ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Gay priest and College reach settlement

Amplify’d from articles.philly.com

Gay priest, Chestnut Hill College reach settlement

By Bonnie L. Cook, INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

A former adjunct professor of religion at Chestnut Hill College who was dismissed from his post because he is gay announced this afternoon that a settlement has been reached between himself and the Catholic-based institution.

Father James St. George, 45, said in a statement issued by his publicist that he had reached "an amicable resolution with Chestnut Hill College that will end this controversy."

The resolution reached over the weekend was "consistent with the religious beliefs of each party," the statement said. The cleric asked the news media to "respect the privacy of this resolution."

Terms of the agreement were not made public.

A press conference that had been set for this morning, at which St. George and school officials were to have jointly appeared, was abruptly cancelled via an urgent email sent to reporters at 8 a.m. No explanation was given.

St. George, pastor of St. Miriam Catholic Apostolic Church of Blue Bell, had taught a variety of religious topics at the college since fall of 2009 before learning his contract would not be renewed in February.

School officials said they took that action after learning that St. George had made public statements on his blog about being in a 15-year relationship with a man. They also said they did not know he was affiliated with the Old Apostolic Catholic Church which is not recognized by the Vatican.

St. George, countering that his gayness was an open matter, accused the school of anti-gay bias. He also claimed he had disclosed to the school his Apostolic Church affiliation during the hiring process and was told it was not a problem.

The school's action infuriated some students who liked St. George's classes and felt that he was getting a raw deal from the school. They were prepared to rally on his behalf Saturday when they learned that a settlement was imminent.

Neither side would comment on the settlement this afternoon. Asked for an explanation, publicist Frank Keel emailed: "The terms of the resolution are private and confidential. Father Jim will not be returning to teach at Chestnut Hill College."

Keel would not respond to questions about whether there was a monetary settlement, what each party agreed to, or what Father St. George would do next.

The full statement read:

"I am pleased to announce that I have reached an amicable resolution with Chestnut Hill College that will end this controversy. This resolution is consistent with each party's respective religious beliefs and was arrived at over this past weekend.

"Chestnut Hill College and I have expressed our respect for each other's churches, however different our religious principles may be. We are committed to moving forward and tending to our respective ministries. Neither of us is interested in rehashing what has occurred in the past and we request that the media respect the privacy of this resolution and allow both parties to return to our respective missions."

A spokeswoman for the college did not return a phone call.

Contact staff writer Bonnie L. Cook at 610-313-8232 or bcook@phillynews.com
Read more at articles.philly.com
 

Obama to visit Archbishop Romero tomb

Amplify’d from www.allvoices.com

Obama to visit Romero tomb.

Leaders from Latin American and Caribbean nations meet at a two-day summit in Mexico
Leaders from Latin American and Caribbean nations meet at a two-day summit in Mexico

American President Barak Obama is scheduled to visit the tomb of Salvadoran “saint” Oscar Romero this week. Romero, a former Archbishop of El Salvador was brutally slain while performing Mass on the evening of March 24th, 1980.

The widely beloved cleric had previously been receiving death threats because of his outspokenness on behalf of the impoverished masses of his country and corresponding criticism of its wealthy, military-backed oligarchs. His tragic death – now believed to have been on the instruction of right-wing military strong-man Major Roberto d’Aubuisson – first led to international outrage and, after some time, efforts to have Romero beatified. So far, those efforts have been resisted by the Vatican.

Last December, following lobbying by organizations like the London-based Archbishop Romero Trust (http://www.romerotrust.org.uk/), the United Nations declared March 24th the International Day for the Right to the Truth concerning Gross Human Rights Violations and for the Dignity of Victims. At that time Romero Trust Chairman Julian Filchosky hailed the UN’s recognition of Romero as an extraordinary development.

The Jesuit led Jose Simeon Cañas Central American University in El Salvador – which also experienced the brutality of the Salvadoran military firsthand in the 1980s – also applauded the UN’s move saying “This is a homage to Monseñor Romero and should fill us with pride as Salvadorans, and with a sensation that the world, in some way, has declared Monseñor Romero a saint. Now he is not only Saint Romero of the Americas...countries with little Catholic tradition such as Azerbaijan and India backed the (UN) proposal.”

Obama will be in El Salvador as part of a Latin American tour that began on Sunday with a visit to Brazil. The tour, which some feel is intended to mark the beginning of a new era in US-Latin American relations, also includes a visit to Chile, where Obama arrived today. American backing of brutal, dictatorial regimes in Latin America, like Agusto Pinochet’s Chile, is a legacy Obama is keen to distance himself and his administration from.

Speaking to the Washington Post recently, former U.S. ambassador to El Salvador (early 1980s) Robert WhiteRobert White said that Obama’s visit to Romero’s tomb “is like a U.S. stamp of approval on the positive influence Romero’s life and death have had on Latin America and the world.”

However many observers – including many Salvadorians and other Latin Americans - will probably view his homage to Romero as a potentially pointless symbol. They will be looking for more tangible demonstrations of support from their super-power northern neighbour. Salvadorans will particularly be looking for US assistance in addressing the Mexican cartel catalyzed or compounded increase in drug related crime and violence that currently undermines their impoverished nation’s efforts to end its legacy of exploitation and underdevelopment.

And outside the Americas, people like Archbishop Romero Trust supporter Pamela Lowe (of Norwich Justice and Peace, Norfolk, England) will also be paying close attention to Obama’s visit, hopeful that America’s first black president can indeed put an end to a pattern of US-Latin American interaction that has historically seen the masses for whom Romero lived and died treated with something approaching criminal negligence.

On Sunday Norwich Justice and Peace will commemorate Romero's death by screening the film “Monseñor: The Last Journey of Oscar Romero”. As promotional material from the group states "this is a new documentary that explores the last three years of Romero’s life." The narrative is developed "through Romero’s own words in extracts from his Sunday homilies, broadcast on radio, and from his personal diary."

Filochowski, who was personally acquainted with Romero, will introduce the film.

Read more at www.allvoices.com
 

Ongoing Chuch Abuse Scandal

Amplify’d from www.channel3000.com

Wineke: Ongoing Chuch Abuse Scandal Continues To Unfold

Columnist Examines Scandal's Latest In Philadelphia

By Bill Wineke
Special To Channel 3000
And while we were preoccupied in Madison ...

A grand jury in Philadelphia indicted a high-ranking official of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia, charging him with endangering the safety of children by moving predator priests around the diocese.

The archdiocese responded by suspending 21 priests from active ministry in the Philadelphia area.

Is this sordid story never going to end?

The story of the church and the sexual abuse of children has been recurring since at least 1992 and bishops have repeatedly expressed their shock and announced ever more dramatic programs to protect kids.

A decade later, in 2002, Boston's Cardinal Bernard Law resigned in disgrace after court records showed he continually protected priests who had raped kids. Had he been in any other profession, would surely have been arrested. As it was, Vatican assigned him to a luxurious parish in Rome, where he continues to set policy for the church.

Now, Monsignor William Lynn, former Secretary for the Clergy of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia, is under indictment.

Now, here's what strikes me: All along the way, church officials have assured us that the abuse took place decades earlier and that new policies are in place and that they are really, really sorry.

The Philadelphia crimes took place about a decade ago – long after the scandals were making front-page news. And, in Philadelphia, at least, those committing them were on the job until a couple of weeks ago.

You can read the grand jury report in its entirety at a website BishopAccountability.org but here is a summary:

“The rapist priests we accuse were well known to the Secretary of the Clergy but he cloaked their conduct and put them in place to do it again. The procedures implemented by the Archdiocese to help the victims are, in fact, designed to help the abusers and the Archdiocese itself. Worst of all, apparent abusers – dozens of them, we believe – remain on duty in the Archdiocese today with open access to young persons.”

It's not that the church didn't respond to complaints from people who were abused. Its victim advocates interviewed, asked them all sorts of personal questions, assured them of confidentiality – and then gave their statements to diocesan lawyers for use in protecting the church.

There are heroes in this sordid tale. One is a local priest. The Rev. Thomas Doyle, originally of Spring Green, who, in 1985, worked for the Vatican's Washington office and prepared a report warning that clergy sexual abuse would become a major problem for the church.

The church, basically, banished him. Doyle ended up being a military chaplain and, in 2004, was fired even from that job.

Now, in 2011, we read a grand jury report that asserts “We would have assumed that by the year 2011, after all the revelations both here and around the world, that the church would not risk its youth by leaving them in the presence of priets subject to substantial evidence of abuse. This is not the case.. .” The grand jury said 37 priests with current allegations of abuse were still wearing collars.

I've argued for a long time that the problem isn't priests who abuse. I've never seen evidence a Roman Catholic priest is any more likely to rape a kid than is, say, a school teacher. I've argued the problem is bishops who cover up the crimes.

But, now I'm beginning to wonder if the problem isn't deeper than that. Don't innocent clergy and rank and file pew-sitters bear some responsibility for what is done in their names?



To find out more on this, visit Channel 3000's Search page.


Read more at www.channel3000.com
 

The Praying Parrot

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com





CharlieO The Praying Parrot - Now I Lay Me Down To Sleep


See more at www.youtube.com
 

We Need a New Catholic Church

Amplify’d from www.huffingtonpost.com


We Need a New Catholic Church






Sinéad O'Connor


Singer/songwriter

I got involved in "the church struggle" because I passionately loved the essence of Catholicism from the moment I was born into it. Perhaps I'm not as unusual as I like to think I am, in that I wasn't affected at all negatively by Catholicism as a child or young person. Except to say I observed with great sadness the heaviness my grandparents generation carried from being taught it was a sin to have self esteem. Or to love making love with their husbands.

From a small child, almost all my internal life revolved around Catholicism. It was my secret love and my passionate obsession, as I am unashamed to say it still is. The knowledge that the mother of Jesus has appeared to little children and that this beautiful soul, her son, has defeated death and makes magic every day even in my own little life, is a solid cedar ship within which I have sailed oceans both beautiful and terrible all my life and I never want to get off no matter what the weather.

So because I believe, I thought it was worth risking all my soul in the struggle to persuade the Vatican to honour the body of Christ and our beautiful church by standing down and requesting prosecution for those in leadership who turned their back on Christ when he manifested in those who were raped, assaulted, molested abused and humiliated. And when he manifested also in the loved ones of those victims.

I thought the Vatican might be moved eventually, if enough people kept up the pressure. But after over 30 years of knowledge and pressure, at Christmas pope Benedict addressed his cardinals on the matter using the following words: "in the 1970s it was theorized that pedophillia was fully in conformity with man and and with children." He went on to say "nothing was considered either good or evil in itself." I can tell you that's not what the chemist told my granny when she asked for condoms.

His point apparently was to say that there was no more of an accepting attitude of pedophilia within the church than there was in secular society. Nonsense of course to suggest that after laws against pedophilia were enacted in the late 1800s anyone theorized it as acceptable. And there can never have been a child on earth who felt even slightly in conformity with pedophilia. Hardly needs stating that Jesus Christ would never have been in conformity either.

When I heard those words I knew there was no point fighting any more. There is no hope of morality or a fiery cleansing of the Vatican from within on this issue of respect for Christ. Only a headset entirely bereft of morality could have made such an astounding remark. And clearly a phalanx of lawyers added to this lack of morality means those of us who were fighting for a cleansed Vatican may as well throw down our arms. My dead mother has more chance of releasing her debut album.

However, while there are zillions of us who do not identify with the current Vatican's manifest definition of Catholicism, we still identify with the beautiful essence of the Catholicism we grew up with. But the child is being drowned, and the bathwater needs to get thrown out. And no one at the Vatican is going to do that. So we're going to have to run in and rescue the baby and raise it ourselves.

We must now start a provisional alternative Catholic Church for all, including present Catholic clergy, who have been let down and disillusioned and who want to see a Catholic Church which honours Christ with truth, honours the sacraments and the people's spiritual needs, has no hierarchy and does not dictate who God can love or not love. Nor whom can be in or out. Nor whether a woman is fit for Christ to make himself manifest through in priesthood. Nor whether the sacrament of sacred marriage and the comfort of children and grandchildren should be denied to priests.

In history, people move. They create what they feel they deserve. Times change.

I don't know how, or what, I just know we need a new Catholic Church. If we stick to the sacraments and honor them fully, the rest will follow. (Allow me to point out that the Catholic hierarchies' refusals to be publicly questioned on abuse and instead using the Mass as a platform is a gross disrespect of the sacrament of Mass). The rest of how to organize it, I mean, we can make it up as we go along. But if we don't start it will not happen. At least until our children or their children make it happen, which they will.

I ask please this Easter that we consider moving the stone away from the tomb and let the man out. He taught us to fear nothing on earth. And that prayer will give us answers. So, let's pray that we may have the courage to build ourselves a new church. Let whomever wants to stay with the current church stay gladly. But let those of us that want something different create something different. And may God inspire and embolden us and give us faith and strength. But above all give us love. For Christ and for each other that we may work together and make something beautiful which will be a thanksgiving to God, an honouring of Jesus, a fit house for The Holy Spirit and a comfort to us.


Related News On Huffington Post:

More News Posts:  « First   Prev  1  2  3  4  Next   Last » 


 































Read more from Huffington Post bloggers:


Sinéad O'Connor


Sinéad O'Connor: Some Burning Questions for the Pope

Rita Nakashima Brock, Ph. D.


Rita Nakashima Brock, Ph. D.: Predatory Priests, Church Cover-Ups and the Belgian Abberation

Angela Bonavoglia


Angela Bonavoglia: Cardinal Levada Blames Celibacy for Clergy Sex Abuse

Rev. James Martin, S.J.


Rev. James Martin, S.J.: Acts of Contrition: Why Real Penance in the Church Is "Necessary"

Angela Bonavoglia


Angela Bonavoglia: Benedict in America: The Man Show

William F. McMurry


William F. McMurry: Protecting Children from the Church's Abuse Of Power

Sinéad O'Connor


Sinéad O'Connor: An Open Letter to the Pope

Rory Fitzgerald


Rory Fitzgerald: Sinéad O'Connor: An Unlikely Prophet for a Scandalized Church

Emilie Townes


Emilie Townes: The Church as Sexual Predator

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach


Rabbi Shmuley Boteach: Pius XII: Saint or Moral Coward?






















More Blog Posts:  « First   Prev  1  2  3  Next   Last » 



Read more at www.huffingtonpost.com
 

CharlieO The Praying Parrot - Now I Lay Me Down To Sleep

Know Your Enemy (Part 48 - Population Control)

Know Your Enemy (Part 1 - Introduction)

DECEPTION (Introduction- Part 1)

Higher Fees At Some Banks

Higher Checking Account and ATM Fees

Amplify’d from www.wgal.com

Some Banks Could Start Charging Higher Fees

Consumers Should Educate Themselves, Ask Questions

Consumers should start bracing themselves for higher bank and ATM fees.

Two recent reforms that were supposed to help consumers have prompted the higher fees.

The first is that banks are no longer allowed to charge overdraft fees on debit card purchases without permission.

The second is a drastic reduction in interchange fees on debit cards, which are the fees banks charge merchants to use debit cards.

Conservative estimates indicate that banks will lose $10 billion to $12 billion because of the two changes.

To make up the difference, banks will start to increase their fees.

The bigger banks will lead the way with the new fees, including higher ATM fees for non-customers. Chase bank is already charging $5 in some places.

Consumers may also have to pay for any checking account. Bank of America is working on a pilot program that charges customers up to $12 per month based on their banking needs.

Once big national banks start charging these fees, smaller local banks may not be far behind.

To hold on to their money, consumers should educate themselves and start asking questions of their bank.

They should make sure they are aware of what fees they are paying now.

Consumers should also pay attention to any pieces of mail or communication from their bank about possible changes.

To save on ATM fees, consumers should make sure they get extra cash when making a purchase or get cash only at their bank's ATMs.
Read more at www.wgal.com