Long Term Effects Of Radiation Fallout
Japan Nuclear Disaster: Christopher Everard On Long Term Effects Of Radiation Fallout
NotForSale2NWO
March 23rd, 2011
The Intel Hub Radio with special guest Chris Everard. Japan Nuclear Disaster and its implications for the world in the years to come.
This is an important broadcast that covers the likely long term effects on the environment from the radiation released in Japan.
Download Or Listen To The Broadcast Here
http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/Intel_Hub/Intel_Hub.2011-03-22_16k.mp3
The Intel Hub Free Radio Archives
http://oraclebroadcasting.com/archives.php?who=Intel_Hub
The Intel Hub
http://theintelhub.com
http://theintelhubradio.com
Oracle Broadcasting
http://oraclebroadcasting.com
Read more at theintelhub.comWe are live weekdays 8 to 10pm est.
8 Out Of 18 EPA Monitors Not Working?
8 Out Of 18 EPA Air Radiation Monitors Under Survery, May Not Be “Working”
NotForSale2NWO
March 22nd, 2011
Live Intel Hub Radio Report
Some Radiation-Tracking Air Monitors May Not Be Working Properly, EPA Says
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/some-radiation-tracking-air-monitors…
Japanese Nuclear Emergency: Radiation Monitoring
http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/
UC Berkeley Nuclear Engineering Air Monitoring Station
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/UCBAirSampling
Read more at theintelhub.com
A View of the NWO War Room
A View of the NWO War Room
Notice their ‘world of war’ is played on a Masonic checkerboard of ‘opposites’
Before Its News
by Zen Gardner
March 22nd, 2011
Nothing like a map to know where you’re going. In the case of the NWO, the world is like a chess game, where they move all the major pieces and just crush the pawns that get in the way.
But if you want to know what’s coming, look how clearly things appear when you can assess where power is placed. Here are a few things I found enlightening when looking at the global positioning of the invading US arm of the NWO, precursor of the Army of the “United Nations”.
1. The official statistics:
The U.S. maintains 716 operational military bases in 110 countries. There are 250,000 military personnel, men and women, employed on those bases. The annual cost of the US military presence is in the billions.
The sweep of history:
WW II ends, and the U.S. corporate elite sees its future in the war industry, an endless production of bigger and more destructive arsenals. A good pretext is the threat from the USSR, the escalation of fear, the arms race, the creation of the “communist menace.”
Always, there is the need for an enemy (Castro, Ho Chi MInh); after glasnost, new enemies are found: Chavez, Iran, drugs, then Al Qaeda and terrorism. Source
2. Now let’s see where the U.S. air and military bases are in the middle east.
That doesn’t look good for Iran now, does it…
Over 50 U.S. reported airbases in this vicinity alone…and this was in 2008!
3. Here’s a map indicating which countries have one or more full fledged military bases.
Read more at theintelhub.com
Radiation level 1,600 times above norm
Radiation level 1,600 times above norm in Fukushima nuke zone
See more at www.youtube.com
Corporate Media Ignores Radiation Levels
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 23, 2011
The Kyodo News Agency reports that radiation around the hobbled Fukushima nuclear plant is 1,600 times the normal level. The astounding figure was released to the media by the International Atomic Energy Agency officials on Monday.
Data collected by an IAEA team show that radiation levels of 161 microsievert per hour have been detected in the town of Namie, Fukushima Prefecture, the officials said, according to a report posted by House of Japan.
Tests carried out by IAEA technicians in numerous locations around the plant revealed radiation levels ranging between 2 and 160 microsievert per hour, while the normal level for the area should not exceed 0.1 microsievert per hour, the Russian newsite RIA Novosti reports.
A CBS affiliate in Wisconsin also reported on the high radiation levels that will ultimately be dispersed around the world and will undoubtedly result in unprecedented health problems and premature death from cancer. Most of the corporate media, however, did not bother to report the story.
Reuters reported that there was 500 microsieverts of radiation per hour on March 18 at the site but does not explain what this means. It did not mention the 1,600 number.
Earlier in the week, nuclear energy critic and author Hirose Takashi wrote about the media effort to obfuscate the truth about Fukushima:
Around Fukushima Daiichi Station they measured 400 millisieverts – that’s per hour. With this measurement (Chief Cabinet Secretary) Edano admitted for the first time that there was a danger to health, but he didn’t explain what this means. All of the information media are at fault here I think. They are saying stupid things like, why, we are exposed to radiation all the time in our daily life, we get radiation from outer space. But that’s one millisievert per year. A year has 365 days, a day has 24 hours; multiply 365 by 24, you get 8760. Multiply the 400 millisieverts by that, you get 3,500,000 the normal dose. You call that safe? And what media have reported this?
Read more at www.infowars.comThe corporate media as the complaisant handmaiden of the elite are obliged to cover up the truth. In the end, all of us – especially our children – will pay for it.
U.N. treaty would strip parent's rights
U.N. treaty would strip parent's rights
Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow
U.S. senators, led by Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), have introduced a resolution opposing ratification of the United Nations' Convention on the Rights of the Child. The treaty would control virtually all political decisions about parents and children in America.
Michael Farris of Parental Rights.org says President Barack Obama and liberals in the Senate want the treaty ratified, which has led to problems in other countries.
"One of the most horrendous cases that were actually litigated under this treaty was in South Africa Constitutional Court, where a 12-year-old girl had her grandmother murdered on a contract hire and she paid these two guys by having sex with them," Farris explains.
The court ruled that under the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the child had a right to stay out of jail except as a last resort. Since it was a first offense, incarceration would have violated the treaty.
"It transfers all decision-making authority away from parents and really ultimately puts it in the hands of the government -- because the treaty regime understands that kids can't make decisions alone, so they re-empower the government to make decisions rather than parents making decisions for kids," says the spokesman.
Farris contends that once people become informed of the dangers of the treaty they will contact their senators to vote in favor of the resolution to oppose ratification.