ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Operation WAKE UP!!!!!

byCapri Adirim

YOUR SLAVE NAME



When the parents or parent has a child in a hospital, the nurses bring you a REGISTRATION OF LIVE BIRTH/registrar. The mother fills it out. The mother and or father name the child. This is or was the lawful Christian name or surname & given name.



The State or Province take that name & CAPITALIZE it. If the state or province is in debt, the name is entirely capitalized, if the state or province is not then just the last name is capitalized.



Parents name the child: John, Doe.Gov't copies the name: DOE, John. (Non bankrupt gov't).



Gov't copies the name: DOE, JOHN. (bankrupt gov't).john = bathroom, doe = female deer.John, Doe = words capitalized on by parents to create a label or name.



Freeman-on-the-land.DOE, John = Officer or agent of the Gov't who recieved the benefit of citizenSHIP.



Maritime Admiralty law. You now reside on the corporateship. RESIDENT. PASSPORT, passing from the port to another ship. PORT AUTHORITIES anyone?



DOE, JOHN or JOHN DOE = slave, no more God given rights just priviledges granted & taken away by the gov't which requires licences & permission to do anything.



The gov't takes the birth certificate and deposits it in its TREASURY, and then takes out a BOND based on future taxes that can be collected.



This allows the bankrupt gov't to borrow money from the IMF, international monetary fund. The freeborn child is sold into slavery UNKNOWINGLY by its parents in exchange for benefits like child tax credit, welfare, free health care, school, etc.



There are ROMAN MAXIMS of LAW that state he who accepts the benefit must bare its burden. The freeborn child has the right to contract out of this when they turn the AGE of MAJORITY usually 18 but 14 in some countries. (People used to only live to 35 yrs, there was no such thing as a teenager, boy then man).



So the sneaky gov't gets you to voluntarily fill out a social security/social insurance form to get an EMPLOYEE number for the IRS/CRA. You need this number to access benefits like unemployment insurance or student loans.



You become an employee of the IMF/federal gov't which is slave to its lender. (National debt). All birth certificates are written on EXCHEQUER bank note paper owned by the CROWN.  Even Americans.



The corporation of the United States is registered at the Inner City of London England a Roman Enclave of the Vatican.



Canada & Australia are registered on the United States Security & Exchange (SEC).



You were born free, you are now a slave by choice. You gave up your birthright for a mess of pottage.



You filled out all the forms & applications of your free will. Jesus said his people destroy themselves through lack of knowledge.



Knowledge is power.



When teenagers have the chance to contract themselves out of the system (90 days) they are too busy caught up in the manufactured rock & roll, hip hop, extended childhood with booze & drugs & skateboards & videogames.



The gov't created Identification is property of the government. The State or province created the document, it has the intellectual property rights claim to it. It is the BEAST's name that you accepted. It is your SLAVE name.



You are its authorized representative, its agent in commerce.



Read the fine print on your checks signature. Free people use an autograph, agents use a signature. Everything you own & have is registered in that slave name, not your name your parents give you. However all of this was done in fraud and you can contract your way back out if you search for the knowledge in a law dictionary & your gov'ts statutes & codes.



Why can Nelson Rockefellar testify before congress that he pays no income tax? Cause he's a freeman and you are not.



Did you ever watch the mini series ROOTS? What did they do to the slaves? Beat them until they identified with the slave masters name, not their birth name.



They went from Kunta Kintai to Jason Washington. The slave master had to keep a record of his property and it was written in his name not the Africans.



The civil war didn't free the slaves it turned all Americans into property of the corporation of the United States.



It has been a slow long process but the Jesuits have patience.



Before the civil war Americans owned their children as biological property, they owned their own land in alloidal with absolutely no property tax. A mans labour could not be taxed so they captured you on paper and made you volunteer to be a HUMAN instead of a man.



Look up the LEGAL definition of HUMAN in a 1948 Ballantine Law Dictionary.



HUMAN: see monster.MONSTER: lower form of man, not of blueblood, unfit to own property, a barbarian even if created through the lawful union of marraige.



What is the worlds biggest JOB internet site in the world?www.monster.com / www.monster.ca



Color of law through defacto usuped authorative legislation is what is known as a privately owned legal system of the CROWN. LEGAL is not LAWFUL.



Then their is color of man. HUE: aura or color.Human-hueman.When people get married its called HUSBAND & WIFE. When ROYALTY get married its the monarch & consort.



Queen Elizabeth doesn't have a husband, she has a CONSORT.



Prince Phillip is a consort, not a husband.When a cattle farmer or rancher breeds livestock its called ANIMAL HUSBANDRY.



We are cattle, or chattel property! We are a human resource, a product of the STATE.



Now you know some more of your HER-IT-AGE, and HIS-STORY.



The NAME GAME Explained



Recent research here in Canada shows that the income tax, and all other statutory law, is imposed upon basis of  the 'property right', and that property right is the property right of the corporate Crown in Canada, and corporate State (be it a State or the UNITED STATES) in the USA.



The same scheme can be found in any country that is a subject country of the Pontiff of Rome's Holy Roman Empire. Thus, in actuality, the assumed 'property right' is that of the corporate Holy Roman Empire, as the Crown or incorporated State is an agency for the Holy Roman Empire.



The ‘Crown’ is the administrative corporation of the Pontiff of Rome owned City of London,



the financial, legal and professional standards capitol of/for the Vatican, The City of London is



a square mile area within Greater London, England, and is an independent city-state. In the USA, the administrative corporation for the Pontiff of Rome is the UNITED STATES, and that corporation administers the Vatican capitol, for, primarily, military purposes, called Columbia, or the District of Columbia. The UNITED STATES also administers the 50 sub-corporate States of the United States of America, identified with the 2 cap letters – CA, OR, WA, etc.



All adult humans are deceived into using the fiction name, as imprinted on the copy of the birth certificate you receive when ordering it from Provincial/State Vital Statistics, or to whatever



source you apply. Although the birth certificate is of somewhat recent origin and used to formally offer 'citizens' as chattel in bankruptcy to the Pope's Holy Roman Empire owned Rothschilds' Banking System, the false use of the family name goes back into the Middle Ages in England. Thus, it is with the family name made a primary, or surname,  (example - Mister Jones), and the given names of the child (example - Peter) made a reference name to the primary name.



This is the reverse or mirror image to reality. A 'family name' is NOT a man's name - it is a name of a clan - a blood relationship. [Replace the example names with your given and family name.]



We are then 'forced' or 'obliged' to use that name in all commercial and Government dealings and communications. So, when we do use it, as 99.99% of the human inhabitants of North America (and most of the world) do, we supposedly 'voluntarily' attach ourselves, the free will adult human, to the Crown/State owned property, called the 'legal identity name' as an accessory attached to property owned by Another party.



Think of a ship under tow by another ship.



Which captain decides what route the ships will take? The ‘legal name/strawman’ is the tow rope, and the towing ship is the corporate (make-believe ship at sea) Crown of the City of London. As an attachment to the legal name owned by the Crown, you are the towed ship, and your vessel captain, your free will mind, is now a subservient crewmember to the captain of the Crown.



The State or Crown does not give us authority, grant, license, permission or leave to use the Crown or State owned legal identity name. Thus, our use of it as an adult free will man (male or female) is a form of 'theft' against a maritime jurisdiction entity (all incorporated bodies are 'make-believe ships at sea'). In maritime law, the accused is guilty until proven innocent.



This allows the Roman Law system, which we have, to impose 'involuntary servitude' upon an adult man. Involuntary servitude simply means a slave stripped of granted rights of a slave called a citizen, subject or freeman. This stripped rights included ‘due process of law’ - no jury trial, and charges where no harm has been done against another man, or his property with criminal intent.



We see this Roman Law within the US 13th Amendment (#2) instituted in the mid 1860's:



"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,"  The crime with which you have been convicted is 'unauthorized use' of the State's or Crown's intellectual property - the legal identity name.



The Crown/State then invokes the legal maxim, accessio cedit principali, [an accessory attached to a principal becomes the property of the owner of the principal], where the principal is the legal identity name as 'intellectual property'.  The owner is the corporation called the Crown/State, or UNITED STATES, and the accessory is the free will human who has supposedly volunteered himself to be 'property by attachment' of the Crown/State. An adult human who is property is, and by any other name, of 'slave status', be it citizen, subject or freeman.



I would point out here that all concepts that teach that the relationship between free will man and Government/corporate bodies is contractual are incorrect. All supposed remedies in contract law, American UCC or Canadian PPSA are ‘red herring’ diversions – some intended, and some in ignorance by the teachers, usually ‘pay-triots’ who see a ‘buck$$’ in teaching this, as it sounds authentic to those who don’t realize that Government sees them as slaves without right to find remedy in statutory law.



As a slave, one's property in possession, including body and labor, belongs to the slave owner 100%. And, the property right is a bundle of rights - own, use, sell, gift, bequeath and hypothecate property.



Thus, ALL 'income' resulting from the owned human slave's mental and/or physical labor belongs to the slave owner. That which is left with or granted to the slave for his own use



and maintenance is called a 'benefit'. In Canada, the 'return of income' [the phrase itself tells the story] is called a T1 'tax and benefits package'. The T1 or IRS (USA)1040 is an accounting by the slave of his fruits of labor that belongs to the slave owner, and the prescribed 'benefits' that he may keep or have back from withholding.  Thus, all income tax cases against the people', in reality, result from fraud, illegal concealment and theft by the accused slave of the slave owner's ‘property'.



Going back to an above paragraph, we find that the attachment of oneself to the Crown/State owned name is 'assumed to be voluntary', as the Crown/State has no valid right to impose slavery upon adult humans against their will, except as stated in the next paragraph. Anyone working as an employee is in a contract of voluntary servitude - direction and time control by, and obedience and loyalty to, the employer. Until we ‘assumed to be slaves' get our heads around this key to the lock that holds our chains of slavery around our necks and ankles, we will continue to attempt to swim with that 100 lb ball chained to our leg.



Another factor of the use of the Roman Law system is contained within the 1860's 13th Amendment to the US Constitution, the Constitution of the corporate UNITED STATES,



[and not the 13th Amendment of the US Republic inserted around 1819]. In the later 13th



amendment, it says: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."  Notice that this applies only to the corporate body called the UNITED STATES.



All corporate bodies are make-believe ships at sea, and are thus, internally, under maritime law, [incorrectly called ‘admiralty law’, unless applied to the military]. In maritime law, an accused is guilty unless proven innocent. Thus, a free will adult man who uses, without authority, the property of a corporate body is under maritime jurisdiction. This makes a free will man who uses a corporate Crown or corporate State owned legal identity name a 'convicted criminal’, and thus subject to the imposition of slavery, involuntary servitude.



You, as a child, were Crown or State property by way of the birth registry, and thus, you could use Crown or State property, the legal identity name. When you became an adult, as a vessel on the 'sea of life' as a sovereign captain/free will mind, you no longer had a right to use (as an 'identity’ name) that Crown or State owned legal identity name.



Reports of unsuccessful attempts at paying government imposed debts using the Canadian Bills of Exchange Act or US UCC provisions of settling an account proved that there was no contract issue between a Canadian or American adult human and the Government as is commonly taught by some patriot gurus. Under contract, a 'bill' is a method of equalizing a contract - like value exchanged for like value.



However, under the 'property right' of a slave owner in regard to property in the possession of an owned slave, a 'demand' for the property by the slave owner, or the slave owner's agent (such as the IRS, or county tax collector, or for a court imposed fine), is all that is necessary, without regard to due process of law. Remember, ALL that a slave possesses belongs to the slave owner.



I am NOT saying you ARE a slave. I just point out to you that Government, and its employees, judges and officers SEE you as a SLAVE. See sections 35, 46 and 78 of the "Bills of Exchange Act of Canada" regarding eligibility for use of the provisions of that Act.  GOOGLE it. A bill can only be paid with money, and there is no money in Canada or the USA since the early 1930s. All that is left is some form of a 'promissory note'. In Canada, Parliament even converted the Canadian currency to pure Monopoly Game money by declaring that Canadian currency is no longer a promissory note nor bill of exchange. (Section 25(6) of the Bank of Canada Act).



Now, if you get a mortgage from a bank, instead of the bank lending you the money (credit value created by your signed promissory note) you created by your signature, as they did prior to the late 1970s, they use it as payment for Canadian Bank Notes, or computer values of it, which is just property since Section 25(6) was added. They  create it out of nothing if they put a number in a computer, or pay for the printing of the paper notes, and not the value printed on the currency note. You still create the money value for your mortgageby your bill of exchange - the promissory note.



Further, when any 'officer' of the corporate body, be it 'peace officer or police', all the way to



King or President choose to declare someone 'homo sacer' (meaning a man who has been stripped of his status of 'person' - that being an obedient corporate slave member of the corporate body politic) - he is stripped of the rights of due process of law, and can be fined, punished, tortured or killed without repercussion to the officer, or officer involved. This happens all the time in the world of the Holy Roman Empire.



This doctrine of 'homo sacer' is clearly presented in the US Fugitive Slave Act 1850, Section 6:



http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/fugitive.htm



Quote: "In no trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged fugitive be admitted in evidence; and the certificates in this and the first [fourth] section mentioned, shall be conclusive of the right of the person or persons in whose favor granted, to remove such fugitive to the State or Territory from which he escaped, and shall prevent all molestation of such person or persons by any process issued by any court, judge, magistrate, or other person whomsoever. Unquote



Three major points here: 1. The accused disobedient slave cannot enter evidence in his own defense. Sound familiar? The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal and German 'Holocaust Denial' litigation courts declare that "truth is no defense".  Judges constantly ignore offered defenses by Government accused defendants, especially in traffic and income tax issues.



And, this may be acceptable if the judge were to explain why he need do that, but almost 100% of the time, no explanation is offered, and that is to hide the 'homo sacer' doctrine, and the fact that a slave is being tried for disobedience to the rules within the slave owner's property right.



2. The 'certificate' presented by the officer or agent of the property owner (declaration of property ownership) is sufficient for conviction of disobedience - (Guilty, unless proven innocent by am officer of the Crown or of the UNITED STATES.)



3. No molestation (such as criminal or civil complaints) can be made by, or on behalf of the accused or convicted disobedient slave. Anyone know of successful litigation against a police



officer or judge who severely abused the unalienable rights of a man? Yes, there may be a few



in well publicized cases, where the system has to hide their despotic Roman scheme, but that is rare.



I am not suggesting that the Fugitive Slave Act is still being used. It was likely rescinded at some time; however, what I do say is that the provisions written within that act were directly out of the Roman Law system in dealing with disobedient slaves, and it is Roman Law that is being imposed upon the free will adult people in America and Canada who have had Roman slavery imposed upon them. English common law is, in reality Roman Municipal Law, a form of maritime law, where there is frequent use of the ‘notwithstanding clause’ of all ships at sea, and make-believe ships at sea - incorporated bodies - (The captain may deviate from any rules wheen he deems it necessary for the good of the ship). Thus,  by using that, English common law is frequently referred to as ‘judge made law’.



A POSSIBLE REMEDY



However, since we are 'forced to', or 'obliged to' use the Crown/State owned legal identity name in all commercial and government dealings, services and communications, we can make a 'claim of right' under the Rule of Private Necessity – with the necessity being the means to sustain and maintain our life, as all food, shelter, clothing, means of travel and that which answers our need for happiness all has to be obtained or used in the realms of commerce. Briefly, commerce is all communications, contracts, and other interrelations and interactions with other parties, which includes government.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_(tort)



This should counter the claim that we 'voluntarily' attach ourselves to Crown/State property.



Repeating - The Private Necessity is that we cannot do anything in relation to life, liberty, property or due process of law without using the Crown/State owned name, and thus we cannot sustain or maintain our lives without that fiction name.



The name separation is only a court tactic, as the legal name is always the one charged. The Government intent, of course, is to get to the adult man (m or f) attached to that name (identified) - the attached accessory - you. Otherwise you, and your  children need to 'use' that legal name in all commerce (communication - action with another party), and you do so under private necessity. So, only in court do you need to prove:



1. That you are a separate party from the named defendant.



2. That you only use the legal name, named as defendant, under private necessity to sustain and maintain your life, and that you are not voluntarily attached to it permanently as an accessory to Crown property.



3. That the copy of the birth certificate held by oneself has been surrendered to the Court, and I deny any fiduciary responsibility for that Crown property or the name thereon. [Preferably should have been previously surrendered, along with the Canada asseveration, to a judge in chambers hearing.]



4. It all comes right down to this: 'Informed consent'. You do not have to consent to be ‘identified’ as being the name found on the birth certificate. "I do not authorize you to recognize me as being one and the same as the legal identity name you find on your documents. I do not consent to being identified by any name."



Also, a Freedom Of Information Demand should be sent to the Minister, or Representative



requesting the authority, date, means and methods by which you, a free will man (m or f) became a slave owned by the corporate Crown or State. If they cannot offer such proof -  usually your proof is ‘no response’ -  acceptance by ‘silence being acquiescence’ by them of your assertion that you are not a slave owned by the Crown or State.



A process that has worked recently in Texas is the 'surrender' of the copy of the birth certificate one has in possession to a judge, or the judge assigned to a case where you, in the legal name, are the defendant, in an 'in chambers' hearing. Some call this 'surrender' of the defendant (the legal name) as being on the 'private side' using the Biblical method of settling disputes privately if possible.



This is preferred to 'surrendering it in court' as that is on the 'public side', and as a human presence in the court  room, the assumption that you are an attachment to the legal name has already been made. And being attached as an accessory to it, you become surety, guarantor and do 'represent' the legal identity name defendant.



Birth information is collected by the state and turned over to the U.S. The all-caps fictitious corporate entity is then placed into a “trust”, known as a “Cestui Que Trust”. A cestui que trust is defined as: “He who has a right to a beneficial interest in and out of an estate the legal title to which is vested in another; The beneficiary of another.” Cestui que use is: “He for whose use and benefit lands or tenements are held by another. The cestui que user has the right to receive the profits and benefits of the estate, but the legal title and possession, as well the duty of defending the same, reside in the other.”



Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt United States which acts as the “Debtor in Possession.” We are designated by this government as human “resources” or human “capital“. You may have noticed that all “personnel” offices have been converted to “human resource” offices. The government assumes the role of the Trustee while the newborn child becomes the beneficiary of his own trust. Absent the fraud involved, legal title to everything the child will ever own is vested in the government. The government then places the Trust into the hands of the parents, who are made the “guardians.” The child may reside in the hands of the guardians until such time as the state claims that the parents are no longer capable to serve. The state then goes into the home and removes the “trust” from the guardians. At the age of majority, the parents lose their guardianship.



All Christian births used to be recorded in the family Bible only. The reason for instituting the Birth Certificate is so the state can claim title to your person. It is a common law principle that says what one creates one may control. Via your state issued Birth Certificate in the name of your all-caps person you are considered to be a slave or indentured servant to the various Federal, State and local governments. This legal maneuver is compounded further when one obtains a driver’s license, marriage license or a Social Security Number. You have no Rights in state-approved birth, marriage, or even death. The state claims the sovereign right to all legal fiction titles it creates.



And it doesn’t end there.



The creditors of the United States were getting nervous by the mid-1960′s. President Nixon had to collateralize more debt. He settled upon a plan to quietly set aside huge tracts of American land with their mineral rights in reserve to cover the outstanding debts. But the American people were already angered over the Vietnam “war”. Nixon couldn’t very well admit that he was parceling out huge chunks of the United States to holders of U.S. debt. So, he invented the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 and passed draconian environmental laws which served to grab land with vast natural resources away from the owners and lock it away, proving to the holders of the debt that Americans are not drilling, mining, or otherwise developing those resources. As the government sinks deeper into debt, it grabs more and more land, declares it to be a “wilderness,” “heritage river,” or “wetlands” area. There are various other designations, but the end result is the same: The People may not use the land. In many cases they are forbidden to set foot on it.It is not about conservation, it is about establishing collateral. YOUR land is being stolen by the government and used to secure loans the government really had no business taking out in the first place. Given that the government cannot get out of debt, and is collateralizing more and more land to avoid foreclosure, the day is not far off when the people of the United States will be told that they are no longer private citizens with private property rights but mere tenants living on another’s property. This day will arrive swiftly if Americans give up their firearms





* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Addendum 1 Name Game



I don't promote or use the Commercial Redemption system. I just suggest showing the 'authorities" that I, and the 'legal name' are not one and the same party. The Statement of Live Birth and the Birth Certificate can be used as proof of that, since, as a child, you had nothing to do with the registration of your birth, nor with the choice of names you were to be called as a child. Don’t be tempted to say that the names are your Christian name, or given names. The Crown or State claimed ownership of those names when you birth was registered. As an adult



man (m or f), you simply have ‘NO NAME’ - you only have an appellation or ‘commonly called’



term, word or written term or word that gets your mind’s attention. You are your mind in a vessel, and thus the sovereign captain of that vessel, regardless who or what corporation may claim ownership of it.



1. The Birth Certificate shows that it belongs to the State/Province where you were born, and thus, is the property of the State or Crown in right of the Province.



2. The name on that shows your family name to be the primary name of the 'legal name' - a 'surname', and the first and second names being referential to it. That is fiction. The family name is a clan name. It is not the name of an individual man (m or f).



3. The Statement of Birth shows that the first and second name is a gift (given names), and as such is a contract. However, names only identify a child - not an adult. An infant (under age 21) cannot be party to a contract. An acceptor of a gift must 'accept', and accept voluntarily. Thus, you have never 'accepted' the given names. There is no mechanism to do that in the Roman Law we are under. The Roman law only sees the legal identity name, a name that belongs to the corporate Roman Empire of the Pope.



4. An adult man is actually a mind inhabiting a physical human body. Only things can be named. A mind is a process, not a thing.



Thus, when a human becomes an adult, that is akin to the launching of a new ship. The adult mind is equivalent to the captain of a ship at sea. The captain is sovereign or supreme on his ship. The only way a captain of a ship can lose that sovereignty is by putting his ship 'in tow' voluntarily behind another ship. It is then that the tow ship captain gains sovereignty over the captain of the ship in tow.



The legal identity name is the rope that ties our vessel to the corporate Crown of the City of London (owned by the corporate Holy Roman Empire).



The Name Game Blog explains the rest.



Addendum 2 Name Game   (Thanks to Vic Beck for this insight)



The name "they" use on all their documents, including indictments, is the legal name. I believe there is no argument with that. In fact, the courts are usually ready to agree with that classification without hesitation.



By presenting the Statement of Birth (SOB) to them and asking them to do an investigation with a view to answering just two simple questions, will repel all attacks from the "system". The two questions are:



1. Who has secured the rights (legal and equitable) in the legal name??? (insert name exactly as it appears on the Birth Certificate even though the all caps aspect is a red herring); and,



2. What rights do I have in the legal name ???



The answers to these two questions will prove (in Ontario SOB's are admissible in any Ontario court as Proof, not just evidence, of the facts so certified) that



1. the government secured the rights (a.k.a. the secured party) in the legal name and, therefore, I have no rights in the legal name.



2. If I have no rights in the legal name, then how can I have any obligations related to the legal name?



The party that the law holds legally responsible for the financial and other obligations of the property (legal name) is the secured party, which is the government in the case of the legal name. This is all proven by the SOB!



It would seem to me that there is no place for the system to go once this truth is on the table. Certainly CRA can be easily defeated with this approach.



However, the judge may make the assumption that by your ‘permanent’ use of the legal identity name, you have become an accessory attached to that Crown owned name, and thus you are the property of the Crown by the legal maxim, which arises out of the property right, accessio cedit principali.



Thus, to complete the above procedure, you must, by asseveration (formerly, affidavit) or notice, make a claim of right of free will status and claim that the Crown owned name is used under private necessity in commerce to sustain and maintain your life. As such, your use of the Crown owned name is not a voluntary act by yourself.



The following is a further explanation of the name use. The previous explanation was still not fully understood by some respondents:



Explaining name usage



When we are a child, we can have an identifying name because we are property, property that should belong to the natural parents, but by 'registry’ of live birth, where the parents identify themselves as being of slave status owned by the corporate Crown, the child becomes the property of the Corporate Crown. Because the child does not have a matured mind, it is a vessel under construction in 'dry dock'.



When the registry of live birth is performed, the Province, as an agent for the Crown, then changes the family name to a 'sur' or primary name, thus making the Crown owned legal name as intellectual property owned by the Crown.



As the child grows up, the child is taught by society and the education system to identify him or herself by that legal name, an accept the idea that they have a 'surname'.



When the child reaches the age of majority, the human vessel is launched on the sea of life, and the mature moral thinking mind becomes the supreme commander of the human vessel. The supremacy of the captain of a vessel supercedes any claim of ownership when the vessel is on the high sea. This had to be overcome in the maritime world of corporate bodies, which are make-believe shops at sea.



So, what Government, as agent for the corporate Crown devised was to not give authorization for the adult man to identify him or herself by the legal name, even though they were taught to do so all their life as a child. Thus, a man, identifying him or herself as being one and the same as the legal name, the name one finds on the birth certificate, is an act of theft of intellectual property of another and triggers the legal maxim (requires no further proof) arising out of the property right - accessio cedit principali - an accessory attached (without authorization) to a principal becomes the property of the principal. Thus the supposed to be free will man, with the mind being the supreme commander of his human vessel/body, becomes like a ship under tow by another ship - a slave to the towing ship.



In this world of commerce (mariitime trade) and make-believe ships/corporate bodies, as all Governments and nations are, we have to be able to communicate to gain our food, shelter and clothing - the essentials of life support for ourselves. Thus, instead of accepting that we are one and the same as the Crown owned legal name, we can see it as the legal name being our 'agent in commerce', and used by ourselves under private necessity. Necessity negates any legal assumptions, such as the accessio cedit principali scheme.



So, what about our given or Christian names? When we reach adulthood, we are a mind existing within a human body/vessel. A mind is a process, and not a physical thing, and thus cannot be identified by a name, any physical attribute or a picture. All we can have are sights or sounds that get our attention - called an appellation, or 'commonly called'. 'Appel' means 'call' in French.



Court procedure:



So, in a court situation, it is important to speak up at the beginning and say:



"I am a living flesh and blood soul. I am here to seek *‘remedy’.



And, as such I am here to speak for (legal name). I do not consent to be identified by any name.



And, since the legal system is won’t to fraudulently assume that I, the free will man and undisclosed principal, am the surety and guarantor of all debts imposed upon the legal name (strawman name here), I inform the court that I use the legal name, (strawman name here) , under private necessity to sustain and maintain my life.



If you use (first name) or Mister (family name), I will respond; however those are only appellations to address me, but I do not accept them as identifying names."



[Note: I would suggest taking this printed on a piece of paper to read, so you don’t miss any of the details.]



If asked your status or relationship with the accused, you say:



“(legal name) is my agent in commerce. Because I cannot have an identifying name as a free will living adult man, to communicate with the fiction system, thus, I am the 'undisclosed principal' and creditor and beneficiary of the trust wherein (legal name) is my agent and trustee in trust."



The reason for emphasizing ‘living’ is that the ‘registry of live birth’ expires in 7 years, and after 7 years the legal system presumes you to be ‘legally dead’, and thus just a body owned by the Crown.



If the circumstance should arise that the judge declares a recess, be prepared to make the full speech again when the judge returns to his bench, except, instead of ‘remedy’, you ask for**‘cure and maintenance’.  If the judge were to call a second recess, then again repeat the beginning statement, except this time declare that you are ***the Son of the Creator Diety, and demand the judges subservience as a representative of a lesser god.



Notes:



*‘Remedy’ is a primary obligation of honour for a judge in English common law.



**‘Cure and Maintenance’ is an obligation of a judge in Maritime or Admiralty jurisdiction.



***‘Declaring oneself to be a Son of the Creator Diety is to a judge in the role as a priest of Baal or Molech as symbolized by the black robe of holocaust decorated with the crimson blood of human sacrifice.  In cannon law, which they represent, they are out of their league or jurisdiction in their fiction role as priest of a lesser diety judging a Son of the Father in Heaven.



Some claim that Her Majesty, or the corporate Crown, has given one permission to use the Crown owned legal identity name. That assumption is arrived at by way of the Ontario 'Change of Names Act' which says: "Ch. C7;  Person's name:  2.(1)  For all purposes of Ontario law, (a)   a person whose birth is registered in Ontario is entitled to be recognized by the name appearing on the person's birth certificate or change of name certificate".



As it states, it only applies to 'persons'- which is the combination of the strawman name and the adult man, making that combined entity the 'property and subject of'  the corporate Crown. That certainly is not the status we, as free will minded creatures, would wish to be.



Addendum 3 The Name Game



CONSENT



Regarding the use of the legal identity name, this thing comes down to consent. No means no and silence means yes.





In the Government scheme of things we are all of the one individualized, making you source energy flowing through a BC that is always connected to the national treasury. In essence a BC is issued of the treasury so that all we do through the name on it flows to the/our treasury. However, that changes if you are recognized through a legal name.



The Birth Certificate is never un-connected from the treasury, 'For Treasury use only', just as you are never un-connected with the divine. You are the source, source energy, and in legal land, the treasury is source. The Statement Of Birth, as proof, is recognized by the government that it is so. Humans in this world are source energy. Source of commercial energy, to use that term, for without human, nothing happens. Just as in the bigger picture, without God nothing happens. So if you are searching for access to the treasury account look in mirror.



An old 'Law and Order' show. A woman was after the police to get a man who was stalking her. Again and again she went to the police to get this man to stop stalking her. Finally a detective says, "Mam, that man is not stalking you."  "Oh yes he is" she says. "No Mam, he is not.  There is nothing in our law books about stalking.  So, that man there is not stalking you." This is how law and legal authority work. If it is not on the books, then it does not exist. In the case of that show there was no such thing as a stalker or stalking.



Show me the law or authority upon which anyone may rely that authorizes any agent to recognize you through a legal name? There is no such authority WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT. How is consent obtained against you by the agents? By your silence. Anytime you are getting 'done by', and remain silent, you are capitulating (in agreement). We are entitled to be recognized THROUGH (by means through) the legal name on the BC, but we are also entitled to say "No. I do not consent to be recognized by the name". If as has been the case you make it clear that you do not consent to be recognized through the legal name and the other party ignores you, and you do not take an appropriate course of action to stop it, you are agreeing to get 'done by'.

So what we have going on here is a whole bunch of agents are recognizing us THROUGH a legal name, and we are not doing anything about it = silence. And, by = through.



WHEREAS [I like that word], if you know that there is no authority, legal, lawful or otherwise, for an agent to recognize you through a legal name, and you make it clear that you do not consent to be recognized through the name, that party is in the commission of a crime if he proceeds as if he has the authority because, in fact, there is no law that authorizes any agent to recognize you as anything or any capacity without your consent. No means no. Yes we must use a legal name, and yes, everything we do in that name is connected to the treasury, and the provinces /Canada, by holding the SOB's is in the loop as beneficiary/treasurer. But not if you are recognized through the legal name. By being recognized through the legal name, I say through because you are not the legal name, you are claiming ownership of property and the value of it; in essence, my stuff.





But if you do not consent to be recognized through the legal name, then the issuer of the BC is, and at that point is the owner of property and responsible for the debts, obligations, securities and undertakings of things you do through the legal name. The BC is always connected to the treasury (matrix), the question is, who then is the beneficiary. If you allow yourself to be recognized through the legal name then you are the beneficiary, but if you do not consent then the treasury (Canada) is the beneficiary.



Where we have failed ourselves is when we do not address the I do not consent to be recognized through the name on the BC properly. It is your license to do as you please. The license of licenses. There is no law or legislation anywhere that authorizes any agent to recognize you through a legal name. There is nothing that prevents them from doing so or trying either. It is up to you how you react if one does. What I am saying is, no agent has the legal backing to recognize you through the legal name that will indemnify them from harm (prosecution) if they do after you made it clear that you do not consent. In other words, they have ruled over us purely because we did not say I DO NOT CONSENT TO BE RECOGNIZED THROUGH THE LEGAL IDENTITY NAME, OR BY ANY NAME; and there is no law that authorizes you to recognize me through a name without my consent.

Addendum 4  The Name Game



Consent #2



When you present government ID and you do not want to be recognized through the name on it just say; I DO NOT AUTHORIZE YOU TO RECOGNIZE ME THROUGH THE NAME ON THIS ID.





There is no other source of such authority is what you need to get here. Your it.



Now everything we have learned over the years and in particular lately backs this I do not consent thing. A BC is not and was never intended to be personal identification it evolved as the deputy registrar said and it evolved through our giving consent to be recognized.

The Government holds title to the legal name and entitles you to be recognized through a legal name which it cannot do unless it has rights in the name.   Significance of the government holding the SOB is proof.  There is no proof that your parents gave you the name that appears on a SOB, impossible for that to be proven.  Look up 'informed consent' at Wikipedia and you know now whats been going on. "Informed consent is a legal condition whereby a person can be said to have given consent based upon a clear appreciation and understanding of the facts, implications and future consequences of an action. In order to give informed consent, the individual concerned must have adequate reasoning faculties and be in possession of all relevant facts at the time consent is given.



Impairment to reasoning and judgement which would make it impossible for someone to give informed consent include such factors as severe mental retardation, severe mental illness, intoxication, severe sleep deprivation, Alzheimer's disease, or being in a coma.



Some acts cannot legally take place because of a lack of informed consent. In cases where an individual is considered unable to give informed consent, another person is generally authorized to give consent on their behalf e.g. parents or legal guardians of a child and care-givers for the mentally ill.



However, if a severely injured person is brought to hospital in an unconscious state and no-one is available to give informed consent, doctors will give whatever treatment is necessary to save their life (according to the Hippocratic oath) which might involve major surgery e.g. amputation.



In cases where an individual is provided insufficient information to form a reasoned decision, serious ethical issues arise. Such cases in a clinical trial in medical research are anticipated and prevented by an ethics committee or Institutional Review Board."



Nolo.com legal definition of 'informed consent':



An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives.



For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings .



Sell everything you own.



Get 3 friends or witnesses, make up your own identification, get it notarized, post it in court houses, serve it to your local police departments, tell them who you are before you get into trouble, stop borrowing money, close you bank accounts, de-register everything in that old name, don't be a voter, become an ELECTOR & lawful land owner, tell the county or rural municipality to state their interest in your property.



Fire them, you don't need them to hold your property in trust therefore removing you from having to get a permit to build something on your own land.



Surrender all your gov't identification back to it creator, stop identifying with it, become your original name.



Jesus said not to celebrate your birth into this world. This doesn't mean He hates cake & ice cream, He's warning you not to swear an oath of jurisdiction or affidative that allows ROME to usurp God's authority by creating a property label/gov't slave name with a birthdate. The Vatican wants you to beleive it is a vessel on the unholy SEE/SEA to enforce maritime admiralty merchant law.



[link to thinkfree.ca] It doesn't cost you anything unlike other PAYtriot$ sites.



HERE ARE LAWS IN AMERICA MOST DON'T KNOW, BUT SHOULD



The IRS is not a US government agency it is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund)(Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Sen...ate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)



The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N.(Black's Law Dictionary 6th Ed. page 816)



The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921(41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654)



The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund)(Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887)



The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over.



(Executive Order 12803)



The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA, and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the U.S. government. Even though the "U.S. Government" held stock in the agencies.(U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239)



Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are Department of the Treasury.(20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b))



There are NO Judicial courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes.(FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178)



There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators.(FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178)



According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number.(House Report (103-826)



New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that "New York City is the capital of the World." For once, he told the truth.(20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) )



Social Security is not insurance or a contract. Nor is there a Trust Fund.(Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548)



Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations.(It says U.S. Department of Treasury at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)



You own NO property, Slaves can't own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours. you are listed as a TENANT.(Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)



The Most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.(42 PA. C.S.A. 502)



The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War.(Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)



You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it.(Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)



America is a British Colony. The 'United States' is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796(Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774)



Britain is owned by the Vatican.(Treaty of 1213)



The Pope can abolish any law in the United States(Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)



A 1040 Form is for Tribute paid to Britain(IRS Publication 6209)



The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.(Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493)



The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of Millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)



The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone.(Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44)



We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children.(Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)



Military Dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) into Districts(Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate)



"The People" does NOT include you and me.(Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)



It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers.(SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247)



Everything in the "United States" is up for Sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc... Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake??(Executive Order 12803)



"We are human capital(Executive Order 13037)



The U.N.-United Nations has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. see above) and now owns every man, woman and child in America.



The U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple.Source: http://home/iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/essays.html



According to this site:



The good news is we don't have to fulfill "our" fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another's fictitious obligation.



These documents are not secret, they are a matter of public record.



Simple words such as "person" "citizen" "people" "or" "nation" "crime" "charge" "right" "statute" "preferred" "prefer" "constitutor" "creditor" "debtor" "debit" "discharge" "payment" "law" and "United States" doesn't mean what we think it does because we were never taught the legal definitions of the above words.



The illusion is much larger than what is cited on this site.



Restored America History



The plan is a bold achievable strategy for behind-the-scenes peaceful reconstruction of the dejure institutions of government without controversy, violence or civil war. After a national vote and approval by the body of Republic Assemblies, the plan is now in the implementation phase to accomplish the following:



Restore and re inhabit the dejure institutions of lawful government.



End the foreclosure nightmare (for borrowing against one’s own credit).



End tax prosecutions for resisting the transfer of private wealth to such as I.R.S. (former Puerto Rico Bureau of Taxation).



End street assaults against the sovereign People for failing to exhibit a State-issued confession of subject-class citizenship. End all prosecutions which lack an injured party.



End admiralty prosecutions for kidnapping and other heinous crimes against mankind as “commercial crimes” against the corporate State under a contrived corporate color-of-law venue (corp. ref. 27 C.F.R. 72.11).



End the use of covert contracts such as Form 1040, car registrations, birth certificate applications, and bank signature cards which confess the signer to be a legal fiction subject of the United States Federal Corporation (“U.S. person”) that has waved his/her rights in favor of state-issued privileges.



End the use of deeds which classify the People as “tenants” on their own land, thereby transferring control to incorporated County registrars and tax assessors.



End the perversion of marriage into a commercial system of state-issued privileges through the so-called “marriage license” whereby incorporated “courts” presume the “right” to trespass on families and kidnap children.



End the hijacking of automobile ownership through DMV registrations which covertly exchange the divine rights of travel and ownership for the state-issued “privileges” of “driving” and “title.”



In place of all of the above, substitute sovereign identification, diplomatic immunity and sovereign passports to facilitate safe passage throughout the world free from corporate State molestation and terror.



Restore the People’s money and wealth from the banking institutions, war profiteers, and international loan sharks. Instantly vest all mortgages, auto loans and personal business loans “issued” by members of the Fed.



The state shall hold no paper on, or debts against, the sovereign People, directly or through its agencies and licensed banking institutions. Instantly end all non-consensual and unlawful taxation including all taxes on the sacred rights of labor and privacy.



Empower and inspire the sovereign People to righteousness through such renewed abundance.



Issue orders to the military and police powers to enforce the Peoples’ divine rights of birth.



End the perverse act of requiring the People to pray to “courts” as is now required under corporate rules and traditions. Restore the dejure judicial institutions including the district court of the United States and the one supreme Court. Quietly mirror the strategies of 1933 thereby using their (our) institutions, military and public officials to undo eighty years of subterfuge without provoking alarm, controversy or armed conflict. Forgive all corporate actors who repent for their State-sponsored crimes against mankind.



Remove the recidivists from office.



Do all of the above, and more, peacefully, discreetly, quietly and honorably, behind the scenes, without public proclamations or provocative actions against a general public that is mostly unaware of the hijacking of their free de jure American republics, and their hapless media.



These MONEY CREATING and TAX COLLECTING PRIEST~HOODS directly control the reins of FREEMASONRY, the Secret Society that in turn controls all POLITICS, LAW ENFORCEMENT, ORGANIZED CRIME, FREE TRADE and ORGANIZED RELIGION. ALL PRIESTS, OF ALL RELIGIONS, whether they are publicly styled Priest, Reverend, Bishop, Cardinal, Monk, Llama, or Pope, ultimately report through a chain-of-command that leads directly to the MONEY CREATING/TAX COLLECTING PRIEST~HOODS.



Religion is a second level of direct taxation that taxes your current dreams as well as your hopes for everlasting life. Masonry began in 58800BC with the eviction of "Pedophiles" from Matrial Clan Society. These predators established the first "Priest~hood" and declared their eviction "the Original Sin".



The Priests vowed revenge against women and original peoples. By the end of the last Ice Age they were ready to put their plan for a New World Order, a Patriarchal Society, to work. This is when they "Freed" a large number of Genetically Modified Masons to work on Human Engineering; thereby fabricating FREE~MASONRY! Priesthoods created SIN so that they might benefit from the guilt trips that control humanity.



Think of any sin and you will see that these are practiced at will, without fear, by the Priests, but are denied to the rest of us.... bribes, blackmail, fornication, greed, avarice, and yes, even mass murder. Their TAXMAN (Taxmas) even gave you a Social Insurance Number (SIN)~!



IRS Mail Fraud Instruct



What I would do is to first of all make copies of all of the correspondence that you have received including the envelope. Then do a google search (do not try to get this from irs.gov) for Form 4490 Proof of Claim 5 page Form and copy it down, but do not fill it in. Then I would send certified mail this form with a cover letter that tells them to fill out the form and get it back to you in 15 days sent to the last place that sent you a letter. Be sure to include your name and address and SSN on the cover letter and keep a copy of it and the Form 4490. After they do not respond (have not had one responded to yet) send a registered mail complaint to the universal postal union in Bern Switzerland stating that this agency is attempting to collect on a debt that they have refused to verify (cost about $25.) and are using the United States Mail to do it--mail fraud. You will need the correspondence from them including the envelope and use the copy of what you sent to the irs as an exhibit of what you sent to the irs.



Tax his land, tax his wage,



Tax his bed in which he lays.



Tax his tractor, tax his mule,



Teach him taxes is the rule.



Tax his cow, tax his goat,



Tax his pants, tax his coat.



Tax his ties, tax his shirts,



Tax his work, tax his dirt.



Tax his chew, tax his smoke,



Teach him taxes are no joke.



Tax his car, tax his grass,



Tax the roads he must pass.



Tax his food, tax his drink,



Tax him if he tries to think.



Tax his sodas, tax his beers,



If he cries, tax his tears.



Tax his bills, tax his gas,



Tax his notes, tax his cash.



Tax him good and let him know



That after taxes, he has no dough.



If he hollers, tax him more,



Tax him until he's good and sore.



Tax his coffin, tax his grave,



Tax the sod in which he lays.



Put these words upon his tomb,



"Taxes drove me to my doom!"



And when he's gone, we won't relax,



We'll still be after the inheritance tax.



BARACK H OBAMA is also Traded as THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES and the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES is also Traded as SUPREME COURT. This clearly shows that the UNITED STATES is a Corporation and not a Governmental body at all because a real Government would never have the status of Traded as! That would be TREASON to allow it to be Traded as, on Wall Street. REIT is the ticker for the prison investors, mega bucks.



Where it says Traded as, they are not speaking of Trading recipes or baseball cards. The actual business GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES or UNITED STATES, INC. is a product Traded on Wall Street. Well actually, UNITED STATES, INC. Is Wall Street. And there are buffoons on here actually attempting to defend a business, thinking it's actually their government, when that couldn't be further from the truth. Unbelievable.



Here's your President on D&B: Headquarters GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES



Also Traded as BARACK H OBAMA THE U S CAPITOL, WASHINGTON, DC



Here's your Courts: Headquarters SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES OF THE



Also Traded as SUPREME COURT 1 1ST ST NE, WASHINGTON, DC



What you think is your government are businesses that are traded on Wall Street. There are investors that get paid, and you're not it. Although you should be, because you backed the TARPS, bailouts and everything



copy and paste .... www.DeTaxCanada.org ..... and click on 'The NAME GAME"



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-Rdp6PjQxE ~~~   Meet your STRAWMAN



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8O_flYaRe0 ~~~   Birth Certificate Bond (how to find out what YOU are worth!)



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5UcPeSb8kg ~~~   Income Taxes are illegal



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwZhU6uv9sA ~~~   Admiralty law vs Common law and the sovereign



http://www.cbsatlanta.com/news/26675368/detail.html ~~~Ga Lawmaker proposes doing away with drivers licenses



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbNIU2KEz4g ~~~ No, I will NOT Comply!



http://www.apfn.org/apfn/flag.htm ~~~ Get that Gold Fringe Off my Flag



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQfoFzJUsb0 ~~~   U.S. soldiers are waking up!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZefoCivlXFE ~~~ Every American and her allies should listen to this



http://www.stopthepirates.blogspot.com/ ~~~ Stop the Pirates















Same robes, same roles!








Do not comply, do not consent!







National Sun Day Law Crisis (Mark of the Beast)


Möbius Story: Wind and Mr. Ug

Amplify’d from www.youtube.com





Möbius Story: Wind and Mr. Ug


See more at www.youtube.com
 

Möbius Story: Wind and Mr. Ug

Ancient face carvings found in cave

Amplify’d from www.upi.com

Ancient face carvings found in cave

BRISBANE, Australia, Feb. 11 (UPI) -- Australian scientists looking for fossils in East Timor say they found something else -- ancient stone faces carved into the walls of a limestone cave.

A team of archaeologists and palaeontologists from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization were working in Lene Hara Cave on the northeastern tip of East Timor, searching for fossils of a species of extinct giant rats, the organization said in a release Friday.

"Looking up from the cave floor at a colleague sitting on a ledge, my head torch shone on what seemed to be a weathered carving," the organization's Ken Aplin said.

"I shone the torch around and saw a whole panel of engraved prehistoric human faces on the wall of the cave."

The Lene Hara carvings, or petroglyphs, are frontal, stylized faces each with eyes, a nose and a mouth, with one showing a circular headdress with rays that frame the face.

Uranium isotope dating of the "sun ray" face by the University of Queensland revealed the carving to be about 10,000 to 12,000 years old, placing it in the late Pleistocene epoch.

Although stylized engravings of faces have been found throughout Melanesia, Australia and the Pacific, the Lene Hara petroglyphs are the only examples that have been dated to the Pleistocene, the researchers say.

Read more at www.upi.com
 

New map charts a 'leaky' Earth

Amplify’d from www.upi.com

New map charts a 'leaky' Earth

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Feb. 11 (UPI) -- Canadian researchers have made the first-ever global survey of Earth's permeability -- essentially, they say, how "leaky" our planet is.

Their world map of permeability shows how easily water passes through surface rocks in all parts of the world, information that could provide understanding of the planet's water cycle and the sustainability of underground water sources, NewScientist.com reported Friday.

Crucially, the researchers at the University of British Columbia say, it could help unravel the hidden underground movements of most of the planet's fresh water -- water that is not taken into account in computer models used to predict climate.

"Groundwater makes up 99 percent of the fresh unfrozen water on Earth," says UBC researcher Tom Gleeson. "That huge store could somehow modulate the climate. There may be really complex interactions that we don't appreciate."

The map should help hydrologists work out how much groundwater moves from one basin or aquifer to another, which is important if the water is to be managed sustainably, researchers say.

Read more at www.upi.com
 

Freedom Action Network: The Future of the Light Bulb Ban


San Diego Port Officer Says Nukes Have Been Found In An American Port

Amplify’d from theintelhub.com

San Diego Port Officer Says Nukes Have Been Found In An American Port

Editors Note: This appears to be some sort of pathological mind game that certain elements of our government are using on the people, almost as if they are getting us ready for the reality of a  nuclear attack in America.

The Intel Hub

By Alex Thomas


February 12th, 2011

Al Hallor, the assistant port director and an officer with Customs and Border Protection has openly admitted that an unnamed government agency has found a nuclear weapon or weapon of mass effect at a U.S. port in the last year!

That’s right, an assistant port director has spilled the beans on a possible major government cover up. During the conversation the port authority press agent continually interrupted the officer in an attempt to get him to shut up.

Homeland Security was quick to “debunk” the officer, citing nervousness as the reason he made such a claim. Events like this make it clear that Homeland Security is far from being about actual security, instead they are a rogue agency dedicated to ushering in the police state.


“So, specifically, you’re looking for the dirty bomb? You’re looking for the nuclear device?” asked Blacher.


“Correct. Weapons of mass effect,” Hallor said.”


You ever found one?” asked Blacher.”Not at this location,” Hallor said.


“But they have found them?” asked Blacher.”Yes,” said Hallor.


The only thing this officer seems nervous about is telling the truth!

This is a very interesting story and we will do our best to do a major follow up in the next few days.

Are nukes and other bio weapons being smuggled into an America at an alarming rate? Has Homeland Security decided that we, the American people, do not have the right to know how much danger we are actually in?

Read more at theintelhub.com
 

Philadelphia church official charged in scandal

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
Philadelphia church official charged in scandal

Associated Press logo small 2Associated Press video buttonPHILADELPHIA - Nearly a decade after the scandal over sexual abuse by priests erupted, Philadelphia's district attorney has taken a step no prosecutor in the U.S. had taken before: filing criminal charges against a high-ranking Roman Catholic official for allegedly failing to protect children.

"I love my church," said District Attorney Seth Williams, himself a Catholic, "but I detest the criminal behavior of priests who abuse or allow the abuse of children."

Williams announced charges against three priests, a parochial school teacher and Monsignor William Lynn, who as secretary of the clergy was one of the top officials in the Philadelphia Archdiocese from 1992 to 2004.

The three priests and the teacher were charged with raping boys. Lynn, 60, was accused not of molesting children but of endangering them. A damning grand jury report said at least two boys were sexually assaulted because he put two known pedophiles in posts where they had contact with youngsters.

"The rapist priests we accuse were well-known to the secretary of clergy, but he cloaked their conduct and put them in place to do it again," the report said.

The grand jury report went further and suggested that the archbishop at the time, Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua, who retired in 2003, may have known what was going on. But no charges were brought against him. The report said that there is no direct evidence against the cardinal and that his lawyer testified that the 87-year-old Bevilacqua is suffering from dementia and cancer.

"On balance, we cannot conclude that a successful prosecution can be brought against the cardinal _ at least for the moment," the grand jury said.

Lynn could get up to 14 years in prison if convicted. His attorney, Tom Bergstrom, said: "We certainly don't concede for a moment that he knew he was putting children at risk."

Mark Crawford, New Jersey state director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, joined a few other activists for a rally Friday outside the archdiocese headquarters to welcome the charges.

"It's really incredible it's taken this long to say, 'Enough is enough,'" he said.

Five years ago, Williams' predecessor as district attorney issued a scathing report accusing the church of protecting child-molesting priests. But no charges were brought against the church, a huge and powerful entity in the Philadelphia region, where about one-third of the population is Catholic. With 1.5 million Catholics, the archdiocese is one of the biggest in the country.

The Rev. Thomas Doyle, a canon lawyer and one-time church insider who has become an advocate for victims of clergy abuse, said the charges against the monsignor reflect the shrinking power and influence of the Catholic Church since the crisis erupted in Boston in 2002.

"Up until now, there have been threats and the possibility of indictment, but for political reasons, people did not want to move in on the Catholic Church. It's never happened," Doyle said. "I really think this is a major breakthrough and I really hope that it is a signal and a sign of encouragement for district attorneys and federal prosecutors around the country."

Lynne Abraham, Williams' predecessor as district attorney, said the reason there haven't been charges before isn't political. She said victims are afraid to come forward when the wrongdoers are in positions of authority. And by the time the scandal unfolded, the statute of limitations had expired in the cases she investigated, she said.

Cardinal Justin Rigali, who succeeded Bevilacqua, said in a statement that the church is cooperating with authorities and would consider the grand jury's recommendations. He also said there are no priests working in the archdiocese who "have an admitted or established allegation of sexual abuse of a minor against them."

Outside the U.S., one Catholic bishop in France was convicted of shielding a priest in a sex-abuse. Pierre Pican, bishop of Bayeux-Lisieux in northwestern France, was sentenced to a three-month suspended prison term.

Over the past decade, prosecutors have pressed high-ranking church officials in the U.S. to accept responsibility for covering up abuse but never actually brought criminal charges against them as individuals.

For instance, Phoenix Bishop Thomas O'Brien admitted in 2003 that he sheltered abusive priests, an acknowledgment made as part of a deal with prosecutors that gave him immunity from any potential obstruction-of-justice charge. He agreed to institute reforms and cede some authority to other church officials.

The Diocese of Manchester, N.H., admitted wrongdoing but avoided criminal charges in 2003. The Archdiocese of Cincinnati pleaded no contest in 2003 to charges of failing to tell authorities about sex abuse claims against priests, paid a fine and created a fund for victims.

And in 2005, the Boston Archdiocese struck a deal to avoid an unprecedented federal indictment on allegations of making a false statement to federal authorities. Among other things, the archdiocese agreed to closer scrutiny of its child-protection programs.

The Philadelphia District Attorney's Office also convened a grand jury in 2002 to look into abuse by priests since the 1960s. Its report, issued in 2005, said that there was evidence of abuse by at least 63 priests and that church officials had transferred offenders to other parishes and dioceses. While Bevilacqua and other church officials were criticized, none were charged.

Abraham, district attorney at the time of the 2005 report, which included names and photographs of allegedly abusive priests, said Friday that it was the statute of limitations that held her office back.

She joined other advocates in pressing for Pennsylvania's child protection laws to be rewritten. She said the resulting changes helped clear the way for the charges Williams brought.

In a statement announcing the case against the five defendants Thursday, Williams said: "I know ultimately they will be judged by higher authority. For now, it is my responsibility as the elected district attorney of all the citizens of Philadelphia to hold them accountable."

Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

Vatican official: Church’s justice teachings need new 'vocabulary' for some US audiences

Amplify’d from endrtimes.blogspot.com


Vatican official: Church’s justice teachings need new 'vocabulary' for some US audiences

Cardinal Peter Kodwo Appiah Turkson
By Alan Holdren, Rome Correspondent

Vatican City, Jan 13, 2011 / 05:33 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- When he travels to the United States next month, Cardinal Peter Kodwo Appiah Turkson is aware that he may have to make some adjustments in the way he talks about the Church’s social teaching.

As president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, the Ghanaian cardinal, 62, is charged with making the Church’s social teaching more widely known and practiced around the world.

He will be in Washington to deliver the plenary address of the 2011 Catholic Social Ministry Gathering, Feb. 13-16. The gathering, on the theme of “Protecting Human Life and Dignity: Promoting a Just Economy,” is sponsored by 19 Catholic organizations, including the U.S. Catholic bishops.

In a recent interview with CNA, Cardinal Turkson said he has learned from past experience that the Church’s justice and peace terminology often needs clarification for an American Catholic audience. Key terms used by the Vatican — such as “social justice” and “gift” — are not always understood the way the Vatican intends, he said.

"We found out that some of the vocabulary which is just taken for granted and used freely may not always have the same sense or may have had some nuances which sometimes are missed because of the way the terms are used in the American political context,” Cardinal Turkson said in a Jan. 12 interview at the council’s offices in Rome.

Pope Benedict XVI appointed Cardinal Turkson to his post in Oct. 2009, just months after the Pope released his blueprint for the Church’s social teaching, “Caritas in Veritate” (Charity in Truth). The council has since made promotion of the Pope’s vision a top priority.

The encyclical outlines Pope Benedict’s plan for "integral human development" in economics, society and politics through the principles of charity and truth.

Cardinal Turkson said the Vatican is pleased by response to the document. But he said reaction from some sections of the audience in the United States was unexpected.

The council has been surprised to find that common terms were misunderstood or misinterpreted. He emphasized that the misunderstanding was not a general or widespread problem among American Catholics. But, he said, "in certain circles ... there is a difficulty."

For instance, the Pope's teaching on themes of "social justice" have been mistakenly connected to "socialism" and "communism." As a result, he indicated, the Pope is mistakenly seen as promoting socialist or big-government solutions to social problems.

The council has also learned that words like "social" and "solidarity" may have been dismissed by American readers for their perceived connection with communist regimes such as the Soviet Union, he said.

Cardinal Turkson explained that in the Church’s thinking, social justice involves citizens’ obligations and responsibilities to ensure fairness and opportunity in their communities and societies.

While this may include the adoption of specific government policies and programs, the emphasis in Catholic social teaching is on the obligations that flow from citizens' relationships in societies.

"Respecting, understanding and fulfilling those demands constitute our justice," he said. "It would be useful if we just observed our sense of justice as our ability to fulfill the demands of the relationships in which we stand."

This is in contrast to socialism, he explained, which is an ideology in which private property and private interests are totally placed in the service of government policies.

What the Pope proposes in “Caritas in Veritate,” said Cardinal Turkson, is "achieving the common good without sacrificing personal, private interests, aspirations and desires."

Cardinal Turkson said the Council was also surprised that the Pope’s concept of the “gift,” was perceived in some circles as encouraging government welfare handouts.

In "Caritas in Veritate," Pope Benedict described the concept of “gift” as a way to understand God’s love for men and women in his gift of life and his gift of Jesus.

"Truth is the light that gives meaning and value to charity," the Pope wrote. "That light is both the light of reason and the light of faith, through which the intellect attains to the natural and supernatural truth of charity: it grasps its meaning as gift, acceptance, and communion."

Gift, Cardinal Turkson explained, is "a very basic, deep theological expression of God's relation or the motivation for whatever God does in the world, and it's not quite the same as a handout."

"If we ever need to talk about this in a society where the sense of gift is that of a handout ... it doesn't quite express the sense of gift in this regard," he added.

While it is too late to add any explanations to the encyclical, the Council might tailor its language differently in future documents.

"We just realized that probably in the future, when ... this dicastery takes up the task of diffusing, presenting and talking about this it might be necessary to provide a footnote in which some of these expressions can be given an awareness of the different senses of expressions in different cultures and settings,” he said. We thought something like that would be useful and helpful to the readers."

Cardinal Turkson urged American Catholics and government and economic leaders to give a conscientious reading of "Caritas in Veritate."

The encyclical, he said, invites us "to go back or to remind about the centrality of the human person, his well being, his common good within everything that we do.”

Another important message, Cardinal Turkson said, is that “we must not sacrifice the good of the human person for anything that we aspire after or want to do with technology, business, economics or whatever."

The key to an authentically human vision of development is to consider the full ethical character of the individual in all decisions, he said.

"In details," he concluded, "it may be for food security and shelter for all persons, but at the end of the day we are looking at whether things that we are doing in the world as government, as a Church and all of that help advance the good of the individual person."
.


Source
.
Read more at endrtimes.blogspot.com