ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Casting a Wide Net

Casting a Wide Net

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the January 2011 issue of Scientific American

The English language offers some entertaining euphemisms, and one I’ve always found amusing is used by parents like me, who will say they need to talk to the kids about the “birds and the bees.” Science, as usual, adds a new perspective: fishes were around a long time before the birds and bees got busy. Now recently discovered fossils show that internal fertilization arrived millions of years before previously thought and in a more primitive species of fish than expected.

In what is today an Australian cattle ranch, biologist John A. Long and his team examined fossils of sea creatures from the Devonian era. They discovered the earliest evidence of an animal that had sex and gave birth the way we do: a 375-million-year-old embryo inside an ancient fish called Materpiscis. The fossils give us new clues about how our own reproductive system arose and how different parts of anatomy evolved over time. As Long writes in his feature article and this issue’s cover story, “Dawn of the Deed”: “Sex, it seems, really did change everything.” That’s no fish tale.

Long and his colleagues had to go to Australia to make their finds, but the Internet lets us share the joy of science discovery and learning globally. A new program that provides this capability is the Google Online Science Fair, which will be formally announced in mid-January. The fair will accept submissions from students around the world in three age categories, covering kids from middle through high school. I will be among the judges of the fair projects and will travel to the event to meet the winners in July 2011. Scientific American is partnering on the project as part of our ongoing educational efforts.

Perhaps you will view the information about the online science fair by using your smart phone or an electronic tablet. And if you do, you might also look for Scientific American on the iPhone, iPad and other devices soon. The magazine and its editors are also on Facebook and Twitter. In addition, we’re taking science to the people in person. In the past few months we have held Scientific American events at the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco, at the 92nd Street Y TriBeCa in New York City—and most recently at the New York Academy of Sciences.

The heart of what we do at Scientific American will always be the expert-informed, authoritative editorial that we provide, and we hope that exploring these new venues and formats will help bring science to the lay public more broadly. The world at large could certainly use more science.

Read more at www.scientificamerican.com
 

Dawn of the Deed: the Origin of Sex [Video]

Dawn of the Deed: the Origin of Sex [Video]

Evidence of reproduction by internal fertilization has been discovered in a large group of ancient jawed fish. Embryos discovered within fossils of these animals confirm that live birth in prehistoric times was much more widespread than previously thought. Watch the researchers talk about the fossils and techniques used to find them.

Scientists used to think that, among backboned animals, internal fertilization and carrying the young inside the mother's body originated in sharks and their kin some 350 million years ago. Before then, sexual reproduction in fish consisted of spawning, wherein females deposit eggs in the water, the males fertilize them, and the embryos then develop out in the open. Or so the story went.



As the cover story of the January 2011 Scientific American explains, recent analyses of fossils found in a remote locale in northwestern Australia and elsewhere have shown that intercourse and live birth actually arose millions of years earlier than previously believed—and in a more primitive group of fish than the one to which sharks belong. These fish—called placoderms—reside on the long line of animals leading us, and their sexual equipment gave rise to our own reproductive system and other parts of our anatomy.



In this video paleontologist John A. Long of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, author of the cover story, discusses a fossil central to this new view of the origin of copulation and live birth: a 375-million-year-old expectant mother fish dubbed Materpiscis attenboroughi.
See more at www.scientificamerican.com
 

Pimp My Virus: Ocean Edition

Pimp My Virus: Ocean Edition

Image: The starfish-shaped EZ-open structure of mimivirus, above, and the gray DNA-containing nucleocapsid inside, below. The nucleocapsid has plenty of room to breathe and a concave depression, not unlike the dimple on the Death Star, that always faces the "starfish". From PLoS Biology.

In 1992, scientists sampled the water from a cooling tower in Bradford, England, where an outbreak of pneumonia had just occurred. They were looking for respiratory disease-causing bacteria of the sort that cause Legionnaires' Disease, and they found several, including a new one they named Bradfordcoccus. Except Bradfordcoccus was not a bacterium. Bradfordcoccus, once outed more than 10 years later, would become on its discovery the world's largest known virus, an entire order of magnitude larger than any known before.

And what a virus it is. Its genome is over 1.1 million base pairs long, which is bigger than that of about two dozen cellular clades, and it codes for over 900 genes, which includes most of the proteins the virus needs to survive. That also means that, according to some scientists, it may be the descendant of some of the earliest life on earth – or sort-of life, anyway.

Its overall shape is one of the few standard things about it: a familiar viral icosahedron – which was the way it was finally identified – encased in a shaggy coat of fibers, which some other viruses do have.But unlike economy viruses whose contents are packed in about as tightly as they can go, the roomy interior houses ample space for a membrane-bound bag containing the organism's DNA (the nucleocapsid). And it possesses an unique starfish-shaped seal on one of its icosahedral vertices, likely the viral equivalent of the pop top.

They are as big as common bacteria like Rickettsia (one species of which causes Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever), and bigger than Mycoplasma genitalium, the smallest-known free living bacterium (whose own genome is only half as long as mimivirus's at about 600kb) an organism scientists recently synthesized in the lab in their pursuit of synthetic life. You could almost see one of these things under a light microscope – they're about 750 nm wide when you include their furry coat. When I took microbiology in college, I could easily see bacteria 1-2 micrometers big under oil-immersion light microscopy.

Image: Mimivirus. Credit: Creative Commons Xanthine

As may be imagined, these viruses are mind-benders for your basic definition of "What Is Alive", to which viruses have traditionally been considered "Most Definitely Not". Though they reproduce, viruses cannot do so without their host cells. And most known viruses are tremendously smaller than their host and depend on them for nearly all of the machinery they need to reproduce. The DNA of giant viruses contain instructions for many of the genes needed to make DNA, RNA, proteins, and sugars that are typically only found in living cells – just about everything they need to reproduce.

French scientists dubbed the entity "mimivirus", for "mimicking microbe". Others called them "giant viruses." And now that scientists have started looking for them, they are finding them all over the planet. It turns out the ocean is full of them.

In October, scientists announced the discovery of a mimi-like virus pulled out of the waters off Texas (you know what they say: "Everything's Bigger in the Waters Off Texas") parasitizing not freshwater amoebae, but an oceanic predatory protist. This particular new virus (delightfully) attacks a marine microbe called Cafeteria roenbergensis (Proposed new viral targets: Coffeeshopia starbucksii and Buffet allyoucaneatensis) that is a major player in marine food webs, ocean carbon cycling, and the works. The big implication, of course, is that since Cafeteria roenbergensis is, as may be inferred from its name, a robust planktonic predator which may even be the most numerically abundant predator on the planet (PDF), a virus that affects its population dynamics could have a big influence on the whole ocean system. And we didn't even know it was there.

Image: Cafeteria roenbergensis: Credit: Creative Commons Dennis Barthel/zapyon.

Though the C. roenbergensis virus (which researchers have dubbed CroV) is clearly related to the Acanthamoeba mimivirus (it's in the nucleocytoplasmic large DNA virus (NCLDV) group, whose other celebrities include the pox viruses and phycodnaviruses of algae), this new virus is substantially different. Less than one-third of its genes clearly share an evolutionary origin with mimivirus genes.

With a genome of 730,000 bp, CroV is the largest known marine virus (probably because it's the only known marine giant virus). Unlike some of the smallest viruses, which get by on ten or so genes sometimes written over each other on the opposite sides of the same piece of genetic material*, CroV is bursting with goodies, including 544 predicted genes, of which 22 code for transfer RNAs. Transfer RNA (tRNA) shuttles amino acids to messenger RNA – the code for making proteins – in ribosomes during protein synthesis. Considering there are only about 20-22 amino acids needed to make proteins by most organisms, it could theoretically make them all (on the other hand, humans have genes for several hundred kinds of tRNAs. Efficiency, as it has been well documented, is not our genome's strong suit).

Also unlike many smaller viruses, who actually exploit their genetic sloppiness for evolutionary advantage, CroV, like most cellular organisms, cares about and takes care of its DNA. It encodes its own DNA repair enzymes, among which are two photolyases, which repair damage to DNA from ultraviolet light. There's also a 38-kilobase region that seems to have come from bacteria, and includes an entire pathway for making a key component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. What's that doing there? It gets weirder: Acanthamoeba mimivirus even contains eukaryotic genes, that is, genes from multicellular or more complex organisms with nuclei like protists. Likely, the viruses picked up their genetic bounty by accident when self-assembling inside a cell and the remains of one of their host's latest meals or other parasites happened to float by, a process scientists like to call considerably less excitingly "horizontal gene transfer".

Why are these viruses so big? Mimivirus's large size, it turns out, may be its way of saying "Eat Me" to amoebae. Experiments with precisely sized plastic beads have shown that if mimivirus were any smaller, the amoeba could not engulf them as quickly or effeciently. That may also be true of the predatory Cafeteria. And it may be that by being big, that allowed their genomes to expand further. Of course, being big comes with some costs, too. A mimivirus relative that proved to be even bigger – the "mamavirus", discovered in a water cooling tower in Paris -- is the first known virus to have attracted its own parasite: Sputnik virus. Other viruses have been known to have "satellite viruses" that cannot replicate except in their presence. But they incur no fitness cost to their "host" virus. Sputnik (literally, "satellite" in Russian), on the other hand, actively taxes the mamavirus's ability to replicate, causing it to churn out deformed virions with abnormal capsids, or shells. That is a first. When, as a virus, you have spawned your own viral parasite, you know you have made it, er, big.

For me, the magic of this finding is that we were literally surrounded by these things, and no one knew they were there. Undoubtedly, scientists say, CroV is but the tip of the iceberg for giant viruses in the ocean. Here is the forehead-smacking realization: filters we were using to sift "bacteria"-sized particles from our "viral" samples caught these viruses too, of course. When researchers sampled the "bacterial" fraction of seawater filtrates for NCLDV DNA, 86% tested positive for mimivirus. Untold weirdness awaits.

*That is, reading the same piece of DNA or RNA one way you get one protein, and reading part of the same exact piece in the opposite direction yields another. Crazy, but I seem to recall this is true from college virology but can't find confirmation online. Readers?

References:

Online:

A Giant Among Giants. Small Things Considered, July 26, 2010. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

A virus's virus. The Scientist, Aug. 6, 2008. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

Mimivirus: Discovery of a Giant Virus. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

Unintelligent Design. Discover Magazine, March 15, 2006. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

'Virophage' suggests viruses are alive. Nature 454, 677 (7 August 2008) | :10.1038/454677a; Published online 6 August 2008

Viral Missing Link Caught on Film. Wired Science, May 5, 2009. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

World's Largest, Most Complex Marine Virus Is Major Player in Ocean Ecosystems Science Daily, Oct. 31, 2010. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

Journal:

Baldauf, S.L. (2008)."An overview of the phylogeny and diversity of eukaryotes". Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46 (3): 263–273. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1002.2008.08060 .

Fischer, M. G.; Allen, M. J.; Wilson, W. H.; Suttle, C. A. (2010). "Giant virus with a remarkable complement of genes infects marine zooplankton". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1073/pnas.1007615107

Matthias G. Fischer, Michael J. Allen, William H. Wilson, Curtis A. Suttle. Giant virus with a remarkable complement of genes infects marine zooplankton. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007615107

Xiao C, Kuznetsov YG, Sun S, Hafenstein SL, Kostyuchenko VA, et al. (2009) 1000092Structural Studies of the Giant Mimivirus. PLoS Biol 7(4): e1000092. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.

For Further Info:

Cafeteria roenbergensis. Wikipedia – With possible interesting story on the origin of the name "Cafeteria". Could not verify because journal wanted to charge me $20 to read the article.

Dare RK, Chittaganpitch M, Erdman DD. Screening pneumonia patients for mimivirus. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2008 Mar. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

Mimivirus. MicrobiologyBytes, Sept. 11, 2007. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

Mycoplasma genitalium. Wikipedia. Accessed, Dec. 20, 2010.

Mimivirus. Wikipedia. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

First Virophage Could Take the Fight to Viruses. New Scientist, Aug. 6, 2008. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

Even Viruses Get the Blues. Wired Science, Aug. 6, 2008. Accessed Dec. 20, 2010.

About The Author: Jennifer Frazer is a biodiversity blogger and AAAS Science Journalism Award-winning science writer who has written for the Wyoming Tribune-Eagle, The Boston Globe, The (Louisville) Courier-Journal, High Country News, and Fungi Magazine. She holds two biology degrees from Cornell University and a Master's Degree in science writing from MIT. She writes about the spectrum of life on Earth at her blog, The Artful Amoeba, and tweets (occasionally) at @JenniferFrazer. Like David St. Hubbins, she is concerned about the potential world domination plans of slime molds.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Read more at www.scientificamerican.com
 

Science of TRON: Getting Up to Speed with Teleportation and Quantum Computing

Science of TRON: Getting Up to Speed with Teleportation and Quantum Computing

Physicists give TRON filmmakers the lowdown on how to digitize a person and transport him into a computer game

LOS ANGELES—When Steven Lisberger made the original 1982 cult film TRON, he was ineligible for an Academy Award for visual effects, because he'd used computers—and believe it or not, that was considered a form of cheating at that time.



Fast forward 28 years to the sequel, TRON: Legacy, and not only have computers become a celebrated part of its filmmaking, but the movie's story and design address the significant advances made in the fields of quantum computing and artificial intelligence since then.



"We weren't interested in making a movie about technology—we'd talk about the technology through the relationships between characters," says director Joe Kosinski. "You won't hear about gigabytes and Twitter and Google, because any technical jargon would be dated five years from now. Once you got into the world of TRON, we thought of it more as a Western with another set of rules."



But those rules had to be plausible. Long before TRON: Legacy began filming, Kosinski and producer Sean Bailey spent hours picking the brains of physicists, neuroscientists and roboticists for ideas on how to ground high-concept plot points and scene design in actual scientific principals.



In fact, science and technology have been woven directly into the film's promotional campaign, with the latest event occurring Monday night when Kosinski and Bailey reconvened with two of the film's consulting scientists—California Institute of Technology physicist Sean Carroll and retired Jet Propulsion Laboratory physicist John Dick—on the stage of Disney's El Capitan Theater in Hollywood for a screening and panel discussion.



"We wanted a strong science foundation at key moments throughout the film, so we invited some of the smartest people we could find to provide answers we could incorporate,"  Kosinski said. "The discussion improved parts of the story and served as a springboard to better things in the movie."



TRON: Legacy, which picks up 20 years after TRON, chronicles a son's (Garrett Hedlund) search for his father (Jeff Bridges), who is trapped in a computer game that continues to evolve on its own. The panelists summarized some of the topics covered during their initial meetings: what artificial intelligence might look like in human form; how humans might fit into a computerized world; genetic algorithms (computations that improve on themselves based on past performance); and quantum teleportation (instantaneously moving objects over great distances by deconstructing and reconstructing them).



"What has changed in science since the first TRON came out is the creation of quantum computing and teleportation," Dick said. "We brought these ideas to the filmmakers. It is now conceivable that you could one day take a particle in the real world and teleport it into a quantum computer. The process for teleportation would likely involve sending the particle information into the computer, while the hydrogen and oxygen stays in the real world. The idea of emergence is also new. It says that in complex systems, or systems that behave in complex ways, behaviors emerge in ways you could not have predicted. An example of that in the film is the ISO characters [a race of self-created programs]."



That kind of input helped guide Kosinski's aesthetic in overt ways, such as manipulating the laws of physics (aka "heightened physics") to further distinguish the TRON world, as well as in unexplained design subtleties, like having canisters alongside the teleportation electronics—ostensibly to contain the chemicals and gases necessary for reintegrating digitized humans into the physical world.



" The input from the scientists helped tell a more consistent story," Carroll said. "We looked at what happens when computer programs become increasingly intelligent, and genetic algorithms become a big part of programs writing themselves, learning and changing, and going beyond what programmers initially wanted them to do. Would a computer program with a personality and aspirations have the same sense of consciousness as a person? Would you be the same person if you were uploaded into a computer?"



Meanwhile, Kosinski, who holds a degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University, brought his own technical savvy to the table, explaining where he pushed the envelope in filmmaking. He employed the latest generation of the 3D fusion camera system developed by James Cameron that used adjoining digital cameras representing each eye, with lenses that drew in considerable light. The actors' costumes were specially designed illuminated flexible suits. And his rendering team advanced the backwards-aging process they developed for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button to depict Clu, a rogue computer program that looked like a younger Bridges. They used motion-capture sensors on Bridges' face to map a digital head, which was digitally composited on to a younger body double. "It's the first time an actor played against himself at a younger age," Kosinski notes.



Both the panel and meetings between scientists and TRON: Legacy creatives were organized by The National Academy of Sciences' Science and Entertainment Exchange, which pairs scientists and filmmakers for more accurate depictions of scientific principals in films and television. Since forming two years ago, the organization has picked up steam as both audiences and rising filmmakers, many of whom grew up in the digital age, have become more technologically sophisticated.



"Most Hollywood people don't ever talk to or think about scientists—there's a cultural barrier," Carroll said. "But science benefits when movies are more faithful to how scientists work, and movies benefit if they take science more seriously."
Read more at www.scientificamerican.com
 

Halliburton pays $32 million to settle bribery charges in Nigeria against former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney

Amplify’d from www.upi.com

Halliburton settles with Nigeria

HOUSTON, Dec. 22 (UPI) -- Halliburton said it would pay more than $32 million to settle bribery charges in Nigeria against former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney and other executives.

Nigeria accused officials from Halliburton and its former subsidiary KBR of paying as much as $180 million to Nigerian officials to win a $6 billion contract to build a liquefied natural gas plant.

KBR filed a guilty plea in a U.S. court in 2009 on charges that it paid bribes for Nigerian contracts from 1995 to 2004. The company split from Halliburton in 2007.

Cheney resigned from his post as Halliburton chief executive to serve under U.S. President George W. Bush in 2000.

Halliburton announced in a statement that it agreed to pay $32.5 million to the Nigerian government and pay an additional $2.5 million to pay for attorney fees and expenses.

"Pursuant to this agreement, all lawsuits and charges against KBR and Halliburton corporate entities and associated persons have been withdrawn," the company said. Abuja, Halliburton added, agreed to withhold further legal action against Halliburton or its affiliates.

Nigeria blamed former and current executives at both companies. KBR said Chief Executive Officer William Utt, who is charged in the case, wasn't at the company during the time of the alleged bribes.

"The actions of the Nigerian government suggest that its officials are wildly and wrongly asserting blame in this matter," said KBR in an early December statement.

Read more at www.upi.com
 

Lightning could signal volcanic eruptions

Amplify’d from www.upi.com

Lightning could signal volcanic eruptions

UPI POY 2008 - News and Features

SEATTLE, Dec. 22 (UPI) -- A worldwide network of lightning detectors is being put to a new use detecting volcanic eruptions that could be hazardous to aviation, U.S. researchers say.

In its first months of test operations in Alaska and the Russian Far East, the system operated by the University of Washington spotted two eruptions a full hour before they showed up on satellite images, The Seattle Times reported Tuesday.

The churning clouds unleashed by explosive volcanic eruptions generate lightning, which antennas can identify by their distinctive low-frequency radio signatures.

Such detections could provide valuable warning time for aircraft, whose engines can fail when clogged with volcanic ash.

"If we're able to get an extra 30 or 60 minutes more of a heads-up, it could be a real contribution," vulcanologist John Ewert of the U.S. Geological Survey's Cascades Volcano Observatory said.

UW space-sciences professor Robert Holzworth has managed the World Wide Lightning Location Network since 2004, expanding it from a handful of stations to 52 around the world.

More than 3 million lightning strokes are logged by the system every month, and only a tiny fraction are from volcanoes.

But those are fairly easy to spot because they're usually not associated with a storm, Holzworth said.

Read more at www.upi.com
 

U.K. telescope array yields first images

Amplify’d from www.upi.com

U.K. telescope array yields first images

MANCHESTER, England, Dec. 22 (UPI) -- An array of radio telescopes in Britain has captured images of a galaxy pouring out a huge jet of matter from the black hole at its center, researchers say.

The first images from the new e-Merlin array of linked telescopes show a distant quasar 9 billion light years from Earth, SPACE.com reported Wednesday.

Quasars, energy-spewing supermassive black holes at the center of galaxies, are among the brightest objects in the universe.

The e-Merlin images were of an object dubbed the "Double Quasar" because its light gets bent around another galaxy closer to Earth by the curvature of space, resulting in a "gravitational lens" that produces multiple, magnified images of the same quasar, scientists said.

"This first image of the Double Quasar clearly demonstrates how useful e-Merlin is going to be in our studies of gravitational lenses," Neal Jackson of the University of Manchester said. "By mapping the bending of light by mass, we will be able to study the way in which both stars and dark matter are distributed in galaxies and how this changes as the universe evolves."

The e-Merlin array will serve as Britain's national facility for radio astronomy.

The array will produce detailed radio images of stars and galaxies using seven telescopes spread up to 137 miles apart across Britain working as one.

Read more at www.upi.com
 

Biodiversity at mercy of cosmic rays?

Amplify’d from www.upi.com

Biodiversity at mercy of cosmic rays?

LAWRENCE, Kan., Dec. 22 (UPI) -- A regular rise and fall of biodiversity in Earth's past may be linked to our solar system's rhythmic movement around the Milky Way, U.S. researchers say.

About every 60 million years, our solar system moves above the average plane of our galaxy's disk, and in the same 60-million-year cycle, the biodiversity of life on Earth drops significantly.

Researchers theorize the former occurrence drives the latter because of increased exposure to high-energy subatomic particles called cosmic rays coming from intergalactic space, SPACE.com reported Wednesday.

Usually, the Milky Way's magnetic field shields the solar system from these rays, but every 60 million years or so, our solar system pops up above the northern edge of our galaxy's disk, exposing Earth to more cosmic rays,

That radiation might be contributing to large die-offs of the creatures on Earth, scientists say.

Researchers at the University of Kansas say they've put some hard numbers to the theory for the first time.

When the solar system raises its head out of the galactic plane, radiation exposure at the Earth's surface shoots up, possible by as much as a factor of 24, they say.

"Even with the lowest assumption, this exposure provides a real stress on the biosphere periodically," said lead author Dimitra Atri.

The solar system is on the upswing now, moving toward the northern edge of the galactic disk, but researchers say it's too soon to worry.

Big increases in cosmic-ray exposure are probably still about 10 million years off, the say.

Read more at www.upi.com
 

Congress Fails to Pass Whistle-blower Rights Bill

Amplify’d from www.newsmax.com
Congress Fails to Pass Whistle-blower Rights Bill

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress failed to pass a bill before adjourning that would have barred most federal departments from punishing employees who report corruption, waste and mismanagement.

The whistle-blower protection bill cleared the House on Wednesday evening, but died in the Senate as time expired on the lame duck session.

In a last-minute effort to win GOP support for the legislation, Democrats removed provisions that would have extended the protections to workers at U.S. intelligence agencies. Republicans had linked the legislation to the WikiLeaks scandal, suggesting that the bill, unless watered down, could lead to further leaks of U.S. secrets.

The bill's backers disputed the claim, saying the bill would not permit public disclosures of classified information.

Read more at www.newsmax.com
 

Michael Savage Sues Talk Syndicator

Amplify’d from www.newsmax.com
Michael Savage Sues Talk Syndicator
Conservative radio talk show host Michael Savage has filed a lawsuit against his syndicator Talk Radio Network, claiming TRN is attempting to force him into “indentured servitude.”



Savage’s contract with TRN expires at the end of the year, and he has Michael, Savage, Sues, Talk, Syndicatorreceived an offer to move his show to Courtside Radio, which is headed by Norman Pattiz, founder of industry giant Westwood One.



According to court papers, the proposed Savage network would have links to the RightNetwork, an on-demand video service backed by actor Kelsey Grammer and sports and media mogul Ed Snider. Savage’s contract with Pattiz offers him 1 percent of the equity in the fledgling network.



TRN has the right to match an outside offer and has attempted to do so, but Savage asserts in his suit filed Monday that TRN’s proposal falls short of the offer from Courtside Radio. For example, he argues that TRN can’t match the stock equity offer proffered by RightNetwork.



Savage’s suit filed in federal court in the Northern District of California states: “Through the use of illegal and unenforceable contract provisions . . . and other strong-arm tactics designed to intimidate Dr. Savage, TRN is attempting to force Dr. Savage into accepting a sub-standard agreement containing what can only be described as an indentured servitude provision.”



The suit claims the TRN offer falls short financially and contains anticompetitive provisions that limit Savage’s negotiating rights and other terms not in the Courtside proposal.



The lawsuit also maintains that Savage’s show — which currently reaches about 8 million listeners a week — would receive “greater publicity” by moving to Westwood One’s Courtside Radio, and charges that TRN is attempting to “force him into an arbitration that wholly ignores his due process rights.”



Savage seeks a declaration that TRN failed to match Courtside’s offer and that an arbitration provisions in his TRN contract is illegal and unenforceable.



Without a favorable court ruling, Savage’s suit states, he faces the “significant risk of losing the Courtside opportunity, which is valued at several million dollars, and being forced to submit into an illegal arbitration.”



TRN’s President and CEO Mark Masters said: “Michael’s lawsuit against us is unjustified and frivolous” and “we are 100 percent confident that the courts will justify our position.”



Talkers magazine reports that Savage is the third-most listened to radio host in the nation behind Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, and his show is currently aired on more than 300 stations across the nation.

Read more at www.newsmax.com