ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

European food outbreak soars; mystery deepens

Amplify’d from news.yahoo.com

European food outbreak soars; mystery deepens


By DAVID RISING and MARIA CHENG, Associated Press David Rising And Maria Cheng, Associated Press
Employees of Czech center of national reference laboratories prepare samples of vegetables for molecular testing on EHEC bacteria in Brno
Reuters – Employees of Czech center of national reference laboratories prepare samples of vegetables for molecular …

BERLIN – The number of people hit by a massive European outbreak of foodborne bacterial infections is one third higher than previously known and a stunningly high number of patients suffer from a potentially deadly complication than can shut down their kidneys, officials said Wednesday.

The death toll rose to 17, with German authorities reporting that an 84-year-old woman with the complication had died on Sunday.

Medical authorities appeared no closer to discovering either the source of the infection or the mystery at the heart of the outbreak: why the unusual strain of the E. coli bacteria appears to be causing so many cases of hemolytic uremic syndrome, which attacks the kidneys and can cause seizures, strokes and comas.

"This particular strain we're dealing with now seems to be unique," said Dr. Hilde Kruse, program manager for food safety at WHO Europe:

Germany's national health agency said 1,534 people in the country had been infected by EHEC, a particularly deadly strain of the common bacteria found in the digestive systems of cows, humans and other mammals. The Robert Koch Institute had reported 1,169 a day earlier.

The outbreak has hit at least nine European countries but virtually all of the sick people either live in Germany or recently traveled there.

The Robert Koch Institute said 470 people in Germany were suffering from hemolytic uremic syndrome, or HUS, a number that independent experts called unprecedented in modern medical history. HUS normally occurs in 10 percent of EHEC infections, meaning the number seen in Germany could be expected in an outbreak three times the size being currently reported.

That discrepancy could indicate that a vast number of cases haven't been reported because their symptoms are relatively mild, medical experts said.

But they also offered another, more disturbing theory — the strain of EHEC causing the outbreak in Europe could be more dangerous than any previously seen.

"There may well be a great number of asymptomatic cases out there that we're missing. This could be a much bigger outbreak than we realize right now," said Paul Hunter, a professor of health protection at the University of East Anglia in England. "There might also be something genetically different about this particular strain of E. coli that makes it more virulent."

There are hundreds of different E. coli strains in the environment — every person naturally carries the bacteria — but only a very small percentage are dangerous.

German Agriculture Minister Ilse Aigner said scientists were working nonstop to find the source of the germ that is believed to have been spread in Europe on tainted vegetables — and where in the long journey from farm to grocery store the contamination occurred.

"Hundreds of tests have been done and the responsible agencies ... have determined that most of the patients who have been sickened ate cucumbers, tomatoes and leaf lettuce and primarily in northern Germany," Aigner said on ARD television. "The states that have conducted the tests must now follow back the delivery path to see how the cucumbers, or tomatoes or lettuce got here."

German authorities initially pointed to cucumbers from Spain after people in Hamburg fell ill after eating fresh produce. After tests of some 250 samples of vegetables from around the city, only the three cucumbers from Spain and one other of unknown origin tested positive for E. coli.

But further tests showed that those vegetables, while contaminated, did not cause the outbreak. Officials are still warning all Germans to avoid eating raw cucumbers, tomatoes or lettuce.

Some experts said it might be impossible to ever identify what caused the outbreak, as much of the tainted fresh produce may already have disappeared from markets.

"As in many foodborne disease outbreaks, the culprit may never be identified and the epidemic just fades away," said Brendan Wren, professor of pathogen molecular biology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

To identify which E. coli strain is responsible, scientists must grow the suspect bacteria in a laboratory, which can take up to two days. Once that's done, tests to characterize the strain may take another day or two and those tests can only be done in specialized labs.


"These are complicated molecular tests and it's not something you can do in one day," Hunter said.


In the Czech city of Brno, lab workers wearing white coats and latex gloves meticulously snipped hundreds of pieces off of cucumbers, peppers and other vegetables from Spain, Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark as well as eastern and central Europe to be tested before allowing them into the Czech market for sale.


"None of the samples has tested for the bacteria so far," said lab chief Pavel Alexa.


"It all takes up to four days to do the basic research to determine if a sample is suspicious," Alexa said. If the sample is suspicious, it takes days more to isolate the strain of E.coli responsible, he said.


Spanish officials said, meantime, that they were considering legal action after Europeans swore off Spanish produce in droves after the initial report. And in Germany, farmers' association president Gerd Sonnleitner said the call for people to avoid raw vegetables had cost local farmers an estimated euro30 million ($43 million) so far.


Germany typically sees a maximum of 50 to 60 annual cases of HUS, which has up to a 5 percent fatality rate according to the World Health Organization.


More than 60 percent of the EHEC cases in Germany have been women — 88 percent over the age of 20 — and nearly 90 percent of the HUS cases have been women over the age of 20.


Experts suspect the outbreak may be mainly striking women because they are the ones most likely to be eating fresh produce.


It remains unclear why most of those affected are adults and not children or the elderly, who are normally more susceptible to this illness, said Kruse, the food safety expert at the WHO.


"We should be open to whatever the investigation shows, but adult women are more likely to be exposed to vegetables than other populations," she said.


Last week, Reinhard Burger, head of the Robert Koch Institute, said it was also possible more women were affected because they were predominantly the ones handling food in the kitchen.


The World Health Organization said cases of the E. coli illness have been reported in nine European countries: Austria, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the U.K. All but two cases are either people in Germany, or people who had recently traveled to northern Germany, the organization said.


U.S. health officials say two people who had recently traveled to Hamburg and are now back in the United States have the bug. The agency did not say where in the U.S. the two travelers are, but said it is working with state health departments to learn more about the cases and identify others.


An American tourist who traveled to the Czech Republic from Germany was hospitalized in Prague, officials said.


In addition, Sweden has reported 15 cases of HUS, followed by Denmark with seven, the Netherlands with three, the U.K. with two and Spain with one, according to the European Center forc Disease Prevention and Control.


The Dutch Institute for Public Health and the Environment said that the five people in the Netherlands all recently visited Germany and four have serious kidney problems as well as stomach complaints.


It's "extraordinary" to see so many cases of the kidney complication from a foodborne illness, said Dr. Robert Tauxe, a foodborne disease expert at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "There has not been such an outbreak before that we know of in the history of public health."


He added that the strain of E. coli in the European outbreak has not been seen in the United States, where there have been several high-profile foodborne outbreaks in recent years, but none with such a high death toll.


There's little precedent in Europe, either. In 1996, an E. coli outbreak in the United Kingdom caused 216 cases and 11 deaths.


The World Health Organization said 86 percent of those sickened in the current outbreak were adults, and two-thirds were women. It said it was unusual that more children weren't affected.


Kirsten Grieshaber and Juergen Baetz in Berlin, Karl Ritter in Stockholm, Karel Janicek in Prague and Jan Olsen in Copenhagen contributed to this report.



Explore Related Content











  1. Photo:
    Employees of Czech center of national reference laboratories … EHEC





  2. Food Safety Tips to Keep Your …


    - COMMENTARY | E. coli is the suspected bacterium in an epidemic that has left more …
    Full Story
    ContributorNetwork





  3. E. Coli Outbreak in Germany, Now …


    - In Hamburg, Germany, more than 1,500 people are sick with E. coli (Escherichia …
    Full Story
    ContributorNetwork









  4. Photo:
    This April 30, 2011 photo shows Angie Bailey as she holds a … HUS





  5. FDA Grants Priority Review for …


    - Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. announced today that the U.S. Food and Drug …
    Full Story
    Business Wire









  6. Photo:
    An employee of Czech center of national reference laboratorie … EHEC





  7. Deadly E. Coli Outbreak Claims 16 …


    - A deadly E. coli outbreak that has already been blamed for the deaths of at …
    Full Story
    ContributorNetwork









  8. Photo:
    Employee displays EHEC bacteria strain in petri dish in …





  9. Roche Applied Science and TIB …


    - With the recent outbreak in Europe of Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli , Roche …
    Full Story
    Business Wire









  10. Photo:
    Employee displays stool sample with EHEC bacteria strain in …






Read more at news.yahoo.com
 

Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record 'forged'

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com
A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY

Criminal complaint charges Obama birth record 'forged'

22-page brief filed with FBI claims 'irrefutable proof' document a fraud

By Jerome R. Corsi




© 2011 WND


This is the first of three articles on the criminal complaint that scanner-expert Doug Vogt filed last week with the FBI.





President Obama (White House photo)

An international expert on scanners and document-imaging software filed a 22-page criminal complaint with the FBI, charging that the long-form birth certificate released by the White House is criminally fraudulent.

"What the Obama administration released is a PDF image that they are trying to pass off as a Certificate of Live Birth Long Form printed on green security paper by the Hawaiian Health Department," Doug Vogt writes, "but this form is a created forgery."

Vogt's criminal complaint asserts: "I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011, is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs, and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense."

When the Obama birth certificate "forgery" comes to the public's attention, Vogt continues, "It will surpass all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration."

Since 1993, Vogt has owned Archive Index Systems Inc., in Bellevue, Wash., a company that sells a wide variety of document scanners worldwide and develops document imaging software.

Before that, Vogt owned Nova Typesetting for 11 years.

Curved and non-curved lines of type

Vogt says that the curved surface on the left margin of the Obama birth certificate suggests the county employee who did the original scanning of the document did not take the individual page out of the binder.

"The result is that all the pages in that book display a parallax distorted image of the lines and type," he says.

He claims, however, that the information typed into the form does not curve like the printed text on the form itself.

As seen in Figure 1 below, the word "Sex" on the printed form curves into the binder, while the typed word "Male" does not, Vogt argues.






Vogt observes that the word "Sex" printed on the form slants more to the left than the typed-in word "Male" below it.

He claims to have found another parallax problem in line 6c, "Name of Hospital or Institution."



The word "Name" printed on the form and the lines above and below drop down two pixels while the typed-in hospital name, "Kapiolani," does not, he says.

"The conclusion you must come to is that the typed-in form was superimposed over an existing original Certificate of Live Birth form," Vogt writes.

Vogt contends that the forger placed the typed-in text over the printed copy, creating a composite from a variety of original birth certificate forms.

"In fact, since I found some of the form headings scanned in as binary and grayscale, the form itself is a composite but the person who created it did not flatten the image of the blank form and save it as one file before they started placing the typewriter text on the composite form," he says. "The individual(s) who perpetrated this forgery could not evidently find a blank form in the clerk's imaging database, so they were forced to clean up existing forms and overlay the typewriter type we see here."

'Halo'

A "white-halo effect" around some of the printed and typed-in letters on the form convinced Vogt that the document was a forgery.

If the birth certificate were a scan, as the White House maintained, it should have been a grayscale image in which no haloing effect would be visible, he reasons

Vogt displays the figure below from the document released by the White House, demonstrating the white-halo effect:

He then compares the above example to a grayscale scan in which there is no halo effect:

The next image is a color scan in which there is no halo effect, with the green color of the security paper touching the edge of the type:

The figure below is a black-and-white binary image:

Vogt's argument is that a grayscale scan or a color image scan, as seen above, can be converted to a black-and-white binary image.

However, the presence of grayscale and binary images on the same scan is a clear indication of document manipulation, he contends.

"The important thing to remember is that you cannot have grayscale and binary on the same scan unless the image is a composite," Vogt argues. "This means that different components of the whole image are made up of smaller parts."

What produced the white-halo effect?

"We know that all the original Certificates of Live Birth were microfilmed because we can see the Nordyke certificate (below) was microfilmed," he explains. "Then, some time after 2004, the paper original copies, in post binder books, were scanned using a commercial document scanner with a flat bed, scanned as grayscale images."


Copy of microfilmed original long-form birth certificate of Susan Nordyke, born in Honolulu the day after Obama's reported birthdate.

Vogt concludes that the forger was forced to convert the microfilmed images of original birth certificates to grayscale, as seen below,  before the originals could be used to form a composite.







Susan Nordyke microfilmed birth certificate converted to grayscale

Next, Vogt says, the forger converted the grayscale converted image to a binary image and placed it onto a background form image.

"The problem was that there were still image values for the pixels around the placed type," Vogt observes, "so when he/she placed the type image over the background and instructed the program to bring the type "forward" it blanked out the background image, hence the haloing effect around the type."

'Another smoking gun'

Finally, Vogt contends that the birth certificate released by the White House is loaded with binary and grayscale letters, "which is just another smoking gun that this form is a forgery."

Some of the lines and some of the boxes on the White House birth certificate were scanned using grayscale, but only some of the form headings and some of the letters were grayscale, he said.

Vogt produced the image below to illustrate his point:

Vogt explains:

You will notice the H and al in Hospital, and I in Institution. If and again the h and l in hospital were grayscale images, but the rest of the line is binary. The typewriter line below was scanned in as a binary image. I can also tell you for certainty that the form type was scanned in at a lower resolution (≤200 dpi). This is because of the size of the pixels on the letters were such that the openings on the a and s on the first line are not visible and filled in. This may also further indicate that forger took some of the type images from the microfilmed copies.

As another example of grayscale and binary type on the same line, Vogt selected the name "BARACK" from the form's box "1a," as show below:

"For some reason the 'R' is a grayscale image and the rest is binary," he writes. "That means the 'R' was originally on the form and the rest was not until it was added."

Vogt asks why the forger would leave some grayscale images in the form and not just erase the whole form.

He answer is that the forger needed to leave the grayscale images to re-establish the baseline of the type in order to place the superimposed binary type properly, in line with the other typing on the form.

"This also told me that the forger was an experienced graphic artist," Vogt concludes.

Another example was the birth certificate number itself, as seen below:

"This is just another example of a cut and paste job," Vogt noted. "It also means we do not know what the real birth certificate number is, if there even is one."

Vogt's verdict

Vogt concludes that the Obama birth certificate document released by the White House on April 27 is an "outrageous and obvious" fraud.

"You could truly call this a Frankenstein Certificate of Live Birth," he says in summary.

"It is a logical conclusion," he says, "that since President Barack Obama felt it necessary to have a Certificate of Live Birth forged for himself then we must conclude that there is in fact no birth certificate in Hawaii and therefore he was not born inside the United States, as the Constitution requires, and he knew it and others also knew it but wanted him in office for whatever reason."

Read more at www.wnd.com
 

Be sure to listen to Inquisition Update at 10 AM Central June 1

Be sure to listen to Inquisition Update at 10 AM Central tomorrow morning, June 1, because Attorney Ken Bear Chief of Tamaki Law will be my guest. He is the Attorney who successfully prosecuted ($166.1 Million) the Northwest Jesuit Province Priests for sodomizing 450 Native American children in church-run schools and institutions. I will also mention that Jesuit Father Patrick J. Conroy S.J., our new Chaplain and Jesuit Counsel to the U.S. House of Representatives, is a member of this notorious Northwest Jesuit Province of Priest Pedophilia. I told Ken to come to Inquisition Update with both barrels loaded and to let them have it! Don't miss the broadcast and spread the word.



Go to www.inquisitionupdate.org and click on "listen" at the top of the page just below the banner.

Or:



http://www.libertyradiolive.com/



http://firstamendmentradio.com/



Tom Friess

Inquisition Update

JFK views on separation of Church and State

Amplify’d from www.inquisitionupdate.org

John F. Kennedy

Address to the
Greater Houston Ministerial
Association

delivered 12 September
1960 at the Rice Hotel in Houston, TX

Reverend Meza, Reverend
Reck, I'm grateful for your generous invitation
to state my views.

While the so-called
religious issue is necessarily and properly the
chief topic here tonight, I want to emphasize from the outset that I
believe
that we have far more critical issues in the 1960 campaign; the spread
of Communist influence, until it now festers only 90 miles from the
coast
of Florida -- the humiliating treatment of our President and Vice
President
by those who no longer respect our power -- the hungry children I saw
in
West Virginia, the old people who cannot pay their doctors bills, the
families
forced to give up their farms -- an America with too many slums, with
too
few schools, and too late to the moon and outer space. These are the
real
issues which should decide this campaign. And they are not religious
issues
-- for war and hunger and ignorance and despair know no religious
barrier.

But because I am a
Catholic, and no Catholic has ever been elected President,
the real issues in this campaign have been obscured -- perhaps
deliberately,
in some quarters less responsible than this. So it is apparently
necessary
for me to state once again -- not what kind of church I believe in, for
that should be important only to me -- but what kind of America I
believe in.

I believe in an America
where the separation of church and state is
absolute; where no Catholic prelate would tell the President --
should
he be Catholic -- how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his
parishioners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is
granted
any public funds or political preference, and where no man is denied
public
office merely because his religion differs from the President who might
appoint him, or the people who might elect him.

I believe in an America
that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant
nor Jewish; where no public official either requests or accept
instructions
on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any
other ecclesiastical source; where no religious body seeks to impose
its
will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public
acts
of its officials, and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an
act against one church is treated as an act against all.

For while this year it
may be a Catholic against whom the finger of
suspicion is pointed, in other years it has been -- and may someday be
again -- a Jew, or a Quaker, or a Unitarian, or a Baptist. It was
Virginia's
harassment of Baptist preachers, for example, that led to Jefferson's
statute
of religious freedom. Today, I may
be the victim, but tomorrow it may be
you -- until the whole fabric of our harmonious society is ripped apart
at a time of great national peril.

Finally, I believe in an
America where religious intolerance will someday
end, where all men and all churches are treated as equals, where every
man has the same right to attend or not to attend the church of his
choice,
where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting
of any kind, and where Catholics, Protestants, and Jews, at both the
lay
and the pastoral levels, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain
and
division which have so often marred their works in the past, and
promote
instead the American ideal of brotherhood.

That is the kind of
America in which I believe. And it represents the
kind of Presidency in which I believe, a great office that must be
neither
humbled by making it the instrument of any religious group nor
tarnished
by arbitrarily withholding it -- its occupancy from the members of any
one religious
group. I believe in a President whose views on religion are his own
private
affair, neither imposed upon him by the nation, nor imposed by the
nation
upon him
¹ as a condition to holding that office.
I would not look with
favor upon a President working to subvert the
first amendment's guarantees of religious liberty; nor would our system
of checks and balances permit him to do so. And neither do I look with
favor upon those who would work to subvert Article VI of the
Constitution
by requiring a religious test, even by indirection. For if they
disagree
with that safeguard, they should be openly working to repeal it.

I want a Chief Executive
whose public acts are responsible to all and
obligated to none, who can attend any ceremony, service, or dinner his
office may appropriately require of him to fulfill; and whose
fulfillment
of his Presidential office is not limited or conditioned by any
religious
oath, ritual, or obligation.

This is the kind of
America I believe in -- and this is the kind of
America I fought for in the South Pacific, and the kind my brother died
for in Europe. No one suggested then that we might have a divided
loyalty,
that we did not believe in liberty, or that we belonged to a disloyal
group
that threatened -- I quote -- "the freedoms for which our forefathers
died."

And in fact this is the
kind of America for which our forefathers did
die when they fled here to escape religious test oaths that denied
office to
members of less favored churches -- when they fought for the
Constitution,
the Bill of Rights, the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom -- and
when
they fought at the shrine I visited today, the Alamo. For side by side
with Bowie and Crockett died Fuentes, and McCafferty, and Bailey, and
Badillo,
and Carey -- but no one knows whether they were Catholics or not. For
there
was no religious test there.

I ask you tonight to
follow in that tradition -- to judge me on the
basis of 14 years in the Congress, on my declared stands against an
Ambassador
to the Vatican, against unconstitutional aid to parochial schools, and
against any boycott of the public schools -- which I attended myself.
And
instead of doing this, do not judge me on the basis of these pamphlets
and publications we all have seen that carefully select quotations out
of context from the statements of Catholic church leaders, usually in
other
countries, frequently in other centuries, and rarely relevant to any
situation
here. And always omitting, of course, the statement of the American
Bishops
in 1948 which strongly endorsed Church-State separation, and which more
nearly reflects the views of almost every American Catholic.

I do not consider these
other quotations binding upon my public acts.
Why should you?

But let me say, with
respect to other countries, that I am wholly opposed
to the State being used by any religious group, Catholic or Protestant,
to compel, prohibit, or prosecute the free exercise of any other
religion.
And that goes for any persecution, at any time, by anyone, in any
country. 
And I hope that you and I condemn with equal fervor those nations which
deny their Presidency to Protestants, and those which deny it to
Catholics.
And rather than cite the misdeeds of those who differ, I would also
cite
the record of the Catholic Church in such nations as France and
Ireland,
and the independence of such statesmen as De Gaulle and Adenauer.

But let me stress again
that these are my views.

For contrary to common
newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate
for President.
I am the Democratic
Party's candidate for President who happens also
to be a Catholic.

I do not speak for my
church on public matters; and the church does
not speak for me. Whatever issue may come before me as President, if I
should be elected, on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling
or any other subject, I will make my decision in accordance with these
views -- in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be in the
national
interest, and without regard to outside religious pressure or dictates.
And no power or threat of punishment could cause me to decide
otherwise.

But if the time should
ever come -- and I do not concede any conflict
to be remotely possible -- when my office would require me to either
violate
my conscience or violate the national interest, then I would resign the
office; and I hope any conscientious public servant would do likewise.

But I do not intend to
apologize for these views to my critics of either
Catholic or Protestant faith; nor do I intend to disavow either my
views
or my church in order to win this election.

If I should lose on the
real issues, I shall return to my seat in the
Senate, satisfied that I'd tried my best and was fairly judged.
But if this election is
decided on the basis that 40 million Americans
lost their chance of being President on the day they were baptized,
then
it is the whole nation that will be the loser, in the eyes of Catholics
and non-Catholics around the world, in the eyes of history, and in the
eyes of our own people.

But if, on the other
hand, I should win this election, then I shall
devote every effort of mind and spirit to fulfilling the oath of the
Presidency
-- practically identical, I might add, with the oath I have taken for
14
years in the Congress. For without reservation, I can, "solemnly
swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the
United
States, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and
defend
the Constitution -- so help me God

JFK
giving the American people a warning
JFK text of secret societies Speech
The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open
society.  And
we are as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret
societies.  To secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We
decided long
ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of
pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers, which are cited to justify
it.  Even today, there’s little value in opposing the threat
of a
closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions.  Even
today,
there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our
traditions do not survive with it.  And there is very grave
danger,
that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by
those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official
censorship and concealment.  That I do not intend to permit to
the
extent it is in my control.  And no official of my
administration
whether his rank is high or low civilian or military should interpret
my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news to stifle
dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to with hold from the
press  and
the public  or to withhold from the press and the
public  the facts
they need to know.  For we are opposed around the world by a
monolithic
and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for
expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration, instead of invasion
on subversion, instead of election on intimidation, instead of free
choice on guerrillas by night, instead of armies by day.  It
is a
system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into a
building of a tightly knit highly efficient machine  that
combines
military, diplomatic intelligence, economic, scientific, and political
operations.  Its preparations are concealed, not published.
Its
mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not
praised.  No expenditure is questioned no rumor is printed. No
secret
is revealed.  No President should fear public scrutiny of his
program. 
For from that scrutiny comes understanding.  And from that
understanding, comes support or opposition, and both are
necessary. 
This administration intends to be candid about its errors. 
For as a
wise man once said "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse
to correct it."  We intend to accept full responsibility for
our
errors.  And we expect you to point them out when we miss
them. 
Without debate, without criticism no administration and no
country  can
succeed and no republic
can survive.  And that is why our press was
protected by the First Amendment the only business in America
specifically protected by the Constitution.  Not primarily to
amuse and
entertain not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental not to
simply ‘give the public what it wants’ this means greater coverage and
analysis of international news for it is no longer far away and foreign
but close at hand and local.  And it means that government at
all
levels must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest
possible information outside the narrowest limits of national
security.  And so it is to the printing press to the recorder
of man’s
deeds the keeper of his conscious.  The courier of his
news.  That we
look for strength and assistance.  Confident, that with your
help  man
will be what he was born to be FREE
and INDEPENDENT
.
Read more at www.inquisitionupdate.org
 

Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered

Amplify’d from www.inquisitionupdate.org

Obama Bombshell Redistribution of Wealth Audio Uncovered

This is a quote from the:
ENCYCLICAL LETTER

CARITAS IN VERITATE

OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF

BENEDICT XVI

"The processes of globalization, suitably understood and directed, open up the
unprecedented possibility of large-scale redistribution of wealth on a
world-wide scale; if badly directed, however, they can lead to an increase in
poverty and inequality, and could even trigger a global crisis."

Pssst it sounds like Obama's agenda.
Do you think obama is giving the orders or the pope
?
Listen to both videos before deciding!!
ENCYCLICAL LETTER

CARITAS IN VERITATE


OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF

BENEDICT XVI

TO THE BISHOPS

PRIESTS AND DEACONS

MEN AND WOMEN RELIGIOUS

THE LAY FAITHFUL

AND ALL PEOPLE OF GOOD WILL

ON INTEGRAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

IN CHARITY AND TRUTH
Below are excepts from the Encyclical letter.
The Popes Plans on Organizing
by Richard Bennett Click here

In the face of the unrelenting growth of global interdependence, there is
a strongly felt need, even in the midst of a global recession, for a reform of
the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions
and international finance
, so that the concept of the family of nations can
acquire real teeth.

Obviously it would
have to have the authority to ensure compliance with its decisions from all
parties, and also with the coordinated measures adopted in various international
forums. Without this, despite the great progress accomplished in various
sectors, international law would risk being conditioned by the balance of power
among the strongest nations.

Furthermore, such an authority would need to be universally
recognized and to be vested with the effective power to ensure security for all,
regard for justice, and respect for rights.

It is necessary
to correct the malfunctions, some of them serious, that cause new
divisions between peoples and within peoples, and also to ensure that the
redistribution of wealth does not come about through the redistribution or
increase of poverty

In order not to produce a dangerous universal power
of a tyrannical nature, the governance of globalization must be marked by
subsidiarity
, articulated into several layers and involving different levels
that can work together. Globalization certainly requires authority, insofar as
it poses the problem of a global common good that needs to be pursued. This
authority, however, must be organized in a subsidiary and stratified way,
if it is not to infringe upon freedom and if it is to yield effective results in
practice.

On this front too, there is a pressing moral need for renewed solidarity,
especially in relationships between developing countries and those that are
highly industrialized. The technologically advanced societies can
and must lower their domestic energy consumption, either through an evolution in
manufacturing methods or through greater ecological sensitivity among their
citizens.

Wealth Redistribution
the civil order, for
its self-regulation, also needed intervention from the State for purposes of
redistribution.

The processes of globalization, suitably understood and directed, open up the
unprecedented possibility of large-scale redistribution of wealth on a
world-wide scale; if badly directed, however, they can lead to an increase in
poverty and inequality, and could even trigger a global crisis.

What is also needed, though, is a worldwide redistribution of
energy resources, so that countries lacking those resources can have access to
them.

But it also needs just laws and forms of redistribution governed
by politics, and what is more, it needs works redolent of the spirit of gift.

Religiously Guided
They also require the construction of a social
order that at last conforms to the moral order, to the interconnection between
moral and social spheres, and to the link between politics and the economic and
civil spheres, as envisaged by the Charter of the United Nations.

Much in fact depends on the underlying system of morality. On this subject
the Church's social doctrine can make a specific contribution

Such an authority would need to be regulated by law,
to observe consistently the principles of subsidiarity and solidarity, to seek
to establish the common good, and to make a commitment to
securing authentic integral human development inspired by the values of charity
in truth
.

The
exclusion of religion from the public square — and, at the other extreme,
religious fundamentalism — hinders an encounter between persons and their
collaboration for the progress of humanity.

the duty of believers to unite their efforts with those of all men and
women of good will, with the followers of other religions and with
non-believers, so that this world of ours may effectively correspond to the
divine plan: living as a family under the Creator's watchful eye.

Manage Finance, Disarm People, & Control Food Supply
To manage the global economy; to
revive economies hit by the crisis; to avoid any deterioration of the present
crisis and the greater imbalances that would result; to bring about integral and
timely disarmament, food security and peace; to guarantee the protection of the
environment and to regulate migration: for all this, there is urgent need of a
true world political authority,
as my predecessor Blessed John XXIII
indicated some years ago.

To read the whole letter go to source below

ENCYCLICAL LETTER

CARITAS IN VERITATE


OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF

BENEDICT XVI  Click here for source

Pope Demands World Government

See more at www.inquisitionupdate.org
 

Part of the Patriot Act - Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians!

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com





Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians!


See more at www.youtube.com
 

Obama Justifies FEMA imprisonment of civilians!

Part of the Patriot Act

The THUNDERING Song