ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Forensic evidence emerges European e.coli superbug bioengineered to produce human fatalities

Amplify’d from www.infowars.com

Mike Adams

Natural News

June6, 2011

Even as the veggie blame game is now under way across the EU, where a super resistant strain of e.coli is sickening patients and filling hospitals in Germany, virtually no one is talking about how e.coli could have magically become resistant to eight different classes of antibiotic drugs and then suddenly appeared in the food supply.

This particular e.coli variation is a member of the O104 strain, and O104 strains are almost never (normally) resistant to antibiotics. In order for them to acquire this resistance, they must be repeatedly exposed to antibiotics in order to provide the “mutation pressure” that nudges them toward complete drug immunity.

So if you’re curious about the origins of such a strain, you can essentially reverse engineer the genetic code of the e.coli and determine fairly accurately which antibiotics it was exposed to during its development. This step has now been done (see below), and when you look at the genetic decoding of this O104 strain now threatening food consumers across the EU, a fascinating picture emerges of how it must have come into existence.

The genetic code reveals the history

When scientists at Germany’s Robert Koch Institute decoded the genetic makeup of the O104 strain, they found it to be resistant to all the following classes and combinations of antibiotics:

• penicillins

• tetracycline

• nalidixic acid

• trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazol

• cephalosporins

• amoxicillin / clavulanic acid

• piperacillin-sulbactam

• piperacillin-tazobactam

In addition, this O104 strain posses an ability to produce special enzymes that give it what might be called “bacteria superpowers” known technically as ESBLs:

“Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBLs) are enzymes that can be produced by bacteria making them resistant to cephalosporins e.g. cefuroxime, cefotaxime and ceftazidime – which are the most widely used antibiotics in many hospitals,” explains the Health Protection Agency in the UK (http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/Infect…).

On top of that, this O104 strain possesses two genes — TEM-1 and CTX-M-15 — that “have been making doctors shudder since the 1990s,” reports The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentis…). And why do they make doctors shudder? Because they’re so deadly that many people infected with such bacteria experience critical organ failure and simply die.

Bioengineering a deadly superbug

So how, exactly, does a bacterial strain come into existence that’s resistant to over a dozen antibiotics in eight different drug classes and features two deadly gene mutations plus ESBL enzyme capabilities?

There’s really only one way this happens (and only one way) — you have to expose this strain of e.coli to all eight classes of antibiotics drugs. Usually this isn’t done at the same time, of course: You first expose it to penicillin and find the surviving colonies which are resistant to penicillin. You then take those surviving colonies and expose them to tetracycline. The surviving colonies are now resistant to both penicillin and tetracycline. You then expose them to a sulfa drug and collect the surviving colonies from that, and so on. It is a process of genetic selection done in a laboratory with a desired outcome. This is essentially how some bioweapons are engineered by the U.S. Army in its laboratory facility in Ft. Detrick, Maryland (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation…).

Although the actual process is more complicated than this, the upshot is that creating a strain of e.coli that’s resistant to eight classes of antibiotics requires repeated, sustained expose to those antibiotics. It is virtually impossible to imagine how this could happen all by itself in the natural world. For example, if this bacteria originated in the food (as we’ve been told), then where did it acquire all this antibiotic resistance given the fact that antibiotics are not used in vegetables?

When considering the genetic evidence that now confronts us, it is difficult to imagine how this could happen “in the wild.” While resistance to a single antibiotic is common, the creation of a strain of e.coli that’s resistant to eight different classes of antibiotics — in combination — simply defies the laws of genetic permutation and combination in the wild. Simply put, this superbug e.coli strain could not have been created in the wild. And that leaves only one explanation for where it really came from: the lab.

Engineered and then released into the wild

The evidence now points to this deadly strain of e.coli being engineered and then either being released into the food supply or somehow escaping from a lab and entering the food supply inadvertently. If you disagree with that conclusion — and you’re certainly welcome to — then you are forced to conclude that this octobiotic superbug (immune to eight classes of antibiotics) developed randomly on its own… and that conclusion is far scarier than the “bioengineered” explanation because it means octobiotic superbugs can simply appear anywhere at any time without cause. That would be quite an exotic theory indeed.

My conclusion actually makes more sense: This strain of e.coli was almost certainly engineered and then released into the food supply for a specific purpose. What would that purpose be? It’s obvious, I hope.

It’s all problem, reaction, solution at work here. First cause a PROBLEM (a deadly strain of e.coli in the food supply). Then wait for the public REACTION (huge outcry as the population is terrorized by e.coli). In response to that, enact your desired SOLUTION (total control over the global food supply and the outlawing of raw sprouts, raw milk and raw vegetables).

That’s what this is all about, of course. The FDA relied on the same phenomenon in the USA when pushing for its recent “Food Safety Modernization Act” which essentially outlaws small family organic farms unless they lick the boots of FDA regulators. The FDA was able to crush farm freedom in America by piggybacking on the widespread fear that followed e.coli outbreaks in the U.S. food supply. When people are afraid, remember, it’s not difficult to get them to agree to almost any level of regulatory tyranny. And making people afraid of their food is a simple matter… a few government press releases emailed to the mainstream media news affiliates is all it takes.

First ban the natural medicine, then attack the food supply

Now, remember: All this is happening on the heels of the EU ban on medicinal herbs and nutritional supplements — a ban that blatantly outlaws nutritional therapies that help keep people healthy and free from disease. Now that all these herbs and supplements are outlawed, the next step is to make people afraid of fresh food, too. That’s because fresh vegetables are medicinal, and as long as the public has the right to buy fresh vegetables, they can always prevent disease.

But if you can make people AFRAID of fresh vegetables — or even outlaw them altogether — then you can force the entire population onto a diet of dead foods and processed foods that promote degenerative disease and bolster the profits of the powerful drug companies.

It’s all part of the same agenda, you see: Keep people sick, deny them access to healing herbs and supplements, then profit from their suffering at the hands of the global drug cartels.

GMOs play a similar role in all this, of course: They’re designed to contaminate the food supply with genetic code that causes widespread infertility among human beings. And those who are somehow able to reproduce after exposure to GMOs still suffer from degenerative disease that enriches the drug companies from “treatment.”

Do you recall which country was targeted in this recent e.coli scare? Spain. Why Spain? You may recall that leaked cables from Wikileaks revealed that Spain resisted the introduction of GMOs into its agricultural system, even as the U.S. government covertly threatened political retaliation for its resistance. This false blaming of Spain for the e.coli deaths is probably retaliation for Spain’s unwillingness to jump on the GMO bandwagon. (http://www.naturalnews.com/030828_G…)

That’s the real story behind the economic devastation of Spain’s vegetable farmers. It’s one of the subplots being pursued alongside this e.coli superbug scheme.

Food as weapons of war – created by Big Pharma?

By the way, the most likely explanation of where this strain of e.coli was bioengineered is that the drug giants came up with it in their own labs. Who else has access to all the antibiotics and equipment needed to manage the targeted mutations of potentially thousands of e.coli colonies? The drug companies are uniquely positioned to both carry out this plot and profit from it. In other words, they have the means and the motive to engage in precisely such actions.

Aside from the drug companies, perhaps only the infectious disease regulators themselves have this kind of laboratory capacity. The CDC, for example, could probably pull this off if they really wanted to.

The proof that somebody bioengineered this e.coli strain is written right in the DNA of the bacteria. That’s forensic evidence, and what it reveals cannot be denied. This strain underwent repeated and prolonged exposure to eight different classes of antibiotics, and then it somehow managed to appear in the food supply. How do you get to that if not through a well-planned scheme carried out by rogue scientists? There is no such thing as “spontaneous mutation” into a strain that is resistant to the top eight classes of brand-name antibiotic drugs being sold by Big Pharma today. Such mutations have to be deliberate.

Once again, if you disagree with this assessment, then what you’re saying is that NO, it wasn’t done deliberately… it happened accidentally! And again, I’m saying that’s even scarier! Because that means the antibiotic contamination of our world is now at such an extreme level of overkill that a strain of e.coli in the wild can be saturated with eight different classes of antibiotics to the point where it naturally develops into its own deadly superbug. If that’s what people believe, then that’s almost a scarier theory than the bioengineering explanation!

A new era has begun: Bioweapons in your food

But in either case — no matter what you believe — the simple truth is that the world is now facing a new era of global superbug strains of bacteria that can’t be treated with any known pharmaceutical. They can all, of course, be readily killed with colloidal silver, which is exactly why the FDA and world health regulators have viciously attacked colloidal silver companies all these years: They can’t have the public getting its hands on natural antibiotics that really work, you see. That would defeat the whole purpose of making everybody sick in the first place.

In fact, these strains of e.coli superbugs can be quite readily treated with a combination of natural full-spectrum antibiotics from plants such as garlic, ginger, onions and medicinal herbs. On top of that, probiotics can help balance the flora of the digestive tract and “crowd out” the deadly e.coli that might happen by. A healthy immune system and well-functioning digestive tract can fight off an e.coli superbug infection, but that’s yet another fact the medical community doesn’t want you to know. They much prefer you to remain a helpless victim lying in the hospital, waiting to die, with no options available to you. That’s “modern medicine” for ya. They cause the problems that they claim to treat, and then they won’t even treat you with anything that works in the first place.

Nearly all the deaths now attributable to this e.coli outbreak are easily and readily avoidable. These are deaths of ignorance. But even more, they may also be deaths from a new era of food-based bioweapons unleashed by either a group of mad scientists or an agenda-driven institution that has declared war on the human population.



Read more at www.infowars.com
 

A QUESTION OF ELIGIBLITY: Document-imaging expert outlines his case in 22-page filing with FBI Criminal complaint details birth-certificate 'forgery'

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com
A QUESTION OF ELIGIBLITY

Criminal complaint details birth-certificate 'forgery'

Document-imaging expert outlines his case in 22-page filing with FBI

By Jerome R. Corsi




© 2011 WND


President Obama
This is the second of three articles explaining the criminal complaint that scanner-expert Doug Vogt filed last week with the FBI.

The 22-page criminal complaint filed with the FBI by document-imaging expert Doug Vogt charges that individuals within the Hawaii Department of Health, Obama political operatives and an unidentified graphic artist worked in a multi-state conspiracy to create a fraudulent long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama.

Vogt's complaint asserts: "I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs."

He claims the long-form birth certificate the White House released April 27 as an electronic document in PDF format was forged from a composite of legitimate birth certificates obtained from the Hawaii DOH archives and manipulated to replace the original authentic information.

As WND has previously reported,
Obama's birth certificate number appears to be out of sequence with the
birth certificate numbers given to twins born a day after Obama.

Susan Nordyke, the first twin, was born at 2:12 p.m. Aug. 5, 1961, and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10637, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar on Aug. 11, 1961. Gretchen Nordyke was born at 2:17 p.m. and was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11, 1961.

Barack Obama was given certificate No. 151 – 61 – 10641, even though he was born Aug. 4, 1961, the day before the Nordyke twins, and his birth was registered with the Hawaii Department of Health registrar three days earlier, Aug. 8, 1961.

"It is impossible to have Obama's certificate number to be four numbers higher than a certificate that came in three days later," Vogt concludes.

Vogt's forensic examination of the birth certificate number on the White House-released long form concluded that the last "1" in the number "10641," as seen in the figure below, is a grayscale image, while the remaining numbers are not. This is, he says, "irrefutable proof that the certificate number is a composite of two numbers and hence a forgery."

Vogt argues that a person or persons in the Hawaii DOH with access to the document-imaging program searched the database for someone close to the actual birth date of Obama and found someone born near Aug. 4, 1961.

"Obama may have chosen the 4th of August because they had a baby who died close to his date of birth," he writes. "The clerk may have cross-referenced the death database to find someone who had died and had a birth date close to Obama's."

Vogt speculated that someone may have taken the birth certificate number originally assigned an infant girl named Virginia Sunahara, born Aug. 4, 1961, at Wahiawa Hospital in Wahiawa, Oahu, Hawaii.

As WND previously reported, Virginia Sunahara died Aug. 5, 1961, at Kapi'olani hospital, due to complications, the same day the Nordyke twins were born there

Regarding Virginia Sunahara, Vogt made two assumptions:

"The first would be that the Wahiawa Hospital would have filled the COLB (Certificate of Live Birth) form as customary and mailed it to the County Health Department and the Kapiolani Medical Center would have filled out the death certificate. The other less probable would be that her medical records were transferred to Kapiolani Hospital and they would produce the birth certificate and later the death certificate was later included in the group of birth certificates that contained the Nordyke twins."

Vogt speculated that a forger took Virginia Sunahara's birth number as Obama's, knowing that she was long dead and not available to complain about identity theft.

"We can conclude from this that more than one person was involved in the Hawaii Department of Health to assemble the different components that were used and also do the database searches to find the right certificates to create the fraudulent Certificate of Live Birth and finally someone who signed the fraudulent certificate," he writes.

"I believe that after all the components were assembled they were then given to a graphic artist to actually assemble the whole thing and create the finished forgery. That graphic artist could be located anywhere. In short this was a multi-state conspiracy to defraud the United States."

Date stamp irregularities

In Boxes 20 and 22 on the Obama long-form birth certificate, the stamps recording the date the local registrar and registrar general accepted the birth certificate have two different colors on both lines where there should be no color at all.

Also, the color differences are evident in Box 22, both in the printed text of the box and in the stamp recording the date that the local registrar accepted the birth certificate, Vogt says, as seen below:

"What I think this is showing us is that the person who put this fraud together was looking for a form that had the right date, namely "August 8 19_1," Vogt writes, commenting on Box 22. "As you can see the only things that are printed in dark green (R=71, G=92, B=73) are 'Date A' and 'AUG -8 6.' The rest of the type is in black."

Vogt believes this was a clear indication "that the forger was working in color mode and what they copied from had a color value for some reason unless they put a color value on it."

The color differences are also evident in Box 20, the date the local registrar accepted the birth certificate, as seen below:

"The 'AUG -8 196' is in dark green (R=87, G=111, B=87) and the '1' is in black," Vogt observes with regard to Box 20. "Yet again, another irrefutable proof this form is a forgery."

Vogt additionally observes that the font size of the rubber stamp in Box 22 is larger than the stamp used in Box 20.

"This is unlikely because the same rubber stamp would have been used, at the same time, by the same registrar to stamp the dates in both places and sign the form in Box 21," he notes. "Since we have two size letters and numbers, this means these elements were taken from two separate forms that may have been years apart using different rubber stamps."

The official seal is not part of the Obama birth certificate

Vogt references the embossed seal on the short-form Certification of Live Birth posted by FactCheck.org to determine that the Hawaii DOH was using an electric embosser that applies ample pressure to leave a clearly visible embossment.

The embossed seal on the FactCheck.org short-form COLB appeared about three inches from the bottom of the 11-inch paper, but hand seal embossers have only 1 ¾ inch or less clearance for a 2 ¼ inch seal from the edge of the paper.

The figure below shows the embossed seal on the Obama short-form COLB posted by FactCheck.org:

Vogt notes that even on the Nordyke twins' birth certificates, as seen below, the embossed seal was evident, even though the image was inverted to white-on-black from the original microfilm image:

The figure below shows that the embossed seal on the Obama birth certificate released by the White House is visible only because a color filter was used to see it, otherwise it disappears in the design of the security paper:








The figure below shows a close-up of the seal on the Obama long-form birth certificate under color filter:

The figure below shows that the embossed seal on the Obama long-form document disappears into the hash-marked background when the document is viewed normally, without color filters:

"The official seal on the Obama birth certificate released by the White House on April 27 is a second or even third generation image from another form," Vogt concludes. "The seal embossing did not distort the lines or type on the form and it most likely was never part of his certificate. Yet another indication this Certificate of Live Birth is an obvious forgery."

Forged state registrar stamp?

Vogt concludes the state registrar's stamp certifying the Obama April 27 birth certificate is itself a forgery.

He examined a legitimate stamp placed on a long-form birth certificate copy issued by the Hawaii DOH on March 15, 2011.

As seen below, the stamp, with a likeness of the signature of State Registrar Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D., is placed to the bottom right of the certificate, with the date stamp to the left:

Note, that since hand stamps are used on the document issued March 15, 2011, the date stamp and the state registrar's stamp are not on a straight line. Instead, the state registrar's stamp is skewed up on the right.

As seen below, the registrar's stamp applied to Obama's April 27 birth certificate has an error in the word "THE" that reads instead "TXE." The error did not show up on the stamp used one month earlier.

Also note that on the Obama birth certificate, the whole stamp is straight on the form, as seen by the red underline.

Vogt concludes that a graphic artist placed the state registrar's stamp on the Obama birth certificate "to look as straight as possible."

The problem, he stressed was that "no hand stamped notice like this would be placed that perfect on the page."

As seen below, the "A" in Alvin appears to have a smiley face drawn in, an effect accomplished by puting an "E" in the loop of the "A" in Alvin:

Regarding the smiley face in the "A" of "Alvin," Vogt concludes: "We have to assume that either the artifact was already on the security image the forger used, and forgot to erase it, or it was placed there deliberately for some reason that we don't know yet."

Media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, please contact WND.

Read more at www.wnd.com
 

Archaeologist 'absolutely sure' structure beneath Jerusalem's holy mount 2nd Jewish Temple just 'waiting to be unearthed'

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

2nd Jewish Temple just 'waiting to be unearthed'

Archaeologist 'absolutely sure' structure beneath Jerusalem's holy mount

Temple Mount in Jerusalem

One of the most prominent Israeli archaeologists declared today that remains from the First and Second Jewish Temple period – including the Second Temple itself – lie underneath the Temple Mount surface, just waiting to be excavated.

Dr. Eilat Mazar of Hebrew University accused the site's Islamic custodians of destroying Jewish artifacts while attempting to turn the Temple Mount into a "giant mosque."

"I think we will find all the remains starting from the First Temple period and remains of the Temple itself," said Mazar, a third-generation archeologist. "I mean, no one took it out, it's there."

Mazar said she is "absolutely sure" remains from the First and Second Temple periods, including "the Second Temple itself," as well as later remains from the Byzantine and early Islamic periods, are just under the surface of the Temple Mount.

Continued Mazar: "I am absolutely sure, in light of my very rich experience excavating Jerusalem for 30 years now, all these remains are waiting to be revealed. And if it can't be done nowadays because of all kinds of sensitivities, at least we should take care that it won't be ruined for future excavations when time comes."

Mazar was speaking in an interview with "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on New York's WABC Radio.



Mazar heads the excavation department at the City of David, an archaeological village at the foot of the Temple Mount said to be the place where King David built his palace and established his capital.

Mazar has led digs that discovered multiple Temple-era remains, including a tunnel used by the Israelites to conquer Jerusalem, as well as the world's largest ritual bath.

She accused the Waqf, the Islamic custodians of the Temple Mount, of destroying temple artifacts while attempting to turn the Temple Mount into a "giant mosque."

Mazar was speaking to Klein in light of the recent publication of a report by Israeli State Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss, which included a special, largely secret section accusing the Wafq of disposing of Jewish artifacts.

Citing security concerns, the majority of the special report on the mount was not published, but the small portion made public revealed severe deficiencies in Israeli oversight of Islamic construction that has been done on the mount.

The report fingered four Israeli state agencies – the police, the Antiquities Authority, the Jerusalem municipality and the Justice Ministry – for not doing enough to conduct continuous supervision of Wafq construction.

"Protection of artifacts from the Temple Mount and preventing their ruin is a public goal of the first order," the report states. "It is important to note that any digging and other works on the Temple Mount must be conducted in consideration of the character of the place and after receiving all required permits and meeting all archeological guidelines. As a rule, use of heavy machinery should be avoided."

The reference to heavy machinery referred to a decision in 2007 by then-Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to allow the Waqf to use a heavy tractor to dig a 1,300-foot trench around the periphery of the Mount. The Waqf claimed the trench was necessary to replace electrical cables outside mosques on the site.

At the time, the Waqf was accused of destroying artifacts it found at the site.

Allowing the use of bulldozers at any sensitive archaeological site is extremely unusual, particularly at the Temple Mount, which experts say contains sealed layers of artifacts as shallow as two to three feet below the surface.

The mount never has been properly excavated. Heavy equipment could easily damage any existing artifacts, stressed Israeli experts at the time, who asserted the area should be excavated slowly and carefully by hand.

History of destruction

The last time the Waqf conducted a large dig on the Temple Mount – during construction in 1998 of a massive mosque at an area referred to as Solomon's Stables – the Waqf reportedly disposed of truckloads of dirt containing Jewish artifacts from the First and Second Temple periods.

After media reported the disposals, Israeli authorities froze the construction permit given to the Waqf, and the dirt was transferred to Israeli archaeologists for analysis.

The Israeli authorities found scores of Jewish Temple relics in the nearly disposed dirt, including coins with Hebrew writing referencing the Temple, part of a Hasmonean lamp, several other Second Temple lamps, Temple-period pottery with Jewish markings, a marble pillar shaft and other Temple period artifacts.

Mazar's earlier find

WND reported that in 2008 Mazar and a team of archaeologists unearthed what's believed to be the royal seal of an Old Testament prince who is said to have tossed the prophet Jeremiah down a well.

Royal seal bears name of Gedaliah, a prince to Judah's King Zedekiah, mentioned in the Old Testament Book of Jeremiah. (courtesy Dr. Eilat Mazar)

The stamped engraving, known as a "bulla," was discovered about 600 feet south of the Temple Mount in clay, astonishingly well-preserved, bearing the name of Gedaliah, the son of Pashur.

"How absolutely fantastic and special this find is can only be realized when you hold in your hand this magnificent one-centimeter piece of clay and know that it survived 2,600 years in the debris of the destruction, and came to us complete and in perfect condition," Mazar said.

Gedaliah is mentioned by name in Jeremiah 38:1 as he served Judah's King Zedekiah in the final days before Jerusalem was conquered by Babylon's King Nebuchadnezzar in 586 B.C.

The prophet's writings tell of the actions that Gedaliah and his fellow princes took against him:

"Then took they Jeremiah, and cast him into the dungeon of Malchiah the son of Hammelech, that was in the court of the prison: and they let down Jeremiah with cords. And in the dungeon there was no water, but mire: so Jeremiah sunk in the mire." (Jeremiah 38:6)

The letters on the seal are in ancient Hebrew, and Mazar told WND the relic was recovered through a wet-sifting process. She says the method was learned after the "illegal excavations" by the Waqf, the Islamic custodians of the Temple Mount, who have been dumping debris in huge mounds.

"The wet sifting that we did for the destruction debris from our excavations indeed allowed us to uncover hundreds of different kinds of small finds such as tiny fish bones, Phoenician glass beads, Hebrew, Babylonian and Egyptian bullae and seals, pits and seeds, hematite and limestone weights, arrowheads, figurines, jewelry and more," she said.

She added, "It is not very often that such a discovery happens to archaeologists in which real figures of the past shake off the dust of history and so vividly revive the stories of the Bible."

Media wishing to interview Aaron Klein, please contact WND.

If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WND poll.

Read more at www.wnd.com
 

June is National Gay Pride Month and your tax dollars are funding it!



Public Advocate Banner




Yes, it’s true.



June is National Gay Pride Month and your tax dollars are funding festivities around the nation and even overseas.



Last year, President Obama called on all Americans to honor Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Transgenders as special citizens.



But the fact that even one penny of your tax dollars is funding this abnormal sexual behavior is an outrage.



Additionally, a recent press release confirms that the U.S. embassy in Bulgaria is joining the French, Swiss, German, and British embassies to sponsor a gay film festival from June 1st – 29th.



The press release says the goal is to promote acceptance (usually a code word for special rights for homosexuals).



The U.S. will kick-off the party by screening Milk, a film about Harvey Milk, the first radical homosexual activist to be elected in California.



Of course, the film will be followed by an after-show party at the local night club.



In 2009 the U.S. embassy in Albania also screened Milk and held a media workshop for radical homosexual activists -- all paid for with your tax dollars.



These U.S. embassy sponsored gay pride parties are not only offensive to many Americans here at home, they are even more offensive to our host countries overseas.



Even in Iraq, the U.S. embassy in Baghdad threw a gay pride party encouraging everyone to “dress in drag or as a gay icon.”



These brazen sexual displays are considered by most host countries to be an example of the corrupt American culture.



Yet, the Obama Administration and its radical homosexual allies continue to use taxpayer funds to embarrass our country and push the Homosexual Agenda world-wide.



That’s why I will work tirelessly to do everything in my power to fight this corruption from taking hold of our culture.



If you can, today, please support Public Advocate in this fight.



For the Family,





Eugene Delgaudio

President, Public Advocate of the United States


What was the very first human tongue?

Did you know that a poster of the new Europe portrays the ancient

Tower of Babel
, with the slogan, "Many Tongues, One Voice"?



I was quietly pondering that when my wife Josephine asked, "What

was the very first human tongue?



I looked up. "You mean, what was the very first human language?"



"Yes," she replied. "Or do you have any idea what is our closest

modern language to the original, First Tongue?"



A fascinating question, don't you think?



Would you like to know?



As an archaeologist, I believe the answer has now been discovered.



Out in the remote canyons of the Pergatoire River, just south of

La Junta, Colorado, researcher Gary Vey was examining some very

old petroglyphics.



The amazing thing was that these ancient alphabetic symbols were

virtually identical to others found in the Negev desert of Israel,

in South Australia, in Yemen, in Chile and in the British Isles!



On six continents, the ancient language symbols were virtually the

same.



After numerous deciphering attempts, translations were eventually

made with success through an old Hebrew dialect.



The Colorado alphabet consisted of 22 basic, distinct geometric

shapes and some variations. Vey  has termed it “The First Tongue”.



Translations of similar petroglyphs by another team in Australia

proved that they originated with the same root culture and ascribed

to the same rules of grammar and symbols.



Likewise with the petroglyphs in Israel’s Negev desert, documented

by Dr James Harris, during the Harvard expedition in 1994.



These, along with those on other continents, hinted at an original

common language.



ONLY ONE GLOBAL LANGUAGE AT FIRST



If we were to trace the footsteps of the first migration wave, we

would discover that it has left its traces in just ONE UNIVERSAL

LANGUAGE
.



This fact that the whole world once spoke the same language survives

in the racial memory of many peoples.



A fragmentary Sumerian tablet copied by the Oxford cuneiformist

Oliver Gurney speaks of a time when “the whole universe” spoke “in

one tongue.”



The epic myth of Enmerker and the Lord of Araita, published by

Professor S.N. Kramer, of the University of Pennsylvania, records

that all mankind spoke one and the same language until Enki, the

Sumerian god of wisdom, confounded their speech.



The idea that there was a time when all men spoke the same language

is found also in ancient Egyptian and Indian writings.



Likewise, the Popul Vuh, a book of the Central American Maya,

records that “those who gazed at the rising of the sun [the ancestors

who formerly lived eastward of the Americas]… had but one language…

before going west.”



These testimonies support the biblical book of Genesis statement

that “all the earth was of one language, and of one speech.”

(Genesis 11:1)



SUDDEN CONFUSION OF LANGUAGES



Numerous ancient traditions concur that:

(a)     Everyone spoke a single language at first.

(b)     The various languages did not arise capriciously,

independently.

(c)     In a single dramatic event the one original language became

suddenly confused.

(d)    Then from one central point the people were scattered to the

ends of the earth.



Interestingly, all three branches of the human race recall this.



Various peoples, such as the Mexicans, the Chaldeans, the Hindus, the

Greeks, the Chiapa of the Americas, Australian Aboriginal tribes, and

the Fijians, to name a few, were discovered with a tradition concerning

this event in which each tribe received a new language.



So evidently, this is not just some biblical fairytale. This ancient

event has been burnt into the racial memory of mankind as a whole.



LANGUAGE DID NOT JUST "EVOLVE"



Were you aware that no society is known at any point in history which

did not have a fully developed language?  (“Encyclopaedia Brittanica”,

15th ed., Macrop., vol.19, p.1033).



We find NO EVIDENCE for any kind of evolutionary development of

language. The fact is, evolution cannot in any meaningful manner account

for one language, much less hundreds of languages.



In any case, who had time to formulate grammar when we were all supposedly

running around simply trying to survive the next few minutes of life?



I have lived with jungle savages. And did you know that the most primitive

tribes possess the most sophisticated languages?



THE FIRST RELIGION?



Would you like to know what the original religion of planet earth was? Or

what is the closest modern day religion to the original?



Here, again, archaeology comes to the rescue.



IS THE “ONE GOD" IDEA THE RESULT OF EVOLUTION?



Have you ever heard it said that religion just evolved? Or that man's

thinking has evolved gradually from magic, to religion, to science?



That from an initial primitive worship of many gods, religion evolved to

the idea of just one God (monotheism)?



Has anyone ever told you that?



Let's face it, you'll here it today in many places of learning.



Well, we’ve been had! And all so as to get the evolution

theory
accepted.



Well, wouldn't you rather know the truth? Then here it is.



There is not a shred of evidence for this supposed progression from

magic, to religion, to science.



On the contrary, archaeology shows us there was science from the very

start of human presence on earth.



That’s the opposite from what the evolution theory predicted.



SAME CULTURE AND SAME RELIGION ORIGINALLY



So what is the truth about religion?



Well, you’ll recall that  researchers on six continents have been

discovering script in mankind’s “First Tongue”.



And that the content of the translations, although not complete,

suggests a single culture and religious belief system, worldwide.



MONOTHEISM AT FIRST



But the evidence goes further than that.



Two common petroglyphs represent the names of deity - “EL” and “YAH”.

“EL” represents the abstract form of deity - that which cannot be

comprehended by man, while “YAH” is the Creator.



Both concepts represent a single deity - One God - but recognise the

aspects of “knowable” and “unknowable” deity.



A successful translation has been made of the entire top row of the

Colorado inscriptions, reading, “YARE HA EL”, or “PRAISE THE LORD”.



This indicates a monotheistic religious belief at that early time when

there was still a global language.



It hints at an original faith inherited from the earliest ancestors.



The evidence shows that MONOtheism lay at the root of all religions.

And this continued until shortly after 2000 BC – when monotheism began

to degenerate into pantheism, polytheism and animism.



Careful archaeologists and historians (Horn, Faber, Rawlinson, Waddell

and Budge, to name a few) insist, from their discoveries, that the

earliest Sumerians, Iranians, Phoenicians, Egyptians and Indians were

monotheists.



Those early civilizations recognised supremely one only God.



They knew also that there was an original prophecy that although man

had messed up himself and the planet, and could not get himself out of

the mess, the Creator would ultimately send a Rescuer to cure all ills.



ALL NATIONS AWAITED HIM



This, the world’s oldest prophecy, which our first parents claimed was

given to them, was handed down to all their descendants - the prophecy

of a coming Deliverer, no less.



Among the ancient Babylonians, Persians, Chinese, Hindus, Germans,

British, Romans, Egyptians and others, there was an expectation that

this Great One was coming to cure all ills.



The Roman historian Tacitus refers to this expectation among the

nations. (Tacitus, Histories, v.13. Suetonius, “Vespasian, iv)



Dupuis, in L’Origine des Cultus, has collected a vast number of

traditions prevalent in all nations concerning a divine person, born

of a virgin  - that is, without an earthly father.



He would come from heaven for the purpose of delivering mankind. He

would lay down his life once for all, but rising to life again would

ultimately bring a new world.



This prophecy appears to be as old as the human race.



Notice how an ancient poet contemplated this prophecy:



*A golden progeny from heaven descends,

O chaste Lucinda! speed the mother’s pains,

And haste the glorious birth!

...virtue shall restore,

And crimes shall threat the guilty world no more...

The warring nations he in peace shall bind,

And with paternal virtues rule mankind.



And here are the words of another poet of old:



* Hail, great Physician of the world! all hail!

Hail, mighty Infant, who, in years to come,

Shall heal the nations and defraud the tomb!...

Thy daring art shall animate the dead,

And draw the thunder on Thy guilty head;

For Thou shalt die, but from the dark abode

Rise up victorious, and be twice a God!



* The Babylonians and Persians expected a king-redeemer and

hero-sage, who would establish a new age of happiness.



* The Chinese also believed that a great wise man would appear.



* The Hindus believed that the supreme God would reveal himself to

humans and that ultimately would come a new world.



* The ancient Germans looked forward to the renewal of the present

world.



* The Druids of Britain expected the coming of the “Curer of all

ills."



* Likewise, in the earliest Egyptian texts are found prophecies

proclaiming the coming of this Savior of the human race - prophecies

that were already ancient.



In these Egyptian texts we are brought face to face with prophecies

concerning a Messiah who was to come.



It was held that “the teacher awaited since the creation of the world”

had not yet been manifested on earth. His coming was to end in his

sacrifice and bring about the regeneration of mankind.



The ancient Egyptian messianic prophecies refer to the Messiah as “The

Lord of Death and Resurrection”.



In course of time these prophecies of the Messiah became paganised by the

substitution of Osiris (the god of Vegetational Decay and Regeneration)

and other deities.



Osiris then usurped the attributes and functions of the promised Messiah

that had been known in earlier Egyptian prophecy.



Only in the late Egyptian literature (from late in the 18th and early in

the 19th Dynasty) did Osiris and other gods usurp the functions and

attributes of the Promised One.



That was after religious degeneration had set in well and truly.



But originally, the position of Osiris was not messianic. Osiris was at

first no more than an allegorical figurehead, a patron of corn, a

personification of the agricultural seasons. (Stewart The Witness of the

Great Pyramid, 1928, pp. 64,65)



Much, much later he became “a god who had been originally a mortal and

had risen from the dead.”  (E.A. Wallis Budge, The Book of the Dead.

London: British Museum Publications, 1920)



And only then were the added attributes of the Promised One given to him.



Noted archaeologist Professor Budge points out:



"The beliefs which were conceived by the Egyptians in their lowest states

of civilization were mingled with those which reveal the existence of high

spiritual conceptions [at first]." (Budge The Gods of the Egyptians, 1969

Vol. I, p.32)



PURER FAITH AT THE BEGINNING



Although modern Hinduism recognises a multitude of gods (possessing

different influences on human affairs), yet the Indian sacred books

show that originally it had been far otherwise.



Speaking of the Supreme God (known in their language as Brahm):



* Of Him whose glory is so great, there is no image. (Veda)

* [He] illumines all, delights all, whence all proceeded; that by

which they live when born, and that to which all must return.

(Veda)

* He whom the mind alone can perceive; whose essence eludes the

external organs, who has no visible parts, who exists from eternity….

The soul of all beings, whom no being can comprehend. (Institutes of

Menu)



In these passages there is a trace of pantheism beginning to emerge,

but the very language employed bears testimony to the existence among

the Hindus at one period of a far purer faith.



Brahm (the one infinite and eternal God) is just the original Hebrew

Rahm – with the ‘b’ prefixed, which is very frequent in Sanscrit words

derived from Hebrew or Chaldee.



The Hebrew Rahm means “the merciful, or compassionate One”. But Rahm

also means “the Womb”, or “the Bowels” as the seat of compassion.



Now we find such language applied to Brahm, as cannot be accounted for,

except by realising that Brahm had the very same meaning as the Hebrew

Rahm.



Thus we find the god Krishna, in one of the Hindu sacred books (when

asserting his high dignity as a divinity, and his identity with the

Supreme) using these words:



“The great Brahm is my Womb, and in it I place my foetus, and from it

is the procreation of all nature. The great Brahm is the Womb of all

the various forms which are conceived in every natural womb.”



It is very clear that Brahm comes from Rahm which means Womb or

Merciful One. Brahm is just the same as Er-Rahman (“the all-merciful

One”), a title applied by the Turks to the Most High.



Thus the Hindus, despite the deterioration of understanding seen today,

once knew the Creator as “the God of mercy”, that is, “a just God and

a rescuer”.



He was also called in India “the victim-man”. (And among the Buddhists

he was commonly addressed as “Savior of the world”. (Mahawanso, xxxi

“apud”. Pococke’s India in Greece, p. 185)



Furthermore, the meaning of Deva (the generic name for “God” in India)

is similar. Deva originally came from the Chaldean Thav (“Good”).



Thav is also legitimately pronounced Thev and in the emphatic form is

Theva or Thevo (“the Good”). “Th” is frequently pronounced “Dh”. Hence

Deva.



The “v” is frequently dropped (just as “novus” in Latin is “neos” in

Greek). Dheva, or Theva, or Thevo becomes Deva. It also becomes Deo or

Devs” (“God” in Latin) and Theos (“God” in Greek), or Theo-s or Thevo-s.



This reflects the passage in the Bible that says, “There is none good

but One, that is God [Theos – the Good].” (Matthew 19:17)



GRADUAL INCREASE IN GODS



Ancient textual evidence shows that the trend was to increase the number

of gods as time passed, rather than decrease them. (Siegfried H. Horn,

Records of the Past Illuminate the Bible, 1975, p. 12)



It was only the later nations who were POLYtheists (worshipping many

gods).



As an example of how far this trend has developed over the past 4,000

years, it is calculated that today the Hindu religion has 600,000 gods.



Now, are you ready for this? The story is fascinating.



Something BIG occurred - and so earth-shaking, that highly civilized

people who believed in one great God - the Creator - radically changed

their thinking so as to venerate planets, cats, hawks, snakes and

beetles.



What spectacular event brought this about?



And how could an original, healthy, beneficent religious system

degenerate into practices such as human sacrifice?



In an email as brief as this, it is impossible to reveal very much

and also provide evidence, but if you are interested, there is a whole

more available. Please go to

http://www.beforeus.com/stolen-id.php



You are about to discover one of the most amazing dramas of history.

It reads almost like thriller.



Have you ever wondered:

1. Why there are so many languages?

2. Why there are so many religions?



I should warn you. This may upset a few applecarts. But, after all, if

you want to know the truth...



Are you ready for a scandal?



Oh boy, I'm in for it now!



Best wishes

Jonathan Gray



DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?

Please email me your questions. I am here to help you

with any questions on ancient mysteries. Just email

me at info@archaeologyanswers.com

---------------------------------------------

PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIENDS

---------------------------------------------

Did you enjoy this information?

If you know someone who would find these facts

interesting, Click the URL below now to email it to

them, or copy and paste the URL below into your

browser.

http://www.beforeus.com



You are welcome to put it on your own website

exactly as it is, without change, including our email

address.

======================================================

International explorer, archaeologist and author

Jonathan Gray has traveled the world to gather data on

ancient mysteries. He has penetrated some largely

unexplored areas, including parts of the Amazon

headwaters. The author has also led expeditions to the

bottom of the sea and to remote mountain and desert

regions of the world. He lectures internationally.

======================================================

If you have received this mailing in error, or do not wish

to receive any further newsletter mailings from us, simply

click "Reply" and type IN THE SUBJECT LINE "unsubscribe".

Or write to

Surprising Discoveries

Pacific Coast Hwy

PO Box 785

Thames

New Zealand

Three arrested, accused of illegally feeding homeless

Orlando police say they violated a city ordinance restricting the feedings












TSA Anti-Groping bill: Texas needs your help!



Public Advocate Banner
Texas needs your help!



The bill that would defend against sexual abuse by the TSA in the form of groping and porno-scans is at risk of failing in the Texas Legislature.



And they need our help to pass it!



Please call Governor Rick Perry right now at 512-463-2000 and demand he add the TSA Anti-Groping bill (HB 1937) to the agenda for the special session!



You see, the regular legislative session in Texas has ended and while Governor Perry has called a special session to deal with issues such as education, he has yet not added this bill to the agenda.



And by law, anything not specifically added to the agenda by the governor cannot be addressed in the special session.



So call right now and make your voice heard!



Even the Lt. Gov. David Dewhurts, who originally opposed the legislation, has written a letter urging this bill be added to the agenda.



Won’t you let him know your opinion as well?



The number again is 512-463-2000



Thanks for taking action!



For the Family,





Eugene Delgaudio

President, Public Advocate of the United States