ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

WND readers and editors identify 10 most underreported news events

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

What was the most covered-up story of 2010?

WND readers and editors identify 10 most underreported news events

By Bob Unruh




© 2011 WorldNetDaily


Tim Adams, a former senior elections clerk for Honolulu, now teaches English at Western Kentucky University.

A senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu during the 2008 presidential election burst onto the national media scene in June when WND reported his allegation that there is no Hawaiian birth certificate for Barack Obama.

But the disclosures from the elections insider regarding one of the most controversial issues of the day – the constitutional legitimacy of a president – was ignored by most of the media, thus putting Adams' story at the top of WND's annual list of the 10 most "spiked" or underreported stories of the last year.

At the end of each year, many news organizations typically present their retrospective replays of what they consider to have been the top news stories of the previous 12 months.

WND's editors, however, long have considered it more newsworthy to publicize the most underreported or unreported news events of the year – to shine a spotlight on those issues that the establishment media successfully "spiked."

WND Editor and CEO Joseph Farah has sponsored "Operation Spike" every year since 1988, and since founding WND in May 1997, has continued the annual tradition.

Adams' statements conflicted directly with repeated affirmations by public officials in Hawaii that they had seen or had inspected Obama's birth records that would document his representations that he was born in the state.

The issue of his birth is pertinent insofar as it plays a role in his status as a "natural born citizen" under the Constitution's requirement for presidents, a demand not imposed on any other federal office-holder.

Many critics are challenging, politically, legally and strategically, Obama's eligibility to occupy the high office, command U.S. troops, determine foreign policy and run domestic functions, including his initiatives early in his tenure to take over banks, insurance companies and automobile companies as well as nationalize health care.

Produced with the help of WND readers, here are the WND editors' picks for the 10 most underreported or unreported stories of 2010:

1. Elections official Tim Adams claims there is no Hawaiian birth certificate for Barack Obama.

WND reported on Adams, a college instructor who worked as senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu in 2008, when he made the stunning claim Barack Obama definitely was not born in Hawaii as the White House maintains.

He reported that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Obama does not even exist in the Aloha State.

"There is no birth certificate," said Adams, a graduate assistant who teaches English at Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green. "It's like an open secret. There isn't one. Everyone in the government there knows this."



Adams, who said he was a Hillary Clinton supporter who ended up voting for John McCain when Clinton lost the Democratic nomination to Obama, told WND, "I managed the absentee-ballot office. It was my job to verify the voters' identity."

"I had direct access to the Social Security database, the national crime computer, state driver's license information, international passport information, basically just about anything you can imagine to get someone's identity," Adams said. "I could look up what bank your home mortgage was in. I was informed by my boss that we did not have a birth record [for Obama]."

He said his office checked with both Honolulu hospitals – Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu as well as the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children across town – that had been identified at different times by the press as Obama's birth hospital.

"They told us, 'We don't have a birth certificate for him,'" he said. "They told my supervisor, either by phone or by e-mail, neither one has a document that a doctor signed off on saying they were present at this man's birth."

To date, no Hawaiian hospital has provided documented confirmation that Obama was born at its facility.




Image of an original long-form birth certificate of Susan Nordyke, born in Honolulu the day after Obama's reported birth date. President Obama has never produced a similar document.



WND confirmed with Hawaiian officials that Adams was indeed working in their election offices during the last presidential election. However, they told WND they have no access to birth records.

"They may say, 'We don't have access to that.' The regular workers don't, the ones processing ballots; but the people in administration do," said Adams, "I was the one overseeing the work of the people doing the balloting."


Short-form Certification of Live Birth image, which is not the same as a long-form, hospital-generated Certificate of Live Birth, released by the Obama campaign in June 2008.



He said what Obama posted online doesn't prove anything.

"Anyone can get that [Certification of Live Birth]," said Adams. "They are normally given if you give birth at home or while traveling overseas. We have a lot of Asian population [in Hawaii]. It's quite common for people to come back and get that."

2. Army officer court-martialed, jailed, after questioning Obama's eligibility.

A related story WND documented was that of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, now imprisoned in Ft. Leavenworth for disobeying Afghanistan deployment orders based on the refusal by the Army and the Obama White House to show proof of Obama's eligibility.








Dr. Terrence Lakin


Convicted of missing a deployment assignment and several other lesser charges, his case now is pending before Maj. Gen. Karl Horst, commanding general of forces in the Washington, D.C., region and the convening authority over Lakin's court martial.

Horst can approve Lakin's sentence, reduce it or order him released.

Lakin's case was torpedoed from the outset when the judge handling the proceedings ruled that because revelations regarding Obama's eligibility could "embarrass" the president, Lakin would not be allowed to discuss the issue, would not be permitted to bring forth evidence regarding eligibility, would not be allowed to bring in witnesses on the issue, and would not be allowed to pose any of his questions.

The judge, Col. Denise Lind, also ruled that Lakin would not be allowed any discovery to obtain existing evidence that might document his case.

Lakin was sentenced to six months confinement, forfeiture of pay and allowances, and dismissal from the service for disobeying orders. His supporters have established a fund to support Lakin's legal defense and provide for the needs of his wife and children while he is incarcerated at Leavenworth.








3. The reality of the U.S. economy is being assessed as a major issue by those who know, but has been getting little to no media attention. Very real questions about impossible deficits and skyrocketing taxes haven't earned much network time.

In fact, the stock market's modest rebound over the course of 2010 was being hailed by administration officials as an indicator of a turnaround and when numbers of new applications for unemployment benefits didn't rocket, it was called an advance.

But in reality, WND reported on the estimated $3 trillion in unfunded government pension liabilities even as there was discussion of a possible Value Added Tax on everything in the country.

"Everything" seemed to be a popular target for taxes, as WND reported Democrats proposed another plan to raise $4.4 trillion through a fee on each and every "transaction" across the country.

The hard facts that nobody wants to see are that the U.S. dollar today is backed only by "promises" from the same politicians who created today's economic disaster, according to longtime monetary expert Craig R. Smith who documented that the nation already faces some $120,000,000,000,000 ($120 trillion) in debt, deficit and unfunded liabilities.

The situation has gotten so bad former Libertarian vice presidential nominee Wayne Allyn Root wrote that based on the direction of the U.S. economy, he was beginning to miss George.

Not George W. Bush, the president, but another George.

"President Obama and his cabal of socialists and fascists are so bad, so oppressive, so corrupt, I'm actually starting to miss King George III, the ruler of the original American colonies," he said.

"King George III may have taxed the colonies too much with his Stamp Act, thereby inspiring the history-changing American Revolution – but as oppressive as King George was, he did provide something in return for the taxes: military protection and a navy. … The question for taxpayers today is: Are things really any better? Have we traded King George for a series of homegrown despots?"





4. America's move toward socialism continued, even though it never in 2010 got attention like Obama's remark to "Joe the Plumber" about just wanting to "spread the wealth."

A republic is based on personal responsibility, limited government and the vote of the people, in contrast to socialism, where the state hands out what it believes citizens need and takes from them what it wants.

Has the change in the United States gone that far already?

WND reported that former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton warned that Obama's goal is just exactly that: a nation heavily influenced by socialism.

Obama's early work included programs that effectively nationalized car companies, banks, insurance companies and investment companies and this year he awarded a socialist, John Sweeney of the AFL-CIO, the nation's highest civilian honor, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

The actions of one of socialism's most active advocates in the United States, George Soros, also became more blatant, and a Soros-funded organization suggested that with the GOP taking over the U.S. House now, Obama simply should rule by executive order.

"The ability of President Obama to accomplish important change through these powers should not be underestimated," wrote John Podesta of the Center for American Progress.

5. The fall of the "mainstream" news media – as ratings drop, advertising plunges and the public distrust grows.

It's not necessarily new that the old media – television networks, newspaper conglomerates and the like – are in decline, as their viewer totals and reader numbers have been dropping for years, evidenced by the collapse of even major institutions such as the Rocky Mountain News in Denver.

But in the last year, some startling developments came up revealing just how troubled the "old" part of the media industry is, including the stunning revelation that would have been unheard of historically in the news industry, a network anchor boasting of his socialism.

MSNBC anchor Lawrence O'Donnell confirmed to viewers, "I live to the extreme left of you liberals," and, "Liberals amuse me. I am a socialist."

WND also had the report when Keith Olbermann was suspended from MSNBC for unapproved political contributions – he was backing the Democrats financially – and then again when Chris Hayes, who subbed during Olbermann's suspension, was found to have done the same thing.

WND also reported when CNN, one of the key players in reporting in decades gone by, took the time to profile Lila Rose of the cutting-edge pro-life Live Action organization, an individual on whom WND has reported since her beginning work.

CNN described her work of visiting Planned Parenthood abortion businesses under cover and catching them in inappropriate – or even illegal – situations, "guerrilla journalism."

Even CNN admitted it was because of a "growing distrust of the mainstream media…"

The politically correct banner also was raised. In a column on a page for a group of professional journalists was announced a plan to abolish the words "illegal alien" or "illegal immigrant" in reporting about the invasion into the U.S. of, well, "illegal aliens."

On the website for the Society of Professional Journalists came the explanation that the term is offensive, and only a judge can determine someone is "illegal."


6. Allegations of fraud, including illegal voting by felons and a formalized refusal by some states to follow election law regarding ballots for the military, raise the dark possibility of the manipulation of elections.

WND has reported that election irregularities are becoming more and more common, raising serious concerns about one of the bedrock principles of the republic – the integrity of the ballot box.

Some of the reports have focused on the election from 2008 in Minnesota that gave ex-comedian Al Franken a U.S. Senate seat over incumbent Norm Coleman, who had more votes at the end of the count.

Citizen investigators there have found more illegal votes – and a number of court cases have resulted – than the Franken margin of victory in a recount.

Further, during the 2010 election some states simply disregarded – or demanded an exemption to – requirements that they get ballots to members of the military, who vote more conservatively than the general population, on time for them to be returned and counted.

Other investigations have started in Kentucky, Nevada, Texas, North Carolina, Colorado, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

WND reported that in Connecticut, there even were allegations that voting by illegal aliens may have swayed the results.



7. Mysterious missile spotted off the coast of California.







Contrail was recorded in this image by KCBS-KCAL in California

One of the most mysterious stories largely left unreported was the appearance of what appeared to be a missile contrail filmed Nov. 8 by a KCBS television crew near Los Angeles.

The government said there was no danger, but has refused further explanation.

Several experts who analyzed the images, however, suggested that the missile might even have been shot from a submerged Chinese submarine, coinciding with an increasing level of confrontation between the U.S. and China.

Complicating the theory, however, was confirmation from a federal agency that it had warned the public that there would be "intermittent missile firing operations" in that area at the time.

So the questions remain: Was it a missile, and who launched it?

8. The rising tide of evidence that the rising tide from global warming is a man-made hoax.

The "Climategate" scandal, where e-mails purloined from a major global warming advocacy team at the University in East Anglia, U.K., continued to develop but got scant attention.

Author Brian Sussman warned the U.S. government was developing protocols to deal with citizens based on the East Anglia assumptions.

"Buried in the 2009 America Clean Energy and Security Act are federally mandated energy-efficient building regulations, which supersede all local and state codes and which will be enforced by a national, green goon squad, funded in part by revenues from energy taxes, as well as by an annual $25 million from the Department of Energy 'to provide necessary enforcement of a national energy efficiency building code,'" he confirms.

"The legislation also authorizes the Secretary of Energy to 'enhance compliance by conducting training and education of builders and other professionals in the jurisdiction concerning the national energy efficiency building code.'"

He continued, "The plan is modeled on building code enforcement in California. Each time a home is built, remodeled, or – in the case of the federal plan – preparing to be sold, a G-man wearing a federal badge and armed with a clipboard will show up at your house to make sure ... all of your appliances have been updated with the most recent Energy Star-approved internal communication devices, and that the Home Area Network has been properly installed and connected to your new SmartMeter, whether you like it or not."

Meanwhile, global warming investor Al Gore, the former vice president, bitterly lamented the "failure" of the government to adopt comprehensive laws taxing energy use and emissions.

He blamed the "right-wing" media for reporting on the "Climategate" e-mail scandal, where leaked e-mails from top global warming proponents appeared to manipulate the information about the issue.

One said, "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't. … The data are surely wrong."

Sen. James M. Inhofe, R-Okla., has suggested the Justice Department investigate scientists for potentially falsifying data as part of "Climategate." And the Orange County Register has posted a chart for consumers to try to keep up with all the scandals developing in the "global warming" community.

Among the scandals listed are:

  • ClimateGate: The scandal over the Climatic Research Unit e-mails from East Anglia.


  • FOIGate: In which British officials are investigating whether East Anglia scientists refused to follow that nation's freedom-of-information law about their work.


  • ChinaGate: In which dozens of weather monitoring stations in rural China apparently have simply disappeared. This would lead to higher temperature averages since city levels frequently are warmer.


  • HimalayaGate: In which an Indian climate official admitted in January that he falsely claimed Himalayan glaciers would melt away by 2035 to prod governments into action.


  • And PachauriGates I and II, SternGates I and II, AmazonGate (in which a claim that global warming would wipe out rain forests was exposed as a fraud), PeerReviewGate, RussianGate I and II and nearly a dozen others.





9. The push in the U.S. courts by homosexual advocates to demand the legalization of same-sex "marriage" as well as through Congress to formally adopt the policy of allowing open homosexual behavior in the U.S. military.

This is not a new issue, but remains beyond the reach of most traditional reporting staffs, as the demands that courts impose same-sex "marriage" on state populations and Congress allow openly homosexual lifestyles in the military became intense.

The reporting from WND, which earlier documented how homosexual activists have lost 31 out of 31 votes in states when the definition of marriage is on the ballot, revealed the strategy of avoiding voters when demanding such changes.

Much of the focus right now remains on California, where the judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals are considering whether to rubberstamp a decision by a homosexual judge that said voters had no right to amend their own state constitution, through the Proposition 8 definition that marriage is only between one man and one woman.

The judge, Vaughn Walker, on open homosexual, in September overruled more than seven million voters to banish Proposition 8, which had been approved by voters in 2008.

His 136-page ruling said, "Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples."

Walker also wrote:

  • "Religious beliefs that gay and lesbian relationships are sinful or inferior to heterosexual relationships harm gays and lesbians."


  • "Rather, the exclusion exists as an artifact of a time when the genders were seen as having distinct roles in society and in marriage. That time has passed."


  • "The gender of a child's parent is not a factor in a child's adjustment."


  • "The evidence shows beyond any doubt that parents' genders are irrelevant to children’s developmental outcomes."


  • "Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage; marriage under law is a union of equals."


  • "Many of the purported interests identified by proponents are nothing more than a fear or unarticulated dislike of same-sex couples."

His decision essentially ignored a warning from California Supreme Court Justice Marvin Baxter, who dissented when his court created same-sex "marriage" in the state, a result later overruled by voters.

He wrote, "The bans on incestuous and polygamous marriages are ancient and deeprooted, and, as the majority suggests, they are supported by strong considerations of social policy. Our society abhors such relationships, and the notion that our laws could not forever prohibit them seems preposterous. Yet here, the majority overturns, in abrupt fashion, an initiative statute confirming the equally deeprooted assumption that marriage is a union of partners of the opposite sex. The majority does so by relying on its own assessment of contemporary community values, and by inserting in our Constitution an expanded definition of the right to marry that contravenes express statutory law.

"Who can say that, in 10, 15 or 20 years, an activist court might not rely on the majority's analysis to conclude, on the basis of a perceived evolution in community values, that the laws prohibiting polygamous and incestuous marriages were no longer constitutionally justified?" Baxter wrote.

WND had the story when voters in Iowa handed homosexual activists a stunning setback, by firing three of the state Supreme Court justices who had created same-sex "marriage" in the state. The other four justices weren't on the ballot this year.

A related issue, open homosexuality in the military, reached critical mass when desperate Democrats, knowing their agenda would fail in the new year under a GOP leadership in the House, forced through Congress a plan to authorize such sexual behaviors in the military.

While the formal change still awaits several conditions, including verification from the military that there will be no significant "impacts," it was WND that reported how veterans protested and one officer immediately announced he would rather be relieved of his command than order his troops to go through pro-homosexual indoctrination.

WND also had the report when experts warned the move to open homosexuality in the military was being rushed and when it was revealed that the military's own survey – used to support the change – probably was manipulated or worse.





10. The impact of the TSA's new full-body scanners, including the associated health risks, invasion of privacy issues and violations of the 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable searches.

Late in 2010, the federal government in the name of air travel security rolled out new demands for passengers at airport screening stations to undergo either an X-ray that produces an essentially nude image or a full-body pat-down that includes touching private parts.

The backlash was strong among civil rights advocates and the videos and images of offensive pat-downs and invasive images were viral on the Internet.

However, it was left largely to WND for reporting that found an analysis concluding the searches probably violate the Constitution.

In addition, WND reported how the Transportation Security Administration's newest technology can be fooled into missing bombs that are taped onto a person as well as the likelihood that cancer would result from repeated X-ray radiation.

Further, experts documented for WND how loathsome diseases easily could – and probably would – be spread from one passenger to another through the gloves agents use to touch passengers, but don't change.

Finally, came the alarming warning that a TSA official's recommendation that invasive pat-downs of young children be treated as a game brought the warning that such actions would only groom them for possible attacks from pedophiles.


Honorable mention: The pink slips.

Earning honorable mention were the "pink slip" campaigns that were organized by WND Founder and CEO Joseph Farah, on issues including America's opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens, the nation's abhorrence at machines that produce nude body images or invasive pat-downs at airport security checkpoints, concerns Americans have over Obama's nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, and others.

They all were based on the success of a campaign that dispatched nearly 10 million warnings to members of Congress to return to the values of their constituents or face being removed from office in November.

The GOP landslide in the November election followed those warnings.


Read more at www.wnd.com
 

Islamic terror? This is worse

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

Islamic terror? This is worse

Attackers warn they will strike 'again and again'

FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN

© 2011 WorldNetDaily

A new threat is emerging – or re-emerging – that moves terror beyond even what has been created by blood-thirsty radical Islamists who want a worldwide caliphate under control of the Shariah and the Quran, says a report from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.

The new multi-national threat comes from those who want a stateless society – no government, no rules, no police, no authority – and have emerged partly along with Europe's growing financial crisis.

They are anarchists.


Often tied to leftist organizations as well as more traditional terrorist groups such as the Red Army Faction, they stunned the world four decades ago when known as the Baader-Meinhof Group with their allegiance to violence for the sake of violence alone.

Security experts note they've been around ever since: clogging streets outside meetings of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank and the G-20. They march, destroy storefronts and vehicles, then confront police and lose the battle.

But now analysts confirm they've seen an increase in the intensity and violence in the anarchists' arsenal of weapons.

Just in recent days they planted an explosive device on a motorcycle, blowing up and damaging portions of a courthouse in Athens. No one was injured. Shortly before that, letter bombs sent over the Christmas holidays to several embassies in Rome did explode, causing casualties.

"We're striking again, and we do so in response to the appeal launched by our Greek companions," according to the Italian group known as the Informal Anarchist Association.

Antonio Marini, chief prosecutor in Rome investigating anarchism in Italy, has raised the prospect that anarchist groups in other European countries could increase the level of violence or merge with other, more aggressive entities.

In addition to Italy, anarchist groups have been set up in France, Germany, Greece, Spain, Austria, Holland, Switzerland, Sweden, Portugal, and in the Eastern European countries such as Bulgaria, Belarus, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Ukraine and even Russia.

As these groups spread, there are signs that they are coordinating their activities, such as the French Alternative Libertaire, the Swiss Organisation Socialiste Libertaire which is politically close to the French AL, and the Italian Federation of Anarchist Communists, or FdCA.


According to the European Union's Europol, attacks by anarchist militant groups increased by 43 percent in 2009, a level which more than doubled from 2007.

"We will organize internationally and take aim at the enemy," one anarchist group's statement recently said. "We can't wait to see the subversive elements flooding the streets and the guerrilla groups striking again and again."


Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND.

Read more at www.wnd.com
 

UP scientists blast raid on Bt eggplant test site

Amplify’d from www.philstar.com
UP scientists blast raid on Bt eggplant test site
The Philippine Star

MANILA, Philippines - The forcible uprooting of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) eggplant planted at the UP Mindanao campus has earned the ire of academics and scientists who were appalled at what they describe as an “invasion,” saying it amounts to an “assault on the quest for truth.”


The raiders justified their action on the ground that there was no consultation with the local government when the test sites were planned and experiments set up in the UP Min’s Bago Oshiro campus.


UP scientists noted that Mayor Sara Duterte may have been misled into allowing the raid, “which was carried out to the complete surprise of biotechnology advocates who were working on environmental safety and risks assessments associated with cultivation of Bt eggplant.”


Dr. Candida B. Adalla, chief of the Biotechnology Program Office (BPO), said she was dumbfounded when she learned about the raid, which was pushed by Greenpeace and other purported environmental groups opposed to any form of test on Bt eggplant, also known as Bt brinjal in India.


Adalla said six Indian scientific institutions have affirmed the safety of Bt eggplant and dismissed allegations that it is a “monster crop.”


Dr. Eufemio Rasco of UP Mindanao, an academician at the National Academy of Science and Technology (NAST), had been engaged in a bitter debate with rabid opponents of Bt eggplant, which is now on field trial in seven sites nationwide.


He had supported the tests and said those who oppose it should remember that Bt is the same organic bacterium used in their Bt sprays commonly used in Mindanao and is also the same bacterium that is present in the soil.


Bt has been used to fortify the local eggplant variety to allow it to manufacture a protein that can protect the eggplant fruit by killing the dreaded fruits and stem borer that feeds on the country’s most popular vegetable

.

In spite of the fact that the insecticidal properties of Bt had been known since 1901 and it had been used in a number of products spanning several decades, Greenpeace and other still would not want any developing country to avail itself of the benefits from the bacterium, which inhabits the soil and is not pathogenic.


Adalla stressed that the field tests of Bt eggplant have been approved by the Bureau of Plant Industry (BPI) and subjected to rigorous assessments by the appropriate regulatory bodies and independent scientists before the tests were carried out.


As such, she argued, the test is legitimate, consistent and compliant with government-issued set of guidelines which is considered “one of the strictest in the world” and is being used as reference by nearby Asian countries as they develop their own policy for GM testing.


She expressed regret that “UP’s academic freedom to do independent research was assaulted/violated, a tradition that UP holds so dearly. The uprooting of a scientific experiment is an assault to scientific inquiry and independence of responsible scientists in quest for truth. This is the first time it happened to the university, touted as the bastion of scientific research and technological innovations.


Sometime ago, Rasco (also a UP professor and scientist) had been criticized by the rabid opponents of Bt eggplant and any other genetically modified organism (GMO) but stood his ground and secured the support of UP students who had lauded his principled stand.


“Why are they so afraid of these tests? Even the Vatican itself had expressed support for research into biotechnological options to improve the quality of crops, raise the food inventory and assure farmers of better incomes. It seems they do not want facts. They only want superstition to rule the food chain. Are we back to the Dark Ages?” he asked.


Since Bt was first used in 1901, there has never been a single case in which the friendly bacterium contaminated anything nor did it cause any disease.


In fact, organic farmers use Bt for their sprays but Greenpeace and other groups did not raise any howl, biotechnologists complained.


Going by their meterstick, the environmentalists want no intervention on plant genetics, Rasco said, but they should also train their guns on Fr. Gregor Mendel, the geneticist who opened the door to durable crops that they eat today.


He expressed fears that if these environmental groups can resort to the rule of the mob without being sanctioned, “then there would be no hope for science in agriculture and we might as well return to the rule of the jungle.”

Read more at www.philstar.com
 

The Pope, Interreligious Leader

Amplify’d from www.americamagazine.org

Cambridge, MA. Austen Ivereigh’s most recent blog very helpfully draws our attention to the Pope’s New Year’s Day - World Day of Peace – message, Religious Freedom, the Path to Peace, just as he did a week ago to the Pope’s BBC broadcast and its welcome message.

Given the religious violence that is in the news these days, it is timely that the Pope is speaking out and challenging his peers in other traditions to work together for respect and human rights. And it is good that the Pope uses these public occasions to make broad, general appeals that we live together in peace, and work with our sisters and brothers in other religious traditions to ensure freedom of religion and make religious commitment a source of respect for all people. (In this regard, it is striking that he plans now to honor John Paul II’s bold initiative in gathering religious leaders for prayer in Assisi in 1986, by an anniversary event there this fall.

As readers know, I enjoy teasing out themes of interreligious significance from this Pope’s writings and pronouncements, as I did recently with respect to his book-length interview, The Light of the World.

But in this case, it is easy, and a pleasure, to add this blog in support of Mr. Ivereigh’s, since the Pope's Religious Freedom, the Path to Peace, is rich in statements about the mutual cooperation and mutual respect required today, not just of individual believers, but of religious communities — in all faiths, large and small. See the quotes I highlight at the end of this blog — and of course, go and read the Pope’s entire message.

I close my part of this reflection with just a few further observations. First, again, it really is true that this Pope is now taking the lead in pushing the Church to take religious diversity seriously as a positive reality. Second, it is important to notice that he is not speaking simply of individuals with good faith and sincerity, but of entire traditions, with their own leadership structures, as counterparts to the Church. Nor does  there seem to be any thought in the Pope’s remarks of “the Church plus the great religions” — rather, the Church is one among these religions today, however we understand that fact.

But three harder points also need to be made. First, it is not so easy to mark off the “great religions” as our counterparts. It would not be easy, nor useful, to decide which traditions are great or little, so the door is open to taking seriously many small and more local traditions that don’t fit neatly onto the Judaism-Christianity-Islam-Hinduism-Buddhism-Confucianism-Taoism-Shintoism list. It would be very far from the logic of the Pope’s appeal to ignore small traditions, even if he does not refer to them. Nor, of course, do religions’ most prominent and powerful clerics necessarily speak adequately for their communities, so the conversation on religious liberty envisioned by the Pope cannot be merely a top-down enterprise.

Second, the quotes I selected below from paragraph 11 appeal to Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate (and not, for instance, Dominus Iesus) to ground a Catholic openness to other faiths. This is fine, but there is work to be done in dealing with the widespread opinion among people of other faith traditions, after 45 years, that Nostra Aetate offers only a good start, a cautious, limited, partial, even condescending respect for the world’s religions. The Pope and the Vatican very much need to work with theologians and those with long experience in actual interreligious dialogue to bolster with credibility the appeal made in Religious Freedom, the Path to Peace and the new Assis gesture. Unless it is clear that to its deepest core the Church is thoroughly serious about working with people of other traditions and in not predetermining the conversation, it seems unlikely that real cooperation will take place.

Third, it is rather early to ponder the issue, but what kind of spiritual exchange will take place at the proposed Assisi 2011 meeting? It is well known that many, including Joseph Ratzinger, hesitated at the idea that religious leaders could or should pray together at Assisi in 1986. But it seems necessary today that we ambition more: if we do not pray together, can we really work together as religious persons? Speeches and declarations and photo ops will not suffice; dare I say that God will not be satisfied with leaders who insist on praying only separately from one another? In his last book, Christianity and the Religions, Jacques Dupuis, SJ, reflected on Assisi 1986 and discussed the ways in which we can think about praying together with people of other faith traditions. I hope there is still a copy of this good book at the Vatican, since it will be a good reference in the months to come.

Selections from what the Pope said in his New Year's Day address:

7. "How can anyone deny the contribution of the world’s great religions to the development of civilization? The sincere search for God has led to greater respect for human dignity. Christian communities, with their patrimony of values and principles, have contributed much to making individuals and peoples aware of their identity and their dignity, the establishment of democratic institutions and the recognition of human rights and their corresponding duties.

10. "In a globalized world marked by increasingly multi-ethnic and multi-religious societies, the great religions can serve as an important factor of unity and peace for the human family. On the basis of their religious convictions and their reasoned pursuit of the common good, their followers are called to give responsible expression to their commitment within a context of religious freedom. Amid the variety of religious cultures, there is a need to value those elements which foster civil coexistence, while rejecting whatever is contrary to the dignity of men and women.

"The public space which the international community makes available for the religions and their proposal of what constitutes a “good life” helps to create a measure of agreement about truth and goodness, and a moral consensus; both of these are fundamental to a just and peaceful coexistence. The leaders of the great religions, thanks to their position, their influence and their authority in their respective communities, are the first ones called to mutual respect and dialogue.

11. "For the Church, dialogue between the followers of the different religions represents an important means of cooperating with all religious communities for the common good. The Church herself rejects nothing of what is true and holy in the various religions. “She has a high regard for those ways of life and conduct, precepts and doctrines which, although differing in many ways from her own teaching, nevertheless often reflect a ray of that truth which enlightens all men and women.”

"The path to take is not the way of relativism or religious syncretism. The Church, in fact, “proclaims, and is in duty bound to proclaim without fail, Christ who is the way, the truth and the life (Jn 14:6); in Christ, in whom God reconciled all things to himself, people find the fullness of the religious life”. Yet this in no way excludes dialogue and the common pursuit of truth in different areas of life, since, as Saint Thomas Aquinas would say, “every truth, whoever utters it, comes from the Holy Spirit.”

"The year 2011 marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of the World Day of Prayer for Peace convened in Assisi in 1986 by Pople John Paul II. On that occasion the leaders of the great world religions testified to the fact that religion is a factor of union and peace, and not of division and conflict. The memory of that experience gives reason to hope for a future in which all believers will see themselves, and will actually be, agents of justice and peace.

12. "Politics and diplomacy should look to the moral and spiritual patrimony offered by the great religions of the world in order to acknowledge and affirm universal truths, principles and values which cannot be denied without denying the dignity of the human person."

Read more at www.americamagazine.org
 

British Bishop Links Traditional Catholicism to Pedophilia

Amplify’d from www.examiner.com

British Bishop Links Traditional Catholicism to Pedophilia


Getty

Photo: Is this man "extreme" and "flamboyant" in vestments and rubrics as Bp. Burns says?

Much akin to likening laws against robbing banks as the main cause of bank robberies, Bishop Tom Burns of the Diocese of Menevia, Wales, has stated from the pulpit that the homosexual rape of pre-pubescent boys by a very small percentage of Catholic priests was caused by the following liturgical attitude;

"Those who go to extremes to express the Mass in a particular way..."  by way of "Flamboyant modes of liturgical vestments and rubrical gestures."


And according to the cleric still in good standing within the Catholic Church, the reason for "extremes" and "flamboyant modes" happens to be Clericalism (the anti-priest notion that from an eccesiastical perspective, priests wield too much power);

For priests who offended [committed pedophilia], I’m not sure that their abuses grew out of the rule of celibacy; abuse happens within otherwise good families too. I’m more convinced that it grew out of the clericalism of the past. That clericalism risks raising its head today among those who again are looking for identity in status, not service. They want to be treated differently.


The Bishop's argument that Clericalism is the root cause for pedophilia fails to hold water in light of Newsweek magazine's report in April, 2010 that;

"The rate of abuse by Catholic priests is not higher than these national estimates [for the average male]."


It defies common sense that Clericalism fuels pedophilia simply because there aren't any clerics in Corporate America, family owned businesses or any other segment of American life other than that of Tradition-minded Catholics.

Bishop Burns also fails to mention that in a John Jay School of Law study commissioned by the USCCB, it was determined that more than eighty percent of the abuse at issue was of a homosexual nature.

The same John Jay study cites that the number of reported victims of male-on-male sexual abuse are as follows;

  • 353 in the 1950s. 
  • 1,264 in the 1960s.
  • 2,129 in the 1970s.

The number of priests in the 1950s was greater than it was in the 1970s, yet the number of homosexual rape skyrocketed as the number of Traditional-minded priests passed away and the number of theologically liberal-minded slowly took over the ranks of the priesthood.

And The Catalyst For The Collapse...

In a previously published Examiner article, it's been cited that just about everything Catholic, from the number of priests to the number of Faithful that attend Mass, has been swirling the drain ever since the so-called fresh breeze of Vatican II hit the shores of the United States like a Cat-5 hurricane.

Prior to the 1970s, the vast majority of those in the English-speaking world never even heard the word 'pedophilia', more or less even understood the meaning.

And not since the ultra-liberal takeover of Catholicism since the closing of the Second Vatican Council and the corresponding takeover of the seminaries by the Lavender Mafia, has there been not only a rise in homosexual misconduct and crimes, but an overall abandonment of Catholicism by a majority of the Faithful.  

What Progressive Catholics Really Want...

Bishop Burns seems to have forgotten that ordained priests are of a higher ecclesiastical state than those of the laity, no matter how badly Roman Protestants desire for the laity to be equal to (or greater than) that of priests.

The so-called Progressive Catholics have enamored themselves to anti-clericalism to such a point that they would delight in seeing priests essentially become nothing more than Eucharistic sperm donors, flitting from parish to parish, consecrating hosts and hearing the rare Confession of the relative handful of mainstream post-Vatican II Catholics who still retain the vague recollection that Penance is still a Sacrament.

Regardless if His Excellency Bishop Burns wants to admit it or not, the cause of pedophilia isn't the acceptance of Clericalism... it's the acceptance of homosexuality.

Source - The Telegraph

If you like this article, please click on the SUBSCRIBE button above (it's free) to receive e-mail alerts when a new article is published by this Examiner, or click here to add Kevin's News Portal Page to your favorites.

Read more at www.examiner.com
 

Readers respond to ’The Catholic Who’s Anti-Catholic’

One person even wrote, "Nuke the Vatican ASAP.”

Amplify’d from www.pewsitter.com

Readers respond to ’The Catholic Who’s Anti-Catholic’


By Matt Abbott

Pewsitter.com


January 1, 2011 - As expected, I’ve received both angry and complimentary e-mails in response to my previous PewSitter.com commentary. One person even wrote, &idquo;Nuke the Vatican ASAP.” Nice, huh? Please be advised that I will not correspond with anyone who writes such things, although I will save your e-mails just in case I, um, happen to meet with foul play and the authorities need to know where to begin their investigation. Anyway, below are selected (edited) e-mails. Happy New Year!



Carolyn Van Pelt wrote:






I’m not anyone of any consequence whose opinion would matter, but I frequently read your column and appreciated ’The Catholic who’s anti-Catholic.’ I was gone from the Church for 20 years. Left after a major conversion in my 20’s and because a good friend, who ’corrected’ everything I’d been taught in eight years of Catholic school, told me I needed to be ’born again.’ I wandered from one Protestant church to another like a homeless orphan until five years ago, when through the faithful prayers and rosaries of my mother, I came home to the one, true Church.



However, while I was gone, I met so many Catholics who also had left and harbored great hatred for the Church—and I do mean hatred. Sadly, because of years of my association with Evangelical fundamentalists, I became one of them. I’m still healing. It’s been a whirlwind journey. It hurts to read it, but it’s true. The bigotry is real, and I was one of them.



Now, after several great confessors and a wonderful priest who told me to get up
from the ashes, use what I’ve learned and bring those who have wandered from The Faith, home, I’ve humbly embarked on that mission, stumbling with a new blog of my own, praying that for every soul I embittered, the Lord will let me bring 10 back. I learn a great deal from you and appreciate your witness for the truth.





A.F. wrote:






Oh please Matt, I think this woman is quite centered and knows what she is talking about, because being a survivor, I have experienced the scorching indifference of the Church. No one knows in my old parish community nor do they care of what happened when I approached the Church and parish. This woman is so right about the Church blathering on about abortion and homosexuality, as though they have the right moral compass.



Your words above prove to me that you are a Catholic droid. Get educated. If you tell a woman not to get an abortion, you’d better be ready and willing to support her and her baby personally until the baby is grown. Otherwise you must not preach. I’ll never read another article by you.





Tony Loginow wrote:






Thank you once again for a poignant article about Catholics who are looking for a way out of their own turned and misdirected hearts, minds and consciences. Your articles fill an important link for those Catholics who follow the Magisterium. Happy New Year and the God bless you and your family in 2011.





Diego J. Pena wrote:






Your column was well-written, direct and to the point. I completely agree with you. While I, like other Catholics, am disappointed over the scandals, I see the scandals as an opportunity for the Church to become stronger. Sadly, the lady you quoted is very misguided. We need to pray for these fallen-away Catholics. Keep up the good work.





Helen Westover wrote:






Oh As you know, I am not anti-Catholic. But the damage done to my beloved Church by these crimes is incalculable. I was a victim of clergy abuse, from adolescence to adulthood. At my ’Cursillo,’ during a ’spiritual guidance’ encounter, the priest ran his hand up my leg.



I love the Church with all my heart, and thank God, I didn’t let these experiences (three priests and a bishop) damage my faith. But we must hold Christ’s one, true Church to a higher standard. I know it’s difficult sometimes to decipher who is using this as a sledgehammer to further damage the Church and those who have been truly wounded.





Cecilia Skudder wrote:






I have to tell you how delighted I am by your commentary on Pewsitter regarding that lady who was so vitriolic in her condemnation of the Catholic Church. As a wife, mother, grandmother, retired Macmillan Nurse (who looked after those dying of cancer), volunteer editor of my parish’s website and numerous other roles, I am so pleased you put into words what I find hard to do.



I live in Orpington, Kent, UK. It was an Australian from Mackay who alerted me to Pewsitter and I have put a link to it on my parish’s website. Thanks again for your support of the Church.








Matt C. Abbott is a Catholic columnist with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Communication, Media and Theatre from Northeastern Illinois University in Chicago, and an Associate in Applied Science degree in Business Management from Triton College in River Grove, Ill. He has worked in the right-to-life movement and is a published writer focused on Catholic and social issues. He can be reached at mattcabbott@gmail.com.
Read more at www.pewsitter.com
 

The first Anglicans have received into the Roman Catholic Church under a scheme set up by Pope Benedict XVI

Amplify’d from www.telegraph.co.uk

First Anglicans are received into the Roman Catholic Church in historic service


The first Anglicans have received into the Roman Catholic Church under a
scheme set up by Pope Benedict XVI.

The first Anglicans have received into the Roman Catholic Church under a scheme set up by Pope Benedict XVI.
Pope Benedict XVI leads the New Year solemn mass in Saint Peter's Basilica at the Vatican


Priests and worshippers from around 20 Church of England parishes converted to
Catholicism on Saturday at a ceremony in Westminster Cathedral.



Three former bishops were among those confirmed at the service, which saw the
first wave of Anglicans defecting to Rome to join the Ordinariate.



The Pope introduced the structure in 2009 to welcome disillusioned Anglicans
into the Catholic fold after secret meetings were held at the Vatican with
Church of England bishops, as The Sunday Telegraph revealed a year earlier.



The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, admitted the move had put him
in “an awkward position”, but more recently he said he respected the
decisions of those who decided to leave.



While around 50 clergy are expected to defect to the Catholic Church over the
coming months, it has been predicted that thousands of traditionalist
worshippers will join the exodus, particularly if they are given no
concessions once women are made bishops.


Opposition to women bishops was one of the main reasons for the priests’
resignations from the Church of England, said Bishop Alan Hopes, the
Catholic bishop who has overseen their welcome into the Ordinariate.


More importantly, he added, “most of them have been journeying, seeking the
fullness of truth, and they found it in the Catholic Church”.


The former bishops of Fulham, Ebbsfleet and Richborough, John Broadhurst,
Andrew Burnham and Keith Newton respectively, were applauded after they
received holy communion before a packed congregation at the cathedral
yesterday.


They have been key to orchestrating the exodus from the Church of England and
advocating the Ordinariate, which they described as an “answer to their
prayers”.


Fr Broadhurst has been particularly vocal in criticising the Church, accusing
it of breaking promises to opponents of women bishops and describing it as
“vicious” and “fascist”.


Two of the bishops’ wives were also confirmed as Catholics yesterday, along
with three former Anglican nuns who were forced to take refuge in a Catholic
convent after being told to leave their house at Walsingham Abbey.


Their departure devastated the community in Walsingham, leaving four older
nuns to run the priory while the younger ones faced a period of uncertainty.


One of the nuns, Sister Wendy Renata, said she felt “fantastic” after formally
being welcomed into the Catholic Church.


“I’ve wanted to do it for years. I’ve finally done it,” she said.


In the next few weeks, the next groups of clergy and worshippers are set to be
received into the Catholic Church, which is due to announce the precise
timetable for the launch of the Ordinariate this month.


The confirmations at yesterday’s service were the first step to its
establishment in this country. All of the clergy who have resigned from the
Church of England now have to be re-ordained as the Catholic Church does not
recognise Anglican orders.


It is expected that as many as 50 clergy will be ordained by Easter as the new
structure begins to take shape, but there are likely to be many disputes in
parishes torn over whether to remain in the Church of England.


The Most Rev Vincent Nichols, the Archbishop of Westminster, said in November
that he did not feel “guilty” that some Anglican parishes would be left
without vicars.


He said the Catholic Church would provide £250,000 in start-up funding for the
Ordinariate and look to raise more money from donations and sponsors to
cover running costs.


Archbishop Williams has expressed regret at the resignations of the clergy and
warned that there will be challenges as they set up their new churches.


“I think the challenge will come in working out shared use of churches, of how
we as Anglicans 'recommend’ people and also of course there will be some
parishes without priests - so we have a practical challenge here and there,”
he said.


Earlier in the process, the Vatican published its “apostolic constitution
Anglicanorum coetibus”, allowing Anglican clergy to enter into full
communion with the Catholic Church while maintaining aspects of their
spiritual heritage.


While Catholic priests are not permitted to marry, there are a small number of
former Anglican bishops with wives, who joined the Catholic clergy post the
mid-90s.


“They were given disciplinary sanction from clerical celibacy in order to be
ordained as a Catholic priest,” Bishop Hopes said.


Commenting on how the Anglican Archbishop might feel about the arrangement,
Bishop Hopes said he understood he would be feeling unhappy.


“But I know too that he understands that we are all on a journey of faith, and
sometimes our paths take standard routes.


“And if you truly believe that you have found fullness of truth in the
Catholic Church, there is nothing you can do about it.


“You have to become a Catholic.”


A former Anglican convert himself, Bishop Hopes was received into the Catholic
Church in 1994.

Read more at www.telegraph.co.uk
 

Idolatry: Pope John Paul II statue lands in Mumbai - The Times of India

MUMBAI: A statue of the late Pope John Paul II will be installed in the compound of Holy Name Cathedral, next to the Catholic archbishop's house, at Colaba in February.



The statue, which has been sent by the Vatican, is part of a larger plan to have similar installations across the world even as the late pope is about to be canonized. A church source said the 400-kg statue had already arrived in the city but it was awaiting clearance from the Customs authorities. The statue will be installed next to the bell in the cathedral compound.



Another statue is supposed to be installed in a Catholic institution in Delhi.



Known for his leading role in known to be one of the most influential persons in the world and bringing down the Communist regime in Poland, the late pope was born Karol Jozef Wojtyla on May 18, 1920 in Poland. He became the pope in October 1978 and his tenure lasted till April, 2005. during which, the world witnessed the roll back of Communism from most of eastern Europe. Incidentally, he has been the only Polish and non-Italian pope since 1552. He passed Karol Jozef Wojtyla who later took on the name John Paul II after he become pope away on April 2, 2005.



Pope John Paul II was pope from October 1978 to April 2005 during which time he saw the roll back of communism from most of Eastern Europe. He was the only Polish Pope and was the only non Italian Pope since 1552.

The much travelled pope visited 129 countries in the world and opened the doors of the catholic church for a dialogue with the protestant churches, judaism, islam and the eastern rite churches.he however generated a controversy when he took orthodox stands on contraception and the ordination of women in the catholic church.





Church sources said that the statue of the pope will be installed next to the bell in the cathedral compound to mark the visit of pope paul vi to the city in the mid 1960's. john paul ii visited india twice during his tenure as pope, once in 1986 and again in 1992 and came out strongly against the trend among radical priests who were part of the liberation theology movement.this movement advocated the use of marxist methods for protecting the rights of the poor and the downtrodden.





Read more: Pope John Paul II statue lands in Mumbai - The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Pope-John-Paul-II-statue-lands-in-Mumbai/articleshow/7202728.cms#ixzz19rqG8vC8