ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

What Is Facebook's New 'Memories' Feature?

Amplify’d from gawker.com

What Is Facebook's New 'Memories' Feature?Yesterday, we introduced you to Facebook's new face-recognition feature. Today, hints emerge of yet another new feature called "memories". What is Facebook's "memories," and how will it help us embarrass ourselves on the Internet?

Memories was accidentally revealed today to a few Facebook users, then quickly yanked amid a 30 minute (!!!) outage. (See a screenshot via The Next Web above.) Hopefully, it's some kind of super-advanced filter that automatically applies a rose-tinted lens to your past, wiping out all ex-girlfriends and those pictures of you passed out on the floor of an ice-fishing hut wearing only a hot dog costume. (Don't ask.)

Realistically, it appears to be a feature that lets you see all of your Facebook activity for a given year via a timeline. Makes sense, now that some people have had Facebook accounts for as long as the Simpsons were good. (Seven years.): "Ah, yes... 2006 was a banner year. I liked so many funny YouTube videos and Huffington Post op-eds. Oh, here's one of my finest status updates; it's only gotten better with age, like a fine wine! Precious memories, each and every one."


Send an email to Adrian Chen, the author of this post, at adrian@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

LAPD has released a gallery of 160 women whose pictures were found in the 'Grim Sleepers' killer's home

Amplify’d from gawker.com

LAPD has released a gallery of 160 women whose pictures were found in the 'Grim Sleepers' killer's home.


Send an email to Adrian Chen, the author of this post, at adrian@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Wikileaks: Banned In Antarctica

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Wikileaks: Banned In AntarcticaOur government's idiotic war on Wikileaks extends even to America's tiny presence in Antarctica. A memo sent to all Americans in Antarctica effectively censors Wikileaks material from the entire continent. Can't tip off the penguins about our secret plans!

The memo was sent out to the 1,500-or-so Americans currently living in Antarctica as part of the United States Antarctic Program (USAP). It reminds them that leaked Wikileaks documents are still technically classified, and "the transmission, processing, storage, and/or use of classified information with USAP information systems are prohibited." Given that the USAP is in charge of the United States' three Antarctic research bases and their communications networks, this amounts to a total Wikileaks blackout for all Americans in Antarctica, who are mostly scientists and support staff. Never mind that one geologist working with the USAP actually blogs for the New York Times, which has been publishing many of Wikileaks' leaked cables.

Maybe all government employees should just be sent to Antarctica until this whole Wikileaks thing blows over. It's the only way to protect America.

Here's the memo, via Big Dead Place:

Wikileaks: Banned In Antarctica

Wikileaks: Banned In Antarctica
image via elisfanclub


Send an email to Adrian Chen, the author of this post, at adrian@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Mexican Spy Plane Crashes in Texas: We are now at war with Mexico?

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Mexican Spy Plane Crashes in TexasA remote-controlled drone owned and operated by the government of Mexico crashed "in someone's backyard" near El Paso last week. What was it doing there?

According to Talking Points Memo, a "mini orbiter UAV" drone crashed into someone's backyard in El Paso's Lower Valley around 6:30 p.m. "We were told it was not a police matter," El Paso detective Mike Baranyay told the El Paso Times, most likely in the tone of voice where you totally know some kind of wicked intimidating government agent in sunglasses was all, "Excuse me, detective—we'll take it from here."

Apparently, border patrol turned the drone over to the Mexican government "at one of the bridges which span the U.S.-Mexico border" (again, classic scene in the movie about this incident that I am currently watching, inside my head). "We may or may not do a report on this," says a National Transportation Safety Board spokesperson.

Okay, well, breaking news: Our government is sketchy as hell. But I still want to know what the drone was doing! Was it spying on... El Paso? Of all places? (I mean, we use our drones to kill people who we heard from some guy are maybe terrorists, and whichever people are near the people who we think might probably be terrorists. So maybe it was doing, uh, that?) Either way, one thing's for certain: We are now at war with Mexico.


Send an email to Max Read, the author of this post, at max@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Are You God’s Shadow?

Amplify’d from sabbathsermons.com

Are You God’s Shadow?

Let Us Make Man in Our Image


In the beginning God created our planet. God says and it’s done. This demonstrates the power of his word right at the beginning of the bible. Even if you go to the end of the bible which is the Revelation of Jesus Christ it is also about a creation of God saying let us make man in our image. This is a revelation of God in creation. At the end of this planet is a revelation of Jesus Christ at the end of the bible to be in his people in the last days. God said let there be light and there was light. God said and it was so.


Genesis 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.


1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.


When God creates man he doesn’t just say let there be man. He said let there be light. Let them make man in our image after our likeness.


Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.


There is the thought and then the action. He comes to man today and says let us make man in our image.


A Shadow of Himself



This word image in the Hebrew is the word shadow. God being light you might think perhaps he doesn’t have a shadow as light doesn’t have a shadow. He says let us make man in our image. Was man created identical with God? Was there differences? Is man subject to time? Yes. Is God? No. When God makes man in his image it is not to the dimensions of God but a shadow which is a lesser dimension.  God has greater dimensions than us.  He is not in space but we are in space.  Although we are made in his image we are not identical to God as a shadow is not identical but it resembles them.  God has different dimensions that we don’t have.  We are three dimensional and our shadow is two dimensional. God made man in his image and in his likeness and that is the Hebrew to cast a shadow.


God Made Man in His Image


The sun was shining and I was looking at my shadow and it was incredible, you can’t trick your shadow. There is no time delay between my movement and the shadow. If my image was projected somewhere else in some computer imagery there would be a delay. With a shadow, there is no delay. Zero. I was intrigued with my shadow and everything I did my shadow was doing. I couldn’t do anything my shadow wouldn’t do.  Man was made after God’s image and God created the animals and brought them to Adam wanting to know what Adam was going to call them. He saw this mind exercising himself and Adam named the animals what they were. It was what it was when God created it.  God was making something and man in his purity understands exactly the same.


Genesis 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat [a son] in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:


Adam and has a child.  At that point in time, was Adam holy or fallen? He was fallen. The child that came forth also using the same word was also in his image.


Today we have an imagery of the mind that was given to Adam and Eve through their submission to Satan. You have an imagery of that mind in every child of Adam.  God made man in his image and in his image he could think thoughts after God but he surrendered that and in a fallen state we are in the image of fallen man and think the thoughts after the devil.


That is a problem so God decided to make a plan and this plan is call the plan of Salvation.


Work out your own salvation


We are to work out our own salvation. Coming back to the image that God had created in Adam originally and he worked out that which God did. Now we have the exact same purpose. God has not changed his purpose. He hasn’t changed. We have this working out of this salvation. God created man in his image;


The sanctification of the soul by the working of the Holy Spirit is the implanting of Christ’s nature in humanity. Gospel religion is Christ in the life–a living, active principle. It is the grace of Christ revealed in character and wrought out in good works. The principles of the gospel cannot be disconnected from any department of practical life. Every line of Christian experience and labor is to be a representation of the life of Christ. {COL 384.1}


Can you disconnect your shadow from doing something’s? Can there be differences there? There can’t be any disconnection form any part of life. While I’m walking in the light I have a shadow and it will do what I do in every department of life. That is my image.  There is no room for any other action, no room. How would you feel if you were walking along and your shadow decided to walk the other way? You would think what is going on?


That is how it was when God created man. There was no disunity but man went off and did something else and was the image of something else. That is theft. We need a representative and we are called to be Christs representatives.


The path of the upright is the path of peace. It is so plain that the humble, God-fearing man can walk in it without stumbling and without making crooked paths. It is a narrow path; but men of different temperaments can walk side by side if they but follow the Captain of their salvation. {LHU 222.2}



If you come from one mind set and I from another, if we become the shadow of God, we will do the same thing. If we are not doing the same things, there is a lack of copying the original. If we would be the shadow of the same person we would all be doing the same thing and there would be perfect harmony.


Sanctification Is a Process of Us Learning


Matthew 16:24 Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any [man] will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.


If you want to be the shadow of Christ you aren’t be your won. You can’t walk where you want to walk, act or do. Otherwise you can’t follow Christ. Does your shadow follow you? Everywhere. Whoever wants to follow him to become his image, a representative to represent him, there must be a denial of what actions and movements of things we want to do. No man can serve two masters. No one can be a shadow of two objects, only one.  We are to be a shadow of what Christ wants us to be.


What Does Jesus Want Us To Follow?


Think About Christ and consider our standing whether we are being his image.


1 Peter 2:20 For what glory [is it], if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer [for it], ye take it patiently, this [is] acceptable with God.


2:21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:


2:22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:


This is our calling, what we are called to do. We are called to follow his movements. You see those movements then you do them. What image is he wanting to bring us to? The movements that he created in the beginning? It was good, very good.  This is what we are wanting us to copy. He is making the movements of creation all over again.


He Reviled Not Again


His movements are;


1 Peter 2:23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed [himself] to him that judgeth righteously:


2:24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.


Have you ever considered this text when it says when he was reviled he reviled not again? What does this mean? What does the word revile mean? When he is provoked. When someone is coming to irritate him or to afflict him or to annoy him or to do something to get his movements out of sync with creation.


What does the devil want us to do? Anything but the image of God. The movements that the devil is trying to get us to do is to come out of the holiness we are trying to imitate. He wants you to snap, lose your cool act out of sync with the movements of God as then you are not his shadow. If the shadow is acting differently God will say it’s not my shadow. If we don’t act like God we are not in his image.


This is reviling. Putting two people together that are of different temperaments. Put two people of different temperament together and they will be out of sync. Satan is putting us in a situation where we will be reviled as it says here unto were you brought. The reason is to meet a different temperament but to still act as Jesus acted. To meet an annoyance that someone is provoking me but not to retaliate. That is why we are called as it is demonstrating who we are copying.  Jesus when he was reviled – reviled not again. Who in his self bear our sins in his own body. When did he bear our sins in his own body? Calvary? Gethsemane?


Isaiah 53:3 He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were [our] faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not. (sorrow, grief).


53:4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.


53:5 But he [was] wounded for our transgressions, [he was] bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace [was] upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.


53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.


Does that sound like a shadow? No we have turned our own way.


Isaiah 53:7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.


Picture being reviled.  Someone is provoking you.  Imagine yourself in a situation where you are carrying grief internally that no one knows about and then someone provokes you while you are carrying this grief. Not just grief but condemnation so you are feeling condemned. Think about Christ, his friend betrayed him. His disciples were sleeping. His friends that didn’t betray were asleep. Peter denied him. All the people you like are failing you plus the sins of the world were laid in his body. There is the condemnation of the law, separation from God, my friends have forsaken and denied me as if they don’t even know me. The church is putting me up for death and I am now being provoked. Isn’t that enough? Patience ceases to be virtue. I have grief, I have sorrow, a loss of all things and now you are coming to provoke me and you are spitting in my face, that is too much now.


Is that what our creator did? He didn’t do that. If someone is provoking me with their disposition with straight out words smiting and I have my personal issues and personal griefs that this person doesn’t know about and my family is provoking me and God seems far and if we act and let it out, are we in his image? Are we acting in concert with the person? Are we being the shadow of the person? We read that he opened not his mouth when he was reviled and that when he was threatened he threatened not. What a character.


The Angels Who Left Their First Estate


This is what we need to practise of him. It is like we have read. We want to be in the society of whom? The angels. Do we want to obey God in concert? Do they always behold his face so they can get his movements right? Do the angels copy him? There were some angels didn’t want to do that. These angels left their first estate. This estate is the best estate to live in. Perth, Australia has some nice estates, but they left their habitation where they were dwelling.


Many Mansions


Jesus says in my father’s house are many mansions. There is room, there is a hole in heaven. They left their home and are now reserved in darkness in everlasting chains. There are some homes that are empty. Mansions, a beautiful estate and Jesus says;


John 14:2 In my Father’s house are many mansions: if [it were] not [so], I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.


14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, [there] ye may be also.


Where You Are Is Your Shadow There?


I was looking at my shadow today and my feet were connected where I was exactly is where my shadow was. I’m going to a place and where I am my shadow should be as well if you will consent to this salvation and to his image and not that of fallen man. These mansions that are in heaven that the angels have are for you and me if we will act in concert with him, he is only going to take his shadow there. Of the 144,000 what does it say? They follow the lamb where ever he goes.


I tried to outrun my shadow and I couldn’t it was following me and I thought why aren’t we like that to God? Why aren’t we beholding the pattern and following it? The pattern was done to my ability. While I’m in the light everything I do, my shadow can do. Everything Jesus did we can do.


We have a different dimension, we are locked in time but God isn’t. God wants us not to be just two dimensional but to take us in to the breadth, and length, and depth, and height; all four dimensions. This is something we can barely comprehend. Jesus is being reviled and two false witness’s came along;


Matthew 26:61 And said, This [fellow] said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days.


26:62 And the high priest arose, and said unto him, Answerest thou nothing? what [is it which] these witness against thee?


26:63 But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.


26:64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.


26:65 Then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, He hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy.


26:66 What think ye? They answered and said, He is guilty of death.


26:67 Then did they spit in his face, and buffeted him; and others smote [him] with the palms of their hands,



Imagine carrying the deepest grief of your whole life and then someone comes and spits at you. How can you take that? He held his peace but was he not raging inside?


Peace


His thoughts were father forgive them as they don’t know what they are doing. He is putting a construction on their actions. In Hosea it’s speaking of Ephraim and they are going backward and God says how can I give thee up? It’s so hard for him to deal out punishment, it is a strange act of God, and he has no pleasure in the death of the wicked. It pains God to hurt them. What attitude is this? When he was reviled he reviled not again.


The image that God created in Eden wasn’t just the shadow we know of but it was also the inward thoughts. He thought Gods thoughts after him. We are not to just hold our tongue and feel angry inside as we are not then shadowing his thoughts. We are to think what he thought – How can I give thee up, forgive them for they know not what they do.


Are We Being Gods Shadow?


As Christians we are being called to be reviled.


The true Christian obtains an experience which brings holiness. He is without a spot of guilt upon the conscience, or a taint of corruption upon the soul. The spirituality of the law of God, with its limiting principles, is brought into his life. The light of truth irradiates his understanding. A glow of perfect love for the Redeemer clears away the miasma which has interposed between his soul and God. (Letter 139, 1898). {7BC 909.8}


When you have miasma or darkening, can there be a shadow in the dark? There can’t be. We need to behold Jesus without the veil as the 144,000 perfect character.  Light means perfect character.  Are we living in the full light that will light the whole world with its glory. Then what should our shadow be?


We are not living in the dark ages but the light of God’s word.


The will of God has become his will, pure, elevated, refined, and sanctified. His countenance reveals the light of heaven. His body is a fit temple for the Holy Spirit. Holiness adorns his character. God can commune with him; for soul and body are in harmony with God (Letter 139, 1898). {7BC 909.8}


We are to be in harmony with the heart of Jesus Christ when bad things happen and when everything in your life has fallen like job and yet trust him.


We embrace the truth of God with our different faculties, and as we come under the influence of that truth, it will accomplish the work for us which is necessary to give us a moral fitness for the kingdom of glory and for the society of the heavenly angels. {AG 351.3}


Only those who act in the image of God will have those mansions and be in the society and estate of heaven where these fallen angels have refused to come back. We have opportunity to become part of the family of God.


Should not every family on earth be a symbol of the family in heaven? In each household should there not be heard songs of praise and thanksgiving? {UL 33.3}


The family whose members love God and one another, who do not get provoked, who are longsuffering, forbearing, kind, is a symbol of the family above. {UL 33.4}


This is a love that loves one another whether others love us or not. Is a symbol also a shadow? Yes. A symbol is an image. Here we are today in our families and our church family and we are to have kindness. When someone does something kind to you, to do something kind back isn’t kindness its duty.


If I fixed your vehicle and you gave me $179.50 are you being kind to me? You are not as it is duty as I have done this and good returns good. But if I didn’t fix your vehicle and you have me $179.50 is that kindness? Yes as I’ve done nothing to deserve it. To be kindness to those who have not been kind is heaven.  If we want to be where he is we are to be connected as my shadow is to my feet.  We are to study Christ’s nature.


Back to Genesis


In the beginning he created and said back then let us make man in our image and he is saying the same today. Let the action follow the thought.


Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.


1:27 So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.



God is wanting your salvation so he says let us make man in our image, what a thought but verse 27 says let be there in your life and so God did make you in his image. It is up to you if you will deny your own responses and everything you are and become his image.  May God help us to do this before he comes as there is no changing when he comes.


Amen.

Read more at sabbathsermons.com
 

California: Stockton Catholic diocese pays $2 million in latest claims of sexual abuse by former priest O’Grady

Amplify’d from www.catholicculture.org
Stockton diocese pays $2 million in latest O'Grady lawsuits

The Diocese of Stockton, California, has settled 2 more lawsuits involving sexual abuse by the notorious former priest Oliver O’Grady.


The diocese agreed to pay out $2 million to settle the latest claims of abuse by O’Grady, who served as a priest in the Stockton diocese from 1971 to 1993. O’Grady, who has served 7 years in California prisons on sex-abuse charges, is the focus of the documentary film Deliver Us from Evil. The Stockton diocese has now paid over $20 million to O’Grady’s victims.


O’Grady, who has been laicized by the Church and deported to his native Ireland, was arrested earlier this week in Dublin on child-pornography charges.

Read more at www.catholicculture.org
 

FBI seeking information from consumers who believe that they have been improperly charged on their telephone bill

Amplify’d from www.fbi.gov
FBI National Press Office
(202) 324-3691

Washington, D.C.


Seeking Information in Alternate Billing Corporation Matter


The FBI is seeking information from consumers who believe that they have been improperly charged on their telephone bill for services neither ordered nor authorized related to Alternate Billing Corp., 24078 Greenway Road, Forest Lake, Minnesota, or any of its affiliated companies or services listed below. 



800VMailbox
BusinessSEOPro
Digital VMail
Durham Technology
eProtectID
eSafeId
Identity Holdings
InfoCall
Instant 411
InstantSEOPro
Matchgamepro
Mobile 411 Plus
My411Connect
MyIDSafe
MyIProducts
NeedTheInfo
ProIdentityProtect
Safeguard My Credit
Streaming Flix
Streaming Flix - FamilyWebSafety
Streaming Flix - Iconz of Rock VIP
Streaming Flix - Mobile
Streaming Flix - National Lampoon
Streaming Flix - No Good TV Digital
Streaming Flix – UBD
Studio 127
Uvolve
VolCoff



Our inquiry is ongoing, and while we can’t provide any additional information at this time, we do need to hear from persons who believe they were improperly billed.



What we need to know:



  1. Your basic contact information, including name, phone numbers, address, and e-mail address;


  2. A list of which company/companies or service(s) billed you;


  3. An estimate of your monetary loss; and


  4. Whether or not you can provide documentation if requested in the future, such as copies of your telephone bills.


How to provide the above information:



  1. Preferred Method—Via an online form on the FBI.gov website: http://forms.fbi.gov/alternate-billing-corp;


  2. Via a dedicated e-mail address: telephone.victim@ic.fbi.gov; or


  3. If you do not have access to a computer, you may mail your information to:


FBI Indianapolis
Alternate Billing Corporation Matter
575 N. Pennsylvania Street, Room 679
Indianapolis, IN 46204



If you have investigative information that might help with this matter, please use our electronic public leads and tips form at https://tips.fbi.gov/.



  • You may also file complaints with the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office, 651-296-3353 or 800-657-3787; or


  • You mail your information to:


Attorney General’s Office
1400 Bremer Tower
445 Minnesota Street
St. Paul, MN 55101



If we determine that you are a victim, we will be in touch with you. Please note: Due to the number of expected responses, it may be some time before you hear back from us.



You may also call our toll-free hotline at 1-855-235-6633 for recorded information regarding this issue. At this time, we are unable to accept messages on this line because of the expected call volume.



Updates, as available, will be provided via FBI.gov and the outgoing message on the toll-free line. We thank you for your patience as we conduct a thorough investigation and work to obtain victims’ information.

Read more at www.fbi.gov
 

Former IRS Agent Sentenced for Soliciting a Bribe

Amplify’d from minneapolis.fbi.gov

Former IRS Agent Sentenced for Soliciting a Bribe

Earlier today in federal court in St. Paul, a tax revenue agent with the Internal Revenue
Service ("IRS") was sentenced for soliciting and receiving a $9,700 bribe. United States District
Court Judge Paul A. Magnuson sentenced Roger Anthony Coombs, age 41, of Circle Pines, to 33
months in federal prison on one count of soliciting and agreeing to receive a bribe. In imposing
the sentence, Judge Magnuson put all federal workers on notice: "I want everyone who draws a
federal paycheck to know that if they solicit a bribe, they are going to jail."

Coombs was indicted on June 21, 2010, and pleaded guilty on August 19, 2010. In his plea
agreement, he admitted that on May 8, 2010, he solicited a $9,700 bribe from the owners of a
small Minnesota business. In exchange for the money, Coombs agreed to report a lower federal
tax obligation than was actually owed by the business. Coombs also admitted receiving
payments toward the bribe on May 19 and June 2, 2010.

Following today's sentencing, Ralph Boelter, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's
Minneapolis field office, said, "Rooting out public corruption is one the FBI's highest priorities.
Corruption committed by government employees or public officials will not be tolerated and will
be vigorously investigated. Public corruption erodes public confidence and undermines the
strength of our democracy. Like many of our investigations, this case started with a tip from a
concerned citizen. We are always grateful for those who come forward to report corruption." The
FBI led the investigation in this case.

A law enforcement affidavit filed in the case states that Coombs, who began working for the
IRS in June of 2009, routinely audited individuals and entities to determine if accurate reports of
tax liabilities had been submitted by them to the federal government. On May 6, 2010, Coombs
met with the two owners of a small Minnesota company for that purpose. The meeting was held
at the office of the company's accountant, but while the accountant was out of the room, Coombs suggested that he and the owners meet elsewhere, unaccompanied by the accountant. As a result,
another meeting was scheduled for May 8.

Because of his concerns about Coombs, one of the business owners secretly recorded the
May 8 meeting, during which Coombs reported that the business owed the IRS approximately
$60,000. He went on to say, however, he could make the situation more "manageable." He
explained he could alter aspects of the audit so the IRS would accept $11,000 if the business
owners paid him $9,700 personally in return. A subsequent meeting was then scheduled for
May19, at which Coombs was to receive partial payment toward the bribe.

Prior to that meeting, the business owners reported Coombs's actions to authorities.
Therefore, on May 19, investigators were present to see Coombs accept $3,000 in payment
toward the bribe. After receiving the money, Coombs informed the business owner he had taken
care of things at the IRS. The two men then arranged yet another meeting, scheduled for June 2,
for payment of the balance of the bribe. On June 2, 2010, after Coombs received the final
payment of $6,700, he was arrested without incident.

In addition to the FBI, this case was investigated by the U.S. Treasury Inspector General-
Tax Administration. It was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Tracy L. Perzel and Joe
Dixon.

Read more at minneapolis.fbi.gov
 

Genocídio ateu

Amplify’d from www.criacionismo.com.br
O cartaz acima é uma paródia da campanha que os ateus militantes (aqueles que deixam constrangidos os ateus sensatos) tentaram promover em algumas capitais brasileiras. O cartaz acima não foi afixado em ônibus, como o pessoal da Atea (Associação Brasileira de Ateus e Agnósticos) queria afixar os deles. O cartaz acima é uma amostra da mesma associação injusta feita por certos ateus que tomam a parte pelo todo e julgam todos os cristãos por erros cometidos por alguns.



Leia também: "E Deus com isso?"
Read more at www.criacionismo.com.br
 

U.S. Trying to Build Conspiracy Case Against WikiLeaks’ Assange

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

U.S. Trying to Build Conspiracy Case Against WikiLeaks’ Assange

U.S. federal prosecutors are looking for evidence that would help them bring conspiracy charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, according to the New York Times.


Prosecutors are looking for anything that would suggest Assange encouraged or helped Manning leak classified information by giving him instructions on how to download files or requesting that Manning obtain certain kinds of documents to send to WikiLeaks.


As Threat Level reported earlier this week, a conspiracy charge for helping steal classified documents would help prosecutors avoid First Amendment issues that would arise if they tried to prosecute Assange under the Espionage Act.


The Times doesn’t cite any sources but says to make a conspiracy case, prosecutors have been sifting through online chat logs of Manning’s discussions with former hacker Adrian Lamo. In those, he confessed to leaking classified material to WikiLeaks and of having a unique relationship with Assange that went beyond what other sources might have with the enigmatic leader of the secret-spilling site.


Their investigation has also included border searches of laptops and cellphones of people connected tangentially to Manning or WikiLeaks.


Manning is charged under the Espionage Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the federal anti-hacking statute that prohibits unauthorized computer access or access that exceeds authorization.


If prosecutors were to charge Assange for publishing classified documents under the Espionage Act, it would be a political landmine since it would open traditional media outlets, such as The New York Times, to similar prosecutions for publishing classified information, a quagmire the Justice Department likely wants to avoid.


But charging Assange with conspiracy under the CFAA instead would help them avoid the constitutional issues. While journalists have generally been protected from prosecution for publishing classified documents, encouraging a source to obtain documents in a manner known to be illegal is not protected.


According to the Times, prosecutors have been scouring one of Manning’s chats with Lamo in which he described being in direct communication with Assange using an encrypted service and having a special relationship with him. Manning told Lamo in the chats that Assange at one point offered him a position at WikiLeaks. Manning said he wasn’t “interested right now” in a position with WikiLeaks because he had “too much excess baggage” that he was trying to work through.


Prosecutors are also looking at claims Manning made that Assange provided him with a special FTP address to upload classified documents so that his submissions would go to the top of the queue for review by WikiLeaks.


The Times points out that Threat Level has published excerpts from the logs of Manning’s chats with Lamo, but wrongly states that the parts in which Manning discusses his contact with Assange and the FTP server were not among those excerpts. In the excerpt below, published last June, Manning discusses the FTP server:


(02:48:52 PM) Lamo: How long between the leak and the publication?

(02:49:18 PM) Manning: some time in february

(02:49:25 PM) Manning: it was uploaded

(02:50:04 PM) Lamo: uploaded where? how would i transmit something if i had similarly damning data

(02:51:49 PM) Manning: uhm… preferably openssl the file with aes-256… then use sftp at prearranged drop ip addresses

(02:52:08 PM) Manning: keeping the key separate… and uploading via a different means

(02:52:31 PM) Lamo: so i myself would be SOL w/o a way to prearrange

(02:54:33 PM) Manning: not necessarily… the HTTPS submission should suffice legally… though i’d use tor on top of it…

(02:54:43 PM) Manning: but you’re data is going to be watched

(02:54:44 PM) Manning: *your

(02:54:49 PM) Manning: by someone, more than likely

(02:54:53 PM) Lamo: submission where?

(02:55:07 PM) Manning: wl.org submission system

(02:55:23 PM) Lamo: in the massive queue?

(02:55:54 PM) Manning: lol, yeah, it IS pretty massive…

(02:55:56 PM) Manning: buried

(02:56:04 PM) Manning: i see what you mean

(02:56:35 PM) Manning: long term sources do get preference… i can see where the “unfairness” factor comes in

(02:56:53 PM) Lamo: how does that preference work?

(02:57:47 PM) Manning: veracity… the material is easy to verify…

(02:58:27 PM) Manning: because they know a little bit more about the source than a purely anonymous one

(02:59:04 PM) Manning: and confirmation publicly from earlier material, would make them more likely to publish… i guess…

(02:59:16 PM) Manning: im not saying they do… but i can see how that might develop

(03:00:18 PM) Manning: if two of the largest public relations “coups” have come from a single source… for instance

(03:02:03 PM) Manning: you yeah… purely *submitting* material is more likely to get overlooked without contacting them by other means and saying hey, check your submissions for x…


Manning also discussed his role as a source for WikiLeaks and indicated that he had developed a relationship with Assange:


(2:04:29 PM) Manning: im a source, not quite a volunteer

(2:05:38 PM) Manning: i mean, im a high profile source… and i’ve developed a relationship with assange… but i dont know much more than what he tells me, which is very little

(2:05:58 PM) Manning: it took me four months to confirm that the person i was communicating was in fact assange


See also:


Read more at www.wired.com