ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Archbishop Dolan Has 'No Comment' on NYC Visit of Excommunicated Priest

Amplify’d from www.huffingtonpost.com

Angela Bonavoglia


Journalist and author



On Saturday (Feb. 12), Nobel Peace Prize nominee and beloved Catholic Maryknoll priest Father Roy Bourgeois will visit New York City. He will appear in Jules Hart's award-winning documentary about the women's ordination movement in the Roman Catholic Church, Pink Smoke Over the Vatican, to be shown at Barnard College's inaugural Athena Film Festival.

Afterwards, Father Roy will participate on a panel, joined by Hart -- a once highly successful fashion model turned fearless filmmaker -- and ordained Catholic woman priest Rev. Jean Marie Marchant. Marchant is a former administrator with the Archdiocese of Boston, where she served -- before, during and for a year after her ordination -- as director of Health Care Ministry in charge of the Archdiocese's chaplaincy program, which provides pastoral care to people in more than 400 hospitals and nursing homes. I'm one of the talking heads in the film, having crossed paths with Hart on two boats -- one in Canadian waters, site of Marchant's ordination, and the other at the mouth of the three rivers in Pittsburgh at more ordinations -- while writing Good Catholic Girls: How Women Are Leading the Fight to Change the Church. I'll also be moderating the panel.

A Purple Heart recipient, Father Roy makes his home in Georgia, where he founded the School of the Americas Watch. That organization has long advocated closing the U.S. Army's Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (formerly, School of the Americas aka "School of Assassins"). There, the U.S. military has been training Latin American soldiers, some of whom have chosen to apply their new skills against their own people.

Since Father Roy will be in Archbishop Timothy Dolan's own backyard, and since Fr. Roy could even have been considered a guest of the Archdiocese under other circumstances (say, if a priest participating in a dear female friend's ordination to the Roman Catholic priesthood did not bring down the wrath of the Vatican), I thought a comment was in order.

In an e-mail, I identified myself as a Huffington Post blogger preparing a piece in which Father Roy, who was coming to New York to participate in a panel following the screening of a film about women's ordination, would figure prominently. I asked to know what the Archbishop thought of the fact that this priest, devoted for decades to the church, justice and peace, had taken this unequivocal stand for women's ordination, with all its dire consequences. I also asked if perhaps the Archbishop might be willing to further explain the Church's reasoning embodied in the new canonical guidelines that a priest who attempts the sacred ordination of a woman is committing as grave a crime as if he were raping a child, for which excommunication and a fast track to defrocking are the immediate remedies.

New York Archdiocesan spokesman Joseph Zwilling, responding in an e-mail, took a pass. "Because Father Bourgeios is a member of the Maryknoll Fathers, any statement about him should come from his order," he wrote back. "We will not be making a comment concerning him."

I followed up, asking Zwilling if, in his capacity as head of the U.S. Bishop's conference, Archbishop Dolan would at least comment on those new canonical guidelines, under which such a highly regarded priest, Fr. Roy Bourgeois, has been, and can even be more severely, sanctioned. Not even a comment offering "no comment" came to that request.

To their credit, the Maryknolls have not banished Father Roy from their order. "He has been excommunicated by Rome," spokesperson Mike Virgintino told me, "but he remains part of the Maryknoll Society," specifically, the Maryknoll Priests and Brothers. The Maryknolls did chicken out for a while there, pulling their support for School of the Americas Watch because it would look like they were supporting Fr. Roy's pro-women's ordination position. But cooler heads have prevailed and the Maryknolls are supporting the organization again.

Unfortunately, Bourgeois continues to stand pretty much alone among the entire U.S. Catholic priesthood in his public, passionate and unequivocal support for, and participation in, the women's ordination movement. In Pink Smoke, he denounces the church's ban as nothing more than sexism and a sin. In reference to the material things he could lose as a result of his excommunication and the laicization that could come next, like his pension, he says he'd "rather go to a soup kitchen" than sell out his own conscience.

I'm not surprised the Archbishop has nothing to say. Really, if you were the Archbishop, and you had to defend an indefensible ban -- one that flies in the face of church history, archaeological evidence and even a Pontifical Biblical Commission that found insufficient Scriptural grounds to exclude the possibility of women's ordination -- as well as those new canonical guidelines effectively equating ordaining a woman with molesting a child, would you have a comment?

Read more at www.huffingtonpost.com
 

There's a good reason why Benedict's not an organ donor

Amplify’d from www.christiancentury.org

There's a good reason why Benedict's not an organ donor




Feb 09, 2011





by Francis X. Rocca



VATICAN CITY (RNS) When Vatican officials announced last week that Pope
Benedict XVI's 2005 election rendered his organ donor card null and
void, they offered no specific reason for the change.


The curious history of papal body parts, however, offers some clues.


"A decision of a personal character made when (Benedict) was a
private citizen is no longer operative now that he is the head of the
Catholic Church," said the Vatican's top spokesman, the Rev. Federico
Lombardi.


Lombardi also called the idea of transplanting the organs of a man
who is already almost 84 "a little surreal."


Lombardi dismissed reports that the church preserves a dead pope's
body in order to supply holy relics in case he's declared a saint. But
Archbishop Zygmunt Zimowski, head of the Vatican's health care office,
told an Italian newspaper that one reason to keep papal remains intact
would be for "possible future veneration."


Since Benedict's five predecessors are now under formal
consideration for sainthood, it's not a huge stretch to see Benedict --
still alive and kicking -- as a possible saint-in-waiting.


And where there's a saint, there are often bodily relics to be
venerated by the faithful. Generally speaking -- at least in modern
times -- the church prefers the relics all be in one place.


Pope John Paul II, who will be beatified on May 1, is drawing as
much attention in death as he did in life. A vial of his blood, taken
during a medical examination during his last days, will be placed in the
altar of a church near Krakow, Poland, later this year.


John Paul's tomb in the grottoes under St. Peter's Basilica boosted
pilgrim traffic from just a few hundred to as many as 18,000 per day. To
accommodate

the even bigger crowds anticipated once John Paul is
beatified, the Vatican is moving his body to a more accessible chapel
upstairs in the Basilica itself.


The body of Pope John XXIII, who died in 1963 and like John Paul is
also one step away from sainthood, was placed in a glass coffin and
moved upstairs in 2001; his (intact) embalmed body was found to be
"incorrupt," or free from decay.


The burial place of the martyred St. Peter, traditionally considered
the first pope, determined the site of the basilica that bears his name.
In 1968, Pope Paul VI announced that the bones of a man found buried
under the basilica were in fact Peter's.


The most perverse tribute to the importance of papal remains came in
the ninth century, when a successor of Pope Formosus (891-896) exhumed
his nine-months-dead body and put it on trial for perjury and other
crimes.


As Notre Dame scholar Richard P. McBrien recounts in "Lives of the
Popes," Formosus' cadaver was "propped up on a throne in full pontifical
vestments" for the trial, and after his conviction, "three fingers of
his right hand (by which he swore oaths and gave blessings) were cut
off."


His body was thrown into the Tiber River, but recovered by a hermit
and eventually reburied with honors by a later pope.


Most pontiffs, of course, have been allowed to rest in peace, under
more or less grand monuments to their honor. The most famous artistic
byproduct of this custom was Michelangelo's great statue of Moses, which
he sculpted for the tomb of his patron Pope Julius II (1503-1513). The
tomb was never finished, but the statue sits today in Rome's Church of
St. Peter in Chains.


Papal funeral traditions have required special arrangements for the
disposition of their bodies. Because of a customary nine-day mourning
period before burial, the hearts and other fast-decaying internal organs
of almost all the popes from Sixtus V (1585-1590) to Leo XIII
(1878-1903) were removed before embalming.


The hearts were placed in Rome's Church of Ss. Vincent and
Anastasius, where they remain today. The rest of those popes -- their
bodies, that is -- are scattered across various churches in Rome.
Read more at www.christiancentury.org
 

Alex Jones Exposes “See Something, Say Something” as Patent Fraud

Amplify’d from www.infowars.com

Kurt Nimmo

Infowars.com

February 9, 2011

After previously attempting to call the Department of Homeland Security’s “See Something, Say Something” hotline to report criminal behavior by the government, Alex Jones on Wednesday called the White House, the Department of Homeland Security, and local law enforcement.

Alex Jones calls the White House, DHS, and local Austin law enforcement.

As we have noted, the lavishly promoted campaign rolled out at Wal-mart and other high visibility venues around the country is not intended to actually apprehend and punish criminals and would-be terrorists. It is instead a calculated propaganda device designed to foster and expand the phony and profitable war on manufactured terror and decidedly acclimate citizens to an ever encroaching police state.

In addition to the Wal-mart gimmick unleashed with sickening fanfare, the government released three soap opera-like PSA videos portraying ordinary everyday activities as ominous signs of possible terrorism. The videos produced with tax payer money indoctrinate the public and demand they assume the role of domestic spies reporting on their friends, neighbors, coworkers and strangers alike.

Alex contacted the White House to report that calls placed to publicly published “See Something, Say Something” telephone numbers are going to voicemail. He also wanted to talk to somebody about White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer’s attack on a Prison Planet.com report about the controversy surrounding the Obama administration’s agenda to bankrupt the coal industry and its connection to blackouts across the country last week.

After a recording informed him that he would need to wait in order to leave a message for the president – as if the president actually listens to such messages — he hung up and redialed, this time with the intention of talking to Dan Pfeiffer.

After the operator at the White House placed him on hold for a period of time, Jones called the Department of Homeland Security in a follow-up to a call he made in December of last year to report illegal activities at the Pentagon. He also wanted to inform the agency calls reporting suspicious activity are going to voicemail without response.

A man at DHS told Alex he would need to contact local law enforcement in order to make a report about terrorist activity.

In response, Jones asked to talk with the Department of Homeland Security’s press officer. A woman at the DHS Public Affairs office told him he would need contact the FBI.

She had no idea how to respond when Jones pointed out that purported al-Qaeda terror mastermind Anwar Al-Awlaki – the man who supposedly helped plot the aborted Christmas Day bombing, the Fort Hood shooting, the Times Square bombing attempt, and who also preached to the alleged September 11 hijackers – dined at the Pentagon just months after 9/11. Flummoxed, the DHS employee suggested Alex contact Pentagon security.

Finally, Alex called local law enforcement and the threat fusion center in Austin, Texas. After describing to an incredulous police employee that terrorism is run out of the Pentagon, she responded by asking how that pertains to local law enforcement. Finally, an attempt to route his call to the intelligence unit resulted in voicemail.

Alex Jones’ effort to report terrorism – following instructions doled out by government bureaucrats – is an effort in futility. Obviously, the ludicrous “See Something, Say Something” program is nothing if not a brazen propaganda effort by the government to convince the public that a sincere and ominous terror threat exists when in fact the pathetic terrorists held up by the government are mostly clueless and mentally deficient patsies and ineffectual miscreants tricked and duped by FBI informants and agents provocateurs.

Indeed, there is no mechanism available to report terrorism because it does not exist. “See Something, Say Something” is an empty public relations shell designed to prop up and support government created and supported terrorism.

It is not intended to protect us, as the government claims, and that is what Alex’s effort today so clearly and plainly revealed.

Read more at www.infowars.com
 

Former priest who lives in York Co. accused of stealing nearly $500,000 from Reading church

Amplify’d from www.inyork.com

Former priest who lives in York Co. accused of stealing nearly $500,000 from Reading church

Richard Nachajski, who now lives in York County, is charged with theft from when he served at a Reading church.

Richard Nachajski (Submitted)

York, PA - A former priest - who now lives in York County - has been charged with embezzling money from the Reading church where he was pastor for more than 15 years, according to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Allentown.


The Berks County District Attorney's Office said Richard Nachajski used funds left to the church by two deceased parishioners, wrote checks with church funds payable to himself and bought a time share in Mexico.


The funds totaled $476,093, according to a news release from the district attorney's office.


Nachajski, 64, of the 1100 block of Glendale Road in Spring Garden Township, was pastor at St. Anthony of Padua Church in Reading from 1992 to 2009.


When he took a leave of absence from his church, it was with the idea that he was leaving the priesthood, said Matt Kerr, spokesman for the diocese.


When Nachajski left, the diocese conducted an audit, as is routine when any pastor leaves, and discovered the missing money, Kerr said.


Berks County detectives began an investigation, and on Wednesday, arraigned Nachajski at District Judge Stuart Kennedy's office in Reading. Nachajski was released on $25,000 unsecured bail. Efforts to reach him for comment Wednesday were unsuccessful.


Nachajski is expected at Reading's Central Court for a preliminary hearing Feb. 25, according to Kennedy's office. If convicted, Nachajski faces a maximum sentence of 17 years in prison, a fine in excess of $40,000, and restitution.


Joe Aponick, spokesman for the Diocese of Harrisburg, where Nachajski would have to be registered if he was living in York County and still working as a priest, said, "We have no association or connection with him in any fashion."


"My understanding is that when he left Allentown, he got married," Aponick said. Nachajski was listed in a York County marriage application filing in 2009.



Detectives investigate



Following Nachajski's departure, the Allentown diocese's audit of St. Anthony's finances revealed suspicious purchases, unaccounted funds, and an unknown bank account, according to the Berks County District Attorney's Office.


Kerr said the diocese contacted the district attorney's office in November 2009 because of the audits findings. The diocese and the parish cooperated fully in the investigation, Kerr said.


"The parish intends to file an insurance claim and expects to be reimbursed for much of the money that was allegedly misspent," Kerr said.


For the next year-and-a-half, Berks County detectives investigated the allegations. Using two investigative grand jury subpoenas and seven search warrants, detectives seized credit card records, bank records, various purchases and service records dating back to 2002. They acquired official copies of two wills filed in Berks County and assessment and transaction records from York County and Pike County.


Examining the records, detectives found that Nachajski used funds left to the church by two deceased parishioners and that those funds were transferred between various accounts that only he knew about and had access to, according to the district attorney's office.


With church funds, Nachajski wrote more than $325,000 in checks made payable to him and to various financial institutions for credit card payments on purchases he made within that period of time, according to the news release.


Nachajski also used church funds to purchase a time share in Mexico for $13,000 and a vehicle for the church, which he kept after he took a leave of absence in March 2009, the district attorney's office said.


Nachajski's transactions were solely for personal use, and included travel, lodging, entertainment, restaurants, home improvements, home décor, insurance, consumable goods, and retail purchases.


"The travel expenses included payment for himself, as well as companion(s) during foreign and domestic trips," the news release states.



The charges


Here are the charges against Richard Nachajski:


· Theft by failure to make required disposition of funds received


· Theft by deception


· Theft by unlawful taking or disposition


· Receiving stolen property


· Forgery


· Securing execution of documents by deception



Background


Diocese of Allentown spokesman Matt Kerr said Richard Nachajski was ordained as a priest in 1971, and served as an assistant pastor at a Berks County church from 1971 to 1975.


From 1974 to 1983, Nachajski taught at a seminary in Michigan, then returned to Pennsylvania, where he served as an assistant pastor at two churches in Summit Hill, before becoming pastor of St. Anthony in 1992.

Read more at www.inyork.com
 

Dillsburg man sentenced to state prison for raping unconscious woman

Amplify’d from www.ydr.com

Dillsburg man sentenced to state prison for raping unconscious woman

Pennlive.com
A Dillsburg man who was convicted of raping an unconscious Harrisburg woman has been sentenced to 14 to 28 years in state prison by Dauphin County Judge John F. Cherry.



Jason Pate, 33, formerly of Susquehanna Township, was found having sex with the unconscious woman while checking out a report of a car break-in in December 2008.

Read the full report at Pennlive.com.






Read more at www.ydr.com
 

“See Something, Say Something” Exposed As Hoax

Amplify’d from www.infowars.com

Paul Joseph Watson

Infowars.com

February 9, 2011

See Something, Say Something Exposed As Hoax 070211top1

Given the intensity with which the Department of Homeland Security and Janet Napolitano have promoted the “See Something, Say Something” campaign, one would think the federal government would be keen on receiving reports from Americans about potential terror threats. However, numerous calls to the DHS, FBI and the White House prove otherwise – the entire program is a hoax and the feds have no interest in preventing terrorism.

Alex Jones calls the White House, DHS, and local Austin law enforcement.

For the past week, both on air and off air, Alex Jones has been trying to alert the federal government to terror threats and on every occasion has been rebuffed and ignored.

On Sunday, Alex called the FBI while hosting his live radio broadcast to report terrorism. During the last half hour of today’s show (MP3 – video to follow), he called the White House and the DHS. On each occasion, the reports were met with ignored phone calls, answer phone messages that didn’t even state who was taking the message, and a complete failure to return any of the calls after messages were left.

After calling the White House a second time in an effort to talk to a real person, the line simply went dead before anyone answered.

In addition, the DHS won’t even provide the number to report terror threats and instead passes the buck to local authorities when asked, as the phone calls made by Alex Jones prove. Jones responded to numbers provided on “See Something, Say Something” flyers, only to be told by a DHS operator as well as a DHS press officer that local law enforcement were responsible for taking reports about terror threats.

Jones then tried to call the local Austin Police Department but was told to call Homeland Security and was then shunted to yet another voicemail machine. On every single occasion, Jones illustrated that it is impossible to report terror threats, proving that the entire mirage of anti-terror apparatus is a complete fraud.

While the DHS sends out multi-million dollar robots to deal with coffee flasks and harmless boxes left on highways, Americans who need to report genuine instances of potential terror are completely stonewalled.

Just like the TSA stood down on the busiest travel day of the year in a crude political stunt to diffuse the effectiveness of the national opt out day protest, Homeland Security’s disinterest in taking reports about potential terrorism underscores the fact that the entire anti-terror set up is about making billions of dollars in public-private partnerships as well as creating a police state in the United States. It has nothing to do with protecting Americans from terrorism.

We invite the media to test the veracity of the point we are making this article by trying themselves to call the DHS, FBI or the White House to report terrorism. They will doubtless run into the same brick wall, proving that the entire “Say Something, See Something” campaign is a hoax that has nothing to do with preventing terrorism and everything to do with creating a chilling atmosphere wherein Americans are afraid to exercise their constitutional right to dissent for fear of being labeled an extremist.

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.

Read more at www.infowars.com
 

House Fails to Extend Patriot Act Spy Powers

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

House Fails to Extend Patriot Act Spy Powers









The House failed to extend three key expiring provisions of the Patriot Act on Tuesday, elements granting the government broad and nearly unchecked surveillance power on its own public.


The act was hastily adopted six weeks after the 2001 terror attacks. Three measures of the act are set to expire at month’s end, and the House’s lack of a two-thirds vote on Tuesday failed to move the sunsetting deadline to Dec. 8, as proposed. The vote was 277-148.


The failure of the bill, sponsored by Rep. James F. Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wisconsin), for the time being is likely to give airtime to competing measures in the Senate that would place limited checks on the act’s broad surveillance powers. The White House, meanwhile, said it wanted the expiring measures extended through 2013.


The three expiring Patriot Act provisions are:


The “roving wiretap” provision allows the FBI to obtain wiretaps from a secret intelligence court, known as the FISA court, without identifying what method of communication is to be tapped.


The “lone wolf” measure allows FISA court warrants for the electronic monitoring of a person for whatever reason — even without showing that the suspect is an agent of a foreign power or a terrorist. The government has said it has never invoked that provision, but the Obama administration said it wanted to retain the authority to do so.


The “business records” provision allows FISA court warrants for any type of record, from banking to library to medical, without the government having to declare that the information sought is connected to a terrorism or espionage investigation.


The same provisions were set to sunset in December of 2009. Congress extended the deadline until the end of February 2010 in a bid to work out compromise legislation. When that failed, lawmakers punted for a year, declaring that those measures would expire at the end of this month unless new action was taken.


“The entire justification of the last Patriot Act extension for a year was that there was no time before the deadline to consider the range of proposals. The excuse was we would have this full year to consider. And then Congress did nothing,” said Kevin Bankston, a privacy attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.


Illustration: American Civil Liberties Union


See Also:


Read more at www.wired.com
 

York County Man Accused Of Child Rape of a person younger than 13

Amplify’d from www.wgal.com

York County Man Accused Of Child Rape

Several Felony Charges Issued

SPRING GARDEN TOWNSHIP, Pa. -- Police charged a Spring Garden Township man on Tuesday man with child rape.

Sean Wilson, 28, was arrested by Spring Garden Township police on a variety of child sexual assault charges.

The charges include two counts of rape by forcible compulsion, two counts of rape threat of forcible compulsion, two counts of child rape, two counts of aggravated assault of a child and two counts of indecent assault of a person younger than 13.

Police did not say how many victims may be involved.

The charges follow a weekend investigation into a report involving sexual abuse.

Wilson is at York County Prison on $50,000 bail.


Copyright 2011 by WGAL.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Read more at www.wgal.com
 

The Priest, the Woman, and the Confessional by Charles Chiniquy,former Roman Catholic priest


The Priest, the Woman, and the Confessional by Charles Chiniquy,former Roman Catholic priest

Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.com
Royalblood: Before you continue turn your Bible to these.

  • The bible says confess faults one to another, not sins James 5:16.

  • 1Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; (self explanatory).

  • Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things , and desperately wicked: who can know it?

  • 2 Thessalonian2: 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.

    9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

    10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

    11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

    12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.


From the Book :

The Priest, the Woman, and the Confessional by Charles Chiniquy,former Roman Catholic priest
CHAPTER V.

The Highly Educated and Refined Woman in the Confessional.—What Becomes of Her Unconditional Surrender.—Her Irreparable Ruin


THE most skilful warrior has never had to display so much skill and so many ruses de guerre—he has never had to use more tremendous efforts to reduce and storm an impregnable citadel, than the confessor, who wants to reduce and storm the citadel of self-respect and honesty which God Himself has built around the soul and the heart of every daughter of Eve.

But, as it is through woman that the Pope wants to conquer the world, it is supremely important that he should enslave and degrade her by keeping her at his feet as his footstool, that she may become a passive instrument for the accomplishment of his vast and profound scheme.



In order perfectly to master women in the higher circles of society, every confessor is ordered by the Pope to learn the most complicated and perfect strategy. He has to study a great number of treatises on the art of persuading the fair sex to confess to him plainly, clearly, and in detail, every thought, every secret desire, word, and deed, just as they occurred.

And that art is considered so important and so difficult that all the theologians of Rome call it the art of arts."

Dens, St. Liguori Chevassu, the author of the "Mirror of the Clergy," Debreyne, and a multitude of authors too numerous to mention, have given the curious and scientific rules of that secret art.

They all agree in declaring that it is a most difficult and dangerous art; they all confess that the least error of judgment, the least imprudence or temerity, when storming the impregnable citadel, is certain death (spiritual, of course) to the confessor and the penitent.

The confessor is taught to make the first steps towards the citadel with the utmost caution, in order that his female penitent may not suspect at first, what he wants her to reveal; for that would generally induce her to shut for ever the door of the fortress against him. After the first steps of advance, he is advised to make several steps back, and to put himself in a kind of spiritual ambuscade, to see the effect of his first advance. If there is any prospect of success, then the word "March on!" is given, and a more advanced post of the citadel must be tried and stormed, if possible. In that way, little by little, the whole place is so well surrounded, so well crippled, denuded and dismantled, that any more resistance seems impossible on the part of the rebellious soul.

Then, the last charge is ordered, the final assault is made; and if God does not perform a real miracle to save that soul, the last walls crumble, the doors are beaten down; then the confessor makes a triumphant entry into the place; the very heart, soul, conscience, and intelligence are conquered.

When once master of the place, the priest visits all its most secret recesses and corners; he pries into its most sacred chambers. The conquered place is entirely and absolutely in his hands; he is the supreme master; for the surrender has been unconditional. The confessor has become the only infallible ruler in the conquered place—nay, he has become its only God—for it is in the name of God he has besieged, stormed and conquered it; it is in the name of God that, hereafter, he will speak and be obeyed.

No human words can adequately convey an idea of the irreparable ruin which follows the successful storming and unconditional surrender of that, once, noble fortress. The longer and stronger the resistance has been, the more terrible and complete is the destruction of its beauty and strength; the nobler the struggle has been, the more irretrievable are the ruin and loss. Just as the higher and stronger the dam is built to stem the current of the rapid and deep waters of the river, the more awful will be the disasters which follows its destruction; so it is with that noble soul. A mighty dam has been built by the very hand of God, called self-respect and womanly-modesty, to guard her against the pollutions of this sinful world; but the day that the priest of Rome succeeds, after long efforts, in destroying it, the soul is carried by an irresistible power into unfathomable abysses of iniquity. Then it is that the once respected lady will consent to hear, without a blush, things against which the most degraded woman would indignantly shut her ears. Then it is that she freely speaks with her confessor on matters, for reprinting which a printer in England has lately been sent to jail.

At first, in spite of herself, but soon with a real sensual pleasure, that fallen angel, when alone, will think on what she has heard, and what she has said in the confessional-box. Then, in spite of herself, the vilest thoughts will, at first irresistibly fill her mind; and soon the thoughts will engender temptations and sins. But those vile temptations and sins, which would have filled her with horror and regret before her entire surrender into the hands of the foe, beget very different sentiments, now that she is no more her own self-possessor and guide. The conviction of her sins is no more connected with the thought of a God, infinitely holy and just, whom she must serve and fear. The convictions of her sins is now immediately connected with the thought of a man with whom she will have to speak, and who will easily make everything right and pure in her soul by his absolution.

When the day for going to confession comes, instead of being sad, uneasy and bashful, as she used to be formerly, she feels pleased and delighted to have a new opportunity of conversing on those matters without impropriety and sin to herself; for she is now fully persuaded that there is no impropriety, no shame, no sin; nay, she believes, or tries to believe, that it is a good, honest, Christian, and godly thing to converse with her priest on those matters.

Her most happy hours are when she is at the feet of that spiritual physician, showing him all the newly-made wounds of her soul, and explaining all her constant temptations, her bad thoughts, her most intimate secret desires and sins.

Then it is that the most sacred mysteries of the married life are revealed; then it is that the mysterious and precious pearls which God has given as a crown of mercy to those whom He has made one body, one heart and soul, by the blessed ties of a Christian union, are lavishly thrown before swine. Whole hours are passed by the fair penitent in thus speaking to her Father Confessor with the utmost freedom, on matters which would rank her amongst the most profligate and lost women, if it were only suspected by her friends and relatives. A single word of those intimate conversations would be followed by an act of divorce on the part of her husband, if it were known by him.

But the betrayed husband knows nothing of the dark mysteries of auricular confession; the duped father suspects nothing; a cloud from hell has obscured the intelligence of them both, and made them blind. On the contrary,—husbands and fathers, friends and relations, feel edified and pleased with the touching spectacle of the piety of Madam and Miss —. In the village, as well as in the city, every one has a word to speak in their praise. Mrs.—is so often seen humbly prostrated at the feet, or by the side, of her confessor; Miss—remains so long in the confessional-box; they receive the holy communion so frequently; they both speak so eloquently and so often of the admirable piety, modesty, holiness, patience, charity, of their incomparable spiritual Father!

Every one congratulates them on their new and exemplary life, and they accept the compliment with the utmost humility, attributing their rapid progress in Christian virtues to the holiness of their confessor. He is such a spiritual man; who could not make rapid strides under such a holy guide?

The more constant the temptations, the more the secret sins overwhelm the soul, and the more airs of peace and holiness are put on. The more foul the secret emanations of the heart, the more the fair and refined penitent surrounds herself by an atmosphere of the sweetest perfumes of a sham piety. The more polluted the inside of the sepulchre is, the more shining and white the outside will be kept.

Then it is that, unless God performs a miracle to prevent it, the ruin of that soul is sealed. She has drunk in the poisonous cup filled by the "mother of harlots," she has found the wine of her prostitution sweet! She will henceforth delight in her spiritual and secret orgies. Her holy (?) confessor has told her that there is no impropriety, no shame, no sin, in that cup. The Pope has sacrilegiously written the word "Life" on that cup of "Death." She has believed the Pope; the terrible mystery of iniquity is accomplished!

"The mystery of iniquity doth already work, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them

that perish, because they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie; that they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." (2 Thess. ii. 7-12.)

Yes; the day that the rich, well-educated lady gives up her self-respect, and unconditionally surrenders the citadel of womanly modesty into the hands of a man, whatever be his name or titles, that he may freely put to her questions of the vilest character, which she must answer, she is lost and degraded, just as if she were the humblest and poorest servant-girl.

I purposely say "the rich and well-educated woman," for I know that there is a prevalent opinion that the social position of her class places her above the corrupting influences of the confessional, as if she were out of the reach of the common miseries of our poor fallen and sinful nature.

So long as the well-educated lady makes use of her accomplishments to defend the citadel of her womanly self-respect against the foe—so long as she sternly keeps the door of her heart shut against her deadly enemy—she is safe.

But let no one forget this: she is safe only so long as she does not surrender. When the enemy is once master of the place, I emphatically repeat, the ruinous consequences are as great, if not greater, and more irreparable than in the lowest classes of society. Throw a piece of precious gold into the mud, and tell me if it will not plunge deeper than the piece of rotten wood.

What woman could be nobler, purer, and stronger than Eve when she came from the hands of her Divine Creator? But how quickly she fell when she gave ear to the seducing voice of the tempter! How irreparable was her ruin when she complacently looked on the forbidden fruit, and believed the lying voice which told her there was no sin in eating of it!

I solemnly, in the presence of the great God, who ere long, will judge me, give my testimony on this grave subject. After 25 years' experience in the confessional, I declare that the confessor himself encounters more terrible dangers when hearing the confessions of refined and highly educated ladies, than when listening to those of the humbler classes of his female penitents.

I solemnly testify that the well-educated lady, when she has once surrendered herself to the power of her confessor, becomes at least as vulnerable to the arrows of the enemy as the poorer and less educated. Nay, I must say that, once on the downhill road of perdition, the high-bred lady runs headlong into the pit with a more deplorable rapidity than her humbler sister.

All Canada is witness that a few years ago, it was among the highest ranks of society that the Grand Vicar Superior of the college of Montreal, was choosing his victims, when the public cry of indignation and shame forced the Bishop to send him back to Europe, where he, soon after, died. Was it not also among the higher classes of society that a superior of the Seminary of

Quebec was destroying souls, when he was detected, and forced, during a dark night, to fly and conceal himself behind the walls of the Trappist Monastery of Iowa?

Many would be the folio volumes which I should have to write, were I to publish all that my twenty five years' experience in the confessional has taught me of the unspeakable secret corruption of the greatest part of the so-called respectable ladies, who have unconditionally surrendered themselves into the hands of their holy (?) confessors. But the following fact will suffice for those who have eyes to see, ears to hear, and an intelligence to understand:

In one of the most beautiful and thriving towns along the St. Lawrence River, lived a rich merchant. He was young, and his marriage with a most lovely, rich and accomplished young lady had made him one of the happiest men in the land.

A few years after his marriage, the Bishop appointed to that town a young priest, really remarkable for his eloquence, zeal, and amiable qualities; and the merchant and the priest soon became connected by links of the most sincere friendship.

The young, accomplished wife of the merchant soon became the model woman of the place under the direction of her new confessor.

Many and long were the hours she used to pass by the side of her spiritual father to be purified and enlightened by his godly advices. She soon was seen at the head of the few who had the privilege of receiving the holy communion once a week. The husband, who was a good Raman Catholic himself, blessed God and the Virgin Mary, that he had the privilege of living with such an angel of piety.

Nobody had the least suspicion of what was going on under that holy and white mantle of the most exalted piety. Nobody, except God and His angels, could hear the questions put by the priest to his fair penitent, and the answers made during the long hours of their tete-a-tete in the confessional-box. Nobody but God could see the hellish fires which were devouring the hearts of the confessor and his victim! For nearly one year, both the young priest and his spiritual patient enjoyed, in those intimate and secret conversations, all the pleasure which lovers feel when they can speak freely to each other of their secret thoughts and love.

But this was not enough for them. They both wanted something more real; though the difficulties were great, and seemed insurmountable. The priest had his mother and sister with him, whose eyes were too sharp to allow him to invite the lady to his own house for any criminal object, and the young husband had no business, at a distance, which could keep him long enough out of his happy home to allow the Pope's confessor to accomplish his diabolical designs.

But when a poor fallen daughter of Eve has a mind to do a thing, she very soon finds the means, particularly if high education has added to her natural shrewdness.

And in this case, as in many others of a similar nature which have been revealed to me, she soon found out how to attain her object without compromising herself or her holy (?) confessor. A plan was soon found and cordially agreed to; and both patiently awaited their opportunity.

"Why have you not gone to mass to-day and received the holy communion, my dear?" said the husband. "I had ordered the servant-man to put the horse in the buggy for you, as usual."

" I am not very well, my beloved; I have passed a sleepless night from headache."

"I will send for the physician," replied the husband.

"Yes, my dear; do send for the physician—perhaps he will do me good."

One hour after the physician called, and he found his fair patient a little feverish, pronounced that there was nothing serious, and that she would soon be well. He gave her a little powder, to be taken three times a day, and left; but at 9 P. M., she complained of a great pain in the chest, and soon fainted and fell on the floor.

The doctor was again immediately sent for, but he was from home; it took nearly half an hour before he could come. When he arrived the alarming crisis was over—she was sitting in an arm-chair, with some neighboring women, who were applying cold water and vinegar to her forehead.

The physician was really at a loss what to say of the cause of such a sudden illness. At last, he said that it might be an attack of "ver solitaire." (tapeworm). He declared that it was not dangerous; that he knew how to cure her. He ordered some new powder to be taken, and left, after having promised to return the next day. Half an hour after, she began to complain of a most terrible pain in her chest, and fainted again; but before doing so, she said to her husband:

"My dear, you see that the physician understands absolutely nothing of the nature of my disease. I have not the least confidence in him, for I feel that his powders make me worse. I do not want to see him any more. I suffer more than you suspect, my beloved; and if there is not soon a change, I may be dead to-morrow. The only physician I want is our holy confessor; please make haste to go and get him. I want to make a general confession, and to receive the holy viaticum (communion) and extreme unction before I grow worse."

Beside himself with anxiety, the distracted husband ordered the horse to be put in the buggy, and made his servant accompany him on horseback, to ring the bell, while his pastor carried "the good god" (Le Bon Dieu) to his dear sick wife.

He found the priest piously reading his breviarium (his book of daily prayers), and admired the

charity and promptitude with which his good pastor, in that dark and chilly night, was ready to leave his warm and comfortable parsonage at the first appeal of the sick. In less than an hour, the husband had taken the priest with "the good god" from the church to the bedroom of his wife.

All along the way, the servant-man had rung a big hand-bell, to awaken the sleeping farmers, who, at the noise, had to jump, half naked, out of their beds, and worship, on their knees, with their faces prostrate in the dust, "the good god" which was being carried to the sick by the holy (?) priest.

On his arrival, the confessor, with every appearance of sincere piety, deposited "the good god" (Le Bon Dieu) on a table richly prepared for such a solemn occasion, and, approaching the bed, leaned his head towards his penitent, and inquired how she felt.

She answered him, "I am very sick, and I want to make a general confession before I die."

Speaking to her husband, she said, with a fainting voice, "Please, my dear, tell my friends to withdraw from the room, that I may not be distracted when making what may be my last confession."

The husband respectfully requested the friends to leave the room with him, and shut the door, that the holy confessor might be alone with his penitent during her general confession.

One of the most diabolical schemes, under the cover of auricular confession, had perfectly succeeded. The mother of harlots, the great enchantress of souls, whose seat is on the city of the "seven bills," had, there, her priest to bring shame, disgrace, and damnation, under the mask of Christianity.

The destroyer of souls, whose masterpiece is auricular confession, had, there, for the millionth time, a fresh opportunity of insulting the God of purity through one of the most criminal actions which the dark shades of night can conceal.

But let us draw the veil over the abominations of that hour of iniquity, and let us leave to hell its dark secrets.

After he had accomplished the ruin of his victim and most cruelly and sacrilegiously abused the confidence of his friend, the young priest opened the door of the room and said, with a sanctimonious air, "You may now enter to pray with me, while I give the last sacrament to our dear sick sister."

They came in: "the good god" (Le Bon Dieu) was given to the woman; and the husband, full of gratitude for the considerate attention of his priest, took him back to his parsonage, and

thanked him most sincerely for having so kindly come to visit his wife in so chilly a night.

Ten years later I was called to preach a retreat (a kind of revival) in that same parish. That lady, then an absolute stranger to me, came to my confessional-box and confessed to me those details as I now give them. She seemed to be really penitent, and I gave her absolution and the entire pardon of her sins, as my Church told me to do. On the last day of the revival, the merchant invited me to a grand dinner. Then it was that I came to know who my penitent had been. I must not forget to mention that she had confessed to me that, of her four children, the last three belonged to her confessor! He had lost his mother, and, his sister having married, his parsonage had become more accessible to his fair penitents, many of whom had availed themselves of that opportunity to practice the lessons they had learned in the confessional. The priest had been removed to a higher position, where he, more than ever, enjoyed the confidence of his superiors, the respect of the people, and the love of his female penitents.

I never felt so embarrassed in my life as when at the table of that so cruelly victimised man. We had hardly begun to take our dinner when he asked me if I had known their late pastor, the amiable Rev. Mr. —.

I answered, "Yes, sir, I know him."

"Is he not a most accomplished priest?"

"Yes, sir, he is a most accomplished man," I answered.

"Why is it," rejoined the good merchant, "that the Bishop has taken him away from us? He was doing so well here; he had so deservedly earned the confidence of all by his piety and gentlemanly manners that we made every effort to keep him with us. I drew up a petition myself, which all the people signed, to induce the Bishop to allow him to remain in our midst; but in vain. His lordship answered us that he wanted him for a more important place, on account of his rare ability, and we had to submit. His zeal and devotedness knew no bounds; in the darkest and most stormy nights he was always ready to come to the first call of the sick; I shall never forget how quickly and cheerfully he responded to my appeal when, a few years ago, I went, on one of our most chilly nights, to request him to visit my wife, who was very sick."

At this stage of the conversation, I must confess that I nearly laughed outright. The gratitude of that poor dupe of the confessional to the priest who had come to bring shame and destruction to his house, and the idea of that very man going himself to convey to his home the corruptor of his own wife, seemed to me so ludicrous that for a moment, I had to make a superhuman effort to control myself.

But I was soon brought to my better senses by the shame which I felt at the idea of the unspeakable degradation and secret infamy of the clergy of which I was a member. At that instant, hundreds of instances of similar, if not greater, depravity, which had been revealed to

me through the confessional, came to my mind, and distressed and disgusted me so that my tongue was almost paralysed.

After dinner, the merchant asked his lady to call the children that I might see them, and I could not but admire their beauty. But I do not need to say that the pleasure of seeing these dear and lovely little ones was much marred by the secret, though sure, knowledge I had, that the three youngest were the fruits of the unspeakable depravity of auricular confession in the higher ranks of society.
Read more at thetruthandthetruthalone.blogspot.com
 

British man discovers 30-year-old link to girlfriend

Amplify’d from www.couriermail.com.au



British man discovers 30-year-old link to girlfriend



  • By Alastair Taylor at Sky News
Message in a bottle


Mandy was just 13 when she hurled the note requesting a pen pal into the sea during a 1979 school visit to Scotland / AAP
Source: AAP

  • Couple discover 30-year-old link
  • First met through message in a bottle
  • Became a couple thirty years later


BRITISH man Richard Morwood discovered his girlfriend was the same girl whose message in a bottle he answered 30 years ago, The Sun reported today.

Mandy English was just 13 when she hurled the note requesting a pen pal into the sea during a 1979 school visit to Scotland.

Two years later, Morwood - then just six years old - spotted the glass bottle on the beach and sent a reply by postcard.

English never wrote back, but while sorting through keepsakes last week, she found the 1981 card and realised its sender had the same name as Morwood, her boyfriend since June.

She asked Morwood, 36, of Hull in northern England, if he remembered the message in the bottle - and it suddenly dawned on them that they had "met" before.

"It was amazing. I then realised he was the little lad who sent me that lovely postcard all those years ago. I was so shocked I nearly passed out. It's crazy that it was Richard who wrote to me," said English, now a 44-year-old mother of three.

Morwood added, "When Mandy asked if I remembered sending a postcard, I said I had a vague recollection of finding the message, then my mum coaxing me into writing back. I couldn't believe it when Mandy told me she was the one who had put the message in the bottle. It's bizarre."

Read more about about the couple at The Sun
 

Read more at www.couriermail.com.au