ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Religious litmus test applied in Ariz.

Amplify’d from www.onenewsnow.com
Religious litmus test applied in Ariz.
Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow

In Arizona, a candidate for a panel to redraw congressional districts has been barred for his faith.

 

The Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments is charged with qualifying people for the state commission that will decide redistricting. Cathi Herrod, president of the Center for Arizona Policy, picks up the story from last week involving nominees for the Independent Redistricting Commission.

 

"At that meeting, a commissioner disqualified an applicant simply because of the applicant's religious faith," she explains. "Commissioner Louis Araneta spoke out against Christopher Gleason's application because he thought that it had 'strong religious overtones' and even said that 'there should be a separation of church and state.'"

 
Cathi Herrod (Center for AZ Policy)Herrod stresses that a person's religion has nothing to do with the redistricting effort -- but that it is a matter of doing the math and understanding the geography.

 

"We've called on Commissioner Araneta to resign his position," notes Herrod. "And we also have been concerned because out of the 13 other members of the commission, no one challenged Commissioner Araneta's use of religion as a disqualifier." (See update from AP below)

 

Herrod admits she finds such "religion bias" troubling. "...The Commission is the same group that nominates judges for Arizona's appellate courts," she says in a press release. "It's deeply disturbing that those individuals charged with selecting judges would say that faith in Jesus Christ is a disqualification for public service."

 

Gleason, from Pima County, is on the board of 4-Tucson, a Christian community service organization. Herrod tells OneNewsNow that should make it clear Gleason is not associated with a dangerous cult.

 

Panel member quits

Associated Press logo smallPHOENIX (AP) - A member of a state panel has resigned amid controversy over whether an applicant for Arizona's redistricting commission was rejected because of his involvement in a religious group.



Louis Araneta had voiced concern during a December 8 nominating commission meeting about separation of church and state while discussing Tucson businessman Christopher Gleason's application. The application included references to Gleason's involvement with a Christian community service organization.



Critics said Araneta and possibly other commission members seemed to have blackballed Gleason because of his religious activities. Araneta denied that in his resignation letter, and said he quit because he didn't want his comments to be a distraction for the commission, whose main job is screening applicants for appellate court openings.

Read more at www.onenewsnow.com
 

Border Patrol Agent Killed in Southern Arizona

Amplify’d from www.hapblog.com


Border Patrol Agent Killed in Southern Arizona

Arizona









kold.com
NOGALES, AZ (KOLD) - A Border Patrol agent has been shot and killed late Tuesday night in an area near Rio Rico, Ariz.

Agent Brian Terry encountered a group of suspects when he was shot at, a release from the Border Patrol detailed.

Four of those suspects were arrested. One is still at large
, authorities said.

Border Patrol officials and officers with the Department of Public Safety are scouring the area with K9 units in an effort to find that suspect.

The incident happened just after 11 p.m. in the Peck Canyon area just north of Nogales.

The Federal Bureau of Investigations is now involved in the case and is looking into the agent's death, Border Patrol spokesman Eric Cantu said.

"Our thoughts and prayers are with the Terry family for their tragic loss," said CBP Commissioner Alan Bersin. "Our commitment to Agent Terry and his family is that we will do everything possible to bring to justice those responsible for this despicable act."

KOLD News 13 has dispatched reporter Lauren Burgoyne to the scene
Read more at www.hapblog.com
 

HotAirPundit: California Mom To Sue McDonalds in Happy Meal Battle


HotAirPundit: Raw Video: High School Basketball Player Attacks Referee Over Ejection


So, Why Is Incest Wrong?

Amplify’d from www.albertmohler.com

So, Why Is Incest Wrong?

There are certain questions now pressed upon us that previous generations would never believe could be asked. One of these is thrust upon us by events in New York City, where a well-known Ivy League professor has been arrested for the crime of incest. What makes the question urgent is not so much the arrest, but the controversy surrounding it.

David Epstein is a professor of political science at Columbia University, where his wife also teaches. He previously taught on the faculties of Harvard and Stanford. Last week, he was arraigned before a judge in Manhattan, charged with a single count of felony incest. According to authorities, Professor Epstein was for several years involved in a sexual relationship with his adult daughter, now age 24.

Though the story was ignored by much of the mainstream media, it quickly found its way into the cultural conversation. William Saletan of Slate.com, who remains one of today’s most relevant writers working on the issues of bioethics and human nature, jumped on the story with a very interesting essay that openly asked the question many others were more quietly asking: “If homosexuality is OK, why is incest wrong?”

After reviewing the various legal arguments used to justify criminalizing incest, Saletan comes to the conclusion that genetics cannot be the fundamental basis, since incestuous sex could be non-reproductive. Similarly, the basic issue cannot be consent, since no one is arguing in this case that the sex was non-consensual.

He gets the liberal response just about right: “At this point, liberals tend to throw up their hands. If both parties are consenting adults and the genetic rationale is bogus, why should the law get involved? Incest may seem icky, but that’s what people said about homosexuality, too. It’s all private conduct.”

Saletan comes to the conclusion that the basic reason for the wrongfulness of incest is damage to the family unit. As an Ohio court ruled, “A sexual relationship between a parent and child or a stepparent and stepchild is especially destructive to the family unit.”

Now, remember that Saletan raised the issue of the morality of incest as related to the question of homosexuality. He argues that the family-damage argument against incest does not apply to homosexuality. In his words: “When a young man falls in love with another man, no family is destroyed.”

Saletan’s argument is easy to follow, and if you accept his fundamental premise, it can even make sense. But his fundamental premise assumes that there is no damage to a particular family unit if a homosexual relationship exists. That argument can be made only by ignoring the impact upon a family of origin. Beyond this, it limits the family-damage argument to an individual family, when the argument must be more broadly applied to the family as an institution.

This article is a very interesting window into the sexual confusions that lie at the heart of our age. To his credit, Saletan gets the conservative argument basically right:

The conservative view is that all sexual deviance—homosexuality, polyamory, adultery, bestiality, incest—violates the natural order. Families depend on moral structure: Mom, Dad, kids. When you confound that structure—when Dad sleeps with a man, Dad sleeps with another woman, or Mom sleeps with Grandpa—the family falls apart. Kids need clear roles and relationships. Without this, they get disoriented. Mess with the family, and you mess up the kids.

That’s a pretty fair summary. Of course, the Christian argument goes much deeper than the merely conservative argument, affirming the fact that, with exacting precision, God has spoken to the sinfulness of such behaviors — specifically condemning both homosexuality and incest. In other words, Christians move the question from mere wrongfulness to sinfulness and place all issues of sin within the biblical account of sin and redemption.

It is extremely revealing that, for many of our fellow citizens, incest may merely “seem icky.” And yet, all around us are folks who, with a straight face, deny the inevitability of this slippery slope.

I am always glad to hear from readers. Write me at mail@albertmohler.com. Follow regular updates on Twitter at www.twitter.com/AlbertMohler.

Read more at www.albertmohler.com
 

Prime Minister of Kosovo Accused of Leading a Heroin and Organ-Stealing Ring

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Prime Minister of Kosovo Accused of Leading a Heroin and Organ-Stealing RingHashim Thaçi, the prime minister of Kosovo, runs a criminal gang that "smuggl[es]weapons, drugs and human organs through eastern Europe," according to a forthcoming report from the Council of Europe.

Thaçi was a leader of the Kosovo Liberation Army in the late 1990s—when he earned the nom de guerre "the Snake"—and became the head of Kosovo's government in 2007. He won reelection last weekend. While accusations that Thaçi runs a criminal network are by no means new, the Council of Europe report, which was obtained by the Guardian, has some stunning details. Like the Serbian prisoners of war who were murdered for their kidneys:


It finds the KLA did hold mostly Serb captives in a secret network of six detention facilities in northern Albania, and that Thaçi's Drenica group "bear the greatest responsibility" for prisons and the fate of those held in them.


They include a "handful" of prisoners said to have been transferred to a makeshift prison just north of Tirana, where they were killed for their kidneys.


The report states: "As and when the transplant surgeons were confirmed to be in position and ready to operate, the captives were brought out of the 'safe house' individually, summarily executed by a KLA gunman, and their corpses transported swiftly to the operating clinic."


It also accuses Thaçi and his cohorts, which the report characterizes as essentially criminal gang that took over the KLA a decade ago, of exerting "violent control" over Eastern Europe's heroin trade and conducting "assassinations, detentions, beatings and interrogations." The Albanian government has denounced the report as "despicable and bizarre."


Send an email to the author of this post at john@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Government Files Enormous Lawsuit over Oil Spill

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Government Files Enormous Lawsuit over Oil SpillRemember that little "Gulf of Mexico oil spill" story from the summer? The government won't let it slide! The Justice Department has filed a multi-billion dollar lawsuit against BP and others, seeking removal costs and damages. Lots of it.

We're no legal eagles, but this sucker looks aggressive. The suit "asks that the companies be held liable without limitation under the Oil Pollution Act for all removal costs and damages caused by the oil spill, including damages to natural resources," and also "seeks civil penalties under the Clean Water Act." Sounds like there's a lot of money on the line! We're betting Big Oil has good lawyers, though.

Here are the other companies involved:


The other defendants in the case are Anadarko Exploration & Production LP and Anadarko Petroleum Corp.; MOEX Offshore 2007 LLC; Triton Asset Leasing GMBH; Transocean Holdings LLC and Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. and Transocean Deepwater Inc.; and BP's insurer, QBE Underwriting Ltd./Lloyd's Syndicate 1036.


There's a severe lack of "Halliburton" on that list. Otherwise, sue away! Lawsuits are generally a better way to get global corporations to pay for things instead of simply asking them to.

Image via Getty


Send an email to Jim Newell, the author of this post, at newell@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

It Wouldn't Be Christmas Without an Al-Qaida Terror Plot

Amplify’d from gawker.com

It Wouldn't Be Christmas Without an Al-Qaida Terror PlotIraqi authorities have rounded up 73 suspected Al-Qaida operatives in recent weeks, some of whom claim to members of cells planning Christmastime attacks in the U.S. and Europe.

The Iraqi government has officially warned American and European intelligence agencies of the plots, which the Associated Press says are viewed as "credible" by U.S. authorities:


[Iraqi Interior Minister Jawad] Al-Bolani said several insurgents claimed to be part of a cell that took its orders directly from al-Qaida's central leadership. He said at least one of the captured suspects was a foreign fighter from Tunisia.


[snip]


An Iraqi intelligence official said threat information appeared to indicate that Denmark might be attacked, but refused to give details. Similarly, a senior U.S. intelligence official in Washington said authorities were closely watching two people in an unspecified European country suspected of being linked to the plot. The people did not appear to be so-called homegrown terrorists, according to the U.S. official who would not say where they were believed to be from.


The suicide bombing in Sweden last week—by an Iraqi-born Swede—was among the plots that the detainees told Iraqi intelligence they were planning, the AP says. U.S. officials are of course on high alert during Christmas season anyway, since the underwear bomber attempted to strike on Christmas Day last year. Happy shopping.


Send an email to the author of this post at john@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

'Birther Soldier' Keeps Fighting in Military Court


Pope Captivated By Shirtless Male Acrobats

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Pope Captivated By Shirtless Male AcrobatsThere was quite a show at the Vatican today, as a troupe of male acrobats ripped off their shirts and performed for the Pope. The nuns, meanwhile, "cheered enthusiastically and even snapped photos of the bare-chested men." Hilarious footage below.


Send an email to Jim Newell, the author of this post, at newell@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com