ARTICLES - HOT OFF THE FAGGOT

Ethiopian monasticism struggles following Marxist nationalization of land

Amplify’d from www.catholicculture.org
Ethiopian monasticism struggles following Marxist nationalization of land

The Ethiopian Orthodox Church is struggling to maintain its monastic traditions in the wake of the Marxist nationalizaton of monastic properties in the late twentieth century.


“Under Marxist Derg rule, which lasted until 1991, the government seized and redistributed church-owned land,” ONE Magazine reports. “Monasteries, which traditionally operated relatively large farms, were forced to forfeit much of their property and, as a result, lost their economic sustainability. Stripped of their resources, monks and nuns also surrendered their vital roles as producers, employers, educators and leaders in their communities.”


0.8% of Ethiopia’s 77.2 million people are Catholic, according to Vatican statistics; 51% are Ethiopian Orthodox, 33% are Muslim, and 10% are Protestant. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church ceased to be in communion with the Holy See following the Council of Chalcedon in 451.

Read more at www.catholicculture.org
 

Why haven't you heard about THIS papal quote? Homosexuality is incompatible with the priestly vocation.

Amplify’d from www.catholicculture.org
Why haven't you heard about THIS papal quote?
By Phil Lawler

If you want to drum up controversy on the basis of one quote pulled out of the Pope's book-length interview Light of the World, how about this one, found on page 152:

Homosexuality is incompatible with the priestly vocation.

Unlike the now-famous quotation about condom use, this sentence isn't pulled out of context. The Pope isn't merely speculating. He isn't raising a possible objection or exception to his own argument. His point is clear. 

Pope Benedict reminds his interviewer: "The Congregation for Education issued a decision a few years ago to the effect that homosexual candidates cannot become priests..."

Oh, sure; we all remember that decision. As soon as it came out, American seminary administrators rushed to "clarify," saying that the Vatican intended that rule to apply only to active homosexuals. The Pope thinks otherwise; he speaks of homosexual orientation, not homosexual activity. He explains that homosexuals cannot become priests "...because their sexual orientation estranges them from the proper sense of paternity, from the intrinsic nature of priestly being." 

This isn't a trivial concern, the Pope adds:

The greatest attention is needed here in order to prevent the intrusion of this kind of ambiguity and to head off a situation where the celibacy of priests would practically end up being identified with the tendency to homosexuality.

Somehow this passage of the book has, to date, escaped the attention of commentators. It does come 34 pages later. Maybe they'll get there soon.

Read more at www.catholicculture.org
 

Basic Catholic Rules On Indulgences

Amplify’d from www.dfwcatholic.org

Basic Catholic Rules On Indulgences

“I remember indulgences from when I was a kid!” Many people mention this, and the people who do always have questions.


Where Has The Time Gone?

When we learned about indulgences twenty, thirty, forty or more years ago, we remember how the nuns explained it to us: doing an indulgence got us time off purgatory. We didn’t know exactly what that meant, but it sounded like a good deal.


God bless the nuns, but they either deliberately misled us because they didn’t think we would understand the real explanation, or they didn’t know the real explanation themselves. Prior to Vatican II, all indulgences had a certain amount of time associated with them – saying this prayer or doing that deed was worth 300 days, or 10 years or somesuch. But the time listed was never meant to refer to time in Purgatory. It was a little more complicated than that.


Long, Long Ago…

You see, in the very early Church, the first 300 to 400 years, the sacrament of reconciliation was not celebrated as commonly as it is now. In fact, it was unusual to receive it as often as once every five or ten years. Everyone who entered the Church came in as adults – while the Church was happy to baptize children if the parents wanted, She spent most of her time teaching pagan adults the Faith.

If I were a pagan adult who was interested in becoming Christian, I would probably take between three and five solid years of instruction, being taught every day, practicing the Faith every day, having the community watch me practice every day. Everyone knew my name, and I would learn everyone’s name myself. Only after the whole community had seen me prepare and felt I was ready, only then would I be permitted to enter the Church.


The Church took this long because the bishop and the community wanted to make sure I really understood what I was getting into. They also wanted to make sure that I understood all the responsibilities I was undertaking. They wanted to see a real conversion in the way I approached the world, a real hunger for baptism and the washing away of sins.


Penance IS Purgation

What’s this got to do with indulgences? Well, once I was finally permitted to be baptized, the power of that baptism combined with the pre- and post-baptismal instruction was supposed to make me so solid in Christ Jesus that I would never commit another mortal sin.


Sure, I would be tempted – that went without saying. But I was not expected to commit any more mortal sins. I was an adult, I was giving my word to God that I had left that life of sin behind me, and God gave me His grace to empower me so that I would no longer succumb, so why would I sin?


And if I did commit a mortal sin, then I needed to show real remorse for it in order to demonstrate to the community that I had no plans to repeat the experience. So, if I had gone to confession in the early Church, this is the kind of penance I might receive: “Well, you’ve made a good confession,” the bishop might say, “so I will give you a light penance. For the next two years, you are not permitted to attend Mass or receive the Eucharist. Instead, you will spend every Sunday walking around the Church, praying the penitential Psalms while we are celebrating Mass.


Then, for the two years following that, you may attend Mass through the Gospel reading, but when all the unbaptized are ushered out of the Church after that Gospel reading, you will go with them and again walk about the courtyard praying the penitential Psalms.”


“If you do this faithfully, then for the two years following that, you are permitted to be present for the consecration, but you must be face down in front of the community, reciting the penitential Psalms.


And if all of this goes well and you continue to show true and deep remorse, then following this, you may be admitted to the Eucharist once again. Go in peace, my son.”


An eight or ten year penance was not at all uncommon. For certain sins, like murder or participation in abortion, you might be  told to perform penance for the rest of your life, not permitted to receive the Eucharist again until you lay dying.


A VERY Sweet Deal

So, the time periods associated with the indulgenced prayers were not meant to be time off purgatory after death, rather, they were indications that the Church had remitted the normal, early penance of 300 days or ten years in exchange for your saying this one prayer. She was promising to release to you the grace you would otherwise have had to spend a decade in prayer to win. Obviously, this was a pretty sweet deal. There was only one problem.


No one understood or seemed to remember the connection between the early penances and the current time values associated with indulgences. Instead, the faithful were getting a fairly silly understanding of how Purgatory and indulgences worked. Ultimately, after Vatican II, the Church threw up her hands and said, “Never mind the time periods. Every indulgence is just partial or plenary now. You can either win back for the world some of the grace you took out of it (partial) or all of the grace you took out of it.”


What Indulgences Count?

This leaves an obvious question. What do we do with all those old holy cards we have that say we get 300 days off? The Church also answered that question.

Since indulgences are matters of particular law, no prayer is indulgenced unless the Church says it is. Every generation or so, the Church releases a new handbook listing all the indulgences for which She opens the treasury of heaven.

These indulgences are listed in the Handbook of Indulgences, and that Handbook (aka Enchiridion) supercedes all previous rules. So, if you have an old holy card or book (like a Raccolta) that lists indulgences, none of those prayers carry the indulgence described unless that prayer also happens to be in the latest list from Rome.


And even if the prayer you are looking at is in the latest list, it no longer carries the indulgence the old list said it had. Now, it has only the indulgence – partial or plenary – that the Church has most recently assigned it. Don’t worry too much, though. All of the prayers have been retained with at least a partial indulgence. It’s only the plenary indulgences that may have been altered in a significant way.


So, if you want to do an indulgenced work or pray an indulgenced prayer, you have to have the latest handbook (currently, a translation of the 1999 edition) or you can use the prayers and acts conveniently described in the latest edition of the Beauty of Grace, Calendar of Indulgences 2010. We’ve gone through the book and laid out the rules in an easy-to-use calendar, so you don’t have to worry about all the details in the book. You can find it at www.bridegroompress.com



We hope you like it. We certainly enjoyed putting it together. Now, go and get some purgatory time out of the way.


Steve Kellmeyer

Bridegroom Press

Read more at www.dfwcatholic.org
 

Debating Tony Blair on faith

Debating Tony Blair on faith

Last week, atheist author Christopher Hitchens debated the merits of religion with former British prime minister Tony Blair, who converted to Catholicism after leaving office. Following are Hitchens' thoughts about the event. For Tony Blair's click here.

I am sometimes asked whether I ever get tired of debating the faithful. There are two reasons why I never do. The first is that this argument is at the root of all other arguments: constituting the essential underlay of differences about philosophy, cosmology, history, textual criticism and even medicine. The second is that I never know what my antagonist is going to say, or affirm, or claim to believe.

In any case, there was scant chance of being bored while contesting these matters with Tony Blair. But he did exemplify, to an unusually high degree, the tendency of modern believers to eclecticism and to the public presentation of what often turns out to be a virtually private or personal definition of religion. (I find this doubly odd in the case of a man who went to a lot of trouble to convert to one of history's more disciplined and rule-bound churches, at a time when its latest pope is striving to reinvigorate a highly traditionalist interpretation, but let that pass for now.)

One can't do everything with a motion for debate so panoptic that it contains the two words "religion" and "world." So I was decided to concentrate on exposing or at least undermining the two favorite "talking points" of the soft-centered spiritual. The first of these is their pretend-concession that, yes, terrible things have indeed been done, or even are done, "in the name of religion." The second is their peculiar idea that if you can change the subject to charitable donation by the faithful, you have somehow scored a point.

The claim that wickedness and stupidity has divine authority is not a claim made by religious fanatics who have hijacked (or in some amusing renditions "high-jacked") faith for their own purposes. Rather, the authority is found in texts that are the ancestral bedrock of religion and are asserted - because otherwise what is it to be "religious" in the first place, or at all? - to be in some way the word of god. I won't bore you again with the numerous graphic and horrible examples of this, such as the biblical warrants for slavery, genocide, land-theft, the murder of homosexuals and the subordination of women, or the famous Muslim hadith about the requirement to slay apostates. What about something ostensibly more mild? "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one cometh to the father except by me." Here we confront the inescapable tones of the exclusive fanatic, by whose poorly-reported teachings alone one may hope for salvation. And the punishments for declining this beautiful offer? Departure into everlasting fire. The rewards? An eternity of praise-giving. Unless Blair and people like him are willing to disown such sinister and totalitarian supernatural claims, they should stop saying that offenses occur "in the name of" their cherished beliefs. Rather, they should have the grace to agree that such offenses are innate and foundational.

I thought it was very decent of Tony Blair, after I had threatened to become repetitively tedious on this point, to concede it in almost so many words. Asked by a young questioner to say what had impressed each of us most in the arguments of the other - a chance to let the Socratic dialectic into the proceedings - he said that I was correct to maintain that the problem is indeed present in the original scriptures. (When it was my turn to answer, I cited some seductive elements of religion that he had not mentioned himself, so please see the transcript.)

As for religious charity and good works, this is not even a bad argument. Examined for a moment, it doesn't amount to an argument at all. Suppose you observe me debating with an opponent who catches me out in a logical fallacy or an apology for crimes against humanity, or both. Nothing daunted, I have my riposte all prepared. On the way to the symposium or panel, I announce as if proudly laying down my four aces, I handed a fifty dollar bill to a homeless person. Why, I even specified that ten per cent of my donation would be set aside to build a school where the man, and his children, could be taught my own beliefs as if they were true. Now try to tell me that my logic was unsound, or my ethical claims contradicted! When faith reduces you to this level of "debate" you should feel a distinct blush of shame. People tell me that Louis Farrakhan's "Nation of Islam" rescues young black men from narcotics. I tend to doubt the claim, but even if it were true it would not alter the fact that Farrakhan runs a crackpot racist cult centered on yet another supreme spiritual leader (all of these, you notice, often homicidally opposed to one another).

But without this dud poor-box standby, repeated in his contribution to this page, Blair would evidently feel naked. He did not answer my question about the millions of Africans who have been even further immiserated by the efforts of Roman Catholic "charitable missions" to deprive them of contraception. And to deprive them of it, moreover, in a time of plague that centers on sexual transmission. Indeed, he never rose with any robustness to defend his new allegiance, even though I challenged him on Cardinal Newman - whose beatification he recently helped sponsor - and on several recent instances of Vatican complicity in cruel and unusual doings. So at least he doesn't exhibit that most tiring of all phenomena; the zeal of the new convert.

I have several times written and said that atheist beliefs are compatible with all sorts of other beliefs as well. Ayn Rand, not all of whose work I admire, was an atheist. Leo Strauss, a philosopher justly admired by conservatives (and by me, when he writes about "Persecution and the Art of Writing") seems to have been without theistic belief. Some utilitarians like Peter Singer are unbelievers too. I am ready to believe that Mussolini was an atheist, though if that's true it's even more disgusting that the Vatican made such a pet of him, along with the Christian fascist dictators like Franco, Salazar, Pavelic and Tiso. The majority of public atheists and secularists in the West have a tendency to associate with a kind of ethical humanism or even leftism, but this is not necessary or entailed. So Blair was quite right to disagree with a position that I do not hold and have in fact never heard argued - that if religion vanished, all our evils and woes would dematerialize along with it. He made a small stab at another hastily-carpentered standby of the faith-based canon, about twentieth-century tyranny being atheistic, but his heart didn't quite seem to be in it. Everyone knows or should know what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf about doing the lord's work. And nobody can find any totalitarian text that says: we can do what we like, and everything is permitted to us, because we have no god on our side. The whole concept of supreme unalterable leadership, as Orwell wrote, is intrinsically theocratic.

That could have been a separate debate, which I am willing to have at any time or place and with any challenger. The same goes for another inexpensive point that is about to run out of traction: the pseudo-clever slogan about atheists being fundamentalists, too. Blair sometimes flirts with this trickery, but to his credit appears to be as ready to drop it as to pick it up. Perhaps somebody will one day identify a single proposition, whether in molecular biology or astrophysics or behavioral science, which any materialist or unbeliever would not discard if it were to be met by overpowering contrary evidence. But until that day dawns, the taunt doesn't even count as a nice try.

I am sure that neither side in this inescapable, vital argument was represented at its strongest in Toronto last Friday. Still, I would freely say that Tony Blair, a man who has recently had to endure a great deal of thuggery defamation, demonstrated qualities of sincerity, honesty and moral courage: capacities that he will I hope one day decide to deploy in a better cause.

By Christopher Hitchens
Read more at onfaith.washingtonpost.com
 

Do full body scanners violate right to privacy?

Minors in the U.K. are barred from undergoing full body scans. The scans violate the U.K.’s child pornography laws.

Amplify’d from arbiteronline.com

Do full body scanners violate right to privacy?

Posted by samantharoyce

COURTESY TSA

Many students are traveling during the holidays. They already have to look forward to long lines and time-consuming security checks.

Now, they will look forward to something else: full-body scanners that will peek under their clothing, using technology to essentially strip them naked.

Earlier this year, Rep. Phil Hart from Athol, Idaho, proposed bill HB 573 that would ban the scanners, called “whole-body imaging technology” in the bill. HB 573 passed in the Idaho House of Representatives but did not pass in the Senate.

The new scanners are causing an uproar among civil rights advocates and some religious communities.

“The government should enact procedures that pose the least threat to our civil liberties and are also proven to be effective,” the American Civil Liberties Union said Nov. 17. “Routine full body scanning, embarrassingly intimate patdowns and racial profiling do not fit those criteria.”

“I wouldn’t be comfortable with the scanners if I thought that they were a foolproof way of making sure nothing bad ever happened on an airplane again,” said Amanda Patchin, a graduate student of English literature from Boise. “It’s just too high a price to pay for security … We’ve gotten comfortable with having our freedoms infringed upon in the name of safety.”

The scanners are also a concern for people whose religion requires modesty and bodily privacy.

A British Muslim woman and her female friend traveling with her were prevented from boarding their flights at Manchester Airport in February 2010 after they refused to be scanned. The Muslim woman cited religious reasons for her refusal. The other woman cited medical reasons.

Muslims aren’t the only ones who are worried. Pope Benedict XVI recently expressed concern that the scanners may violate human dignity.

According to The Guardian, the pope said at a Vatican meeting that although detecting terrorists is important, “the primary asset to be safeguarded and treasured is the person, in his or her integrity.”

Feminists, the transgendered and the disabled are all worried about how these intimate body scans will affect them. Prosthetic limbs and other medical devices may show up as anomalies on the scanners. People with these items may have to undergo a detailed patdown in addition to being scanned.

Parents are also concerned about their children being scanned. Michelle Nemphos’s 12-year-old daughter was selected to undergo the scan while traveling with a friend’s family. She was not told she could opt out of the scan.

“Our daughter was scared and didn’t understand what was happening,” Nemphos told the St. Petersburg Times. “In essence they conducted a strip search on a 12-year-old girl without her parents present to advocate for her.”

Patchin is also uncomfortable with the thought of children undergoing these full body scans.

“I believe that the cutoff age (for being scanned) is something like 12,” Patchin said. “And I have two sons that are considerably younger than that. So if they were 12 years old I would not be comfortable with them being subjected to that either.”

Minors in the U.K. are barred from undergoing full body scans. The scans violate the U.K.’s child pornography laws.

In the U.S., scanners-as-pornography aren’t much of an issue yet. But in Nigeria, some security officials are using the scanners as an excuse to look at women’s near-naked bodies. This may be a concern for American students who will be traveling abroad during the holidays. Whether or not other countries face this problem is unknown.

For information and links to privacy resources, view the article online:

Short URL: http://arbiteronline.com/?p=58551

Read more at arbiteronline.com
 

Notre Dame charged with not taking girl's sexual assault allegation, and subsequent suicide, seriously

Amplify’d from www.americablog.com


Notre Dame charged with not taking girl's sexual assault allegation, and subsequent suicide, seriously


by

John Aravosis (DC)

A Catholic university overlooking a sex crime. It's not pedophilia, but still I bet someone in the Vatican is smiling.

It's a disgusting story. Read this and this.

It seems inconceivable that Notre Dame could complete even a preliminary investigation and conclude its player committed no wrongdoing between the time officials became aware of the allegation and the next football game, just a matter of days. Yet judging from the carefree tone of [Notre Dame football coach Brian] Kelly's comments Sunday and multiple conversations with people familiar with the case, that's exactly what happened.
In the months since the allegation, the university gave the impression to more than just questioning reporters that it didn't take the accusation seriously.

That's not the Notre Dame they brag about in brochures and commercials.
I know it's not politics, but it's important.
Related posts on AMERICAblog:
Read more at www.americablog.com
 

Oh No!! Wikileaks Dumps Vatican Secrets!

(AoftheAP)
Two days after dumping hundreds of thousands of classified documents from the US State Department, Wikileaks has unexpectedly released thousands of Vatican state secrets onto the Internet.

Wikileaks issued the following statement immediately upon releasing the documents online: "Acting on a tip from an anonymous source, we were provided access to thousands of sensitive Vatican communiques, cables and memos. We would have released them sooner, but they were all written in Latin. Not only that, but since the data had been downloaded onto 8" floppy disks from the Vatican City State server, which is a refurbished ACS-8000 system, it took us awhile to transfer the data to a more up-to-date system."

The identity of the anonymous source has yet to be discovered; however, it is believed that the person responsible was a former seminarian who had been expelled from the Pontifical North American College for having posters of Richard McBrien and Hans Kung on the walls of his room.

Some of the alleged secrets uncovered in the data dump are:
  • the Vatican State Dept. had given many of the world leaders nicknames based on US television programs, such as "Carlton Banks" for President Obama; "Coach" (from Cheers) for Vice-President Biden; "Ricky Ricardo" for Fidel Castro; "Reverend Jim" for Muammar Gaddafi; "Tattoo" for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad; "Uncle Fester" for Kim Jong Il;
  • Vatican agents had tailed and bugged author Dan Brown, citing reports that he "was getting uncomfortably close to the truth" with the Angel and Demons and The Da Vinci Code novels;
  • Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, has been referred to as "that freakshow runaway badly in need of an eyebrow trim and a tube of hair gel";
  • prominent Catholic politicians and celebrities were the subject of many memos - Nancy Pelosi was referred to as "a glittering jewel of theological idiocy"; Tony Blair was often called "the high-profile charlatan"; Sean Hannity, Christ Matthews and Bill O'Reilly were referred to as "the 3 Stooges of American media - their misunderstanding of their own Catholic faith is just incoherent slapstick and sight gags."
  • The Vatican bank maintains unmarked accounts that Catholic politicians have been contributing to in order to avoid ex-communication.
  • the Vatican has spies regularly attend the USCCB meetings, with orders to monitor who drinks what, who runs up high hotel charges from watching too many in-room movies, and who sleeps the most during the meetings.
  • There are several pages devoted to the recent dust-up concerning the new English translation; one Vatican official is quoted as saying "Whoever came up with 'Fishperson' for Bishop Trautman deserves a plenary indulgence! Very funny!";
  • Pope Benedict XVI was asked to guest host Saturday Night Live when he visited America in 2008, but he had to decline due to a scheduling conflict;
  • The Apostolic Visitation of Women Religious was code-named "Salem II";
  • The Vatican operates a covert blog operation, which underwrites such sites as Curt Jester, Creative Minority Report, The Hermeneutic of Continuity and LOLCats.
Surprisingly, some of the data and secrets uncovered pertained to events and issues that had occurred decades, even centuries, ago. Among those were:
  • Church officials never really had a problem with Galileo - they just wanted to "play some mind games with him and have a little fun";
  • Pope Julius II's first choice to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel was a guy named Pietro who drew caricatures for the tourists;
  • The Vatican Bank helped fund the faked lunar landings in the 60's and 70's;
  • For a few years in the early 1980's, whenever Pope John Paul II met privately with prominent dissidents and rogue theologians, he would conclude the meetings by declaring "Release the Kraken!", and then summon the CDF;
  • They have a list of who's in Hell, they just aren't telling people about it so that no one gets upset should they discover their loved ones are on the list;
  • In early 1981, the Vatican attempted to copyright the phrase "Spirit of Vatican II" in order to generate revenue from any individual or organization wanting to use the phrase, and to litigate against groups using the phrase without permission. The plan would have raised hundreds of millions of dollars, but it was dropped shortly after the assassination attempt on John Paul II on May 13, 1981. Evidence shows that Call-to-Action, and not the Soviet government, planned the attempt in retaliation for the Vatican's copyright plan.
Officials from the Vatican have remained silent regarding the leak. Speaking on condition of anonymity to AoftheA, one official remarked that they would normally issue a press release through L'Osservatore Romano, or have Fr. Lombardi issue a statement. "But they've been screwing up so much lately, we've decided it's best to not comment on this document dump, lest our statements get misreported. As usual."

It's unclear how much negative impact these revelations might have on ecumenical matters with the Anglican Church and the SSPX, or on diplomatic relations between the Vatican and other nation-states. Only time will tell. When asked about the leaks, US President spokesman Robert Gibbs remarked: "We do not foresee our relationship with the Holy See undergoing any significant change. We will continue to say we are in accord with much of what the Holy See stands for, and then turn around and act in a completely opposite manner."

On a positive note, it was discovered that the Third Secret of Fatima had indeed been released in full.
Read more at actsoftheapostasy.blogspot.com
 

Massive Wikileaks disclosure involves Vatican cables

Massive Wikileaks disclosure involves Vatican cables
By Marianne Medlin, Staff Writer

Washington D.C., Nov 30, 2010 / 06:14 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- As the uproar increases over Wikileaks publishing hundreds of thousands of confidential U.S. State Department cables online, the latest reports show that 852 of the communications involve the Vatican.

U.S. leaders are decrying Wikileaks founder, Australian Julian Assange, for incrementally publishing over 250,000 cables on his non-profit website. The cables are suspected of being leaked to Assange by 23 year-old U.S. army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, among others. Manning is currently being held at a military base in Virginia.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton blasted the move Nov. 29 as “not just an attack on America’s foreign policy interests” but an “attack on the international community.”

Documents involve U.S. correspondence with dozens of countries all over the globe, with the highest number of cables – 16,000 – involving Iraq. Not all cables have been released, given that the sheer number requires incremental publishing. However, cables involving North Korea, China and Argentina have already been shown online.

According to Wikileaks, 852 of the documents slated to be published involve correspondence between the U.S. and the Vatican.

CNA contacted the U.S. State Department Nov. 30 for more information on the nature of the documents. Spokesperson Megan Mattson said that “as a policy we don't comment on documents that purport to contain classified information.” Mattson added that the State Department condemns “in the strongest terms the deliberate and unauthorized disclosure of classified materials by individuals and organizations” which she said “puts lives and risk and jeopardizes national security.”

Already public, however, is a 2005 document published by Italy's La Stampa which shows U.S. diplomats expressing surprise over the election of Pope Benedict XVI. According to the paper, U.S. officials said they thought a papal candidate from a developing country would be selected instead.

Although the document is not part of the 852 cache of cables, La Stampa ran an article with the document, saying that they obtained the information by filing a Freedom of Information Act.

The Vatican daily newspaper L'Osservatore Romano stressed that the release of the cables does nothing to change diplomatic relations between the U.S and the Holy See.

Leaked correspondence does “not appear sufficient to substantially modify the relations” the U.S. has with various world governments, the paper said on Nov. 29.

The entire batch of the Vatican-related cables is expected to be published in the upcoming weeks.

Read more at www.catholicnewsagency.com
 

Children ‘riot’ in overcrowded detention centre, Jesuit Refugee Service contracted to relocate boys



Children ‘riot’ in overcrowded detention centreBy Frances Evans, Melbourne


Photo: Refugeeadvocacynetwork.org
The Melbourne Immigration Transit Accommodation (MITA) refugee centre in Broadmeadows has beds for 50 people. It housed 46 unaccompanied refugee teenagers until the government expanded the facility to detain more refugees.
The centre now detains 132 boys, all aged under 17. The youngest is 13 or 14. Most of the boys are unclear about their own ages, and many don’t carry any form of ID, passports or birth certificates.
After the arrival of 98 new people, there was a “riot” on November 13. Forty were injured and seven hospitalised.
The fight developed because there were only six internet computers to share between 132 people. They were fighting because none of the newly arrived refugees had been able to contact their families to tell them they had been moved.
Most refugees in MITA are Pashtuns or Hazaras from Afghanistan, but there are also Iranians, Kurds and Iraqis. All the children are boys and the local priest said it was Afghan custom to send the first-born away in wartime.
A group of activists from the Refugee Action Collective visited MITA on November 19 with a list of 15 people to visit.
We were herded, after discussions with security, into a meeting room with our boxes of fruit and juice. We could see a big soccer match outside and some kids on the volleyball court.
We were allowed outside into the recreation area. The metal portable buildings at the back of the soccer field had many children flocked around and there were also 10 other visitors watching the soccer match.
I joined the volleyball match and noticed that many boys had bandaids, black eyes, and slashed arms. A further 20 sat around watching, too depressed to play any sport.
I met 15 boys and found out that, after the riot, all the newly arrived refugees had been banned from using the internet. As a result, none of the new arrivals had talked to case managers, legal aid, or rung their parents in the first week of being at MITA.
None of the new arrivals had phones and all requested that I bring dictionaries when I next visited. The day we visited, someone was due to bring in phones for the boys.
One boy had been waiting four months to have his visa processed and could not because the immigration department could not verify his identity.
Hotham City Mission and Jesuit Refugee Service have been contracted to relocate these boys into community housing. The date for this move is unknown. The federal Labor government announced on October 18 that children would be released from detention and housed in the community, but this has not happened.
To get involved in the campaign to support refugees, visit the Refugee Action Collective website www.rac-vic.org .

Rare video JFK 1960 Speech at the Houston Ministers