ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Birther Debate Alive Across U.S.

Amplify’d from www.westernjournalism.com

Birther Debate Alive Across U.S.

The opening of 2011 state legislative sessions has been accompanied by a spate of birther-related bills, the clearest indication yet that the controversy surrounding President Barack Obama’s place of birth will continue to simmer throughout his reelection campaign.

Lawmakers in at least 10 states have introduced bills requiring presidential candidates to provide some form of proof that they are natural-born citizens, a ballot qualification rule designed to address widespread rumors on the right that Obama was not born in the United States.

The notion that Obama does not meet constitutional qualifications to be president has dogged him since the early stages of the 2008 race, despite his campaign’s posting online his certificate of live birth in the state of Hawaii.

The birther controversy resurfaced in recent weeks when newly elected Hawaii Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie, a friend of Obama’s parents, promised to investigate the issue and finally put to rest rumors that he was born in Kenya or Indonesia. Abercrombie later backtracked, citing the state’s privacy laws.

So far, the conservative conspiracy theorists who have pushed national media campaigns and numerous legal challenges questioning the president’s eligibility have met little success.

At the state level, however, the issue continues to fester. This year’s bills, if passed, would create a requirement for presidential campaigns to prove candidates’ place of birth, a proviso that sponsors say would finally clear up the matter.

Read More: By ANDY BARR, Politico

Related posts:

Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
Read more at www.westernjournalism.com
 

Darpa Gets Big Bucks for ‘Cyber Tech’ (Whatever That Means)

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

Darpa Gets Big Bucks for ‘Cyber Tech’ (Whatever That Means)

The Pentagon’s blue-sky research agency will get an infusion of new cash to research new cybertechnologies, according to the just-released fiscal 2012 defense budget request. Sound vague and undefined? That’s because it is.

Out of the $553 billion base budget, Darpa gets half a billion in research money “to invest in cyber technologies.” There’s absolutely no elaboration in the Pentagon’s 129-page budget document, which you can read here. In total, the request includes $1.3 billion for the “training of cyber analysts” — apparently outside of Darpa — and boosts cash to the Defense Information Security Agency for “cyber identity, monitoring and enforcement.”

Darpa representatives have yet to return messages requesting clarification. But the unspecified cash for Darpa is as much as the long-term budget plan devotes, over four years, to building a Joint Operations Center at U.S. Cyber Command, the new military command that’s supposed to protect the military’s networks.

Darpa’s plans in cyberspace don’t hurt for lack of ambition. In August, it released a new program, called CINDER, to sniff out “insider threats” to military computer systems by hunting for anomalous behavior from people authorized to access them. The insider threat question has been a huge one within the military since Pfc. Bradley Manning allegedly passed thousands of confidential documents to WikiLeaks.

Even beyond insider threat detection, in January, Darpa began a “Cyber Genome” project to create the digital equivalent of DNA or fingerprints, in order to determine irrefutably who might be behind a cyberattack. But some of its other efforts have hit snags. A $17 billion push to create a National Cyber Range to test out cyberattacks and defenses isn’t proceeding fast enough for some in the military; some agencies want to produce their own mini-ranges in the interim.

At a Pentagon briefing this afternoon for the release of the budget, neither Defense Secretary Robert Gates nor Robert Hale, the Pentagon comptroller, elaborated on what the new Darpa money will actually finance. But both held out the new money as an example of how the budget takes a far-sighted approach to funding emerging threats, even as it barely increases total funding for the military from its request last year, which Congress has yet to pass. But will Congress really be willing to throw half a billion at Darpa just because the Pentagon puts the buzzword “cyber” next to a vague research requirement?

Photo: U.S. Air Force

See Also:

Read more at www.wired.com
 

Feds Seize 18 More Domains in Piracy Crackdown

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

Feds Seize 18 More Domains in Piracy Crackdown

The U.S. government seized 18 more internet domains Monday, bringing to at least 119 the number of seizures following the June commencement of the so-called “Operation in Our Sites” anti-piracy program.

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement seizure, in honor of Valentine’s Day, targeted sites hawking big-name brands like Prada and Tiffany & Co.

Customs agents had bought counterfeit bracelets, earrings, handbags, necklaces, rings, sunglasses, wallets and watches with “brand names” from Burberry to Nike and Timberland, the government said.

“These counterfeits represent a triple threat by delivering shoddy, and sometimes dangerous, goods into commerce, by funding organized criminal activities and by denying Americans good-paying jobs. HSI and our partners at the IPR Center will continue to work together to keep counterfeit products off our streets,” ICE Director John Morton said in a statement.

The seizures are based on the same law the government invokes to seize brick-and-mortar drug houses, for example. When it comes to internet domain seizures, the U.S. government has jurisdiction over top-level domains such as .com, .org and .net.

The latest seizures, which were done without advance warning to the sites, came nearly two weeks after the government seized 10 domains connected to pirating professional sports video streams.

Preet Bharara, the Manhattan U.S. attorney, blamed such sports broadcasting piracy for “raising prices for tickets and pay-per-view events.”

Meanwhile, in November, the federal government targeted 82 websites, many bartering in counterfeited goods like scarves and golfing gear. In June, when the seizure program was announced, the government took down nine sites that distributed pirated motion pictures.

The government has released a list of the 18 sites taken down.

See Also:

Read more at www.wired.com
 

House Extends Key Patriot Act Provisions

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

House Extends Key Patriot Act Provisions









The House voted Monday to extend to December three expiring provisions of the Patriot Act spy legislation.


The measure’s passage, by a 275-144 vote, was expected. The three provisions are expiring at month’s end. Rather than seriously debate or alter them, the House punted — the third failure by Congress in more than a year to address the law’s controversial issues.


The measure now goes before the Senate, which is likely to follow the House’s course on legislation that was hastily adopted following the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.


Here are the expiring provisions the House adopted:


• The “roving wiretap” provision allows the FBI to obtain wiretaps from a secret intelligence court, known as the FISA court (for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act), without identifying the target or what method of communication is to be tapped.


• The “lone wolf” measure allows FISA court warrants for the electronic monitoring of a person for whatever reason — even without showing that the suspect is an agent of a foreign power or a terrorist. The government has said it has never invoked that provision, but the Obama administration said it wanted to retain the authority to do so.


• The “business records” provision allows FISA court warrants for any type of record, from banking to library to medical, without the government having to declare that the information sought is connected to a terrorism or espionage investigation.


Illustration: American Civil Liberties Union


See Also:


Read more at www.wired.com
 

RAW VIDEO: Mayor Linda Thompson Acknowledges Crowd From Window - Video - WGAL The Susquehanna Valley


IMAGES: Snowball Thrown At Mayor's Window As Crowd Chants For Her To Step Down - Photos - WGAL The Susquehanna Valley


POPE TO BE TOLD CATHOLIC CHURCH IN IRELAND IS NEARING COLLAPSE

Amplify’d from reform-network.net

Catholic Church nearing collapse here, Pope told

Reuters

REPORT: Cardinal O’Malley

By Cormac Murphy

Monday February 14 2011

THE Pope is to be officially warned that the Irish Catholic Church is on the verge of national collapse, it was revealed today.

The caution is to be contained in a report submitted to Pope Benedict XVI by Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the archbishop of Boston.

The Pope appointed Cardinal O’Malley last May as “apostolic visitor” to the Dublin archdiocese in the wake of the damaging Murphy and Ryan reports into clerical child abuse.

The Vatican said his job was to “explore more deeply questions concerning the handling of cases of abuse and the assistance owed to the victims”.

He was also asked to “monitor the effectiveness of and seek possible improvements to the current procedures for preventing abuse’.’

Reports today revealed Cardinal O’Malley gave a commitment at a private meeting with the Catholic Priests’ Association that he would relay to the Pope the true extent of the difficulties facing the Catholic Church here.

The Cardinal took part in in-depth discussions with the association, according to Redemptorist priest Fr Tony Flannery.

The Boston archbishop believes the church in Ireland has at most 10 years to avoid being completely marginalised, Fr Flannery told the annual meeting of The People of God, a lay reform group.

While Cardinal O’Malley was born in the United States, he is a proud Irish-American who frequently talks of his Irish heritage. Part of his responsibilities included meeting with the victims of abuse in the Dublin diocese.

He visited Dublin at the beginning of December and returned in January and February to meet with the victims.

As part of the mission, the former archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor, visited the archdiocese of Armagh before Christmas.

In addition, Archbishop of Toronto Christopher Collins and Archbishop of Ottowa Terrence Prendergast are also visiting the archdioceses of Cashel and Tuam respectively.

The Vatican says the delegation is to have completed its mission by May this year. It has still not revealed whether the results of the apostolic visitors would be made public.

COMMENT: Holding the man at the top responsible is the appropriate organizational response. Applying this basic management principle one could make a good argument that Pope Benedict should do the right thing and resign.

Peoria monsignor files police report charging 86-year-old woman with stealing $35,622.16 from St. Casimir’s Altar and Rosary Society
Read more at reform-network.net
 

Peoria monsignor files police report charging 86-year-old woman with stealing $35,622.16 from St. Casimir’s Altar

Amplify’d from reform-network.net
Peoria monsignor files police report charging 86-year-old woman with stealing $35,622.16 from St. Casimir’s Altar and Rosary Society

Over money questions, pastor threatens to take administrator to court

by Tom Gallagher on Feb. 08, 2011

A classic dispute has officially commenced by the Diocese of Peoria, St. Michael the Archangel Church, located in Streator, Illinois, and a rosary society at legal odds over the ownership of $35,000.

Monsignor John Prendergast, pastor of St. Michael the Archangel Church, after giving written notice to the rosary society, filed a report with the local police charging an 86-year old, Dorothy Swital, with stealing the funds. Ms. Swital is more than ready for this legal fight.

The Rev. Monsignor John Prendergast, pastor of St. Michael the Archangel Church, confirmed he filed a report with the Streator Police Department accusing her [Ms. Swital] of stealing $35,622.16 in two certificate of deposit accounts formerly in the name of St. Casimir’s Altar and Rosary Society.

He believes that money belongs to the church.

Swital, the 86-year old president of the society, does not see it that way.

She said the non-profit organization always has operated independent of the parish. The money was raised by the group through fundraisers and not through church collections.

Prior to filing the police report, Prendergast sent the following letter to Ms. Swital. Below are the opening paragraphs of the letter.

Dated:January 28, 2011

Subject: Missing funds from St. Casimir Parish

Dear Mrs. Swital,

The purpose of this letter is to inform you of our intent to file a police report concerning your unauthorized withdrawal of two Certificates of Deposits held at Streator Home Building and Loan Association that were the property of St. Casimir Roman Catholic Congregation and their subsequent deposit in an account other than that of St. Casimir Catholic Congregation of Streator.

According to bank statements from Streator Home Building and Loan Association, on October 27, 2010 you closed St. Casimir’s Altar and Rosary certificate of deposit account xxxxxxxxxx* and received a $19,938.99 check written to “St. Casimir’s Altar & Rosary Society” and, at the same time, you closed a second St. Casimir’s Altar and Rosary Society certificate of deposit account xxxxxxxxxx* and received a $15,683.17 check written to “St. Casimir’s Altar & Rosary Society.” You subsequently deposited both checks, totaling $35,622.16, in an account which did not belong to St. Casimir Church, the owners of the funds.

The letter continues:

If the funds are not returned by Friday, February 4, 2011, I will file a police report on the missing funds along with the bank records showing that you withdrew the funds and subsequently deposited the funds in an account other than St. Casimir Church.

COMMENT: Maybe the monsignor filed the police report after drinking too much altar wine. Even without knowing the details, I’ve got my $35K  bet on the lady as the eventual winner in this important Midwest legal drama.

Read more at reform-network.net
 

First Tunisia, then Egypt. Is it Algeria's turn?


First Tunisia, then Egypt. Is it Algeria's turn?

Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.com
From Time magazine:



First Tunisia, then Egypt. Now it could be Algeria's turn to free itself from autocratic rule. Fearing a full-blown uprising like those that have collapsed both the Tunisian and Egyptian regimes in one month, government officials in the huge North African country scrambled on Monday, Feb. 14, to short-circuit an accelerating movement of street protests, a display of antigovernment sentiment that would have been unthinkable until recently. Algerian Foreign Minister Mourad Medelci told France's Europe 1 radio station Monday morning that his country's 19-year state-of-emergency laws would be revoked within days, ending tight censorship and lifting a ban on political demonstrations. "In the coming days," Medelci said, the emergency regulations would be "a thing of the past," giving way to "complete freedom of expression within the limits of the law." He then added, "Algeria is not Tunisia or Egypt."

That statement might be wishful thinking on the part of Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika's government. Exactly one month after mammoth protests drove Tunisian President Zine el Abidine Ben Ali into exile in Saudi Arabia, ending 23 years of autocratic rule, and three days after the Egyptian revolt drove President Hosni Mubarak from office after nearly 30 years, some Algerian youth are primed for an uprising of their own. (See TIME's exclusive photos of the dramatic action in Tahrir Square.)

About 2,000 demonstrated in the capital, Algiers, on Feb. 12, and another protest is planned for Saturday, Feb. 19. In an echo of Tunisia's revolution slogan, Saturday's Algerian protesters chanted, "Bouteflika dégage!" (Bouteflika, get out!), and some carried Egyptian and Tunisian flags, an unsubtle warning to the government that it might be unable to stop the protesters' momentum. Just as Cairo's Tahrir Square became the nexus of the Egyptian people's show of power, Algeria's protest movement has chosen as its gathering point the May 1 Square in the center of Algiers. Thousands of riot police scuffled with the protesters, and cell-phone videos like this one posted on YouTube show police dragging demonstrators away from the scene.

With Egypt and Tunisia having ousted their leaders, the similarities between those two countries and Algeria seem increasingly clear, and Bouteflika, 73, appears more isolated regionally, as one of North Africa's last remaining despots of his generation. Bouteflika has ruled Algeria for 11 years, and in 2008 he changed the constitution — just as Mubarak and Ben Ali had done — to allow himself to remain in power until he dies. The following year, he won his third term — in a presidential election boycotted by many opposition parties — with more than 90% of the votes, a figure similar to the reported landslide Mubarak won just six months later. (See how Egypt's future could change as the military takes over.)

There are other parallels among the three countries. Just as Mubarak forged close ties with the U.S. — and was rewarded with billions of dollars in U.S. military aid — so too has Bouteflika cultivated relationships with European and American officials by waging a battle against Islamic militants and arguing that Algerian-based terrorist groups would be far more dangerous in his absence. The terrorism threat is real enough. Al-Qaeda's North African offshoot, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), was founded in Algeria in 2007 as an outgrowth of the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat, which has long fought against Bouteflika's secular policies. AQIM has kidnapped numerous foreigners around the region.

But none of that is of any interest to those Algerians rooting for the protesters, whose message is increasingly geared to unseating Bouteflika. After Mubarak resigned on Friday, Algeria's best-known cartoonist, Ali Dilem — against whom Islamic militants once issued a fatwa calling for his execution — posted on a blog a cartoon featuring an Algerian soccer fan standing under a scoreboard reading, "Egypte 1, Algerie 0," and holding a sign that says, "We have to equalize" — a reference to the two nations' bitter soccer rivalry. For weeks, Algerian youth have been posting videos from Tahrir Square on Facebook and calling for similar protests at home. (See where Abdelaziz Bouteflika ranks in TIME's top 10 autocrats in trouble.)

Despite the fervor on the streets of Algeria, Western intelligence agencies believe that Algerians, exhausted from years of civil war, might be unwilling to face a potentially bloody assault should they revolt against their government. The country suffered massive losses in a war between Islamic groups and government forces that lasted from 1991 to 2002 and killed about 200,000 people. The conventional wisdom of intelligence agencies has proved of little use this past month, however: just a few weeks ago, Western intelligence agencies said there was only a small chance that Mubarak would be driven from office by the huge protests in Cairo's Tahrir Square. Now we know how wrong they were.



Source:http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2048975,00.html

Read more at thetruthandthetruthalone.blogspot.com
 

Members of Congress Press Sebelius on Moral Conscience Law

Amplify’d from www.christianpost.com

Members of Congress Press Sebelius on Moral Conscience Law

By Stephanie Samuel|Christian Post Reporter

Members of Congress questioned the proposed plan by the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to repeal regulations that allow health care workers to opt out of medical procedures for moral conscience reasons.

In a recent letter signed by 46 members of Congress, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was asked to explain why her department is seeking to repeal conscience protections for health care workers. House members cited two cases where medical workers were put in situations where they were being forced to go against their moral and religious conscience.

“Both of these situations are precisely the type of discrimination against health care providers that federal and conscience statutes were meant to redress,” the letter chided.

The lawmakers expressed strong support for moral conscience regulations and state strong opposition for “any action that would undermine or eliminate the responsibility of HHS to enforce conscience laws that have been enacted by Congress for nearly four decades.”

One of the two cases cited in the letter was that of registered New York nurse Catherina DeCarlo. DeCarlo alleged that she was forced by Mt. Sinai Hospital to participate in the abortion of an unborn baby against her moral and religious conscience.

The other case was that of two nursing students who were being required to sign a letter committing to assisting in abortions in order to be considered for Vanderbilt University’s obstetrical and gynecological care program.

Alliance Defense Fund served as legal counsel in both cases.

“Medical professionals should not be punished for holding to their beliefs, and they should not be forced to perform abortions against their conscience,” commented Matt Bowman, ADF legal counsel.

Vanderbilt University amended its application process soon after the ADF filed a complaint. In the case of DeCarlo, the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of her federal lawsuit. She is currently awaiting an ongoing investigation by HHS as the means to defend her federally protected rights while her New York state lawsuit continues.

Bowman said the group has filed a motion to intervene in the federal investigation because the Department of Justice is dragging its feet because the current administration wants to dismantle the regulations that would investigate violations of the moral conscience law for pro-life medical workers commonly known as the Church Amendment.

The Congressional letter found that the HHS Department is seeking to implement regulations that would counter the Church Amendment “as early as January 31, 2011 and no later than March 1, 2011.”

The Christian Post contacted the HHS department for comments on the letter, but was unable to reach department officials before the close of the business day.

The letter demands that Sebelius answer questions regarding the nature of its plans. The letter pointedly asks the secretary if the HHS intends to modify or rescind the December 2008 regulations implementing the conscience laws.

The letter also asks if the HHS has been verifying if federally-funded health care providers have been in compliance with the conscience laws.

The letter was issued Friday and signed by House members including Reps. Ron Paul (R-Texas), Mike Pence (R-Ind.) and Bill Shuster (R- Pa.). The HHS Secretary is asked to provide answers by next Monday.

Read more at www.christianpost.com