ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Wikileaks: Vatican Used Diplomatic Immunity to Avoid Questions about Child-abuse in Ireland

Amplify’d from www.ktfministry.org

It has been known for quite a while that the Vatican used its diplomatic-immunity status to thwart the Irish independent investigation of sex-abuse by Irish priests. But U.S. diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks revealed that the Vatican was “offended” that Ireland failed to respect Holy See “sovereignty” by asking Vatican officials to answer questions from the Irish commission.

The U.S. ambassador to the Vatican “condemned the leaks and said the Vatican and America cooperate in promoting universal values.” That would be Vatican values of course.

One leaked document revealed the complicity of the Irish diplomats in Rome. The cable discussed Ireland’s diplomatic bind. “Ireland wanted to be seen as fully supportive of the independent probe into child-abuse cover-ups in the Dublin Archdiocese,” but the U.S. diplomat reported that the Irish diplomats in Rome decided not to press Vatican officials to respond to questions from the Irish commission. Letters sent to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Vatican’s ambassador to Ireland seeking information on Vatican officials’ knowledge of cover-ups, were never answered.

The leaked cables reveal that “the investigators’ letters ‘offended many in the Vatican’ because they were viewed as ‘an affront to Vatican sovereignty.’”

Critics say that “the Vatican was concerned only about protecting itself, not about admitting the truth.” In spite of Vatican statements of concern for the victims, the Vatican was apparently concerned that the Irish government had failed to protect the Vatican from intrusive questions.

“Self-interest ruled the day when their priests were raping children,” said Andrew Madden, a former altar boy who was molested by a Dublin priest.

Revelation 17:4, 5 says that “the woman (Church) was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication; and upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.”

Read more at www.ktfministry.org
 

White House Gives Go-ahead For Elitists to Control DNA :

Michael Edwards

Activist Post



It is official: in the name of “clean energy, pollution control and medicine,” the White House is prepared to let scientists, spearheaded by the J. Craig Venter Institute, “manipulate DNA of organisms to forge new life forms,” according to a recent AFP article.



The Orwellian language used by Barack Obama’s Presidential Commission For The Study of Bioethical Issues is a study in wordiness, misdirection, and obfuscation that is typical when trying to cover up the true intent. For example, on one hand the Commission acknowledges that the J. Craig Venter Institute has found the ability to forge new life forms, but also states that Venter’s team didn’t create life, since the work primarily involved altering an already existing life form.



Since we won’t get straight truth from the mainstream media, science, or the government, it is better advised to look at who Craig Venter is, and what public statements have been issued about this agenda that literally could transform the human race from a naturally evolving species into a manipulated computer code.



As far back as 2003, a BBC article titled Warning on Gene ‘ID Cards’ cited Craig Venter as a leading scientist in gene mapping who, at the time, was offering the “very rich” a chance to buy their map for $710,000. This sets up, in effect, a division of gene class where elites would have access to potentially life-saving information, while the underclass could be discriminated against by insurance companies and employers. The short article concludes with an even more critical warning by Dr. Helen Wallace of GeneWatch that, “What we could end up with is a massive DNA database by the back door.” And this was almost 8 years ago.



In the intervening time, the possible misuse of such a database became clear in 2006 when collaboration between the J. Craig Venter Institute and Google resulted in a ZDNet article titled Google Accused of Bio-Piracy. Plans were revealed to “create a searchable online database of all the genes on the planet.” The source of this story came from a Pulitzer Prize winner, David Vise, but to this day it seems that neither the J. Craig Venter Institute, nor Google have acknowledged any ongoing partnership.



The Institute announced in May of this year that it finally had created the first self-replicating, synthetic bacterial cell, dubbed Synthia by the media. Most people probably concluded that this was a rather innocuous, self-promoting announcement designed to receive funding. However, if one looks deeper into this press release, one should notice the words “synthetic genome.” This is an admission that goes beyond simply altering an existing life form, as the Institute asserts, but illustrates the ability to replicate the entirety of an organism’s hereditary information.



The technical breakdown of this initiative is exceedingly important, but is better left to experts in the field. Regardless, the assertions of the J. Craig Venter Institute have found the “software of life” are being taken seriously by the White House at a time when revelations about how computing, medicine, technology, and the police state are converging on an almost daily basis. In just the past month, the following stories made headlines:



* Lawsuits have been filed in Austin, TX by parents who have discovered that DNA had been secretly taken from babies and sold to pharmaceutical companies and/or the Armed Forces for genetic research as far back as 2002.

* Unions have started to implement biometric ID “threat assessment” cards at the behest of Homeland Security in a “cooperative effort between public and private authorities.”

* Iris scan technology is being used by NYC law enforcement to create a biometric database in homage to Minority Report.

* GM Mosquitoes have been released in the Cayman Islands to combat Dengue fever, while noted depopulation advocate, Bill Gates, has been funding the initiative.

* Connections have been made between the above-mentioned Dengue fever mosquito release to the history of CIA bioweapons research, as well as various NGOs and Globalist think tanks that will apply the funding of The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation toward “flying vaccines” as a solution to the “problem” of viruses.



It is worth adding that part of the stated purpose of the first artificial cell, Synthia, is “faster vaccine production.”



The flowery language that comes from elite circles about Utopian equality ring empty in the face of their documented history of discriminatory programs and depopulation initiatives. Giving over our blood, and now our life force, to elites who long ago distanced themselves from the concerns of the average man and woman does not bode well for the health of humanity.


F.B.I. Asking YOU To Report People (Your Neighbors) Doing Things That Ap...

F.B.I. Asking YOU To Report People (Your Neighbors) Doing Things That Appear Suspicious


RFID in Casino Chips? Police State!

Amplify’d from theintelhub.com

RFID in Casino Chips? Police State!

Editors Note: This is just another way to illegally track American citizens. We are slowly being introduced to different tracking devices all in the name of security.

Slate

What’s the point of stealing casino chips?

Another hitch is that many casinos embed radio frequency, or RFID, tags into their high-value chips—$1,000 and above, possibly, though the casinos are tight-lipped on this point. These devices serve two purposes. One is to prevent counterfeiting: If a cashier scans a chip that’s supposed to have an RFID but doesn’t, it’s probably a fake. (Most counterfeiting involves lower-denomination chips: The most common way to counterfeit a chip is to repaint a $1 piece to look like, say, a $100 piece.) RFIDs also serve as individualized bar codes to keep track of every chip. With the right technology, the Bellagio can figure out exactly which chips were stolen. And if anyone tried to cash them, he’d get nabbed.

Read more at theintelhub.com
 

Just 17% Say They Are Happy With The Way Things Are Going in the United States

Amplify’d from www.hapblog.com


Just 17% Say They Are Happy With The Way Things Are Going in the United States

And here's the one steering our country...


gallup.com
PRINCETON, NJ -- Seventeen percent of Americans say they are satisfied with the way things are going in the United States at this time, the low point in a year when satisfaction levels generally have been in the 20% range
% Satisfied
The United States' continuing economic struggles are likely the reason behind the low satisfaction levels. Gallup's "most important problem" question confirms this, as 30% of Americans say the economy in general is the top problem and 24% say unemployment or jobs specifically, easily the top two issues mentioned. Thirteen percent mention dissatisfaction with the government, 10% the federal budget deficit, and 8% healthcare
Top ten concerns to voters
Read more at www.hapblog.com
 

Belarus erupts

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
Belarus erupts
Russ Jones - OneNewsNow

BelarusMINSK, BELARUS - A peaceful demonstration turned violent as some 20,000 protesters took to the streets of Minsk, Belarus, after elections there on Sunday.

With shouts of "free Belarus" filling the streets, the landlocked nation in Eastern Europe became volatile when protesters stormed the Belarusian parliament in central Minsk after preliminary election results were announced. Protesters claim the elections were fraudulent.

 

Reports indicate President Alexander Lukashenko has won a fourth term in office by gaining nearly 80 percent of vote. Some have concerns with voting irregularities.

 

Silver Meikar, a member of the Estonian Reform Party since 1997 and a member of the parliament of Estonia, has great concern for the people of Belarus. "I think the biggest loser of this [very bloody] event...were the people [who were] very peacefully demonstrating for a better life, for more democracy, for human rights and so on," he laments.

 

According to Meiker, those who participated in the unsanctioned protests could suffer severe punishments.

 

The U.S. Embassy in Belarus has condemned the excessive use of force by the authorities, including the beating and detention of several presidential candidates. The foremost opposition leader Vladimir Neklyayev was one such candidate beaten and taken to a nearby hospital. Activists claim four plain-clothed men wrapped Neklyayev in a blanket and took him from the hospital to an unknown location.

 
Editor's note: Dozens of international journalists, including OneNewsNow's Russ Jones, were trapped in the lobby of Hotel Minsk where police barricaded the front doors, not allowing them outside. Jones reports he came "inches" from being clubbed while shooting video during the protests.
Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

Warnings issued over rushing through DADT repeal

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
Warnings issued over rushing through DADT repeal
Fred Jackson - OneNewsNow

Now that the Senate has voted to repeal the 17-year-old ban against homosexuals serving openly in the U.S. military, a number of groups have issued warnings over the consequences of Saturday's decision.

Eight Republican senators joined with Democrats on Saturday to put an end to forcing homosexuals in the military to keep their sexual preference to themselves -- a policy which became known as "don't ask don't tell." (Final roll call vote: 65-31)

A former Army chaplain who now recruits military chaplains says by repealing the ban, Congress has redefined morality, with uncertain consequences. Retired Brig. Gen. Doug Lee tells The Associated Press that chaplains from the churches he represents could be forced to choose between their career and their calling to teach and counsel what the Bible says about homosexuality. Lee notes that the Bible says, "Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil."

President Barack Obama is expected to sign the repeal into law this week, although changes to military policy probably won't take effect for several months. Under the bill, the president and his top military advisers must first certify that lifting the ban won't hurt military cohesion, recruitment or retention. Repeal would mean that, for the first time in U.S. history, homosexual men and women would be openly accepted by the armed forces and could acknowledge their sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out.

Passed with needless haste

Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness says history will note that the outgoing 111th Congress acted with needless haste allowing no time for substantive hearings to examine findings and controversial recommendations in the Pentagon's Comprehensive Review Working Group Report.

Homosexuals in Military (compliments of CMR)She says liberals in Congress knew that the report could not withstand informed scrutiny, so "Senator Susan Collins [R-Maine] persuaded others to join her in breaking their word on legislative priorities -- a betrayal that belied previous statements calling for full and open debate."

In a statement released on Sunday, Donnelly outlined several issues in the Pentagon's Working Group report which now must be dealt with:

• A mandate to “prohibit the creation of separate bathroom and shower facilities based on sexual orientation” (p. 18). Such a policy, tantamount to forced cohabitation of men with military women, would disregard normal dynamics of human sexuality.  Local commanders dealing with unprecedented problems would be, essentially, on their own.

• Mandatory “three-tiered” education program, focusing on resistant combat troops, to change attitudes and opinions on LGBT issues (pp. 25-26). The plan does not suggest ways to get personnel accustomed to routine personal exposure to others who may be sexually attracted to them, in conditions of “forced intimacy” offering little or no privacy. 

• Punishments for “resistance” -- i.e., zero tolerance of anyone who disagrees for any reason, including “moral or religious beliefs” (pp. 50-51). Senate testimony confirmed that an undetermined number of chaplains having moral conflicts with LGBT policies would be lost to the service. The report concedes that on the issue of religious freedom for chaplains, “boundaries are not always clearly defined” (p. 16 and p. 80). Litigation is guaranteed, but Congress has surrendered decision-making power to unelected bureaucrats or federal courts.

• Repeal of certain personal conduct provisions in the UCMJ, eliminating or lowering some standards to accommodate consensual homosexual conduct (p. 18). Congress has just voted to repeal statutory findings that rules of conduct apply both on- and off-base.

• Unresolved issues involving marital status, including disparities in benefits and access to family medical care in states that do not recognize same-sex "marriages," plus access to military family housing for opposite- and same-sex unmarried couples (pp. 19-21). Again, the courts will likely decide, at the behest of administration who will cite LGBT Law in the military to accomplish repeal of the DOMA.

• Unresolved questions about morale and costs related to the retention of HIV+ personnel, who must be retained in non-deployable status under current regulations (p. 22).

Meanwhile, the conservative legal group, Alliance Defense Fund, issued a statement after the vote saying" "The Senate's cave-in to pressure from activists to impose homosexual behavior on our military will place our troops' religious liberties in unprecedented jeopardy. Indeed, the first official casualty of this hurried vote may well be the religious freedom of chaplains and Service members."  ADF itigation counsel Daniel Blomberg went on to say "no Americans, and especially not our troops, should be forced to abandon their religious beliefs."

ADF says it stands ready to defend Service members if they are ever unconstitutionally required to choose between "serving their country or obeying their God as a result of this damaging policy decision."

What's the key reason the ban on 'gays' in the military has been repealed?

Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

The Age of Unforgiveness

The Age of Unforgiveness
God forgets. That's one of the great things that separates man from God. Where a man holds a grudge, though they might say all is forgiven, God closes the books and then burns it for added protection. Ultimately, man forgets—if not forgives; with time any fire simmers. Maybe friendships will be lost, but time heals all things and people eventually move on...well that's how it used to be.



Is forgiveness truly possible in the age of Facebook?



For the first time ever, everything is recorded. That picture you took in college before you were a Christian drinking beer at a party, wall updates about things you might have did that were questionable, even political statements. It's all there. Forever.



Hitting the delete button no longer means delete; it means erased from your memory, perhaps. But it does not mean removed from the friend of a friend who hit "like" to your update, or the person you only sort of knew who decided to post your picture on their personal blog.



Once there was a time when we could start over—even if it meant moving away to a place where friends didn't know you. That's no longer. It all comes back to haunt us.



Salvation used to be this powerfully moving experience—a wave of joy overfilled you as you thought about everything from before removed—washed away and your sins are forgive. And it still is. Until you go home, log onto the Internet and see your sins are still there.



When you become born again, there's that feeling of joy and excitement, and when you come down from the high the healing begins; in those delicate moments after salvation, God begins to work in you and shape who you are and who you will be.



There is no baptism on Facebook. There is no way to wash away sins.



The challenges for the modern Christian are more difficult than any age before us, because unlike Christians yesterday: our sins are forgiven, our sins are remembered. Our healing period is plagued with reminders that can make healing more difficult, and our old self is forever out there to remind us, and perhaps entice us, of the old ways.



Is it fair for a church to check the Internet history of someone they are considering hiring? By the laws of man, yes. It shouldn't matter what someone did yesterday, but for some, the fact that it's out there means that it does.



The Bible teaches forgiveness, but that doctrine becomes much harder to follow when it's so easy to see just what a person needs to be forgiven of. That healing that comes after salvation--the one that's between you and God--it's just not the same. When people know what your sins were, they want to be the judge of how you should heal; somehow the experience of salvation becomes a lot less personal when Internet looms over us.



There are now two people who duel for your life. God—the one who fights for you. And the Internet—the one who remembers you—the one who reminds you—the one who can so easily control your life.



I'd like to say there's a work around in all of this, but there's not. As Christians, it is our responsibility to help a person through that healing period, but that can be hard when sins never truly go away from man.



As the Internet expands, it's only going to get smarter and remember more. For Christians, that means it's only going to get harder for forgiveness. We will accept what we did, and we will hand it over to God who will forgive us; and then we will face the Facebook--accepting that what we handed over to God was only the start of the healing; the real healing begins when we consider that what we have handed over can only be forgiven, not forgotten. Part of forgiveness of sins has always been acceptance of them; but it's a lot easier to accept what you were ten years ago when you don't have to see pictures that remind you of the fact.



It's the age of Facebook--God help us all.
Read more at www.disturbedchristians.com
 

Links between Murders in Turkey and ‘Masterminds’ Expected

Amplify’d from www.compassdirect.org
Links between Murders in Turkey and ‘Masterminds’ Expected


Witnesses previously barred will be allowed to testify.



ISTANBUL, December 20
(CDN) —
Attorneys prosecuting the murder of three Christians in southeastern Turkey are making progress linking the knifemen who slayed them to the masterminds who put them up to it, an attorney representing the family of one of the victims said Friday (Dec.17).


Two witnesses, Veysel Şahin and Ercan Gelni – whose testimony the court previously blocked – will be allowed to testify about the plans behind the killings in Malatya. The judge changed his previous ruling blocking their testimonies because of new evidence that recently became available.


The court will also protect a witness whose testimony would have possibly put him in danger. The latest court hearing was on Dec. 3.


On April 18, 2007, two Turkish Christians, Necati Aydin and Ugur Yuksel, and German Christian Tilmann Geske, were bound, tortured and then murdered at the office of Zirve Publishing Co., a Christian publishing house in Malatya.


The suspects, Salih Guler, Cuma Ozdemir, Hamit Ceker, and Abuzer Yildirim were arrested while trying to escape the scene of the crime, as was alleged ringleader Emre Gunaydin.


Establishing Links
Prosecutors have contended that the killings were related to a larger conspiracy by the military and nationalists to destabilize the government by targeting minorities in Turkish society.


“The people responsible are not just confined to the young men caught at the crime scene,” said Orhan Cengiz, one of the attorneys representing the interests of the victim’s families in the case. “Everybody knows the youngsters have connections [to the nationalists].”


The new decision shows the court’s “willingness” to look into possible links between the killers and the gendarmerie, a special police force in Turkey that deals with internal security issues and is allegedly a key player in the destabilization plot, Cengiz said.


Suzanne Geske, widow of Tilmann Geske, said she wants the Malatya murder trial linked with the trial over the Cage Operation Action Plan, believed to be part of the Ergenekon “deep state” operation to destabilize the government.


“I want the Zirve Publishing House killings to be merged with the case into the Cage Operation Action Plan,” Geske told Turkish newspaper Today’s Zaman. “I do not believe that those young men could have carried out the murders on their own. Some de facto links are evident. There are other influences behind these murders.”


Ergenekon is an alleged “deep state” operation referring to a group of retired generals, politicians and other key figures thought by some to be the true power brokers in Turkey.


The Cage Plan centers on a compact disc found a year ago in the house of a retired naval officer. The plan, to be carried out by 41 naval officers, termed as “operations” the Malatya killings, the 2006 assassination of Catholic priest Andrea Santoro and the 2007 slaying of Hrant Dink, Armenian editor-in-chief of the weekly Agos.


Newspapers have reported that the Cage Plan, aimed at Turkey’s non-Muslim minorities, not only contained a list of names of Protestant Christians who would be targeted, but also named some of their children.


“I believe that there is an ulterior motive behind the killings,” Geske reportedly said. “This may be linked to Ergenekon or another criminal group. I believe that the young men who carried out the murders were directed by criminal elements. I want those criminal elements to be exposed. Otherwise, the lives of those young men will be wasted while the real criminals will go unpunished.”


The next Malatya hearing is scheduled for Jan. 20.



END
Read more at www.compassdirect.org