federal spending by passing the Paul Balanced Budget Plan.
Americans are demanding the reduction of government spending, but we must unite to make it clear to Congress that there are only two options.
Vote to massively reduce federal spending or pay the price in 2012.
Congress saw the strength of the Tea Party movement in November, but it will mean nothing if you and I let up now.
Right now there are numerous bills from both parties that only reduce spending by a fraction.
These big government politicians want to splash out a drop when we need to pour the bucket!
They believe you will be appeased by them merely cutting a billion here and there when we need to cut trillions.
Well, their tricks aren't going to work this time.
Will you take the first step now by signing the RAND-PAC Paul Budget Petition?
Your petition will make it clear to your senators that federal spending is a major problem and it must be drastically cut now.
Specifically, my budget will:
So time is short.
Your signed petition will enable RAND-PAC to lead the fight in forcing a vote on this crucial legislation.
In fact, RAND-PAC has plans to reach over 3 million like-minded conservatives in the next 30 days to garner support for the Paul Balanced Budget.
Will you work with me to pass the Paul Balanced Budget?
If so, please click here to sign the petition right away.
Together I know you and I and millions of fed up Americans will return our government to a functional level of spending that allows our economy to thrive and create jobs.
Unfortunately, our plan to contact these millions of Americans isn't cheap.
Which is why I hope you will agree to make a generous contribution of $25, $50, $100 or more to RAND-PAC after signing your petition.
If that is too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10.
I know you are sick and tired of the direction our country is headed. And I'm sure you don't need me to tell you that you are not alone in your frustration. Isn't it time you and I and every other beaten-down American banded together for change?
I believe it is.
Is it too much to ask that our government spend within in reason so you and future generations aren't stripped of every hard-earned penny?
I don't think so.
If you agree, stand with me by clicking here to sign the Paul balanced budget petition now.
I know I can count on you.
For Liberty,
Rand Paul
United States Senator
P.S. Our government's spending is out of control.
Our national debt is at 14.1 trillion dollars and grows by over 4 billion dollars per day!
I am leading the fight along with RAND-PAC to see to it that government spending is reduced through my Balanced budget.
And I want to invite you to be among the first to stand with me and RAND-PAC by signing the petition by clicking here.
After you sign the petition, I hope you will make a donation to RAND-PAC of $25, $50, $100 or more.
If that is too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10 or more.
Your donation will be vital in reaching the millions of Americans like you who are fed up with out-of-control federal spending.
Will you join with me in fighting for reduced government spending?
I have proposed a budget that will end this insanity.
My budget will slash spending back to 2008 pre-stimulus levels, eliminate four cabinet agencies and balance the budget in year five.
And a vote on my budget could come as soon as this week.
But it's vital for conservative activists to keep up the pressure.
That's why if you haven't yet signed your petition in support of my budget proposal, please do so by clicking here.
Then, I would like to ask one more favor of you.
Please forward this email to everyone you know who shares our concern for our fiscal crisis.
Let your friends and relatives know that my budget is the only serious plan to shrink the size of government and balance the budget in five years.
Click here to forward the “Pass the Paul Balanced Budget Plan” petition now.
The establishment just wants my budget to disappear.
So the only way to pass my plan and restore fiscal sanity to America is to turn up the heat and swamp elected officials with petitions from grassroots activists.
I hope I can count on your action today.
Click here to forward the petition to your friends and family.
If you need a refresher on why this bill is so important, take a few minutes to read my email below.
Thanks,
Rand
I don't know about you, but I believe there is something wrong with a government that adds over 4.1 BILLION dollars to its national debt every day.
Spending is out of control. I hope you agree this is a problem.
Our federal deficit now stands at 1.5 trillion dollars and our national debt is a staggering 14.1 trillion dollar ball and chain on our economy -- over $45,500 for every American (even children).
I have a plan to put a stop to it. Right now.
Last year, Republicans in Washington overwhelmingly voted for both a Balanced Budget amendment to the constitution, and for the Cut, Cap and Balance plan.
What do those two things have in common? Both of them required the budget to be in balance in less than 5 years.
I am happy to announce that I have introduced a full budget plan in the US Senate to do just that.
TO CUT four cabinet agencies, including the Department of Education.
TO CAP welfare and medicaid programs, block grant them, and send them back to the states.
TO BALANCE in its 5th year, with years 6-10 in surplus.
My plan spends trillions less than both the President's laughable budget and the House-passed Ryan budget, which does not go far enough in controlling spending.
I am writing you today because I need your help leading the fight to reduce federal spending by passing the Paul Balanced Budget Plan.
Americans are demanding the reduction of government spending, but we must unite to make it clear to Congress that there are only two options.
Vote to massively reduce federal spending or pay the price in 2012.
Congress saw the strength of the Tea Party movement in November, but it will mean nothing if you and I let up now.
Right now there are numerous bills from both parties that only reduce spending by a fraction.
These big government politicians want to splash out a drop when we need to pour the bucket!
They believe you will be appeased by them merely cutting a billion here and there when we need to cut trillions.
Well, their tricks aren't going to work this time.
Will you take the first step now by signing the RAND-PAC Paul Budget Petition?
Your petition will make it clear to your senators that federal spending is a major problem and it must be drastically cut now.
Specifically, my budget will:
** ELIMINATE four cabinet agencies.
** CUT most domestic spending back to 2008, pre-stimulus
levels.
** FIX the defense sequester.
** ENACT meaningful welfare and medicaid reform.
** TEAR UP the
old tax code and replace it with a Flat Tax.
The good news is, because of Senate rules, there WILL be a vote on the Paul
Balanced Budget in the coming weeks, perhaps as early as the week I return to Washington later this month.So time is short.
Your signed petition will enable RAND-PAC to lead the fight in forcing a vote on this crucial legislation.
In fact, RAND-PAC has plans to reach over 3 million like-minded conservatives in the next 30 days to garner support for the Paul Balanced Budget.
Will you work with me to pass the Paul Balanced Budget?
If so, please click here to sign the petition right away.
Together I know you and I and millions of fed up Americans will return our government to a functional level of spending that allows our economy to thrive and create jobs.
Unfortunately, our plan to contact these millions of Americans isn't cheap.
Which is why I hope you will agree to make a generous contribution of $25, $50, $100 or more to RAND-PAC after signing your petition.
If that is too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10.
I know you are sick and tired of the direction our country is headed. And I'm sure you don't need me to tell you that you are not alone in your frustration. Isn't it time you and I and every other beaten-down American banded together for change?
I believe it is.
Is it too much to ask that our government spend within in reason so you and future generations aren't stripped of every hard-earned penny?
I don't think so.
If you agree, stand with me by clicking here to sign the Paul balanced budget petition now.
I know I can count on you.
For Liberty,
Rand Paul
United States Senator
P.S. Our government's spending is out of control.
Our national debt is at 14.1 trillion dollars and grows by over 4 billion dollars per day!
I am leading the fight along with RAND-PAC to see to it that government spending is reduced through my Balanced budget.
And I want to invite you to be among the first to stand with me and RAND-PAC by signing the petition by clicking here.
After you sign the petition, I hope you will make a donation to RAND-PAC of $25, $50, $100 or more.
If that is too much, please consider chipping in with a donation of $10 or more.
Your donation will be vital in reaching the millions of Americans like you who are fed up with out-of-control federal spending.
Will you join with me in fighting for reduced government spending?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)