ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

High-school hunter faces expulsion over gun locked in trunk

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

High-school hunter faces expulsion over gun locked in trunk

'She possibly will have her life derailed because of ... irrational zero-tolerance policy'

By Bob Unruh




© 2010 WorldNetDaily


Demarie DeReu

A teenage hunter in Montana is facing a school hearing in a few days that could derail her college plans, career hopes and even risk her identification as a "domestic terrorist" after she inadvertently parked in a school parking lot with a hunting rifle locked in a case inside her car trunk.

The report on the situation is coming from Gary Marbut of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, who told WND he was contacted by the student's mother.

The student and her mother were not available for immediate comment because of job and school schedules, and multiple WND calls to the Columbia Falls school district did not generate a response. In fact, the district office and the high school both told WND to call the other office for comment.

But Marbut told WND that the student, Demarie DeReu, will be facing a hearing on Monday at which the local school board could expel her.

"She will possibly have her life derailed because a bunch of school idiots insist that she must be subject to an irrational, 'zero tolerance' policy about guns in schools that does not countenance lack of bad intent. The theory that people with malice will be intimidated into good conduct if people without malice are punished in lieu of them is idiocy at its finest," he said in his written documentation of the situation.

He said DeReu, 16, is an honor roll student, a member of the Columbia Falls High School student council and a varsity cheerleader.

She's also a hunter.

"Although she had no intent to break any rules or laws, or harm anyone, Demarie is at risk of having her college education derailed and maybe even being identified forever as a domestic terrorist," Marbut reported.

It was over Thanksgiving that she went hunting with family and friends, but when she returned home forgot her unloaded hunting rifle was cased and locked in the trunk of her car.

She later parked in the school parking lot but when she heard a "contraband dog" was to be working the lot, she remembered her unloaded rifle and volunteered the information to school officials.

"The controlling Montana law about this is 20-5-202, M.C.A., which says about expulsion for bringing guns 'to school,' '... the trustees may authorize the school administration to modify the requirement for expulsion of a student on a case-by-case basis.' Further, 'to school' is not defined in 20-5-2-202, but is at 45-8-361, M.C.A. as '... in a school building.' Demarie's hunting rifle was cased and locked in the trunk of her car in the parking lot, but not 'in a school building,'" Marbut wrote.

In fact, Montana law specifies that "a student who is determined to have brought a firearm to school under this subsection must be expelled from school for a period of not less than 1 year, except that the trustees may authorize the school administration to modify the requirement for expulsion of a student on a case-by-case basis."

State law also makes multiple references to banning any "weapon" from being "in a school building."

The student was fulfilling an assignment for his Communications 140 class that required him to discuss a "relevant issue in the media" when he and two other students on a team chose to talk about school violence, including recent events such as the 2007 shootings that left nearly three dozen people dead at Virginia Tech University.

Wahlberg made the point during his Oct. 3, 2008, class presentation that if students were allowed to carry concealed weapons on campus, the violence could have been stopped earlier. He discussed the concept of college campus gun-free zones.

That evening, the Recorder said, Wahlberg got a call from campus police officers who "requested" his presence at their station. When he arrived, officers listed firearms that were registered to him and asked him where they were.

Apparently his professor, Paula Anderson, had filed a campus police department complaint about his speech. Police officers reported she said students were "scared and uncomfortable" during his presentation.

Marbut has also been active of late in the campaign for the Montana Firearms Freedom Act, a law that simply states guns made, sold and kept in the state are exempt from federal regulations. That idea already has been copied by seven other states, and dozens of others are considering it.

The court fight over whether it can be enforced is pending before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Bob Unruh is a news editor for WorldNetDaily.com.
Read more at www.wnd.com
 

E pluribus buffoonum? Congress slams Obama

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

E pluribus buffoonum? Congress slams Obama

Lawmakers say president's omitting of God undercuts American history

OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL

By Bob Unruh




© 2010 WorldNetDaily


Members of the Congressional Prayer Caucus have written to President Obama asking him to correct a speech he gave in Indonesia incorrectly replacing the nation's motto of "In God We Trust" with "E pluribus unum."

The letter also cites a series of situations in which Obama has failed to include the reference to the "Creator" when quoting the Declaration of Independence.

WND has reported on numerous situations where the president quotations have left out references to God or the Creator.

In the newest development, U.S. Rep. J. Randy Forbes of Virginia and 42 bipartisan members of the Congressional Prayer Caucus have dispatched a letter over Obama's statement to a Jakarta audience that "E Pluribus unum" is the national motto.

Actually, it's "In God We Trust."

"For the president of the United States to incorrectly state something as foundational as our national motto in another country is unacceptable," said Forbes. "The president is the primary representative of our nation to the world, and whether mistake or intention, his actions cast aside an integral part of American society."

He said, "President Reagan once warned that 'If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.'"

It was during Obama's expedition to the Far East when he went to Jakarta on Nov. 10.

I believe that the history of both America and Indonesia should give us hope. It is a story written into our national mottos. In the United States, our motto is E pluribus unum – out of many, one. Bhinneka Tunggal Ika – unity in diversity. We are two nations, which have traveled different paths. Yet our nations show that hundreds of millions who hold different beliefs can be united in freedom under one flag. And we are now building on that shared humanity – through young people who will study in each other's schools; through the entrepreneurs forging ties that can lead to greater prosperity; and through our embrace of fundamental democratic values and human aspirations.

The letter explains that "In God We Trust" has been foundational throughout the history of the United States, from presidential proclamations to engravings in both House and Senate chambers. In 1956, Congress passed and President Eisenhower signed into law establishing "In God We Trust" as the official national motto of the United States.








White House text of Obama stating national motto is "E pluribus unum"



"'E pluribus unum' is not our national motto," the letter, dated yesterday, said. "As members of the Congressional Prayer Cuacus, a bipartisan group of members of the United States House of Representatives, we are dedicated to preserving America's religious heritage and protecting our religious liberty."

Signing the document were Reps. J. Randy Forbes of Virginia, Mike McIntyre of North Carolina, Paul Broun of Georgia, Steve King of Iowa, John Shadegg of Arizona, Louie Gohmert of Texas, Donald Manzullo of Illinois, John Boozman of Arkansas, Joseph Pitts of Pennsylvania, David Reichert of Washington, Gregg Harper of Mississippi, Jason Chaffetz of Utah, Robert Aderholt of Alabama, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Glenn Thompson of Pennsylvania, Steve Austria of Ohio, Jeff Miller of Florida, Mike Pence of Indiana, Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington, Scott Garrett of New Jersey, Joe Wilson of South Carolina, Doug Lamborn of Colorado, John Kline of Minnesota, Phil Roe of Tennessee, Peter Roskam of Illinois, John Carter of Texas, K. Michael Conaway of Texas, W. Todd Akin of Missouri, Zach Wamp of Tennessee, Randy Neugebauer of Texas, Todd Tiahrt of Kansas, Robert Wittman of Virginia, Vernon Ehlers of Michigan, Tom Price of Georgia, Spencer Bachus of Alabama, Roscoe Bartlett of Maryland, Mike Rogers of Alabama, Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, Thaddeus McCotter of Michigan, Trent Franks of Arizona, Phil Gingrey of Georgia and Michele Bachmann of Minnesota,

The letter also noted that on Oct. 18 during a fundraiser Obama omitted the "Creator" from a reference to the Declaration of Independence.

"Once may be a mistake. But twice is a pattern. These omissions and inaccuracies are a part of a larger pattern we are seeing with the president where he is inaccurately reflecting America and undercutting important parts of our nation's history," said Forbes. "Trust in God is embedded in the fabric of society and history in the United States.

"If we allow these threads to be pulled, we will begin to unravel the very freedoms that birthed America," he said.

It was martial arts champion, actor and WND columnist Chuck Norris who noted Obama actually has omitted "Creator" seven times in just the past few months:

His research lists the following:

  • On Oct. 21, 2010, at a rally for Sen. Murray in Seattle, Wash.:


    "None of us would be here if it weren't for that extraordinary leap of faith that had been taken. Thirteen colonies deciding to start a revolution based on an idea that had never been tried before – a government of and by and for the people. A government based on the simple proposition that all men are created equal. That we're endowed with certain inalienable rights."


  • On Oct. 18, 2010, at a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee dinner in Rockville, Md.:


    "It has to do with this idea that was started by 13 colonies that decided to throw off the yoke of an empire, and said, 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that each of us are endowed with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.'"


  • On Oct. 17, 2010 at a reception for Gov. Ted Strickland in Chagrin Fall, Ohio.:


    "The idea of America has never been easy. The notion of 13 colonies coming together and overthrowing the greatest empire in the world, and then drafting a document that says, we find these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights – that's hard."


  • On Sept. 22, 2010, at a Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee dinner in New York, N.Y.:


    "And what was sustaining us was that sense that – that North Star, that sense that, you know what, if we stay true to our values, if we believe that all people are created equal and everybody is endowed with certain inalienable rights and we're going to make those words live, and we're going to give everybody opportunity, everybody a ladder into the middle class,…"


  • On Sept. 15, 2010, at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute's 33rd annual awards gala in Washington, D.C.:


    "But over the centuries, what eventually bound us together – what made us all Americans – was not a matter of blood, it wasn't a matter of birth. It was faith and fidelity to the shared values that we all hold so dear. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights: life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness."


  • On Sept. 11, 2010, at the Pentagon Memorial in Arlington, Va.:


    "For our cause is just. Our spirit is strong. Our resolve is unwavering. Like generations before us, let us come together today and all days to affirm certain inalienable rights, to affirm life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness."


  • On Sept. 10, 2010, at the president's press conference at the White House:


    "With respect to the mosque in New York, I think I've been pretty clear on my position here, and that is, is that this country stands for the proposition that all men and women are created equal; that they have certain inalienable rights – one of those inalienable rights is to practice their religion freely."

When WND's correspondent at the White House, Les Kinsolving, raised the question about the omissions, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said, "I haven't seen the comments, Lester, but I can assure you the president believes in the Declaration of Independence."

In a second commentary on the subject, Chuck Norris continued, "The truth is, if you want an accurate religious history of America, you're no longer going to get it from our president, our progressive society or secular schools, at least not without unbiased trained teachers or the induction of a religious curriculum that hasn't tampered and twisted history."

At the time the declaration was adopted, however, the concept of all being created "equal" was a rare idea.

The Declaration states: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."







Original wording from Declaration of Independence

One of the incidents is on tape, with the reference appearring shortly past the 22-minute mark:

Other speeches, with the reference missing, followed.

Other references to America's Christian heritage have been excised at the home of the Liberty Bell, the Supreme Court and even the Washington Monument.

Chaplain Todd DuBord, who works with Chuck Norris' multiple organizations, has documented the ongoing trend at his National Treasures website.

If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WorldNetDaily poll.

Bob Unruh is a news editor for WorldNetDaily.com.
Read more at www.wnd.com
 

Colombia’s ambassador to the Vatican interrogated over wiretaps

Colombia’s ambassador to the Vatican interrogated over wiretaps

Adriaan Alsema

Colombia news - Velasquez

Cesar Mauricio Velasquez, press secretary to former President Alvaro Uribe, was interrogated by public prosecutors about his alleged role in the wiretapping of government opponents.

Velasquez, who is currently Colombia's ambassador to the Vatican, arrived at the prosecutor general's main office in Bogota where he was summoned to respond to accusations from DAS officials that he was personally informed about the illegal wiretapping of Supreme Court judges, journalists, politicians and human rights organizations by state intelligence agency DAS.

The scandal caused international outrage and has led to Uribe's former chief of staff and one DAS director, who fled to Panama to seek asylum, being barred from public office.

After PayPal, MasterCard Dumps Wikileaks Rev. 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell

After PayPal, MasterCard Dumps Wikileaks Rev. 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell

If you don't have approval of the beast, you can not buy or sell!

By Priyanka Banerjee





After Paypal and Swiss authorities closed the Wikileaks' accounts, Mastercard has followed suit and refused to provide financial services to the whistle-blower website.

“MasterCard is taking action to ensure that Wikileaks can no longer accept MasterCard–branded products,” said a spokesperson for MasteCard Worlwide, according to the CNET website.

MasterCard said it was cutting off payments because WikiLeaks is engaging in illegal activity.

"MasterCard rules prohibit customers from directly or indirectly engaging in or facilitating any action that is illegal," spokesman Chris Monteiro said.

In the last few days Wikileaks witnessed a systematic attack on their revenue sources as the Swiss authorities closed a bank account used by WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and and Paypal dropped them last Friday.

It is reported that Assange is going to need somewhere between $133,000 to $265,000 to post for bail to keep him out of a British cooler.

Moreover, the incoming chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Peter King (R-N.Y.) wants Wikileaks listed as a 'terrorist' organization, which would prohibit U.S. banks from processing payments and make it a crime for anyone to provide "material support or resources" to the group.

Hitler's T-4 Euthanasia Program forcibly sterilized hereditarily deaf/HoH

Wikileaks' Julian Assange Arrested in London

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Wikileaks' Julian Assange Arrested in LondonAs expected, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange was arrested by the Metropolitan Police in London today on a European Arrest Warrant for sexual assault charges filed by two women in Sweden. Assange is due to appear in court later today.


Send an email to Jeff Neumann, the author of this post, at jeff@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Chicago Police Will Taser Just About Anyone

Amplify’d from gawker.com

Chicago Police Will Taser Just About AnyoneOver the last year, Chicago police have used tasers on people 683 times — an increase from just 197 times in 2009. That's because the police department more than doubled its taser arsenal, and stopped investigating every taser-related incident.

In an annual report released today by the Independent Police Review Authority, the department's decision last year to increase taser use is said to be making people safer, as well as helping to "defuse" tense situations. And really, what better way to break up an argument than by electrocuting someone? According to Chicago's WGN News:


As a result, the agency said it has decided against investigating every time an officer uses a Taser, saying the hundreds of incidents were "overwhelming" its resources. Instead, it will do so only if allegations of misconduct are made, serious injury or death resulted, or a minor or senior citizen was targeted.


So basically the only way for a police taser incident to be investigated in Chicago is if someone dies, or if children or old people are fried by a trigger happy cop. At this rate, pretty soon they'll be tasering people for jaywalking.

[via FARK; Image via AP]


Send an email to Jeff Neumann, the author of this post, at jeff@gawker.com.

Read more at gawker.com
 

Petition demands Senate stop push for social experimentation in armed forces

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

Say NO to Congress mandating open 'gays' in military

Petition demands Senate stop push for social experimentation in armed forces


© 2010 WorldNetDaily

Although top military leaders and troop surveys are offering compelling evidence that congressional repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" will severely impact recruiting, retention, unit cohesion and morale, and even – in the words of the nation's Marine Corps commandant – cause "disruption of the successful execution of our current combat mission," Democrat senators are intent on abolishing the armed forces' policy on homosexuality that has been part of military culture and discipline since the days of George Washington.

But now you can tell Congress that George Washington actually knew what he was doing when he determined that homosexuality in a team of fighters disrupts morale, damages unit cohesion and hurts military readiness.

WND has launched a petition urging President Obama and members of Congress to cease trying to "overturn the proven and time-tested warrior culture of the finest fighting force in history": 

The petition says:


To: Barack Obama and all members of the United States Congress


Whereas, today's lame-duck Congress, recently repudiated by voters for pushing a progressive-left agenda on America, is nevertheless attempting in the last few days of its legislative session to impose – during wartime – a radical social experiment on the nation's armed forces by mandating inclusion of open homosexuals;


Whereas, a Pentagon survey of personnel in the various armed services shows that repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is opposed by large numbers of America's fighting men and women and would likely create a major retention problem at a time when the military is already shorthanded;


Whereas, Sen. John McCain has warned, based on the Pentagon's statistics, that 264,600 men and women would likely "leave the military earlier than they had planned" if open homosexuality is allowed, and some military analysts say the number leaving could well be double that, thereby endangering the viability of America's all-voluntary military;


Whereas, in another poll conducted by the Military Times – asking "If the 'Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell' policy is overturned and gays are allowed to serve openly, how would you respond?" – nearly 10 percent said, "I would not re-enlist or extend my service" while another 14 percent said, "I would consider not re-enlisting or extending my service";



Whereas, the U.S. military, ever since the era of George Washington, has held that open homosexuals are disruptive to morale, unit cohesion and military readiness;


Whereas, that view is confirmed by military leaders today, including Marine Corps commandant Gen. James Amos who recently testified that a majority of combat Marines oppose permitting open homosexuality in their ranks, that repealing current policy "would absolutely have an impact on combat units" and that "the potential exists for disruption of the successful execution of our current combat mission should repeal be implemented at this time";


Whereas, over 1,100 retired generals and admirals – who understand better than anyone the real-world repercussions of mandating inclusion of open homosexuals in the intensely tight-knit, close-quarters environment of soldiers at war – have signed a petition urging retention of the current policy and opposing repeal of "Don't Ask Don't Tell":

The petition goes on to demand that senators honor the "clear wishes of the voters they serve, as well as the wishes of the U.S. military, by immediately ceasing … efforts to overturn the proven and time-tested warrior culture of the finest fighting force in history."

"If 12.6 percent of the military left earlier, that translates into 264,600 men and women who would leave the military earlier than they had planned … Do you think that's a good idea to replace 265,000 troops … in a time of war?" he asked.

Military analyst Bob Maginnis, a retired Army lieutenant colonel and senior fellow for national security at the Family Research Council, went further.

"Twelve-point-six percent is just the people who said they would leave," Maginnis warned. "If you add in the number who said they 'might' leave, you get 23.7 percent. That would be 528,000, when you count both active duty and reserves.

"And that's only if you trust their numbers," Maginnis continued. "They have a real problem with their numbers. It's skewed toward noncombatants, and the Air Force had much larger proportional participation than the Army, so the numbers are totally unreliable.

At the same time McCain's comments were made, commanders of the Army, Air Force and Marines cautioned that change a sudden change to allow open homosexuals in Congress would cause problems.

It was Maginnis who explained that the military's "survey" about homosexuality in the ranks failed.

"I don't think people understand how they have spun these numbers. Not only is the survey biased, the way they combined their percentages is skewed. They say 50 or 55 percent of the troops support repeal, but that's not true. The big slice of that 55 percent is 'mixed', some positive, some negative." The truth is, it was 30 percent negative, and 15 or 20 percent positive."

Maginnis said the results of the survey consistently show that two service members oppose DADT repeal for every supporter.

Marine Corps commandant Gen. James Amos acknowledged that a clear majority of combat Marines oppose permitting open homosexuality in the ranks.

"Their message is that the potential exists for disruption of the successful execution of our current combat mission should repeal be implemented at this time," said Amos.

Further, such changes would put any Christian chaplain in an impossible situation.

"If you have strongly held religious beliefs you'll have cognitive dissonance, and it'll be very difficult to overcome. The military is ignoring privacy concerns, and you'll be told you'll have to room with a homosexual. Your commander will tell you that you will never be propositioned and your roommate will never leer at you, so your deeply held religious beliefs will be of no consequence," Maginnis said.

"Ever since George Washington the military has been programmed to believe homosexuals are disruptive to morale and unit cohesiveness, and are a readiness problem. You have to expunge all those negative thoughts you have about homosexuality and replace them with what you're told by the chain of command about what's right and wrong," he warned.

Sign WND's petition demanding Congress stop its plan to repeal "don't ask, don't tell."

Read more at www.wnd.com
 

University: Dump Christian beliefs on homosexuality, or else

Amplify’d from www.wnd.com

University: Dump Christian beliefs on homosexuality, or else

Demands student get re-educated, attend 'pride' event

BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS

By Drew Zahn




© 2010 WorldNetDaily








Jen Keeton

Augusta State University graduate student Jen Keeton alleges school officials demand she be re-educated in morality, giving her the choice of giving up her Christian beliefs on homosexuality or being expelled from the school's counseling program.

But now, after months of battling the university in court, a pair of free-speech organizations have joined her in the fight.

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and the National Association of Scholars have filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, asserting it a violation of the First Amendment for the Georgia university's officials to require Keeton's beliefs be "influenced" by remedial sensitivity training or face expulsion.

According to a complaint filed against the school earlier this year, school officials demanded Keeton, 24, go through a "remediation" program after she asserted homosexuality is a behavioral choice, not a "state of being" as a professor said.

Specifically, the remediation program was to include "sensitivity training" on homosexual issues, additional outside study on literature promoting homosexuality and the plan that she attend a "gay pride parade" and report on it.

"Besides violating Keeton's own First Amendment rights," writes University of California Los Angeles law professor Eugene Volokh in the brief, "the university's retaliation also sent a powerful message to other students: If you express views like Keeton's, prepare to suffer the same consequences – prepare to incur many hours of extra obligations, and to put yourself at risk of expulsion."

Keeton's original lawsuit, filed by attorneys working with the Alliance Defense Fund, asserted the school cannot violate the Constitution by demanding that a person's beliefs be changed.

University "faculty have promised to expel Miss Keeton from the graduate Counselor Education program, not because of poor academic showing or demonstrated deficiencies in clinical performance, but simply because she has communicated both inside and outside the classroom that she holds to Christian ethical convictions on matters of human sexuality and gender identity," the law firm explained.

Keeton's own e-mail response to the faculty members who allegedly were pressuring her to adopt a pro-homosexual belief system defines the dispute.

"At times you said that I must alter my beliefs because they are unethical. ... Other times you said that I can keep my beliefs so long as they are only personal and I don't believe that anyone else should believe like me. But that is just another way of saying that I must alter my beliefs, because my beliefs are about absolute truth. ... In order to finish the counseling program you are requiring me to alter my objective beliefs and also to commit now that if I ever may have a client who wants me to affirm their decision to have an abortion or engage in gay, lesbian or transgender behavior, I will do that. I can't alter my biblical beliefs, and I will not affirm the morality of those behaviors in a counseling situation," she wrote.

According to court documents, Keeton faces the "remediation" requirement because she supposedly (1) "voiced disagreement in several class discussions and in written assignments with the gay and lesbian 'lifestyle,'" (2) "stated in one paper that she believes GLBTQ 'lifestyles' to be identity confusion," (3) "relayed [to another student] her interest in conversion therapy for GLBTQ populations" and (4) "tried to convince other students to support and believe her views."

School authorities cited the American Counseling Association's code of ethics and said students would be required to adopt its provisions to obtain a degree in counseling.

Faculty members, therefore, had demanded Keeton "attend at least three workshops … which emphasize … diversity training sensitive toward working with GLBTQ populations." They also wanted her to "develop" her knowledge of homosexuality by reading 10 articles and increasing her exposure to homosexuals and lesbians by attending "the Gay Pride Parade."

"Simply put, the university is imposing thought reform," said ADF Senior Counsel David French. "Abandoning one's own religious beliefs should not be a precondition at a public university for obtaining a degree. This type of leftist zero-tolerance policy is in place at far too many universities, and it must stop. Jennifer's only crime was to have the beliefs that she does."

He added that a public university student "shouldn't be threatened with expulsion for being a Christian and refusing to publicly renounce her faith, but that's exactly what's happening here."

Keeton's original request for an injunction preventing Augusta State from expelling her over refusal to comply with the remediation program was denied in August by U.S. District Judge J. Randal Hall.

"[T]his is not a case pitting Christianity against homosexuality," Hall wrote in his opinion. "Matters of educational policy should be left to educators, and it is not the proper role of federal judges to second guess an educator's professional judgment."

He added, "Whether I would have imposed the remediation plan, or what I would have included in the plan itself, is not the question, for the Supreme Court instructs that educators, not federal judges, are the ones that choose among pedagogical approaches."

The FIRE and NAS friend-of-the-court brief explains, however, "A university does have great latitude in deciding what all of its students in a particular program or course must learn. But it does not have such latitude in imposing special curricular burdens on students who express certain views, whether anti-homosexuality, anti-war, pro-gun rights, anti-religious, or whatever else."

The brief concludes, "Unless the district court's decision is reversed, it threatens to become a road map for other public universities that want to restrict a wide range of speech (not at all limited to anti-homosexuality speech) by a wide range of students (not at all limited to counseling students)."

Drew Zahn is a news editor for WorldNetDaily. Follow Drew on Twitter and Facebook.
Read more at www.wnd.com
 

Police: 12-year-old Virginia girl kidnapped; her mother's body found

Amplify’d from www.cnn.com

Police: 12-year-old Virginia girl kidnapped; her mother's body found

By the CNN Wire Staff

(CNN) -- Police issued an Amber Alert for a 12-year-old girl who they suspect has been kidnapped after finding her mother dead inside a Salem, Virginia, home.

Brittany Mae Smith was last seen "several days ago," according to a Roanoke County statement issued Monday. Police launched a search for Jeffrey Scott Easley, 32, whom authorities describe as a friend of the dead mother.

"Police have said that the young lady is in extreme danger," said Teresa Hamilton Hall, public information director for Roanoke County.

Roanoke County police went to the Salem residence around 9:30 a.m. Monday after concerned co-workers of Tina Smith, the girl's mother, contacted them. Police found the 41-year-old woman's body inside, and authorities said they were investigating the death as a possible homicide.

Police soon got information that Brittany Smith's whereabouts were unknown, leading them to issue the statewide alert.

"We found out pretty quickly that (Brittany) had not shown up for school. Nobody seemed to know where she was. We're concerned that her disappearance is going to be, at least a good possibility, it has something to do with the homicide," Roanoke County police Lt. Chuck Mason said, according to CNN affiliate WSET-TV of Lynchburg, Virginia.

Virginia's Amber Alert website noted early Monday evening that Easley's car, a 2000 red Chevrolet sport utility vehicle, has been found. But authorities are still looking for Tina Smith's vehicle, a silver 2005 Dodge Neon four-door sedan with Virginia license plates.

Easley, a 265-pound white male, is 5 feet, 11 inches tall, has brown hair and hazel eyes, the Amber Alert says.

Brittany Smith is 5 feet tall, weighs 100 pounds, and has straight brown hair and brown eyes.

Hall said authorities don't yet have a specific search area as they are uncertain which direction Easley might be heading or how far he might have gotten. They have asked anyone with information to call 911 or Roanoke County police at 540-777-8641.

CNN's Greg Botelho and Alexis Weed contributed to this report.


RELATED TOPICS

Read more at www.cnn.com