ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Defend doctrine, but don't attack others, pope says at audience

Amplify’d from endrtimes.blogspot.com


Defend doctrine, but don't attack others, pope says at audience

POPE-AUDIENCE Feb-9-2011 (460 words) With photos. xxxi
Pope Benedict XVI acknowledges pilgrims during his general audience in Paul VI hall at the Vatican Feb. 9. (CNS/Paul Haring)


By Cindy Wooden
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Even in the midst of the upheaval of the Protestant Reformation in Germany, St. Peter Canisius knew how to defend Catholic doctrine without launching personal attacks on those who disagreed, Pope Benedict XVI said.

St. Peter, a 15th-century Jesuit sent on mission to Germany, knew how to "harmoniously combine fidelity to dogmatic principles with the respect due to each person," the pope said Feb. 9 at his weekly general audience.

The pope was beginning a series of audience talks about "doctors of the church," who are theologians and saints who made important contributions to Catholic understanding of theology.

In St. Peter Canisius' own time, more than 200 editions of his catechisms were published, the pope said, and they were so popular in Germany for so long that up until "my father's generation people called a catechism simply a 'Canisius.'"

The saint, who was born in Holland, insisted there was a difference between willfully turning away from the faith and "the loss of faith that was not a person's fault under the circumstances, and he declared to Rome that the majority of Germans who passed to Protestantism were without fault," Pope Benedict said.

"In a historical period marked by strong confessional tensions, he avoided -- and this is something extraordinary -- he avoided giving into disrespect and angry rhetoric. This was rare at that time of disputes between Christians," the pope said.

In fact, he said, St. Peter Canisius recognized that the Catholic Church needed to be renewed and revitalized, and that such a process had to be built on solid education in the faith and in understanding the Scriptures, which is why his catechisms relied so heavily on the Bible.

His theological achievements, which earned him the title "doctor of the church" in 1925, were effective because his study, preaching and writing all flowed from a personal friendship with Christ, long periods of prayer and unity with the church under the leadership of the pope, he said.

With "peace, love and perseverance" he accomplished his task of renewing the Catholic Church in Germany even as Protestantism grew, the pope said.

The saint's life teaches Catholics today that "the Christian life does not grow except with participation in the liturgy, particularly the holy Mass on Sundays, and with daily personal prayer," the pope said. "In the midst of the thousands of activities and multiple stimuli that surround us, it is necessary each day to find moments for reflection to listen to and speak to the Lord."

St. Peter Canisius is a reminder that preaching the Gospel is effective only if the preacher has a personal relationship with Christ, is united with the church and "lives a morally coherent life," the pope said.

- - -

Editor's Note: The text of the pope's audience remarks in English will be posted online at: www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2011/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20110209_en.html.

The text of the pope's audience remarks in Spanish will be posted online at: www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/audiences/2011/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20110209_sp.html.

END
.


Source
.

Related

Peter Canisius
Historians of the religious conflicts of the mid 1500s have accorded Peter Canisius several nicknames: the Hammer of the Heretics, the Watchdog of Orthodoxy ...
www.companymagazine.org/v152/canisius.html - Cached

Laudem Gloriae: Hammer of the Heretics
Dec 21, 2006 ... Hammer of the Heretics. It's not inaccurate to say that, had St. Peter Canisius not brought the Catholic faith to Southern Germany with such ...
laudemgloriae.blogspot.com/2006/12/hammer-of-heretics.html - Cached

Fr. Hardon Archives - St. Peter Canisius on Christmas Joy
In the three hundred and fifty years since Peter Canisius died at Fribourg in ... He has been variously called the “hammer of heretics,” the “Second Apostle ...
www.therealpresence.org › ... › Saints and Biographies Index - Cached

Apr 27
Peter Canisius was born at Nimwegen in the Netherlands, in the very year in ... For all these reasons he was called the Hammer of the Heretics, and the ...
www.breviary.net/propsaints/propsaints04/propsaints04275.htm - Cached

St. Peter Canisius
Peter Canisius was born at Nymwegen in the Netherlands, in the very year in which Luther ... For all these reasons he was called the Hammer of Heretics, ...
catholicharboroffaithandmorals.com/St.%20Peter%20Canisius%20popup. html - Cached

NO GREATER EVIL
HERESY & HERETICS - THE CATHOLIC VIEW. ... always received from the Church the title of "The Hammer of Heretics" for he was exemplary in his dealing with heretics with ... (St. Canisius Catholic Cate-chism, Dillingen, 1560, Question no. ...
www.catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/.../heretic.htm - Cached - Similar

The Point – January-February 1958 « Father Feeney's The Point
Aug 23, 2009... “Hammer of Heretics”; Saint John Capistrano, “Scourge of the Jews”; .... by the Church than the Jesuit theologian, Saint Peter Canisius. ...
fatherfeeney.wordpress.com/2009/.../
Read more at endrtimes.blogspot.com
 

...as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed

Amplify’d from endrtimes.blogspot.com


...as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed

Revelation 13


1And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.

2And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

3And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

4And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

5And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

6And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.

7And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.

8And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

9If any man have an ear, let him hear.

10He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.

11And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.

12And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.

13And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,

14And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

15And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.


King James Version (KJV)
Public Domain
Read more at endrtimes.blogspot.com
 

Secret of Voynich Manuscript, an Ancient Book Written in 'Alien' Code, Partly Revealed

Currently owned by Yale, the manuscript was discovered in the Villa Mondragone near Rome in 1912 by antique book dealer Wilfrid Voynich while sifting through a chest of books offered for sale by the Society of Jesus.



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/02/11/history-mystery-scientists-age-voynich-manuscript/#ixzz1DpOS95eE

Amplify’d from www.foxnews.com

Secret of Voynich Manuscript, an Ancient Book Written in 'Alien' Code, Partly Revealed

| FoxNews.com

The Voynich manuscript's unintelligible writings and strange illustrations have defied every attempt at understanding their meaning.

Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University

The Voynich manuscript's unintelligible writings and strange illustrations have defied every attempt at understanding their meaning.

Part of the mystery behind an 'alien' book no one can read has at last been unraveled.

Found in a chest of books outside Rome by a dealer in antique books, the Voynich manuscript is among literature's great mysteries. The book of aging parchment is written in alien characters, some resembling Latin letters, others unlike anything used in any known language, and arranged into what appear to be words and sentences -- except they don't resemble anything written or read by human beings. 

And for decades, the manuscript has mystified scientists. 

"Is it a code, a cipher of some kind?" asked Greg Hodgins, a physicist with the University of Arizona. "People are doing statistical analysis of letter use and word use -- the tools that have been used for code breaking. But they still haven't figured it out," Hodgins said. 

The DaVinci Code was fiction. The Voynich manuscript is real -- and its code remains one of history's biggest mysteries. But at least Hodgins has solved part of the mystery behind the book: it's age. 

Because the parchment pages of the Voynich manuscript were made from animal skin, they can be radiocarbon-dated. Hodgins, a chemist and archaeological scientist, used radiocarbon dating on tiny bits of the pages extracted with a scalpel to determine that the book dates back to the early 15th century, making it a century older than scholars had previously thought.

Carbon-14 dating places the book's creation to between 1404 and 1438, in the early Renaissance. It's not the oldest book in the world -- that would be The Diamond Sutra, a seven-page scroll printed with wood blocks on paper in China around 1,300 years ago. But it's older than the Gutenberg bible, the first book printed with modern presses, which rolled off the line in 1453. 

Despite these revelations, the book -- with its alien language (possibly a coded writing) and puzzling drawings -- remains largely a mystery, said Kevin Repp, curator of modern books & manuscripts for the Beinecke Rare Book Library, which currently houses the tome.

"There are many reasons why a manuscript would have been written in code at the time," he told FoxNews.com, "fears of accusations of heresy or witchcraft among them. Then again, there is also the possibility that the manuscript doesn’t say anything at all. Some of the top researchers in the field lean toward the latter explanation, particularly since it has proven impossible using the latest computer technology to decipher the script."

Currently owned by Yale, the manuscript was discovered in the Villa Mondragone near Rome in 1912 by antique book dealer Wilfrid Voynich while sifting through a chest of books offered for sale by the Society of Jesus. Voynich dedicated the remainder of his life to unveiling the mystery of the book's origin and deciphering its meanings. He died 18 years later, without having wrestled any its secrets from the book.

Hodgins is quick to point out that anything beyond the dating aspect is outside his expertise, but he admits he is just as fascinated with the book as everybody else who has tried to unveil its history and meaning.

"There are types of ciphers that embed meaning within gibberish. So it is possible that most of it does mean nothing," he said. "There is an old cipher method where you have a sheet of paper with strategically placed holes in it. And when those holes are laid on top of the writing, you read the letters in those holes."

Hodgins is curious as to the meaning, of course, and as willing to speculate as anyone. "Who knows what's being written about in this manuscript, but it appears to be dealing with a range of topics that might relate to alchemy. Secrecy is sometimes associated with alchemy, and so it would be consistent with that tradition if the knowledge contained in the book was encoded. What we have are the drawings," he noted. "Are they botanical? Are they marine organisms? Are they astrological? Nobody knows."

"I find this manuscript is absolutely fascinating as a window into a very interesting mind. Piecing these things together was fantastic. It's a great puzzle that no one has cracked -- and who doesn't love a puzzle?"

Read more at www.foxnews.com
 

Snitches Will Enforce Bloomberg’s Latest Smoking Ban

Amplify’d from gawker.com
Snitches Will Enforce Bloomberg’s Latest Smoking Ban








Jeff Neumann


Snitches Will Enforce Bloomberg's Latest Smoking BanMayor Mike said yesterday that the NYPD won't be used to enforce the city's new ban on smoking at public beaches and in parks. So who will be monitoring the air quality of New York's public spaces? The concerned citizens of New York, that's who!

Bloomberg was speaking to a caller yesterday on his radio show about the new law, which will carry a $50 fine, and had this to say:


"This is going to be enforced by public pressure. [...] Mainly it's just everybody's going to turn to you and say, 'Hey, you shouldn't be smoking.' And you know, most people listen."


Oh, sure. Here's a mild version of what we imagine will be repeated many times across the city this summer:

"Excuse me, but would you please extinguish your cigarette? Besides being gross, it's against the law to smoke here, you know."

"Fuck you. Mind your own business, asshole."

"Okay."

The end.

[NYDN; image via AP]

Read more at gawker.com
 

The “Trinity” Is A False Doctrine

Amplify’d from 777denny.wordpress.com
Did you know that not only is the concept of the “Trinity” not taught in the scriptures and wasn’t taught by 1st century Christian leaders, and not only was it an invention due to the impetus of Constantine, but that many “Trinities” existed in Pagan religions for centuries before this concept was adopted in 325 at the First Council of Nicaea? This was the beginning of the end of separation of church and state, where the Catholic church began persecuting those that would not adhere to their false doctrines, thus heralding in the age of the false church which began to perpetually persecute, torture and murder those who chose to obey the commandments of Christ, rather than succumb to the commandments of men.
An early concept of Who Elohim is was called Arianism, after a man named Arius, who taught a non-trinitarian theology that God the Father and the Son did not exist together eternally. This belief discounts the plain teaching in the gospel of John which states the following: 1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made… He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not…And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us..”
This above scripture, along with many others, define Yahusha as being the only begotten Son of the Father sent as the Messiah to the earth to save men from paying for their sins, and Whom existed eternally with Yahuah from the beginning.
Another early teaching was called Semi-Arianism, which taught “the truly orthodox view of the Son, that he was forever with the Father,” but were considered to be blasphemers of the third person of the Trinitarian god, since they did not count the Spirit OF Elohim “in the Godhead with the Father and the Son.” These are also referred to as “binitarians,” or can be referred to as the belief in “binitarianism.”
Binitarianism is different from the “Oneness” doctrine, which asserts that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit of Elohim are all the same “Person.” This teaching is acutely insufficient to describe the Godhead, since, for instance, how could Yahusha pray to Himself in the Garden of Gethsemane? This false doctrine also violates the following scriptures:
  • Gen. 1:1, 26 – The plural word for “Elohim” is used regarding creation, indicating that Elohim (i.e., the Godhead) is composed of separate individuals.

  • Col. 1:16-19; Heb. 1:2 – Yahusha was active in creation as a separate individual.

  • Jn. 1:1  – Uses the Greek definite article, to differentiate between two divine individuals in this verse.

  • Jn. 14:23 – Yahusha uses the plural pronoun “we,” which proves He is a separate individual from the Father.

  • 1 Cor. 11:3 – Christ is the head of man, and Yahuah is the head of Christ, proving that Christ and the Father are separate individuals.

  • 2 Jn. 1:9 – John uses the word “both” to show that the Father and Son are separate individuals.

  • 1 Tim. 2:5 – Yahusha is portrayed as the mediator between man and Yahuah the Father, proving that Christ is a separate individual from the Father.

  • Rom. 8:34 – Yahusha is portrayed as seated at the right hand of Yahuah, interceding for believers, proving that He is a separate individual from the Father.

  • 1 Jn. 2:1 – Yahusha is portrayed as our Advocate in heaven, pleading our case before Yahuah, proving that He is a separate individual from the Father.

  • 1 Cor. 15:23-24 – Yahusha will hand over the kingdom to the Father at the end, proving He is a separate individual from the Father.

  • Phil. 2:10-11 – Yahusha will be exalted for eternity in heaven, and bring glory to the Father, showing that He is a separate individual from the Father.

  • Heb. 12:2 – Yahusha is in heaven, sitting at the right hand of the throne of Yahusha, proving He is a separate individual from the Father.

  • Heb. 13:8 – Yahusha is portrayed as the same for all eternity, proving that He is always a separate individual from the Father.

  • Rev. 22:1, 3 – Yahuah the Father and the Lamb (Yahusha) are two separate individuals whom we will worship in heaven.


So, if there are two Persons in the Godhead (bitheism), where did the third one come from? It seems that since the holy scriptures do not teach nor mention a Trinity, and since there isn’t any writings by early church fathers or laity concerning this concept, it essentially was started by a man named Tertullian, who lived in North Africa and died around 220 AD.


The earliest Church Fathers, (within two generations of the Apostles of Christ) are usually called the Apostolic Fathers and include Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch and Polycarp of Smyrna, and do not speak of the Holy Spirit as a Person. In addition, the Didache, or “Teaching of the Twelve Disciples,” and a strange allegory called the “Shepherd of Hermas,” do not teach of a Trinity. Athenagoras of Athens (133-190AD) wrote that the Holy Spirit was an “effluence of God, flowing forth and returning to God like a ray of the sun.”


It wasn’t until 325AD, when Constantine (a pagan syncretist and Roman catholic emperor) convened the Council of Nicaea in order to develop a statement of faith that could unify the Roman catholic church, that the doctrine of the Trinity became popularized, declaring that the Father and the Son are of the same substance (homoousios), thereby taking a decidedly anti-Arian stand. Arius was then exiled to Illyria.


And then in 381AD, the First Council of Constantinople, convened by Roman emperor Theodosius I, then emperor of the East and a recent convert to early Catholicism, drew up a dogmatic statement on the Trinity and defined the Holy Spirit as having the same divinity expressed for the Son by the Council of Nicaea 56 years earlier.


So, let’s summarize what happened concerning the developement of the Trinity:



  1. The Trinity doctrine is not taught anywhere in scripture, but trinities were common in Paganism and were prominent in Egypt and Babylon.

  2. The beginnings of recognition of this doctrine started at the Council of Nicaea approximately 325 AD, hundreds of years after the last book in the Bible was written.

  3. The Council of Nicaea was organized by the Roman Emperor Constantine in which he had the final say on matters that he had little understanding of.

  4. Creed followed creed, and eventually idols were accepted as forms that we can worship God through, and Mary was exalted to be the Mother of God and worship of the saints was sanctioned.

  5. The organized church was built on top of these creeds, which are the foundation for many of today’s churches/denominations. These denominations are different than the Body of Christ spoken of in the scriptures, proving that most denominations are still rooted in a creed and in the Trinity doctrine, with most denominations still having the Trinity Doctrine as a foundation, of which originally came from Babylon.

  6. The mother of these denominations is the Roman Catholic Church, which has murdered anywhere from tens of millions to well over 50 million people, had armies and banned access to scripture to Christians, which also is known today as the Dark Ages.
During the Reformation, the teachings and authority of the Catholic Church was challenged, with some truths becoming popular once again to the Body of Christ.
As a result many new denominations started up, but unfortunately they held onto some of the creeds, and in particular the Trinity doctrine.
The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is also responsible for burning to death millions of people, many of whom were Christians. They labeled people as heretics for things like reading scripture, translating scripture or daring to obey the scriptures instead of their traditions (traditions of men).
Most denominations today have a Statement of Faith as their foundation, and are usually based on creeds. Often Christians are required to take out membership, which often requires an acceptance of a particular Statement of Faith, even though it is unscriptural and deceives people into thinking that the denomination is the Church, and once they have membership, that they belong to the body of Christ. Anyone can agree to a Creed or Statement of Faith, yet they could be a murderer or rapist. The true Church is made up of Yahuah’s children and He dwells in them via his Spirit.

Now, let’s further establish Who Yahusha is:



  1. Yahuah has spoken to us through the Prophets and now his Son. Hebrews 1:1-6

  2. The Son is the exact brightness of Yahuah’s glory. Hebrews 1:1-6

  3. Yahusha is the image of the invisible Elohim. Colossians 1:12-16

  4. Christ is the radiance of Elohim’s glory and the exact representation of His being. Hebrews 1:1-3

  5. Yahusha is the very nature of Yahuah. Philippians 2:5

  6. Yahuah considers Yahusha part of Elohim. Hebrews 1:8,9

  7. Elohim sustains all things by his Word (Yahusha is the Word of Elohim). Hebrews 1:3, John 1:1

  8. Yahusha is before all things and in Him all things hold together. Colossians 1:15

  9. Yahusha is seated at the right hand of Yahuah. Colossians 3:1-3

  10. Yahusha inherited a name more superior to the Angels. Hebrews 1:1-6

  11. Yahusha is worthy to be worshipped by Angels. Hebrews 1:1-6

  12. Yahusha is worshiped by humans. Matthew 2:10-12, Matthew 8:2, Matthew 14:32-33, John 9:35-38, Matthew 28:8-10, Matthew 28:16-17

  13. Yahuah became a Father when he begat his Son: “You are my Son, today I have become Your Father.” Hebrews 1:1-6

  14. Yahusha is the Firstborn from the Dead. Revelation 1:4-6

  15. Yahusha has first place in everything. Yahusha is head over the Church. Ephesians 1:22

  16. Yahusha is Savior of the world (of believers). John 4:42, Titus 2:13, Isaiah 45:22, 43:11

  17. Yahusha is Yahuah’s firstborn. Hebrews 1:1-6

  18. Yahusha is Ruler and Beginning of the Creation of Elohim. Revelation 3:14

  19. Yahusha is begotten, not created. John 1:3

  20. Yahusha is “Wisdom” spoken of in Proverbs 8:22-31.

  21. The “Word” created the angels. Colossians 1:16, Psalms 148:5

  22. All judgement is given to Yahusha. John 5:22

  23. The Son is in the bosom of the Father. John 1:18

  24. Yahusha had glory with Yahuah before the world existed. John 17:5

  25. Yahusha was the “Word” of Elohim in the beginning. John 1:1

  26. All things were made by and through the “Word” of Elohim. John 1:3

  27. The “Word” of Elohim became flesh. John 1:14

  28. In Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form. Colossians 2:9

  29. Christ is the head over every power and authority. Colossians 2:10

  30. The “wind and waves obey” Christ. Luke 8:25

  31. Yahusha turned water into wine. John 2:1-11

  32. Yahusha gave sight to a man blind from birth. John 9:1-41

  33. Yahusha forgave sins on earth. Mark 2:7,10

  34. Yahusha rose from the dead a man four days in the grave. John 11:1-46

  35. Yahusha claimed He would rise His own body from the dead. John 2:18, 19, John 10:18

  36. Yahusha will reign on Earth for 1,000 years. Revelation 20:4-6

  37. Yahusha is given all authority in Heaven and Earth. Matthew 28:28

  38. All things are delivered to Yahusha from Yahuah. John 11:27

  39. Every knee will bow of those in Heaven, on earth and under the earth at the Name of Yahusha, confessing He is Adonai. Philippians 2:5-11

  40. Yahuah the Father is greater than Yahusha the Son. John 14:28

  41. When all things are finally subject to Yahusha, the Son will be subject to the Father. 1 Corinthians 15:28


Here are some early church fathers concerning the Deity of Christ:



  • Barnabas, companion of Paul (c. 70-130AD)

    “He is Lord of all the world, to whom God said at the foundation of the world, ‘Let us make man after our image, and after our likeness.’”

  • Ignatius, Bishop of the Church at Antioch (c. 105AD)

    “God Himself was manifested in human form for the renewal of eternal life”

  •  Clement of Rome, Bishop of the Church at Rome (c. 150AD)

    “Brethren, it is fitting that you should think of Jesus Christ as of God – as the Judge of the living and the dead.”

  • Irenaeus, Bishop of the Church at Lyons, Modern Day France (c. 180AD) “Thus He indicates in clear terms that He is God, and that His advent was in Bethlehem… God , then, was made man, and the Lord did Himself save us.” “He is God, for the name Immanuel indicates this.” “How can they be saved unless it was God who worked out their salvation upon earth? Or how shall man pass into God, unless God has first passed into man?”

  • Clement of Alexandria, Renowned Christian Teacher in Egypt (c. 195AD) “O the Great God! O the Perfect Child! The Son in the Father and the Father in the Son… God the Word, who became man for our sakes.” “Nothing, then, is hated by God, nor yet by the Word. For both are one – that is, God. For He has said, ‘In the beginning the Word was in God, and the Word was God.’” “The Word itself, that is the Son of God, is one with the Father by equality of substance. He is eternal and uncreated.”

  •  Hippolytus, Leading Presbyter at the Church in Rome (c. 205AD) “Although He endured the cross, yet as God He returned to life, having trampled upon death.”

  • Origen, Famous Pupil of Clement of Alexandria (c. 225AD)

    “No one should be offended that the Savior is also God, seeing God is the Father. Likewise, since the Father is called Omnipotent, no one should be offended that the Son of God is also called Omnipotent. For in this way, the words will be true that He says to the Father: ‘All mine are yours, and yours are mine, and I am glorified in them.’” “The Son is not different from the Father in substance.”


Even Pagans noted the early Christians equating Christ with Elohim:


Pliny the Younger (61-112AD), also known as Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus, was the governor of Bithynia (AD 112) and a Roman senator. When writing to emperor Trajan asking for guidance on how he should treat the Christians in his province, he wrote that Christians were “meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verse a hymn to Christ as to a god…”


And William Lane Craig, in his book, “Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics”, writes, “Studies by NT scholars such as Martin Hengel of Tubingen University, C.F.D. Moule of Cambridge, and others have proved that within twenty years of the crucifixion a full-blown Christology proclaiming Jesus as God incarnate existed…the oldest Christian sermon, the oldest account of a Christian martyr, the oldest pagan report of the Church, and the oldest liturgical prayer (1 Corinthians 16:22) all refer to Christ as Lord and God.”


Now let’s take a look at what the Holy Spirit of Elohim is:



  • The Hebrew word for ’’Spirit,’’ or ’’Ruach,’’ is breath, wind, breeze, spirit, air, and strength.

  • Acts 2:1 When the Day of Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a RUSHING, MIGHTY WIND, AND IT FILLED THE WHOLE HOUSE where they were sitting. And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.

  • John 20:22 And when he had said this, HE BREATHED ON THEM and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Spirit.

  • Ezekiel 37:4 Again he said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear the word of the LORD. Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I WILL CAUSE BREATH TO ENTER YOU, and ye shall live.

  • Ezekiel 37:9 Then said he unto me, PROPHECY UNTO THE WIND, prophesy, son of man, and SAY TO THE WIND, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live. So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.

  • John 3:8 That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes and you hear the sound of it, but do not know where it comes from and where it is going; so is everyone who is born of the Spirit.

  • In the NIV, Zechariah 6:5 refers to the “four winds of the heavens” riding in chariots, possibly the four winds of heaven going North, East, West and South.

  • The “breath” of Yahuah and the “Spirit” of Yahuah are synonymous terms (Job 4:9; Ps. 33:6; Ps. 104:29 and 30; John 3:8; Job 27:3).


There are many ways the scriptures define the Spirit OF Elohim as impersonal:



  • It is referred to as a gift (Acts 10:45; 1 Timothy 4:14).

  • We are told that the Holy Spirit can be quenched (1 Thessalonians 5:19).

  • It can be poured out (Acts 2:17, 33).

  • It is shed (Acts 2:33).

  • We are baptized with it (Matthew 3:11).

  • People can drink of it (John 7:37-39).

  • People partake of it (Hebrews 6:4).

  • People are filled with it (Acts 2:4; Ephesians 5:18).

  • It renews us (Titus 3:5).

  • It must be stirred up within us (2 Timothy 1:6).

  • It is called “the Holy Spirit of promise.”

  • It is called ”the guarantee of our inheritance.”

  • It is called “the spirit of wisdom and revelation.” (Ephesians 1:13-14, 17).

  • It is a wind (Acts 2:2).

  • It is fire (verse 3).

  • It is water (John 4:14; 7:37-39).

  • It is oil (Psalm 45:7; also Acts 10:38; Matthew 25:1-10).

  • It is a dove (Matthew 3:16).

  • It is a down payment on eternal life (2 Corinthians 1:22; 5:5; Ephesians 1:13-14, KJV).

  • The “Spirit of Yahuah” is synonymous with the “hand” and “the finger” of Elohim (Ezek. 3:14; Job 26:13; Ps. 8:3; Luke 11:20).

Here are some interesting things to consider:



  • If Elohim were a Trinity, surely Paul would have taught this concept. Yet we find no such teaching in His writings.

  • Paul’s standard greeting in his letter to the churches and to individuals was, “Grace to you and peace from Yahuah our Father and the Adonai Yahusha Christ.” The same is true of Peter in the salutations of both his epistles.

  • In all of Paul’s writings, only in 2 Corinthians 13:14 is the Holy Spirit mentioned along with the Father and Christ, and there only in connection with the “fellowship of the Holy Spirit” in which believers share. Paul describes Elohim’s Spirit as the unifying agent that brings us together in godly, righteous fellowship with one another and with the Father and Son.

  • Notice that our fellowship is of the Holy Spirit, not with the Holy Spirit. Even 1 John 1:3 tells us, “Truly our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son Yahusha Christ.”

  • Paul states that “there is one Yahuah, the Father…and one Adonai Yahusha Christ” (1 Corinthians 8:6), making no mention of the Holy Spirit as a divine person.

  • Yahusha never spoke of the Holy Spirit as a divine third person, but instead, in numerous passages He spoke only of the relationship between Yahuah the Father and Himself (Matthew 26:39; Mark 13:32; 15:34; John 5:18, 22; etc.).

  • Yahusha doesn’t mention the Holy Spirit as a person in His teachings, instead are His many statements about Himself and the Father.

  • In visions of Yahuah’s throne the Father and Christ are seen, but the Holy Spirit is never seen (Acts 7:55-56; Daniel 7:9-14; Revelation 4-5; 7:10).

  • The final and last book of the Bible to be written does not mention the Holy Spirit as a divine person, but describes “a new heaven and new earth” (Revelation 21:1) wherein “the tabernacle of Yahuah is with men, and He will dwell with them”


Here are some other things to consider about the Holy Spirit OF Elohim:



  • Anchor Bible Dictionary describes the Holy Spirit as the “manifestation of divine presence and power perceptible especially in prophetic inspiration”

  • Repeatedly the Scriptures reveal that Elohim imparted divine inspiration to His prophets and servants THROUGH the Holy Spirit.

  • Paul wrote that Yahuah’s plan for humanity had been “revealed by the Spirit to His holy apostles and prophets” (Ephesians 3:5) and that his own teachings were inspired by the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 2:13).

  • Paul explains that it is through Yahuah’s Spirit that Yahuah has revealed to Christians the things He has prepared for those who love Him.

  • Working through the Spirit, Yahuah the Father is the revealer of truth to those who serve Him.

  • Yahusha told His followers that the Holy Spirit, which the Father would send, “will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you”

  • It is through Elohim’s Spirit within us that we gain spiritual insight and understanding and come to receive the very “mind of Christ” (1 Corinthians 2:16), also referred to as the “mind of the Spirit” (Romans 8:27).

  • Christ was prophesied to have “the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord” (Isaiah 11:2).

  • Christ portrayed in His personal conduct the divine attributes of Almighty God through the power of the Holy Spirit (1 Timothy 3:16).

  • The Holy Spirit is not only the Spirit of Yahuah the Father, but it is the “Spirit of Christ” (Romans 8:9; Philippians 1:19). Remember that there is ONLY ONE Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:13; Ephesians 4:4).

  • The Father imparts the same Spirit to Christians through Christ (John 14:26; 15:26; Titus 3:5-6), leading and enabling them to be His children and “partakers of the divine nature” (Romans 8:14; 2 Peter 1:4).

  • Yahuah, Who has eternal life in Himself, gives that life to others through the Spirit (John 5:26; 6:63; Romans 8:11).

  • There is an account of the Spirit of the Lord, the Spirit of wisdom, the spirit of understanding, the spirit of counsel, the spirit of might, the spirit of knowledge and the spirit of the fear of Adonai.

  • By this Spirit Yahusha is still be present with those that love him (John): “I will come to you” (14:18); “I am in you” (14:20); and “I will show myself” (14:21).

  • Luke 21:15 tells us that Christ will give us “a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist.”

  • If Christ has a spirit and the Father has a spirit and the Holy spirit is a spirit, then why is their ONLY ONE SPIRIT? (Ephesians 4:4)

  • By definition, the Spirit of Yahuah is derived from Yahuah, so what comes from Yahuah as its source cannot also be “Yahuah.”

  • In biblical usage, “the Holy Spirit” is a synonymous term for “Yahuah.” In Acts 5:3, Peter says Ananias lied to “the Holy Spirit,” but in verse 4 Peter says he lied to “Yahuah.” This is an example of the common Semitic parallelism of equivalent terms.

  • “The Holy Spirit” is equivalent to “the power of the Most High,” as Luke 1:35 (NIV) clearly indicates by another use of parallelism (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:8;10:38; Romans 15:13; Romans 15:18 and 19; 1 Corinthians. 2:4 and 5).

  • Matthew 1:18 records that Mary “was found to be with child through ‘the Holy Spirit.’” Yet all through the New Testament are references to the fact that Yahuah is the Father of our Yahusha. How can “Yahuah” be “the Father” and “the Holy Spirit” also be “the father” of Yahusha?

  • By this Spirit Yahusha’s work with them would continue (John): “It will teach you”(14:26); “It will remind you of everything I have said” (14:26); “It will testify about me” (15:26); “It will convict the world of guilt” (in preparation for His judgment—16:8); “It will guide you into all truth” (16:13); “It will bring glory to me by taking what is mine and making it known to you” (16:14).

  • The “Holy Spirit” is used synonymously and interchangeably with “the Spirit of Yahusha” (Acts 16:7; Phil. 1:19); “the Spirit of the Lord” (Luke 4:18, etc.); “the spirit of his son” (Gal. 4:6); “the Spirit of Yahusha Christ” (Phil. 1:19). In this usage, “the Spirit” is the mind and power of Yahusha Christ.

  • In Acts 16:6 (NIV), “the Holy Spirit” kept Paul and his companions from preaching in Asia, but in Verse 7 (NIV) it says that the “Spirit of Yahusha” would not allow them to enter Bithynia.

  • 2 Corinthians 3:17 and 18 says that Adonai (Yahusha) is “the Spirit.” He has been invested with all spiritual authority and power to effectively carry out His responsibility as the Head of His body. By His “Spirit” He is able to guide and direct His many servants (2 Cor. 12:8 and 9).

  • Galatians 5:22 and 23 list the “fruit of the Spirit” (the nature of Yahusha); John 15:5 says, “If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit.”

  • The “Spirit of your Father” is synonymous with “the Holy Spirit,” and is said to speak in our stead when we might be brought before men for possible persecution or trial (Matt.10:19 and 20; Mark 13:11; Luke 12:11 and 12).

  • The Holy Spirit is the very nature, presence and expression of Elohim’s power actively working in His servants (2 Peter 1:4; Galatians 2:20).

  • Peter explains that “Yahuah anointed Yahusha of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power” (Acts 10:38).

  • Christ performed many miracles and worked through the apostle Paul “in mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of Yahuah” (Romans 15:19).

  • Yahusha began His ministry “in the power of the Spirit” (Luke 4:14).

  • Yahusha told His followers, “You shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you” (Acts 1:8).

  • Scriptures refer to the Holy Spirit as Elohim’s divine power (Zechariah 4:6; Micah 3:8).

  • Another example of the Spirit of Christ: “for Yahuah hath sent forth the Spirit of His Son into our hearts crying, Abba, Father.” (Galatians 4:6)

  • Yet another example of the Spirit of Christ: ”If any man have not the Spirit of Christ he is none of His.” (Rom. 8:9)

  • We are told that the “the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets” (1 Corinthians 14:32).

  • We are sanctified by the Spirit (2 Thess. 2:13); we are sanctified in Christ Yahusha (1 Cor. 1:2), whom Yahuah made to be sanctification for us (1 Cor. 1:30).

  •  We are strengthened by the Spirit in the inner man (Eph. 3:16); Christ dwells in our hearts (Eph. 3:17).

  • We have access to the Father by the Spirit (Eph. 2:18); in Christ and through faith in Him we have access with confidence to Yahuah (Eph. 3:12).

  • The Spirit apportions to each one individually as it chooses (1 Cor. 12:11); Yahusha pours out the Spirit (Acts 2:33) and gave some apostles, some prophets, etc. (Eph. 4:11).

  • The Spirit intercedes for us (Rom. 8:26); Christ Yahusha intercedes for us (Rom. 8:34).

  • The only verse that would indicate that there might be three persons sharing one name is Matthew 28:19: “…baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” But this verse is quoted in a different form by the early Church Fathers, notably Eusebius, who quotes the verse at least 18 times as follows: “baptizing them in My name.”

  • Both the Father and Son are shown to send the Comforter: “But the Comforter, which is the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, it shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.” John 14:26 “Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.” (John 16:7) “Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.” (Ephesians 4:8, Acts 2:33)

  • The Comforter points to and glorifies Christ.

    “But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:” (John 15:26) “Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of Yahuah calleth Yahusha accursed: and that no man can say that Yahusha is Adonai, but by the Holy Spirit.” (1 Corinthians 12:3)

  • We are told the Spirit is FROM Yahuah: “And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Spirit. And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of Yahuah. (John 1:32-34)

  • Elohim is said to be omnipresent by His “Spirit” (Job 31:4, Proverbs 5:20,21).

  • We are told that “No man hath seen Elohim at any time. If we love one another, Elohim dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us. Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit. And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world. (1 John 4:12-14)

  • We are told that Elohim is the Spirit: “Now Adonai is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of Adonai is, there is liberty.” (2 Cor 3:17).

  • Yahuah uses angels to speak as if they were Yahuah Himself, and even to use His personal name, Yahuah. (Judges 13:21-22, Genesis 32:24-30, Hosea 12:3-5, Exodus 3: 2-4,6 and 16, Judges 6:12,13 and 22)

  • The Hebrew usage of “the spirit of Elohim” never refers to a person separate from, but a part of, Yahuah Almighty. Neither does the phrase, “the spirits of Elohim” occur, which would refer to separate spiritual entities within a multipersonal Elohim.

  • The scriptures never tell us to pray to, lift up, praise, honor, sing to, speak to, glorify or otherwise venerate as deity the Spirit OF Elohim.

  • Elohim is referred to as a Spirit (John 4:24).

  • While much is said by Christ concerning His love for His Father, no such reference is made to the Spirit.

  • While scriptures mention the love the Father and Son has for Christians, no mention is made of the love of the Spirit for them.

  • It should be noted that pneuma hagion often refers to the gift of Elohim, the divine nature born inside us. This divine nature is a “thing,” not a person. Thus it should be referred to with pronouns such as “it,” “that,” or “which,” and not “who,” or “whom.”
Read more at 777denny.wordpress.com
 

6 dead, 37 injured in attack on Mexican nightclub

Amplify’d from www.usatoday.com

6 dead, 37 injured in attack on Mexican nightclub

GUADALAJARA, Mexico (AP) — Armed men opened fire and hurled a grenade into a crowded nightclub early Saturday, killing six people and wounding at least 37 in a western city whose former tranquility has been shattered by escalating battles among drug cartels.

The attack in Mexico's second-largest municipality took place just hours after a shootout between soldiers and presumed cartel gunmen left eight people, including an innocent driver, dead in the northeastern city of Monterrey. Monterrey is Mexico's third-largest city.

In the Guadalajara attack, assailants in a Jeep Cherokee and a taxi drove up to the Butter Club, located in a bar and restaurant district popular with young people, and sprayed it with bullets.

Some of the men then got out of the taxi and threw a grenade into the nightclub entrance, said a police official, who spoke to news media at the scene and left without giving his name. The gunmen fled after the pre-dawn attack, he said.

Three were killed at the scene and three more died later in hospitals, said Medical Services Director Yannick Nordin. A Venezuelan and a Colombian were among the dead.

In a press conference led by state Attorney General Tomas Coronado Olmos, authorities said the attack may have been the result of a fight between two groups hours earlier in the trendy disco. Some of the people left and returned to attack the others.

State authorities said they are studying surveillance video from inside the nightclub to help determine what happened.

While there have been isolated grenade attacks around the city, Saturday's was the first to be thrown into a crowd and cause so many injuries.

The U.S. Consulate in Guadalajara recently warned U.S. citizens not to drive at night in parts of the city after suspected drug-gang members burned vehicles and blocked streets.

Such alerts have become common for highways in some areas of northern and western Mexico, but not for Guadalajara, which is known more for its mariachi music and tequila than as a focal point of a drug war that has claimed nearly 35,000 lives since 2006.

But in recent months the picturesque colonial city has come to resemble embattled areas of northern Mexico — including the state of Nuevo Leon, where Monterrey is located.

Seven presumed cartel gunmen were shot dead by soldiers near Monterrey during a chase and shootout just after midnight Friday. A civilian was also killed when the gunmen crashed into his car as they tried to flee soldiers.

A soldier and a state police officer were wounded during the clash in the suburban city of San Nicolas, the military said in a news release.

Soldiers also freed a woman who is presumed to have been kidnapped and was traveling in one of the vehicles. Two other vehicles, carrying an unknown number of attackers, escaped, and there were no arrests, said a spokesman for the state public security office, who was not authorized to give his name.

Nuevo Leon has been hit by a wave of drug-fueled violence in recent years as the Gulf Cartel battles a gang of its former enforcers known as the Zetas.

The cartels have staged a bloody turf war over drug peddling points and smuggling routes to the U.S. border 125 miles (200 kilometers) to the north, and clashes with the military and police have become almost a daily occurrence in and around Monterrey.

In Guadalajara, the violence has heated up just in the past few months from cartels warring for turf. The city is key to western drug routes once controlled by former Sinaloa leader Ignacio "Nacho" Coronel, who was killed in a gunbattle with soldiers in July.

Read more at www.usatoday.com
 

Grand jury report: Archdiocese's policies on sex abuse by priests feeble and ineffective

By John P. Martin, Inquirer Staff Writer













Midway through the opening page of the latest grand jury report on sexual abuse by Philadelphia priests are four words as damning as any in the 124-page document:



"Much has not changed."



Five years after a previous grand jury vilified archdiocesan leaders for tolerating and protecting abusive priests, the report unsealed Thursday went a step further.



It portrayed changes implemented by the archdiocese since the scandal first unfolded as feeble, ineffective, or even deceptive.



Victims were "virtually hounded" by assistance coordinators, while accused priests weren't confronted, the panel concluded.



The review board designated to hear abuse allegations routinely ignored evidence substantiating those claims, the grand jurors contended. And at least 41 priests were left in active posts around the region after being accused of inappropriate behavior or abuse of minors.



"The evidence presented before us indicates that the Archdiocese continues to engage in practices that mislead victims, that violate their trust, that hinders prosecution of their abusers, and that leave large numbers of credibly accused priests in ministry," the report stated.



In a statement, Cardinal Justin Rigali said he could not address specific allegations until officials reviewed the report. He did, however, assert that "there are no archdiocesan priests in ministry today who have an admitted or established allegation of sexual abuse of a minor against them."



Like its 2005 predecessor, the latest report detailed in graphic terms instances of alleged abuse by priests. One case involved a 10-year-old victim who was allegedly "passed around" among two priests and a teacher at St. Jerome's Parish in Northeast Philadelphia in 1998 and 1999.



The report lauded church officials for agreeing to notify law enforcement when it receives a substantiated accusation. It noted that the archdiocese established a review board with civilians to consider abuse allegations and hired victim-assistance coordinators.



But within that structure, the grand jury found flaws that raised questions as to whether some changes were being used to protect victims - or the church itself.



The allegations involving the priests and teacher at St. Jerome's came to light in 2009, the report said. The accuser, identified in the document only as "Billy," said he reported the abuse in a phone call to an archdiocesan victim-assistance coordinator.



Instead of taking the basic information and passing it to authorities, victim assistance coordinator Louise Hagner went to Billy's house and pressed him for more details, the report said. She also notified diocesan lawyers that Billy had hired an attorney.



In another case, in 2006, Hagner allegedly insisted on interviewing a victim while he was hospitalized for a suicide attempt, then persuaded him to sign releases so the archdiocese could obtain his medical records.



According to the grand jury, that detailed information was shared with other church officials and church lawyers.



"As a strategy to uncover the truth, this contradictory policy of insisting on detailed statements from victims, while at the same time refusing to take any statements from accused priests, makes no sense," the grand jury concluded. "It is only rational as a strategy for avoiding civil and criminal liability."



A call for comment left at Hagner's home late Thursday was not returned.



The report also cast doubt on the integrity of the review board, an eight-member body of clerics and lay professionals that vets allegations.



"The Review Board finds allegations 'unsubstantiated' even when there is very convincing evidence that the accusations are true," the grand jury concluded.



In one 2007 case, it said, a 36-year-old man claimed to have been repeatedly molested decades earlier by the Rev. Joseph Gallagher, a priest at St. Mark's Parish in Bristol.



The accuser, identified only as a former altar boy named Ben, recounted vivid details of the abuse, including encounters that he said occurred in the sacristy, the rectory, the priest's car, and the priest's mother's house, the report said.



The allegation was the second in about a year involving Gallagher, the grand jury said. Other altar boys from the parish confirmed that the priest routinely asked them about masturbation during confession, and one said the priest had "improper relationships" with students but didn't elaborate, the report said.



Confronted with the accusations, Gallagher first denied them, then became "more evasive," the report said. He has since retired.



Ben later committed suicide, according to the report.



Another priest, the Rev. Stephen Perzan, was allowed to keep his ministry after allegations of abuse in 2005 and 2006 by two former residents at St. Gabriel's Hall, a delinquent home where Perzan worked in the 1990s.



Perzan flunked a lie-detector exam when asked about the allegations, the report said.



The Review Board found the allegations to be unsubstantiated. Perzan is now a parochial vicar for St. Helena Parish in Philadelphia.



Attempts to reach Perzan and Gallagher through the archdiocese were unsuccessful.




Contact staff writer John P. Martin at 215-854-4774 or jmartin@phillynews.com.