ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Racial tensions intensify as black leaders locked out of “private” meeting

Amplify’d from www.examiner.com

Racial tensions intensify as black leaders locked out of “private” meeting


C.D. "Slitherspoon" Witherspoon???


Slideshow: A look inside the "secret" meeting


Organizer locks out black leaders, only inviting those he was familiar with while the real leaders of this community were locked out and not given an invitation!

The long awaited and highly anticipated meeting of Jewish and African American leaders took place last night, without any real black leaders in attendance other than a few select. The meeting organized by Cortly ‘C.D.’ Witherspoon – commonly referred to outside as Mr. Slitherspoon – was the most outrageous and ridiculous atrocity of mismanaged leadership I have ever witnessed in this town. Being a former resident of Park Heights for years, growing up down the street from this planned meeting on Belvedere and Park Heights Avenues, I saw the real leaders of the community I still represent to the fullest, standing outside in the cold, while lacking the proper invitation to this circus of a meeting.

Witnessing countless Jewish leaders enter the building adjacent to the Jewish Community Center located off of Park Heights Avenue, there were little to no real African American leadership present. Banning all media outlets from attendance, only allowing for a brief photo shoot of the attendees in the beginning of the meeting, they [participants] acted as if this was some sort of Fraternity of Masonic Order with secret codes and hidden messages, as no participant spoke as the media were attempting to get the very limited coverage we were allowed. Being disrespected and spoken to as if we were second-class citizens by organizers, the fourth estate that these so-called leaders call on timelessly to get their message out to the mainstream had no hesitation in treating this group of cold and tired hard working men and women as if we were a pestering bunch of parasites.

As community leaders and citywide patrons began to appear trying to gain entry in the meeting that was originally scheduled for 6:00P, they soon found out that this was only for the political and Jewish elite. The meeting was originally set for a different location in lower Park Heights’ Zeta Center (the black community); it was later changed to the Jewish community without advanced knowledge or invitation to try and hide it from the real community and citywide leaders! Fearing these persons inside did not represent their interests; protesters began speaking out against this foolish attempt at solving a problem that is an underlying constant each day in these neighborhoods.

Not invited were people such as Pastor Lunn, the 36-year Reverend for Park Heights’ oldest black church Berean Baptist, as well as Coach Owens, President of the Columbus Drive Improvement Association who said that “it is a shame these people are doing this without the input of us community folk and leaders. However, I came, got turned away and now I am off to the real meeting with the real community leaders at the Zeta building.” This second meeting the Coach was referring to was organized by the group who put together Saturday nights meeting which was covered only by this Examiner on Monday (found here).

However, people such as Keith Snipes and Chris Blake weren’t as reserved and statesman-like as the Pastor and Coach, speaking with an inflamed passion for being disrespected. “This is about some people gaining self-indulgence and some sort of personal prestige by quickly calling a meeting on a story they jumped on without having all the facts and knowing all the players,” said Blake. Yet Snipes stated in his remarks, as chants were echoed of “Slitherspoon strikes again”, that “his sense was that people’s pride and so-called accomplishments seemed to take over their rational mind. We have a black mayor who is not here; a long list of black elected officials who were also not invited. Yet when they have a meeting in the Jewish area of Baltimore they bring out the cavalry to protect them.” Referring to the three squad cars, paddy-wagon and several uniformed officers’ stationed out front of the building.

However inside, as I had eyes and ears reporting back to me from inside the room, there was a bunch of confusion with very little accomplished? Beginning the meeting and lasting almost forty-five minutes, Councilwomen Sharon Greene-Middleton and Rochelle ‘Rikki’ Spector started their barrage of verbal attacks on Mr. Witherspoon about why they were not invited, as this was their districts and stating they never seen him anywhere in Park Heights, at community association meetings, events, clean-ups or even at a northwest store. “I informed them that there would be no meeting without me,” stated Spector to me outside the meeting building. “Sharon and I just found out about this and it is very disrespectful as we were the persons elected to represent the interests of these citizens, not Mr. Witherspoon.” However after a tiring combined effort of “who are you and why are you here” styled questioning of CD, he then proceeded to throw a tantrum, as usual, and stormed out of the room attempting to leave his own meeting. It was left to Councilwoman Belinda Conaway, who was originally left out in the cold being held off the list while her Court Clerk father was present from the start, to actually bring the young and childish Witherspoon back into the rooms.

After the meeting finally adjourned, though leaders such as Frank Conaway Sr. (Papa Bear) and Clarence Mitchell III (the Bear) tried to come to some sort of agreed upon solution, apparently nothing was accomplished by this monumental waste of time. Joseph Armstead, the outgoing NAACP third vice-president of the Baltimore Branch, was in attendance and stated that, “No resolution was found last night, but a start to some helpful dialogue was hopefully started.” Hiding from the media cameras, as he arrived an hour early and snuck out the back doors in his exiting the meeting, Mr. Witherspoon had no comment regarding this meeting and his possible attempts to continue to represent the Park Heights community. One thing was certainly missing from this very important meeting…the child who was assaulted, along with any of his family members, lawyers or representatives.

However about ten blocks down the road, at 4501 Reisterstown Rd. (Wylie  Ave.), the real meeting was taking place. Members of the original meeting on Saturday were present, with about 3-times the size of the Witherspoon meeting and open to the public; this group also included those members that could have a long lasting affect on this situation. NAACP leaders, Pastor Heber Brown, Willie Flowers and others were joined by the Northwestern Police Major, along with the Northwestern High School principal who oversees the school in this district that the young man who was assaulted attends. Lasting a few hours and allowing full participation by the community, this group was also later attended by those who were at the upper Park Heights meeting.

Calling on the Councilwomen (Spector and Middleton) who decided to sit in the back and talk amongst themselves, they arrogantly took this time to slam the first meeting alluding to their concentration on this matter and others they continuously do each and every day. Hearing their names called, standing up Middleton audibly announced for some to hear her, “Finally,” as if they took too long on calling on her “expertise”. Taking the stage to close out the meeting, Spector ended it with the words that seemed to wrap up the night’s events. “Tough times are for tough people. For tough times shall pass, however tough people shall remain to fight others!”

These past meetings and division amongst the African American leadership of who shall take the lead in resolving this matter, has seen many of the original leaders ostracized, either recanting previous positions or clarifying current ones. As Mr. Witherspoon was the first to respond to this matter regarding the original Baltimore Sun article about the young Northwestern High 15-year old black man being allegedly assaulted by a 23-year old former Special Forces officer and current community “watchers” group, Shomrim employee. (Also covered by this Examiner originally here) This Jewish group saw its officer possibly place this entire cities political and racial reputation on the line based on one act of blatant stupidity. Yet as former NAACP Baltimore Branch President Marvin ‘Doc’ Cheatham was originally one of the valiant and most vocal supporters of these efforts in the black community, calling for at least a suspension of the Shomrim group throughout this period of investigation, as black groups were such as COIL; he now has retracted such statements and positions, placing a letter-to-the-editor in the Sun saying the following:

“I am now and always have been a strong supporter of citizens on patrol groups. I am not one of those who have called for the Shomrim community patrol [group] to be disbanded?”


This is not what I recall being said by the former president in Saturday’s meeting and a later discussion with him via telephone the next day? However I may be wrong? Also clarifying his stance, along with that of his group, in which he is the current Vice-President, was Reverend Heber Brown III of the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance. “I am NOT connected to this meeting. In fact, I have not even officially been given details about it [meeting]. The organizer of this meeting is Rev. C.D. Witherspoon,” said Brown in a statement released through his Pleasant Hope church list-serve which was later posted by Kinji Scott here. Continuing on to ensure those following these efforts are not confused or misinformed about the convoluted process, the young pastor states the following:

“I told Rev. Witherspoon on the evening of Thursday, December 2, 2010 that I had reservations about being a part of his 'dialogue effort'. As Rev. Witherspoon's meeting has taken greater shape, I've become increasingly uncomfortable with it given its lack of community participation and the restrictive nature of the details about the gathering.


Let me repeat. I am NOT connected to this meeting and given what I know about it at this point, I can not in good faith lend my individual support to it though I pray that something substantive comes out of it. My focus has been and will continue to be justice for the 15-year-old African American male and a full accounting of all who were involved in his attack.


Furthermore, let me also be clear that the press release disseminated by the Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance (IMA) was in fact, a statement crafted and sanctioned by the organization. On Thursday, December 2, 2010, President Alvin Gwynn, Sr. appointed a committee to spearhead the IMA's response to this issue and asked me to lead the committee. I've been working diligently to keep all members of the committee abreast of the latest details of this rapidly developing story. I was asked by President Gwynn to connect with WBAL (Jayne Miller) for an interview and that's what I did. In addition, other media outlets also contacted me to speak further on the IMA's position.”    


For further information on this article and more email me here, follow me on Twitter, Friend me on Facebook, view past shows of the Reporters’ Roundtable here, or view future show clips and campaign/communications services provided by my company here.

Read more at www.examiner.com
 

Former Masonic grand master denies allegations of racism  - News - The Charleston Gazette - West Virginia News and Sports -


Obama and Big Government vs. 'God's America'? - Newsweek


Not just comfort and joy: the truth about Christmas carols

Amplify’d from www.thestar.com

Not just comfort and joy: the truth about Christmas carols

A full house at St. Paul’s Bloor Street Church during last year’s annual Christmas Carol concert for the Star Santa Claus Fund. This year’s sold-out show is on Saturday.

A full house at St. Paul’s Bloor Street Church during last year’s annual Christmas Carol concert for the Star Santa Claus Fund. This year’s sold-out show is on Saturday.

David Cooper/TORONTO STAR
Marcia Adair


SPECIAL TO THE STAR

In church, in concert or at the mall, the music of Christmas is inescapable. But how well do we really understand what we’re listening to? Most of the songs we’ve heard so many times we really only pay close attention to the words while mumbling through the third and fourth verses on a carol sing.

On the occasion of this Saturday’s 32nd annual Christmas Carol concert at St. Paul’s Bloor Street Church, a fundraiser for the Toronto Star’s Santa Claus Fund, we offer a completely arbitrary lexicon of words found in Christmas songs and the customs to which they refer.

Wassailing: Essentially an excuse for a booze-up, wassailing is a type of Christmas trick-or-treating/extortion. Peasants would turn up on the doorstep of the feudal lord that owned their land and start singing. In exchange, the lord would give out drink and food. The idea was that because they were wishing the lord well (love and joy come to you and to you your wassail too), it wasn’t begging. It was one of the only times of the year peasants wouldn’t have to trade their dignity for a full belly.


“We Wish You a Merry Christmas” is a slightly more sinister wassailing carol. In England, it was not uncommon for groups of teenaged boys to go around to the wealthy houses in their neighbourhood and demand food and drink. (We won’t go until we get some.) Neighbours that weren’t immediately forthcoming risked having their house vandalized.


Gitchi Manitou (“’Twas in the moon of wintertime when all the birds had fled, That mighty Gitchi Manitou sent angel choirs instead”): The “Huron Carol,” sometimes called “’Twas in the Moon of Wintertime,” is Canada’s oldest carol. It was written in 1643 by Jesuit missionary Jean de Brébeuf in the native language of the Wendat/Huron people he was trying to convert near what is now Midland, Ont.


Gitchi Manitou, the Algonquian word for deity or spirit, was co-opted by missionaries trying to describe the idea of a Christian God to aboriginals. The “Huron Carol” was translated into English in 1926.


Bells: This seems rather basic at first glance but stay with me. There are two types of bells referenced in Christmas songs: church bells and sleigh bells.


“Ding Dong Merrily on High,” “Carol of the Bells,” “Silver Bells” and “I Heard the Bells on Christmas Day” all refer to church bells. In the days before wristwatches and noise ordinances, church bells were rung for at least half an hour at the beginning and end of services and at times of celebration (weddings, coronations, baptisms, etc.).


On Christmas Eve, the bells would be rung at midnight to announce Christ’s birth and again in the morning to remind everyone that they were late for church. Now that bells aren’t rung very often, an image of the bell itself represents the celebratory air of the season.


“Jingle Bells” and “Sleigh Ride” tell of a much more cheeky sort of bell-ringing. If one-horse open sleighs (that is two-person sleighs pulled by one horse) were the Corvettes of the 19th century, then the horse’s harness was the after-market rims and spoiler. A young man pulling up to church or the village hall in his sleigh with bells polished and jingling would catch the eye of all eligible young ladies. Very much the point of the endeavour.


The social customs of the Victorian period dictated that young men and women could not spend time together unchaperoned. Taking Miss Fanny Bright for a ride in your sleigh meant that you could have some time alone. Even if it was a four-person sleigh with another couple riding along, there was still a chance to snuggle close under the blankets with your beloved to “keep warm.”


An overturned sleigh (“We got into a drifted bank and then we got upsot”) provided even more opportunity and one gets the impression in “Jingle Bells” that the upsotting wasn’t entirely accidental.


Yule: Brought to England by the Norse, Yule is a pagan festival observed from late December to early January. When it was merged with Christianity in the 11th century, Yule became the Twelve Days of Christmas.


Even 1,000 years ago, people weren’t above one-upmanship, and competition for the largest Yule log meant that eventually trees much too big for the already enormous open-hearthed fireplaces were laid on the floor and fed into the fire until, days later (the more the better), it was finally consumed.


Eventually, houses got too small to have open-hearthed fires, so burning a Yule log gave way to consuming the log in cake form. Not a bad trade.


Holly & Ivy: While they are always sung of together (“Sans Day Carol,” “Holly & the Ivy”), ivy is more of a hanger-on — the Nicole Richie to holly’s Paris Hilton. Both have been used for over 700 years as Christmas decorations by the Church and before that were central to pagan winter solstice celebrations and the Roman Saturnalia.


The central place this pair has earned is likely a matter of convenience: both holly and ivy grow naturally all over Western Europe through the winter, were easily available and priced right for the hovel segment of the decorating market.


In the days of practically universal illiteracy, the Church routinely transformed everyday objects into representations of Christ. In this case, the white berry was a reminder of the silk in which the infant Jesus was wrapped. Later in the season, the red berry was Christ’s blood and the prickliness of the leaves the crown of thorns.


This season, when you switch on your favourite Christmas records or join in a carol sing, spare a thought for charity extortionists, keeping up with the Joneses and frisky teenagers. Plus ça change.

Read more at www.thestar.com
 

Jesuit: "I Am A Religious Atheist"

Amplify’d from www.ncregister.com

Jesuit: "I Am A Religious Atheist"

by Pat Archbold

You know the old expression “kids say the darnedest things?” Well sometimes old Jesuits say the damnedest things.



Perhaps we are at the point where writing about an old Jesuit spouting heretical stuff is like writing “dog bites man,” but let’s have a go shall we?



Roger P. Lenaers SJ,(85) of the parish Vorderhornbach in the diocese is in Innsbruck spoke at a lecture in Vienna.  You know how old men tell you what they really think without the filters younger men put in place?  Well Fr. Lenaers told us what he really thinks.



He started by saying** ““modern science” have brought to light that the universe follow its own laws, is autonomous and is not directed from the outside.”



It then follows, he says, that all religion should be an “atheistic faith”  and

“What then of this modern, but also Christian image of God? It must be atheistic and, thus, contain a rejection of everything that has to do with the God-on-high. And this is no small undertaking, for the Creed and the Bible and the liturgy and the whole morality and the church history are full of God-on-high, “he says.

Yes, we must dump the Creed and the Bible and morality and Church history and liturgy in favor of some fleeting (and mostly wrong) modern conception of the universe in order appeal to people who have already rejected God.  Sounds like a plan.



Or maybe, just maybe, we could tell them the truth about a God who sent his only begotten son to show us the way and to die for our sins.  We could tell them about that.  You know, the Truth.  We could tell them the Truth.



Father concludes that he considers himself to be a “religious atheist.”  I think the rough translation on that is “fool.”



ht Eponymous Flower



**Note - All quotes computer translated.

Read more at www.ncregister.com
 

Books Probe Christmas's Religious Origins

Christmas, or "Christ's mass," is no exception, even though Tobin says the actual date of Jesus' birth likely was not Dec. 25.

Amplify’d from www.huffingtonpost.com
Christmas Origins

By Whitney Jones

Religion News Service

(RNS) Somewhere in all of the sparkly lights and wrapped packages and jolly elves of Christmas, there is -- or was -- a religious story at the heart of the holiday, and three new books argue it shouldn't be forgotten.



In Christmas: A Festival of Incarnation, Lutheran theologian Donald Heinz emphasizes the importance of the incarnation of Christ -- God made flesh -- as the root of Christmas.



Heinz's book highlights how the manger story has influenced music, literature and art throughout history, and warns that the commercialization associated with the holiday should not take precedence over its religious origins.



"Christmas is being buried by an avalanche of materialism and commerce," said Heinz, a professor of religious studies at California State University, Chico. "The church is going to have to reclaim the religiousness of Christmas if it's going to survive."



Heinz doesn't completely condemn Christmas shopping or gifts; instead he tries to balance between "holiday" and "holy day." The focus, he said, should not be on glamorous presents, but instead on what Christians believe was God's gift in the manger.



"It's easier to imagine (Christmas) without religion than it is without shopping," he said in an interview. "That's kind of dramatic ... but it seems to be true to me."



Greg Tobin, an award-winning Catholic author, also calls for a return to the religious roots of Christmas and other holidays in his upcoming book, Holy Holiday! The Catholic Origins of Celebration.



The New Jersey author explores Catholic and other religious traditions of holidays, from Easter to Halloween to New Year, showing just how much church history is intertwined with the origins of popular holidays.



Christmas, or "Christ's mass," is no exception, even though Tobin says the actual date of Jesus' birth likely was not Dec. 25.



"The birth date of Jesus has never been fully answered," he said. "The Gospel accounts, as well as other traditions that have grown up around it, have enriched our appreciation for the event but in my mind only deepened the mystery."



Besides celebrating the birth of Jesus, Tobin notes that Christmas trees, cards and gifts all have connections to the church. In fact, tradition holds that the first person to light a Christmas tree was none other than Martin Luther.



While Heinz and Tobin focus on the religious roots of Christmas, biblical literature scholar Brent Landau offers a new story about the three wise men in his book, Revelation of the Magi: The Lost Tale of the Wise Men's Journey to Bethlehem.



The story, which he translated into English from an 8th century manuscript squirreled away in the Vatican library, fills in the details about the wise men the Gospel of Matthew does not include.



In Landau's translation of the ancient manuscripts, the Magi descend from Adam and Eve's third son, Seth, and a prophecy of "a star of indescribable brightness" received in the Garden of Eden. The Magi -- probably more than three, perhaps as many as 12 or dozens more --

traveled from China and were eventually baptized by Thomas, the apostle.



Their names are exotic: Zaharwandad, Austazp, Mihruq, Nasardih. The visiting wise men are not named in the Bible, and tradition has called them Gaspar, Melchior and Balthasar.



In this story, the term "Magi" doesn't connote images of magicians or astrologers, but rather something closer to a mystic who prays silently. At one point, the Virgin Mary accuses the visitors of trying to steal her baby.



"Of the witnesses we've got, this one is the most impressive because it gives the magi a back story," said Landau, a religious studies professor at the University of Oklahoma.



Landau presents The Revelation of the Magi as a way to enrich the traditional Christmas story, and said it "sheds some light on what early Christians were thinking about these characters."

Related News On Huffington Post:

More News Posts:  « First   Prev  1  2  Next   Last » 


 
























Read more at www.huffingtonpost.com
 

The Pope, PETA and Overpopulation

Amplify’d from www.huffingtonpost.com
The Pope, PETA and Overpopulation

Ingrid Newkirk


President and co-founder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)



In the wake of Pope Benedict's controversy-igniting comment that condom use may be acceptable under certain circumstances to reduce the risk of HIV infection, PETA has started some controversy of its own. We're seizing the opportunity to draw attention to dogs' and cats' inability to control their burgeoning overpopulation problem, one that means millions of them go homeless every year and end up being destroyed -- even some by PETA, so you know it's serious. Beginning at the Vatican last week and soon moving on to cathedrals and churches across the U.S., PETA members are going to be handing out leaflets featuring an image of the Pope holding a condom and the message "Dogs & Cats Can't Use Condoms. We Are in the Midst of an Unholy Animal Overpopulation Crisis. Spay or Neuter Today." Some Roman Catholics who can't conceive of the idea that religion can be the subject of humor are in an uproar over this too, while others find nothing offensive about the ad given that the Pope has advocated kindness to animals numerous times. The pontiff has a lot on his plate and hasn't got around to this issue yet, but he might, given that saving the lives of homeless dogs and cats is inarguably kind.

The result of dogs and cats having unprotected sex -- a massive overpopulation crisis -- is as deadly for them as HIV is for humans. Every year, up to 8 million animals end up in shelters across the U.S., and about half of these animals end up at the incinerator or city dump because there aren't enough good homes for them all. Death by painless injection actually looks good when millions of other dogs and cats are abandoned on the streets, where they starve, die of untreated injuries or illnesses, succumb to freezing temperatures, get run over, or are tortured and killed by people who enjoy sadist acts.

It's hard to come to grips with the fact that every new puppy or kitten bred by a pet shop pimp, breeder or unthinking family, steals the chances of a homeless animal filling that slot, but they do. And there are no instant, just-add-water homes to be had no matter how hard you look for them. I mean, maybe you can place one, or even two, animals with your friends and family, but most of us ran out of those vacancies at the inn long ago. With so many animals and so few decent homes, real shelters -- ones that don't up their donations by declaring themselves "no kill" and thereby slamming the door on all but the few animals they can cope with -- have no choice but to get out the needle for unadopted animals so as to make room for the never-ending stream of unwanted at the door.

Which brings me to breeders and pet stores again: They rarely require that the animals they sell be sterilized, meaning that the puppies and kittens can soon go on to have litters of their own, producing thousands more animals over the course of a few rapidly sexually maturing generations, and so further exacerbating the overpopulation crisis. Meaning, please seek a rescue group if you want a particular breed, look in your local shelter for a surprise find, or, better yet, get over the "purebred" fetish and find out how stable, loyal and companionable the all-American mutt can be.



If animals could wear condoms, it would prevent so much suffering, but since they can't, it's up to our species to take responsibility for not only our own reproduction, but that of the dogs and cats in our homes. By having our dogs and cats "fixed," and by encouraging and helping everyone else to do the same, we can help create the "no-birth" nation that might one day make a "no-kill nation" more than words on the wind and wishful thinking. Sterilizations are among the most routine and safest surgeries veterinarians perform, and spayed females have no risk of uterine or ovarian cancer, and are far less likely to develop breast cancer. Neutered males have no risk of testicular cancer and are less prone to prostate disease. Sterilization can also help decrease animals' aggression (making sterilized dogs less likely to bite) and reduce unwanted behaviors, such as urine marking which sometimes sees them ending up homeless.

The Pope may not have talked about animal birth control yet, but dogs and cats and PETA can't wait. All I know is that, whatever our religion, or if we've none at all, as long as millions of healthy, loving, perfectly adoptable dogs and cats are being destroyed every year for no other reason than a lack of homes, bringing more animals into the world is downright sinful.

Read more at www.huffingtonpost.com
 

Tolerance Isn't Good Enough: The Need for Mutual Respect In Interfaith Relations

Amplify’d from www.huffingtonpost.com
Tolerance Isn't Good Enough: The Need for Mutual Respect In Interfaith Relations





Rajiv Malhotra


Founder, Infinity Foundation



It is fashionable in interfaith discussions to advocate "tolerance" for other faiths. But we would find it patronizing, even downright insulting, to be "tolerated" at someone's dinner table. No spouse would appreciate being told that his or her presence at home was being "tolerated." No self-respecting worker accepts mere tolerance from colleagues. We tolerate those we consider inferior. In religious circles, tolerance, at best, is what the pious extend toward people they regard as heathens, idol worshippers or infidels. It is time we did away with tolerance and replaced it with "mutual respect."

Religious tolerance was advocated in Europe after centuries of wars between opposing denominations of Christianity, each claiming to be "the one true church" and persecuting followers of "false religions." Tolerance was a political "deal" arranged between enemies to quell the violence (a kind of cease-fire) without yielding any ground. Since it was not based on genuine respect for difference, it inevitably broke down.

My campaign against mere tolerance started in the late 1990s when I was invited to speak at a major interfaith initiative at Claremont Graduate University. Leaders of major faiths had gathered to propose a proclamation of "religious tolerance." I argued that the word "tolerance" should be replaced with "mutual respect" in the resolution. The following day, Professor Karen Jo Torjesen, the organizer and head of religious studies at Claremont, told me I had caused a "sensation." Not everyone present could easily accept such a radical idea, she said, but added that she herself was in agreement. Clearly, I had hit a raw nerve.

I then decided to experiment with "mutual respect" as a replacement for the oft-touted "tolerance" in my forthcoming talks and lectures. I found that while most practitioners of dharma religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism) readily espouse mutual respect, there is considerable resistance from the Abrahamic faiths.

Soon afterwards, at the United Nation's Millennium Religion Summit in 2000, the Hindu delegation led by Swami Dayananda Saraswati insisted that in the official draft the term "tolerance" be replaced with "mutual respect." Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict), who led the Vatican delegation, strongly objected to this. After all, if religions deemed "heathen" were to be officially respected, there would be no justification for converting their adherents to Christianity.

The matter reached a critical stage and some serious fighting erupted. The Hindu side held firm that the time had come for the non-Abrahamic religions to be formally respected as equals at the table and not just tolerated by the Abrahamic religions. At the very last minute, the Vatican blinked and the final resolution did call for "mutual respect." However, within a month, the Vatican issued a new policy stating that while "followers of other religions can receive divine grace, it is also certain that objectively speaking they are in a gravely deficient situation in comparison with those who, in the Church, have the fullness of the means of salvation." Many liberal Christians condemned this policy, yet it remains the Vatican's official position.

My experiments in proposing mutual respect have also involved liberal Muslims. Soon after Sept. 11, 2001, in a radio interview in Dallas, I explained why mutual respect among religions is better than tolerance. One caller, identified as a local Pakistani community leader, congratulated me and expressed complete agreement. For her benefit, I elaborated that in Hinduism we frequently worship images of the divine, may view the divine as feminine, and that we believe in reincarnation. I felt glad that she had agreed to respect all this, and I clarified that "mutual respect" merely means that I am respected for my faith, with no requirement for others to adopt or practice it. I wanted to make sure she knew what she had agreed to respect and wasn't merely being politically correct. The woman hung up.

In 2007, I was invited to an event in Delhi where a visiting delegation from Emory University was promoting their newly formed Inter-Religious Council as a vehicle to achieve religious harmony. In attendance was Emory's Dean of the Chapel and Religious Life, who happens to be an ordained Lutheran minister. I asked her if her work on the Inter-Religious Council was consistent and compatible with her preaching as a Lutheran minister, and she confidently replied that it was. I then asked: "Is it Lutheran doctrine merely to 'tolerate' other religions or also to respect them, and by respect I mean acknowledging them as legitimate religions and equally valid paths to God"? She replied that this was "an important question," one that she had been "thinking about," but that there are "no easy answers."

It is disingenuous for any faith leader to preach one thing to her flock while representing something contradictory to naive outsiders. The idea of "mutual respect" poses a real challenge to Christianity, which insists that salvation is only possible by grace transmitted exclusively through Jesus. Indeed, Lutheran teaching stresses this exclusivity! These formal teachings of the church would make it impossible for the Dean to respect Hinduism, as opposed to tolerating it.

Unwilling to settle for ambiguity, I continued with my questions: "As a Lutheran minister, how do you perceive Hindu murtis (sacred images)? Are there not official injunctions in your teachings against such images?" "Do you consider Krishna and Shiva to be valid manifestations of God or are they among the 'false gods'?" "How do you see the Hindu Goddess in light of the church's claim that God is masculine?" The Dean deftly evaded every one of these questions.

Only a minority of Christians agree with the idea of mutual respect while fully understanding what it entails. One such person is Janet Haag, editor of Sacred Journey, a Princeton-based multi-faith journal. In 2008, when I asked her my favorite question -- "What is your policy on pluralism?" -- she gave the predictable response: "We tolerate other religions." This prompted me to explain mutual respect in Hinduism wherein each individual has the freedom to select his own personal deity (ishta-devata, not to be confused with polytheism) and pursue a highly individualized spiritual path (sva-dharma). Rather than becoming defensive or evasive, she explored this theme in her editorial in the next issue:

"In the course of our conversation about effective interfaith dialog, [Rajiv Malhotra] pointed out that we fall short in our efforts to promote true peace and understanding in this world when we settle for tolerance instead of making the paradigm shift to mutual respect. His remarks made me think a little more deeply about the distinctiveness between the words 'tolerance' and 'respect,' and the values they represent."

Haag explained that the Latin origin of "tolerance" refers to enduring and does not convey mutual affirmation or support: "[The term] also implicitly suggests an imbalance of power in the relationship, with one of the parties in the position of giving or withholding permission for the other to be." The Latin word for respect, by contrast, "presupposes we are equally worthy of honor. There is no room for arrogance and exclusivity in mutual respect."


Related News On Huffington Post:

More News Posts:  « First   Prev  1  2  Next   Last » 


 






























Read more at www.huffingtonpost.com
 

Software Developer: Even the Vatican is a Pirate

Amplify’d from www.zeropaid.com
Software Developer: Even the Vatican is a Pirate
avast

AVAST Software says only 1.8% of people using its Avast! antivirus program have paid for a user license, and that the original 14 – the only ones it’s sold – have been used in over 200 countries ranging from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe – even Vatican City.

AVAST Software is trying to convert pirates into paying customers after watching its Avast! antivirus program balloon to 774,651 active users on the backs of just 14 legal user licenses.

The news isn’t seen as a threat to Avast! which claims that it has “always prided itself” on the fact that 80% of new customers have been recommended the program by “satisfied friends” and sees the new users as a chance for additional growth.

“We made a decision to see just how viral this one license for avast! Pro Antivirus could be,” said Vince Steckler, CEO of AVAST Software. “The answer is ‘very’. Now we are in the process of converting these pirates over to legal products.”

Avast! says the irony is that license codes for its antivirus program were found on the very type of sites that the software is supposed to protect users from.

“We found our license code at a number of warez sites around the globe,” added Steckler. “There is a paradox in computer users looking for ‘free’ antivirus programs at locations with a known reputation for spreading malware.”

Here’s a breakdown of the countries with the most number of pirated copies in a list it dubs the “Top Dirty Dozen”:


  1. Russia

  2. Mexico

  3. Brazil

  4. Italy

  5. Spain

  6. USA

  7. India

  8. Philippines

  9. France

  10. Ukraine

  11. Argentina

  12. Thailand

Avast said that two PCs located within the Vatican were also using unlicensed copies.

The news is really much ado about nothing, Avast! seemingly using the whole affair to promote its antivirus program, but it is interesting to learn that even the Vatican has pirates in its midst.

Stay tuned.

jared@zeropaid.com

Read more at www.zeropaid.com
 

Vatican in talks with PLO to establish juridical accord

Amplify’d from www.catholicculture.org
Vatican in talks with PLO to establish juridical accord

The Vatican has resumed diplomatic talks with the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), aimed at securing the legal status of Church institutions on Palestinian territory.


The talks follow up on a “basic agreement” reached with the PLO in 2000. For years the Holy See has been engaged in separate talks with the state of Israel, hoping to establish the same sort of juridical accord.


The current round of talks was held at the PLO headquarters in Ramallah. Msgr. Ettore Balestero, the Vatican undersecretary for Relations with States, headed the Holy See’s delegation.

Read more at www.catholicculture.org