ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

The Hushed Topic of Religious Abuse

Interview: Author on Confronting the Hushed Topic of Religious Abuse

Amplify’d from www.christianpost.com

Interview: Author on Confronting the Hushed Topic of Religious Abuse

By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter
religious abuse

A victim of religious abuse, Jack Watts wants to sound the horn on what he believes is ignored in the church.

"Tragically, religious abuse occurs every day, and millions have stories bottled up inside them," he says in his new book, Recovering from Religious Abuse: 11 Steps to Spiritual Freedom

Yet "it's rare for church leaders to give more than lip service to religious abuse."

"Most routinely dismiss it as a minor issue. They're mistaken. It's a substantial problem," he asserts. "Even if you consider your abuse to be minor, it is an issue that needs to be addressed."

Watts is out to guide the many victims on a 91-day recovery program to help them restore purpose and meaning to their lives. Rather than live in fear, self-pity or disillusionment, God wants to replace that with a spirit of love, power and sound judgment, the author reassures victims.

After taking 25 years to fully recover from several abuses, Watts declares, "Helping people ... to recover is my purpose – my only purpose."

CP: First of all, how prevalent do you think religious abuse is, particularly in the U.S.?

Watts: Barna just finished going some research and in the research it showed that one third of people are completely unchurched. As a subcategory of that, they ask the question about people ever going to church and 37 percent of this 100 million people said that they stopped going completely because they had a negative experience. And that is a huge number. It’s as many people as are in the state of California and Canada. And of that, the people that have been religiously abused would be another subset. But it’s millions.

CP: Can you describe the scale of religious abuse – where on one side is the worst kind of abuse like sexual abuse and on the other side is what? Something minor as a comment

Watts: The continuum would be vast, you’re right. On the far end would be sexual abuse – like what happened to Elizabeth Smart, or the pedophile priest or what Bishop Eddie Long allegedly did to these young boys here in Atlanta. Following closely to that would be financial abuse – throw $20 on the plate and Jesus will give you $200. There’s a lot of that. When people ultimately recognize that that’s a con and a fraud, they become very disillusioned.

But the greatest number of religious abuse would be way more into the realm of people abusing their power and their religious authority to wound another person in the sense of … trying to obtain their own agenda; the people are essentially used, abused, shamed and discarded. Because it isn’t just you and I disagreeing about something, it’s more like “there’s something wrong with you,” “there’s something wrong with your relationship with the Lord.” And these people accept this wounding and they walk away, feeling shamed, disillusioned, angry, which turns into bitterness, resentment, and if they did this to me so they become hardened enough and the pain from it is so great that they begin or increase acting out behavior [such as] drinking; prescription drugs; pornography; extramarital affairs; overeating – huge one; overspending – equally huge; and they go down and they’re not happy. They become essentially part of the problem and they stay disillusioned and trapped in this for years, decades, sometimes the rest of their lives. The research says these people are so far away, we’re just going to categorize them as unchurched. This group is because of a negative experience.

CP: So the more obvious – sexual abuse – is always all over the media, but something like mental and emotional abuse seems to be underreported and no one really knows or talks about it as much…

Watts: Well, it hasn’t been identified. Period. To my knowledge, there are people that talk about abuse in the church. But to my knowledge, nobody has done what I’ve done and what I have done is said “OK, instead of just cursing the darkness, I’m going to light a match. And lighting the match is the 11 steps to recovery from religious abuse. Probably the best definition of religious abuse is if you feel like you have been abused, you have. Millions would say they have been. So they need to address this. The way that they address it is by systematically going through the problem, owning their part of it, and … breaking [from] “I was abused and God was a part of it.” That’s what they believe and that’s absolutely not true.

If you think about it, who understands being abused by the religious authorities more than Christ. Humiliated, spit upon, beaten, stripped naked, hung on the cross and murdered. That’s further than what the priests have done. So God understands this. He loves these people and nobody’s doing anything for them. Here I am, just little, old Jack Watts in Atlanta, Ga., raising the beacon, saying “OK, the Statue of Liberty where it says ‘give me your homeless, poor, tired, those who yearn to breathe free …” that’s what America took, it took the refuse and made the greatest nation of all time. Now, I think that if this huge group of people who have a relationship with the Lord can be reenergized, the potential of what they can do to help restore this nation are extraordinary.

Here he is, little, old Jack Watts, although I’ve got a good publisher, this is a Simon and Schuster book. Every Barnes & Noble in America has it (the book). So that’s a big deal. But you couldn’t find it in a LifeWay Christian bookstore nor am I even in their system.

CP: And why is that?

Watts: My guess is they don’t like that I’m calling them on their stuff. I am in the evangelical world the Nathan.

CP: There have been several books and studies about people liking Jesus but not the church. You emphasize in the book that this abuse comes from religious leaders and not from God or Jesus and that the victims should reconnect with God and recover their purpose. Let’s say they’re successful in building that relationship again with God but what about the church? How do they reconnect with a church after being hurt by one, since church is still very important to their faith life?

Watts: That’s a good question. That is an answer for them and how the Holy Spirit leads them. I can tell you right now that people that have been badly abused are never going to go back into a situation where someone’s going to abuse them again nor should they, nor do I recommend that. Getting reconnected with believers is something they will be able to do once they reconnect with the Lord himself. Plus, there are millions of people that they can help who have also been religiously abused in the same sense that “who’s the best person to help an alcoholic? Another alcoholic.” People that have worked the program and made strides at reconnecting and reestablishing an intimate relationship with the Lord … once you establish your relationship with the Lord, he’s very clear on what he wants you to do. I believe God’s in this, in what I’ve done. There is a future and a hope for good things and not bad, for people who are willing to reconnect moving forward.

CP: How big of a role do you think this has played in contributing to the negative image Christians have today?

Watts: It’s the No. 1 thing. When you ask somebody what they think of a believer, what is the first thing they say? They’re just a bunch of hypocrites. And this is part of the hypocrisy. There’s been so much abuse and the people who are abused are not cared for, they are shunned. Once shunned, they go off and are quickly forgotten. But they don’t forget the wounded. The wounded stay. So instead of leaving the 99 that are saved and going after the one that is lost, they’ve allowed the people that are lost to become so great that they now constitute 12 percent of the population. That’s huge.

CP: I don’t know if I missed this in the book, but can you recount the religious abuse you suffered starting with how you started in your walk with Christ?

Watts: Three of the four examples at the beginning of the book are me. The one about the kid that was molested by the pedophile priest was not me. I became a believer in 1964 through Campus Crusade for Christ. I had been raised Roman Catholic and pre-Vatican II. If you saw that movie “Doubt,” it’s about what priests and nuns were like back then and I mean to tell you that’s exactly what they were like. There was just constant terror in Catholicism. When I was 18, somebody from Campus Crusade came and said “God loves you.” I said “Why? Why would he love me? I never heard that before.” And I responded to it quickly and became a real enthusiastic Campus Crusader.

I got involved with a legalistic church and they were way more interested in people conforming to petty rules than anything else and that took a toll on me. When we split off from Campus Crusade in 1968 and we congregated in a little place called Isla Vista, Calif. It was a radical hippie community, right there in the middle of the Vietnam War, and we were raising the beacon for Christ. There were 10,000 hippies in one square mile. They ended up having more impact on us than I think we had on them. But this little group turned into a cult of authority. Breaking free of it was the hardest thing I ever had to do. I went through all of the shame and verbal abuse and having your family where …my kids couldn’t play with some of the friends and breaking off. It was awful. It took decades for us to completely get out and for me to reconnect with the Lord.

After I left and came back South, I started doing promotional work for large Christian ministries. I did the last mailing that Jim and Tammy Bakker ever did and that Norman Peale ever did. I worked for Pat Robertson’s group when he ran for president. So I saw what happened to the people within these organizations when they went against the narcissism of the leaders and it was not a pretty sight. All of a sudden I noticed there’s a pattern here.

As I learned to reconnect with the Lord personally and no longer participate in some of the things that these people did, I realized that this isn’t just good for me, I need to spell all this out because other people can benefit from my experience. If people can’t benefit from your experience then what use is it to have it?

CP: So what made you stick with Christianity? Why didn’t you just leave?

Watts: Well, I have a relationship with Christ. And he that denies me him will I deny. I’m not about to do that. I know that the Lord is the Lord. I wasn’t willing to go against Christ. Deep inside, once I had experienced God’s love, I knew that he loved me and even though I had all this stuff happen – I went through alcoholism and I have almost 18 years of sobriety now – I learned how to reconnect. And once I did, ... in my estimation I went through these experiences for a purpose. And the purpose is Recovering from Religious Abuse: 11 Steps to Spiritual Freedom.

CP: How long did it take for you to recover fully from this?

Watts: Twenty-five years.

CP: Have other people come to you with similar stories?

Watts: Oh my goodness. As soon as people look at this, everybody wants to talk. People want authenticity. They are not willing to just sit by and listen to sappy dribble that doesn’t really do anything. My experience is that if you give people reality, if you’re honest, then they respond. This book is rigorously honest. Beyond that. I would call it proactively forthright.

CP: We see a lot of recovery groups in churches – for alcohol or drug abusers, those who divorced and even sex addicts. Do you think a religious abuse recovery group is needed in the church?

Watts: Yeah.

CP: Would the church even be willing to have one?

Watts: That’s a good question. We’ll see. If people start doing this and you see lives changed, absolutely. I remember when I first started going to AA and I saw some of these older guys and they were unflappable and they were fun and interesting and strong. I like that. If you find Christian people who have been through the mill, and have stayed strong, then you find some really good people. It’s the weak people that are legalistic, not the strong ones.

CP: After all you’ve experienced and the stories you heard, what would you advise churches and church leaders as they lead their flocks whether it’s dozens or thousands?

Watts: Religious abuse doesn’t happen where there are dozens, often. It’s where the ministry becomes so big and so self-important that they get their message confused with the simplicity of the gospel. I think that some of these leaders, some of them won’t change because of the narcissism, personality disorder. But some of them just take one an enormous amount of arrogance and if enough people are willing to stand up to them, some of them will change. But my experience is that they surround themselves with [those] who are willing to look the other direction when they do appalling things. People who misuse his authority, that’s really taking the Lord’s name in vain, far more than deep profanity.

CP: How would you reassure these victims of abuse, about their purpose and God's love?

Watts: That’s what step 4 is. I recognize that God is not the abuser. Someone who misuses their authority is the abuser. God is good and can be trusted. He is who he says he is. That’s one complete step. It’s right there at the beginning after people say “my life is shipwrecked, I’ve gotten off course and even though I’m not the one that did this to me, I’m still the one that’s responsible for getting back on course. And I choose to believe that what God says about himself is true – that he is good and can be trusted. The abuse came from the abuser. God is not abusive.” The material points to what I alluded to earlier that Christ was abused by religious leaders. It was the religious establishment that crucified him, not the Romans.

CP: Would you like to add anything?

Watts: For people who are sick and tired of being sick and tired, there’s an option and they can recover and they can lead far more productive lives. God will meet them. They just have to take the initiative.

Read more at www.christianpost.com
 

Recovering from Religious Abuse

Amplify’d from www.christianpost.com

Author: Recovering from Religious Abuse

By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter

Millions of people have experienced religious abuse, claims one author. Yet the church has refused to care for, let alone acknowledge, the abused.

Jack Watts has an 11-step recovery program he says is the first one ever to be developed to help victims of religious abuse heal and reconnect with God.

After all, it is not God who is the abuser, but rather people who misuse their authority, Watts stresses in his recently released book, Recovering from Religious Abuse: 11 Steps to Spiritual Freedom.

A victim himself, Watts knows the devastating effects that religious abuse can have on a believer. Not only can they fall into destructive behaviors, such as alcoholism, but they could also abandon their relationship with God.

Unfortunately, religious abuse is "the least discussed" and even neglected topic in the church, he laments.

"This is part of the hypocrisy," he told The Christian Post in an interview. "There's been so much abuse and the people who are abused are not cared for. They are shunned. Once shunned, they go off and are quickly forgotten.

"So instead of leaving the 99 that are saved and going after the one that is lost, they've allowed the people that are lost to become so great that they now constitute 12 percent of the population."

Another indicator that Christians are ignoring the issue is the fact that his book cannot be found in one of the nation's largest Christian stores.

"This is a Simon and Schuster book. Every Barnes & Noble in America has it. So that’s a big deal. But you couldn’t find it in a LifeWay Christian bookstore nor am I even in their system," he said. "My guess is they don’t like that I’m calling them on their stuff. I am, in the evangelical world, the Nathan" (the prophet in the Old Testament who confronted King David about his sin).

Watts defines religious abuse as "the mistreatment of a person by someone in a position of spiritual authority, resulting in the diminishing of that person's sense of well-being and growth – both spiritually and emotionally."

He also defines it as "misuse of Scripture that harms a person's relationship with God."

To define it more simply, Watts told CP, "Probably the best definition of religious abuse is if you feel like you have been abused, you have."

"Millions say they have been."

Though sexual abuse in the church has been called out and reported, the Atlanta, Ga., author believes the more prevalent verbal and emotional abuse – the kind where you're often told "there’s something wrong with you" – has yet to be identified.

Gaining a warped view of God

Watts was raised a Roman Catholic. The movie "Doubt" came to his mind when describing what church was like at that time for him.

"It's (the movie) about what priests and nuns were like back then and I mean to tell you that's exactly what they were like. There was just constant terror in Catholicism," he recalled.

At the age of seven, Watts was preparing for his First Holy Communion. He, along with several of his peers, practiced going to the altar rail, kneeling down, holding their heads back, opening their mouths and sticking out their tongues for the Communion wafer.

Sounds simple enough. But he unpleasantly remembers being told harshly by the priest to close their mouths "immediately" after the wafer was placed on their tongues.

"You don't want to drop Jesus on the floor, do you?" the priest told the young kids. That would send them to hell, he said.

The day of Communion came and of course, one of his peers ended up letting the wafer drop from his mouth. That resulted in a slap across his face from the priest and the boy's mother apologizing to the priest for her son's carelessness.

"This episode solidified my fear of God or, more accurately, my terror of Him," Watts says in his book. "I saw God as cold, hateful, impersonal, petty, and mean-spirited."

It wasn't until he was 18 when someone from Campus Crusade for Christ told him that God loves him.

"Why? I never heard that before," he remembers questioning.

From then on, he became an enthusiastic born-again Christian and devoted churchgoer.

But he got involved with a legalistic church that was "way more interested in people conforming to petty rules than anything else." His pastor was "self-righteous" and "mean-spirited" and mainly concerned with setting sinners straight, including him.

Things didn't get any better for him when he and a group of fellow believers split off from Campus Crusade in 1968 to form their own group. The group ended up turning into a "cult of authority."

Later, he worked for televangelist Jim Bakker and his then wife, Tammy. The televangelist was soon caught in a sex and financial scandal.

It took 25 years for Watts to recover fully from all the religious abuse he suffered, he said.

The abuse never led him to ponder abandoning Christianity because he was convinced that "the Lord is the Lord." He was able to reconnect with the Lord and now wants to help countless others do the same.

Recovery

One of the crucial steps in Watts' recovery program is recognizing that God is not the abuser.

After the victim acknowledges, "My life is shipwrecked, I’ve gotten off course and even though I’m not the one that did this to me, I’m still the one that’s responsible for getting back on course," the next step is to "choose to believe that what God says about himself is true – that he is good and can be trusted. The abuse came from the abuser. God is not abusive.”

"If you think about it, who understands being abused by the religious authorities more than Christ? Humiliated, spit upon, beaten, stripped naked, hung on the cross and murdered. That’s further than what the priests have done," Watts told CP.

"So God understands this. He loves these people and nobody’s doing anything for them."

Though he suffered religious abuse for most of his life, Watts feels he went through the whole ordeal for a purpose – to help others recover.

"For people who are sick and tired of being sick and tired, there’s an option and they can recover and they can lead far more productive lives. God will meet them. They just have to take the initiative."

Read more at www.christianpost.com
 

Md. School Criticized for Prayer Event

Md. School Criticized for Prayer Event before Test

Amplify’d from www.christianpost.com

Md. School Criticized for Prayer Event before Test

By Stephanie Samuel|Christian Post Reporter

A Baltimore city school is at the center of a controversy for promoting and hosting a prayer service to encourage students to do well on state academic tests.

The Baltimore City Public School System (BCPS) and the American Civil Liberties Union are admonishing Tench Tilghman Elementary/Middle School for promoting a Saturday prayer service for students taking the Maryland School Assessment.

The Saturday prayer was also held inside the school building.

BCPS issued the statement, "It is not appropriate for public institutions of education to promote any particular religious practice."

The ACLU also denounced the event as a Constitutional violation of the separation of church and state.

The controversy began with a flier inviting faculty, students and parents to pray and “ask God to bless our school to pass the MSA.” The flyer also featured a Bible verse and phrases, “All things are possible,” and “Only Believe.”

ACLU attorney David Rocah criticized the Tench Tilghman flier for the prayer event by saying it was “conveying a religious message.” He also said the prayer meeting excludes those who do not believe that message.

“They send a message of exclusion to people who are not of the particular faith or of any faith at all,” Rocah told Baltimore local television channel WJZ-CBS.

The school’s principal, Jael Yon, and school officials said the goal of the meeting was not to exclude people or promote a religious view. The purpose of the community prayer event, they contended, was to motivate and encourage the students to do well.

The MSA is a test of reading and math achievement designed to meet the testing requirements of the federal “No Child Left Behind Act.” The test is given each year in early March in the subjects of reading and math for grades 3 through 8.

Jimmy Gittings, head of the Baltimore principals' union, said he supports Yon’s actions. Gittings also expressed that the removal of prayer from public schools nearly 50 years ago has led to a decline in the respect for teachers and administrators.

On the day of the March 5 event, WJZ reported that dozens of parents and children attended the service in support of the principal’s efforts.

BCPS officials, however, said they will be reviewing the details surrounding the prayer event to clarify school policy on future prayer events.

Read more at www.christianpost.com
 

Malaysian Detention of 35,000 Bibles

Malaysian Gov't Explains Detention of 35,000 Bibles

Amplify’d from www.christianpost.com

Malaysian Gov't Explains Detention of 35,000 Bibles

By Eric Young|Christian Post Reporter

The matter concerning the 35,000 Bibles presently being held by the Malaysian government is being resolved “amicably,” claimed the head of the Ministry of Home Affairs on Sunday.

And, contrary to what some have claimed, the detention of the books is not a consequence of their material, but rather the consequence of a pending court battle over the word “Allah” in a Catholic publication.

"In respect of the bibles from Port Klang and Kuching Port, the ministry have since sought and obtained the advice of the Attorney-General and the two matters are being resolved amicably with the parties concerned, based on this advice, in the next few days,” reported Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein in a statement.

Over the past week, Christian leaders in Malaysia have slammed the national government for barring the delivery of Bibles from overseas and for detaining at least 35,000 of them.

“Since March 2009, all attempts to import the Bible in Bahasa Malaysia, i.e. the Alkitab, whether through Port Klang or the Port of Kuching, have been thwarted,” reported the executive committee of the Christian Federation of Malaysia, which comprises the nation’s largest ecumenical, Evangelical, and Roman Catholic Christian bodies.

According to CFM, 5,000 copies of the Alkitab have been held by the Ministry of Home Affairs in Port Klang since March 2009. And on Thursday, the Christian umbrella group reported that 30,000 copies of the "Perjanjian Baru, Mazmur dan Amsal" – the "New Testament, Psalms and Proverbs" – are currently being withheld at the Port of Kuching in Sarawak state.

CFM further maintained that “tedious steps” have been taken after each incident to secure the release of the Bibles and that “nothing has been done by the authorities to ensure their release.”

“It would appear as if the authorities are waging a continuous, surreptitious and systematic program against Christians in Malaysia to deny them access to the Bible in Bahasa Malaysia,” CFM declared.

The home ministry, however, has attempted to justify its actions and insisted the matter over the detained Bibles is being resolved rationally to avoid it turning into an "emotive and polemic" issue.

It further called claims by some Christian groups, such as the National Evangelical Christian Fellowship, inaccurate and misleading.

"I urge all parties not to listen to wild allegations and speculations. As always, the ministry will act based on the law," the home minister said in his statement Sunday.

According to Hussein, the appeal that will determine the fate of the detained Bibles has yet been heard by the court. The appeal, he claimed, will “resolve the bigger issue of content one way or the other.”

In 2007, Malaysia’s Catholic Church filed a lawsuit against the government after the government threatened to revoke the printing permit of the faith-based Catholic Herald if it did not cease use of the word “Allah” in the Malay language section of its newspaper.

The government contends the word “Allah” is exclusively for Islam and that the use of “Allah” in Christian publications could confuse Muslims and make Christian ideas more appealing to them.

Church officials, however, argue that Allah is not exclusive to Islam because it is an Arabic word that existed before the religion. They say "Allah" has been used for centuries to mean "God" in Malay.

On Dec. 31, 2009, roughly two years after the suit was filed, a Supreme Court judge ruled on the side of the Malaysian Church, declaring that the word “Allah” is not exclusive to Islam and that the government’s Home Ministry is “not empowered” to ban non-Muslims from using the word.

The ministry, however, filed an appeal against the High Court decision in February 2010 and won a stay on the ruling pending the ruling of the Court of Appeal.

Despite the win, CFM claims that the national government had given the assurance that the Bible in Bahasa Malaysia, would be freely available, at least in the country’s two most populous states – Sabah and Sarawak.

“We call upon the Government to act now and prove their sincerity and integrity in dealing with the Malaysian Christian community on this and all other issues which we have been raising with them since the formation of the Christian Federation of Malaysia in 1985,” CFM expressed in a statement Thursday.

“As an immediate step, we insist upon the immediate release of all Bibles which have been detained,” it added.

According to the CIA World Factbook, 60.4 percent of Malaysia's 25.7 million people ascribe to Islam. Around 19.2 percent, meanwhile, is Buddhist, and 9.1 percent is Christian.

In general, Muslims enjoy special privileges in Malaysia as Islam is the dominant religion.

Read more at www.christianpost.com
 

'The Lost World of Genesis One'

Discovering Common Ground in 'The Lost World of Genesis One'

Amplify’d from spectrummagazine.org

Discovering Common Ground in 'The Lost World of Genesis One'

You are a materialist.  Actually, we all are.  From God-fearing young earth creationists to atheistic evolutionists, all of us assume a material ontology.  That is, we understand the existence of the universe from the perspective of how the material got here.  This perspective has been dominant since the time of the enlightenment and the rise of modernity when Sir Isaac Newton described a mechanistic universe ruled by a God who is the biggest, most skillful mechanical engineer in… well, in the universe. 
Prior to modernity, scientific understanding was vastly different from our own.  The ancients believed from a functional ontology.  In other words, they considered existence from the perspective of how things function in an ordered system and are useful to daily life.  These differences are vital to understanding ancient creation accounts and in particular the first chapter of Genesis.  At least, this is the contention of John H. Walton in his book The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate. 
Walton proposes understanding Genesis 1 from an ancient functional ontology rather than a modern material ontology.  This perspective is, “faithful to the context of the original audience and author, and one that preserves and enhances the theological vitality of this text.”  Astute readers will recognize that Walton’s exegesis of Genesis’ creation account presents a way to honor the biblical account of origins in an ancient and literal sense while at the same time allowing openness to the moving target that is the best and most current scientific consensus on origins.
Readers who interpret Genesis from a traditional fundamentalist perspective may be tempted to read into Walton’s exegesis that God was not involved in material origins.  Therefore, Walton clearly states, “Viewing Genesis 1 as an account of functional origins of the cosmos as temple does not in any way suggest or imply that God was uninvolved in material origins—it only contends that Genesis 1 is not that story.”  Furthermore, Walton specifies, “The point is not that the biblical text therefore supports an old earth, but simply that there is no biblical position on the age of the earth.”  However, whether one finds these assertions and Walton’s 18 well organized, succinctly-presented propositions persuasive will largely be determined by one’s preconceived assumptions and where one falls along the spectrum of perspectives on the origins debate. 
That this spectrum even exists is often unrecognized since the dominant poles of biblical-literalist, young earth creationists and atheistic dysteleological (without discernable purpose) evolutionists effectively encompass or exclude into their mutually reinforcing antagonistic orbits all other views (e.g. old earth/young life creationists, gap theorists, progressive creationists, creationary evolutionists, etc.).  Those of us inhabiting the no man’s land between the warring dominant poles will likely find Walton’s exploration of Genesis 1 from the ancient audience’s perspective intriguing and even faith building.  Others, in the more extreme positions, who still recognize the necessity of different viewpoints for diverse personalities and a more complete perspective may at least find that Walton’s book opens room for conversation.
Interpretations of Genesis can be broadly divided into two categories.  The “concordist” view attempts to read the ancient text in modern scientific terms.  This category includes young earth creationists, day-age creationists, and gap theory creationists, all of whom look for scientific information in the Genesis text to both answer modern questions and to establish divine inspiration.  The other “literary” view sees in the Genesis’ creation account literary devices which serve to make theological points rather than answer scientific questions.  Since Walton rejects scientific concordance, his book would seem to fall within the “literary” category.  In fact, he mentions that his interpretation of Genesis does not preclude a literary reading but could instead provide additional depth along side a literary perspective. 
However, in addition to scientific concordance, there are at least two other types of concordance to consider.  Theological concordance is held in common by all theistic readings of Genesis.  Historical concordance has generally been expected only with scientific concordance in so-called “concordist” views—until now.  Walton’s interpretation establishes common ground between the two broad interpretive categories.  Unlike strict concordist interpretations, Walton gives respect to the human author and the ancient context.  On the other hand, in distinction to some literary approaches, he affirms that the Israelites would have understood Genesis 1 in a literal historical sense and more importantly used the text as more than just literary/theological metaphor.
So, how does this novel approach to Genesis unfold?  Well, it might not be such a novel approach for those of us with an Adventist background. You see, Walton grounds the text on the firm foundation of the sanctuary and he further highlights the seventh-day of creation—heralding the present truth of the Sabbath.  He reads Genesis 1 as a cosmic temple inauguration culminating in God’s rest on day 7.  In this inauguration, the cosmos represents a functional temple or sanctuary.  God’s rest at the conclusion of the creation account is understood as God’s presence in a now functional and stable cosmos with the role of ruling, sustaining, and providentially guiding creation toward the fullness of the Kingdom of God through a process of ongoing creation.
In Walton’s view, the first three days of creation are about assigning the fundamental functions of life:  time, weather, and food.  Days four through six then describe the sequential installation of functionaries within each of these functional realms.  At the end of each day’s activity, God’s pronouncement “It was good” is often interpreted as a statement of completed perfection with moral implications.  However, given this functional framework, God’s statement could be interpreted, “it was working well.”  “By naming the functions and installing the functionaries, and finally by deity entering his resting place, the temple comes into existence–it is created in the inauguration ceremony.”
Then comes Sabbath.  Walton’s view of Genesis 1 provides a significant contribution to our theology of the Sabbath.  At least it will for some.  He writes, “In the traditional view that Genesis 1 is an account of material origins day seven is mystifying.  It appears to be nothing more than an afterthought with theological concerns about Israelites observing the Sabbath—an appendix, a postscript, a tack on.”  This critique certainly applies to fundamentalists outside the Seventh-day Adventist tradition.  For example, a slick multimedia presentation on the days of creation at the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky ends abruptly after the sixth day with a blank screen and an awkward silence echoing the absent climax—the celebratory fulfillment of creation on day seven.  In distinction, traditional Adventists, even with a deeply ingrained materialistic understanding of the Genesis creation account, see the Sabbath as quite literally a central command to honor God as creator—anything but a tack on.
However, Walton also speaks to this traditional Adventist view of the Sabbath as an arbitrary command to memorialize God as creator.  In this view, God’s example and later command of rest is the reason for the Sabbath observance and we therefore observe Sabbath by ceasing from our work as God did.  Walton responds, “God is not asking us to imitate his Sabbath rest… Instead, he is asking us to recognize that he is at the controls, not us.”  He goes on to stress that, “Sabbath isn’t the sort of thing that should have to be regulated by rules.  It is the way we acknowledge that God is on the throne, that this world is his world, that our time is his gift to us.”  The meaning of the Sabbath is expanded through an understanding of divine rest as God inhabiting the cosmos and calling us forward toward a unified future in which, as E.G. White puts it, “one pulse of harmony and gladness beats through the vast creation.”  In this view, the material resources of creation are anything but natural and are not just for us and our exploitation.  Rather, the material world deserves our care and respect since it is an integral part of God’s whole sacred sanctuary. 
Walton’s view of the sanctuary is remarkably similar in substance if not in scope to the Adventist view of the earthly sanctuary as a copy of the true sanctuary in heaven.  However, rather than boxing God the Father and Jesus within a literal structure in heaven, moving from room to room on pre-specified dates, this cosmic view expands our view of the sanctuary and affirms a more intimate association of the Triune God with all of creation.  Walton provides a guided tour of the sanctuary, or temple as he calls it, revealing a movement from chaos to order and demonstrating that the familiar sanctuary furnishings which Adventists correctly see pointing forward to Jesus and ultimately to God in heaven also send us back to God and the installation of the functions of life on earth during the days of creation. 
Admittedly, Walton’s perspective on distinctive Adventist themes such as Sabbath, sanctuary, and creation is at variance with traditional Adventist beliefs.  Some will see this as a faith-challenging weakness while others will find the fresh perspective a horizon-expanding strength.  Similarly, depending on one’s perspective, the book’s distinctive strength may also be its greatest weakness—the singular focus on Genesis 1.  In a very brief section on Genesis 2 and Romans 5, Walton acknowledges the understanding of a literal Adam and Eve in both old and new testaments.  He writes, “Whatever evolutionary processes led to the development of animal life, primates, and even prehuman hominids, my theological convictions lead me to posit substantive discontinuity between that process and the creation of the historical Adam and Eve.  Rather than cause-and-effect continuity, there is material and spiritual discontinuity, though it remains difficult to articulate how God accomplished this.”  His concluding understatement offers a challenging direction for those inclined to pick up where Walton trails off and continue re-discovering Genesis into chapter 2 and beyond.
There is much more in the book worthy of discussion including:  Walton’s definitions of original Hebrew terms, explorations of other ancient creation stories, and opinions on science education.  On these topics and more, Walton’s book is a unique combination of academic insight and accessible writing.  Whether or not there is ultimately agreement that Genesis 1 is best understood as a description of functional rather than material creation, The Lost World of Genesis One clears new ground for launching further theological exploration, discovers common ground for everyone to join in conversation, and creates functional ground in which to sink deep roots of faith.
Brenton Reading writes from Shawnee, KS where he lives with his wife Nola and their three children.  He is a pediatric interventional radiologist at Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, MO.
Read more at spectrummagazine.org
 

ISIS: Crisis May Reach Chernobyl Level

ISIS: Crisis May Reach Chernobyl Level Disaster

Amplify’d from www.prisonplanet.com

BBC News

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

The US-based Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) has said it agrees with the assessment of France’s Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) that the incident at Fukushima should be classified as level 6 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), one below Chernobyl.

Following a number of explosions and a fire at the plant which released dangerous levels of radiation, ISIS said the situation had “worsened considerably” and was now closer to a level 6 event. “It may unfortunately reach a level 7,” it added.

Read more at www.prisonplanet.com
 

Potassium Iodide Works

Potassium Iodide Works: Rare Agreement Between Alternative Health and the FDA

Amplify’d from www.prisonplanet.com

Brandon Turbeville

Activist Post

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

With the tragedy in Japan continuing to unfold as we speak, most news coverage has focused on the death toll resulting from the earthquake and tsunami. Some coverage has also been given to the meltdown of the Japanese nuclear reactors. However, there has been very little discussion in the mainstream media of the attempted cover-up of problems at seventeen reactors that malfunctioned in 2003, or that the radioactive particles from the latest full-blown catastrophe could soon be reaching the western United States as early as March 25th.

Much of the independent media, on the other hand, has been covering the wider issues and, as a result, a discussion has been generated about the means by which we can protect ourselves against such radiation. In this regard, there has been much conjecture as to whether KI (Potassium Iodide) can protect against radiation poisoning, as well as whether or not KI poses enough significant health risks as to preclude its usage.

First, in regards to whether or not KI is useful in protecting against radiation, the answer is Yes. KI is recognized by most professionals ranging from natural health promoters such as Natural News to those who are generally the enemy of all things natural and wholesome, the FDA.
The Health Ranger, Mike Adams of Natural News, writes:

If you leave the fate of your own health up to a bunch of state bureaucrats, you’re a fool. Everybody needs to have some potassium iodide on hand to protect themselves from radiation poisoning caused by nuclear accidents or nuclear terrorism. [emphasis added]

He continues in the same article:

Never mind that experts say the over-the-counter potassium iodide pills are the cheapest and easiest way to prevent radiation poisoning – especially in children – in case of a nuke attack. [emphasis added] Source

And:

Last year, a report commissioned by Congress recommended that everyone under 40 near a nuclear power plant should have the pills on hand. [emphasis added] Source

The FDA itself actually says something similar.   The FDA released a document entitled, Guidance on Potassium Iodide as a Thyroid Blocking Agent in Radiation Emergencies, the purpose of which was to provide guidance to other Federal agencies such as the EPA and the NRC, as well State and Local agencies, regarding the safety and efficacy of using KI in the event of a nuclear emergency where radioactive iodine is released into the environment.
Another FDA document which discussed KI dosages and recommended duration of use can be found here, as well as the FAQ section on the FDA’s own website regarding KI which can be found here. This document and the FAQ section clearly demonstrate that the FDA recognizes KI as a radioprotective agent. Indeed, the FDA expressly states:

The effectiveness of KI as a specific blocker of thyroid radioiodine uptake is well established. When administered in the recommended dose, KI is effective in reducing the risk of thyroid cancer in individuals or populations at risk for inhalation or ingestion of radioiodines.

KI works by flooding the thyroid with non-radioactive Iodine which thereby prevents the uptake of the radioactive Iodine molecules. These molecules are then released through the urine. That being said, it should be noted that KI is not a general protection agent against radiation. KI ONLY prevents the thyroid from absorbing radioactive iodine. Therefore, one should not look at KI as a general “sun-block” version of radiation protection.
There are also many risks associated with KI according to the FDA. Although researchers continue to debate the severity of these risks, possible dangers include:
  • Acne
  • Rashes
  • Allergic Reactions
  • Swelling of the Glands (similar to Mumps)
  • Runny Eyes
  • Runny Nose
  • Impotence
  • Sore Teeth and Gums
  • Metallic Taste in Mouth
  • Swelling of the Salivary Glands
In more serious cases, according to Mike Adams, as a result of deluging an otherwise normal thyroid gland with KI, the result may be the inhibition of the gland’s production of thyroxine. There has also been some question (although its widely debated) as to whether or not KI in abnormal amounts can actually facilitate the growth of cancer.
Most of these side effects manifest themselves as a result of the fact that humans need just the right amount of KI for optimal thyroid function. In short, more is not better . . .  and neither is less.
In the event of a radioactive emergency, none of these side effects are severe enough to preclude KI from being used. The dangers of radioactive exposure far outweigh the side effects of short term KI treatment. Nevertheless, KI should only be used in the event of an emergency and not merely as a regular dietary supplement.

Keep in mind, a proven safe and effective means of natural iodine consumption is Kelp. In fact, your body absorbs iodine better from Kelp (a natural source) than it does from KI supplements. It is also much safer, especially in regards to the thyroid gland. In reference to Kelp, Earl Mindell, author of Vitamin Bible for the Twenty-First CenturyPotassium Iodide Works: Rare Agreement Between Alternative Health and the FDA  , writes that “Kelp has a normalizing effect on the thyroid gland. In other words, thin people with thyroid trouble can gain weight by using kelp, and obese people can lose weight with it.”

In the incredibly rare event where natural health and government health overlap in agreement, as in the case of the protective benefits of potassium iodide against nuclear radiation exposure, it duly requires our added level of attention.

Please leave your comments about your knowledge and preparation against the growing concern of radioactive exposure in the U.S. and elsewhere.

Read more at www.prisonplanet.com
 

Haarp Weapon Cause Japanese Earthquake?

Amplify’d from ohlundonline.blogspot.com


Did Haarp Weapon Cause Japanese Earthquake?

Haec locutus sum vobis, ut in me pacem habeatis; in mundo pressuram habetis, sed confidite, ego vici mundum. (John 16:33)

Benjamin Fulford said the earthquake attack on Japan originated in New Mexico and Nevada, U.S.

Will Iran be the next target?

Could the horrific earthquake-weapon HAARP, have created the 10 meter Tsunami along much of Japan’s coastline?

Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez accused earlier the U.S. for having artificially created the Haiti earthquake.

But why would any government willfully cause the death and destruction of people?

Well, this is more about rogue and satanic elements within governments.

We live in the final days before our God Jesus Christ Returns.

I personally believe Christ's second coming will be in 2019.

We are about to enter the seven year tribulation period.

Judas Iscariot was the Antichrist of his time.

But was Judas Iscariot Jewish?

No, he wasn't.

Genesis chapter 34 tells the story when Dinah - the daughter of Leah and the sister of the twelve Patriarchs of Israel - was raped.

The sons of Jacob grieved and were angry for what had befallen their sister.

But it was Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brothers, who each took his sword and came boldly upon the city of Shechem and killed all the males there.

Now, when Jacob was about to die, he prophesied over each of his 12 sons.

Jacob said about Simeon and Levi: "Simeon and Levi are brethren; instruments of cruelty are in their habitations. O my soul, come not thou into their secret; unto their assembly, mine honour, be not thou united: for in their anger they slew a man, and in their selfwill they digged down a wall. Cursed be their anger, for it was fierce; and their wrath, for it was cruel: I will divide them in Jacob, and scatter them in Israel", see Genesis 49:5 - 7.

The prophetic word of God through Jacob proved true.

God did in fact both divide the tribes of Simeon and Levi, and scatter them among Israel.

But, significantly, the way it happened for each tribe was different.

The tribe of Simeon, because of their lack of faithfulness, was effectively dissolved as a tribe, and absorbed into the tribal area of Judah.

Judas Iscariot came from the town Scariot within Judah, where people from the tribe of Simeon were located.

The tribe of Levi was also scattered, but because of the faithfulness of this tribe during the rebellion of the golden calf, see Exodus 32:26-28, the tribe was scattered as a blessing throughout all tribes and the whole nation of Israel.

Moses was the most prominent Levite, and a righteous man.

He had no prejudices, and married a black woman.

When Moses was angry he killed an Egyptian who had wronged a Jew.

Moses bears the characteristic of a good Priest: someone who loves his family and someone who kills bad people.

The tribe Simeon was scattered within Judah, but the tribe of Levi within all of Israel.

Both tribes were scattered, Levi as a blessing but Simeon as a curse.

Most of the tribe of Levi moved to Europe.

The tribe of Simeon also moved to Europe, specifically to Ireland.

That is why I believe the Antichrist is of Irish descent.

The Jewish people has suffered for 2.000 years, because people wrongly believed Judas Iscariot was Jewish.

I surely hope no one will demonize the Irish people in the same way the Jewish people has suffered, because Antichrist's family originated from Ireland.

"Quia non est nobis colluctatio adversus sanguinem et carnem sed adversus principatus, adversus potestates, adversus mundi rectores tenebrarum harum, adversus spiritalia nequitiae in caelestibus", Ephesians 6:12.
Read more at ohlundonline.blogspot.com