ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Real-Life UFOs, From Flying Flapjacks to Mystery Missiles

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

Real-Life UFOs, From Flying Flapjacks to Mystery Missiles

If you listen to the Air Force tell it, there are simply no such things as UFOs. A two-decade investigation called Project Blue Book determined in 1969 that no extraterrestial life has made contact with Earth. And no unexplained aerial phenomena have exceeded humanity's scientific grasp, let alone threatened national security.

That has not been enough for dedicated UFOlogists. In September, a group of Air Force missile officers contended that aliens had temporarily taken control of their nukes.

The "do they or don't they exist" debate won't be settled until someone from far away asks to be taken to our leaders. And the controversy makes it easy to forget that a UFO isn't actually a ship full of little green men. It's a placeholder for a puzzle the mind can't solve. So, it's also easy to forget that, much like the Insane Clown Posse observed about miracles, UFOs are all around us.

From weird drones to cheeky satellites to things that manifest themselves to the naked eye as little more than plumes of smoke, the skies can be a mysterious, congested place. Here, we take a look at the most striking curiosities of aviation, both foreign and domestic, including actual flying saucers.

That's the trouble with aliens: the misdirection. You spend too much time tracking down intergalactic visitors and you'll miss the oddities that humans invented for getting around our home planet.

Above: The Canuck Flying Saucer

The best engineering minds in two countries couldn't quite figure out how to make the Canuck Flying Saucer work. A joint venture in the 1950s between the U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force and the Canadian aviation company Avro, the VZ-9 Avrocar was supposed to be a "revolutionary" supersonic ship that brought extraterrestrial style to the military-industrial complex.

The 18-to-25-foot pancake was to lift off vertically, thanks to a five-foot fan in its belly. The "focusing ring" around its exterior would push air outward in the opposite direction its pilot wanted to fly. Manufacturers called it "Ground Effect Takeoff and Landing," or GETOL.

And it did pretty well if you only wanted to go five or six feet off the ground. Higher altitudes would cause the craft to pitch wildly, a flaw its engineers couldn't overcome. After about 10 years and as many million dollars, the military pulled the plug in 1960. But visitors to the Army's transportation museum at Fort Eustis, Virginia, check out the prototype and imagine what might have been.

Photo courtesy of Wikimedia
The (Tiny) Probe Droid You've Been Looking For

The (Tiny) Probe Droid You've Been Looking For

With its squat body and tendril-like stands drooping down, this mini-drone might have been inspired by the Probot spy droid used to find the Rebel Alliance on Hoth in The Empire Strikes Back. It has a similar function: Honeywell's T-Hawk, made for the Army is a hovering clunker used for reconnaissance missions.

Snapping imagery from more than 7,000 feet in the air, the T-Hawk is designed to give soldiers a view of the dangers ahead of them if they don't have the runway space to launch a full-sized drone. Weighing just 17 pounds, the T-Hawk is small enough to fit in a backpack, and its ducted fan launches it straight into the sky.

Alas, it's not as autonomous as the Probot, since soldiers below need to tell the T-Hawk where to go with a joystick-based remote-control system. But it's been used in Iraq, where thirsty soldiers dubbed it the Flying Beer Can, and seems not to have suffered for its inadequacies relative to the Galactic Empire model. Indeed, Honeywell says it's building a "much larger" T-Hawk for the Army that'll be ready for tests in 2012, as well as a version for police anti-drug missions. Even if you're hiding on an ice planet, it'll find you.

Photo: U.S. Navy
The Spy Plane That Started Area 51

The Spy Plane That Started Area 51

In 1997, a study in the CIA's Studies in Intelligence journal concluded that "manned reconnaissance" flights account for "over half of all UFO reports from the late 1950s through the 1960s." That figure is disputed in the UFO-studying community. But what's beyond argument is that the U-2, the mother of all U.S. Air Force spy planes, played a seminal role in UFOlogy.

Introduced in the 1950s, the U-2 is loaded with sensors and cameras to snap pictures and scarf up enemy signals from 70,000 feet in the air. It took the photos of Russian missiles in Cuba that nearly touched off a nuclear war in 1962, and it's still in use over Afghanistan today.

It's so synonymous with secrets that it was developed at what would come to be known as Area 51 in Nevada. In fact, no U-2, no Area 51: The facility opened because in 1955 Lockheed's secret-plane builders wanted somewhere to experiment on their U-2 away from prying eyes. Had they chosen somewhere outside the Nevada desert, a cultural touchstone might never have developed.

One of Area 51's founders was Clarence "Kelly" Johnson, a Lockheed honcho who built the facility near Groom Lake, Nevada, at the CIA's behest. Ironically, Johnson was no UFO skeptic. He's quoted as saying in 1948: "I should state that for at least five years, I have definitely believed in the possibility that flying saucers exist — this in spite of a good deal of kidding from my technical associates." By giving the U-2 a home, he made believers out of millions more.

Photo: U.S. Air Force
Chinese Mystery Anti-Ballistic Missile

Chinese Mystery Anti-Ballistic Missile

On its own, China's test of an anti-ballistic missile in January probably wouldn't have caused a stir, if not for two additional factors. First, it came right after the U.S. sold Patriot air-defense missiles to Taiwan, so Washington took it as payback. Second, no one knows exactly what kind of missile the Chinese launched.

State news agency Xinhua released the above photo, but that didn't help. Our friend Jeffrey Lewis thought China's mystery missile was a cousin of Russia's S-300 air-defense system at first, but he ended up unsure.

Some Chinese citizens, perhaps unaccustomed to their nation's first missile-defense test, looked for a less earthly explanation. After seeing a "white circular structure about the size of dozens of moons" on the day of the launch, a worker at the Jiuquan space center in Gansu conclued, "it may be an alien voyager from another planet."

His was one of several claimed UFO sightings in China during the test, a testament to the imagination's ability to fill a vacuum in explainable phenomena. Then again, Beijing never actually denied that its obscure missile is based on alien technology.

Photo: Xinhua
The Navy Can't Resist an Otherworldly Satellite Pun

The Navy Can't Resist an Otherworldly Satellite Pun

If you build satellites for a living, you've got to spend part of your time designing programs whose acronyms abbreviate to spaced-based puns.

Boeing employees sure did. The Navy uses a series of high-frequency satellites to keep its ships and mariners talking to each other. In the 1990s, it hired Boeing to give them an upgrade. That led to 601 pieces of cheekily named space junk. Since the original satellites were known as Ultra High Frequency, Boeing dubbed its revamps the UHF Follow-On. Get it?

Better yet, Boeing's $1.7 billion UFO satellites inspired a Navy unit patch that couldn't help but overexplain the joke.

Image: Boeing
Spy Blimps the Size of Football Fields

Spy Blimps the Size of Football Fields

Anything larger and you'd have the S.H.I.E.L.D. Helicarrier. In June, Northrop Grumman got a $517 million contract from the Army to build three enormous airships as floating intelligence centers. The Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle is supposed to carry 2,500 pounds worth of "sensors, antennas, data links and signals intelligence equipment" to Hoover up information beneath its corpulent husk.

With a payload like that, it's a good thing the blimp will be the size of a football field and seven stories tall. Not quite Hindenberg-sized, but that blimp didn't exactly end well.

Why does the Army need something like that? It would be the first air asset in its arsenal that can remain at 20,000 feet for up to 21 days. One Army official judges it would take 12 Reaper drones to do an equivalent amount of spying.

Its first destination: Afghanistan, next summer, where eagle-eyed locals might be forgiven for thinking they're seeing an alien mothership.

Image: Northrop Grumman
The Month-Long Flight of the Voltron Drone

Month-Long Flight of the Voltron Drone

What could be more UFO-like than a flying robot that can spend a solid five years up in the air? That's what Darpa, the Pentagon's out-there research branch, is trying to pull off with its "Project Vulture." That's a long way away, so Darpa is taking it slow — one month at a time.

The challenge of keeping an unmanned aircraft aloft for a month — well, and the $155 million contract at stake — got the aerospace industry working overtime. Aurora Aerospace, one of the bidders, submitted this design, dubbed "Odysseus." It's three 160-foot drones in one that would meet in flight and interlock like Voltron.

Powered largely by sunlight during the day, Odysseus would latch into the Z-formation pictured here to maximize light absorption through its solar panels. At night, it'd flatten out to make more efficient use of its collected energy.

This fall, Darpa opted against Odysseus and went with Boeing's similarly-solar-powered SolarEagle, a design only slightly less crazy. The SolarEagle is a thin, white drone with a 400-foot wingspan — the David Bowie of unmanned planes — with four long fingers to carry a payload instead of a traditional fuselage. Boeing's got till 2014 to keep the SolarEagle aloft for a month at 65,000 feet, about three times as high as most drones.

Image: Aurora
Air Force Alienlike Stealth Plane

Air Force Alienlike Stealth Plane

Over 100 feet long with a 56-foot wingspan, the Air Force's old unseen fighter, the triangle-shaped F-117 Nighthawk, looks like it came from outer space. The Air Force didn't even acknowledge having it until 1988, seven years after its first flight. And true to the mystery surrounding it, it was born in the Nevada sands near Area 51.

Like a lot of top-secret airplanes, starting with the U-2, the Air Force spent the F-117's test cycle near Groom Lake, right by the restricted-access base synonymous with paranormal activity. With the government not acknowledging the Nighthawk's existence in the 1980s came a rise in "triangular" UFO sightings. Even now, two years after the Pentagon announced it would stop production of the F-117, debate rages among UFOlogists about whether a curious shape in the sky is a Nighthawk or something more extraterrestrial. Kind of gives a new meaning to "stealth."

Photo: U.S. Air Force

In Russia, UFO Flies You!

What's a UFO if it isn't green? The EKIP ("Ecology and Progress") was a Russian cargo-and-passenger aircraft that didn't need an airstrip to take off or land, thanks to its hovercraft-like jet-air cushions. Strong thing, too: The amphibious EKIP carried 100 or more tons during intercontinental flight — up in the sky or just above the sea surface.

The Navy was so enamored of it earlier this decade that it offered to help develop the EKIP, offering a Maryland location up for tests. Even despite the post-Cold War cooperation that the EKIP represents, the hovercraft suffers from a lack of funding, but its engineers still want to keep the flying-saucer-looking craft aloft.

Photo: EKIP-aviation-concern.com

Russian Missile Failure Lights Up Norwegian Martian Hunters

Don't ask Russia about its disappointing Bulava missile launch last year. What started as an attempt at testing out a ballistic missile from the White Sea became a seminal moment for Scandinavian space-watchers.

The Russians have had bad luck with their experimental submarine-launched nuke-ready missile: Seven out of its 12 tests have been failures. But last December's test lives in infamy. The missile let off a spiral of white and blue light, freaking out residents of the Norwegian city of Tromso. Fish-factory worker Jan Petter Jorgensen captured the spiraling flash on camera in the pitch black. "I could not believe my eyes, and got the shivers and was quite shaken by it," he reflected after his footage caused an international sci-fi stir.

Soon after, the Russian Defense Ministry manned up and said the flashing lights were due to the Bulava's motor spinning out of control. But our own GeekDad had the far more industrious idea that the sky-spiral was intended to promote ABC's V reboot. If only the show itself was as interesting.

Photo: Globalsecurity.org
Naval Aviation Gets Flapjacked

Naval Aviation Gets Flapjacked

Charles H. Zimmerman was a can-do guy. An engineer for a precursor of NASA, in the 1930s, he figured he could increase a plane's efficiency by making it mostly wing. That was the origin story of one of the odder designs in the history of naval aviation: the Vought-173 "Flying Flapjack," basically a flying saucer with two big propellers, sending airflow over the wings even when the Flapjack slowed. Conventional fixed-wing aircraft couldn't do that, and struggled to maintain altitude at slow speeds. But its sleek design made it "a sure bet to lead the field in the race to smash the supersonic barrier," marveled Modern Mechanix in a 1947 cover story.

It wasn't to be. While the Navy commissioned a a prototype in the late '30s, it decided to go with jet aircraft during the Second World War, and the same year Modern Mechanix put the Flapjack on its cover, the Navy pulled the plug. Still, it wasn't all a failure: The Vought-173 ultimately climbed to 5,000 feet, despite its funny-looking fuselage, and earned the respect of Charles Lindbergh, who even flew it once.

Photo courtesy of Wikimedia
Inside-Out Helicopter Platform

Inside-Out Helicopter Platform

Zimmerman didn't just dream up the Flying Flapjack. In the 1950s, he had an idea he thought would revolutionize aeronautics: Put a helicopter's rotors underneath the pilot. Easy enough to generate lift, and the shifts of the pilot's weight could guide the unusual conveyance in the desired direction. The Office of Naval Research and the Army figured: Why not?

By the middle of the decade, a New York helicopter company called de Lackner designed what became known as the HZ-1 Aerocycle or HZ-1 Flying Platform. Powered by a 30-kilowatt motor, two 15-foot rotor blades spun in opposite directions beneath the platform, with four pods (later skis) at the platform's extremities for balance.

The Army, improbably, ordered 15 Aerocycles from de Lackner, perhaps taken by the thought of an inverted personal-use helicopter that could drop soldiers into a fight at speeds of 65 milers per hour.

Ultimately, the Aerocycle couldn't even convince its test pilot. "It only took me one flight to realize that a non-flyer would have considerable difficulty operating it," remarked Captain Selmer Sundby, though he went on to several accident-prone flights in it.

Photo: Vectorsite.net

Modern-Day Flying Saucer

S, it may be the case that flying saucers basically failed over the years, be it the Avrocar or the Flying Pancake. That didn't discourage a British inventor named Geoff Hatton.

To get his small hovering drone into the sky, Hatton used a physical occurrence called the Coanda Effect, in which air is attracted to a curved surface and can be pushed down for a lift effect. Smaller than a meter in diameter, Hatton's saucers are operated through remote controls and buzz like an insect. He put together a company called GFS Projects -- Geoff's Flying Saucers -- and won a research contract with the U.S. Army.

That didn't stop GFS from running into financial trouble, and last year a different British aviation company, Aesir, acquired Hatton's work. Aesir seems to be continuing the effort -- a shot in the arm for those who grew up thinking flying saucers were cool and figuring they'd model their own designs off (presumed) alien technology.

Photo: Laesieworks.com
See Also:
Read more at www.wired.com
 

Big Brotheresque App Kills Your Automotive Anonymity

Amplify’d from www.wired.com

Big Brotheresque App Kills Your Automotive Anonymity

A new app that lets frustrated drivers vent their anger at boneheaded motorists already has branded your bumper with a “How’s My Driving” sticker, and it could raise your insurance premium. It’s like having thousands of unmarked police cars and speed cameras on every roadway, and it could spell the end of anonymity behind the wheel.

DriveMeCrazy, developed by Shazam co-founder Philip Inghelbrecht, is a voice-activated app that encourages drivers to report bad behavior by reciting the offender’s license plate into a smartphone. The poor sap gets “flagged” and receives a virtual “ticket,” which may not sound like much until you realize all the information — along with date, time and location of the “offense” — is sent to the DMV and insurance companies.

Anyone can write a ticket, even pedestrians and cyclists. No one is safe from being tattled on. Even if you don’t use the program, which went live Wednesday, you can’t opt out of being flagged if someone thinks you’re driving like a schmuck. Inghelbrecht is emphatic in saying he sees no privacy issues with the app and insists the end of road-going anonymity can only improve safety.

“People think they can do bad things on the road because they think they can get away with it,” he said. “I believe that driving is one of the most public acts that you could ever do. One small mistake can impact the lives of those around you.”

Inghelbrecht compares DriveMeCrazy to government programs that encourage reporting drunk drivers or gross polluters. If drivers know they’re being watched by smartphone-wielding vigilantes, Inghelbrecht figures they will refrain from aggressive behavior for fear of getting flagged. His goal is to cut the number of motor vehicle accidents 1 or 2 percent by 2020, a figure that would represent 700 lives saved annually.

“That would be the most beautiful outcome, commercial aspects aside,” he said.

Those commercial aspects could be huge.

“The ability for monetization is actually really strong,” he said. “I don’t want to get into too much detail, but essentially if people report driving behavior of their fellow motorists, you’re building a database of driver information.”

It’s like vehicle-history reports, but with thousands of reports on the behavior of individual drivers. “That’s obviously interesting to the insurance companies, who are truly information starved,” he said.

Insurance companies rely on buying your driving record from your state’s motor-vehicle bureau, and they use predictive proxy data such as marital status, homeownership and ZIP code to determine your risk. Inghelbrecht sees insurance companies having great interest in a driver-behavior database that, if predictive of claims data, could help set rates.

Already, Inghelbrecht is looking at putting together a pilot program with insurance companies, though the industry’s interest — and how much driver-reported data regulators might allow them to use — is uncertain. Nationwide Insurance offered an opinion in an e-mail to Wired.com.

“Auto-insurance rates are filed with state regulators and must include consistent definitions for the activities that will vary costs for consumers,” the company said. “Because each individual who would observe another driver’s performance would have a unique perspective about what might be safe behaviors, it would be difficult to use information reported by the general public.”

Not quite a ringing endorsement, but Inghelbrecht isn’t worried.

“Our data is never as official or authoritative as a police report,” he said. So how can he assure accuracy? Volume.

“The reality is that the police only capture about 35 million moving violations, of which 10 million make it to the DMV,” he said. “For us to get 10 million flags on vehicles isn’t exactly a stretch.”

That’s 10 million pieces of information about motorists sent in by their fellow motorists. Of course, the wisdom of the crowd may not hold up under the scrutiny of state regulators or insurance companies’ internal standards.

There are no limitations on reasons for flagging. Pass on a double-yellow line in a school zone? Flagged. Not driving fast enough for the 16-year-old hoon tailgating you? Flagged. Didn’t see that jaywalking pedestrian wearing a dark coat at night? Flagged. Got a bumpersticker that offends someone? You guessed it. Flagged.

“There’s going to be noise in the data,” Inghelbrecht conceded.

Still, the company is developing algorithms that sort out malicious flags from relevant data. For each flag, he said, “we capture the day, the time, the location, obviously the license plate and the unique device identifier on [a flagger's] iPhone. You can quickly detect malicious use.” Safeguards ensure that multiple flags of the same driver from the same user are ignored, and mistakenly entered plates are matched with other location data.

If that doesn’t work, drivers will soon be able to leave feedback for informants, er, flaggers, which is currently the only official appeal that a flagged driver will have.

Inghelbrecht says someday his crowdsourced driver-behavior database may be worth more than relatively incomplete DMV records, much the same way that online review sites like TripAdvisor and Yelp have gained in popularity over Michelin guides.

“If I had told you 10 years ago you can choose between Michelin or reviews by people who visited the restaurant, you and me and everyone else would’ve said Michelin,” he said.

It isn’t all negative. Drivers can also report someone who is driving safely or even flirt with other drivers who have DriveMeCrazy profiles set up, but we imagine that cutie in the 3-Series convertible won’t be nearly as interested in you as your insurance company.

Photo of rush hour in Boston: Josh Michtom / Flickr. Screenshots: DriveMeCrazy
See more at www.wired.com
 

A Cumberland County Man Accused In Sexual Assault Of Young Girls

Amplify’d from www.wgal.com

Man Accused In Sexual Assault Of Young Girls

32-Year-Old In Prison On Rape Charges

PERRY COUNTY, Pa. -- A Cumberland County man is in Perry County Prison on rape charges.

Mark Permenter, 32, of Camp Hill, sexually assaulted two 3-year-old girls and a 4-year-old girl between September and November in Oliver Township, state police said.

Bail for Permenter is set at $150,000.

Copyright 2010 by WGAL.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Read more at www.wgal.com
 

WORLD DAY OF PEACE: "RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. THE PATH TO PEACE"

Amplify’d from visnews-en.blogspot.com
VATICAN CITY, 16 DEC 2010 (VIS) - In the Holy See Press Office at midday today, a press conference was held to present the Pope's Message for the forty-fourth World Day of Peace. The Day falls on 1 January 2011 and has as its theme: "Religious Freedom. The Path to Peace".



  Participating in today's press conference were Cardinal Peter Kodwo Appiah Turkson, Bishop Mario Toso, S.D.B., Msgr. Anthony Frontiero and Tommaso De Ruzza, respectively president, secretary and officials of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.



  Cardinal Turkson, speaking English, explained how this year's Message is made up of "an introductory reference to the attack on Christians in Iraq, the main body of the text which presents the meaning of religious freedom and the various ways in which it fashions peace and experiences of peace, and a concluding reflection on peace as a gift of God and as the work of men and women of goodwill, especially of believers.



  "Religious freedom", he added, "is the theme of the Pope's Message for the World Day of Peace not only because that subject matter is central to Catholic social doctrine, but also because the experience of religious freedom - a basic vocation of man and a fundamental, inalienable and universal human right, and key to peace - has come under great stress and threat: From raging secularism, which is intolerant of God and of any form of expression of religion. From religious fundamentalism, the politicisation of religion and the establishment of State religions. From the growing cultural and religious pluralism that is becoming ever more present and pressing in our day".



  "The Holy Father", the cardinal said, "sees the safeguarding of religious freedom in our multi-cultural, multi-religious and secularised world as one of the ways to safeguard peace".



  "One of the important tasks that our world set for itself following World War II was the formulation, adoption and promulgation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights", said the president of the pontifical council. Benedict XVI, he said, "is also worried about the increasing instances of the denial of the universality of these rights in the name of different cultural, political, social and even religious outlooks".



  "Religious freedom is not a right granted by a State", it "is derived, ... from natural law and from the dignity of the person, which are rooted in creation. Rather, the State and other public institutions, ... need to recognise it as intrinsic to the human person, as indispensable for integrity and peace".



  Cardinal Turkson went on: "Religious freedom is a duty of public authority" but "it is not an unlimited right. ... Religious freedom refers primarily to man's freedom to express his being 'capax Dei': his freedom to respond to the truth of his nature as created by God and created for life with God without coercion or impediments. It is in this that man finds his peace, and from there becomes an instrument of peace".



  "Religious freedom does not imply that all religions are equal. Nor is it a reason for religious relativism or indifferentism. Religious freedom is compatible with defence of one's religious identity against relativism, syncretism and fundamentalism, which are all abused forms of religious freedom".



  After then highlighting how "religious freedom is not limited to the free exercise of worship", the cardinal pointed out that "there is a public dimension to it, which grants believers the chance of making their contribution to building the social order".



  "Denying the right to profess one's religion in public and the right to bring the truth of faith to bear upon public life has negative consequences for true development", he said.



  "The exercise of the right of religious freedom as a way to peace thus implies the recognition of the harmony that must exist between the two areas and forms of life: private and public, individual and community, person and society. ... Accordingly, the development and the exercise of one's religious freedom, is also the task of one's community".



  Referring then to the relationship between religious freedom and the State, Cardinal Turkson affirmed that, "although religious freedom is not established by the State, it (the State) nevertheless needs to recognise it as intrinsic to the human person and his public and communitarian expressions. Recognition of religious freedom and respect for the innate dignity of every person also imply the principle of the responsibility to protect on the part of the community, society and the State".



  "The Church's appeals for religious freedom are not based on a claim of reciprocity, whereby one group respects the rights of others only if the latter respect their rights. Rather, appeals for religious freedom are based on the dignity of persons. We respect the rights of others because it is the right thing to do, not in exchange for its equivalent or for a favour granted. At the same time, when others suffer persecution because of their faith and religious practice, we offer them compassion and solidarity".



  Cardinal Turkson concluded his observations by noting that "all proclamation of the Gospel ... is an effort to awaken the (religious) freedom of man to desire and to embrace the truth of the Gospel. This truth of the Gospel, however, is unique, because it is truth that saves. ... Evangelisation and the carrying out of the missionary charge, then, do not contradict and oppose the sense of religious freedom".



  For his part, Bishop Toso affirmed that Benedict XVI's Message "invites us particularly to examine the truth of the right to religious freedom; in other words, its anthropological, ethical, juridical, political, civil and religious implications. ... Over and above mere tolerance, religious freedom is the marrow bone of all morality and freedom, of reciprocal respect, of peace".



  "The Message reserves the same criticism for fanaticism, fundamentalism and laicism, because they all overlook the essence of religious freedom, which is the free and common search for transcendent truth".



  "For the Church", the bishop concluded, "dialogue between followers of different religions is an important stimulus to collaborate with all religious communities for the promotion of peace. In this way - in a globalised world characterised by increasingly multi-ethnic and multi-confessional societies - the great religions can represent not a problem but a resource, an important factor of unity and harmony".



  To read the text of the Holy Father's Message click here.

AC/                                    VIS 20101216 (1070)
Read more at visnews-en.blogspot.com
 

These Are They 144,000: God's Will For Me Video: Paul Godfrey - He Spake And It Was Done

Have you ever wonder how to have all your prayers answered?

Have you ever wonder how you can have your prayers answered before you even ask?



For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. Then shall ye call upon me, and ye shall go and pray unto me, and I will hearken unto you. And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart. And I will be found of you, saith the LORD. Jer 29:11-14



Paul Godfrey - He Spake And It Was Done http://vimeo.com/17254319


US Concerned about Terror Attacks During Holidays

Amplify’d from www.newsmax.com

US Concerned about Terror Attacks During Holidays


WASHINGTON — Counterterrorism officials are warning about threats to the U.S. from al-Qaida and affiliated groups during this holiday season.


The FBI and Homeland Security Department are alerting state and local law enforcement to be wary of suspicious behavior and to regularly change security measures to interfere with any terrorist plans. The warning, sent in a bulletin obtained by The Associated Press, does not include information about specific plots.


A spate of attempted attacks against the U.S. in the past year — particularly the Nigerian man charged with trying to take down an airplane last Christmas — has officials on high alert.


Captured insurgents in Iraq claim al-Qaida is planning attacks in the U.S. and Europe during the holiday season.

Read more at www.newsmax.com
 

Irish Investigators: Vatican Protected Rapist


Irish Investigators: Vatican Protected Rapist

This article comes from the Irish Times.
Scale of Walsh cover-up by church breathtaking



Mary Raftery





THE SCALE of the cover-up by the Catholic Church of the crimes of Fr Tony Walsh, as finally revealed in chapter 19 of the Murphy report, is breathtaking. It is more extensive than any other single case dealt with in the main body of the report.



Archbishops, bishops, chancellors, vicars general, parish priests – the list of senior clerics who knew of Walsh’s serial sexual abuse of children is virtually endless. From the very first complaints brought to the archdiocese, a bare two days after Walsh’s ordination in 1978, and for the succeeding 17 years, these pillars of the church sat on their detailed knowledge of Walsh’s abominable predations on children, shielding him from the law, deliberately deciding to keep his crimes hidden from the civil authorities. In the course of those 17 years, until the archdiocese finally decided in 1995 to co-operate with Garda investigations, Walsh abused well over 100 children according to the chapter published yesterday. Here we find out that archbishops Dermot Ryan, Kevin McNamara and Desmond Connell all had detailed knowledge of Walsh’s criminal activities.



Chapter 19 is full of references to discussions about Walsh at the monthly meetings of the Dublin bishops – during the years in question, they include auxiliary bishops Donal Murray, Dermot O’Mahony, James Kavanagh and Eamonn Walsh, together with Brendan Comiskey, Laurence Forristal, James Moriarty, Joseph Carroll, Patrick Dunne and Desmond Williams.

Of these, most are retired or deceased. bishops Murray and Moriarty resigned on foot of the publication of the substantive Murphy report last year. In fact, the only one still in office is Bishop Eamonn Walsh.



He and fellow auxiliary Ray Field famously tendered their resignations – with great reluctance – on Christmas Eve 2009. It emerged several months later the Vatican had refused to accept them and the two bishops remain in situ.



Bishop Walsh defended himself last December by claiming that “as far back as 1990, I wasn’t a month in the job as a bishop, and I stood up at a meeting and I said that not alone should the police, who were already informed about an individual, but we should say where he was living and the number of his car, because I felt he was a danger”.



That individual was Tony Walsh and this incident does indeed appear in chapter 19 of the Murphy report, where it is described as “the first time that the possibility of reporting to the gardaí was raised”. The suggestion was shot down by the archdiocese’s leading canon lawyer at the time, Msgr Gerard Sheehy, who described it as “an outrageous suggestion”. Also present at that meeting were archbishop Connell and bishops Kavanagh, O’Mahony and Murray.



Two key points emerge: first, that Bishop Eamonn Walsh (a trained barrister, incidentally) was sufficiently well-aware of the criminal nature of Walsh’s activities to know that he should be reported to the Garda; and second, that Bishop Walsh did not report him, and nor of course did any of his fellow bishops. It consequently shows an extraordinary detachment from reality for Bishop Walsh to have claimed last year that merely suggesting that gardaí be informed of crimes committed in some way excuses or exonerates him from responsibility for his part in the culture of cover-up in the Dublin archdiocese. The only other serving bishop involved in the Walsh case is John McAreavey of Dromore. While still a priest, he was one of the judges who sat on the internal tribunal in 1992 which decided to laicise Walsh.



Neither he nor his fellow judge, the now retired bishop of Killaloe Willie Walsh, saw fit to report to gardaí their knowledge of the crimes of Walsh.



Although Bishop McAreavey is not specifically named or criticised in chapter 19, it will be interesting to see if he can continue to maintain his stony silence on the matter.



And what are we to make of another senior cleric’s matter-of-fact reporting that he “evaded” questions from a garda? This was the chancellor or chief administrator of the archdiocese, Msgr Alex Stenson, recording his conversation with a garda about Walsh in 1991. A parent had contacted the garda, concerned about Walsh but with no hard evidence of a crime committed. Msgr Stenson had heard that the garda was asking around and rang him to find out how much he knew. In the course of the conversation, the garda asked Msgr Stenson if Walsh had a past record. “I evaded that,” recorded Msgr Stenson in his 1991 memo.



The chancellor’s evasion meant that the Garda Síochána remained in the dark about Walsh and his crimes. There is at the very least an argument to be made that this amounts to an obstruction of justice.



After all, who knows better than a cleric that a sin of omission is every bit as serious as one of commission? And lying (by omission) to the police should rank high on anyone’s scale of wrongdoing, even more so where the safety of children is concerned.



The gardaí themselves also stand condemned in chapter 19 for their failure to pursue investigations of Walsh in 1991 and 1992 on foot of concerns expressed by parents about contact between the priest and their children. In their defence, the Murphy report points out that there was no specific evidence of crime brought to their attention at this stage, and further that the archdiocese did not share any of its extensive information on Walsh.



Nonetheless, it is profoundly disturbing to read, for instance, that Msgr Stenson records in 1991 that a garda “assured me that there was ‘no question of prosecution’ ”. This same garda gave evidence at the internal church tribunal hearings on the laicisation of Walsh, and had dealings with the then Fr Willie Walsh (later of course bishop of Killaloe), when he arrived at Whitehall Garda station “stating that he had been appointed to carry out an internal investigation into the paedophile activities of Fr [Walsh]”.



It is clear that the Garda should now extend its own internal inquiries to include the Walsh case among the others unearthed by the Murphy commission where Garda investigations into clerical child abuse were inadequate. The results of these inquiries should be published in full.



It is vital for public confidence in the force that its past failures in this area be thoroughly exposed, and that rigorous procedures be in place to detect and guard against shielding either institutions or individuals from the full force of the law.
Read more at thevaticanlobby.blogspot.com
 

Narnia: Magic for Adventists

Amplify’d from www.spectrummagazine.org

Narnia: Magic for Adventists

by Jared Wright
DawnTreader.jpg

When I was a kid in youth group, our Sabbath School teacher showed us segments from the DreamWorks screen adaptation of C.S. Lewis's "The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe." One girl, the pastor's daughter, as I recall, refused to watch the clips on the basis that Narnia's magic was evil. No, she hadn't seen it. No, she hadn't read Lewis's other writings, including "Mere Christianity." She knew all she needed to know. Witches and dwarves and fauns were satanic, plain and simple.

That episode is emblematic of Adventists' relationship with magic. It creeps many of us out. Like many other conservative Christian denominations, we stay the heck away from it. An Adventist even wrote the book, literally, on the evils of Harry Potter and why children and parents must avoid that series. (This was going to be a review of Deathly Hallows Part 1, which is in theaters now, but I decided the inevitable fight over witchcraft wasn't worth it.)

Some time ago, we ceded magic to the devil. Some quotation(s) from Ellen White, some Mission Spotlight story, some anecdote about a ouja board firmed in our minds the belief that we're entering the devil's playground when we enter the realm of magic (and undoubtedly readers will want to point to still more evidence to make the case against magic in the comment section below).

Our problem really is that we have never been taught how to read. I don't mean how to sound out the phonetic pronunciation of words on a page, I mean how to appreciate and value literature. We Adventists are not very good at understanding rhetorical and literary devices, regrettably. C.S. Lewis's imaginative corpus of fiction and prose has been around long enough that most of us have figured out his stories are largely allegorical, with fairly transparent moral systems. Even so, a troubling number of us still get queasy at Lewis's use of magic in his writings.

We should get over it. Jesus used untrue (and Adventists might even argue theologically incorrect) stories to make points about the kingdom of heaven. The story of the rich man and Lazarus, in which a character who is in hell speaks to the living to give warning, comes to mind.

Whether in Rowling's Potter series or Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia, magic is part of the literary world the characters inhabit. When we enter their world, we are invited to suspend our this-worldly hang-ups over fantastical creatures and enchantments, and go deeper than the superficial fears that if we read about spells we'll inadvertently be drawn into real-life witchcraft or some such thing. The rich textures of imagined realms often help us better understand the complexities of our own world if we let them. Or as a pastor friend of mine once put it in a sermon referencing Lewis's Space Trilogy, C.S. Lewis's fiction is often more true than most people's "non-fiction."

So during this holiday season, see The Voyage of the Dawn Treader if you have the chance. This third cinematic release of the Narnia series will carry you into a world of spiritually-laden adventure and enchantment, whose spiritual overtones have been made even more obvious for the nervous among us. There's no mistaking the Christian themes in the film. Or if you're feeling very courageous, see Deathly Hallows Part 1, which is also playing. Its author is also avowedly Christian, and the themes (for those who make it beyond the witchcraft and wizardry) are distinctly, if more subtly, Christian as well.

Take the family to see the films. Let these works of creative storytelling spark conversation about imagination and literature and magic and Good and Evil. Because C.S. Lewis (and J.K. Rowling, for that matter) wove unmissable Great Controversy motifs into his (and her) works.

Better yet, read the books. Unless you're eight years old or younger you may have less appreciation for Fox Searchlight's version of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, which came across at times as a clumsy, CG-heavy cacophony of visual noise, lacking fully-formed characters. (There, that's my review of the film). The book, on the other hand, is a warm, witty and layered foray back into Narnia, for those who have been there before.

However you enjoy these stories, let there be no apologies for venturing into the worlds of literary magic. Aslan (and other wonderful, magical characters) waits for you there!

Read more at www.spectrummagazine.org