ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Catholic Socialism: Briefly Defined


Catholic Socialism: Briefly Defined

INTRODUCTION



Once upon a time, a faithful reader of The Vatican Lobby requested that I explain what I meant by "Catholic socialism." He felt that putting these words together was oxymoronic, and he assured me that the Roman Catholic church expressly condemned socialism. Many Catholics believe this way, mainly because the church has said so numerous times.



Clever wordplay, however, easily obscures the truth.



Socialism, as the word is commonly used today, implies some belief in a "community of goods." It traditionally refers (especially in America) to Soviet-style Communism founded upon the atheistic thought of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Stalin. The Catholic church has indeed spoken out against this ideology for more than a century, rightly condemning its godless and backward reasoning as destructive to humanity. However, the church's opposition to atheistic Communism by no means precludes it from endorsing "Catholic social teaching" or what I like to call Catholic socialism.



This unique ideology was born in an encyclical drafted by Pope Leo XIII in 1891, Rerum Novarum ("On New Things"). In this document, which was distributed to bishops and congregations all over the world, Leo XIII addressed the condition of exploited workers and challenged the atheistic social model that was then sweeping across Europe with a social model of his own.



Rerum Novarum was immensely influential. It provided opponents of Marxism with a fully thought-out system for organizing social and economic relations under a Christian regime. It marked the beginning of the so-called social gospel--that is, a move away from spreading only the news of "Jesus Christ and him crucified" to spreading the news of a Christian-esque political system--leading to the formation of the mighty Christian Democrat parties of Europe. In the end, Leo's encyclical expanded Christianity from being merely a spiritual message with a limited role in secular society to being a social system equipped to regulate all aspects of human existence. Several likeminded encyclicals appeared over the next hundred years, reaffirming and clarifying Leo XIII original vision. Together, these "social encyclicals" comprise the official body of Catholic social teaching.



TENETS



So what is this teaching all about?



Below I have listed and briefly described a few main tenets that more or less make up the doctrines of Catholic socialism:



Human Dignity



The Catholic church believes that each person is unique and possessed of a soul that intrinsically matters in the overall scheme of things. Of course, it is difficult to deny the truth of this statement or to resist it in any way. All human beings do matter.



Solidarity and subsidiarity



The church believes that human society should be built on a model of solidarity--that is, on the notion that each human being does not live in isolation but is dependent on and interwoven with the corporate whole of humanity.



The church also believes in the concept of subsidiarity--that affairs should be handled by the smallest or most local level first. The intervention of a centralized authority should only occur when no local authority is able to address the matter.



While this principle of subsidiarity fully comports with a federal system like the United States of America (and the worldwide Catholic church), the principle of solidarity--when put into practice--often results in a situation very much resembling the situation under communism. Since we are all "dependent" and interwoven" with each other, the church--and notice that here, as always, there is a politburo, a hierarchy, a "boss" of the social order, regardless of rhetoric to the contrary--politely orders that we distribute our excess the way it sees fit.



Solidarity, to be blunt, completely (and intentionally) contradicts the American ideal of individual reward for individual work.



Charity



This tenet is very vague, but it essentially holds that human beings should express love toward other human beings. The "in truth" that usually accompanies "charity" in formal documents qualifies this love as non-relativistic. Essentially, human beings are to love each other while still retaining a fixed position of truth.



Benedict XVI has given this tenet special prominence throughout his pontificate.



Distributism



This idea is somewhat convoluted but I will do my best to explain it here. Basically, the idea is that all the citizens of a state (or other social entity) should equally own/control the means of production. This would include land, machinery, and tools, but it would not include the actual capital used to produce goods.



In proposing this idea, the church attempts to forge a "third way" between atheistic communism and unbridled capitalism. Hilaire Belloc, one of Catholicism's most rabid theorists, described the distributive idea more fully in his book The Servile State. The desire of Belloc and others like him was to return society to the pre-capitalistic days of medieval Europe, when distinguished and wealthy families built localized fiefdoms offering peasants a "cooperative" share in the family enterprise by allotting them land and right within that social order. The Roman Catholic church, of course, would provide the distributive world-system with the overarching "glue" needed to bind disparate economies together, as well the "lubricant" needed to make them cooperate in solidarity toward a common goal.



As one economist has put it, "Distributists refer to capitalism as 'neo-feudalism,' but in reality, what they propose is a return to pre-capitalistic, medieval life. Their antipathy for the division of labor—that basic Smithian principle that has brought so much prosperity to the world—is grounded in a Marxist understanding of 'worker alienation.' Indeed, distributism could be considered a kinder, gentler Communism, and we all know how well that worked." (See this article)



The distributist ideology is consciously socialist and anti-capitalist--that really goes without saying.



PROBLEMS



There are many day-to-day problems created by socialist ideology, all of which are well-known and none of which I care to dwell on here. The major problem with Catholic socialism, however, occurs when it meets globalization. As long as this ideology was limited to particular countries (most notably in Europe), there was not much Americans could say. But with the rise of international organizations and the Vatican's aggressive lobbying of these organizations, the situation becomes suddenly more serious.



Within the past two decades, the church has been consciously trying to forge a "new international order" (see John Paul II's World Day of Peace message, 2004) based on the tenets of Catholic socialism. This order uses the principles of human dignity--which are, by themselves, completely noble--to justify a grand coalition that would cross national, ethnic, and religious boundaries in defense of "life." This order also uses the disparity between rich countries and poor countries to argue in favor of a "worldwide distribution of. . .resources." Most recently, this order has used the controversial climate crisis to justify a "global solidarity" (see Benedict XVI's World Day of Peace message, 2009) that, it is claimed, can "save humanity from. . .self-destruction" (see Benedict's WDP message for 2010).



The church's ultimate goal is to unite the planet under the authority of Rome. Some may think I am exaggerating, but I urge my readers to think about it logically:



- The Vatican believes it is the world's true spiritual capital, which gives it authority over all other spheres of human existence.



- The Vatican believes its message is the only message that will bring peace on earth (Pacem in terris, Pope John XXIII).



- The Vatican believes its duty is to "evangelize" the whole earth with this message, to bring its distinctive brand of social Christianity to all peoples, and to thus reshape the contours of human relations.



- The Vatican believes that it will ultimately be successful, and that the whole earth--under the guiding hand of the Roman Catholic church--will eventually move into a messianic age distinguished by love and dignity for all.



CONCLUSION



This confluence between Catholic socialism and Rome's desire for global governance is the basis for my concern that the Vatican is "one of the most dangerous actors in world politics today." The fact that so many people are falling for this blended and innovative "gospel"--indeed, so many Americans--only aggravates my concern and causes me to post information on this blog every day in order to warn those who may not be aware.



[There is a whole separate Christian argument why Catholic socialism is wrong, but I will not go into detail here. Suffice to say, Christians are called to spread only the gospel of Christ's death and resurrection, and to wait patiently for the day when Jesus will establish His kingdom upon this earth with power. Until that day, according to the Bible, there will be no peace on earth. In fact, any claims to establish universal peace prior to the arrival of this kingdom are instantly suspect.]



I encourage my readers to go back through the archives of this blog--especially in the categories "Catholic Socialism," "Global Governance," and "Eco-Theology"--and to read the speeches and articles that I have posted over the past year. Then venture outside this blog to read the many hundreds of other Catholic documents that speak to the topic (for one small example. Next, study the modern history of Europe, especially since World War II, and witness the practical results of policies promoted by Christian Democrats. Finally, compare the foundational aspects of American politics and economics with the Roman Catholic approach. You will find, I guarantee, that there is a stark difference between our model and the one preached by the Vatican.



If you are really diligent, go the Holy See's United Nations website and read all the speeches made by the Holy See's representative there. You will see immediately that the Vatican is not content to keep its ideology under a bushel, but is aggressively "evangelizing" the international community to accept it and implement it to the detriment of many.
Read more at thevaticanlobby.blogspot.com
 

7 Axioms of Vatican Geopolitics

7 Axioms of Vatican Geopolitics





1.  The Vatican believes that it, and it alone, is the world's legitimate religious and political authority.



2.  The Vatican cares nothing for national borders, national laws, or national sovereignty, unless those things coincide with the Vatican's own agenda.



3.  The Vatican seeks to establish a system of global governance modeled on the principles of Catholic socialism.



4.  The Vatican expands its power using its incredible stores of wealth.



5.  The Vatican has a long-term strategy that makes other nations' "long-term" strategies look silly.



6.  The Vatican wants Jerusalem.



7.  The Vatican seeks to make alliances with nations that will accept its yoke, but will challenge or even overthrow governments that refuse.

Gaza Priest Feels "Hatred for Israel"


Gaza Priest Feels "Hatred for Israel"

This article comes from Catholic Culture.
I find it interesting that this priest makes no mention of Hamas, or the countless rocket attacks on Israeli civilians which actually led to the outbreak of the Gaza War.  



Note the above picture, in which Father Musallam appears quite chummy with Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas's prime minister.

------------------------------------------------------



Gaza priest describes horror of bombing, blasts Israel



Speaking recently to the joint committee on foreign affairs of the Oireachtas-- Ireland’s parliament-- Msgr. Manuel Musallam, who recently retired from his ministry as parish priest in Gaza, described the horrors of the Israeli bombing of Gaza during the winter of 2008-9.

Msgr. Musallam said:



I am a Palestinian priest and I have suffered all that has happened to my people from my childhood until now. We have spoken too much about the crimes of war and crimes against humanity. I was in Gaza during the war and suffered with my people for 22 days. I saw with my own eyes a phosphoric bomb in the school yard. I saw people injured by these phosphoric bombs, although these bombs are forbidden. These crimes against us were ignored by all the people of the world. No-one was courageous enough until now to say “No” to Israel or “No” to America or to say “Stop killing” and “Stop making war”. What happened in Gaza was not a war. A war is a clash between soldiers, aircraft and weapons. We were victims, just victims. They destroyed Gaza. I was there and saw with my own eyes what happened. We in Gaza were treated like animals. We tried to speak out about these crimes, but until now nobody gave us the opportunity to speak out or took the time to listen to us …



We are not terrorists. We have not occupied Israel. Despite all they have suffered, Palestinians, do not want to co-exist with Israel. We want to exist with Israel and to live with Israel. We do not want to die to liberate Palestine. We want to live to build Palestine. We spoke about our sufferings, the killing and death and the suffering of widows and schoolchildren. I saw the children weeping because they trampled the blood of their fathers and mothers. I saw these children. They were in my school …



We are asking the world to give the Palestinian people their rights. The question is whether peace is possible. Despite all the difficulties, the crimes and the war, we as Palestinians say peace is possible if justice is possible. Who can provide justice for Palestine? If Israel is given justice, Palestine will be given justice at the same time. Peace is possible if truth is possible. Who can say what truth is when Israel lies all the time? Israel does not tell its people the truth. The world is not listening to what we are saying. People come to Palestine and see and discover what is happening, but once they return to their own countries, they forget. Peace is possible if development is possible. In Gaza more than 2 million fruitful trees have been uprooted and there is not a single man working in any part of Gaza. Nothing is working in Gaza. Industry has stopped. There is no cement to be found, building is impossible and all industry has stopped. We have been turned into beggars. We are humiliated and we are smashed into the ground. We want peace. Peace is possible if pardon and forgiveness is possible but in the meantime and in this situation, Israel is feeding hate and violence in the hearts of our children. When we say no to Israel, we say no to death and we ask Israel to stop feeding our hearts with violence, with hatred of Israel.



To protect Israel is to give Israel the force to accept peace. We are facing a religious war in the Middle East. They are preparing a religious war and such a war is very destructive. This war will not stop in the Middle East; it will also happen here. Israel now should use its force to achieve peace, otherwise, the weapons of Israel will cause her own destruction. Force must lead Israel to peace, not to more wars. War will not achieve peace. The way to peace is peace.
Read more at thevaticanlobby.blogspot.com
 

Vatican Security Sought US Training for Terrorist Threats


Vatican Security Sought US Training for Terrorist Threats

This article comes from the Catholic News Agency.
Al-Qaida hatred for Pope caused US worries about Vatican security



Rome, Italy, Dec 14, 2010 / 04:55 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- Speaking frankly about “the known al-Qaida antipathy to the Pope,” American embassy officials in 2008 asked the U.S. State Department to consider an effort to help Vatican security forces deal with terrorist threats.



The WikiLeaks website recently published a Dec. 19, 2008 State Department cable reputedly from the U.S. Embassy in Rome. The cable, classified as “secret,” documented a request from the U.S. Vatican Embassy to plan and fund a “crisis management tabletop exercise” with Vatican security services.



The stated purpose of this effort was to enhance the Vatican’s crisis response abilities and to “foster a dialogue with the Vatican on counter-terrorism.”



“Al-Qaida has publicly identified the Pope and the Catholic Church as an enemy (‘Crusaders’), and Vatican City attracts hundreds of thousands of American citizen visitors each year, both tourists and pilgrims,” the cable continued.



According to the cable, the head of the Vatican Gendarme Corps Domenico Giani had sought specific security training from the FBI, including explosives ordinance training for Vatican Gendarmerie members at the Quantico Marine Corps base in Virginia. However, the cable reported, Giani has been “reluctant to engage in a comprehensive dialogue with the United States about Vatican capabilities and preparedness to respond to a terrorist attack.”



While the famous Swiss Guard provides security for the Pope and visiting dignitaries, the Gendarme Corps is responsible for general security and law enforcement at the Vatican.



During a November 2008 conversation about al-Qaida’s threat to the Vatican, U.S. Vatican Embassy official Julieta Valls Noyes proposed to Giani a joint tabletop exercise on crisis management, to which he reportedly responded “positively.”



The Rome Embassy cable noted the Holy See’s sensitivity about appearing to be too close to any one state, which the embassy described as a challenge to fostering dialogue about security. Another challenge was “the Vatican’s conviction that its facilities must be easily accessible to all Catholics.”



According to the cable’s analysis, Giani’s interest in a crisis management exercise was an opportunity to better position the U.S. to help the Vatican prepare to respond to terrorist threats.

The cable appears to be WikiLeaks’ first release of a Vatican-related document that did not originate with the U.S. Embassy to the Holy See. The cable’s authorship is attributed to U.S. Ambassador to Italy Ronald Spogli.



More than 700 WikiLeaks cables originate at the U.S. Vatican Embassy, while about 100 others originate at other American embassies and consulates.



In a Dec. 3 response to CNA inquiries, the U.S. Vatican Embassy said it could not address the authenticity of any documents provided to the press. The embassy also condemned “in the strongest terms” the unauthorized disclosure of classified information.



For their part, Vatican officials have also advised “great prudence” in examining the WikiLeaks cables. Vatican spokesman Fr. Federico Lombardi said the reports reflect “the perceptions and opinions of those who wrote them” and cannot be considered as expressions of the Holy See or as exact quotations of its officials.
Read more at thevaticanlobby.blogspot.com
 

New Advice for Nuclear Strike - Don’t Flee, Get Inside - NYTimes.com

By WILLIAM J. BROAD



Suppose the unthinkable happened, and terrorists struck New York or another big city with an atom bomb. What should people there do? The government has a surprising new message: Do not flee. Get inside any stable building and don’t come out till officials say it’s safe.



The advice is based on recent scientific analyses showing that a nuclear attack is much more survivable if you immediately shield yourself from the lethal radiation that follows a blast, a simple tactic seen as saving hundreds of thousands of lives. Even staying in a car, the studies show, would reduce casualties by more than 50 percent; hunkering down in a basement would be better by far.



But a problem for the Obama administration is how to spread the word without seeming alarmist about a subject that few politicians care to consider, let alone discuss. So officials are proceeding gingerly in a campaign to educate the public.



“We have to get past the mental block that says it’s too terrible to think about,” W. Craig Fugate, administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, said in an interview. “We have to be ready to deal with it” and help people learn how to “best protect themselves.”



Officials say they are moving aggressively to conduct drills, prepare communication guides and raise awareness among emergency planners of how to educate the public.



Over the years, Washington has sought to prevent nuclear terrorism and limit its harm, mainly by governmental means. It has spent tens of billions of dollars on everything from intelligence and securing nuclear materials to equipping local authorities with radiation detectors.



The new wave is citizen preparedness. For people who survive the initial blast, the main advice is to fight the impulse to run and instead seek shelter from lethal radioactivity. Even a few hours of protection, officials say, can greatly increase survival rates.



Administration officials argue that the cold war created an unrealistic sense of fatalism about a terrorist nuclear attack. “It’s more survivable than most people think,” said an official deeply involved in the planning, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “The key is avoiding nuclear fallout.”



The administration is making that argument with state and local authorities and has started to do so with the general public as well. Its Citizen Corps Web site says a nuclear detonation is “potentially survivable for thousands, especially with adequate shelter and education.” A color illustration shows which kinds of buildings and rooms offer the best protection from radiation.



In June, the administration released to emergency officials around the nation an unclassified planning guide 130 pages long on how to respond to a nuclear attack. It stressed citizen education, before any attack.



Without that knowledge, the guide added, “people will be more likely to follow the natural instinct to run from danger, potentially exposing themselves to fatal doses of radiation.”



Specialists outside of Washington are divided on the initiative. One group says the administration is overreacting to an atomic threat that is all but nonexistent.



Peter Bergen, a fellow at the New America Foundation and New York University’s Center on Law and Security, recently argued that the odds of any terrorist group obtaining a nuclear weapon are “near zero for the foreseeable future.”



But another school says that the potential consequences are so high that the administration is, if anything, being too timid.



“There’s no penetration of the message coming out of the federal government,” said Irwin Redlener, a doctor and director of the National Center for Disaster Preparedness at Columbia University. “It’s deeply frustrating that we seem unable to bridge the gap between the new insights and using them to inform public policy.”



White House officials say they are aware of the issue’s political delicacy but are nonetheless moving ahead briskly.



The administration has sought “to enhance national resilience — to withstand disruption, adapt to change and rapidly recover,” said Brian Kamoie, senior director for preparedness policy at the National Security Council. He added, “We’re working hard to involve individuals in the effort so they become part of the team in terms of emergency management.”



A nuclear blast produces a blinding flash, burning heat and crushing wind. The fireball and mushroom cloud carry radioactive particles upward, and the wind sends them near and far.



The government initially knew little about radioactive fallout. But in the 1950s, as the cold war intensified, scientists monitoring test explosions learned that the tiny particles throbbed with fission products — fragments of split atoms, many highly radioactive and potentially lethal.



But after a burst of interest in fallout shelters, the public and even the government grew increasingly skeptical about civil defense as nuclear arsenals grew to hold thousands of warheads.



In late 2001, a month after the Sept. 11 attacks, the director of central intelligence told President George W. Bush of a secret warning that Al Qaeda had hidden an atom bomb in New York City. The report turned out to be false. But atomic jitters soared.



“History will judge harshly those who saw this coming danger but failed to act,” Mr. Bush said in late 2002.



In dozens of programs, his administration focused on prevention but also dealt with disaster response and the acquisition of items like radiation detectors.



“Public education is key,” Daniel J. Kaniewski, a security expert at George Washington University, said in an interview. “But it’s easier for communities to buy equipment — and look for tech solutions — because there’s Homeland Security money and no shortage of contractors to supply the silver bullet.”



After Hurricane Katrina in 2005 revealed the poor state of disaster planning, public and private officials began to question national preparedness for atomic strikes. Some noted conflicting federal advice on whether survivors should seek shelter or try to evacuate.



In 2007, Congress appropriated $5.5 million for studies on atomic disaster planning, noting that “cities have little guidance available to them.”



The Department of Homeland Security financed a multiagency modeling effort led by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. The scientists looked at Washington, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and other big cities, using computers to simulate details of the urban landscape and terrorist bombs.



The results were revealing. For instance, the scientists found that a bomb’s flash would blind many drivers, causing accidents and complicating evacuation.



The big surprise was how taking shelter for as little as several hours made a huge difference in survival rates.



“This has been a game changer,” Brooke Buddemeier, a Livermore health physicist, told a Los Angeles conference. He showed a slide labeled “How Many Lives Can Sheltering Save?”



If people in Los Angeles a mile or more from ground zero of an attack took no shelter, Mr. Buddemeier said, there would be 285,000 casualties from fallout in that region.



Taking shelter in a place with minimal protection, like a car, would cut that figure to 125,000 deaths or injuries, he said. A shallow basement would further reduce it to 45,000 casualties. And the core of a big office building or an underground garage would provide the best shelter of all.



“We’d have no significant exposures,” Mr. Buddemeier told the conference, and thus virtually no casualties from fallout.



On Jan. 16, 2009 — four days before Mr. Bush left office — the White House issued a 92-page handbook lauding “pre-event preparedness.” But it was silent on the delicate issue of how to inform the public.



Soon after Mr. Obama arrived at the White House, he embarked a global campaign to fight atomic terrorism and sped up domestic planning for disaster response. A senior official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the new administration began a revision of the Bush administration’s handbook to address the issue of public communication.



“We started working on it immediately,” the official said. “It was recognized as a key part of our response.”



The agenda hit a speed bump. Las Vegas was to star in the nation’s first live exercise meant to simulate a terrorist attack with an atom bomb, the test involving about 10,000 emergency responders. But casinos and businesses protested, as did Senator Harry Reid of Nevada. He told the federal authorities that it would scare away tourists.



Late last year, the administration backed down.



“Politics overtook preparedness,” said Mr. Kaniewski of George Washington University.



When the administration came out with its revised planning guide in June, it noted that “no significant federal response” after an attack would be likely for one to three days.



The document said that planners had an obligation to help the public “make effective decisions” and that messages for predisaster campaigns might be tailored for schools, businesses and even water bills.



“The most lives,” the handbook said, “will be saved in the first 60 minutes through sheltering in place.”


U.S. Tries to Build Case for Conspiracy by WikiLeaks

Amplify’d from www.nytimes.com

U.S. Tries to Build Case for Conspiracy by WikiLeaks











WASHINGTON — Federal prosecutors, seeking to build a case against the WikiLeaks leader Julian Assange for his role in a huge dissemination of classified government documents, are looking for evidence of any collusion in his early contacts with an Army intelligence analyst suspected of leaking the information.



Justice Department officials are trying to find out whether Mr. Assange encouraged or even helped the analyst, Pfc. Bradley Manning, to extract classified military and State Department files from a government computer system. If he did so, they believe they could charge him as a conspirator in the leak, not just as a passive recipient of the documents who then published them.


Among materials prosecutors are studying is an online chat log in which Private Manning is said to claim that he had been directly communicating with Mr. Assange using an encrypted Internet conferencing service as the soldier was downloading government files. Private Manning is also said to have claimed that Mr. Assange gave him access to a dedicated server for uploading some of them to WikiLeaks.


Adrian Lamo, an ex-hacker in whom Private Manning confided and who eventually turned him in, said Private Manning detailed those interactions in instant-message conversations with him.


He said the special server’s purpose was to allow Private Manning’s submissions to “be bumped to the top of the queue for review.” By Mr. Lamo’s account, Private Manning bragged about this “as evidence of his status as the high-profile source for WikiLeaks.”


Wired magazine has published excerpts from logs of online chats between Mr. Lamo and Private Manning. But the sections in which Private Manning is said to detail contacts with Mr. Assange are not among them. Mr. Lamo described them from memory in an interview with The Times, but he said he could not provide the full chat transcript because the F.B.I. had taken his hard drive, on which it was saved.


Since WikiLeaks began making public large caches of classified United States government documents this year, Justice Department officials have been struggling to come up with a way to charge Mr. Assange with a crime. Among other things, they have studied several statutes that criminalize the dissemination of restricted information under certain circumstances, including the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986.


But while prosecutors have used such laws to go after leakers and hackers, they have never successfully prosecuted recipients of leaked information for passing it on to others — an activity that can fall under the First Amendment’s strong protections of speech and press freedoms.


Last week, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said he had just authorized investigators to take “significant” steps, declining to specify them. This week, one of Mr. Assange’s lawyers in Britain said they had “heard from Swedish authorities there has been a secretly impaneled grand jury” in northern Virginia.


Justice Department officials have declined to discuss any grand jury activity. But in interviews, people familiar with the case said the department appeared to be attracted to the possibility of prosecuting Mr. Assange as a co-conspirator to the leaking because it is under intense pressure to make an example of him as a deterrent to further mass leaking of electronic documents over the Internet.


By bringing a case against Mr. Assange as a conspirator to Private Manning’s leak, the government would not have to confront awkward questions about why it is not also prosecuting traditional news organizations or investigative journalists who also disclose information the government says should be kept secret — including The New York Times, which also published some documents originally obtained by WikiLeaks.


“I suspect there is a real desire on the part of the government to avoid pursuing the publication aspect if it can pursue the leak aspect,” said Daniel C. Richman, a Columbia law professor and former federal prosecutor. “It would be so much neater and raise fewer constitutional issues.”


It has been known that investigators were looking for evidence that one or more people in Boston served as an intermediary between Private Manning and WikiLeaks, taking a disc of files he had copied from a computer while deployed in Iraq and somehow delivering it to the Web site.


But Mr. Lamo said Private Manning also sometimes uploaded information directly to Mr. Assange, whom he had initially sought out online. The soldier sent a “test leak” of a single State Department cable from Iceland to see if Mr. Assange and WikiLeaks were who they claimed to be, Mr. Lamo said.


“At some point, he became satisfied that he was actually talking to Assange and not some unknown third party posing as Assange, and based on that he began sending in smaller amounts of data from his computer,” Mr. Lamo said. “Because of the nature of his Internet connection, he wasn’t able to send large data files easily. He was using a satellite connection, so he was limited until he did an actual physical drop-off when he was back in the United States in January of this year.”


Still, prosecutors would most likely need more than a chat transcript laying out such claims to implicate Mr. Assange, Professor Richman said. Even if prosecutors could prove that it was Private Manning writing the messages to Mr. Lamo, a court might deem the whole discussion as inadmissible hearsay evidence.


Prosecutors could overcome that hurdle if they obtain other evidence about any early contacts — especially if they could persuade Private Manning to testify against Mr. Assange. But two members of a support network set up to raise money for his legal defense, Jeff Paterson and David House, said Private Manning had declined to cooperate with investigators since his arrest in May.


Meanwhile, WikiLeaks is taking steps to distance itself from the suggestion that it actively encourages people to send in classified material. It has changed how it describes itself on its submissions page. “WikiLeaks accepts a range of material, but we do not solicit it,” its Web site now says.


It also deleted the word “classified” from a description of the kinds of material it accepts. And it dropped an assertion that “Submitting confidential material to WikiLeaks is safe, easy and protected by law,” now saying instead: “Submitting documents to our journalists is protected by law in better democracies.”


WikiLeaks is also taking steps to position itself more squarely as a news organization, which would it easier to invoke the First Amendment as a shield. Where its old submissions page made few references to journalism, it now uses “journalist” and forms of the word “news” 23 times.


Another new sentence portrays its primary work as filtering and analyzing documents, not just posting them raw. It says its “journalists write news stories based on the material, and then provide a link to the supporting documentation to prove our stories are true.”

State’s Secrets





Articles in this series examine American diplomatic cables as a window on relations with the rest of the world in an age of war and terrorism.





Read more at www.nytimes.com
 

New Superbug Genes Sure to Spread, US Expert Says

Amplify’d from www.newsmax.com

New Superbug Genes Sure to Spread, US Expert Says


* New superbug genes now found in bacteria around world

* NDM-1 easily swapped by different germ species

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A little loop of genes that
give bacteria the power to resist virtually all known
antibiotics is spreading quickly and likely to cause doctors
headaches for years to come, an expert predicted Wednesday.

They come on the equivalent of a genetic memory stick -- a
string of genes called a transmissible genetic element.
Bacteria, unlike higher forms of life, can swap these gene
strings with other species and often do so with wild abandon.

This one is called New Delhi metallobeta-lactamase 1 or
NDM-1 for short and Dr. Robert Moellering of Harvard Medical
School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston
predicts it will cause more trouble in the coming years.

"What makes this enzyme so frightening is not only its
intrinsic ability to destroy most known beta-lactam antibiotics
but also the company it keeps,' Moellering wrote in a
commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine.

First described in 2008, NDM-1 has been found in a wide
variety of bacterial types, including the Enterobacteriaceae
family, klebsiella and Escherichia coli, all of which are
common and cause a range of infections.

British researchers reported in August infections involving
NDM-1 had been found in patients in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan
and Britain. [ID:nLDE67A0O1]

"In addition, isolates of Enterobacteriaceae-containing
NDM-1 have now been characterized in the United States, Israel,
Turkey, China, India, Australia, France, Japan, Kenya,
Singapore, Taiwan, and the Nordic countries," Moellering
wrote.

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria are nothing new -- virtually
all strains of the common Staphylococcus bacteria are now
resistant to penicillin. Almost as soon as penicillin was
introduced in the 1940s, bacteria began to develop resistance
to its effects, prompting researchers to develop many new
generations of antibiotics.

But their overuse and misuse have helped fuel the rise of
drug-resistant "superbugs." The U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention says most infections that people get
while in the hospital resist at least one antibiotic.

KILLER MRSA

For example, half of all Staphylococcus aureus infections
in the United States are resistant to penicillin, methicillin,
tetracycline and erythromycin. Methicillin-resistant staph
aureus or MRSA killed an estimated 19,000 people in the United
States alone in 2005.

NDM-1 resists many different types of antibiotic. In at
least one case, the only drug that affected it was colistin, a
toxic older antibiotic.

"Thus far, the majority of isolates in countries throughout
the world can be traced to subjects who have traveled to India
to visit family or have received medical care there,"
Moellering wrote.

"However, the ability of this genetic element to spread
rapidly among Enterobacteriaceae means that there will almost
certainly be numerous secondary cases throughout the world that
are unrelated to travel to the Indian subcontinent."

Experts have been warning for years that poor hospital
practices and the overuse of antibiotics spread dangerous
bacteria, but practices are changing only slowly.

"The fact that there is widespread nonprescription use of
antibiotics in India, a country in which some areas have less
than ideal sanitation and a high prevalence of diarrheal
disease and crowding, sets the ideal stage for the development
of such resistance," Moellering wrote.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)





© 2010 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.


Read more at www.newsmax.com
 

US Missile Defense Test Fails over Pacific

Amplify’d from www.newsmax.com

US Missile Defense Test Fails over Pacific









WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A test of the sole U.S.
defense against long-range ballistic missiles failed on
Wednesday, the second in a row involving the system managed by
Boeing Co, the Defense Department said.

Officials will investigate the cause of the failure to
intercept the target missile over the Pacific Ocean, said
Richard Lehner, a spokesman for the Pentagon's Missile Defense
Agency.
(Reporting by Jim Wolf)





© 2010 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.



Read more at www.newsmax.com
 

Martial Law: UK Police Chief Mulls Banning Protests

Amplify’d from theintelhub.com

Martial Law: UK Police Chief Mulls Banning Protests

Paul Joseph Watson

Infowars.com

UK police chief Sir Paul Stephenson is considering whether to ask the British government to ban protest marches altogether in response to last week’s student riots, a move that would place Britain under a de facto state of martial law.

“It is one of the tactics we will look at and something we will keep under review, and if we think it is the right thing to do then we will do it,” said the Metropolitan Police commissioner.

NUS president Aaron Porter responded: “Peaceful protest is an integral part of our heritage and it is the responsibility of the police to help facilitate that.”

Read more at theintelhub.com
 

Gordon Duff, Wikileaks Working With Israel?

Amplify’d from theintelhub.com

Gordon Duff, Wikileaks Working With Israel?

See more at theintelhub.com